In vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel negative allosteric modulator of neuronal nAChRs

Analgesic potential of transdermal nicotine patch in surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

We aimed (1) to systematically review the efficacy of transdermal nicotine patches (NP) for postoperative analgesia, (2) to establish the current quality of evidence and assist clinical decision-making on the subject, and (3) to identify methodological limitations and the need for more well-designed studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched six electronic databases, protocol records, and other sources without date or language restriction until March 2022. To develop the search strategy, we formulated a clinical question by using the PICOD method. Eligibility criteria included randomised placebo-controlled trials on the analgesic potential of NP for surgical procedures. This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 statement, and we registered the protocol in PROSPERO (#CRD42020205956).

RESULTS

We included 10 randomised placebo-controlled trials (535 patients). The NP administered before induction of anaesthesia and at beginning of surgery reduced the pain immediately after surgery (-0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.73 to -0.02), and 6 h (-0.34; 95% CI: -0.68 to -0.01), 12 h (-0.43; 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.15) and 24 h (-0.35; 95%CI: -0.59 to -0.10) after surgery, compared with the placebo patch (PP) group. Sensitivity testing suggests that opioid use could underestimate NP analgesia. Late demand for the first analgesic and consumption of rescue analgesics tended to be lower in the NP group.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings suggest, with low certainty of evidence, the analgesic potential of NP for surgical procedures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Perioperative use of NP significantly improved postoperative pain, even when opioids were administered or prescribed. Nevertheless, the clinical relevance should be interpreted with caution, owing to the effect sizes of the summary measures and methodological issues. The analgesic potential of NP as an adjuvant therapy to regulate pain and acute inflammation may offer certain clinical advantages, thus warranting further investigation.

Recent Advances in the Discovery of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Allosteric Modulators

Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs), negative allosteric modulators (NAMs), silent agonists, allosteric activating PAMs and neutral or silent allosteric modulators are compounds capable of modulating the nicotinic receptor by interacting at allosteric modulatory sites distinct from the orthosteric sites. This survey is focused on the compounds that have been shown or have been designed to interact with nicotinic receptors as allosteric modulators of different subtypes, mainly α7 and α4β2. Minimal chemical changes can cause a different pharmacological profile, which can then lead to the design of selective modulators. Experimental evidence supports the use of allosteric modulators as therapeutic tools for neurological and non-neurological conditions.

Computational analysis of non-competitive antagonist arylguanidine-α7 nAChR complexes

meta-Chlorophenylguanidine (1) is a non-competitive α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonist. Here we examined the hydrogen bond donor role of the anilinic N₁-H on the inhibitory effect of 1 by preparing its N₁-CH₃ counterpart 2. Analog 2 was found to be at least as potent as 1 as a non-competitive α7 nAChR antagonist in a patch-clamp assay. To establish a structural basis for the mode of interaction of guanidines 1 and 2, we generated 100 homology models of the hα7 nAChR. This was followed by Connolly surface (SYBYL-X2.1) and blind docking (AutoDock 4.1) studies to identify eight possible binding pockets, two of which were supported by empirical data and employed in our docking studies. The optimized model-ligand complexes were analyzed using a Hydropathic INTeractions (HINT) analysis in order to compare and contrast different binding pockets and modes. We identified a potential allosteric binding site and distinct rotameric binding modes for 1 and 2 at α7 nAChRs. These differences in the binding orientations minimized the importance of an anilinic NH function for the antagonist activity at nACh receptors.

Effect fingerprinting of new psychoactive substances (NPS): What can we learn from in vitro data?

The use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) is increasing and currently >600 NPS have been reported. However, limited information on neuropharmacological and toxicological effects of NPS is available, hampering risk characterization. We reviewed the literature on the in vitro neuronal modes of action to obtain effect fingerprints of different classes of illicit drugs and NPS. The most frequently reported NPS were selected for review: cathinones (MDPV, α-PVP, mephedrone, 4-MEC, pentedrone, methylone), cannabinoids (JWH-018), (hallucinogenic) phenethylamines (4-fluoroamphetamine, benzofurans (5-APB, 6-APB), 2C-B, NBOMes (25B-NBOMe, 25C-NBOMe, 25I-NBOMe)), arylcyclohexylamines (methoxetamine) and piperazine derivatives (mCPP, TFMPP, BZP). Our effect fingerprints highlight the main modes of action for the different NPS studied, including inhibition and/or reversal of monoamine reuptake transporters (cathinones and non-hallucinogenic phenethylamines), activation of 5-HT₂receptors (hallucinogenic phenethylamines and piperazines), activation of cannabinoid receptors (cannabinoids) and inhibition of NDMA receptors (arylcyclohexylamines). Importantly, we identified additional targets by relating reported effect concentrations to the estimated human brain concentrations during recreational use. These additional targets include dopamine receptors, α- and β-adrenergic receptors, GABA_Areceptors and acetylcholine receptors, which may all contribute to the observed clinical symptoms following exposure. Additional data is needed as the number of NPS continues to increase. Also, the effect fingerprints we have obtained are still incomplete and suffer from a large variation in the reported effects and effect sizes. Dedicated in vitro screening batteries will aid in complementing specific effect fingerprints of NPS. These fingerprints can be implemented in the risk assessments of NPS that are necessary for eventual control measures to reduce Public Health risks.