Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification

How frequently MRI modifies thoracolumbar fractures' classification or decision-making? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To provide the first meta-analysis of the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs) classification and decision-making.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science from inception to June 30, 2023 for studies evaluating the change in TLFs classification and treatment decisions after MRI. The studies extracted key findings, objectives, and patient population. A meta-analysis was performed for the pooled frequency of change in AO fracture classification or treatment decisions from surgical to conservative or vice versa after MRI.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included four studies comprising 554 patients. The pooled frequency of change in TLFs classification was 17% (95% CI 9-31%), and treatment decision was 22% (95% CI 11-40%). An upgrade from type A to type B was reported in 15.7% (95% CI 7.2-30.6%), and downgrading type B to type A in 1.2% (95% CI 0.17-8.3%). A change from conservative to surgery recommendation of 17% (95% CI 5.0-43%) was higher than a change from surgery to conservative 2% (95% CI 1-34%).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI can significantly change the thoracolumbar classification and decision-making, primarily due to upgrading type A to type B fractures and changing from conservative to surgery, respectively. These findings suggest that MRI could change decision-making sufficiently to justify its use for TLFs. Type A subtypes, indeterminate PLC status, and spine regions might help to predict a change in TLFs' classification. However, more studies are needed to confirm the association of these variables with changes in treatment decisions to set the indications of MRI in neurologically intact patients with TLFs. An interactive version of our analysis can be accessed from here: https://databoard.shinyapps.io/mri_spine/ .

A Critical Appraisal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma

Background and objective Thoracolumbar spine trauma (TST) is frequently associated with spinal cord injury and other soft tissue and bony injuries. The management of such injuries requires an evidence-based approach. This study used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument to assess the methodological quality of clinical guidelines for the management of TST published by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS). Methods All clinical guidelines on TST published by CNS until 2020 were assessed. Five appraisers from three international centers evaluated the quality of eligible clinical guidelines by using AGREE II. Mean AGREE II scores for each domain were determined. In higher-quality domains, the scores for individual items were analyzed. Results A total of 12 guidelines published by CNS on TST were assessed. Mean scores for all six domains were as follows: Scope and Purpose (75.2%), Stakeholder Involvement (45.4%), Rigor of Development (57.0%), Clarity of Presentation (58.7%), Applicability (16.9%), and Editorial Independence (64.1%). The mean score for the overall quality of all CNS guidelines was 52.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 52.2-53.5%]. The overall agreement among appraisers was excellent [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for each guideline ranged from 0.903 to 0.963]. Conclusions CNS guidelines for the management of TST demonstrated acceptable quality across most domains; however, the domains of Applicability and Stakeholder Involvement could be further improved in future guideline updates. The assessors concluded that all guidelines could still be recommended for clinical practice with or without modifications.

The Influence of Comminution and Posterior Ligamentous Complex Integrity on Treatment Decision Making in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit?

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the impact of vertebral body comminution and Posterior Ligamentous Complex (PLC) integrity on the treatment recommendations of thoracolumbar fractures among an expert panel of 22 spine surgeons.

METHODS

A review of 183 prospectively collected thoracolumbar burst fracture computed tomography (CT) scans by an expert panel of 22 trauma spine surgeons to assess vertebral body comminution and PLC integrity. This study is a sub-study of a prospective observational study of thoracolumbar burst fractures (Spine TL A3/A4). Each expert was asked to grade the degree of comminution and certainty about the PLC disruption from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the intact vertebral body or intact PLC and 100 representing complete comminution or complete PLC disruption, respectively.

RESULTS

≥45% comminution had a 74% chance of having surgery recommended, while <25% comminution had an 86.3% chance of non-surgical treatment. A comminution from 25 to 45% had a 57% chance of non-surgical management. ≥55% PLC injury certainity had a 97% chance of having surgery, and ≥45-55% PLC injury certainty had a 65%. <20% PLC injury had a 64% chance of having non-operative treatment. A 20 to 45% PLC injury certainity had a 56% chance of non-surgical management. There was fair inter-rater agreement on the degree of comminution (ICC .57 [95% CI 0.52-.63]) and the PLC integrity (ICC .42 [95% CI 0.37-.48]).

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that vetebral comminution and PLC integrity are major dterminant in decision making of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit. However, more objective, reliable, and accurate methods of assessment of these variables are warranted.

How Often Would MRI Change the Thoracolumbar Fracture Classification or Decision-Making Compared to CT Alone?

