Ultra-low-dose naloxone suppresses opioid tolerance, dependence and associated changes in mu opioid receptor-G protein coupling and Gbetagamma signaling

Effective Doses of Low-Dose Naltrexone for Chronic Pain - An Observational Study

Purpose

Despite the availability of a wide variety of analgesics, many patients with chronic pain often experience suboptimal pain relief in part related to the absence of any medication to address the nociplastic component of common pain syndromes. Low-dose naltrexone has been used for the treatment of chronic pain, typically at 4.5 mg per day, even though it is also noted that effective doses of naltrexone for chronic pain presentations range from 0.1 to 4.5 mg per day. We performed an observational analysis to determine the range of effective naltrexone daily dosing in 41 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Methods

Charts of 385 patients, 115 males, 270 females, ages 18-92, were reviewed. Two hundred and sixty patients with chronic diffuse, symmetrical pain were prescribed a titrating dose of naltrexone to determine a maximally effective dose established by self-report of 1) reduction of diffuse/generalized and/or severity level of pain and/or 2) positive effects on mood, energy, and mental clarity. Brief Pain Inventory and PROMIS scales were given pre- and post-determining a maximally effective naltrexone dose.

Results

Forty-one patients met all criteria for inclusion, successfully attained a maximally effective dose, and completed a pre- and post-outcome questionnaire. Hormesis was demonstrated during the determination of the maximally effective dosing, which varied over a wide range, with statistically significant improvement in BPI.

Conclusion

The maximally effective dose of low-dose naltrexone for the treatment of chronic pain is idiosyncratic, suggesting the need for 1) dosage titration to establish a maximally effective dose and 2) the possibility of re-introduction of low-dose naltrexone to patients who had failed initial trials on a fixed dose of naltrexone.

How do opioids control pain circuits in the brainstem during opioid-induced disorders and in chronic pain? Implications for the treatment of chronic pain

ABSTRACT

Brainstem areas involved in descending pain modulation are crucial for the analgesic actions of opioids. However, the role of opioids in these areas during tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), and in chronic pain settings remains underappreciated. We conducted a revision of the recent studies performed in the main brainstem areas devoted to descending pain modulation with a special focus on the medullary dorsal reticular nucleus (DRt), as a distinctive pain facilitatory area and a key player in the diffuse noxious inhibitory control paradigm. We show that maladaptive processes within the signaling of the µ-opioid receptor (MOR), which entail desensitization and a switch to excitatory signaling, occur in the brainstem, contributing to tolerance and OIH. In the context of chronic pain, the alterations found are complex and depend on the area and model of chronic pain. For example, the downregulation of MOR and δ-opioid receptor (DOR) in some areas, including the DRt, during neuropathic pain likely contributes to the inefficacy of opioids. However, the upregulation of MOR and DOR, at the rostral ventromedial medulla, in inflammatory pain models, suggests therapeutic avenues to explore. Mechanistically, the rationale for the diversity and complexity of alterations in the brainstem is likely provided by the alternative splicing of opioid receptors and the heteromerization of MOR. In conclusion, this review emphasizes how important it is to consider the effects of opioids at these circuits when using opioids for the treatment of chronic pain and for the development of safer and effective opioids.

Naloxone could limit morphine hypersensitivity: Considering the molecular mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Naloxone has been used as an opioid antagonist to prevent multiple adverse side effects of opioid-like tolerance and hyperalgesia. This study has investigated naloxone combined with morphine to limit pain hypersensitivity. In addition, the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and K⁺ Cl^- cotransporter2 (KCC2) were also studied.

METHODS

Forty-eight adult male Wistar rats (180-220 g) were divided into eight groups, with six rats in each group. Rats were divided into two tolerance and hyperalgesia groups; the sham group, the morphine group, the treatment group (naloxone along with morphine), and the sham group (naloxone along with saline) for eight consecutive days. Tail-flick test was performed on days 1, 5, and 8, and the plantar test on days 1 and 10. On days 8 and 10, the lumbar segments of the spinal cord were collected, and BDNF and KCC2 expression were analyzed using western blotting and immunohistochemistry, respectively.

RESULTS

Results showed that tolerance and hyperalgesia developed following eight days of repeated morphine injection. BDNF expression significantly increased, but KCC2 was downregulated. Co-administration of naloxone and morphine decreased tolerance and hyperalgesia by decreasing BDNF and increasing KCC2 expression, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that BDNF and KCC2 may be candidate molecules for decreased morphine tolerance and hyperalgesia.

The efficacy of nalmefene on anesthetic recovery of patients: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

So far, the recovery quality after general anesthesia is still unsatisfied. Nalmefene is a drug to treat opioid overdose and reverse opioid actions. We aim to investigate the efficacy of nalmefene on optimizing the recovery quality of patients after general anesthesia.

METHODS

It is a prospective, placebo-controlled, two-arm parallel groups, multicentre, double-blind, randomized (PPPMDR) clinical trial. The participants (n = 520) will be randomly assigned into two groups. Each patient will receive either: a single dose of nalmefene 0.25 µg/kg in the intervention group, or the same volume of 0.9% NaCl solution in the control group at the end of the surgery. The primary outcome will be the time interval between the end of anaesthesia and recovery endpoints achieved (Aldrete recovery score ≥ 9) in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The other variables are the time interval from the end of operation to extubation; Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score at extubation; the time at Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) orientation score ≥ 5; visual analog scale (VAS) score and adverse effects including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pruritus in PACU and 24 h postoperatively.

ANALYSIS

This trial aims to study whether small dose of nalmefene can shorten the time from the end of surgery to Aldrete score ≥ 9 and improve opioid-induced side effects.This trial focuses on providing the reliable clinical evidence for satisfactory quality of recovery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This clinical trial has been approved and supported by the ethics committee of the Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine (KY2020-150); Shanghai Tongren Hospital (2021-030-01);The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (2021-032); and The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University(2021-KY-0495-003). Analysis of the study results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04713358, Registered on September 23, 2021.

The role of the type 7 adenylyl cyclase isoform in alcohol use disorder and depression

The translation of extracellular signals to intracellular responses involves a number of signal transduction molecules. A major component of this signal transducing function is adenylyl cyclase, which produces the intracellular "second messenger," cyclic AMP. What was initially considered as a single enzyme for cyclic AMP generation is now known to be a family of nine membrane-bound enzymes, and one cytosolic enzyme. Each member of the adenylyl cyclase family is distinguished by factors that modulate its catalytic activity, by the cell, tissue, and organ distribution of the family members, and by the physiological/behavioral functions that are subserved by particular family members. This review focuses on the Type 7 adenylyl cyclase (AC7) in terms of its catalytic characteristics and its relationship to alcohol use disorder (AUD, alcoholism), and major depressive disorder (MDD). AC7 may be part of the inherited system predisposing an individual to AUD and/or MDD in a sex-specific manner, or this enzyme may change in its expression or activity in response to the progression of disease or in response to treatment. The areas of brain expressing AC7 are related to responses to stress and evidence is available that CRF1 receptors are coupled to AC7 in the amygdala and pituitary. Interestingly, AC7 is the major form of the cyclase contained in bone marrow-derived cells of the immune system and platelets, and in microglia. AC7 is thus, poised to play an integral role in both peripheral and brain immune function thought to be etiologically involved in both AUD and MDD. Both platelet and lymphocyte adenylyl cyclase activity have been proposed as markers for AUD and MDD, as well as prognostic markers of positive response to medication for MDD. We finish with consideration of paths to medication development that may selectively modulate AC7 activity as treatments for MDD and AUD.

Endogenous opioid systems alterations in pain and opioid use disorder

Decades of research advances have established a central role for endogenous opioid systems in regulating reward processing, mood, motivation, learning and memory, gastrointestinal function, and pain relief. Endogenous opioid systems are present ubiquitously throughout the central and peripheral nervous system. They are composed of four families, namely the μ (MOPR), κ (KOPR), δ (DOPR), and nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOPR) opioid receptors systems. These receptors signal through the action of their endogenous opioid peptides β-endorphins, dynorphins, enkephalins, and nociceptins, respectfully, to maintain homeostasis under normal physiological states. Due to their prominent role in pain regulation, exogenous opioids-primarily targeting the MOPR, have been historically used in medicine as analgesics, but their ability to produce euphoric effects also present high risks for abuse. The ability of pain and opioid use to perturb endogenous opioid system function, particularly within the central nervous system, may increase the likelihood of developing opioid use disorder (OUD). Today, the opioid crisis represents a major social, economic, and public health concern. In this review, we summarize the current state of the literature on the function, expression, pharmacology, and regulation of endogenous opioid systems in pain. Additionally, we discuss the adaptations in the endogenous opioid systems upon use of exogenous opioids which contribute to the development of OUD. Finally, we describe the intricate relationship between pain, endogenous opioid systems, and the proclivity for opioid misuse, as well as potential advances in generating safer and more efficient pain therapies.

