A disynaptic pathway from the central amygdaloid nucleus to the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus via the parastrial nucleus in the rat

Dissecting a disynaptic central amygdala - parasubthalamic nucleus neural circuit that mediates cholecystokinin-induced eating suppression

Objective

Cholecystokinin (CCK) plays a critical role in regulating eating and metabolism. Previous studies have mapped a multi-synapse neural pathway from the vagus nerve to the central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA) that mediates the anorexigenic effect of CCK. However, the neural circuit downstream of the CEA is still unknown due to the complexity of the neurons in the CEA. Here we sought to determine this circuit using a novel approach.

Methods

It has been established that a specific population of CEA neurons, marked by protein kinase C-delta (PKC-δ), mediates the anorexigenic effect of CCK by inhibiting other CEA inhibitory neurons. Taking advantage of this circuit, we dissected the neural circuit using a unique approach based on the idea that neurons downstream of the CEA should be disinhibited by CEA^PKC-δ+ neurons while being activated by CCK. We also used optogenetic assisted electrophysiology circuit mapping and in vivo chemogenetic manipulation methods to determine the circuit structure and function.

Results

We found that neurons in the parasubthalamic nucleus (PSTh) are activated by the activation of CEA^PKC-δ+ neurons and by the peripheral administration of CCK. We demonstrated that CEA^PKC-δ+ neurons inhibit the PSTh-projecting CEA neurons; accordingly, the PSTh neurons can be disynaptically disinhibited or “activated” by CEA^PKC-δ+ neurons. Finally, we showed that chemogenetic silencing of the PSTh neurons effectively attenuates the eating suppression induced by CCK.

Conclusions

Our results identified a disynaptic CEA-PSTh neural circuit that mediates the anorexigenic effect of CCK and thus provide an important neural mechanism of how CCK suppresses eating.

•

A unique approach combining a genetically identified neuron population with an anorexigenic agent for circuits mapping.

•

Dissected a disynaptic central amygdala-parasubthalamic nucleus neural circuit for the function of cholecystokinin.

•

Identified a previously understudied brain region that regulates the anorexigenic effect of cholecystokinin.

Activation of VTA/CeA/mPFC cannabinoid CB1 receptors induced conditioned drug effects via interacting with hippocampal CAMKII-CREB-BDNF signaling pathway in rats

The present study intended to investigate whether the activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the central amygdala (CeA) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) could induce conditioned place preference or aversion (CPP or CPA) in adult male Wistar rats. The involvement of hippocampal signaling pathway of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII)/cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)/brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was also examined following a 3-day schedule of conditioning with the injection of arachidonylcyclopropylamide (ACPA; a selective cannabinoid CB1 receptors agonist) into the targeted sites. The results showed that intra-VTA injection of the higher dose of ACPA (5 ng/rat) caused a significant CPP associating with the increased hippocampal level of the phosphorylated (p)-CAMKII/CAMKII. Intra-mPFC injection of ACPA at 3 ng/rat caused a significant CPA associating with the decreased p-CAMKII and p-CREB levels and the increased BDNF level in the hippocampus. Moreover, intra-CeA injection of the ACPA (5 ng/rat) induced a significant CPP which was associated with the increased hippocampal levels of p-CAMKII/total (t) CAMKII, p-CREB/tCREB, and BDNF. Exposing the animals to the CPP apparatus after receiving intra-cerebral vehicle injection increased the hippocampal CAMKII/CREB/BDNF signaling pathway, confirming that CPP is an associative learning task. In all experiments, the conditioning treatment with the different doses of ACPA did not affect locomotor activity in the testing phase. Taken together, it can be concluded that cannabinoid CB1 receptors of the VTA, the CeA, and the mPFC are involved in rewarding/aversion effects through the changes in the hippocampal signaling pathways.

