κ-Opioid receptor participates of NSAIDs peripheral antinociception

Influence of Metamizole on Antitumour Activity of Risedronate Sodium in In Vitro Studies on Canine (D-17) and Human (U-2 OS) Osteosarcoma Cell Lines

The availability of metamizole varies greatly around the world. There are countries such as the USA, UK, or Australia where the use of metamizole is completely forbidden, and there are also countries where this drug is available only on prescription (e.g., Greece, Italy, Spain, etc.) and those in which it is sold OTC-over the counter (e.g., most Asian and South American countries). Metamizole, as a drug with a strong analgesic effect, is used as an alternative to other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alone or in combination with opioid drugs. Risedronate sodium is a third-generation bisphosphonate commonly used in orthopaedic and metabolic diseases of the musculoskeletal system, including hypercalcemia, postmenopausal osteoporosis, Paget's disease, etc. The aim of this study was to check whether there were any pharmacological interactions between metamizole and risedronate sodium in in vitro studies. Cell viability was assessed using the MTT method, the number of apoptotic cells was assessed using the labelling TUNEL method, and the cell cycle assessment was performed with a flow cytometer and propidium iodide. This was a pilot study, which is why only two cancer cell lines were tested: D-17 of canine osteosarcoma and U-2 OS of human osteosarcoma. Exposure of the canine osteosarcoma cell line to a combination of risedronate sodium (100 µg/mL) and metamizole (50, 5, and 0.5 µg/mL) resulted in the complete abolition of the cytoprotective activity of metamizole. In the human osteosarcoma cell line, the cytotoxic effect of risedronate sodium was entirely eliminated in the presence of 50 µg/mL of metamizole. The cytoprotective and anti-apoptotic effect of metamizole in combination with risedronate sodium in the tested human and canine osteosarcoma cell lines indicates an urgent need for further in vivo studies to confirm or disprove the potential dose-dependent undesirable effect of such a therapy.

Synergistic interaction and activation of the opioid receptor-NO-cGMP-K+ channel pathway on peripheral antinociception induced by the α-Bisabolol-diclofenac combination

Introduction: The local peripheral combination of analgesic drugs with herbal derivatives may have beneficial effects. Information on the action mechanism of these interactions between drugs is scarce. Therefore, the main of the present study was to determine the pharmacological interaction and action mechanism of the combination α-Bisabolol and diclofenac. Methods: Rats were injected in the dorsal surface of the right hind paw with 1% formalin. Rats received subcutaneous injections in the dorsal surface of paw of vehicles or increasing doses of α-Bisabolol, diclofenac or their combination before formalin injection into the paw. Antinociception of the α-Bisabolol + diclofenac combination was evaluated with and without the local treatment of naloxone, metformin, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 1H- (1,2,4)-oxadiazolo (4,2-a) quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), glibenclamide, glipizide, 4-aminopyridine, tetraethylammonium, apamin, or charybdotoxin. Results: α-Bisabolol, diclofenac or α-Bisabolol-diclofenac combinations produced significant antinociception in the rat (p < 0.05). The experimental effective dose (ED) value of 109.2 µg/paw was different significantly of the theoretical effective dose (ED) of 245.7 µg/paw (synergism). Blockers significantly reverted the antinociception produced by the synergistic combination of α-Bisabolol and diclofenac. Discussion: Data showed a synergism of the α-Bisabolol-diclofenac combination and the activation of the opioid receptor-Nitric Oxide-cyclic GMP-K⁺ channels pathway and a biguanide-dependent mechanism in order to produce the potentiation of its peripheral antinociception in the formalin test.

Pharmacokinetics of metamizole (dipyrone) as an add-on in calves undergoing umbilical surgery

This preliminary clinical investigation of the pharmacokinetic behavior of the main metamizole (dipyrone) metabolites 4-methylaminoantipyrine (4-MAA) and 4-aminoantipyrine (4-AA) in calves undergoing umbilical surgery is part of an already published main study. A single intravenous dose of metamizole was added to ketamine/xylazine/isoflurane anesthesia. Eight Simmental calves weighing 90 ± 10.8 kg and aged 47.6 ± 10.4 days received 40 mg/kg metamizole intravenously 10 minutes prior to general anesthesia. Blood samples were collected over 24 hours and analyzed for 4-MAA and 4-AA. Meloxicam was additionally given twice: 2.5 hours pre- and 20.5 hours postsurgically. The pharmacokinetic profile of 4-MAA was best fitted to a two-compartment model and was characterized by a fast distribution half-life and slow elimination half-life (t_½alpha = 5.29 minutes, t_½beta = 9.49 hours). The maximum concentration (C_max 101.63 μg/mL) was detected at the first measurement time point 15 minutes after administration. In contrast, 4-AA showed fast, high and biphasic plasma peak concentration behavior in five calves (2.54–2.66 μg/mL after 15–30 minutes, and 2.10–2.14 μg/mL after 2–3.5 hours) with a t_½beta of 8.87 hours, indicating a rapid distribution and subsequent redistribution from well-perfused organs. Alternatively, three calves exhibited a slower and lower monophasic plasma peak concentration (1.66 μg/mL after 6.5 hours) with a t_½beta of 6.23 hours, indicating slow accumulation in the intravascular compartment. The maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) of 4-AA were lower than those of 4-MAA. This metabolic behavior supports our already published data on clinical monitoring and plasma cortisol concentrations (PCCs). Compared to those of saline controls, lower PCCs correspond to the t_½alpha of 4-MAA. Data on T_max and t_½beta also match these clinical observations. However, further studies are required to assess the exact analgesic mechanism and potency of the metamizole metabolites in calves.

