Epidemiology of Gunshot-Related Spinal Injuries and Related Risk Factors for In-Hospital Mortality in the United States from 2015-2019: A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis

Firearm injuries in the U.S. pose a significant public health burden, but data on gunshot wounds (GSWs) specifically involving the spine are scarce. We examined epidemiological trends in GSWs to the spine and associated spinal cord injury (SCI) and mortality rates. This was a cross-sectional study of data from level I-III trauma centers in the U.S. participating in the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank (ACS NTDB) in 2015-2019. We identified adult and pediatric patients presenting with GSW and evaluated those with Abbreviated Injury Scale codes indicating spinal involvement and SCI. We assessed in-hospital mortality and GSW-related SCI. A total of 5,021,316 patients were enrolled in the ACS NTDB. Of the 107,233 patients (2.1% of total) presenting with GSW, 9023 (8.4%) patients had spine involvement. Overall rates of GSW and spinal GSW were similar across years. The most common cause of spinal GSW injury was assault (86.7%). The cervical spine was involved in 24.2% of patients, thoracic spine in 42.8%, and lumbar spine in 39.7%. Cervical SCI was present in 8.7% of all spinal GSW (35.7% of cervical GSW), thoracic SCI in 17.4% (40.6% of thoracic GSW), and lumbar SCI in 8.1% (20.3% of lumbar GSW). The mean patient age was 29.0 ± 12.2 years, 88.5% were male, 62.4% were black, 23.7% were white, and 13.9% were another race. Blood alcohol content was ≥0.08 in 12.1%, and illicit drugs were positive in 24.4%. In-hospital mortality was high in patients with spinal GSWs (8.1%), and mortality was significantly higher with cervical involvement (18.1%), cervical SCI (30.7%), or thoracic incomplete SCI (13.6%) on univariate analysis. On multi-variate analysis of age (excluding patients <16 years of age), sex, Injury Severity Score (ISS), complete SCI, and spinal area of involvement, only greater patient age (age 40-65 years: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-2.11, p = 0.014; age >65 years: aOR 3.90, 95% CI 2.10-7.27, p < 0.001) and higher ISS (ISS 9-15: aOR 6.65, 95% CI 2.38-18.54, p < 0.001; ISS 16-24: aOR 18.13, 95% CI 6.65-49.44, p < 0.001; ISS >24: aOR 68.44, 95% CI 25.39-184.46, p < 0.001) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality risk after spinal GSW. These results demonstrate that spinal GSW is not uncommon and that older patients with more severe systemic injuries have higher in-hospital mortality risk.

Mid-term and Long-term Outcomes After Total Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare mid-term to long-term outcomes of cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

After ACDF to treat symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease, the loss of motion at the index level due to fusion may accelerate adjacent-level disk degeneration. CDA was developed to preserve motion and reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Early-term to mid-term clinical outcomes from RCTs suggest noninferiority of CDA compared with ACDF, but it remains unclear whether CDA yields better mid-term to long-term outcomes than ACDF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs with at least 60 months of follow-up. The risk ratio or standardized mean difference (and 95% CIs) were calculated for dichotomous or continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighteen reports of 14 RCTs published in 2014-2023 were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the CDA group had a significantly greater improvement in neurological success and Neck Disability Index than the ACDF group. The ACDF group exhibited a significantly better improvement in the Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary than the CDA group. Radiographic adjacent segment degeneration was significantly lower in the CDA group at 60- and 84-month follow-ups; at 120-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Although the overall rate of secondary surgical procedures was significantly lower in the CDA group, we did not observe any significant difference at 60-month follow-up between the CDA and ACDF group and appreciated statistically significant lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery at 84-month and 108- to 120-month follow-up. The rate of adverse events and the neck and arm pain scores in the CDA group were not significantly different from those of the ACDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with 5- to 10-year follow-up data, CDA resulted in significantly better neurological success and Neck Disability Index scores and lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, secondary surgical procedures, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery than ACDF. ACDF resulted in improved Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary scores. However, the CDA and ACDF groups did not exhibit significant differences in overall changes in neck and arm pain scores or rates of adverse events.

Closed cervical traction techniques: moving into the 21st century

Closed cervical traction for reducing dislocating cervical injuries, deformity correction, or discectomy distraction has been implemented in its modern form since the 1930s. Cervical traction state of the art has not changed significantly since the 1960s, with most reductions performed by using Gardner-Wells tongs or halo traction; however, there are many limitations of traditional weight-pulley traction, including limited reduction efficacy and patient safety shortcomings. In this paper, the authors review the history of cervical traction in the 20th century and the limitations of current traction techniques and describe a novel traction device developed at the University of Utah with robotic actuator load or position control and real-time force-sensing capabilities. Preliminary biomechanical testing results using the novel device in an extension spring loading model, with intact cadavers, and in iatrogenic facet injury cadaveric models demonstrated preliminary safety and efficacy of the device. The authors believe this and future research efforts aimed toward improving the efficacy and safety of cervical traction will help advance the field into the 21st century.

A radiological analysis of pelvic fixation trajectories: patient series

BACKGROUND

Three well-defined methods for pelvic fixation are used for biomechanical support in spine fusion constructs: iliac, recessed iliac, and S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws. The authors compared the maximum screw sizes that could be placed with these techniques by using image-guidance software and high-resolution computed tomography scans from 20 randomly selected patients. Six trajectories were plotted per side, beginning at recognized starting points (standard or recessed posterior superior iliac spine [PSIS] or S2AI screw) and ending at the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) or supra-acetabular notch (SAN).

OBSERVATIONS

The mean maximum screw length and width ranged from 80.0 ± 32.2 mm to 140.8 ± 22.6 mm and from 8.25 ± 1.2 mm to 13.0 ± 2.7 mm, respectively, depending on the trajectory. Statistically significant differences in length were found between the standard and recessed PSIS trajectories to the AIIS (p < 0.001) and between the standard PSIS-to-AIIS trajectory and the S2AI-to-AIIS (p = 0.007) or S2AI-to-SAN (p < 0.001) trajectories. The most successful trajectory was the PSIS to SAN (95%, 38/40).

LESSONS

The traditional iliac screw trajectory enabled the longest and widest screw trajectories and highest rate of successful screw placement with the fewest theoretical breaches more reliably than recessed and S2AI trajectories. These findings may help surgeons plan for maximum screw purchase for pelvic fixation.

Efficacy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during the Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy

Objective The accuracy of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to detect iatrogenic nervous system injuries while they are reversible remains unknown. We evaluated a cohort of patients who had IONM during surgery to assess accuracy.

Methods Patients who underwent surgical treatment of CSM that included IONM from January 2018 through August 2018 were retrospectively identified. A standardized protocol was used for operative management. Clinical changes and postoperative neurological deficits were evaluated.