Evaluating oliceridine as a treatment option for moderate to severe acute post-operative pain in adults

INTRODUCTION

Despite the advances in regional anesthesia and non-opioid systemic analgesia, opioids remain the primary rescue analgesic for moderate to severe pain. However, the risks and side effects of opioid medications are well documented. Oliceridine is a novel opioid receptor agonist which is thought to have less risk of adverse events, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and respiratory depression.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors discuss the limitations of the current opioid and non-opioid analgesic options. They also review the pharmacokinetics of oliceridine, its analgesic efficacy, and risk of adverse events; and its added clinical value in managing moderate to severe pain.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the advances in regional anesthesia and multimodal systemic analgesia, opioid free analgesia is only feasible in selected procedures and patients. Oliceridine is effective in the management of moderate to severe pain and appears to be associated with lower risk of nausea and vomiting. The risk of sedation and respiratory depression associated with oliceridine will require further study. The availability of an opioid agonist with a better side effect profile could potentially change the current paradigm of opioid avoidance in postoperative pain management.

Low-Dose Naltrexone Co-Treatment in the Prevention of Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) is characterized by a heightened sensitivity to pain that occurs in patients following opioid use. Prescription of opioids is currently the standard form of pain management for both neuropathic and nociceptive pain, due to the relief that patients typically report following their use. Opioids, which aim to provide analgesic effects, can paradoxically cause increasing degrees of pain among the users. The increased nociception can be either due to the underlying pain for which the opioid was initially prescribed, or other unrelated pain. As a result, those who are initially prescribed opioids for chronic pain relief may instead be left with no overall relief, and experience additional algesia. While OIH can be treated through the reduction of opioid use, antagonistic treatment can also be utilized. In an attempt to reduce OIH in patients, low doses of the opioid antagonist naltrexone can be given concurrently. This review will analyze the current role and effectiveness of the use of naltrexone in managing OIH in opioid users as described in clinical and non-clinical studies. Additionally, it seeks to characterize the underlying mechanisms that enable opioid antagonist naltrexone to reduce OIH while still allowing opioids to act as an analgesic. The authors find that OIH is a prevalent condition, and in order to effectively combat it, clinicians and patients can benefit from an extended study on how naltrexone can be utilized as a treatment alongside opioids prescribed for pain management.

Opioid Use Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite reported adverse effects of opioids in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the burden of opioid use in this population appears to be high. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prior studies to determine the prevalence of opioid use among patients with IBD as well as risk factors and outcomes associated with opioid use in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through November of 2019. Primary outcomes included the prevalence of opioid use and demographic and clinical variables associated with opioid use in patients with IBD. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We used random-effect meta-analysis to estimate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Of 780 citations identified, 31 were included in our study. The prevalence of opioid use was 21% (95% CI, 13%-30%) in the outpatient setting. Likewise, 62% (95% CI, 25%-92%) of patients received opioids while hospitalized for IBD. Opioid use was associated with female sex (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.40), depression (1.99; 95% CI 1.80-2.19), substance abuse (4.67; 95% CI 2.87-7.60), prior gastrointestinal surgery (2.33; 95% CI 1.66-3.26), biologic use (1.36; 95% CI 1.06-1.74), and steroid use (1.41; 95% CI 1.04-1.91). Based on the systematic review, opioid use also appeared to be associated with increased IBD activity, healthcare use, infection, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that 21% of outpatients with IBD (and 62% of hospitalized patients) are opioid users; use is associated with more severe IBD and increased healthcare use. Further studies are required to determine whether opioids are the cause or an effect of these associations. Nonetheless, urgent interventions are needed to reduce opioid use, improve disease-related outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Addressing opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hypersensitivity: Recent developments and future therapeutic strategies

Opioids are a commonly prescribed and efficacious medication for the treatment of chronic pain but major side effects such as addiction, respiratory depression, analgesic tolerance, and paradoxical pain hypersensitivity make them inadequate and unsafe for patients requiring long-term pain management. This review summarizes recent advances in our understanding of the outcomes of chronic opioid administration to lay the foundation for the development of novel pharmacological strategies that attenuate opioid tolerance and hypersensitivity; the two main physiological mechanisms underlying the inadequacies of current therapeutic strategies. We also explore mechanistic similarities between the development of neuropathic pain states, opioid tolerance, and hypersensitivity which may explain opioids' lack of efficacy in certain patients. The findings challenge the current direction of analgesic research in developing non-opioid alternatives and we suggest that improving opioids, rather than replacing them, will be a fruitful avenue for future research.

Central blockade of orexin type 1 receptors reduces naloxone induced activation of locus coeruleus neurons in morphine dependent rats

Orexin neuropeptides are implicated in the expression of morphine dependence. Locus coeruleus (LC) nucleus is an important brain area involving in the development of withdrawal signs of morphine and contains high expression of orexin type 1 receptors (OX1Rs). Despite extensive considerations, effects of immediate inhibition of OX1Rs by a single dose administration of SB-334867 prior to the naloxone-induced activation of LC neurons remains unknown. Therefore, we examined the direct effects of OX1Rs acute blockade on the neuronal activity of the morphine-dependent rats which underwent naloxone administration. Adult male rats underwent subcutaneous administration of 10 mg/kg morphine (two times/day) for a ten-day period. On the last day of experiment, intra-cerebroventricular administration of 10 μg/μl antagonist of OX1Rs, SB-334867, was performed just before intra-peritoneal injection of 2 mg/kg naloxone. Thereafter, in vivo extracellular single unit recording was employed to evaluate the electrical activity of LC neuronal cells. The outcomes demonstrated that morphine tolerance developed following ten-day of injection. Then, naloxone administration causes hyperactivity of LC neuronal cells, whereas a single dose administration of SB-334867 prior to naloxone prevented the enhanced activity of neurons upon morphine withdrawal. Our findings indicate that increased response of LC neuronal cells to applied naloxone could be prevented by the acute inhibition of the OX1Rs just before the naloxone treatment.

Shift of µ-opioid Receptor Signaling in the Dorsal Reticular Nucleus Is Implicated in Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia in Male Rats

BACKGROUND

Increased descending pain facilitation accounts for opioid-induced hyperalgesia, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Given the role of µ-opioid receptors in opioid-induced hyperalgesia in animals, the authors hypothesized that the dorsal reticular nucleus, a medullary pain facilitatory area, is involved in opioid-induced hyperalgesia through altered µ-opioid receptor signaling.

METHODS

The authors used male Wistar rats (n = 5 to 8 per group), chronically infused with morphine, to evaluate in the dorsal reticular nucleus the expressions of the µ-opioid receptor and phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding, a downstream marker of excitatory µ-opioid receptor signaling. The authors used pharmacologic and gene-mediated approaches. Nociceptive behaviors were evaluated by the von Frey and hot-plates tests.

RESULTS

Lidocaine fully reversed mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity induced by chronic morphine. Morphine-infusion increased µ-opioid receptor, without concomitant messenger RNA changes, and phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding levels at the dorsal reticular nucleus. µ-opioid receptor knockdown in morphine-infused animals attenuated the decrease of mechanical thresholds and heat-evoked withdrawal latencies compared with the control vector (von Frey [mean ± SD]: -17 ± 8% vs. -40 ± 9.0%; P < 0.001; hot-plate: -10 ± 5% vs. -32 ± 10%; P = 0.001). µ-opioid receptor knockdown in control animals induced the opposite (von Frey: -31 ± 8% vs. -17 ± 8%; P = 0.053; hotplate: -24 ± 6% vs. -3 ± 10%; P = 0.001). The µ-opioid receptor agonist (D-ALA2,N-ME-PHE4,GLY5-OL)-enkephalin acetate (DAMGO) decreased mechanical thresholds and did not affect heat-evoked withdrawal latencies in morphine-infused animals. In control animals, DAMGO increased both mechanical thresholds and heat-evoked withdrawal latencies. Ultra-low-dose naloxone, which prevents the excitatory signaling of the µ-opioid receptor, administered alone, attenuated mechanical and thermal hypersensitivities, and coadministered with DAMGO, restored DAMGO analgesic effects and decreased phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic morphine shifted µ-opioid receptor signaling from inhibitory to excitatory at the dorsal reticular nucleus, likely enhancing descending facilitation during opioid-induced hyperalgesia in the rat.

