How do nurses promote critical thinking in acute care? A scoping literature review

Relationships between professional identity, motivation, and innovative ability among nursing intern students: A cross-sectional study

Objective

To explore the relationships among motivation, professional identity, and innovative ability of nursing intern students.

Background

Professional identity and innovative ability are important for nursing students' core competitiveness and care quality. During the internship, nursing students integrate theoretical knowledge and practice, and have a rapid growth. Motivation is positively associated with professional identity and innovative ability. However, there are limited studies examining the professional identity, motivation, and innovative ability of nursing intern students.

Design

A descriptive cross-sectional online study.

Methods

Students in the nursing schools in southwest and central of China were included in this study and conducted from June to July 2022. A total of 474 nursing intern students were recruited from 16 nursing schools. Research data were collected with "Participants' Demographics Form", "the Professional Identity Questionnaire for Nursing Students", "the Revised Life Goals Questionnaire", and "the Revised Multidimensional Innovative Questionnaire". Independent-sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, correlation coefficients, and structural equation modeling were used in data analysis. This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.

Results

A significantly positive correlation was determined among the professional identity (67.55 ± 8.42), motivation (53.38 ± 5.54), and innovative ability (47.99 ± 5.46) of nursing students (r > 0.4, P < 0.001). Motivation had a mediating effect on professional identity and innovative ability (P = 0.003), accounting for 10.9% (0.075/0.689) of the total effect.

Conclusions

There was a positive correlation among professional identity, motivation, and innovative ability. Developing motivation and professional identity can enhance nursing intern students' ability to innovate.

Clinical supervision strategies, learning, and critical thinking of nursing students

OBJECTIVE

To identify the supervisory strategies that Nursing students consider facilitators of the development of critical thinking skills in clinical teaching.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study, within the interpretative paradigm, using the focus group methodology. Eight undergraduate nursing students participated in the study.

RESULTS

Participants recognized the indispensability of critical thinking for professional responsibility and quality of care and highlighted the importance of using supervisory strategies adapted to their needs, learning objectives, and the context of clinical practice.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

This study highlights the urgent need to establish, within the Nursing curricula, clinical supervision strategies that promote critical thinking and favor the development of skills for good clinical judgment, problem solving, and safe, effective, and ethical decision-making.

Capturing New Nurses' Experiences and Supporting Critical Thinking: Text Network Analysis of Critical Reflective Journals

This study analyzed the contents of critical reflective journals written by new nurses during their orientations using a text network. This study aimed to find ways to reduce turnover and improve clinical field adaptability among new nurses. The authors analyzed the content of reflective journals written by 143 new nurses from March 2020 to January 2021. Text network analysis was performed using the NetMiner 4.4.3 program. After data preprocessing, frequency of occurrence, degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, and eigenvector community were analyzed. In total, 453 words were extracted and refined, and words with high simple frequency and centrality were "incompetence," "preparation," "explanation," "injection," "time," "examination," and "first try." "Medication" had the highest frequency of occurrence, and "incompetence" was the most important keyword in the centrality analysis. In addition, component analysis and eigenvector community analysis revealed three sub-theme groups: (1) basic nursing skills required for new nurses, (2) insufficient competency, and (3) explanation of nursing work. Significantly, this study is the first to use the text network method to analyze the subjective experiences of the critical reflective journals of new nurses. In conclusion, changes are needed to improve the education system for new nurses and promote efficient sharing of nursing tasks.

Evaluation of a nurse practitioner clinical practicum module using a capability education framework: A case study design

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this research was to evaluate a nurse practitioner's clinical practicum module designed with a capability education framework. The objectives were to determine if the module prepared students adequately for their role and to determine if the Mini-CEX assessment tool was suitable for use with nurse practitioners.

BACKGROUND

Capability is a necessary part of expertise, where a capable person takes responsibility to develop their own education, knowledge and skills. The capability learning framework offers nurse practitioners flexible learning pathways between the student, the university and clinical practice. This capability learning framework focuses on the wider complexities of nurse practitioner practice as opposed to a point-in-time assessment.

DESIGN

A case study design was used.

METHODS

Mixed methods including, document review, focus group and field notes were used in the case study evaluation adhering to the standards for the reporting of organisational case studies.

RESULTS

A layered incremental approach to learning and assessments were applied. Students and assessors were satisfied with using the Mini-CEX assessment tool in the module. The Mini-CEX tool was familiar to clinical mentors, who compared students demonstrating competency in a similar manner to medicine. The feedback component of the tool provided deep and meaningful engagement for students. The module provided mentors with insight and understanding of the nurse practitioner role. Students identified the transitioning process from competent to capable practitioners. The module learning and assessments were mapped to regulatory nurse practitioner standards and requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

The module provided comprehensive preparation for students to develop their nurse practitioner role. The Mini-CEX assessment tool is a fitting assessment for nurse practitioner students, particularly when supplemented with a corresponding reflective exercise. The assessments and feedback provided the students with opportunities to focus on agreed learning outcomes in their specialist area of practice.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurse practitioners are required to practice autonomously and independently at a level of capability in clinical practice. The education preparation of nurse practitioner students must be directed appropriately.

Effects of Blended Simulation on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking Skills: A Quantitative Study

Introduction

Critical thinking is regarded as imperative to healthcare quality and patient outcomes; therefore, effective strategies in nursing education are required to promote students' critical thinking abilities, leading to their success in clinical work. Accordingly, simulation-based education has been suggested as a measure for achieving this goal.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore whether a nursing education course with blended simulation activities (hands-on simulations with high-fidelity manikins and a web-based interactive simulation program) could increase nursing students' critical thinking skills.

Method

A quasiexperimental, one-group pretest and post-test design was utilized. Data were collected through premeasurement and postmeasurement using a critical thinking questionnaire and were analyzed using paired sample t-tests, independent sample t-tests, and the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The effect size was calculated using Cohen's d formula.

Results

Sixty-one nursing students (57 women and four men, mean age 30 years) participated in the study. Findings of the paired sample t-test showed a significantly higher mean score for posteducation than pre-education, indicating a significant change in nurses' critical thinking capabilities (p < .001). The results for Cohen's d formula ( - 0.87) of the mean scores between pre-education and posteducation indicated a large effect size. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test also showed a statistically significant increase in the students' critical thinking abilities between pre-education and posteducation measures (p < .001). No statistically significant differences were found in the mean score according to age or sex.

Conclusion

This study concluded that blended simulation-based education can increase nursing students' critical thinking capabilities. As a result, this study builds on the use of simulation as a measure for developing and promoting critical thinking abilities during nursing education.

Expert Veterinarians Should Be Trained Expertly: Fostering the Development of Adaptive Expertise in Veterinary Students through Faculty Development for Veterinary Educators

The field of health professions education is rapidly evolving, and with it the field of veterinary education. This discussion piece amalgamates literature across health professions education to provide a picture of what a veterinary clinician-educator is, why there is a need for veterinary clinician-educators when developing learners with adaptive expertise, and how faculty development can support the growth of clinicians into clinician-educators. It is intended to outline the best practices for fostering the development of adaptive expertise in veterinary students through faculty development for veterinary educators.