Results Among 131 patients in whom IONM was used during their procedure, 42 patients (age 58.2 ± 16.3 years, 54.8% males) showed IONM changes and 89 patients had no change. The reasons for IONM changes varied, and some patients had changes detected via multiple modalities: electromyography (n = 25, 59.5%), somatosensory-evoked potentials (n = 14, 33.3%), motor evoked potentials (n = 13, 31.0%). Three patients, all having baseline deficits before surgery, had postoperative deficits. Among the 89 patients without an IONM change, 4 showed worsened postoperative deficits, which were also seen at last follow-up. The sensitivity of IONM for predicting postoperative neurological change was 42.86% and the specificity was 68.55%. However, most patients (124, 94.7%) in whom IONM was used showed no worsened neurological deficit.

Conclusions IONM shows potential in ensuring stable postoperative neurological outcomes in most patients; however, its clinical use and supportive guidelines remain controversial. In our series, prediction of neurological deficits was poor in contrast to some previous studies. Further refinement of clinical and electrophysiological variables is needed to uniformly predict postoperative neurological outcomes.

Postoperative ileus risk after posterior thoracolumbar fusion performed with total intravenous anesthesia versus inhaled anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

There has been an increase in the use of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for intraoperative neuromonitoring during thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Although prior studies have identified risk factors for postoperative ileus (PI) after PSF, to the authors' knowledge, PI rates in patients receiving inhaled anesthetic versus TIVA have not been evaluated. In this study the authors analyzed whether TIVA is associated with greater risk of PI in PSF patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-institution cohort study, all patients undergoing PSF at the authors' tertiary academic institution from May 2014 to December 2020 were included. Patients undergoing anterior/lateral approaches or who had concurrent abdominal procedures unrelated to ileus in the same admission were excluded. PI was defined using radiographic and/or clinical diagnoses (postoperative radiographs, abdominal CT, and/or ICD-9 or -10 codes) and was confirmed via chart review. The use of TIVA or inhaled anesthetic was captured from the anesthesia record; patients were excluded if they were missing anesthesia technique data. Postoperative occurrence of PI was compared between patients who had TIVA or inhaled anesthetics while controlling for collected demographic, clinical, and surgical variables.

RESULTS

Of the 2819 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 283 (10.0%) had PI (mean ± SD age 59.3 ± 15.8 years; 155 [54.8%] male). The mean patient length of stay was 7.7 ± 5.0 days, which was significantly longer than that of patients without PI (4.9 ± 3.9 days, p < 0.001). Patients with PI had more levels fused (46% of PI patients with ≥ 5 levels fused vs 25% of non-PI patients, p < 0.001) and longer operations (6.0 ± 2.2 vs 5.4 ± 1.9 hours, p < 0.001). TIVA patients were more likely than inhalation-only patients to experience PI, but this finding did not reach significance on univariate analysis (11.0% PI rate vs 8.9%, p = 0.06). After propensity matching 125 non-PI patients and 50 PI patients by age, sex, operative time, and number of levels fused, there was a significant difference in intraoperative opiate dosing between TIVA and inhalational patients (275.7 ± 187.5 intravenous morphine milligram equivalents vs 120.9 ± 155.5, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis of PI outcome, TIVA was an independently significant predictor (OR 1.45, p = 0.02), as was anesthesia time (OR per hour increase: 1.09, p = 0.03) and ≥ 8 levels fused (OR 1.86, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of PSF patients, TIVA was associated with a higher rate of PI compared with inhaled anesthetic. This effect is likely due to higher intraoperative opiate use in these patients.

O-Arm Accuracy and Radiation Exposure in Adult Deformity Surgery

OBJECTIVE

In long thoracolumbar deformity surgery, accurate screw positioning is critical for spinal stability. We assessed pedicle and pelvic screw accuracy and radiation exposure in patients undergoing long thoracolumbar deformity fusion surgery (≥4 levels) involving 3-dimensional fluoroscopy (O-Arm/Stealth) navigation.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center cohort study, all patients aged >18 years who underwent fusion in 2016-2018 were reviewed. O-Arm images were assessed for screw accuracy. Effective radiation doses were calculated. The primary outcome was pedicle screw accuracy (Heary grade). Secondary outcomes were pelvic fixation screw accuracy, radiation exposure, and screw-related perioperative and postoperative complications or revision surgery within 3 years.

RESULTS

Of 1477 pedicle screws placed in 91 patients (mean 16.41 ± 5.6 screws/patient), 1208 pedicle screws (81.8%) could be evaluated by 3-dimensional imaging after placement. Heary Grade I placement was achieved in 1150 screws (95.2%), Grade II in 47 (3.9%), Grade III in 10 (0.82%), Grade IV in 1 (0.08%), and Grade V in 0; Grade III-V were replaced intraoperatively. One of 60 (1.6%) sacroiliac screws placed showed medial cortical breach and was replaced. The average O-Arm-related effective dose was 29.54 ± 14.29 mSv and effective dose/spin was 8.25 ± 2.65 mSv. No postoperative neurological worsening, vascular injuries, or revision surgeries for screw misplacement were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

With effective radiation doses similar to those in interventional neuroendovascular procedures, the use of O-Arm in multilevel complex deformity surgery resulted in high screw accuracy, no need for surgical revision because of screw malposition, less additional imaging, and no radiation exposure for the surgical team.

Natural history of pituitary carcinoma with metastasis to the cervical spine: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Pituitary carcinoma is a rare tumor of the adenohypophysis with noncontiguous craniospinal dissemination and/or systemic metastases. Given the rarity of this malignancy, there is limited knowledge and consensus regarding its natural history, prognosis, and optimal treatment.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors present the case of a 46-year-old woman initially treated with invasive prolactin-secreting pituitary macroadenoma who developed metastatic disease of the cervical spine 6 years later. The patient presented with acutely worsening compressive cervical myelopathy and required posterior cervical decompression, tumor resection, and instrumented arthrodesis for posterolateral fusion.

LESSONS

This case underscores the importance of long-term monitoring of hormone levels and having a high clinical suspicion for metastatic disease to the spine in patients presenting with acute myelopathy or radiculopathy in the setting of previously treated invasive secreting pituitary adenoma.

Using Frailty Measures to Predict Functional Outcomes and Mortality After Type II Odontoid Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Type II odontoid fractures occur disproportionately among elderly populations and cause significant morbidity and mortality. It is a matter of debate whether these injuries are best managed surgically or conservatively. Our goal was to identify how treatment modalities and patient characteristics correlated with functional outcome and mortality.

METHODS

We identified adult patients (>60 years) with traumatic type II odontoid fractures. We used multivariate regression controlling for patient demographics, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, modified Frailty Index (mFI-5 and mFI-11), fracture displacement, and conservative vs operative treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 59 patients (mean age 77.9 years), 24 underwent surgical intervention and 35 underwent conservative management. Operatively managed patients were younger (73.4 vs 80.6 years, P < .001) and had higher degree of fracture displacement (3.5 vs 1.0 mm, P = .002) than conservatively managed patients but no other differences in baseline characteristics. Twenty-four patients (40.7%) died within the study period (median time to death: 376 days). There were no differences between treatment groups in functional outcomes (mRS or Frankel Grade) or mortality (33.3% in operative group vs 45.7%, P = .34). There was a statistically significant correlation between higher presentation mRS score and subsequent mortality on multivariate analysis (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.04-4.10, P = .039), whereas surgical intervention, age, GCS score, CCI, mFI-5, mFI-11, sex, and fracture displacement were not significantly correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality after type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients is common. mRS score at presentation may help predict mortality more accurately than other patient factors.