STUDY DESIGN

retrospective study of consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE

to analyze the frequency of change in Thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs) classification or decision-making after MRI compared by CT alone.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 244 consecutive patients with acute TLFs (T1-L5) presented to a single level 1 trauma center between 2014 and 2021. Three and 4 reviewers independently classified all fractures according to AOSpine and AOSpine injury severity score (TLAOSIS) by CT then MRI, respectively. Posterior ligamentous complex Injury (PLC) was diagnosed on CT and MRI by ≥ 2 positive CT findings and Black stripe discontinuity.

RESULTS

MRI changed AO classification in 25/244 patients (10.2%, P < .0001) due to an 8.2% upgrade from type A to type B and a 2% downgrade from type B to type A. The addition of MRI changed TL AOSIS among the 3 treatment recommendation groups in 35/244 (19.7%, 95% CI [14.9%-25.2%]. The best predictor of upgrade from type A to type B and downgrade from type B to type A was a single positive CT finding and the presence of only 2 CT signs as opposed to ≥3 signs, respectively (P < .0001 P = .03, respectively). Thoracic fractures showed a significantly higher reclassification rate than thoracolumbar and low lumbar (20% vs 10% and 0%, respectively, P = .07).

CONCLUSION

using appropriate CT/MRI criteria for PLC injury, MRI changed the AOSpine classification by 10% and TLAOSIS based treatment by 19.7%. The best predictors of fracture reclassification by MRI were the number of positive CT findings and fracture level.

Surgical management of thoracolumbar junction fractures: An evidence-based algorithm

Background

The management of thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) fractures, involving the restoring anatomical stability and biomechanics properties, still remains a challenge for neurosurgeons.Despite the high frequency of these injuries, specific treatment guidelines, set on biomechanical properties, have not yet been assumed. The present study is meant to propose an evidence-based treatment algorithm. The primary aim for the protocol validation was the assessment of postoperative neurological recovery. The secondary objectives concerned the evaluation of residual deformity and rate of hardware failure. Technical nuances of surgical approaches and drawbacks were further discussed.

Methods

Clinical and biomechanical data of patients harboring a single TLJ fracture, surgically managed between 2015 and 2020, were collected. Patients' cohorts were ranked into 4 groups according to Magerl's Type, McCormack Score, Vaccaro PLC point, Canal encroachment, and Farcy Sagittal Index. The outcome measures were the early/late Benzel-Larson Grade and postoperative kyphosis degree to estimate neurological status and residual deformity, respectively.

Results

32 patients were retrieved, 7, 9, 8, and 8 included within group 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Overall neurological outcomes significantly improved for all patients at every follow-up stage (p ​< ​0.0001). Surgeries gained a complete restoration of post-traumatic kyphosis in the entire cohort (p ​< ​0.0001), except for group 4 which experienced a later worsening of residual deformity.

Conclusions

The choice of the most appropriate surgical approach for TLJ fractures is dictated by morphological and biomechanical characteristics of fracture and the grade of neurological involvement. The proposed surgical management protocol was reliable and effective, although further validations are needed.

Thoracolumbar Injury: The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scoring System or Modified Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) scoring system with its modified (mTLICS) version based on their agreement with the surgeon's opinion regarding treatment for patients with thoracolumbar injuries. Moreover, the Posterior Ligamentous Complex health was compared between intraoperative examinations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports.

METHODS

MRI was obtained from 114 patients suffering thoracolumbar spinal trauma; the TLICS and mTLICS scores were measured. Approaches 1 and 2 were designed in both scoring systems based on assuming a total score of 4 as surgery and conservative management indication, respectively. Kappa was used to estimate the agreements between each approach and the surgeon's opinion on treatment. The receiver operating curve calculated the appropriate cut-off scores for the above systems over which surgical management was preferred. A P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

All the approaches showed moderate agreements with the surgeon's opinion on therapeutic management (TLICS: κ_approach1 = 0.557, κ_approach2 =0.508; mTLICS: κ_approach1 = 0.557, κ_approach2 = 0.551; P < 0.001 for each κ). A score >3.5 best illustrated the indication for surgery in both systems. The radiology report agreed stronger with intraoperatively observed ligamentous health when suspicious cases on MRI were reported as injured (κ_TLICS = 0.830, κ_mTLICS = 0.704) rather than healthy (κ_TLICS = 0.620, κ_mTLICS = 0.620).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgeon's treatment plan agreed moderately with suggestions of the TLICS and mTLICS systems; surgery was the preferred management for the patients with a score of 4. Moreover, radiologic suspicion of Posterior Ligamentous Complex injury seemed to indicate a damaged ligament rather than a healthy one.

Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injuries of the Thoracolumbar Spine: Importance and Surgical Implications

The soft tissues surrounding the spine play a primordial role in its stability, the most important of which are located posteriorly and are deemed the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC). Injuries to the PLC in the setting of thoracolumbar trauma are often dreaded and little attention has been given to them in the management protocols of thoracolumbar trauma. This review aims to summarize and contextualize current concepts in PLC injuries of the thoracolumbar spine with the aim to provide a clear guide for clinical management.

Injuries to the PLC may be suspected on the clinical exam but are often missed, leading to serious complications, including instability and neurological compromise. The diagnosis is often made indirectly by spinal radiographs and CT-scanning or by direct visualization of soft tissues via magnetic resonance imaging. The latter remains the standard imaging modality and is mandatory for patients with a high suspicion of PLC injury. PLC injuries are associated with vertebral fractures and follow a progressive pattern of severity, depending on the mechanism of injury and extent of trauma. Surgical management is warranted, as PLC damage renders the spine unstable. Although fusion was once the standard of care and remains applicable for certain patients, recent endeavors of temporary spinal fixation without fusion are increasingly gaining traction in patients with PLC injuries.

In conclusion, PLC injuries are challenging as they are often missed, poorly understood, and are not easily managed. Proper diagnosis and management are crucial to avoid long-standing complications such as spinal instability. Considering the paucity of available data on such an important topic in thoracolumbar trauma, this review article aims to contextualize current concepts in PLC injuries in order to demystify this sparsely covered subject.

The reliability of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System in children: an international validation study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System and if it is reliable and reproducible when applied to the paediatric population globally.

METHODS

A total of 12 paediatric orthopaedic surgeons were asked to review MRI and CT imaging of 25 paediatric patients with thoracolumbar spine traumatic injuries, in order to determine the classification of the lesions observed. The evaluators classified injuries into primary categories: A, B and C. Interobserver reliability was assessed for the initial reading by Fleiss's kappa coefficient (k_F) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For A and B type injuries, sub-classification was conducted including A0-A4 and B1-B2 subtypes. Interobserver reliability across subclasses was assessed using Krippendorff's alpha (α_k) along with bootstrapped 95% CIs. A second round of classification was performed one-month later. Intraobserver reproducibility was assessed for the primary classifications using Fleiss's kappa and sub-classification reproducibility was assessed by Krippendorff's alpha (α_k) along with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

In total, 25 cases were read for a total of 300 initial and 300 repeated evaluations. Adjusted interobserver reliability was almost perfect (kF = 0.74; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.78) across all observers. Sub-classification reliability was substantial (α_k= 0.67; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.81), Adjusted intraobserver reproducibility was almost perfect (kF = 0.91; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.99) for both primary classifications and for sub-classifications (α_k = 0.88; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.93).

CONCLUSION

The inter- and intraobserver reliability for the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System was high amongst paediatric orthopaedic surgeons. The AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System is a promising option as a uniform fracture classification in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Retrospective Evaluation of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Thoracolumbar AO Spine Injury Scores for the Decision Treatment of Thoracolumbar Traumatic Fractures in 458 Consecutive Patients

BACKGROUND

Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (TLICS) score and Thoracolumbar AO Spine Injury Score (TLAOSIS) are the scores preferred to classify and treat thoracolumbar fractures. Our study evaluates the reliability of both as guidelines for treatment.

METHODS

Single-center and retrospective case series of 458 patients. Clinical variables, radiology, and treatment were analyzed. We classified fractures according to the AO Spine Thoracolumbar System and retrospectively applied both scales in 2 groups (surgical and conservative). A concordance analysis and statistical measures comparing both were performed.

