Nursing students' experiences of a challenging course: A photo-elicitation study

Pivoting in the pandemic: a qualitative study of child and adolescent psychiatrists in the times of COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

We examined the personal and professional impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development, practice, and shifting values of child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAP), in order to inform how the field may move forward post-pandemic.

METHODS

We conducted individual semi-structured interviews of child and adolescent psychiatrists (n = 24) practicing in the United States. Participants were selected as a diverse purposive sample of active members of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP). We analyzed anonymized transcripts through iterative coding using thematic analysis aided by NVivo software.

RESULTS

We identified three main thematic domains within participants' response to the pandemic, which have engendered a reevaluation of and a recommitment to the aims of each clinician and the field of CAP more broadly. These domains, paired with representative questions, include: (1) Unsettling, or "who have we been?" (identifying discontents such as daily inefficiencies and intraprofessional loss of trust); (2) Adaptation, or "who are we now?" (exploring affordances and limitations of virtual work, and the evolution of personal and professional identity); and (3) Reimagination, or "who will we become?" (renewing a commitment to psychiatry as advocacy). Even as we identified a collective agreement toward the need for implementing change, just what needs to change, and how that change will be realized, remain contested.

CONCLUSION

These three thematic domains, augmented by a national confrontation with race and equity, have engendered a field-wide reckoning with known inequities. They have reinvigorated collective responses and calls to action. The divergent mindsets to change and leadership have provided an aperture for what values and practices the field might instill in its next generation of practitioners.

Does a novel teaching approach work? A Students' perspective

BACKGROUND

There is always a call for educational reform and further research to improve educational programs. The continuous development of new educational approaches is a work in progress. Educational strategies like team-based learning, flipped classroom, and lottery-based token economy, were used to develop a novel teaching approach.

AIM

This study had two major goals. The first goal was to introduce a novel teaching approach in professional healthcare academies. The second goal was to get an in-depth understanding, from the students' perspective, about the benefits and limitations of this new teaching approach.

METHOD

The study was conducted using a qualitative, phenomenological research design. Third and fourth-year nursing students completed reflective journals to describe their personal experience with the new teaching approach at the end of the semester. The students' responses were analyzed and coded using Kember's four-category coding schema for reflective writing, to extract themes using thematic analysis.

FINDINGS

Seventy-five students completed and returned their reflective journals. The analysis showed various challenges and facilitators/benefits of the students' experiences. The themes that emerged from the analysis were: lack of exposure vs. a sense of achievement; lack of teamwork skills vs. role fulfillment; working with new people vs. conflict resolution; variation vs. collaboration/creativity; time management vs. constructive competition; wasting resources vs. flexibility, and proactivity/active engagement. These themes summarized why the new teaching approach worked and what barriers students faced with the new assembly.

CONCLUSION

Results from the current study demonstrated the great potential of the new teaching approach. Recommendations for future research were also discussed.