L4 Corpectomy: Surgical Approaches and Mitigating the Risk of Femoral Nerve Injuries

OBJECTIVE

Because of the challenging anatomic location, corpectomies are performed less often at the fourth lumbar vertebral body than at other levels. Our objective was to review the literature of L4 corpectomy and anterior column reconstruction.

METHODS

A literature search in the Medline/PubMed database was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify all relevant cases and cases series describing corpectomies of the L4 vertebral body using "lumbar" AND "corpectomy" as search terms. We present an illustrative case to describe the technique.

RESULTS

We identified 18 articles with 30 patients who met the search criteria. Including our case illustration, the most common approach used was the lateral retroperitoneal approach (n = 17, 54.8%), of which 8 (26.7%) were performed via a transpsoas approach. Seven (23%) patients underwent corpectomy through a posterior approach, 4 (12.9%) through an anterior retroperitoneal approach, and 3 (10%) through combined anterior and lateral retroperitoneal. The overall complications rate was 19.3% including 1 case each of femoral nerve injury and iatrogenic lumbar nerve root injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Corpectomies of the L4 vertebral body are challenging. None of the various approaches described clearly demonstrates any superiority in mitigating the risk of neural complications. Decision making about which surgical approach to use should be based on patient-specific characteristics.

Neurosurgery at Pearl Harbor: Ralph Cloward’s legacy

Ralph B. Cloward (1908–2000) was the sole neurosurgeon present during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. Cloward operated on 42 patients in a span of 4 days during the attacks and was awarded a commendation signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1945 for his wartime efforts. During the attacks, he primarily treated depressed skull fractures and penetrating shrapnel wounds, but he also treated peripheral nerve and spine injuries in the aftermath. His techniques included innovative advancements such as tantalum cranioplasty plates, electromagnets for intracranial metallic fragment removal, and the application of sulfonamide antibiotic powder within cranial wounds, which had been introduced by military medics for gangrene prevention in 1939 and described for penetrating cranial wounds in 1940. Despite the severity of injuries encountered, only 2 soldiers died in the course of Cloward’s interventions. As the sole neurosurgeon in the Pacific Theater until 1944, he remained in Honolulu through World War II’s duration and gained immense operative experience through his wartime service. Here, the authors review the history of Cloward’s remarkable efforts, techniques, injury patterns treated, and legacy.

Laminectomy at T4 and T5 for Resection of Symptomatic Cavernous Malformation

Although rare, intramedullary spinal cavernous malformations have a 1.4%-6.8% annual hemorrhage risk and can cause significant morbidity.¹ Prior hemorrhage and size >1 cm are risk factors for future hemorrhage that, in addition to notable or progressive symptoms, may justify early surgical intervention.^1,2 In this video, we present key steps in surgical management of a large, symptomatic thoracic cavernous malformation. A 56-year-old woman presented with worsening lower extremity weakness, imbalance, and difficulty ambulating. Strength was 3/5 in her right lower extremity and 4/5 in her left lower extremity. She had an incomplete T4 sensory level and hyperreflexia. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a heterogeneous "popcorn"-appearing expansile intradural intramedullary 2.2- × 1.2-cm lesion at T4-5, consistent with a cavernous malformation. Angiography was deferred given the characteristic magnetic resonance imaging appearance. Given her progressive symptoms (including weakness), lesion size, and good health, resection was recommended. Using neurological monitoring, a T4-5 laminectomy, midline myelotomy, and piecemeal microsurgical resection of the lesion was performed, clearly identifying the cavernoma-spinal cord interface and avoiding spinal cord retraction. Histopathology confirmed a cavernoma. Postoperatively, the patient had improved left lower extremity strength and stable right lower extremity strength but worsened dorsiflexion (1/5), which improved with rehabilitation. At 1-year follow-up, she had full strength in her left lower extremity and 4/5 in her right lower extremity, with mild paresthesias below T10. Consistent with prior series demonstrating low complication rates and good long-term neurological outcomes,² microsurgical resection of selected symptomatic intramedullary spinal cavernous malformations can halt neurological decline and potentially improve neurological function.

Solitary manifestations of primary B-lymphoblastic lymphoma of the spine: Systematic literature review with case illustration

BACKGROUND

Given the locally destructive osteolytic nature of primary B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-LBL) of the spine, careful attention is needed to identify clinical signs and symptoms as well as radiological findings of spinal instability because these lesions may warrant resection, decompression, and instrumentation with posterolateral fusion. Our objective was to summarize the presenting symptoms, clinical features, potential treatment modalities, and clinical outcome of cases described in the literature.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic literature review to identify all relevant cases and case series describing primary manifestations B-LBL of the spine using Pubmed/Medline. We summarized the findings in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We also present a case illustration.

RESULTS

Together with our case, 9 cases of primary B-LBL of the spine were identified in 6 male and 3 female patients (age 8-58 years, median 31 years). Back pain was the most common symptom, and five patients also had neurological signs of spinal cord compression. T1-weighted MRI contrast enhancement was seen in 5 cases. Surgery was performed in 5 patients with progression of neurological deficits. Steroid treatment was also given in 3 patients preoperatively. Seven patients had chemotherapy after diagnosis. During follow-up of 1 month to 1 year, 2 cases of recurrence and 4 cases of complete remission were noted; however, with the short follow-up time, patient prognosis overall remains unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary B-LBL of the spine represents a rare clinical entity whose management mandates a multidisciplinary approach. Careful attention must be paid to the neurological status of the patient, as well as to imaging that may highlight potential local instability of the spine.

An updated management algorithm for incorporating minimally invasive techniques to treat thoracolumbar trauma

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques can effectively stabilize and decompress many thoracolumbar injuries with decreased morbidity and tissue destruction compared with open approaches. Nonetheless, there is limited direction regarding the breadth and limitations of MIS techniques for thoracolumbar injuries. Consequently, the objectives of this study were to 1) identify the range of current practice patterns for thoracolumbar trauma and 2) integrate expert opinion and literature review to develop an updated treatment algorithm.

METHODS

A survey describing 10 clinical cases with a range of thoracolumbar injuries was sent to 12 surgeons with expertise in spine trauma. The survey results were summarized using descriptive statistics, along with the Fleiss kappa statistic of interrater agreement. To develop an updated treatment algorithm, the authors used a modified Delphi technique that incorporated a literature review, the survey results, and iterative feedback from a group of 14 spine trauma experts. The final algorithm represented the consensus opinion of that expert group.

