Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias

Harlequin syndrome in a patient with probable hemicrania continua and exertional headache - is there a link? a case report

BACKGROUND

The harlequin syndrome is a rare disorder of the autonomic nervous system characterized by unilateral diminished flushing and sweating of the face following exposure to heat or physical activity. It results from sympathetic dysfunction and most commonly occurs idiopathically. A secondary development due to an underlying pathology (e.g., carotid artery dissection, tumors) must be excluded at first appearance. There is evidence that the cranial autonomic system is involved in the pathophysiology of trigeminal autonomic headaches like hemicrania continua. Therefore, an overlap in the pathophysiology of harlequin syndrome and trigeminal autonomic headache disorders seems plausible. However, the association of a harlequin syndrome with hemicrania continua was never reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

This work describes the case of a 42-year-old female patient presenting to our headache unit. The patient reported persisting unilateral headache of the right side of dragging or squeezing character accompanied by trigeminal autonomic symptoms, including lacrimation, nasal congestion, conjunctival injection and Horner's syndrome, and was responsive to treatment with 75mg/d indomethacin. Five months after the initial consultation, the patient noted that the upper right quadrant of her face was pale after jogging. A harlequin syndrome was diagnosed. Further, she developed a short-lasting, bilateral headache of pulsatile character during strenuous exercise consistent with exertional headache. Comprehensive diagnostic evaluations, encompassing cranial and cervical MRI scans, laboratory tests, and biopsies, culminated in the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome. This finding suggests that the trigemino-autonomic dysfunction may either be idiopathic or a direct manifestation of Sjögren's syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

This report documents the case of a rare combination of a headache resembling probable hemicrania continua and the harlequin syndrome (and even exertional headache). It illustrates the underlying anatomy of the autonomic nervous system in a clinical context and emphasizes the hypothesis of a pathophysiological link between abnormal sympathetic activity and trigeminal autonomic headaches.

The Challenges in Clinical Diagnosis of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Review

The lack of established laboratory tests or biomarkers for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) makes diagnosing this relatively rare condition extremely challenging. Trigeminal nerve compression observable on magnetic resonance imaging may indicate TN, but many patients do not have visible lesions or compression. In particular, TN may be confused with migraine, cluster headache, temporomandibular disorder, and other types of headache. An accurate diagnosis is imperative for proper treatment since these conditions do not respond to the same treatment. Many symptoms of these headaches can be vague or overlap, and clinicians depend in large measure on the subjective reports of their patients. Nevertheless, it is imperative to diagnose TN better, which can cause excruciating pain, reduce the quality of life, and even result in disability. It is possible that TN is underestimated.

The critical role of neuroimaging in hemicrania continua: A systematic review and case series

BACKGROUND

Hemicrania continua is a primary unilateral headache characterized by ipsilateral parasympathetic and sympathetic autonomic features. A key diagnostic criterion is its dramatic response to indomethacin treatment; however, various vascular or structural abnormalities have been reported to cause secondary hemicrania continua, presenting with clinical features similar to those of the primary headache presentation.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the literature to compile secondary hemicrania continua cases, highlighting the importance of imaging during the evaluation. Additionally, we also contributed our three cases to the existing studies.

METHODS

We conducted a review of articles from the PubMed and EMBASE databases that described reported cases of secondary hemicrania continua, covering the period from 1993 to 2021. Our review included detailed patient information, signs, and symptoms of hemicrania continua, as well as information on indomethacin usage and headache resolution (if pertinent).

RESULTS

Secondary hemicrania continua can result from a remarkably diverse range of structural and vascular lesions, yet clinical reports on long-term follow-up are lacking. Notably, cases may exhibit a classical response to indomethacin, emphasizing the importance of neuroimaging in excluding secondary cases. Our search yielded 41 cases meeting our criteria. We excluded six cases that were not treated with indomethacin or were unresponsive to it. Additionally, we present three cases that highlight the necessity of neuroimaging in evaluating hemicrania continua, along with short- and long-term clinical outcomes following indomethacin and lesion-directed treatments. Case 1 presented with daily right-sided headaches and cranial autonomic symptoms. Her pain completely resolved with indomethacin use. Neuroimaging of the brain revealed a laterally directed saccular aneurysm of the right internal carotid artery. Case 2 presented with continuous left-sided unilateral headaches with superimposed exacerbations. She complained of left-sided photophobia with a dull sensation in the left ear. Her symptoms decreased after 2 weeks of indomethacin use. Neuroimaging of the head indicated a benign tumor with mass effect into the left lateral medulla and inferior cerebellar peduncle. Case 3 presented with a right side-locked headache with daily, severe superimposed exacerbations. She had photophobia in the right eye and a right-sided Horner's syndrome, along with tearing during her exacerbations. Neuroimaging of the brain revealed a pituitary tumor and her pain completely resolved with indomethacin.

