Les marqueurs biologiques protéiques du liquide céphalorachidien : caractéristiques et implications cliniques dans les démences

Top-Down Proteomics Applied to Human Cerebrospinal Fluid

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the fluid of choice to study pathologies and disorders of the central nervous system (CNS). Its composition, especially its proteins and peptides, holds the promise that it may reflect the pathological state of an individual. Traditionally, proteins and peptides in CSF have been analyzed using bottom-up proteomics technologies in the search of high proteome coverage. However, the limited protein sequence coverage of this technology means that information regarding post-translational modifications (PTMs) and alternative splice variants is lost. As an alternative technology, top-down proteomics offers low to medium proteome coverage, but high protein coverage enabling almost a full characterization of the proteins' primary structure. This allows us to precisely identify distinct molecular forms of proteins (proteoforms) as well as naturally occurring bioactive peptide fragments, which could be of critical biological relevance and would otherwise remain undetected with a classical proteomics approach.Here, we describe various strategies including sample preparation protocols, off-line intact protein prefractionation, and LC-MS/MS methods together with data analysis pipelines to analyze cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by top-down proteomics. However, there is not a unique or standardized method and the selection of the top-down strategy will depend on the exact goal of the study. Here, we describe various top-down proteomics methods that enable rapid protein characterization and may be an excellent companion analytical workflow in the search for new protein biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases.

Sample Pooling and Inflammation Linked to the False Selection of Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Top-Down Proteomics: A Pilot Study

Proteomic technologies have been recently adapted to the new field of clinical proteomics. The origin of errors and biases has been well-identified in the pre-analytical steps, leading to the measurement of clinical analytes. One possible source of inadequacy in clinical proteomics is linked to sample pooling. This practice is usually related to low sample availability, variability, experiment time/cost. In this study, we first asked whether sample pooling in top–down proteomics is suitable to obtain a relevant biological average. Our second objective was to identify inflammatory biomarkers of outlier samples in our population of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease patients. Our results demonstrated that, in a proteomics study, sample pooling as well as the inflammation status was an important source of errors: missed detection of biomarkers and false identification of others. Pooled samples were not equivalent to the average of biological values. In addition, this procedure reduced the statistical value of the identified biomarkers due to a stabilization of their standard deviation and rendered outlier samples difficult to detect. We identified serum amyloid A as a candidate biomarker of outlier samples. The presence of this protein, which could be explained by inflammatory processes, induced major modifications in the sample profiles.