Construct validity of the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation questionnaire (PRWHE) for nerve repair in the hand

A systematic review and meta-analysis of Patient-Rated Wrist (and Hand) Evaluation (PRWE/PRWHE) measurement properties, translation, and/ or cross-cultural adaptation

PURPOSE

To critically appraise, summarize, and synthesize the evidence on the psychometric, translation and/or cross-cultural adaptation properties of the Patient-Rated Wrist (and Hand) Evaluation (PRWE/PRWHE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched from 1998 to February 2021. Studies addressing psychometric, translation and/or cross-cultural adaptation properties were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality of the studies using the COSMIN checklist. Where possible, meta-analysis was conducted to pool the estimates of each measurement property. Otherwise, qualitative synthesis was conducted. The overall quality of evidence on each measurement property was provided using GRADE principles.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies were eligible for data extraction. The PRWE/PRWHE has been translated into 21 languages. The best factor structure was a one-dimensional construct with three unidimensional subscales. High-quality evidence supports very good structural and cross-cultural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and hypothesis testing for construct validity against DASH in wrist and hand injuries. However, low-quality evidence supports acceptable responsiveness property. The minimal clinically important difference for the PRWE/PRWHE was 24 points for patient-level comparisons and 17 for groups.

CONCLUSION

High-quality evidence supports the use of PRWE/PRWHE as a reliable, valid, and structurally sound questionnaire to assess pain and disability in patients with various wrist and hand injuries. Registration code: CRD42020180250IMPLICATION FOR REHABILITATIONSThe PRWE/PRWHE is a reliable and valid anatomical region-specific measure to assess pain and disability in patients with wrist and hand injuries.Each individual subscale of the PRWE/PRHWE (pain, specific activities, and usual activities) can be used separately as a measure of pain and disability.Change scores less than 9/100 in the total score, should be considered as measurement error, not ‎real change. Changes in the total score between 17 and 24/100 could be assumed as the minimal ‎clinically important change in the condition of patients over time. ‎The PRWE/PRWHE is available in 21 different languages and has been successfully adapted into highly diverse cultures. This point could be considered as one of the merits of using PRWE/PRWHE in clinical settings in multi-lingual and multi-cultural countries, when clinicians need a psychometrically sound ‎patient reported wrist/hand measure.‎.

Cold sensitivity and its association to functional disability following a major nerve trunk injury in the upper extremity-A national registry-based study

AIMS

To investigate self-reported cold sensitivity and functional disability after a repaired major nerve trunk injury in the upper extremity.

METHODS

We identified 735 individuals with a major nerve trunk injury in the upper extremity, surgically treated with direct nerve repair or reconstructed with nerve autografts, in the Swedish national quality registry for hand surgery (HAKIR). Patient-reported symptoms, including cold sensitivity, and perceived disability were collected using two questionnaires (HQ-8 and QuickDASH) preoperatively, and at three and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

We included 281 individuals, who had responded the questionnaires, where 197 (70%) were men (median age 34 [interquartile range 25-52] years) and 84 (30%) were women (median age 41 [25-55]). Cold sensitivity (scored 0-100) was the most prominent symptom 12 months postoperatively after an injured and repaired/reconstructed median (p<0.001) or ulnar (p<0.001) nerve, while individuals with a radial nerve injury showed milder symptoms. Concomitant injuries did not affect cold sensitivity scores. Individuals with ulnar nerve injuries scored higher in stiffness (p = 0.019), weakness (p<0.001) and ability to perform daily activities (p = 0.003) at 12 months postoperatively than median nerve injuries. Individuals with a median, ulnar or radial nerve injury with severe (>70) cold sensitivity had 25, 37 and 30 points higher QuickDASH scores, respectively (p<0.001), at 12 months postoperatively than individuals with mild (<30) cold sensitivity. There were no differences in QuickDASH score or cold sensitivity score at 12 months postoperatively between direct nerve repair or nerve reconstruction with nerve autografts. Neither age, nor sex, affected QuickDASH score at 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Cold sensitivity after surgery for a major nerve trunk injury in the upper extremity can be substantial with impaired ability to perform daily activities, where an ulnar nerve injury may have a worse outcome.

Research reporting in cubital tunnel syndrome studies: an analysis of the literature

PURPOSE

There is a strong need for a set of consensus outcomes to be utilized for future studies on cubital tunnel syndrome. The goal was to assess the outcome measures utilized in the cubital tunnel syndrome literature as a way of measuring popularity/acceptability and then to perform a literature review for the most commonly used outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the pubmed.gov database and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). For each article, the following data were abstracted: study type, motor outcome(s), sensory outcome(s), composite outcome(s), patient-reported outcome (PRO) metric(s), pain outcome(s), psychological outcome(s), electrodiagnostic outcome(s), and any other outcomes that were used.