CONCLUSION

Hemicrania continua is a rare headache disorder that can be either primary or secondary. Importantly, response to indomethacin can still occur in secondary hemicrania continua. Thus, neuroimaging should be considered to rule out underlying structural etiology in all cases, regardless of their clinical responsiveness to indomethacin therapy.

Approach to the Patient With Headache

OBJECTIVE

The evaluation of patients with headache relies heavily on the history. This article reviews key questions for diagnosing primary and secondary headache disorders with a rationale for each and phrasing to optimize the information obtained and the patient's experience.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The availability of online resources for clinicians and patients continues to increase, including sites that use artificial intelligence to generate a diagnosis and report based on patient responses online. Patient-friendly headache apps include calendars that help track treatment response, identify triggers, and provide educational information.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

A structured approach to taking the history, incorporating online resources and other technologies when needed, facilitates making an accurate diagnosis and often eliminates the need for unnecessary testing. A detailed yet empathetic approach incorporating interpersonal skills enhances relationship building and trust, both of which are integral to successful treatment.

Melatonin in hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania

BACKGROUND

Hemicrania continua (HC) and paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) belong to a group of primary headache disorders called trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. One of the diagnostic criteria for both HC and PH is the absolute response to the therapeutic dose of indomethacin. However, indomethacin is discontinued in many patients as a result of intolerance to its side effects. Melatonin, a pineal hormone, which shares similar chemical structure to indomethacin, has been reported to have some efficacy for HC in previous case reports and series. To our knowledge, there is no literature regarding the use of melatonin in PH. We aimed to describe the clinical use of melatonin in the preventive management of HC and PH.

METHODS

Patient level data were extracted as an audit from routinely collected clinical records in consecutive patients seen in outpatient neurology clinic at King's College Hospital, London, UK, from September 2014 to April 2023. Our cohort of patients were identified through a search using the keywords: hemicrania continua, paroxysmal hemicrania, melatonin and indomethacin. Descriptive statistics including absolute and relative frequencies, mean ± SD, median and interquartile range (IQR) were used.

RESULTS

Fifty-six HC patients were included with a mean ± SD age of 52 ± 16 years; 43 of 56 (77%) patients were female. Melatonin was taken by 23 (41%) patients. Of these 23 patients, 19 (83%) stopped indomethacin because of different side effects. The doses of melatonin used ranged from 0.5 mg to 21 mg, with a median dose of 10 mg (IQR = 6-13 mg). Fourteen (61%) patients reported positive relief for headache, whereas the remaining nine (39%) patients reported no headache preventive effect. None of the patients reported that they were completely pain free. Two patients continued indomethacin and melatonin concurrently for better symptom relief. Eight patients continued melatonin as the single preventive treatment. Side effects from melatonin were rare. Twenty-two PH patients were included with mean ± SD age of 50 ± 17 years; 17 of 22 (77%) patients were female. Melatonin was given to six (27%) patients. The median dose of melatonin used was 8 mg (IQR = 6-10 mg). Three (50%) patients responded to melatonin treatment. One of them used melatonin as adjunctive treatment with indomethacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Melatonin showed some efficacy in the treatment of HC and PH with a well-tolerated side effect profile. It does not have the same absolute responsiveness as indomethacin, at the doses used, although it does offer a well-tolerated option that can have significant ameliorating effects in a substantial cohort of patients.