RESULTS

The patients were divided as follows: 257 patients (56.1%) in the conservative group and 201 patients (43.9%) in the surgical group. The concordance analysis between both scales was 89.7% (95% confidence interval, 86.5%-92.3%), and the Cohen kappa coefficient was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 59%-76%). TLAOSIS had a higher tendency to classify patients in the gray zone (10.3% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001), whereas TLICS had a more conservative nature (85.2% vs. 78.4%, P = 0.01). In the surgical group, the matching decision ratio was 29.9% for TLICS and 42.8% for TLAOSIS, but differences were found in TLICS being more conservative (70.1% vs. 57.2%, P = 0.01). In the conservative group, the matching decision ratio was 98.1% for both scales, being the main difference in the gray zone for TLAOSIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Both scales have a good concordance in general, with TLICS being more conservative overall. They had rather low coincidence when predicting surgery. Because TLAOSIS placed more patients in the gray zone, we think it might be slightly better for giving surgeons more license to decide a surgical approach on certain controversial types of fractures.

Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Surgical Decision-making Using the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Score and Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score

The management of thoracolumbar burst fractures is controversial with no universally accepted treatment algorithm. Several classification and scoring systems have been developed to assist in surgical decision-making. The most widely accepted are the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) and AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Score (TL AOSIS) with both systems designed to provide a simple objective scoring criteria to guide the surgical or nonsurgical management of complex injury patterns. When used in the evaluation and treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, both of these systems result in safe and consistent patient care. However, there are important differences between the 2 systems, specifically in the evaluation of the complete burst fractures (AOSIS A4) and patients with transient neurological deficits (AOSIS N1). In these circumstances, the AOSpine system may more accurately capture and characterize injury severity, providing the most refined guidance for optimal treatment. With respect to surgical approach, these systems provide a framework for decision-making based on patient neurology and the status of the posterior tension band. Here we propose an operative treatment algorithm based on these fracture characteristics as well as the level of injury.

The Reliability of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Classification System in Children: Results of a Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the new AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system is reliable and reproducible when applied to the pediatric population.

METHODS

Nine POSNA (Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America) member surgeons were sent educational videos and schematic papers describing the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. The material also contained magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography imaging of 25 pediatric patients with thoracolumbar spine injuries organized into cases to review and classify. The evaluators classified injuries into 3 primary categories: A, B, and C. Interobserver reliability was assessed for the initial reading by Fleiss kappa coefficient (kF) along with 95% confidence interval (CI). For A and B type injuries, subclassification was conducted including A0 to A4 and B1 to B2 subtypes. Interobserver reliability across subclasses was assessed using Krippendorff alpha (αk) along with bootstrapped 95% CI. Imaging was reviewed a second time by all evaluators ~1 month later. All imaging was blinded and randomized. Intraobserver reproducibility was assessed for the primary classifications using Fleiss kappa and subclassification reproducibility was assessed by Krippendorff alpha (αk) along with 95% CI. Interpretations for reliability estimates were based on Landis and Koch (1977): 0 to 0.2, slight; 0.2 to 0.4, fair; 0.4 to 0.6, moderate; 0.6 to 0.8, substantial; and >0.8, almost perfect agreement.

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases were read for a total of 225 initial and 225 repeated evaluations. Adjusted interobserver reliability was almost perfect (kF=0.82; CI, 0.77-0.87) across all raters. Subclassification reliability was substantial (αK=0.79; CI, 0.62-0.90). Adjusted intraobserver reproducibility was almost perfect (kF=0.81; CI, 0.71-0.90) for both primary classifications and for subclassifications (αk=0.81; CI, 0.73-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury slassification System was high amongst POSNA surgeons when applied to pediatric patients. Given a lack of a uniform classification in the pediatric population, the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system has the potential to be used as the first universal spine fracture classification in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Functional Outcome of Surgical versus Conservative Therapy in Patients with Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures and Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score of 4; A Non-randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of surgical intervention to conservative treatment in patients with thoracolumbar fracture and thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) of 4.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with TLICS 4 were enrolled in this non-randomized clinical trial. Based on clinical symptoms and radiologic findings, patients were considered under surgical or conservative treatments. The JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 months after treatment. A 20-point improvement from the baseline JOABPEQ scores was considered as clinical success in both the conservative and surgery groups. Additionally, residual canal, angulations and height loss were determined in all patients.

RESULTS

Eight patients received conservative and 17 surgical treatment. Both study groups were comparable regarding the baseline characteristics. Both study demonstrated treatment success, regarding functional recovery when compared to baseline (p<0.001). However, those undergoing surgical intervention had significantly better JOABPEQ score (p<0.001) and higher residual canal (p=0.042) when compared to those receiving conservative therapy. The success rate of treatment was comparable between the two study groups in 6- (p=0.998) and 12-month (p=0.852) intervals; however, surgical therapy had significantly higher success arte in 3-month interval (p=0.031).