Disappearance of the inhibitory effect of neuropeptide Y within the dorsolateral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in rats with chronic pain

We recently showed that the mesolimbic dopaminergic system was tonically suppressed during chronic pain by enhanced corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) signaling within the dorsolateral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (dlBNST), and that inhibition of intra-dlBNST CRF signaling restored the mesolimbic dopaminergic system function. Specifically, bilateral intra-dlBNST injections of the CRF type 1 receptor antagonist NBI27914 increased intra-nucleus accumbens dopamine release and induced reward-related behaviors in rats with chronic pain. Here, we used a conditioned place preference (CPP) test to explore whether intra-dlBNST injections of neuropeptide Y (NPY) restored the mesolimbic reward system function in chronic pain rats, because we previously showed that NPY had an effect opposite to that of CRF in dlBNST neurons. Specifically, CRF depolarized type II dlBNST neurons whereas NPY hyperpolarized them. However, unexpectedly, intra-dlBNST NPY injections had no effect on CPP test outcomes. Then, we compared the effects of NPY on the membrane potentials of type II dlBNST neurons of sham-operated control rats and those of chronic pain animals. Whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology revealed that NPY hyperpolarized type II dlBNST neurons in the sham-operated group. By contrast, in the chronic pain group, NPY did not hyperpolarize, but rather depolarized, type II dlBNST neurons. These results indicate that NPY no longer hyperpolarizes type II dlBNST neurons in rats with chronic pain, therefore it does not reverse the excitatory effects of CRF. This may be why intra-dlBNST injections of NPY into chronic pain rats did not exhibit a rewarding effect in the CPP test, whereas intra-dlBNST injections of NBI27914 did. This is the first study to demonstrate a chronic pain-induced neuroplastic change in NPY signaling in the dlBNST. Such a change may be involved in the dysfunction of the mesolimbic reward system under the chronic pain condition.

Mu and delta opioid receptors play opposite nociceptive and behavioural roles on nerve-injured mice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Mu and delta opioid receptors(MOP, DOP) contribution to the manifestations of pathological pain is not understood. We used genetic approaches to investigate the opioid mechanisms modulating neuropathic pain and its comorbid manifestations.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We generated conditional knockout mice with MOP or DOP deletion in sensoryNav1.8-positive neurons (Nav1.8), in GABAergic forebrain neurons (DLX5/6) orconstitutively (CMV). Mutant mice and wild-type littermates were subjected topartial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL) or sham surgery and their nociception wascompared. Anxiety-, depressivelike behaviour and cognitive performance were also measured. Opioid receptor mRNA expression, microgliosis and astrocytosis were assessed in the dorsalroot ganglia (DRG) and/or the spinal cord (SC).

KEY RESULTS

Constitutive CMV-MOP knockouts after PSNL displayed reduced mechanical allodynia and enhanced heat hyperalgesia. This phenotype was accompanied by increased DOP expression in DRG and SC, and reduced microgliosis and astrocytosis in deep dorsal horn laminae. Conditional MOP knockouts and control mice developed similar hypersensitivity after PSNL, except for anenhanced heat hyperalgesia by DLX5/6-MOP male mice. Neuropathic pain-induced anxiety was aggravated in CMV-MOP and DLX5/6-MOP knockouts. Nerve-injured CMV-DOP mice showed increased mechanical allodynia, whereas Nav1.8-DOP and DLX5/8-DOP mice had partial nociceptive enhancement. CMV-DOP and DLX5/6-DOP mutants showed increased depressive-like behaviour after PSNL.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

MOP activity after nerve injury increased anxiety-like responses involving forebrain GABAergic neurons and enhanced mechanical pain sensitivity along with repression of DOP expression and spinal cord gliosis. In contrast, DOP shows a protective function limiting nociceptive and affective manifestations of neuropathic pain.

A Differential Hypofunctionality of Gαi Proteins Occurs in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Correlates with the Risk of Disease Progression

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most prevalent spine deformity and the molecular mechanisms underlying its pathophysiology remain poorly understood. We have previously found a differential impairment of melatonin receptor signaling in AIS osteoblasts allowing the classification of patients into three biological endophenotypes or functional groups (FG1, FG2 and FG3). Here, we provide evidence that the defect characterizing each endophenotype lies at the level of Gαi proteins leading to a systemic and generalized differential impairment of Gi-coupled receptor signaling. The three Gαi isoforms exhibited a selective serine phosphorylation patterns for each AIS endophenotype resulting in a differential reduction in Gαi protein activity as determined by cellular dielectric spectroscopy and small interfering RNA methods. We found that one endophenotype (FG2) with phosphorylated Gαi₁ and Gαi₂ was consistently associated with a significantly high risk of spinal deformity progression when compared to the other two endophenotypes (FG1 and FG3). We further demonstrated that each endophenotype is conserved among affected family members. This study expands our understanding of the mechanism underlying the Gi-coupled receptor signaling dysfunction occurring in AIS and provides the first evidence for its hereditary nature. Collectively, our findings offers a new perspective on Gαi hypofunctionality in a human disease by revealing specific serine phosphorylation signatures of Gαi isoforms that may facilitate the identification of AIS patients at risk of spinal deformity progression.

Dissociation between morphine-induced spinal gliosis and analgesic tolerance by ultra-low-dose α2-adrenergic and cannabinoid CB1-receptor antagonists

Long-term use of opioid analgesics is limited by tolerance development and undesirable adverse effects. Paradoxically, spinal administration of ultra-low-dose (ULD) G-protein-coupled receptor antagonists attenuates analgesic tolerance. Here, we determined whether systemic ULD α2-adrenergic receptor (AR) antagonists attenuate the development of morphine tolerance, whether these effects extend to the cannabinoid (CB1) receptor system, and if behavioral effects are reflected in changes in opioid-induced spinal gliosis. Male rats were treated daily with morphine (5 mg/kg) alone or in combination with ULD α2-AR (atipamezole or efaroxan; 17 ng/kg) or CB1 (rimonabant; 5 ng/kg) antagonists; control groups received ULD injections only. Thermal tail flick latencies were assessed across 7 days, before and 30 min after the injection. On day 8, spinal cords were isolated, and changes in spinal gliosis were assessed through fluorescent immunohistochemistry. Both ULD α2-AR antagonists attenuated morphine tolerance, whereas the ULD CB1 antagonist did not. In contrast, both ULD atipamezole and ULD rimonabant attenuated morphine-induced microglial reactivity and astrogliosis in deep and superficial spinal dorsal horn. So, although paradoxical effects of ULD antagonists are common to several G-protein-coupled receptor systems, these may not involve similar mechanisms. Spinal glia alone may not be the main mechanism through which tolerance is modulated.

Biased signaling of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs): Molecular determinants of GPCR/transducer selectivity and therapeutic potential

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) convey signals across membranes via interaction with G proteins. Originally, an individual GPCR was thought to signal through one G protein family, comprising cognate G proteins that mediate canonical receptor signaling. However, several deviations from canonical signaling pathways for GPCRs have been described. It is now clear that GPCRs can engage with multiple G proteins and the line between cognate and non-cognate signaling is increasingly blurred. Furthermore, GPCRs couple to non-G protein transducers, including β-arrestins or other scaffold proteins, to initiate additional signaling cascades. Receptor/transducer selectivity is dictated by agonist-induced receptor conformations as well as by collateral factors. In particular, ligands stabilize distinct receptor conformations to preferentially activate certain pathways, designated 'biased signaling'. In this regard, receptor sequence alignment and mutagenesis have helped to identify key receptor domains for receptor/transducer specificity. Furthermore, molecular structures of GPCRs bound to different ligands or transducers have provided detailed insights into mechanisms of coupling selectivity. However, receptor dimerization, compartmentalization, and trafficking, receptor-transducer-effector stoichiometry, and ligand residence and exposure times can each affect GPCR coupling. Extrinsic factors including cell type or assay conditions can also influence receptor signaling. Understanding these factors may lead to the development of improved biased ligands with the potential to enhance therapeutic benefit, while minimizing adverse effects. In this review, evidence for ligand-specific GPCR signaling toward different transducers or pathways is elaborated. Furthermore, molecular determinants of biased signaling toward these pathways and relevant examples of the potential clinical benefits and pitfalls of biased ligands are discussed.