Lymphoma masquerading as jaw pain, headache, and syncope: A case report

BACKGROUND

Lymphomas of parapharyngeal space often have complex manifestations, posing a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 64-year-old man sought treatment for a 4-month history of unresolving right-sided headache and jaw pain associated with syncope, all of which started with a toothache. Since the onset of pain, the patient had undergone multiple diagnostic tests with various specialists, with no pain relief. A detailed clinical and radiologic examination by an orofacial pain specialist revealed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the parapharynx.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

A thorough knowledge of the head and neck anatomy helps in identifying the pathophysiology of complex orofacial pain manifestations, which assists in early diagnosis and treatment.

Sex as a Biological Variable in Oral Diseases: Evidence and Future Prospects

The interest of the scientific community on sex and gender differences in health and disease has increased substantially over the past 25 to 30 y as a result of a long process of events and policies in the biomedical field. This is crucial as compelling evidence from human and animal model studies has demonstrated that sex and gender influence health, molecular and cellular processes, and response and predisposition to disease. The present scoping review aims to provide a synthesis of sex differences in oral diseases, ranging from periodontal disease to orofacial pain conditions, from risk of caries development to apical periodontitis. Overall, findings from this review further support a role for sexual dimorphism influencing disease predisposition and/or progression in oral diseases. Of note, this review also highlights the lack of consideration of additional factors such as gender and other psychosocial and external factors potentially influencing oral health and disease. New conceptual frameworks capable of capturing multiple fundamental domains and measurements should be developed in clinical and preclinical studies to inform sex-based individualized preventive and treatment strategies.

A Rare Case of Cluster Headache Occurring Exclusively During Sleep Without Autonomic Symptoms and Agitation: A Case Report and Literature Review

As a primary headache disorder, cluster headache (CH) is a severe unilateral headache that recurs at certain times of the year, such as during season changes. It is characterized by autonomic symptoms, such as ipsilateral lacrimal and nasal discharge, as well as an inability to stay still during headache attacks. We report a rare case of CH in a 67-year-old male who presented with a severe right-sided headache lasting 30 minutes to one hour and occurring only during sleep. The headache resolved within five minutes after the subcutaneous injection of sumatriptan and was not accompanied by any autonomic symptoms or clear agitation.

Symptomatic trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiology of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) is poorly understood at present. Symptomatic TACs are rarely reported in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). To better clarify this distinct clinical manifestation in NMOSD and to investigate its possible pathophysiology, we reviewed articles describing such cases including our own case.

METHODS

We performed a search of all clinical studies of TACs in NMOSD published up to September 1st, 2022. We put no restrictions on the year of English publication in our search. The following keywords were searched: trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, cluster headache, short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT), short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with autonomic symptoms (SUNA), hemicrania continua, paroxysmal hemicrania, neuromyelitis optica, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, Devic's disease.

RESULT

We reviewed six cases (five published reports and our own case study) that fulfilled the diagnosis of NMOSD and TACs. Four of them were SUNCT, one was SUNA, and one was paroxysmal hemicrania. In three of these cases, headache was the initial sole manifestation. Only one case had a good response to routine TACs' treatment. All these patients had lesions in the medulla oblongata and cervical cord. Three cases' TACs were side-locked, and two of them had a left dorsolateral medulla oblongata lesion that corresponded with the left side TACs, while three cases' headaches happened on either side of the head. The phenomenon could be explained by the activation of trigeminal-autonomic reflex and ephaptic coupling.

CONCLUSION

TACs could be the initial sole brainstem manifestation of NMOSD. An underlying cause for SUNCT/SUNA should be considered, especially if there is a limited response to anti-epileptic medication. The activation of trigeminal-autonomic reflex and ephaptic coupling might be the underlying mechanism of symptomatic TACs in NMOSD.

Management of Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias Including Chronic Cluster: A Review

Importance

Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) comprise a unique collection of primary headache disorders characterized by moderate or severe unilateral pain, localized in in the area of distribution of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve, accompanied by cranial autonomic symptoms and signs. Most TACs are rare diseases, which hampers the possibility of performing randomized clinical trials and large studies. Therefore, knowledge of treatment efficacy must be based only on observational studies, rare disease registries, and case reports, where real-world data and evidence play an important role in health care decisions.