Substance P: A neuropeptide involved in the psychopathology of anxiety disorders

Substance P (SP) is the most widely distributed neuropeptide in central nervous system (CNS) where it participates in numerous physiological and pathophysiological processes including stress and anxiety related behaviors. In line with this notion, brain areas that are thought to be involved in anxiety regulation contains SP and its specific NK1 receptors. SP concentration in different brain regions alters with the exposure of stressful stimulus and affected NK1 receptor binding is observed. SP is released in response to a stressor, which produces anxiogenic effects via activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, resulting in the liberation of cortisol. Moreover, SP is also involved in the activation of the sympathetic nervous system via stimulation of locus coeruleus (LC). This sympathetic surge initiates cortisol discharge by activation of HPA axis, representing the indirect anxiogenic effect of SP. Besides the aforementioned regions, SP also has an impact on other brain regions known to be involved in stress and anxiety mechanisms, including amygdala, lateral septum (LS), periaqueductal gray (PAG), ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (VMH), and bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Thus, SP acts as an important neuromodulator in various brain regions in stress and anxiety response. Consistent with the above statement, SP makes a robust link in the psychopathology of anxiety disorders. As SP concentration is found elevated in stressed conditions, several studies have reported that the pharmacological antagonism or genetic depletion of NK-1 receptors results in the anxiolytic response making them a suitable therapeutic target for the treatment of stress and anxiety related disorders.

Uncovering the neural circuitry involved in the stress-attenuation effects of chewing

Previous animal studies have indicated that coupling restraint stress load with activation of the masticatory organs (chewing) causes a reduction in the systemic and central nervous system stress response. However, the brain mechanism underlying this effect is unknown. Therefore, in this review, we summarize the literature regarding brain regions involved in the attenuating effects of chewing and the systemic stress response attenuation effects induced by those brain regions. In addition, we also focusing on the amygdala, as the emotional control center, and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, as one of the outputs of the systemic response. In particular, we will report on one of the chewing-related stress attenuation mechanisms within the brain brought about by the activation of the inhibition pathway accompanying the activation of the amygdala's GABAergic function.

Chronic stress and brain plasticity: Mechanisms underlying adaptive and maladaptive changes and implications for stress-related CNS disorders

Stress responses entail neuroendocrine, autonomic, and behavioral changes to promote effective coping with real or perceived threats to one's safety. While these responses are critical for the survival of the individual, adverse effects of repeated exposure to stress are widely known to have deleterious effects on health. Thus, a considerable effort in the search for treatments to stress-related CNS disorders necessitates unraveling the brain mechanisms responsible for adaptation under acute conditions and their perturbations following chronic stress exposure. This paper is based upon a symposium from the 2014 International Behavioral Neuroscience Meeting, summarizing some recent advances in understanding the effects of stress on adaptive and maladaptive responses subserved by limbic forebrain networks. An important theme highlighted in this review is that the same networks mediating neuroendocrine, autonomic, and behavioral processes during adaptive coping also comprise targets of the effects of repeated stress exposure in the development of maladaptive states. Where possible, reference is made to the similarity of neurobiological substrates and effects observed following repeated exposure to stress in laboratory animals and the clinical features of stress-related disorders in humans.

The central amygdala as an integrative hub for anxiety and alcohol use disorders

The central amygdala (CeA) plays a central role in physiologic and behavioral responses to fearful stimuli, stressful stimuli, and drug-related stimuli. The CeA receives dense inputs from cortical regions, is the major output region of the amygdala, is primarily GABAergic (inhibitory), and expresses high levels of prostress and antistress peptides. The CeA is also a constituent region of a conceptual macrostructure called the extended amygdala that is recruited during the transition to alcohol dependence. We discuss neurotransmission in the CeA as a potential integrative hub between anxiety disorders and alcohol use disorder, which are commonly co-occurring in humans. Imaging studies in humans and multidisciplinary work in animals collectively suggest that CeA structure and function are altered in individuals with anxiety disorders and alcohol use disorder, the end result of which may be disinhibition of downstream "effector" regions that regulate anxiety-related and alcohol-related behaviors.

Neurochemical properties of the synapses between the parabrachial nucleus-derived CGRP-positive axonal terminals and the GABAergic neurons in the lateral capsular division of central nucleus of amygdala