Nitric oxide modulates μ-opioid receptor function in vitro

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a type of peripheral neuropathic pain that develops as a consequence of prolonged hyperglycaemia-induced injury to the long nerves. Apart from pain, PDN is also characterized by morphine hyposensitivity. Intriguingly, in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats exhibiting marked morphine hyposensitivity, dietary administration of the nitric oxide (NO) precursor, L-arginine at 1 g/d, progressively rescued morphine efficacy and potency over an 8-week treatment period. In earlier work, single bolus doses of the furoxan nitric oxide (NO) donor, PRG150 (3-methylfuroxan-4-carbaldehyde), evoked dose-dependent pain relief in STZ-diabetic rats but the efficacious doses were 3-4 orders of magnitude higher in advanced diabetes than that required in early STZ diabetes. Together, these findings suggested a role for NO in the modulation of μ-opioid (MOP) receptor signalling. Therefore, the present study was designed to assess a role for NO released from PRG150, in modulating MOP receptor function in vitro. Here, we show an absolute requirement for the MOP receptor, but not the δ-opioid (DOP) or the κ-opioid (KOP) receptor, to transduce the cellular effects of PRG150 on forskolin-stimulated cAMP responses in vitro. PRG150 did not interact with the classical naloxone-sensitive binding site of the MOP receptor, and its effects on cAMP responses in HEK-MOP cells were also naloxone-insensitive. Nevertheless, the inhibitory effects of PRG150 on forskolin-stimulated cAMP responses in HEK-MOP cells were dependent upon pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G_i/o proteins as well as membrane lipid rafts and src kinase. Together, our findings implicate a role for NO in modulating MOP receptor function in vivo.

μ-Opioid receptors in primary sensory neurons are essential for opioid analgesic effect on acute and inflammatory pain and opioid-induced hyperalgesia

KEY POINTS

μ-Opioid receptors (MORs) are expressed peripherally and centrally, but the loci of MORs responsible for clinically relevant opioid analgesia are uncertain. Crossing Oprm1^flox/flox and Advillin^Cre/+ mice completely ablates MORs in dorsal root ganglion neurons and reduces the MOR expression level in the spinal cord. Presynaptic MORs expressed at primary afferent central terminals are essential for synaptic inhibition and potentiation of sensory input by opioids. MOR ablation in primary sensory neurons diminishes analgesic effects produced by systemic and intrathecal opioid agonists and abolishes chronic opioid treatment-induced hyperalgesia. These findings demonstrate a critical role of MORs expressed in primary sensory neurons in opioid analgesia and suggest new strategies to increase the efficacy and reduce adverse effects of opioids.

ABSTRACT

The pain and analgesic systems are complex, and the actions of systemically administered opioids may be mediated by simultaneous activation of μ-opioid receptors (MORs, encoded by the Oprm1 gene) at multiple, interacting sites. The loci of MORs and circuits responsible for systemic opioid-induced analgesia and hyperalgesia remain unclear. Previous studies using mice in which MORs are removed from Nav1.8- or TRPV1-expressing neurons provided only an incomplete and erroneous view about the role of peripheral MORs in opioid actions in vivo. In the present study, we determined the specific role of MORs expressed in primary sensory neurons in the analgesic and hyperalgesic effects produced by systemic opioid administration. We generated Oprm1 conditional knockout (Oprm1-cKO) mice in which MOR expression is completely deleted from dorsal root ganglion neurons and substantially reduced in the spinal cord, which was confirmed by immunoblotting and immunocytochemical labelling. Both opioid-induced inhibition and potentiation of primary sensory input were abrogated in Oprm1-cKO mice. Remarkably, systemically administered morphine potently inhibited acute thermal and mechanical nociception and persistent inflammatory pain in control mice but had little effect in Oprm1-cKO mice. The analgesic effect of intrathecally administered morphine was also profoundly reduced in Oprm1-cKO mice. Additionally, chronic morphine treatment-induced hyperalgesia was absent in Oprm1-cKO mice. Our findings directly challenge the notion that clinically relevant opioid analgesia is mediated mostly by centrally expressed MORs. MORs in primary sensory neurons, particularly those expressed presynaptically at the first sensory synapse in the spinal cord, are crucial for both opioid analgesia and opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

Why mu-opioid agonists have less analgesic efficacy in neuropathic pain?

Injury to peripheral nerves often leads to abnormal pain states (hyperalgesia, allodynia and spontaneous pain), which can remain long after the injury heals. Although opioid agonists remain the gold standard for the treatment of moderate to severe pain, they show reduced efficacy against neuropathic pain. In addition to analgesia, opioid use is also associated with hyperalgesia and analgesia tolerance, whose underlying mechanisms share some commonalities with nerve injury-induced hypersensitivity. Here, we reviewed up-to-day research exploring the contribution of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) on the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain and on analgesic opioid actions under these conditions. We focused on the specific contributions of MOR populations at peripheral, spinal and supraspinal level. Moreover, evidences of neuroplastic changes that may underlie the low efficacy of MOR agonists under neuropathic pain conditions are reviewed and discussed. Sensitization processes leading to pain hypersensitivity, molecular changes in signalling pathways triggered by MOR and glial activation are some of these mechanisms elicited by both nerve injury and opioid exposure. Nerve injury-induced pain hypersensitivity might be masking the initial analgesic effects of opioid agonists, and alternatively, sustained opioid treatment to individuals already suffering from neuropathic pain could aggravate their pathophysiological state. Finally, some combined therapies that can increase opioid analgesic effectiveness in neuropathic pain treatment are highlighted. SIGNIFICANCE: This review provides evidence of the low benefit of opioid monotherapy in neuropathic pain and analyses the reasons of this reduced effectiveness. Opioid agonists along with drugs targeted to block the sensitization processes induced by MOR stimulation might result in a better management of neuropathic pain.

Altered Signaling in the Descending Pain-modulatory System after Short-Term Infusion of the μ-Opioid Agonist Remifentanil

μ-Opioid receptor agonists are widely used within the contemporary treatment of pain, but abrupt opioid suspension, even after short-term infusion, can paradoxically increase the sensitivity to noxious stimuli, a phenomenon that has been, for example, reported after application of the fast-acting μ-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil. To investigate the mechanisms underlying the effects of discontinuation of remifentanil application on pain processing in the human CNS, we analyzed neuronal responses to thermal stimuli before and after a short-term infusion of remifentanil (30 min 0.1 μg/kg body weight/min) compared with control in the brain, brainstem, and spinal cord in drug-naive male volunteers using fMRI. Subsequent to remifentanil suspension, we observed reduced heat pain thresholds and increased neuronal responses in pain-encoding as well as in key regions of the descending pain-modulatory system, such as the periaqueductal gray matter, the nucleus cuneiformis, and the rostral ventromedial medulla. Moreover, the spinal pain-related multivoxel activity pattern showed an opioid-specific change after drug suspension. Importantly, remifentanil suspension increased the functional coupling between the nucleus cuneiformis and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex, and the coupling strength between the rostral anterior cingulate cortex and the nucleus cuneiformis correlated negatively with the individual pain threshold after opioid suspension. These findings demonstrate that, already subsequent to a short-term infusion of the μ-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil, signaling in the descending pain-modulatory system is fundamentally altered and that these changes are directly related to the behavioral sensitivity to pain.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Opioids are widely used in modern medicine, but, in addition to their known side effects, it is increasingly recognized that opioids can also increase sensitivity to pain subsequent to their use. Using the fast-acting μ-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil and fMRI in healthy male volunteers, this study demonstrates how signaling changes occur along the entire descending pain-modulatory pathway after opioid discontinuation and how these alterations are closely linked to increased behavioral pain sensitivity. Particularly by revealing modified responses in pain-modulatory brainstem regions that have been previously demonstrated to be causally involved in acute opioid withdrawal effects in rodents, the data provide a plausible neuronal mechanism by which the increased sensitivity to pain after opioid suspension is mediated in humans.

Enhancement of Meditation Analgesia by Opioid Antagonist in Experienced Meditators

OBJECTIVE

Studies have consistently shown that long-term meditation practice is associated with reduced pain, but the neural mechanisms by which long-term meditation practice reduces pain remain unclear. This study tested endogenous opioid involvement in meditation analgesia associated with long-term meditation practice.

METHODS

Electrical pain was induced with randomized, double-blind, cross-over administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone (0.15-mg/kg bolus dose, then 0.2-mg/kg per hour infusion dose) with 32 healthy, experienced meditation practitioners and a standardized open monitoring meditation.