Observations

Chronic cluster headache is the most common of these disorders, and the literature offers some evidence from randomized clinical trials to support the use of pharmacologic and neurostimulation treatments. Galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide, was not effective at 3 months in a randomized clinical trial but showed efficacy at 12 months in a large case series. For the other TACs (ie, paroxysmal hemicrania, hemicrania continua, short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing, and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms), only case reports and case series are available to guide physicians in everyday management.

Conclusions and Relevance

The accumulation of epidemiologic, pathophysiologic, natural history knowledge, and data from case series and small controlled trials, especially over the past 20 years from investigators around the world, has added to the previously limited evidence and has helped advance and inform the treatment approach to rare TACs, which can be extremely challenging for clinicians.

Primary headache types in adult epilepsy patients

BACKGROUND

Headache is among the most common comorbidities in epilepsy. This study examined the distribution of different primary headache disorders in a large cohort of patients with diagnosed epilepsy. Headache types were analysed with regard to gender, type of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

In this prospective single-centre study, 500 patients with epilepsy (250 female, mean age: 45.52 ± 17.26 years) were evaluated with regards to primary headache types using a validated German headache questionnaire categorizing for migraine (MIG), tension-type headache (TTH) or trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TAC), their combinations and unclassifiable headache. Data regarding type of epilepsy, seizure-associated headache, AED treatment and seizure freedom were collected.

RESULTS

Of 500 patients with epilepsy, 163 (32.6%) patients (108 female and 55 male) reported suffering from headaches at least 1 day per month. MIG (without aura, with aura) and TTH were the most frequent headache type (MIG 33.1%, TTH 33.1%). Female epilepsy patients reported headaches significantly more often than male patients (x² = 8.20, p = 0.0042). In contrast, the type of epilepsy did not significantly affect headache distribution. Of 163 patients with headache, 66 (40.5%) patients reported seizure-associated headache and AEDs were used by 157 patients. Of importance, patients with AED monotherapy suffered from MIG less often when compared to patients on polytherapy (x² = 4.79, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

MIG and TTH are the most common headache types in epilepsy patients and headache is more frequent among female epilepsy patients. Monotherapy in AEDs might have a beneficial effect on the frequency of headache compared to polytherapy.

From basic mechanisms to therapeutic perspectives in cluster headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The pathophysiological understanding of cluster headache has evolved significantly over the past years. Although it is now well known that the trigeminovascular system, the parasympathetic system and the hypothalamus play important roles in its pathomechanism, we increasingly understand the functional role several neurotransmitters and hormones play in the communication between these structures.

RECENT FINDINGS

This work will give an overview of the current understanding of the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide, melatonin and orexins in cluster headache. On the basis of recent evidence, this study will also review the relevance of the monoclonal calcitonin gene-related peptide antibody galcanezumab as well as the sleep-regulating hormone melatonin in the treatment of cluster headache.

SUMMARY

Herein, we aim to review the basic mechanisms implicated in the pathophysiology of cluster headache and how the increased mechanistic understanding may lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets.

[Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalgias]

Compared with migraine and tension-type headache, trigeminal autonomic cephalgias (TAC) are rare, but the resulting significant impairment and the not irrelevant prevalence (e. g., cluster headache 0.1%) make TACs important diagnoses. Unfortunately, the correct diagnosis is often delayed. This article provides an overview of the diagnostic approach and therapeutic options in TACs.

Hemicrania continua secondary to neurogenic paravertebral tumor- a case report

OBJECTIVES

Hemicrania continua (HC) is one of the trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TAC), where sympathetic dysfunction and autonomic dysfunction resulting in parasympathetic over activation with some evidence of sympathetic inhibition have been suggested as probable causes. However, cases of hemicrania continua secondary to sympathetic dysfunction due to neurogenic paravertebral tumor impinging on the sympathetic chain has not been previously reported. In this case, the probability of the sympathetic dysfunction was more likely based on the clinical features and management.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 23-year-old female presented with a chief complaint of right unilateral pain in the retro-bulbar, head and facial region for the past three years. An initial MRI of the brain was negative, whereas an MRI of the spine was advised to rule out a cervicogenic origin of the pain. The MRI revealed a well-defined mass lesion within right paravertebral region at T3 indicative of a neurogenic tumor. The patient was diagnosed with probable hemicrania continua secondary to neurogenic tumor impinging on adjacent sympathetic chain. A trial of indomethacin 75 mg/day was advised, which provided complete relief of the headache. The patient was referred to a neurologist for management of the neurogenic tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Headache disorders may be secondary to pathologies and comprehensive evaluation and accurate diagnosis are essential. Knowledge of neuroanatomy is paramount to understand and explain underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Multidisciplinary management is essential in complex orofacial cases.