Topical Treatments and Their Molecular/Cellular Mechanisms in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain-Narrative Review

Neuropathic pain in humans results from an injury or disease of the somatosensory nervous system at the peripheral or central level. Despite the considerable progress in pain management methods made to date, peripheral neuropathic pain significantly impacts patients' quality of life, as pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods often fail or induce side effects. Topical treatments are gaining popularity in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain, due to excellent safety profiles and preferences. Moreover, topical treatments applied locally may target the underlying mechanisms of peripheral sensitization and pain. Recent studies showed that peripheral sensitization results from interactions between neuronal and non-neuronal cells, with numerous signaling molecules and molecular/cellular targets involved. This narrative review discusses the molecular/cellular mechanisms of drugs available in topical formulations utilized in clinical practice and their effectiveness in clinical studies in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. We searched PubMed for papers published from 1 January 1995 to 30 November 2020. The key search phrases for identifying potentially relevant articles were "topical AND pain", "topical AND neuropathic", "topical AND treatment", "topical AND mechanism", "peripheral neuropathic", and "mechanism". The result of our search was 23 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 9 open-label studies, 16 retrospective studies, 20 case (series) reports, 8 systematic reviews, 66 narrative reviews, and 140 experimental studies. The data from preclinical studies revealed that active compounds of topical treatments exert multiple mechanisms of action, directly or indirectly modulating ion channels, receptors, proteins, and enzymes expressed by neuronal and non-neuronal cells, and thus contributing to antinociception. However, which mechanisms and the extent to which the mechanisms contribute to pain relief observed in humans remain unclear. The evidence from RCTs and reviews supports 5% lidocaine patches, 8% capsaicin patches, and botulinum toxin A injections as effective treatments in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. In turn, single RCTs support evidence of doxepin, funapide, diclofenac, baclofen, clonidine, loperamide, and cannabidiol in neuropathic pain states. Topical administration of phenytoin, ambroxol, and prazosin is supported by observational clinical studies. For topical amitriptyline, menthol, and gabapentin, evidence comes from case reports and case series. For topical ketamine and baclofen, data supporting their effectiveness are provided by both single RCTs and case series. The discussed data from clinical studies and observations support the usefulness of topical treatments in neuropathic pain management. This review may help clinicians in making decisions regarding whether and which topical treatment may be a beneficial option, particularly in frail patients not tolerating systemic pharmacotherapy.

Antinociceptive Effects of Kappa-Opioid Receptor Agonists

Preclinical models that assess "pain" in rodents typically measure increases in behaviors produced by a "pain stimulus." A large literature exists showing that kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists can decrease these "pain-stimulated behaviors" following many different pain stimuli. Despite showing apparent antinociceptive properties in these preclinical models, KOR agonists failed as analgesics in clinical trials. Recent studies that assessed decreases in behavior due to a pain stimulus show that KOR agonists are not effective in restoring these "pain-depressed behaviors" to normal levels, which agrees with the lack of effectiveness for KOR agonists in clinical trials. One current explanation for the failure of previous KOR agonists in clinical trials is that those agonists activated beta-arrestin signaling and that KOR agonists with a greater bias for G protein signaling will be more successful. However, neither G protein-biased agonists nor beta-arrestin-biased agonists are very effective in assays of pain-depressed behavior, which suggests that novel biased agonists may still not be effective analgesics. This review provides a concise account of the effectiveness of KOR agonists in preclinical models of pain-stimulated and pain-depressed behaviors following the administration of different pain stimuli. Based on the previous results, it may be appropriate to include both behaviors when testing the analgesic potential of KOR agonists.