RESULTS

Under saline, pain ratings were significantly lower during meditation (pain intensity: 6.41 ± 1.32; pain unpleasantness: 3.98 ± 2.17) than at baseline (pain intensity: 6.86 ±1.04, t(31) = 2.476, p = .019, Cohen's d = 0.46; pain unpleasantness: 4.96 ±1.75, t(31) = 3.746, p = .001, Cohen's d = 0.68), confirming the presence of meditation analgesia. Comparing saline and naloxone revealed significantly lower pain intensity (t(31) = 3.12, p = .004, d = 0.56), and pain unpleasantness (t(31) = 3.47, p = .002, d = 0.62), during meditation under naloxone (pain intensity: 5.53 ± 1.54; pain unpleasantness: 2.95 ± 1.88) than under saline (pain intensity: 6.41 ± 1.32; pain unpleasantness: 3.98 ± 2.17). Naloxone not only failed to eliminate meditation analgesia but also made meditation analgesia stronger.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term meditation practice does not rely on endogenous opioids to reduce pain. Naloxone's blockade of opioid receptors enhanced meditation analgesia; pain ratings during meditation were significantly lower under naloxone than under saline. Possible biological mechanisms by which naloxone-induced opioid receptor blockade enhances meditation analgesia are discussed.

Role of the guanine nucleotide binding protein, Gαo, in the development of morphine tolerance and dependence

RATIONALE

The use of morphine and other opioids for chronic pain is limited by the development of analgesic tolerance and physical dependence. Morphine produces its effects by activating the μ opioid receptor, which couples to Gαi/o-containing heterotrimeric G proteins. Evidence suggests that the antinociceptive effects of morphine are mediated by Gαo. However, the role of Gαo in the development of morphine tolerance and dependence is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to evaluate the contribution of Gαo to the development of morphine tolerance and dependence in mice.

METHODS

129S6 mice lacking one copy of the Gαo gene (Gαo +/-) were administered morphine acutely or chronically. Mice were examined for tolerance to the antinociceptive action of morphine using the 52 °C hot plate as the nociceptive stimulus and for dependence by evaluating the severity of naltrexone-precipitated withdrawal. Wild-type littermates of the Gαo +/- mice were used as controls. Changes in μ receptor number and function were determined in midbrain and hindbrain homogenates using radioligand binding and μ agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding, respectively.

RESULTS

Following either acute or chronic morphine treatment, all mice developed antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence, regardless of genotype. With chronic morphine treatment, Gαo +/- mice developed tolerance faster and displayed more severe naltrexone-precipitated withdrawal in some behaviors than did wild-type littermates. Morphine tolerance was not associated with changes in μ receptor number or function in brain homogenates from either wild-type or Gαo +/- mice.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the guanine nucleotide binding protein Gαo offers some protection against the development of morphine tolerance and dependence.

Naloxone prolongs cutaneous nociceptive block by lidocaine in rats

We aimed to investigate the local anesthetic properties of naloxone alone or as an adjunct for the local anesthetic lidocaine. After the block of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) with drugs delivery by subcutaneous infiltration, cutaneous nociceptive block was tested on the ratsꞌ backs. We demonstrated that naloxone, as well as lidocaine, elicited cutaneous analgesia dose-dependently. The relative potency in inducing cutaneous analgesia was lidocaine [22.6 (20.1 - 25.4) μmol/kg] > naloxone [43.2 (40.3 - 46.4) μmol/kg] (P < 0.05). On an equianesthetic basis [50% effective dose (ED₅₀ ), ED₂₅ , and ED₇₅ ], naloxone displayed a greater duration of cutaneous analgesic action than lidocaine (P < 0.01). Coadministration of lidocaine (ED₉₅ or ED₅₀ ) and ineffective-dose naloxone (13.3 μmol/kg) intensifies sensory block (P < 0.01) with prolonged duration of action (P < 0.001) compared with lidocaine (ED₉₅ or ED₅₀ ) alone or naloxone (13.3 μmol/kg) alone on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. The preclinical data showed that naloxone is less potent than lidocaine as an infiltrative anesthetic, but its analgesic duration was longer than that of lidocaine. Furthermore, naloxone prolongs lidocaine analgesia, acting synergistically for nociceptive block.

The role of morphine on rat neural stem cells viability, neuro-angiogenesis and neuro-steroidgenesis properties

A lack of comprehensive data exists on the effect of morphine on neural stem cell neuro-steroidogenesis and neuro-angiogenesis properties. We, herein, investigated the effects of morphine (100μM), naloxone (100μM) and their combination on rat neural stem cells viability, clonogenicity and Ki-67 expression over a period of 72h. Any alterations in the total fatty acids profile under treatment protocols were elucidated by direct transesterification method. We also monitored the expression of p53, aromatase and 5-alpha reductase by real-time PCR assay. To examine angiogenic capacity, in vitro tubulogenesis and the level of VE-cadherin transcript were investigated during neural to endothelial differentiation under the experimental procedure. Cells supplemented with morphine displayed reduced survival (p<0.01) and clonogenicity (p<0.001). Flow cytometric analysis showed a decrease in Ki-67 during 72h. Naloxone potentially blunted morphine-induced all effects. The normal levels of fatty acids, including saturated and unsaturated were altered by naloxone and morphine supplements. Following 48h, the up-regulation of p53, aromatase and 5-alpha reductase genes occurred in morphine-primed cells. Using three-dimensional culture models of angiogenesis and real time PCR assay, we showed morphine impaired the tubulogenesis properties of neural stem cells (p<0.001) by the inhibition of trans-differentiation into vascular cells and led to decrease of in VE-cadherin expression. Collectively, morphine strongly impaired the healthy status of neural stem cells by inducing p53 and concurrent elevation of aromatase and 5-alpha reductase activities especially during early 48h. Also, neural stem cells-being exposed to morphine lost their potency to elicit angiogenesis.

Analgesic effectiveness and tolerability of oral oxycodone/naloxone and pregabalin in patients with lung cancer and neuropathic pain: an observational analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-related pain has a severe negative impact on quality of life. Combination analgesic therapy with oxycodone and pregabalin is effective for treating neuropathic cancer pain. We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of a dose-escalation combination therapy with prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone (OXN-PR) and pregabalin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and severe neuropathic pain.

METHODS

This was a 4-week, open-label, observational study. Patients were treated with OXN-PR and pregabalin. Average pain intensity ([API] measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale) and neuropathic pain (Douleur Neuropathique 4) were assessed at study entry and at follow-up visits. The primary endpoint was response to treatment, defined as a reduction of API at T28 ≥30% from baseline. Secondary endpoints included other efficacy measures, as well as patient satisfaction and quality of life (Brief Pain Inventory Short Form), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Symptom Distress Scale; bowel function was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were enrolled. API at baseline was 8.0±0.9, and decreased after 4 weeks by 48% (4.2±1.9; P<0.0001 vs baseline); 46 (82.1%) patients responded to treatment. Significant improvements were also reported in number/severity of breakthrough cancer pain episodes (P=0.001), Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (P=0.0002), Symptom Distress Scale (P<0.0001), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression (P=0.0006) and anxiety (P<0.0001) subscales, and bowel function (P=0.0003). At study end, 37 (66.0%) patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the new analgesic treatment. Combination therapy had a good safety profile.

CONCLUSION

OXN-PR and pregabalin were safe and highly effective in a real-world setting of severe neuropathic cancer pain, with a high rate of satisfaction, without interference on bowel function.

Ultralow Dose of Naloxone as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Improves Perceived Quality of Sleep but Fails to Alter Persistent Pain: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Introduction:

This randomized, cross-over, double-blind, controlled study of continuous intrathecal morphine administration in patients with severe, long-term pain addresses whether the supplementation of low doses of naloxone in this setting is associated with beneficial clinical effects.

Methods:

All of the study subjects (n=11) provided informed consent and were recruited from a subset of patients who were already undergoing long-term treatment with continuous intrathecal morphine because of difficult-to-treat pain. The patients were (in a randomized order) also given intrathecal naloxone (40 ng/24 h or 400 ng/24 h). As control, the patients’ ordinary dose of morphine without any additions was used. The pain (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS) during activity, perceived quality of sleep, level of activity, and quality of life as well as the levels of several proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the blood were assessed. The prestudy pain (NRS during activity) in the study group ranged from 3 to 10.

Results:

A total of 64% of the subjects reported improved quality of sleep during treatment with naloxone at a dose of 40 ng per 24 hours as compared with 9% with sham treatment (P=0.024). Although not statistically significant, pain was reduced by 2 NRS steps or more during supplemental treatment with naloxone in 36% of subjects when using the 40 ng per 24 hours dose and in 18% of the subjects when using naloxone 400 ng per 24 hours dose. The corresponding percentage among patients receiving unaltered treatment was 27%.