[Trigeminal autonomic cephalgias: features of diagnosis and treatment]

Trigeminal autonomic cephalgias is a group of primary headaches, including cluster headache, paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua, as well as two forms of short- lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks, the complexity of diagnosis of which is determined by the low prevalence and some similarity of clinical manifestations both among themselves and with other diseases in particular with migraine and trigeminal neuralgia. Despite the rather short duration of headache attacks, the intensity of the pain syndrome reaches a severe and very severe degree, and the high frequency of paroxysms per day significantly complicates abortion treatment and leads to a pronounced professional and social maladjustment. At the same time, the possibility of using effective specific prophylactic therapy determines the importance of accurate diagnosis and, therefore, the knowledge of neurologists on this issue.

SUNCT and SUNA: An Update

Background

Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with autonomic symptoms (SUNA) are rare and disabling primary headache disorders that are subtypes of Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks (SUNHA).

Aim

The aim of this narrative review was to provide a comprehensive update on headache phenotype, pathophysiology, and various treatment options available for SUNCT and SUNA.

Methods

References for this review were identified by searches of articles published in the English language in PubMed between 1978 and October 2020 using "short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT)", "short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with autonomic symptoms (SUNA)", "short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks (SUNHA)", "trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias" as keywords in various combinations.

Results

Of a potential 1103 articles, seven case series describing clinical characteristics of SUNCT/SUNA patients were identified for this review. For symptomatic/secondary SUNCT/SUNA, 53 individual case reports, and one case series were reviewed. One placebo-controlled trial and 11 open-label case series that evaluated various medical and surgical treatments in SUNCT/SUNA were also reviewed. Available literature suggests that SUNCT and SUNA are subtypes of the same disorder characterized by severe side locked short duration headache with ipsilateral prominent cranial autonomic symptoms and signs. Pathophysiology may involve both peripheral and central mechanisms. Lamotrigine is the most effective preventive therapy while intravenous lidocaine is the most efficacious drug as transitional therapy for severe disabling attacks. Surgical options including microvascular decompression in those having neurovascular conflict, occipital nerve stimulation, and hypothalamic deep brain stimulation can be alternative treatment options for medically refractory patients.

Indomethacin-responsive headaches-A narrative review

BACKGROUND

Indomethacin is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug whose mechanism of action in certain types of headache disorders remains unknown. The so-called indomethacin-responsive headache disorders consist of a group of conditions with a very different presentation that have a particularly good response to indomethacin. The response is so distinct as to be used in the definition of two: hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania.

METHODS

This is a narrative literature review. PubMed and the Cochrane databases were used for the literature search.

RESULTS

We review the main pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of indomethacin useful for daily practice. The proposed mechanisms of action of indomethacin in the responsive headache disorders, including its effect on cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure, with special attention to nitrergic mechanisms, are covered. The current evidence for its use in primary headache disorders, such as some trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, cough, hypnic, exertional or sexual headache, and migraine will be covered, as well as its indication for secondary headaches, such as those of posttraumatic origin.

CONCLUSION

Increasing understanding of the mechanism(s) of action of indomethacin will enhance our understanding of the complex pathophysiology that might be shared by indomethacin-sensitive headache disorders.

