Window of Opportunity Clinical Trials to Evaluate Novel Therapies for Brain Tumors

The anti-proliferative effects of a frankincense extract in a window of opportunity phase ia clinical trial for patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Boswellic acids, active components of frankincense, suppress tumor proliferation in vitro with a strong clinical trial safety profile in patients with inflammatory diseases. We performed a Phase Ia window of opportunity trial of Boswellia serrata (B. serrata) in patients with breast cancer to evaluate its biologic activity and safety.

METHODS

Patients with invasive breast cancer were treated pre-operatively with B. Serrata (2400 mg/day PO) until the night before surgery for a median of 11 days (SD 6 days; range: 5-23 days). Paraffin-embedded sections from pretreatment diagnostic core biopsies and post-treatment surgical excisions were evaluated using a tunnel assay and immunohistochemistry staining with Ki-67 antibodies. A non-intervention retrospective control arm consisting of core and surgical tissue specimens from untreated patients was used to compare patients treated with B. Serrata. The change in proliferation and apoptosis between diagnostic core specimens and surgical specimens was compared between the control and treatment groups using a two-tailed paired t-test.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled, of which 20 received treatment, and 18 had sufficient tissue for IHC. There was an increase in percent change in proliferation from core biopsy to surgical excision in the control group (n = 18) of 54.6 ± 21.4%. In the B. serrata-treated group there was a reduction in proliferation between core biopsy and excision (n = 18) of 13.8 ± 11.7%. This difference was statistically significant between the control and B. serrata-treated groups (p = 0.008). There was no difference in change in apoptosis. There were no serious adverse events related to the drug.

CONCLUSION

Boswellia serrata inhibited breast cancer proliferation and was well-tolerated in a Phase Ia window of opportunity trial.

Brain metastasis treatment guidelines: consensus by the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery Tumor Section

Brain metastases are tumors that arise from a tumor cell originated in another organ reaching the brain through the blood. In the brain this tumor cell is capable of growing and invading neighboring tissues, such as the meninges and bone. In most patients a known tumor is present when the brain lesion is diagnosed, although it is possible that the first diagnose is the brain tumor before there is evidence of cancer elsewhere in the body. For this reason, the neurosurgeon must know the management that has shown the greatest benefit for brain metastasis patients, so treatments can be streamlined and optimized. Specifically, in this document, the following topics will be developed: selection of the cancer patient candidate for surgical resection and the role of the neurosurgeon in the multidisciplinary team, the importance of immunohistological and molecular diagnosis, surgical techniques, radiotherapy techniques, treatment updates of chemotherapy and immunotherapy and management algorithms in brain metastases. With this consensus manuscript, the tumor group of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (GT-SENEC) exposes the most relevant neurosurgical issues and the fundamental aspects to harmonize multidisciplinary treatment, especially with the medical specialties that are treating or will treat these patients.

Proteostasis Modulation in Germline Missense von Hippel Lindau Disease

PURPOSE

Missense mutated von Hippel Lindau (VHL) protein (pVHL) maintains intrinsic function but undergoes proteasomal degradation and tumor initiation and/or progression in VHL disease. Vorinostat can rescue missense mutated pVHL and arrest tumor growth in preclinical models. We asked whether short-term oral vorinostat could rescue pVHL in central nervous system hemangioblastomas in patients with germline missense VHL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We administered oral vorinostat to 7 subjects (ages 46.0 ± 14.5 years) and then removed symptomatic hemangioblastomas surgically (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02108002).

RESULTS

Vorinostat was tolerated without serious adverse events by all patients. pVHL expression was elevated in neoplastic stromal cells compared with untreated hemangioblastomas from same patients. We found transcriptional suppression of downstream hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) effectors. Mechanistically, vorinostat prevented Hsp90 recruitment to mutated pVHL in vitro. The effects of vorinostat on the Hsp90-pVHL interaction, pVHL rescue, and transcriptional repression of downstream HIF effectors was independent of the location of the missense mutation on the VHL locus. We confirmed a neoplastic stromal cell-specific effect in suppression of protumorigenic pathways with single-nucleus transcriptomic profiling.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that oral vorinostat treatment in patients with germline missense VHL mutations has a potent biologic effect that warrants further clinical study. These results provide biologic evidence to support the use of proteostasis modulation for the treatment of syndromic solid tumors involving protein misfolding. Proteostasis modulation with vorinostat rescues missense mutated VHL protein. Further clinical trials are needed to demonstrate tumor growth arrest.

Moving the Pendulum for Glioblastoma Treatment: One Injection at a Time

Despite advances, glioblastoma is characterized by exceptionally high rates of recurrence and resistance to therapy. This commentary remarks on the recently published article by Maruyama et al, which reports the PMDA review of G47Δ injection for malignant glioma, in which the efficacy and safety results of G47Δ were evaluated and approval conditions clarified.

Leveraging the neurosurgical operating room for therapeutic development in NeuroOncology

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a disease with a dismal prognosis. For all the hope and promise immunotherapies and molecular targeted therapies have shown for systemic malignancies, these treatments have failed to show any promise in GBM. In this context, the paradigm of investigation of therapeutics for this disease itself must be examined and modifications considered. The unique challenge of the presence of blood-brain and blood-tumor barriers (BBB/BTB) raises questions about both the true levels of systemic drug delivery to the affected tissues. Window-of-opportunity (WoO) trials in neuro-oncology allow for proof-of-concept at the start of a classic phase I-II-III clinical trial progression. For therapeutics that do not have the ability to cross the BBB/BTB, direct delivery into tumor and/or tumor-infiltrated brain in the setting of a surgical procedure can provide a novel route of therapeutic access. These approaches permit neurosurgeons to play a greater role in therapeutic development for brain tumors.

A Window of Opportunity to Overcome Therapeutic Failure in Neuro-Oncology

Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain neoplasm and it remains one of the most difficult-to-treat human cancers despite decades of discovery and translational and clinical research. Many advances have been made in our understanding of the genetics and epigenetics of gliomas in general; yet, there remains an urgent need to develop novel agents that will improve the survival of patients with this deadly disease. What sets glioblastoma apart from all other cancers is that it develops and spreads within an organ that renders tumor cells inaccessible to most systemically administered agents because of the presence of the blood-brain barrier. Inadequate drug penetration into the central nervous system is often cited as the most common cause of trial failure in neuro-oncology, and even so-called brain-penetrant therapeutics may not reach biologically relevant concentrations in tumor cells. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel therapy is a cornerstone of drug development, but few trials for glioma therapeutics have incorporated these basic elements in an organ-specific manner. Window-of-opportunity clinical trial designs can provide early insight into the biological plausibility of a novel therapeutic strategy in the clinical setting. A variety of window-of-opportunity trial designs, which take into account the limited access to treated tissue and the challenges with obtaining pretreatment control tissues, have been used for the initial development of traditional and targeted small-molecule drugs and biologic therapies, including immunotherapies and oncolytic viral therapies. Early-stage development of glioma therapeutics should include a window-of-opportunity component whenever feasible.