Conclusions:

To conclude, the addition of an ultralow dose of intrathecal naloxone (40 ng/24 h) to intrathecal morphine infusion in patients with severe, persistent pain improved perceived quality of sleep. We were not able to show any statistically significant effects of naloxone on pain relief, level of activity, or quality of life.

Therapeutic innovation: Inflammatory-reactive astrocytes as targets of inflammation

This study aimed to test pharmaceutical compounds targeting astrocytes showing inflammatory dysregulation. The primary rat brain cultures were treated with different batches of serum with or without microglia added to make the cells inflammatory-reactive. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and tryptase were used as inflammatory inducers. Expression levels of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase, and matrix metalloprotease-13 (MMP-13), as well as actin filament organization, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and intracellular Ca²⁺ release, were evaluated. LPS combined with tryptase upregulated TLR4 expression, whereas Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase expression was downregulated, ATP-evoked Ca²⁺ transients were increased, actin filaments were reorganized and ring structures instead of stress fibers were observed. Other aims of the study were to prevent astrocytes from becoming inflammatory-reactive and to restore inflammatory dysregulated cellular changes. A combination of the μ-opioid antagonist (-)-naloxone in ultra-low concentrations, the non-addictive μ-opioid agonist (-)-linalool, and the anti-epileptic agent levetiracetam was examined. The results indicated that this drug cocktail prevented the LPS- and tryptase-induced inflammatory dysregulation. The drug cocktail could also restore the LPS- and tryptase-treated cells back to a normal physiological level in terms of the analyzed parameters.

Definition, diagnosis and treatment strategies for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction–Recommendations of the Nordic Working Group

Background and aims

Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD) is an increasing problem due to the common use of opioids for pain worldwide. It manifests with different symptoms, such as dry mouth, gastro-oesophageal reflux, vomiting, bloating, abdominal pain, anorexia, hard stools, constipation and incomplete evacuation. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is one of its many symptoms and probably the most prevalent. The current review describes the pathophysiology, clinical implications and treatment of OIBD.

Methods

The Nordic Working Group was formed to provide input for Scandinavian specialists in multiple, relevant areas. Seven main topics with associated statements were defined. The working plan provided a structured format for systematic reviews and included instructions on how to evaluate the level of evidence according to the GRADE guidelines. The quality of evidence supporting the different statements was rated as high, moderate or low. At a second meeting, the group discussed and voted on each section with recommendations (weak and strong) for the statements.

Results

The literature review supported the fact that opioid receptors are expressed throughout the gastrointestinal tract. When blocked by exogenous opioids, there are changes in motility, secretion and absorption of fluids, and sphincter function that are reflected in clinical symptoms. The group supported a recent consensus statement for OIC, which takes into account the change in bowel habits for at least one week rather than focusing on the frequency of bowel movements. Many patients with pain receive opioid therapy and concomitant constipation is associated with increased morbidity and utilization of healthcare resources. Opioid treatment for acute postoperative pain will prolong the postoperative ileus and should also be considered in this context. There are no available tools to assess OIBD, but many rating scales have been developed to assess constipation, and a few specifically address OIC. A clinical treatment strategy for OIBD/OIC was proposed and presented in a flowchart. First-line treatment of OIC is conventional laxatives, lifestyle changes, tapering the opioid dosage and alternative analgesics. Whilst opioid rotation may also improve symptoms, these remain unalleviated in a substantial proportion of patients. Should conventional treatment fail, mechanism-based treatment with opioid antagonists should be considered, and they show advantages over laxatives. It should not be overlooked that many reasons for constipation other than OIBD exist, which should be taken into consideration in the individual patient.

Conclusion and implications

It is the belief of this Nordic Working Group that increased awareness of adverse effects and OIBD, particularly OIC, will lead to better pain treatment in patients on opioid therapy. Subsequently, optimised therapy will improve quality of life and, from a socio-economic perspective, may also reduce costs associated with hospitalisation, sick leave and early retirement in these patients.

Contribution of adrenomedullin to the switch of G protein-coupled μ-opioid receptors from Gi to Gs in the spinal dorsal horn following chronic morphine exposure in rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chronic exposure to morphine increases spinal adrenomedullin (AM) bioactivity resulting in the development and maintenance of morphine tolerance. This study investigated the possible involvement of AM in morphine-evoked alteration in μ-opioid receptor-coupled G proteins.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Agents were administered intrathecally (i.t.) in rats. Nociceptive behaviours and cumulative dose-response of morphine analgesia were assessed. Neurochemicals in the spinal dorsal horn were assayed by immunoprecipitation, Western blot analysis and ELISA.

KEY RESULTS

Intrathecal injection of AM (8 μg) for 9 days decreased and increased the levels of μ receptor-coupled Gi and Gs proteins respectively. Morphine stimulation (5 μg) after chronic treatment with AM also induced an increase in cAMP production in the spinal dorsal horn. Co-administration of the selective AM receptor antagonist AM22-52 inhibited chronic morphine-evoked switch of G protein-coupled μ receptor from Gi to Gs. Chronic exposure to AM increased the phosphorylation of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) and ERK. Co-administration of the PKA inhibitor H-89 (5 μg) or MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 (1 μg) reversed the AM-induced thermal/mechanical hypersensitivity, decline in morphine analgesic potency, switch of G protein-coupled μ receptor and increase in cAMP.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The present study supports the hypothesis that an increase in AM activity in the spinal dorsal horn contributes to the switch of the μ receptor-coupled G protein from Gi to Gs protein via the activation of cAMP/PKA/CREB and ERK signalling pathways in chronic morphine use.

Chronic loss of noradrenergic tone produces β-arrestin2-mediated cocaine hypersensitivity and alters cellular D2 responses in the nucleus accumbens

Cocaine blocks plasma membrane monoamine transporters and increases extracellular levels of dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-HT). The addictive properties of cocaine are mediated primarily by DA, while NE and 5-HT play modulatory roles. Chronic inhibition of dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH), which converts DA to NE, increases the aversive effects of cocaine and reduces cocaine use in humans, and produces behavioral hypersensitivity to cocaine and D2 agonism in rodents, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. We found a decrease in β-arrestin2 (βArr2) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) following chronic genetic or pharmacological DBH inhibition, and overexpression of βArr2 in the NAc normalized cocaine-induced locomotion in DBH knockout (Dbh -/-) mice. The D2/3 agonist quinpirole decreased excitability in NAc medium spiny neurons (MSNs) from control, but not Dbh -/- animals, where instead there was a trend for an excitatory effect. The Gαi inhibitor NF023 abolished the quinpirole-induced decrease in excitability in control MSNs, but had no effect in Dbh -/- MSNs, whereas the Gαs inhibitor NF449 restored the ability of quinpirole to decrease excitability in Dbh -/- MSNs, but had no effect in control MSNs. These results suggest that chronic loss of noradrenergic tone alters behavioral responses to cocaine via decreases in βArr2 and cellular responses to D2/D3 activation, potentially via changes in D2-like receptor G-protein coupling in NAc MSNs.

Glial dysfunction and persistent neuropathic postsurgical pain

BACKGROUND

Acute pain in response to injury is an important mechanism that serves to protect living beings from harm. However, persistent pain remaining long after the injury has healed serves no useful purpose and is a disabling condition. Persistent postsurgical pain, which is pain that lasts more than 3 months after surgery, affects 10-50% of patients undergoing elective surgery. Many of these patients are affected by neuropathic pain which is characterised as a pain caused by lesion or disease in the somatosensory nervous system. When established, this type of pain is difficult to treat and new approaches for prevention and treatment are needed. A possible contributing mechanism for the transition from acute physiological pain to persistent pain involves low-grade inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), glial dysfunction and subsequently an imbalance in the neuron-glial interaction that causes enhanced and prolonged pain transmission.

AIM

This topical review aims to highlight the contribution that inflammatory activated glial cell dysfunction may have for the development of persistent pain.

METHOD

Relevant literature was searched for in PubMed.

