Masters at work: a narrative inquiry into the experiences of mental health nurses qualifying with an undergraduate Masters degree

The rules of the game in graduate entry nursing: A longitudinal case study

BACKGROUND

Graduate Entry Nursing programmes are pre-registration nursing curricula designed for candidates who already have a health related degree. The programmes aim to attract highly motivated individuals who have a commitment to nursing and hold the cognitive abilities associated with studying in higher education including critical thinking styles and capability to study independently. These attributes are termed within the literature as "graduateness". They are viewed by some as advantages to nursing. In contrast, however, there remains widespread scepticism amongst the public and some professionals towards those who are academically educated entering nursing.

OBJECTIVES

To explore how GEN students anticipate, experience, explain and respond to attitudes which imply resistance to those who are academically educated.

DESIGN

Longitudinal case study informed by the conventions advocated by Yin (2014).

SETTINGS

School of Health Sciences in a British University.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight GEN students participated over the two year duration of their programme. Twelve clinical assessors with a minimum of four months' experience of supporting GEN students in practice.

METHODS

Students took part in individual interviews at six monthly periods which were informed by the content of diaries maintained throughout their clinical placements. Clinical assessors took part in focus group discussions. Practice documentation was accessed to identify the progression of clinical competency along with written feedback received by students from clinical assessors.

RESULTS

Results demonstrate the ways in which GEN students position themselves performatively in order to pre-empt or challenge negative stereotypes relating to their competence, compassion and commitment.

CONCLUSIONS

Students employ a number of strategies to navigate the challenges of learning within an environment in which they are viewed with suspicion and distrust.

The clinical viva: an assessment of clinical thinking

In order to enable Masters level pre-registration students to demonstrate sophisticated cognitive abilities, integration of knowledge, complex problem solving, critical opinion, lateral thinking and innovative action; an innovative assessment tool is required (Sadler, 2009). A clinical viva was devised to enable third year students in their final transitional placement prior to qualifying demonstrate both the art and science of nursing practice. The assessment combines some of the viva element of an Australian assessment model described by Levett-Jones et al. (2011), together with the think aloud approach suggested by Banning (2008); whereby the think aloud model acts as a catalyst for eliciting students' understandings and knowledge and the SOAP model is a mechanism for the assessment of students' understandings and knowledge. Rust (2002) calls for students to be afforded opportunities for regular formative feedback; therefore, the assessment includes a replica formative assessment, one week prior to the summative assessment. This formative test prevents assessment being seen as a snapshot of the student's development and encourages assessment for learning and is an approach which is suggested to discourage surface learning (Rust, 2002). A holistic rubric was developed in an attempt to capture the students' abilities against the six cognitive operators or heuristics suggested by Banning (2008). Open-ended questions were devised to be asked of the students as advocated by Levett-Jones et al. (2011), to uncover the student's cognitive abilities, integration of knowledge, complex problem solving, critical opinion, lateral thinking and innovative action. Roberts (2011) calls for new and innovative ways of assessing student learning which bridges the artificial divide between theory and practice and enables students to demonstrate both the art and science of nursing practice (p610). The clinical viva has the potential to be one such mechanism.

A systematic review of outcome and impact of master's in health and health care

BACKGROUND

The 'human resources for health' crisis has highlighted the need for more health (care) professionals and led to an increased interest in health professional education, including master's degree programmes. The number of these programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is increasing, but questions have been raised regarding their relevance, outcome and impact. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the outcomes and impact of health-related master's degree programmes.

METHODS

We searched the databases Scopus, Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC, Psychinfo and Cochrane (1999 - November 2011) and selected websites. All papers describing outcomes and impact of health-related Master programmes were included. Three reviewers, two for each article, extracted data independently. The articles were categorised by type of programme, country, defined outcomes and impact, study methods used and level of evidence, and classified according to outcomes: competencies used in practice, graduates' career progression and impact on graduates' workplaces and sector/society.

RESULTS

Of the 33 articles included in the review, most originated from the US and the UK, and only one from a low-income country. The programmes studied were in public health (8), nursing (8), physiotherapy (5), family practice (4) and other topics (8). Outcomes were defined in less than one third of the articles, and impact was not defined at all. Outcomes and impact were measured by self-reported alumni surveys and qualitative methods. Most articles reported that competencies learned during the programme were applied in the workplace and alumni reported career progression or specific job changes. Some articles reported difficulties in using newly gained competencies in the workplace. There was limited evidence of impact on the workplace. Only two articles reported impact on the sector. Most studies described learning approaches, but very few described a mechanism to ensure outcome and impact of the programme.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that graduates apply newly learned competencies in the field and that they progress in their career. There is a paucity of well-designed studies assessing the outcomes and impact of health-related master's degree programmes in low- and middle-income countries. Studies of such programmes should consider the context and define outcomes and impact.