RESULTS

Eleven of 12 surgeons contacted completed the case survey, including 8 (73%) neurosurgeons and 3 (27%) orthopedic surgeons. For the 4 cases involving patients with neurological deficits, nearly all respondents recommended decompression and fusion, and the proportion recommending open surgery ranged from 55% to 100% by case. Recommendations for the remaining cases were heterogeneous. Among the neurologically intact patients, MIS techniques were typically recommended more often than open techniques. The overall interrater agreement in recommendations was 0.23, indicating fair agreement. Considering both literature review and expert opinion, the updated algorithm indicated that MIS techniques could be used to treat most thoracolumbar injuries. Among neurologically intact patients, percutaneous instrumentation without arthrodesis was recommended for those with AO Spine Thoracolumbar Classification System subtype A3/A4 (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score [TLICS] 4) injuries, but MIS posterior arthrodesis was recommended for most patients with AO Spine subtype B2/B3 (TLICS > 4) injuries. Depending on vertebral body integrity, anterolateral corpectomy or mini-open decompression could be used for patients with neurological deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Spine trauma experts endorsed a range of strategies for treating thoracolumbar injuries but felt that MIS techniques were an option for most patients. The updated treatment algorithm may provide a foundation for surgeons interested in safe approaches for using MIS techniques to treat thoracolumbar trauma.

FEBio finite element model of a pediatric cervical spine

OBJECTIVE

The underlying biomechanical differences between the pediatric and adult cervical spine are incompletely understood. Computational spine modeling can address that knowledge gap. Using a computational method known as finite element modeling, the authors describe the creation and evaluation of a complete pediatric cervical spine model.

METHODS

Using a thin-slice CT scan of the cervical spine from a 5-year-old boy, a 3D model was created for finite element analysis. The material properties and boundary and loading conditions were created and model analysis performed using open-source software. Because the precise material properties of the pediatric cervical spine are not known, a published parametric approach of scaling adult properties by 50%, 25%, and 10% was used. Each scaled finite element model (FEM) underwent two types of simulations for pediatric cadaver testing (axial tension and cardinal ranges of motion [ROMs]) to assess axial stiffness, ROM, and facet joint force (FJF). The authors evaluated the axial stiffness and flexion-extension ROM predicted by the model using previously published experimental measurements obtained from pediatric cadaveric tissues.

RESULTS

In the axial tension simulation, the model with 50% adult ligamentous and annulus material properties predicted an axial stiffness of 49 N/mm, which corresponded with previously published data from similarly aged cadavers (46.1 ± 9.6 N/mm). In the flexion-extension simulation, the same 50% model predicted an ROM that was within the range of the similarly aged cohort of cadavers. The subaxial FJFs predicted by the model in extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were in the range of 1-4 N and, as expected, tended to increase as the ligament and disc material properties decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

A pediatric cervical spine FEM was created that accurately predicts axial tension and flexion-extension ROM when ligamentous and annulus material properties are reduced to 50% of published adult properties. This model shows promise for use in surgical simulation procedures and as a normal comparison for disease-specific FEMs.

Spinal Cord Injury Management on the Front Line: ABCs of Spinal Cord Injury Treatment Based on American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines and Common Sense

Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects approximately 54 per 1 million people annually in the United States. Treatment strategies for this patient population focus on initial stabilization and early intervention. The cornerstones of early management are clinical assessment, characterization of the injury, medical optimization, and definitive surgical treatment, including surgical stabilization and/or decompression. This article discusses the important strategies in caring for patients with SCI that are supported with significant literature.

Lateral Suboccipital Craniotomy With C1-C2 Hemilaminectomies and C1-C3 Fusion for the Treatment of a C1-C2 Synovial Cyst Causing Spinal Cord Compression: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

Atlantoaxial synovial cysts are a rare cause of cervical myelopathy. Here we describe a case of a 26-yr-old woman who presented with progressively decreasing right arm and leg strength and associated gait imbalance. On examination, she had diffuse weakness in the right upper and lower extremities, a positive right-sided Hoffman sign, and clonus in the right lower extremity. Computed tomography demonstrated an os odontoideum and a retro-odontoid cyst. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a T1 hypointense, T2 hyperintense, slightly rim-enhancing retro-odontoid cyst causing a marked narrowing of the spinal canal, with resultant flattening and leftward deviation of the spinal cord. The patient consented to undergo cyst fenestration via a right suboccipital craniotomy and right C1-C2 hemilaminectomies, along with a C1-C3 instrumented posterior spinal fusion. This approach was chosen because it allows for cyst fenestration and instrumentation of the hypermobile cervical spine within the same incision. After the dura was opened and the arachnoid was dissected, the cyst was visualized compressing the spinal cord. The cyst was fenestrated just inferior to the C1 nerve rootlets, resulting in immediate egress of a gelatinous content; thereafter, all accessible cyst wall portions were removed. Fusion was performed with lateral mass screws at C1 and C3 and pars screws at C2. Pathological analysis described the cyst content as reactive fibrovascular tissue with cholesterol deposition. There were no complications associated with the procedure, and the patient's right-sided weakness had nearly resolved by postoperative day 1. Patient consent was granted for publication.

Febio finite element models of the human cervical spine

Finite element (FE) analysis has proven to be useful when studying the biomechanics of the cervical spine. Although many FE studies of the cervical spine have been published, they typically develop their models using commercial software, making the sharing of models between researchers difficult. They also often model only one part of the cervical spine. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate three FE models of the adult cervical spine using open-source software and to freely provide these models to the scientific community. The models were created from computed tomography scans of 26-, 59-, and 64-year old female subjects. These models were evaluated against previously published experimental and FE data. Despite the fact that all three models were assigned identical material properties and boundary conditions, there was notable variation in their biomechanical behavior. It was therefore apparent that these differences were the result of morphological differences between the models.

Finite element modeling to compare craniocervical motion in two age-matched pediatric patients without or with Down syndrome: implications for the role of bony geometry in craniocervical junction instability

OBJECTIVE

Instability of the craniocervical junction (CCJ) is a well-known finding in patients with Down syndrome (DS); however, the relative contributions of bony morphology versus ligamentous laxity responsible for abnormal CCJ motion are unknown. Using finite element modeling, the authors of this study attempted to quantify those relative differences.

METHODS

Two CCJ finite element models were created for age-matched pediatric patients, a patient with DS and a control without DS. Soft tissues and ligamentous structures were added based on bony landmarks from the CT scans. Ligament stiffness values were assigned using published adult ligament stiffness properties. Range of motion (ROM) testing determined that model behavior most closely matched pediatric cadaveric data when ligament stiffness values were scaled down to 25% of those found in adults. These values, along with those assigned to the other soft-tissue materials, were identical for each model to ensure that the only variable between the two was the bone morphology. The finite element models were then subjected to three types of simulations to assess ROM, anterior-posterior (AP) translation displacement, and axial tension.