RESULTS

Immediately after an injury to a nerve ending in the periphery such as in surgery, the inflammatory cascade is activated and immunocompetent cells migrate to the site of injury. Macrophages infiltrate the injured nerve and cause an inflammatory reaction in the nerve cell. This reaction leads to microglia activation in the central nervous system and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines that activate and alter astrocyte function. Once the astrocytes and microglia have become activated, they participate in the development, spread, and potentiation of low-grade neuroinflammation. The inflammatory activated glial cells exhibit cellular changes, and their communication to each other and to neurons is altered. This renders neurons more excitable and pain transmission is enhanced and prolonged. Astrocyte dysfunction can be experimentally restored using the combined actions of a μ-opioid receptor agonist, a μ-opioid receptor antagonist, and an anti-epileptic agent. To find these agents we searched the literature for substances with possible anti-inflammatory properties that are usually used for other purposes in medicine. Inflammatory induced glial cell dysfunction is restorable in vitro by a combination of endomorphine-1, ultralow doses of naloxone and levetiracetam. Restoring inflammatory-activated glial cells, thereby restoring astrocyte-neuron interaction has the potential to affect pain transmission in neurons.

CONCLUSION

Surgery causes inflammation at the site of injury. Peripheral nerve injury can cause low-grade inflammation in the CNS known as neuroinflammation. Low-grade neuroinflammation can cause an imbalance in the glial-neuron interaction and communication. This renders neurons more excitable and pain transmission is enhanced and prolonged. Astrocytic dysfunction can be restored in vitro by a combination of endomorphin-1, ultralow doses of naloxone and levetiracetam. This restoration is essential for the interaction between astrocytes and neurons and hence also for modulation of synaptic pain transmission.

IMPLICATIONS

Larger studies in clinical settings are needed before these findings can be applied in a clinical context. Potentially, by targeting inflammatory activated glial cells and not only neurons, a new arena for development of pharmacological agents for persistent pain is opened.

Molecular Changes in Opioid Addiction: The Role of Adenylyl Cyclase and cAMP/PKA System

For centuries, opiate analgesics have had a considerable presence in the treatment of moderate to severe pain. While effective in providing analgesia, opiates are notorious in exerting many undesirable adverse reactions. The receptor targets and the intracellular effectors of opioids have largely been identified. Furthermore, much of the mechanisms underlying the development of tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal have been delineated. Thus, there is a focus on developing novel compounds or strategies in mitigating or avoiding the development of tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal. This review focuses on the adenylyl cyclase and cyclic adenosine 3,5-monophosphate (cAMP)/protein kinase A (AC/cAMP/PKA) system as the central player in mediating the acute and chronic effects of opioids. This chapter also reviews the neuronal adaptive changes in the locus coeruleus, amygdala, periaqueductal gray, and ventral tegmental area induced by acute and chronic actions of opioid because these neuronal adaptive changes in these regions may underlie the behavioral changes observed in opiate users and abusers.

A randomized clinical trial of the effects of ultra-low-dose naloxone infusion on postoperative opioid requirements and recovery

BACKGROUND

Tolerance to remifentanil during sevoflurane anesthesia may increase postoperative analgesic requirements. Low-dose naloxone not only has been shown to block the development of acute opioid tolerance but also to ameliorate undesired opioid-induced side effects. We hypothesized that naloxone prevents the acute opioid tolerance produced by a large dose of remifentanil, and reduces the incidence of opioid-induced side effects.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients undergoing open colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to receive intraoperative remifentanil (1) small dose at 0.1 μg/kg/min; (2) large dose at 0.30 μg/kg/min; or (3) large dose at 0.30 μg/kg/min combined with low-dose naloxone at 0.25 μg/kg/h just after the induction. Cumulative morphine consumption, postoperative pain scores, incidence of opioid-related side effects, time to recovery of bowel function, and length of hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

Cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h after surgery was higher in the large-dose remifentanil group (28 ± 12 mg) compared with the small-dose remifentanil group (17 ± 12 mg), and large-dose remifentanil-naloxone group (18 ± 9 mg), (P < 0.001). The median time to return of bowel function was shorter in the large-dose remifentanil-naloxone group than the other two groups (P < 0.05). The median length of hospital stay was lower in the large-dose remifentanil-naloxone group (8 [interquartile range: 8-12] days) compared with the small-dose remifentanil group (12 [interquartile range: 9-15] days) and large-dose remifentanil group (12 [interquartile range: 10-13] days), (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Naloxone infusion prevented the acute opioid tolerance, provided a quicker recovery of bowel function, and reduced the length of hospital stay after open colorectal surgery.

μ-Opioid receptor 6-transmembrane isoform: A potential therapeutic target for new effective opioids

The μ-opioid receptor (MOR) is the primary target for opioid analgesics. MOR induces analgesia through the inhibition of second messenger pathways and the modulation of ion channels activity. Nevertheless, cellular excitation has also been demonstrated, and proposed to mediate reduction of therapeutic efficacy and opioid-induced hyperalgesia upon prolonged exposure to opioids. In this mini-perspective, we review the recently identified, functional MOR isoform subclass, which consists of six transmembrane helices (6 TM) and may play an important role in MOR signaling. There is evidence that 6 TM MOR signals through very different cellular pathways and may mediate excitatory cellular effects rather than the classic inhibitory effects produced by the stimulation of the major (7 TM) isoform. Therefore, the development of 6 TM and 7 TM MOR selective compounds represents a new and exciting opportunity to better understand the mechanisms of action and the pharmacodynamic properties of a new class of opioids.

Biased signalling: the instinctive skill of the cell in the selection of appropriate signalling pathways

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) are members of a family of proteins which are generally regarded as the largest group of therapeutic drug targets. Ligands of GPCRs do not usually activate all cellular signalling pathways linked to a particular seven-transmembrane receptor in a uniform manner. The fundamental idea behind this concept is that each ligand has its own ability, while interacting with the receptor, to activate different signalling pathways (or a particular set of signalling pathways) and it is this concept which is known as biased signalling. The importance of biased signalling is that it may selectively activate biological responses to favour therapeutically beneficial signalling pathways and to avoid adverse effects. There are two levels of biased signalling. First, bias can arise from the ability of GPCRs to couple to a subset of the available G-protein subtypes: Gαs, Gαq/11, Gαi/o or Gα12/13. These subtypes produce the diverse effects of GPCRs by targeting different effectors. Secondly, biased GPCRs may differentially activate G-proteins or β-arrestins. β-Arrestins are ubiquitously expressed and function to terminate or inhibit classic G-protein signalling and initiate distinct β-arrestin-mediated signalling processes. The interplay of G-protein and β-arrestin signalling largely determines the cellular consequences of the administration of GPCR-targeted drugs. In the present review, we highlight the particular functionalities of biased signalling and discuss its biological effects subsequent to GPCR activation. We consider that biased signalling is potentially allowing a choice between signalling through ‘beneficial’ pathways and the avoidance of ‘harmful’ ones.

Development of opioid-induced constipation: post hoc analysis of data from a 12-week prospective, open-label, blinded-endpoint streamlined study in low-back pain patients treated with prolonged-release WHO step III opioids

BACKGROUND

Opioid-induced constipation is the most prevalent patient complaint associated with longer-term opioid use and interferes with analgesic efficacy, functionality, quality of life, and patient compliance.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the effects of prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone plus PR naloxone (OXN) vs PR oxycodone (OXY) vs PR morphine (MOR) on bowel function under real-life conditions in chronic low-back pain patients refractory to World Health Organization (WHO) step I and/or II analgesics.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the complete data set from a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) streamlined study (German pain study registry: 2012-0012-05; European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials [EudraCT]: 2012-001317-16), carried out in 88 centers in Germany, where a total of 901 patients requiring WHO step III opioids to treat low-back pain were enrolled and prospectively observed for 3 months. Opioid allocation was based on either optional randomization (n=453) or physician decision (n=448). In both groups, treatment doses could be adjusted as per the German prescribing information, and physicians were free to address all side effects and tolerability issues as usual. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining normal bowel function throughout the complete treatment period, assessed with the Bowel Function Index (BFI). Secondary analyses addressed absolute and relative BFI changes, complete spontaneous bowel movements, use of laxatives, treatment emergent adverse events, analgesic effects, and differences between randomized vs nonrandomized patient groups.

RESULTS

BFI changed significantly with all three WHO step III treatments, however significantly less with OXN vs OXY and MOR despite a significantly higher use of laxatives with the latter ones (P<0.001). The percentage of patients who maintained normal BFI scores despite opioid treatment was 54.5% (164/301) with OXN and was significantly superior to those seen with OXY (32.8% [98/300]) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-3.44; P<0.001) or MOR (29.7% [89/300]) (OR: 2.84, 95% CI: 2.03-3.97; P<0.001). Absolute BFI changes of ≥12mm 100 mm horizontal visual analog scale (VAS100) vs. baseline were seen for OXN in 41.4%, for OXY in 68.7%, and for MOR in 72.3%. Complete spontaneous bowel movements decreased at least by one per week in 10.3% with OXN vs 42.3% for OXY (OR: 6.39, 95% CI 4.13-9.89; P<0.001) and 42.0% for MOR (OR: 6.31, 95% CI: 4.08-9.76; P<0.001). Overall, 359 treatment emergent adverse events (78 [OXN], 134 [OXY], and 147 [MOR]) in 204 patients (41 [OXN], 80 [OXY], and 83 [MOR]) occurred, most affecting the gastrointestinal (49.3%) and the nervous system (39.3%). Treatment contrasts between randomized vs nonrandomized patients were insignificant.