Inhibition of Fast Nerve Conduction Produced by Analgesics and Analgesic Adjuvants-Possible Involvement in Pain Alleviation

Nociceptive information is transmitted from the periphery to the cerebral cortex mainly by action potential (AP) conduction in nerve fibers and chemical transmission at synapses. Although this nociceptive transmission is largely inhibited at synapses by analgesics and their adjuvants, it is possible that the antinociceptive drugs inhibit nerve AP conduction, contributing to their antinociceptive effects. Many of the drugs are reported to inhibit the nerve conduction of AP and voltage-gated Na⁺ and K⁺ channels involved in its production. Compound action potential (CAP) is a useful measure to know whether drugs act on nerve AP conduction. Clinically-used analgesics and analgesic adjuvants (opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ₂-adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and local anesthetics) were found to inhibit fast-conducting CAPs recorded from the frog sciatic nerve by using the air-gap method. Similar actions were produced by antinociceptive plant-derived chemicals. Their inhibitory actions depended on the concentrations and chemical structures of the drugs. This review article will mention the inhibitory actions of the antinociceptive compounds on CAPs in frog and mammalian peripheral (particularly, sciatic) nerves and on voltage-gated Na⁺ and K⁺ channels involved in AP production. Nerve AP conduction inhibition produced by analgesics and analgesic adjuvants is suggested to contribute to at least a part of their antinociceptive effects.

Medial prefrontal cortex diclofenac-induced antinociception is mediated through GPR55, cannabinoid CB1, and mu-opioid receptors of this area and periaqueductal gray

Supraspinal mechanisms of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced antinociception are not well understood. In the present study, the possible antinociceptive mechanisms induced by intra-medial prefrontal cortex (intra-mPFC) microinjection of diclofenac were investigated after blockade of GPR55, cannabinoid CB1, and mu-opioid receptors in this area and ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG). For drug delivery, unilateral (left side) of mPFC and bilateral (right and left sides) of vlPAG were surgically cannulated. Formalin test was induced by subcutaneous injection of a diluted formalin solution into the right vibrissa pad. A typical biphasic (neurogenic and inflammatory phases) pain behavior was produced following formalin injection. Microinjection of diclofenac (2.5, 5, and 10 μg/0.25 μL) into the mPFC suppressed both phases of pain. Intra-mPFC microinjection of naloxonazine (a mu-opioid receptor antagonist, 1 μg/0.25 μL) and AM251 (a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, 1 μg/0.25 μL) increased both phases of pain intensity. In addition, intra-mPFC-microinjected diclofenac-induced antinociception was inhibited by prior intra-mPFC and intra-vlPAG administration of naloxonazine and AM251. On the other hand, intra-mPFC and intra-vlPAG microinjection of AM251 (0.25 μg/0.25 μL) decreased pain severity which was inhibited by prior administration of ML193. The above-mentioned drugs did not alter locomotor activity. In conclusion, diclofenac suppressed both the neurogenic and inflammatory phases of formalin-induced orofacial pain at the level of mPFC. GPR55, cannabinoid CB1, and mu-opioid receptors of the mPFC and vlPAG might be involved in the mPFC analgesic effects of diclofenac.

Possible involvement of the peripheral Mu-opioid system in antinociception induced by bergamot essential oil to allodynia after peripheral nerve injury

The essential oil of bergamot (BEO) is one of the most common essential oils and is most familiar to the general public. The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of intraplantar (i.pl.) BEO on neuropathic allodynia induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL) in mice and the opioid receptor subtypes involved in the antiallodynic effects of BEO. Our findings showed that a single dose of i.pl. administration of BEO significantly inhibited the PSNL-induced neuropathic pain using the von Frey test. The i.pl pretreatment with naloxone methiodide, a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor preferring antagonist, β-funaltrexamine hydrochloride (β-FNA), a selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist, and β-endorphin antiserum significantly reversed the antiallodynic effect of BEO in the von Frey test, but not by naltrindole, the nonselective δ-opioid receptor antagonist and nor-binaltorphimine, the selective κ-opioid receptor antagonist. Furthermore, in the western blotting analysis, i.pl. administration of BEO resulted in a significant blockage of spinal extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) activation induced by PSNL. Naloxone methiodide and β-FNA significantly reversed the blockage of spinal ERK activation induced by BEO. These results suggest that i.pl. injection of BEO-induced antiallodynic effect and blockage of spinal ERK activation may be triggered by activation of peripheral μ-opioid receptors.

Inhibition by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs of compound action potentials in frog sciatic nerve fibers

AIMS

Although antinociception produced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is partly attributed to nerve conduction inhibition, this has not been thoroughly examined yet. The aim of the present study was to reveal quantitatively how various types of NSAIDs affect compound action potentials (CAPs), a measure of nerve conduction.

MAIN METHODS

CAPs were recorded from the frog sciatic nerve by using the air-gap method.