RESULTS

A composite outcome was reported in 52/85 (61%) studies, with the modified Bishop score (27/85; 32%) most common. A motor outcome was reported in 44/85 (52%) studies, with dynamometry (38/85; 45%) most common. The majority of studies (55%) did not report a sensory outcome. The majority of studies (52%) did not report a PRO. A specific pain outcome was reported in the minority (23/85; 27%), with the visual analogue scale (VAS) (22/85; 26%) most common. Pre- and postoperative electrodiagnostic results were presented in 22/85 studies (26%).

DISCUSSION

Understanding current clinical practice and historical outcomes reporting provides a foundation for discussion regarding the development of a core outcome set for cubital tunnel syndrome. We hope that the data provided in the current study will stoke a discussion that will culminate in a consensus statement for research reporting in cubital tunnel syndrome studies.

Comparison of 2 Postoperative Therapy Regimens After Trapeziectomy Due to Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The main aim of the present study was to evaluate whether early mobilization after trapeziectomy in the first carpometacarpal joint is noninferior to a postoperative regimen comprising the use of a rigid orthosis and mobilization after 6 weeks, with regards to patient-reported activity performance and the effect of surgery in patients with first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial, participants were assessed at baseline (before group allocation) and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The primary outcomes were activity performance, measured using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (1-10, where 1 = unable to perform), and the patient-reported effect of surgery on a 6-point scale ranging from "much worse" to "completely recovered." A change of 2.0 points in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was used as a noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included hand function (patient-reported in the Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand questionnaire), pain on a numeric rating scale, grip and pinch strengths, and joint mobility. We performed both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 59 participants (88% women) with a mean age of 65 years, 55 (93%) completed all assessments. We found no differences between the groups in primary or secondary outcomes at any time point, except for more decreased pain at rest in the intervention group (n = 28) compared with the control group (n = 27) after 12 months. The per-protocol analyses did not change these results. Fifteen participants experienced 1 or more adverse events during the first 3 months, but the types and frequencies of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A postoperative regimen with early mobilization after trapeziectomy is as safe and effective as a postoperative regimen with longer immobilization in patients with first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Relationship Between Sensibility Tests and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Upper Limb Nerve Injuries: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate which tests of hand sensibility correlate with functional outcomes in patients with upper limb traumatic nerve injuries and to assess if composite scales of sensibility correlate with functions.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched in May 2020, with a supplementary search in July 2020. Reference lists of the included publications were hand searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Database search found 2437 records. Eligible studies reported on inferential association between sensibility tests and functions pertaining to adults after upper limb nerve repair. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility. Fifteen publications were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Extracted data contain patient characteristics, surgical procedure, follow-up duration, sensibility tests, and functional assessments. Two reviewers independently assessed data quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fifteen publications involving 849 patients were reviewed. All publications reported on median and/or ulnar nerve injuries. Monofilament tests correlated with Short-Form Health Survey (r=0.548, P<.05), pick-up test (r=0.45, P<.05), and function domain of Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWHE) (r=0.58, P<.05). The 8 studies of static and moving 2-point discrimination provided conflicting correlations with activities of daily living (ADL) and/or the pick-up test. Data for area localization and object/shape identification were equivocal as well. No data were found for Ten test and vibration tests. Rosén score sensory domain correlated with ADL (r=0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.72) and PRWHE function domain (r=-0.56, P<.05). Medical Research Council sensory scale was related to pick-up test; return to work status; and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Monofilament tests allow practitioners to gather sensibility data meaningful to patients' overall recovery of functions after upper limb nerve trauma. For 2-point discrimination and other sensibility tests, practitioners should be aware that improvement in test performance does not necessarily translate to improved hand function. Findings from the composite scales indicate that hand sensibility, in general, is related to functions. Future research on other common sensibility tests is recommended to explore how the test relates to patients' functions.

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of Brazilian version of QuickDASH

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the construct validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the Brazilian version of Quick-DASH (QD-Br) in patients with upper limb disorders.

METHOD

Participants completed the full Brazilian DASH, the QD-Br and the SF-12 Brazil questionnaires at the beginning of treatment, after 48-72h and the after 2-12 months. Construct validity was analysed by Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). To evaluate the test-retest reliability we used the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient to test the internal consistency. Responsiveness was analysed by Standardized Response Mean (SRM) and Effect Size (ES). The Minimal detectable change (MDC) score was based upon calculations of the standard error of measurement (SEM), confidence interval of 95%.

RESULTS

The construct validity presented strong direct correlation with the total QD-Br score and the Brazilian DASH (r = 0.91), a moderate inverse correlation between the total QD-Br score and the physical component of the SF- 12 Brazil (r = -0.55) and weak inverse correlation between the QD-Br and the mental component of SF-12 Brazil (r = -0.49). The ICC test-retest showed good reliability of 0.81 (0.72-0.87). QD-BR presented high responsiveness, with ES of 1.06 and SRM of 0.94. The MDC was 17.27 points.

CONCLUSION

These results provide evidence that the QD-Br was a valid, reliable and responsive instrument when utilized in patients with upper limb traumatic and no-traumatic disorders in the Brazilian population.