1
|
Sharma R, Thirugnanasambandam N. Theta-Gamma Decoupling - A neurophysiological marker of impaired reward processing in Parkinson's disease. Brain Res 2024; 1850:149406. [PMID: 39708901 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Revised: 12/14/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024]
Abstract
Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) exhibit altered reward processing, reflected by a decreased amplitude of an event-related potential (ERP) marker called reward positivity (RewP). Most studies have used RewP to investigate reward behavior due to the high temporal resolution of EEG and its high sensitivity. However, traditional single-electrode ERP analyses often overlook the intricate dynamics of non-phase-locked oscillatory activity and the complex interactions within these neural oscillatory patterns. Studying oscillatory activity is crucial as it provides mechanistic insights into the functional, spatial, and temporal aspects of neuronal processing. To address this gap, we employed a data-driven approach to identify EEG-based markers associated with PD reward processing deficits. Using an openly available 64-channel EEG dataset of 28 age- and sex-matched PD and control participants during a reinforcement learning task, we conducted a comprehensive secondary analysis. First, we employed a cluster-based permutation method to extract ERP markers, finding a consistent decrease in reward positivity in PD, regardless of medication status. Additionally, through region of interest (ROI) analysis on time-frequency data, we identified specific oscillatory patterns during reward processing. PD patients exhibited attenuated theta power and increased gamma power compared to healthy controls (HC). Notably, within the PD group, those off medication showed anterior localization of high gamma power, while those on medication displayed higher posterior gamma power. Building upon these findings, we explored phase-amplitude coupling between theta phase and gamma amplitude measured by the modulation index. We observed a trend of decreased theta-gamma coupling in PD patients, with statistically significant differences between on and off medication conditions. These results highlight the potential role of theta-gamma coupling as a neuromodulatory target for improving goal-oriented behavior in PD. Our correlation analyses suggest that high gamma power is linked to longer disease duration, while reduced reward positivity and low theta-gamma coupling may serve as markers of the dopaminergic impact on reward processing. Thus, our study unveils the intricate time-frequency dynamics underlying reward processing deficits in PD, emphasizing the utility of a data-driven approach to elucidate neural mechanisms and to identify potential therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashi Sharma
- Human Motor Neurophysiology and Neuromodulation Lab, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
| | - Nivethida Thirugnanasambandam
- Human Motor Neurophysiology and Neuromodulation Lab, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Voon V, Manssuer L, Zhao YJ, Ding Q, Zhao Y, Wang L, Wang T, Huang P, Pan Y, Sun B, Li D. Modeling impulsivity and risk aversion in the subthalamic nucleus with deep brain stimulation. NATURE. MENTAL HEALTH 2024; 2:1084-1095. [PMID: 39263364 PMCID: PMC11383798 DOI: 10.1038/s44220-024-00289-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
Risk evaluation is ubiquitous in decisions. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is effective for Parkinson's disease and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and can be associated with impulsivity and hypomania. Subthalamic stimulation has seemingly contrasting effects on impulsivity enhancing conflict-induced impulsivity but decreasing risk taking. Here, using a card gambling task paired with intracranial recordings (n = 25) and within-subject case control acute stimulation (n = 15) of the right subthalamic nucleus, we dissociated objective risk and uncertainty and subjective physiological markers of risk. Acute stimulation decreased risk taking (P = 0.010, Cohen's d = 0.72) and increased subthalamic theta activity (P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.72). Critically, stimulation negatively shifted the relationship between subthalamic physiology and a measure of evidence accumulation similar to observations with stimulation-induced conflict processing. This highlights the phenotypic and physiological heterogeneity of impulsivity, yet linking mechanisms underlying stimulation-induced conflict and risk. Finally, stimulation-induced risk seeking implicates the ventral subthalamic nucleus and dissociating anatomical and functional connectivity with the mesial prefrontal cortex. Our findings have implications for conceptualizations of impulsivity, and clinical relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Voon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luis Manssuer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yi-Jie Zhao
- Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiong Ding
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ying Zhao
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Linbin Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Peng Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yixin Pan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bomin Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dianyou Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cowan RL, Davis T, Kundu B, Rahimpour S, Rolston JD, Smith EH. More widespread and rigid neuronal representation of reward expectation underlies impulsive choices. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.04.11.588637. [PMID: 38645037 PMCID: PMC11030340 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.11.588637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Impulsive choices prioritize smaller, more immediate rewards over larger, delayed, or potentially uncertain rewards. Impulsive choices are a critical aspect of substance use disorders and maladaptive decision-making across the lifespan. Here, we sought to understand the neuronal underpinnings of expected reward and risk estimation on a trial-by-trial basis during impulsive choices. To do so, we acquired electrical recordings from the human brain while participants carried out a risky decision-making task designed to measure choice impulsivity. Behaviorally, we found a reward-accuracy tradeoff, whereby more impulsive choosers were more accurate at the task, opting for a more immediate reward while compromising overall task performance. We then examined how neuronal populations across frontal, temporal, and limbic brain regions parametrically encoded reinforcement learning model variables, namely reward and risk expectation and surprise, across trials. We found more widespread representations of reward value expectation and prediction error in more impulsive choosers, whereas less impulsive choosers preferentially represented risk expectation. A regional analysis of reward and risk encoding highlighted the anterior cingulate cortex for value expectation, the anterior insula for risk expectation and surprise, and distinct regional encoding between impulsivity groups. Beyond describing trial-by-trial population neuronal representations of reward and risk variables, these results suggest impaired inhibitory control and model-free learning underpinnings of impulsive choice. These findings shed light on neural processes underlying reinforced learning and decision-making in uncertain environments and how these processes may function in psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon L Cowan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Tyler Davis
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Bornali Kundu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, USA
| | - Shervin Rahimpour
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - John D Rolston
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Elliot H Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wong JK, Mayberg HS, Wang DD, Richardson RM, Halpern CH, Krinke L, Arlotti M, Rossi L, Priori A, Marceglia S, Gilron R, Cavanagh JF, Judy JW, Miocinovic S, Devergnas AD, Sillitoe RV, Cernera S, Oehrn CR, Gunduz A, Goodman WK, Petersen EA, Bronte-Stewart H, Raike RS, Malekmohammadi M, Greene D, Heiden P, Tan H, Volkmann J, Voon V, Li L, Sah P, Coyne T, Silburn PA, Kubu CS, Wexler A, Chandler J, Provenza NR, Heilbronner SR, Luciano MS, Rozell CJ, Fox MD, de Hemptinne C, Henderson JM, Sheth SA, Okun MS. Proceedings of the 10th annual deep brain stimulation think tank: Advances in cutting edge technologies, artificial intelligence, neuromodulation, neuroethics, interventional psychiatry, and women in neuromodulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 16:1084782. [PMID: 36819295 PMCID: PMC9933515 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1084782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The deep brain stimulation (DBS) Think Tank X was held on August 17-19, 2022 in Orlando FL. The session organizers and moderators were all women with the theme women in neuromodulation. Dr. Helen Mayberg from Mt. Sinai, NY was the keynote speaker. She discussed milestones and her experiences in developing depression DBS. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging DBS technologies as well as the logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The consensus among the DBS Think Tank X speakers was that DBS has continued to expand in scope however several indications have reached the "trough of disillusionment." DBS for depression was considered as "re-emerging" and approaching a slope of enlightenment. DBS for depression will soon re-enter clinical trials. The group estimated that globally more than 244,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. This year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: neuromodulation in Europe, Asia, and Australia; cutting-edge technologies, closed loop DBS, DBS tele-health, neuroethics, lesion therapy, interventional psychiatry, and adaptive DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Doris D. Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - R. Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Casey H. Halpern
- Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Lothar Krinke
- Newronika, Goose Creek, SC, United States
- Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James F. Cavanagh
- Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Jack W. Judy
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Svjetlana Miocinovic
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Annaelle D. Devergnas
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Roy V. Sillitoe
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Carina R. Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wayne K. Goodman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Erika A. Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Helen Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - David Greene
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Petra Heiden
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Huiling Tan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Valerie Voon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Pankaj Sah
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Terry Coyne
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter A. Silburn
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Cynthia S. Kubu
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Anna Wexler
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jennifer Chandler
- Centre for Health Law, Policy, and Ethics, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole R. Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sarah R. Heilbronner
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Marta San Luciano
- Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Christopher J. Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Michael D. Fox
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Psychiatry, Radiology, and Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jaimie M. Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|