The lateral capsular division of central nucleus of amygdala (CeC) contains neurons using γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) as the predominant neurotransmitter and expresses abundant calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-positive terminals. However, the relationship between them has not been revealed yet. Using GAD67-green fluorescent protein (GFP) knock-in mouse, we investigated the neurochemical features of synapses between CGRP-positive terminals and GABAergic neurons within CeC and the potential involvement of CGRP1 receptor by combining fluorescent in situ hybridization for CGRP1 receptor mRNA with immunofluorescent histochemistry for GFP and CGRP. The ultrastructures of these synapses were investigated with pre-embedding electron microscopy for GFP and CGRP. We found that some GABAergic neurons in the CeC received parabrachial nucleus (PBN) derived CGRP innervations and some of these GABAergic neurons can be activated by subcutaneous injection of formalin. Moreover, more than 90 % GABAergic neurons innervated by CGRP-positive terminal also express CGRP1 receptor mRNA. The CGRP-positive fibers made symmetric synapses onto the GABAergic somata, and asymmetric synapses onto the GABA-LI dendritic shafts and spines. This study provides direct ultrastructural evidences for the synaptic contacts between CGRP-positive terminals and GABAergic neurons within the CeC, which may underlie the pain-related neural pathway from PBN to CeC and be involved in the chronic pain modulation.

Social and environmental contexts modulate sleep deprivation-induced c-Fos activation in rats

People often sleep deprive themselves voluntarily for social and lifestyle reasons. Animals also appear to stay awake longer as a result of their natural curiosity to explore novel environments and interact socially with conspecifics. Although multiple arousal systems in the brain are known to act jointly to promote and maintain wakefulness, it remains unclear whether these systems are similarly engaged during voluntary vs. forced wakefulness. Using c-Fos immunohistochemistry, we compared neuronal responses in rats deprived of sleep for 2 h by gentle sensory stimulation, exploration under social isolation, or exploration with social interaction, and rats under undisturbed control conditions. In many arousal, limbic, and autonomic nuclei examined (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex and locus coeruleus), the two sleep deprivation procedures involving exploration were similarly effective, and both were more effective than sleep deprivation with sensory stimulation, in increasing the number of c-Fos immunoreactive neurons. However, some nuclei (e.g., paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus and select amygdala nuclei) were more responsive to exploration with social interaction, while others (e.g., histaminergic tuberomammillary nucleus) responded more strongly to exploration in social isolation. In the rostral basal forebrain, cholinergic and GABAergic neurons responded preferentially to exploration with social interaction, whereas resident neurons in general responded most strongly to exploration without social interaction. These results indicate that voluntary exploration with/without social interaction is more effective than forced sleep deprivation with gentle sensory stimulation for inducing c-Fos in arousal and limbic/autonomic brain regions, and suggest that these nuclei participate in different aspects of arousal during sustained voluntary wakefulness.

Neuroanatomical distribution of the orphan GPR50 receptor in adult sheep and rodent brains

GPR50, formerly known as melatonin-related receptor, is one of three subtypes of the melatonin receptor subfamily, together with the MT(1) and MT(2) receptors. By contrast to these two high-affinity receptor subtypes and despite its high identity with the melatonin receptor family, GPR50 does not bind melatonin or any other known ligand. Specific and reliable immunological tools are therefore needed to be able to elucidate the physiological functions of this orphan receptor that are still largely unknown. We have generated and validated a new specific GPR50 antibody against the ovine GPR50 and used it to analyse the neuroanatomical distribution of the GPR50 in sheep, rat and mouse whole brain. We demonstrated that GPR50-positive cells are widely distributed in various regions, including the hypothalamus and the pars tuberalis of the pituitary, in all the three species studied. GPR50 expressing cells are abundant in the dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus, the periventricular nucleus and the median eminence. In rodents, immunohistochemical studies revealed a broader distribution pattern for the GPR50 protein. GPR50 immunoreactivity is found in the medial preoptic area (MPA), the lateral septum, the lateral hypothalamic area, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, the vascular organ of the laminae terminalis and several regions of the amygdala, including the medial nuclei of amygdala. Additionally, in the rat brain, GPR50 protein was localised in the CA1 pyramidal cell layer of the dorsal hippocampus. In mice, moderate to high numbers of GPR50-positive cells were also found in the subfornical organ. Taken together, these results provide an enlarged distribution of GPR50 protein, give further insight into the organisation of the melatoninergic system, and may lay the framework for future studies on the role of the GPR50 in the brain.