RESULTS

The DS model exhibited more laxity than the normal model at all levels for all of the cardinal ROMs and AP translation. For the CCJ, the flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and AP translation values predicted by the DS model were 40.7%, 52.1%, 26.1%, and 39.8% higher, respectively, than those for the normal model. When simulating axial tension, the soft-tissue structural stiffness values predicted by the DS and normal models were nearly identical.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased laxity exhibited by the DS model in the cardinal ROMs and AP translation, along with the nearly identical soft-tissue structural stiffness values exhibited in axial tension, calls into question the previously held notion that ligamentous laxity is the sole explanation for craniocervical instability in DS.

Restabilization of the Occipitocervical Junction After a Complete Unilateral Condylectomy: A Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Fixation Techniques

BACKGROUND

Occipitocervical instability may result from transcondylar resection of the occipital condyle. Initially, patients may be able to maintain a neutral alignment but severe occipitoatlantal subluxation may subsequently occur, with cranial settling, spinal cord kinking, and neurological injury.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of posterior fixation constructs to prevent progression to severe deformity after radical unilateral condylectomy.

METHODS

Eight human cadaveric specimens (Oc-C2) underwent biomechanical testing to compare stiffness under physiological loads (1.5 N m). A complete unilateral condylectomy was performed to destabilize one Oc-C1 joint, and the contralateral joint was left intact. Unilateral Oc-C1 or Oc-C2 constructs on the resected side and bilateral Oc-C1 or Oc-C2 constructs were tested.

RESULTS

The bilateral Oc-C2 construct provided the greatest stiffness, but the difference was only statistically significant in certain planes of motion. The unilateral constructs had similar stiffness in lateral bending, but the unilateral Oc-C1 construct was less stiff in axial rotation and flexion-extension than the unilateral Oc-C2 construct. The bilateral Oc-C2 construct was stiffer than the unilateral Oc-C2 construct in axial rotation and lateral bending, but there was no difference between these constructs in flexion-extension.

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo a complete unilateral condylectomy require close surveillance for occipitocervical instability. A bilateral Oc-C2 construct provides suitable biomechanical strength, which is superior to other constructs. A unilateral construct decreases abnormal motion but lacks the stiffness of a bilateral construct. However, given that most patients undergo a partial condylectomy and only a small proportion of patients develop instability, there may be scenarios in which a unilateral construct may be appropriate, such as for temporary internal stabilization.

The Impact of Preoperative Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: 3-Month and 12-Month Results of a Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

We previously reported inpatient and 30-day postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of a controlled, noncrossover pilot study using preoperative mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) training for lumbar spine surgery. Our goal here was to assess 3-month and 12-month postoperative PROs of preoperative MBSR in lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease.

METHODS

Intervention group participants were prospectively enrolled in a preoperative online MBSR course. A comparison standard care only group was one-to-one matched retrospectively by age, sex, surgery type, and prescription opioid use. Three-month and 12-month postoperative PROs for pain, disability, quality of life, and opioid use were compared within and between groups. Regression models were used to assess whether MBSR use predicted outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-four participants were included in each group. At 3 months, follow-up was 87.5% and 95.8% in the comparison and intervention groups, respectively. In the intervention group, mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) was significantly higher, whereas mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly lower. The change from baseline in mean PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI was significantly greater than in the comparison group. At 12 months, follow-up was 58.3% and 83.3% in the comparison and intervention groups, respectively. In the intervention group, mean PROMIS-PI was significantly lower and change in mean PROMIS-PI from baseline was significantly greater. MBSR use was a significant predictor of change in PROMIS-PF at 3 months and in PROMIS-PI at 12 months. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-month and 12-month results suggest that preoperative MBSR may have pain control benefits in lumbar spine surgery.

Minimally invasive oblique interbody fusion for correction of iatrogenic lumbar deformity

Spinal instability may arise as a consequence of decompressive lumbar surgery. An oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation can provide indirect decompression on neural elements, stabilization of mobile spondylolisthesis, and restoration of segmental lordosis. Minimally invasive techniques may facilitate a shorter hospitalization and faster recovery than a traditional open revision operation. The authors describe the use of an anterior interbody fusion via an oblique retroperitoneal approach and posterior pedicle screw fixation to treat a 67-year-old woman who developed L3–4 and L4–5 unstable spondylolisthesis after a lumbar laminectomy.

The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/KWwGMIoDrmU.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Surgical Approaches

QUESTION

Does the choice of surgical approach (anterior, posterior, or combined anterior-posterior) improve clinical outcomes in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures?

RECOMMENDATIONS

In the surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures, physicians may use an anterior, posterior, or a combined approach as the selection of approach does not appear to impact clinical or neurological outcomes. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B With regard to radiologic outcomes in the surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures, physicians may utilize an anterior, posterior, or combined approach because there is conflicting evidence in the comparison among approaches. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient With regard to complications in the surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures, physicians may use an anterior, posterior, or combined approach because there is conflicting evidence in the comparison among approaches. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient The full version of the guideline can be reviewed at: https://www.cns.org/guideline-chapters/congress-neurological-surgeons-systematic-review-evidence-based-guidelines/chapter_11.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Prophylaxis and Treatment of Thromboembolic Events

QUESTION 1

Does routine screening for deep venous thrombosis prevent pulmonary embolism (or venous thromboembolism (VTE)-associated morbidity and mortality) in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures?

RECOMMENDATION 1

There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening for deep venous thrombosis in preventing pulmonary embolism (or VTE-associated morbidity and mortality) in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient.

QUESTION 2

For patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures, is one regimen of VTE prophylaxis superior to others with respect to prevention of pulmonary embolism (or VTE-associated morbidity and mortality)?

RECOMMENDATION 2

There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific regimen of VTE prophylaxis to prevent pulmonary embolism (or VTE-associated morbidity and mortality) in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient.

QUESTION 3

Is there a specific treatment regimen for documented VTE that provides fewer complications than other treatments in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures?

RECOMMENDATION 3

There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against a specific treatment regimen for documented VTE that would provide fewer complications than other treatments in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient.

RECOMMENDATION 4

Based on published data from pooled (cervical and thoracolumbar) spinal cord injury populations, the use of thromboprophylaxis is recommended to reduce the risk of VTE events in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures. Consensus Statement by the Workgroup The full version of the guideline can be reviewed at: https://www.cns.org/guideline-chapters/congress-neurological-surgeons-systematic-review-evidence-based-guidelines/chapter_7.

The atlantoaxial capsular ligaments and transverse ligament are the primary stabilizers of the atlantoaxial joint in the craniocervical junction: a finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

Prior studies have provided conflicting evidence regarding the contribution of key ligamentous structures to atlantoaxial (AA) joint stability. Many of these studies employed cadaveric techniques that are hampered by the inherent difficulties of testing isolated-injury scenarios. Analysis with validated finite element (FE) models can overcome some of these limitations. In a previous study, the authors completed an FE analysis of 5 subject-specific craniocervical junction (CCJ) models to investigate the biomechanics of the occipitoatlantal joint and identify the ligamentous structures essential for its stability. Here, the authors use these same CCJ FE models to investigate the biomechanics of the AA joint and to identify the ligamentous structures essential for its stability.