CONCLUSION

In this post hoc analysis of data from a real-life 12-week study, OXN treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of opioid-induced constipation, superior tolerability, and significantly better analgesic efficacy compared with OXY and MOR.

Naloxone added to bupivacaine or bupivacaine-fentanyl prolongs motor and sensory block during supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In this study, the effect of naloxone on duration of supraclavicular brachial plexus block was evaluated. It was hypothesized that naloxone can increase the duration of neural blockade.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients scheduled for surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block were randomly assigned to receive 30 ml bupivacaine (Group C); 30 ml bupivacaine with 100 μg of fentanyl (Group F); 30 ml bupivacaine with 100 ng naloxone (Group N); or 30 ml bupivacaine with 100 μg of fentanyl and 100 ng naloxone (Group N + F). Sensory and motor blockade were recorded at 5, 15, and 30 min following the block, and every 10 min following the end of surgery. Duration of sensory and motor block was considered to be the time interval between the complete block and the first postoperative pain and complete recovery of motor functions.

RESULTS

Sensory and motor onset times were the same in all groups. The duration of sensory and motor block in Group C (11.3 ± 1.7 h and 4.56 ± 1.0 h) and Group F (12.8 ± 3.3 h and 5.1 ± 2.0 h) were less than in the other groups (18.1 ± 2.2 h and 6.18 ± 1.0 h in Group N, and 15.8 ± 2.9 h and 6.53 ± 1.1 h in Group N + F, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Addition of naloxone to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block prolonged the duration of the neural blockade.

(+)-Naloxone inhibits morphine-induced chemotaxis via prevention of heat shock protein 90 cleavage in microglia

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Microglia have a crucial role in maintaining neuronal homeostasis in the central nervous system. Immune factors released from microglia have important roles in nociceptive signal transduction. Activation of microglia seems to be a shared mechanism in pathological pain and morphine tolerance because pharmacological attenuation of microglia activation provides satisfactory management in both situations.

METHODS

In the present study, we investigated the effect of 1nM (+)-naloxone, which is not an opioid receptor antagonist, on morphine-induced activation of microglia EOC13.31 cells.

RESULTS

Our results showed that 1μM morphine enhanced microglia activation and migration, decreased α-tubulin acetylation, and induced heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) fragmentation and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) expression. Morphine-induced α-tubulin deacetylation and HSP90 fragmentation were HDAC6-dependent. Pretreatment with (+)-naloxone (1nM) inhibited morphine-evoked microglia activation and chemotaxis and prevented α-tubulin deacetylation and HSP90 fragmentation by inhibiting HDAC6 expression.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of the present study, we suggest that (+)-naloxone inhibits morphine-induced microglia activation by regulating HDAC6-dependent α-tubulin deacetylation and HSP90 fragmentation.

Safety and efficacy of oxycodone/naloxone vs. oxycodone vs. morphine for the treatment of chronic low back pain: results of a 12 week prospective, randomized, open-label blinded endpoint streamlined study with prolonged-release preparations

BACKGROUND

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most prevalent patient complaint associated with opioid use and interferes with analgesic efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

This PROBE trial compares the overall safety and tolerability of oxycodone/naloxone (OXN) with those of traditional opioid therapy with oxycodone (OXY) or morphine (MOR) in the setting of the German healthcare system.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) streamlined study (German pain study registry: 2012-0012-05; EudraCT: 2012-001317-16), carried out in 88 centers in Germany, where a total of 453 patients, requiring WHO step III opioids to treat low back pain, were randomized to OXN, OXY or MOR (1:1:1) for 3 months. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients without adverse event-related study discontinuations who presented with a combination of a ≥50% improvement of pain intensity, disability and quality-of-life and a ≤50% worsening of bowel function at study end.

RESULTS

Significantly more OXN patients met the primary endpoint (22.2%) vs. OXY (9.3%; OR: 2.80; p < 0.001) vs. MOR (6.3%; OR: 4.23; p < 0.001), with insignificant differences between OXY vs. MOR (p = 0.155). A ≥50% improvement of pain intensity, functional disability and quality-of-life has been found for OXN in 75.0/61.1/66.0% of patients and thus for all parameters significantly more than with OXY (58.9/49.0/48.3; p < 0.001 for each) or MOR (52.5/46.2/37.3; p < 0.001 for each). A total of 86.8% of OXN patients kept normal BFI scores during treatment, vs. 63.6% for OXY (p < 0.001) vs. 53.8% for MOR (p < 0.001). Overall 189 TEAEs (OXN: 45, OXY: 69, MOR: 75) in 92 patients (OXN: 21, OXY: 44, MOR: 37) occurred, most gastrointestinal (50.8%). One limitation is the open-label design, which presents the possibility of interpretive bias.

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions of this PROBE design, OXN was associated with a significantly better tolerability, a lower risk of OIC and a significantly better analgesic efficacy than OXY or MOR.

Actin filament reorganization in astrocyte networks is a key functional step in neuroinflammation resulting in persistent pain: novel findings on network restoration

In recent years, the importance of glial cell activation in the generation and maintenance of long-term pain has been investigated. One novel mechanism underlying long-lasting pain is injury-induced inflammation in the periphery, followed by microglial activation in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, which results in local neuroinflammation. An increase in neuronal excitability may follow, with intense signaling along the pain tracts to the thalamus and the parietal cortex along with other cortical regions for the identification and recognition of the injury. If the local neuroinflammation develops into a pathological state, then the astrocytes become activated. Previous studies in which lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was used to induce inflammation have shown that in a dysfunctional astrocyte network, the actin cytoskeleton is reorganized from the normally occurring F-actin stress fibers into the more diffusible, disorganized, ring-form globular G-actin. In addition, Ca(2+) signaling systems are altered, Na(+)- and glutamate transporters are downregulated, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-1β, are released in dysfunctional astrocyte networks. In a series of experiments, we have demonstrated that these LPS-induced changes in astrocyte function can be restored by stimulation of Gi/o and inhibition of Gs with a combination of a μ-receptor agonist and ultralow concentrations of a μ-receptor antagonist and by inhibition of cytokine release, particularly IL-1β, by the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam. These findings could be of clinical significance and indicate a novel treatment for long-term pain.

Acute morphine alters GABAergic transmission in the central amygdala during naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal: role of cyclic AMP

The central amygdala (CeA) plays an important role in opioid addiction. Therefore, we examined the effects of naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal (WD) on GABAergic transmission in rat CeA neurons using whole-cell recordings with naloxone in the bath. The basal frequency of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) increased in CeA neurons from WD compared to placebo rats. Acute morphine (10 μ M) had mixed effects (≥20% change from baseline) on mIPSCs in placebo and WD rats. In most CeA neurons (64%) from placebo rats, morphine significantly decreased mIPSC frequency and amplitude. In 32% of placebo neurons, morphine significantly increased mIPSC amplitudes but had no effect on mIPSC frequency. In WD rats, acute morphine significantly increased mIPSC frequency but had no effect on mIPSC amplitude in 41% of CeA neurons. In 45% of cells, acute morphine significantly decreased mIPSC frequency and amplitude. Pre-treatment with the cyclic AMP inhibitor (R)-adenosine, cyclic 3',5'-(hydrogenphosphorothioate) triethylammonium (RP), prevented acute morphine-induced potentiation of mIPSCs. Pre-treatment of slices with the Gi/o G-protein subunit inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX) did not prevent the acute morphine-induced enhancement or inhibition of mIPSCs. PTX and RP decreased basal mIPSC frequencies and amplitudes only in WD rats. The results suggest that inhibition of GABAergic transmission in the CeA by acute morphine is mediated by PTX-insensitive mechanisms, although PTX-sensitive mechanisms cannot be ruled out for non-morphine responsive cells; by contrast, potentiation of GABAergic transmission is mediated by activated cAMP signaling that also mediates the increased basal GABAergic transmission in WD rats. Our data indicate that during the acute phase of WD, the CeA opioid and GABAergic systems undergo neuroadaptative changes conditioned by a previous chronic morphine exposure and dependence.