SUNCT/SUNA: Case series presenting in an orofacial pain clinic

AIM

Little is known about short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA). We present our experience with SUNCT/SUNA patients to aid identification and management of these disorders.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patient records of one orofacial pain clinic was performed. Inclusion criteria was a diagnosis of SUNCT/SUNA confirmed with at least one follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Six of the 2464 new patients seen between 2015-2018 met the selection criteria (SUNCT n = 2, SUNA n = 4). Gender distribution was one male to one female and average age of diagnosis was 52 years (range 26-62). Attacks were located in the V1/V2 trigeminal distributions, and five patients reported associated intraoral pain. Pain quality was sharp, shooting, and burning with two patients reporting "numbness". Pain was moderate-severe in intensity, with daily episodes that typically lasted for seconds. Common autonomic features were lacrimation, conjunctival injection, rhinorrhea, and flushing. Frequent triggers were touching the nose or a specific intraoral area. Lamotrigine and gabapentin were commonly used as initial therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Differentiating between SUNCT/SUNA does not appear to be clinically relevant. Presenting symptoms were consistent with those published, except 5/6 patients describing intraoral pain and two patients describing paresthesia.

Paroxysmal hemicrania masquerading as a stroke in an elderly gentleman: case report

Background

Paroxysmal hemicrania has not been associated with ipsilateral weakness, loss of sensation and Horner’s syndrome. This report is the first of its kind documented in literature.

Case presentation

This was an elderly, sixty-five-year-old Chinese male who presented with a headache fulfilling criteria of paroxysmal hemicrania and was found to have signs of ipsilateral conjunctival injection, Horner’s syndrome, weakness and loss of sensation; with resolution of the patient’s physical signs after relief of the headache. Brain magnetic resonance imaging did not show any strokes or other headache mimics. The patient had a marked response to indomethacin and a decrease of headache intensity and frequency with indomethacin prophylaxis.

Conclusions

Paroxysmal hemicrania has joined the list of stroke chameleons and that it would be one of the differentials in a patient with hemiplegia, hemisensory loss, autonomic signs and severe headache. It suggests that paroxysmal hemicrania in the elderly present atypically.

Can the effects of the mitochondrial DNA mutations found in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy be protective against the development of cluster headache in smokers?

Is it possible that some mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations enhance the risk of developing a headache disorder while other mutations actually confer a protective effect? Mitochondrial disorders have been linked to migraine but very rarely to cluster headache (CH). The true pathogenesis of CH is unknown but a linkage to cigarette smoking is irrefutable. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy is a syndrome of bilateral vision loss that typically manifests in a patient’s 20s and 30s, is male predominant, and its sufferers are heavy smokers and heavy drinkers. Tobacco exposure is so linked to the condition that only smokers appear to develop vision loss while nonsmokers remain unaffected carriers of their mutations. In essence, the Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy population is the CH population but at present there have been no reported cases of CH in this mitochondrial subgroup. Thus, could the effects of the mtDNA mutations found in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy, which involve complex I of the electron transport chain, actually confer a protective effect against the development of CH? This article will delve into this theory.

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for primary headache: A clinical update

Background

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) is a proven treatment for cluster headache and migraine. Several possible mechanisms of action by which nVNS mitigates headache have been identified.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review of recent scientific and clinical research into nVNS for headache, including findings from mechanistic studies and their possible relationships to the clinical effects of nVNS.

Results

Findings from animal and human studies have provided possible mechanistic explanations for nVNS efficacy in headache involving four core areas: Autonomic nervous system functions; cortical spreading depression inhibition; neurotransmitter regulation; and nociceptive modulation. We discuss how overlap and interplay among these areas may underlie the utility of nVNS in the context of clinical evidence supporting its safety and efficacy as acute and preventive therapy for both cluster headache and migraine. Possible future nVNS applications are also discussed.

Conclusion

Significant progress over the past several years has yielded valuable mechanistic and clinical evidence that, combined with the excellent safety and tolerability profile of nVNS, suggests that it should be considered a first-line treatment for both acute and preventive treatment of cluster headache, an effective option for acute treatment of migraine, and a highly relevant, practical option for migraine prevention.

The fifth cranial nerve in headaches

The fifth cranial nerve is the common denominator for many headaches and facial pain pathologies currently known. Projecting from the trigeminal ganglion, in a bipolar manner, it connects to the brainstem and supplies various parts of the head and face with sensory innervation. In this review, we describe the neuroanatomical structures and pathways implicated in the sensation of the trigeminal system. Furthermore, we present the current understanding of several primary headaches, painful neuropathies and their pharmacological treatments. We hope that this overview can elucidate the complex field of headache pathologies, and their link to the trigeminal nerve, to a broader field of young scientists.