METHODS

Five validated CCJ FE models were used to simulate isolated- and combined ligamentous–injury scenarios of the transverse ligament (TL), tectorial membrane (TM), alar ligament (AL), occipitoatlantal capsular ligament, and AA capsular ligament (AACL). All models were tested with rotational moments (flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending) and anterior translational loads (C2 constrained with anterior load applied to the occiput) to simulate physiological loading and to assess changes in the atlantodental interval (ADI), a key radiographic indicator of instability.

RESULTS

Isolated AACL injury significantly increased range of motion (ROM) under rotational moment at the AA joint for flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation, which increased by means of 28.0% ± 10.2%, 43.2% ± 15.4%, and 159.1% ± 35.1%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05 for all). TL removal simulated under translational loads resulted in a significant increase in displacement at the AA joint by 89.3% ± 36.6% (p < 0.001), increasing the ADI from 2.7 mm to 4.5 mm. An AACL injury combined with an injury to any other ligament resulted in significant increases in ROM at the AA joint, except when combined with injuries to both the TM and the ALs. Similarly, injury to the TL combined with injury to any other CCJ ligament resulted in a significant increase in displacement at the AA joint (significantly increasing ADI) under translational loads.

CONCLUSIONS

Using FE modeling techniques, the authors showed a significant reliance of isolated- and combined ligamentous–injury scenarios on the AACLs and TL to restrain motion at the AA joint. Isolated injuries to other structures alone, including the AL and TM, did not result in significant increases in either AA joint ROM or anterior displacement.

Analysis of an overlapping surgery policy change on costs in a high-volume neurosurgical department

OBJECTIVE

Overlapping surgery remains a controversial topic in the medical community. Although numerous studies have examined the safety profile of overlapping operations, there are few data on its financial impact. The authors assessed direct hospital costs associated with neurosurgical operations during periods before and after a more stringent overlapping surgery policy was implemented.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of nonemergency neurosurgical operations that took place during the periods from June 1, 2014, to October 31, 2014 (pre–policy change), and from June 1, 2016, to October 31, 2016 (post–policy change), by any of the 4 senior neurosurgeons authorized to perform overlapping cases during both periods. Cost data as well as demographic, surgical, and hospitalization-related variables were obtained from an institutional tool, the Value-Driven Outcomes database.

RESULTS

A total of 625 hospitalizations met inclusion criteria for cost analysis; of these, 362 occurred prior to the policy change and 263 occurred after the change. All costs were reported as a proportion of the average total hospitalization cost for the entire cohort. There was no significant difference in mean total hospital costs between the prechange and postchange period (0.994 ± 1.237 vs 1.009 ± 0.994, p = 0.873). On multivariate linear regression analysis, neither the policy change (p = 0.582) nor the use of overlapping surgery (p = 0.273) was significantly associated with higher total hospital costs.

CONCLUSIONS

A more restrictive overlapping surgery policy was not associated with a reduction in the direct costs of hospitalization for neurosurgical procedures.

Spine trauma and spinal cord injury in Utah: a geographic cohort study utilizing the National Inpatient Sample

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of hospital type and patient transfer during the treatment of patients with vertebral fracture and/or spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried to identify patients treated in Utah from 2001 to 2011 for vertebral column fracture and/or SCI (ICD-9-CM codes 805, 806, and 952). Variables related to patient transfer into and out of the index hospital were evaluated in relation to patient disposition, hospital length of stay, mortality, and cost.

RESULTS

A total of 53,644 patients were seen (mean [± SEM] age 55.3 ± 0.1 years, 46.0% females, 90.2% white), of which 10,620 patients were transferred from another institution rather than directly admitted. Directly admitted (vs transferred) patients showed a greater likelihood of routine disposition (54.4% vs 26.0%) and a lower likelihood of skilled nursing facility disposition (28.2% vs 49.2%) (p < 0.0001). Directly admitted patients also had a significantly shorter length of stay (5.6 ± 6.7 vs 7.8 ± 9.5 days, p < 0.0001) and lower total charges ($26,882 ± $37,348 vs $42,965 ± $52,118, p < 0.0001). A multivariable analysis showed that major operative procedures (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–2.0, p < 0.0001) and SCI (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6–2.8, p < 0.0001) were associated with reduced survival whereas patient transfer was associated with better survival rates (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3–0.5, p < 0.0001). A multivariable analysis of cost showed that disposition (β = 0.1), length of stay (β = 0.6), and major operative procedure (β = 0.3) (p < 0.0001) affected cost the most.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, transferred patients had lower mortality but greater likelihood for poor outcomes, longer length of stay, and higher cost compared with directly admitted patients. These results suggest some significant benefits to transferring patients with acute injury to facilities capable of providing appropriate treatment, but also support the need to further improve coordinated care of transferred patients, including surgical treatment and rehabilitation.

The occipitoatlantal capsular ligaments are the primary stabilizers of the occipitoatlantal joint in the craniocervical junction: a finite element analysis

OBJECTIVEThere is contradictory evidence regarding the relative contribution of the key stabilizing ligaments of the occipitoatlantal (OA) joint. Cadaveric studies are limited by the nature and the number of injury scenarios that can be tested to identify OA stabilizing ligaments. Finite element (FE) analysis can overcome these limitations and provide valuable data in this area. The authors completed an FE analysis of 5 subject-specific craniocervical junction (CCJ) models to investigate the biomechanics of the OA joint and identify the ligamentous structures essential for stability.METHODSIsolated and combined injury scenarios were simulated under physiological loads for 5 validated CCJ FE models to assess the relative role of key ligamentous structures on OA joint stability. Each model was tested in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending in various injury scenarios. Isolated ligamentous injury scenarios consisted of either decreasing the stiffness of the OA capsular ligaments (OACLs) or completely removing the transverse ligament (TL), tectorial membrane (TM), or alar ligaments (ALs). Combination scenarios were also evaluated.RESULTSAn isolated OACL injury resulted in the largest percentage increase in all ranges of motion (ROMs) at the OA joint compared with the other isolated injuries. Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation significantly increased by 12.4% ± 7.4%, 11.1% ± 10.3%, 83.6% ± 14.4%, and 81.9% ± 9.4%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05 for all). Among combination injuries, OACL+TM+TL injury resulted in the most consistent significant increases in ROM for both the OA joint and the CCJ during all loading scenarios. OACL+AL injury caused the most significant percentage increase for OA joint axial rotation.CONCLUSIONSThese results demonstrate that the OACLs are the key stabilizing ligamentous structures of the OA joint. Injury of these primary stabilizing ligaments is necessary to cause OA instability. Isolated injuries of TL, TM, or AL are unlikely to result in appreciable instability at the OA joint.