Toward a limbic cortical inhibitory network: implications for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses following chronic stress

A network of interconnected cell groups in the limbic forebrain regulates hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation during emotionally stressful experiences, and disruption of these systems is broadly implicated in the onset of psychiatric illnesses. A significant challenge has been to unravel the circuitry and mechanisms providing for regulation of HPA output, as these limbic forebrain regions do not provide any direct innervation of HPA effector cell groups in the paraventricular hypothalamus (PVH). Recent evidence will be highlighted that endorses a discrete region within the bed nuclei of the stria terminalis serving as a neural hub for integrating and relaying HPA-inhibitory influences to the PVH during emotional stress, whereas the prevailing view has involved a more complex organization of mulitple cell groups arranged in parallel between the forebrain and PVH. A hypothesis will be advanced that accounts for the capacity of this network to constrain the magnitude and/or duration of HPA axis output in response to emotionally stressful experiences, and for how chronic stress-induced synaptic reorganization in key cell groups may lead to an attrition of these influences, resulting in HPA axis hyperactivity.

Amygdala regulation of fear and emotionality in fragile X syndrome

Fear is a universal response to a threat to one's body or social status. Disruption in the detection and response of the brain's fear system is commonly observed in a variety of neurodevelopmental disorders, including fragile X syndrome (FXS), a brain disorder characterized by variable cognitive impairment and behavioral disturbances such as social avoidance and anxiety. The amygdala is highly involved in mediating fear processing, and increasing evidence supports the idea that inhibitory circuits play a key role in regulating the flow of information associated with fear conditioning in the amygdala. Here, we review the known and potential importance of amygdala fear circuits in FXS, and how developmental studies are critical to understand the formation and function of neuronal circuits that modulate amygdala-based behaviors.

Distinct patterns of neuronal inputs and outputs of the juxtaparaventricular and suprafornical regions of the lateral hypothalamic area in the male rat

We have analyzed at high resolution the neuroanatomical connections of the juxtaparaventricular region of the lateral hypothalamic area (LHAjp); as a control and in comparison to this, we also performed a preliminary analysis of a nearby LHA region that is dorsal to the fornix, namely the LHA suprafornical region (LHAs). The connections of these LHA regions were revealed with a coinjection tract-tracing technique involving a retrograde (cholera toxin B subunit) and anterograde (Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin) tracer. The LHAjp and LHAs together connect with almost every major division of the cerebrum and cerebrospinal trunk, but their connection profiles are markedly different and distinct. In simple terms, the connections of the LHAjp indicate a possible primary role in the modulation of defensive behavior; for the LHAs, a role in the modulation of ingestive behavior is suggested. However, the relation of the LHAjp and LHAs to potential modulation of these behaviors, as indicated by their neuroanatomical connections, appears to be highly integrative as it includes each of the major functional divisions of the nervous system that together determine behavior, i.e., cognitive, state, sensory, and motor. Furthermore, although a primary role is indicated for each region with respect to a particular mode of behavior, intermode modulation of behavior is also indicated. In summary, the extrinsic connections of the LHAjp and LHAs (so far as we have described them) suggest that these regions have a profoundly integrative role in which they may participate in the orchestrated modulation of elaborate behavioral repertoires.

Central amygdaloid axon terminals are in contact with retrorubral field neurons that project to the parvicellular reticular formation of the medulla oblongata in the rat

The retrorubral field (RRF) contains numerous dopaminergic neurons and projects to the parvicellular reticular formation (RFp) of the medullary and pontomedullary brainstem, where many premotor neurons project to the orofacial motor nuclei. To know how the amygdala affects the RRF-RFp pathway in the rat, we first examined the synaptic organization between the central amygdaloid nucleus (CeA) fibers and the RFp-projecting RRF neurons by using combined anterograde and retrograde tracing techniques. After ipsilateral injections of biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) into the CeA and Fluoro-gold (FG) into the RFp, the prominent overlapping distribution of BDA-labeled axon terminals and FG-labeled neurons was found in the lateral part of the RRF ipsilateral to the injection sites, where the BDA-labeled axon terminals made symmetrical synapses with somata and dendrites of the FG-labeled neurons. Using a combination of retrograde tracing and immunohistochemistry for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), we secondly demonstrated that the RFp-projecting RRF neurons were immunonegative for TH. Using a combination of anterograde tracing and immunohistochemistry for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), we finally revealed that the CeA axon terminals in the RRF were immunoreactive for GAD. The present results suggest that GABAergic CeA neurons may exert inhibitory influences on non-dopaminergic RRF neurons that project to the RFp in the control of orofacial movements closely related to emotional behavior.