KEY FINDINGS

Soaking the sciatic nerve with acetic acid-based NSAIDs (diclofenac and aceclofenac) reduced the peak amplitude of CAP in a concentration-dependent manner; their IC₅₀ values were 0.94 and 0.47 mM, respectively. Other acetic acid-based NSAIDs (indomethacin, acemetacin and etodolac) also inhibited CAPs [the extent of inhibition: some 40% (1 mM), 40% (0.5 mM) and 15% (1 mM), respectively], except for sulindac and felbinac at 1 mM that had no effects on CAP peak amplitudes. A similar inhibition was produced by fenamic acid-based NSAIDs [tolfenamic acid (IC₅₀ = 0.29 mM), meclofenamic acid (0.19 mM), flufenamic acid (0.22 mM) and mefenamic acid] which are similar in chemical structure to diclofenac and aceclofenac; their derivatives (2,6-dichlorodiphenylamine and N-phenylanthranilic acid) also inhibited. On the other hand, salicylic acid-based (aspirin), propionic acid-based (ketoprofen, naproxen, ibuprofen, loxoprofen and flurbiprofen) and enolic acid-based (meloxicam and piroxicam) NSAIDs had no effects on CAP peak amplitudes.

SIGNIFICANCE

At least a part of antinociception produced by NSAIDs used as a dermatological drug to alleviate pain may be attributed to their inhibitory effects on nerve conduction, which depend on the chemical structures of NSAIDs.

Endogenous Opiates and Behavior: 2016

This paper is the thirty-ninth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2016 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia, stress and social status, tolerance and dependence, learning and memory, eating and drinking, drug abuse and alcohol, sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology, mental illness and mood, seizures and neurologic disorders, electrical-related activity and neurophysiology, general activity and locomotion, gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions, cardiovascular responses, respiration and thermoregulation, and immunological responses.

Assessment of the antinociceptive and ulcerogenic activity of the tapentadol-diclofenac combination in rodents

Preclinical Research & Development The objective of the present study was to evaluate the tapentadol-diclofenac combination in three dose-ratios in the mouse acetic acid-induced visceral pain and their ulcerogenic activity on the stomachal mucous. Dose-response curves were generated for tapentadol, diclofenac, and their combination in the acetic acid-induced writhing test in mice. Moreover, the stomachs of animals were surgically removal and gastrointestinal ulcerogenic action of the combination was assessed. The isobolographic analysis, interaction index, and ANOVA were used to analyze the data. The isobolographic analysis and interaction index showed a similar antinociceptive activity for the three combinations of the analgesic mixture. Moreover, tapentadol and the proportions 1:1 or 3:1 of the analgesic combination caused a mild gastrointestinal damage. These data indicate that the systemic co-administration of tapentadol and diclofenac produced a synergistic interaction in the acetic acid-induced visceral pain test with an acceptable gastric damage profile in mice.

Metamizole (dipyrone) effects on sevoflurane requirements and postoperative hyperalgesia in rats

Unlike non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), metamizole has poor anti-inflammatory effects; and is suitable for models where analgesia, but not anti-inflammatory effects, is desirable. Like opioids, these drugs produce perioperative analgesia while reducing anaesthetic requirements, but it remains unclear whether they may develop tolerance or hyperalgesia, and thus decrease in analgesic efficacy. The aim was to determine whether tolerance or hyperalgesia to metamizole occurred in rats, and whether the sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was affected. In a randomized, prospective, controlled study, male Wistar rats ( n = 8 per group) were administered metamizole (300 mg/kg, day 4). Previously, the following treatments were provided: daily metamizole for four days (0-3), morphine (10 mg/kg; positive control, day 0 only) or saline (negative control). The main outcome measures were mechanical (MNT) and warm thermal (WNT) nociceptive quantitative sensory thresholds. The baseline sevoflurane MAC and the reduction produced by the treatments were also determined. The mean (SD) baseline MAC [2.4(0.2)%vol] was decreased by morphine and metamizole by 45(11)% and 33(7)% ( P = 0.000, both), respectively. Baseline MNT [35.4(4.5) g] and WNT [13.2(2.4) s] were decreased by morphine and metamizole: MNT reduction of 22(6)% ( P = 0.000) and 22(7)% ( P = 0.001), respectively and WNT reduction of 34(14)% ( P = 0.000) and 24(13)% ( P = 0.001). The baseline MAC on day 4 was neither modified by treatments nor the MAC reduction produced by metamizole (days 0 and 4; P > 0.05). In conclusion, repeated metamizole administration may produce hyperalgesia, although it may not modify its anaesthetic sparing effect. The clinical relevance of this effect in painful research models requiring prolonged analgesic therapy warrants further investigation.