1
|
González-Márquez A, Andrade-Alvarado AD, González-Mota R, Sánchez C. Enhanced degradation of phototreated recycled and unused low-density polyethylene films by Pleurotus ostreatus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2024; 40:309. [PMID: 39179751 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-024-04116-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
Polyethylene, one of the most used petroleum-derived polymers, causes serious environmental pollution. The ability of Pleurotus ostreatus to degrade UV-treated and untreated recycled and unused (new) low-density polyethylene (LDPE) films was studied. We determined the fungal biomass production, enzyme production, and enzyme yield. Changes in the chemical structure and surface morphology of the LDPE after fungal growth were analyzed using FTIR spectroscopy and SEM. Functional group indices and contact angles were also evaluated. In general, the highest Lac (6013 U/L), LiP (2432 U/L), MnP (995 U/L) and UP (6671 U/L) activities were observed in irradiated recycled LDPE (IrRPE). The contact angle of all samples was negatively correlated with fermentation time; the smaller the contact angle, the longer the fermentation time, indicating effective biodegradation. The IrRPE samples exhibited the smallest contact angle (49°) at 4 weeks, and the samples were fragmented (into two pieces) at 5 weeks. This fungus could degrade unused (new) LDPE significantly within 6 weeks. The biodegradation of LDPE proceeded faster in recycled than in unused samples, which can be enhanced by exposing LDPE to UV radiation. Enzymatic production during fungal growth suggest that LDPE degradation is initiated by laccase (Lac) followed by lignin peroxidase (LiP), whereas manganese peroxidase (MnP) and unspecific peroxygenase (UP) are involved in the final degradation process. This is the first experimental study on the fungal growth and its main enzymes involved in LDPE biodegradation. This fungus has great promise as a safe, efficient, and environmentally friendly organism capable of degrading LDPE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel González-Márquez
- Laboratory of Biotechnology, Research Centre for Biological Sciences, Autonomous University of Tlaxcala, Ixtacuixtla, Tlaxcala, 90120, Mexico
| | | | - Rosario González-Mota
- Laboratory of Optoelectronics, Technological Institute of Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, 20256, Mexico
| | - Carmen Sánchez
- Laboratory of Biotechnology, Research Centre for Biological Sciences, Autonomous University of Tlaxcala, Ixtacuixtla, Tlaxcala, 90120, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Antón-Herrero R, Chicca I, García-Delgado C, Crognale S, Lelli D, Gargarello RM, Herrero J, Fischer A, Thannberger L, Eymar E, Petruccioli M, D’Annibale A. Main Factors Determining the Scale-Up Effectiveness of Mycoremediation for the Decontamination of Aliphatic Hydrocarbons in Soil. J Fungi (Basel) 2023; 9:1205. [PMID: 38132804 PMCID: PMC10745009 DOI: 10.3390/jof9121205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Soil contamination constitutes a significant threat to the health of soil ecosystems in terms of complexity, toxicity, and recalcitrance. Among all contaminants, aliphatic petroleum hydrocarbons (APH) are of particular concern due to their abundance and persistence in the environment and the need of remediation technologies to ensure their removal in an environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable way. Soil remediation technologies presently available on the market to tackle soil contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons (PH) include landfilling, physical treatments (e.g., thermal desorption), chemical treatments (e.g., oxidation), and conventional bioremediation. The first two solutions are costly and energy-intensive approaches. Conversely, bioremediation of on-site excavated soil arranged in biopiles is a more sustainable procedure. Biopiles are engineered heaps able to stimulate microbial activity and enhance biodegradation, thus ensuring the removal of organic pollutants. This soil remediation technology is currently the most environmentally friendly solution available on the market, as it is less energy-intensive and has no detrimental impact on biological soil functions. However, its major limitation is its low removal efficiency, especially for long-chain hydrocarbons (LCH), compared to thermal desorption. Nevertheless, the use of fungi for remediation of environmental contaminants retains the benefits of bioremediation treatments, including low economic, social, and environmental costs, while attaining removal efficiencies similar to thermal desorption. Mycoremediation is a widely studied technology at lab scale, but there are few experiences at pilot scale. Several factors may reduce the overall efficiency of on-site mycoremediation biopiles (mycopiles), and the efficiency detected in the bench scale. These factors include the bioavailability of hydrocarbons, the selection of fungal species and bulking agents and their application rate, the interaction between the inoculated fungi and the indigenous microbiota, soil properties and nutrients, and other environmental factors (e.g., humidity, oxygen, and temperature). The identification of these factors at an early stage of biotreatability experiments would allow the application of this on-site technology to be refined and fine-tuned. This review brings together all mycoremediation work applied to aliphatic petroleum hydrocarbons (APH) and identifies the key factors in making mycoremediation effective. It also includes technological advances that reduce the effect of these factors, such as the structure of mycopiles, the application of surfactants, and the control of environmental factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Antón-Herrero
- Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Food Science, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain; (R.A.-H.); (E.E.)
| | | | - Carlos García-Delgado
- Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvia Crognale
- Department for Innovation in Biological, Agri-Food and Forestry Systems, University of Tuscia, 01100 Tuscia, Italy; (S.C.); (D.L.); (M.P.); (A.D.)
| | - Davide Lelli
- Department for Innovation in Biological, Agri-Food and Forestry Systems, University of Tuscia, 01100 Tuscia, Italy; (S.C.); (D.L.); (M.P.); (A.D.)
| | - Romina Mariel Gargarello
- Water, Air and Soil Unit, Eurecat, Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya, 08242 Manresa, Spain; (R.M.G.); (J.H.)
| | - Jofre Herrero
- Water, Air and Soil Unit, Eurecat, Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya, 08242 Manresa, Spain; (R.M.G.); (J.H.)
| | | | | | - Enrique Eymar
- Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Food Science, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain; (R.A.-H.); (E.E.)
| | - Maurizio Petruccioli
- Department for Innovation in Biological, Agri-Food and Forestry Systems, University of Tuscia, 01100 Tuscia, Italy; (S.C.); (D.L.); (M.P.); (A.D.)
| | - Alessandro D’Annibale
- Department for Innovation in Biological, Agri-Food and Forestry Systems, University of Tuscia, 01100 Tuscia, Italy; (S.C.); (D.L.); (M.P.); (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|