Delayed Occipitocervical Instability With Cranial Settling After Far-Lateral Transcondylar Surgery for Invasive Skull Base Tumor

BACKGROUND

Occipitocervical instability is a rare but potentially severe complication of a far-lateral transcondylar surgical approach to the skull base.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of clinically significant occipitocervical instability after transcondylar surgery via a far-lateral approach and to determine whether the extent of occipital condyle resection relative to the hypoglossal canal was associated with the development of occipitocervical instability.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing far-lateral transcondylar surgery was performed at our institution to identify patients who developed postoperative occipitocervical instability.

RESULTS

Of the 61 far-lateral transcondylar operations performed, the authors identified 2 cases of delayed occipitocervical instability after surgery. In each case, the patient had tumor invading into the occipital condyle and supracondylar region and a resection extending anterior to the hypoglossal canal was performed. Both patients presented with pathological fractures and a severe occipitocervical deformity.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have tumor involvement of the occipital condyle and supracondylar region and undergo partial unilateral condylar resection are at risk for occipitocervical instability and should be considered for occipitocervical fusion.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Classification of Injury

QUESTION 1

Are there classification systems for fractures of the thoracolumbar spine that have been shown to be internally valid and reliable (ie, do these instruments provide consistent information between different care providers)?

RECOMMENDATION 1

A classification scheme that uses readily available clinical data (eg, computed tomography scans with or without magnetic resonance imaging) to convey injury morphology, such as Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale or the AO Spine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System, should be used to improve characterization of traumatic thoracolumbar injuries and communication among treating physicians. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B.

QUESTION 2

In treating patients with thoracolumbar fractures, does employing a formally tested classification system for treatment decision-making affect clinical outcomes?

RECOMMENDATION 2

There is insufficient evidence to recommend a universal classification system or severity score that will readily guide treatment of all injury types and thereby affect outcomes. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient The full version of the guideline can be reviewed at: https://www.cns.org/guideline-chapters/congress-neurological-surgeons-systematic-review-evidence-based-guidelines/chapter_2.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Radiological Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Radiological evaluation of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures is used to classify the injury and determine the optimal treatment plan. Currently, there remains a lack of consensus regarding appropriate radiological protocol. Most clinicians use a combination of plain radiographs, 3-dimensional computed tomography with reconstructions, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

OBJECTIVE

To determine, through evidence-based guidelines review: (1) whether the use of MRI to identify ligamentous integrity predicted the need for surgical intervention; and (2) if there are any radiological findings that can assist in predicting clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the National Library of Medicine/PubMed database and the Cochrane Library for studies relevant to thoracolumbar trauma. Clinical studies specifically addressing the radiological evaluation of thoracolumbar spine trauma were selected for review.

RESULTS

Two of 2278 studies met inclusion criteria for review. One retrospective review (Level III) and 1 prospective cohort (Level III) provided evidence that the addition of an MRI scan in acute thoracic and thoracolumbar trauma can predict the need for surgical intervention. There was insufficient evidence that MRI can help predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute traumatic thoracic and thoracolumbar spine injuries.

CONCLUSION

This evidence-based guideline provides a Grade B recommendation that radiological findings in patients with acute thoracic or thoracolumbar spine trauma can predict the need for surgical intervention. This evidence-based guideline provides a grade insufficient recommendation that there is insufficient evidence to determine if radiographic findings can assist in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute thoracic and thoracolumbar spine injuries.

QUESTION 1

Are there radiographic findings in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures that can predict the need for surgical intervention?

RECOMMENDATION 1

Because MRI has been shown to influence the management of up to 25% of patients with thoracolumbar fractures, providers may use MRI to assess posterior ligamentous complex integrity, when determining the need for surgery. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B.

QUESTION 2

Are there radiographic findings in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures that can assist in predicting clinical outcomes?

RECOMMENDATION 2

Due to a paucity of published studies, there is insufficient evidence that radiographic findings can be used as predictors of clinical outcomes in thoracolumbar fractures. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient The full version of the guideline can be reviewed at: https://www.cns.org/guideline-chapters/congress-neurological-surgeons-systematic-review-evidence-based-guidelines/chapter_3.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Nonoperative Care

BACKGROUND

Thoracic and lumbar burst fractures in neurologically intact patients are considered to be inherently stable, and responsive to nonsurgical management. There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal conservative treatment modality. The question remains whether external bracing is necessary vs mobilization without a brace after these injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the use of external bracing improves outcomes compared to no brace for neurologically intact patients with thoracic or lumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the National Library of Medicine PubMed database and the Cochrane Library for studies relevant to thoracolumbar trauma. Clinical studies specifically comparing external bracing to no brace for neurologically intact patients with thoracic or lumbar burst fractures were selected for review.

RESULTS

Three studies out of 1137 met inclusion criteria for review. One randomized controlled trial (level I) and an additional randomized controlled pilot study (level II) provided evidence that both external bracing and no brace equally improve pain and disability in neurologically intact patients with burst fractures. There was no difference in final clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients treated with an external brace vs no brace. One additional level IV retrospective study demonstrated equivalent clinical outcomes for external bracing vs no brace.

CONCLUSION

This evidence-based guideline provides a grade B recommendation that management either with or without an external brace is an option given equivalent improvement in outcomes for neurologically intact patients with thoracic and lumbar burst fractures. The decision to use an external brace is at the discretion of the treating physician, as bracing is not associated with increased adverse events compared to no brace.

QUESTION

Does the use of external bracing improve outcomes in the nonoperative treatment of neurologically intact patients with thoracic and lumbar burst fractures?

RECOMMENDATION

The decision to use an external brace is at the discretion of the treating physician, as the nonoperative management of neurologically intact patients with thoracic and lumbar burst fractures either with or without an external brace produces equivalent improvement in outcomes. Bracing is not associated with increased adverse events compared to not bracing. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B The full version of the guideline can be reviewed at: https://www.cns.org/guideline-chapters/congress-neurological-surgeons-systematic-review-evidence-based-guidelines/chapter_8.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment

QUESTION 1

Does the surgical treatment of burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine improve clinical outcomes compared to nonoperative treatment?

RECOMMENDATION 1

There is conflicting evidence to recommend for or against the use of surgical intervention to improve clinical outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture who are neurologically intact. Therefore, it is recommended that the discretion of the treating provider be used to determine if the presenting thoracic or lumbar burst fracture in the neurologically intact patient warrants surgical intervention. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient.

QUESTION 2

Does the surgical treatment of nonburst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine improve clinical outcomes compared to nonoperative treatment?

RECOMMENDATION 2

There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of surgical intervention for nonburst thoracic or lumbar fractures. It is recommended that the decision to pursue surgery for such fractures be at the discretion of the treating physician. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient The full version of the guideline can be reviewed at: https://www.cns.org/guideline-chapters/congress-neurological-surgeons-systematic-review-evidence-based-guidelines/chapter_1.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Neurological Assessment

QUESTION 1

Which neurological assessment tools have demonstrated internal reliability and validity in the management of patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures (ie, do these instruments provide consistent information between different care providers)?