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed that surgical treatment was preferred more in comparison to conservative treatment in patients with TLICS 4. Additionally, residual canal might be a modifying factor to decide the ideal therapeutic approach.

Surgical treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective review of 101 cases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of vertebral stabilisation after acute traumatic thoracolumbar fractures, correlating the outcome with patient clinical data, type and location of fracture, presence of neurological damage, timing of surgical intervention and number of instrumented levels. The results have been evaluated also through the AO classification and AOSIS score.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 101 patients with traumatic thoracolumbar injuries from T3 to L5 operated 2011-2016 by posterior or antero-posterior fixation. The demographic data, trauma dynamics, number and type of fractures, associated lesions, timing of surgery, hospital stay, AOSIS score, RKA, SF-36 and ODI scores, pre- and post-operative neurological condition (ASIA grade), possible complications and re-interventions were evaluated for each patient.

RESULTS

Fractures mainly involved the region between T11 and L2. The probability of medullary involvement increases with the increase in severity of the main fracture type with no relation with the vertebral region. Type B and C fractures were common in the thoracic region and rare in the thoracolumbar junction. ODI and SF-36 scores were significantly better in patients with a lower AOSIS score, specifically in lesions classified as type A, amyelic and with no comorbidity. No difference was found in the clinical scores between thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures, nor between male and female patients. None of the 10 patients with ASIA A lesion at presentation achieved any degree of recovery: 50% of them had a thoracic lesion. Re-intervention rate was 15%. Hospital stay was significantly higher in patients with type C fractures, and complication rate was on average 14% (7% in type A fractures, 16% in B and 25% in C).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the validity of the posterior approach in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Outcomes and complication risks are related to fracture severity. Surgical treatment can be recommended even with an AOSIS score of two or three. The combined antero-posterior approach could be useful in cases with LSC > 8, especially in the thoracolumbar region. The degree of neurological recovery depends on fracture type, location, ASIA score and presence of comorbidities. Early intervention in myelic patients allows for a better prognosis. Level of evidence III retrospective case series.

The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A comparative study with the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score in children

Background:

There is no uniform classification in the pediatric population for thoracolumbar (TL) fractures, nor any operative guidelines. This study evaluates the AOSpine TL spine injury classification in the pediatric population and compares it to the thoracolumbar injury classification system (TLICS), which has previously been validated in pediatric spine trauma.

Methods:

Twenty-eight patients with operative TL injuries were identified from 2006 to 2016. Inclusion criteria included available imaging, operative records, age <18, and posterior approach. Each case was classified by AOSpine TL spine injury classification and TLICS. Each classification was compared to documented intraoperative posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity as well as each other.

Results:

Utilizing the AOSpine TL spine injury classification, 7 patients had type A injuries, 15 patients had type B injuries, and 6 patients had type C injuries; 21 patients had injuries classified as involving the PLC. Using TLICS, 16 patients had burst fractures, 6 patients had distraction injuries, and 6 patients had translation injuries; 21 patients had injuries classified as involving the PLC. Spearman correlation analysis substantiated convergence of AOSpine TL spine injury classification scores to TLICS scores (r = 0.75; 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.51 to 0.98; P < .001). Concordance between PLC integrity by each classification and intraoperative evaluation was 96% (27/28) of cases (k = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.08). Neurologic status was 100% concordant between the AOSpine TL spine injury classification and TLICS.

Conclusion:

There is high statistical correlation between the AOSpine TL spine injury classification and TLICS, and to intraoperative evaluation of the PLC, suggesting that the AOSpine TL spine injury classification is applicable to the pediatric population.

Level of evidence:

III.

Reliability and Validity of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

The AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification system (ATLICS) is a relatively simple yet comprehensive classification of spine injuries introduced in 2013. This systematic review summarizes the evidence on measurement properties of this new classification, particularly the reliability and validity of the main morphologic injury types with and without inclusion of the subtypes.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase in September 2016. A revised version of the COSMIN checklist was used for evaluation of the quality of studies. Two independent reviewers performed all steps of the review.

RESULTS

Nine articles were included in the final review, all of which evaluated the reliability of the ATLICS and had a fair methodological quality. The reliability of the modifiers was unknown. Overall, the quality of evidence for reliability of the morphologic and neurologic classification sections was low. However, there was moderate evidence for poor interobserver reliability of the morphologic classification when all subtypes were included, and moderate evidence for good intraobserver reliability with exclusion of subtypes. The reliability of the morphologic classification was independent of the observer's experience and cultural background.

