1
|
Rubin MA, Riecke J, Heitman E. Futility and Shared Decision-Making. Neurol Clin 2023; 41:455-467. [PMID: 37407099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
Medical futility is an ancient and yet consistent challenge in clinical medicine. The means of balancing conflicting priorities and stakeholders' preferences has changed as much as the science that powers the understanding and treatment of disease. The introduction of patient self-determination and choice in medical decision-making shifted the locus of power in the physician-patient relationship but did not obviate the physician's responsibilities to provide benefit and prevent harm. As we have refined the process in time, new paradigms, specialists, and tools have been developed to help navigate the ever-changing landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Rubin
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8855, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8855, USA.
| | - Jenny Riecke
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8855, USA; Department of Palliative Care, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8855, USA
| | - Elizabeth Heitman
- Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, NC5.832, Dallas, TX 75390-9070, USA; Department of Applied Clinical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, NC5.832, Dallas, TX 75390-9070, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wartenberg KE, Hwang DY, Haeusler KG, Muehlschlegel S, Sakowitz OW, Madžar D, Hamer HM, Rabinstein AA, Greer DM, Hemphill JC, Meixensberger J, Varelas PN. Gap Analysis Regarding Prognostication in Neurocritical Care: A Joint Statement from the German Neurocritical Care Society and the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care 2020; 31:231-244. [PMID: 31368059 PMCID: PMC6757096 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-019-00769-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Background/Objective Prognostication is a routine part of the delivery of neurocritical care for most patients with acute neurocritical illnesses. Numerous prognostic models exist for many different conditions. However, there are concerns about significant gaps in knowledge regarding optimal methods of prognostication. Methods As part of the Arbeitstagung NeuroIntensivMedizin meeting in February 2018 in Würzburg, Germany, a joint session on prognostication was held between the German NeuroIntensive Care Society and the Neurocritical Care Society. The purpose of this session was to provide presentations and open discussion regarding existing prognostic models for eight common neurocritical care conditions (aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, traumatic spinal cord injury, status epilepticus, Guillain–Barré Syndrome, and global cerebral ischemia from cardiac arrest). The goal was to develop a qualitative gap analysis regarding prognostication that could help inform a future framework for clinical studies and guidelines. Results Prognostic models exist for all of the conditions presented. However, there are significant gaps in prognostication in each condition. Furthermore, several themes emerged that crossed across several or all diseases presented. Specifically, the self-fulfilling prophecy, lack of accounting for medical comorbidities, and absence of integration of in-hospital care parameters were identified as major gaps in most prognostic models. Conclusions Prognostication in neurocritical care is important, and current prognostic models are limited. This gap analysis provides a summary assessment of issues that could be addressed in future studies and evidence-based guidelines in order to improve the process of prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja E Wartenberg
- Neurocritical Care and Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - David Y Hwang
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208018, New Haven, CT, 06520-8018, USA
| | - Karl Georg Haeusler
- Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Muehlschlegel
- Department of Neurology, Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA
| | - Oliver W Sakowitz
- Neurosurgery Center Ludwigsburg-Heilbronn, RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Posilipostrasse 4, 71640, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Madžar
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hajo M Hamer
- Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - David M Greer
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Medical Center, 72 East Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - J Claude Hemphill
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA
| | - Juergen Meixensberger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Panayiotis N Varelas
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd Neurosurgery - K-11, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Case BC, Qamer SZ, Gates EM, Srichai MB. Shared Decision Making in Cardiovascular Disease in the Outpatient Setting. JACC Case Rep 2019; 1:261-270. [PMID: 34316804 PMCID: PMC8301252 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The authors developed a patient decision aid (PDA) to educate patients regarding CAD. Patients were randomized to standard of care or a PDA. PDA group had increased medical knowledge of CAD and decreased decisional conflict. Patients presenting in an outpatient setting with symptoms may benefit from the use of a PDA. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C. Case
- Division of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Syed Z. Qamer
- Division of Cardiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Emily M. Gates
- Division of Cardiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Monvadi B. Srichai
- Division of Cardiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|