RECOMMENDATION 1

Numerous neurologic assessment scales (Functional Independence Measure, Sunnybrook Cord Injury Scale and Frankel Scale for Spinal Cord Injury) have demonstrated internal reliability and validity in the management of patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures. Unfortunately, other contemporaneous measurement scales (ie, American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale) have not been specifically studied in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures. Strength of Recommendation: Grade C.

QUESTION 2

Are there any clinical findings (eg, presenting neurological grade/function) in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures that can assist in predicting clinical outcomes?

RECOMMENDATION 2

Entry American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade, sacral sensation, ankle spasticity, urethral and rectal sphincter function, and AbH motor function can be used to predict neurological function and outcome in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures (Table I https://www.cns.org/guideline-chapters/congress-neurological-surgeons-systematic-review-evidence-based-guidelines/chapter_4_table1). Strength of Recommendation: Grade B The full version of the guideline can be reviewed at: https://www.cns.org/guideline-chapters/congress-neurological-surgeons-systematic-review-evidence-based-guidelines/chapter_4.

Impact of a more restrictive overlapping surgery policy: an analysis of pre- and postimplementation complication rates, resident involvement, and surgical wait times at a high-volume neurosurgical department

OBJECTIVE

Recently, overlapping surgery has been a source of controversy both in the popular press and within the academic medical community. There have been no studies examining the possible effects of more stringent overlapping surgery restrictions. At the authors’ institution, a new policy was implemented that restricts attending surgeons from starting a second case until all critical portions of the first case that could require the attending surgeon’s involvement are completed. The authors examined the impact of this policy on complication rates, neurosurgical resident education, and wait times for neurosurgical procedures.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective chart review of nonemergency neurosurgical procedures performed over two periods—from June 1, 2014, to October 31, 2014 (pre–policy change) and from June 1, 2016, to October 31, 2016 (post–policy change)—by any of 4 senior neurosurgeons at a single institution who were authorized to schedule overlapping cases. Information on preoperative evaluation, patient demographics, premorbid conditions, surgical variables, and postoperative course were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Six hundred fifty-three patients met inclusion criteria for complications analysis. Of these, 378 (57.9%) underwent surgery before the policy change. On multivariable regression analysis, neither overlapping surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.072, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.710–1.620) nor the overlapping surgery policy change (OR 1.057, 95% CI 0.700–1.596) was associated with overall complication rates. Similarly, neither overlapping surgery (OR 1.472, 95% CI 0.883–2.454) nor the overlapping surgery policy change (OR 1.251, 95% CI 0.748–2.091) was associated with numbers of serious complications. After the policy change, the percentage of procedures in which the senior assistant was a postresidency fellow increased significantly, from 11.9% to 34.2% (p < 0.001). In a multiple linear regression analysis of surgery wait times, patients undergoing surgery after the policy change had significantly longer delays from the decision to operate until the actual neurosurgical procedure (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

At the authors’ institution, further restriction of overlapping surgery was not associated with a reduction in overall or serious complications. Resident involvement in neurosurgical procedures decreased significantly after the policy change, and this study suggests that wait times for neurosurgical procedures also significantly lengthened.

Chiari-related scoliosis: a single-center experience with long-term radiographic follow-up and relationship to deformity correction

OBJECTIVE Previous reports have addressed the short-term response of patients with Chiari-related scoliosis (CRS) to suboccipital decompression and duraplasty (SODD); however, the long-term behavior of the curve has not been well defined. The authors undertook a longitudinal study of a cohort of patients who underwent SODD for CRS to determine whether there are factors related to Chiari malformation (CM) that predict long-term scoliotic curve behavior and need for deformity correction. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed cases in which patients underwent SODD for CRS during a 14-year period at a single center. Clinical (age, sex, and associated disorders/syndromes) and radiographic (CM type, tonsillar descent, pBC2 line, clival-axial angle [CXA], syrinx length and level, and initial Cobb angle) information was evaluated to identify associations with the primary outcome: delayed thoracolumbar fusion for progressive scoliosis. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients were identified, but 4 were lost to follow-up and 1 underwent fusion within a year. Among the remaining 23 patients, 11 required fusion surgery at an average of 88.3 ± 15.4 months after SODD, including 7 (30%) who needed fusion more than 5 years after SODD. On univariate analysis, a lower CXA (131.5° ± 4.8° vs 146.5° ± 4.6°, p = 0.034), pBC2 > 9 mm (64% vs 25%, p = 0.06), and higher initial Cobb angle (35.1° ± 3.6° vs 22.8° ± 4.0°, p = 0.035) were associated with the need for thoracolumbar fusion. Multivariable modeling revealed that lower CXA was independently associated with a need for delayed thoracolumbar fusion (OR 1.12, p = 0.0128). CONCLUSIONS This investigation demonstrates the long-term outcome and natural history of CRS after SODD. The durability of the effect of SODD on CRS and curve behavior is poor, with late curve progression occurring in 30% of patients. Factors associated with CRS progression include an initial pBC2 > 9 mm, lower CXA, and higher Cobb angle. Lower CXA was an independent predictor of delayed thoracolumbar fusion. Further study is necessary on a larger cohort of patients to fully elucidate this relationship.

Fate of S2-Alar-Iliac Screws After 12-Month Minimum Radiographic Follow-up: Preliminary Results

BACKGROUND

S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws are 1 technique for lumbopelvic fixation to improve fusion rates across the lumbosacral junction that has gained wider acceptance. The S2AI screw crosses the cortical surfaces of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), which may improve the biomechanical strength of the instrumentation.

OBJECTIVE

To report preliminary radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent lumbopelvic fixation with S2AI screws with a minimum 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent lumbopelvic fixation with S2AI screws. Patients with computed tomography (CT) scans obtained preoperatively and ≥12 months postoperatively were reviewed to determine whether there was S2AI screw backout or breakage, periscrew lucency, or SIJ degeneration, and to assess L5-S1 fusion status.

RESULTS

Twenty-six S2AI screws in 13 patients were evaluated (mean follow-up 24.8 months [14-52 months]). Nine patients had L5-S1 interbody grafts. Partial periscrew lucency was identified in 7 S2AI screws (27%) in 5 patients (38%), and L5-S1 fusion occurred in 92% of patients. L5-S1 nonunion was seen in 1 patient (8%), who had evidence of bilateral screw loosening in the sacral portion. Four patients with screw loosening had an osseous L5-S1 fusion. No patients had radiographic evidence of progression of SIJ degeneration, experienced screw backout or breakage, required reoperation for L5-S1 nonunion, or had S2AI screw-related complication.

CONCLUSION

S2AI screws maintained their integrity without causing SIJ degeneration or major screw-related complications in this small retrospective series with short follow-up. Long-term results are needed to evaluate the durability of S2AI screws over time.