CONCLUSIONS

ATLICS represents the most current system for evaluation of thoracolumbar injuries. Based on this review, further studies with robust methodological quality are needed to evaluate the measurement properties of ATLICS. Shortcomings of the reliability studies are discussed.

A Case of Delayed Paraplegia Following Missed Diagnosis on Computed Tomography

There are many proposed classification systems for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures (TLF). More recently published are the AO Spine Classification System and the Thoraco-Lumbar Injury Classification System (TLICS). There has been a paucity of high-level evidence to link these classification system subtypes with clinical outcomes and/or management strategies. Previously, post-traumatic burst fractures or two column injuries identified on computed tomography (CT) scan have been deemed stable injuries. The addition of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation for concomitant ligamentous injuries in cases of incomplete burst fractures has been widely debated without high-level evidence. In this report, we present a case of an incomplete burst fracture at L1, AO-A3, which did not receive an MRI and presented with delayed paraplegia four weeks later.

Percutaneous fixation of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures

Surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fracture without neurological deficit is still controversial.

Management of vertebral fracture with percutaneous fixation was first reported in 2004.

Advantages of percutaneous fixation are: less tissue dissection; decreased post-operative pain; decreased bleeding and operative time (depending on the steep learning curve); better screw positioning with fluoroscopy compared with an open freehand technique; and a decreased infection rate.

The limitations of percutaneous fixation of vertebral fractures include increased radiation exposure to the patient and the surgeon, together with the steep learning curve for this technique.

Adding a screw at the level of the fractured vertebra has the advantages of incorporating fewer motion segments with less operative time and bleeding. This also increases the axial, sagittal and torsional stiffness of the construct.

Percutaneous fixation alone without grafting is sufficient for treating type A and B1 (AO classification) thoracolumbar fractures with satisfactory results concerning kyphosis reduction when compared with open instrumentation and fusion and with open fixation.

Type C and B2 fractures (ligamentous injuries) should undergo fusion since the ligamentous healing is mechanically weak, increasing the risk of instability.

This review offers a detailed description of percutaneous screw insertion and discusses the advantages and disadvantages.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:604-613. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170026.

Instrumented Circumferential Fusion in Two Stages for Instable Lumbar Fracture: Long-Term Results of a Series of 74 Patients on Sagittal Balance and Functional Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To report the radiologic and functional results of a multicenter, prospective case series of patients with comminuted lumbar fractures treated with 2-stage circumferential arthrodesis.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective case series of 74 patients with comminuted lumbar fractures was analyzed. The strategy entailed initial posterior osteosynthesis, followed by physical replacement with an expandable titanium cage filled with autologous bone via retroperitoneal lumbotomy. The mechanism of lesion formation and epidemiologic characteristics were recorded. Clinical and quality-of-life analyses (visual analog scale [VAS], Oswesty Disability Index [ODI], Short Form 12 [SF-12]) were performed over a minimum observation period of 1 year. Radiologic parameters, including deformity measurements, were recorded at each evaluation. Fusion was analyzed by means of a 1-year monitoring scan.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 38.1 years, and median duration of follow-up was 2.1 years (interquartile range, 1.3-2.9). The distribution of fractures according to the Magerl classification scheme was as follows: A, 64.8%; B, 16.7%; C, 18.5%. At the last follow-up, fusion was considered certain in 57 cases (77%). The mean VAS score was 2.1 ± 1.3, mean ODI was 14.7 ± 8.0, mean SF-12 Physical Component Summary score was 43.2 ± 9.3, and mean SF-12 Mental Component Summary score was 50.8 ± 5.9. Correction of the regional sagittal deformity was significant during the postoperative period, with a mean increase in lordosis of 9.0° (P < 0.0001). The loss of mean correction at the last follow-up (-2.9°) was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Circumferential arthrodesis, including posterior osteosynthesis and physical replacement with an expandable cage and autologous graft, is applicable to the treatment of comminuted lumbar fractures. A high rate of fusion was obtained with significant and long-lasting correction of the sagittal deformity. Functional scores measured at 1 year suggest mild disability. The ODI, SF-12, and VAS scores were positively correlated with fusion at the last follow-up.