Nitric oxide-mediated resistance to photodynamic therapy in a human breast tumor xenograft model: Improved outcome with NOS2 inhibitors

Enhancing 5-ALA-PDT efficacy against resistant tumor cells: Strategies and advances

As a precursor of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), an endogenous pro-apoptotic and fluorescent molecule, 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) has gained substantial attention for its potential in fluorescence-guided surgery as well as photodynamic therapy (PDT). Moreover, 5-ALA-PDT has been suggested as a promising chemo-radio sensitization therapy for various cancers. However, insufficient 5-ALA-induced PpIX fluorescence and the induction of multiple resistance mechanisms may hinder the 5-ALA-PDT clinical outcome. Reduced efficacy and resistance to 5-ALA-PDT can result from genomic alterations, tumor heterogeneity, hypoxia, activation of pathways related to cell surveillance, production of nitric oxide, and most importantly, deregulated 5-ALA transporter proteins and heme biosynthesis enzymes. Understanding the resistance regulatory mechanisms of 5-ALA-PDT may allow the development of effective personalized cancer therapy. Here, we described the mechanisms underlying resistance to 5-ALA-PTD across various tumor types and explored potential strategies to overcome this resistance. Furthermore, we discussed future approaches that may enhance the efficacy of treatments using 5-ALA-PDT.

Upregulation of iNOS/NO in Cancer Cells That Survive a Photodynamic Challenge: Role of No in Accelerated Cell Migration and Invasion

Anti-tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a unique modality that employs a photosensitizer (PS), PS-exciting light, and O2 to generate cytotoxic oxidants. For various reasons, not all malignant cells in any given tumor will succumb to a PDT challenge. Previous studies by the authors revealed that nitric oxide (NO) from inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) plays a key role in tumor cell resistance and also stimulation of migratory/invasive aggressiveness of surviving cells. iNOS was the only NOS isoform implicated in these effects. Significantly, NO from stress-upregulated iNOS was much more important in this regard than NO from preexisting enzymes. Greater NO-dependent resistance, migration, and invasion was observed with at least three different cancer cell lines, and this was attenuated by iNOS activity inhibitors, NO scavengers, or an iNOS transcriptional inhibitor. NO diffusing from PDT-targeted cells also stimulated migration/invasion potency of non-targeted bystander cells. Unless counteracted by appropriate measures, all these effects could seriously compromise clinical PDT efficacy. Here, we will review specific examples of these negative side effects of PDT and how they might be suppressed by adjuvants such as NO scavengers or inhibitors of iNOS activity or expression.

Ferroptosis regulator NOS2 is closely associated with the prognosis and cell malignant behaviors of hepatoblastoma: a bioinformatic and in vitro study

Background

Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common liver tumor in children with easy metastasis. The emergence of ferroptosis as a novel form of cell death has gained increased attention in various human cancers. However, the roles of ferroptosis-related (FR) genes in HB remain elusive.

Methods

The GSE133039, GSE131329, and GSE81928 datasets were utilized for screening core FR genes in HB. Through Lasso regression analysis and using the support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithm, three candidate FR genes were obtained for characterizing HB. Their expression patterns and their clinical associations were explored through the 'Limma' R package, and their diagnostic potential was evaluated using ROC curves. Nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) emerged as a candidate for further analyses. The CIBERSORT algorithm and GSEA dataset were used to respectively investigate the immune and metabolism effects of NOS2; the former was validated through immunofluorescence. The GSDC database was employed to analyze the correlation between NOS2 expression and the therapeutic efficacy of multiple drugs. PCR, Western blotting, colony formation assays, and Transwell experiments, were used to determine biological functions of NOS2 in HB cells. Potential upstream transcription factors of NOS2 were predicted through the TRRUST, hTFtarget, GeneCards, and JASPAR databases.

Results

NQO1, SLC1A4, and NOS2 were identified as potential genes in HB and found to be significantly upregulated in tumor samples. Nevertheless, only NOS2 was closely associated with HB clinicopathological characteristics; high NOS2 expression indicated poor prognosis, metastatic tendency, and late clinical stage. Immune analyses indicated that high NOS2 expression was concomitant with decreased infiltration levels of CD8+ T cells but increased infiltration levels of macrophages. GSEA revealed that NOS2 failed to affect the enrichments of glycolysis, fatty acid metabolism, and cholesterol biosynthesis in HB. Moreover, NOS2 was positively correlated with the IC50 values of trametinib, lapatinib, and cisplatin. NOS2 overexpression promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion of HepG2 and HuH-6 cells. JUND was identified as a potential transcriptional regulator of NOS2 by binding to its promoter (5'-TTCTGACTCTTTT-3').

Conclusion

NOS2 plays a significant role in HB clinical assessments and holds promise as a novel therapeutic target.

Pro-Tumor Activity of Endogenous Nitric Oxide in Anti-Tumor Photodynamic Therapy: Recently Recognized Bystander Effects

Various studies have revealed that several cancer cell types can upregulate inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and iNOS-derived nitric oxide (NO) after moderate photodynamic treatment (PDT) sensitized by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin-IX. As will be discussed, the NO signaled cell resistance to photokilling as well as greater growth and migratory aggressiveness of surviving cells. On this basis, it was predicted that diffusible NO from PDT-targeted cells in a tumor might enhance the growth, migration, and invasiveness of non- or poorly PDT-targeted bystander cells. This was tested using a novel approach in which ALA-PDT-targeted cancer cells on a culture dish were initially segregated from non-targeted bystander cells of the same type via impermeable silicone-rimmed rings. Several hours after LED irradiation, the rings were removed, and both cell populations were analyzed in the dark for various responses. After a moderate extent of targeted cell killing (~25%), bystander proliferation and migration were evaluated, and both were found to be significantly enhanced. Enhancement correlated with iNOS/NO upregulation in surviving PDT-targeted cancer cells in the following cell type order: PC3 > MDA-MB-231 > U87 > BLM. If occurring in an actual PDT-challenged tumor, such bystander effects might compromise treatment efficacy by stimulating tumor growth and/or metastatic dissemination. Mitigation of these and other negative NO effects using pharmacologic adjuvants that either inhibit iNOS transcription or enzymatic activity will be discussed.

Understanding the Photodynamic Therapy Induced Bystander and Abscopal Effects: A Review

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved minimally/non-invasive treatment modality that has been used to treat various conditions, including cancer. The bystander and abscopal effects are two well-documented significant reactions involved in imparting long-term systemic effects in the field of radiobiology. The PDT-induced generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and immune responses is majorly involved in eliciting the bystander and abscopal effects. However, the results in this regard are unsatisfactory and unpredictable due to several poorly elucidated underlying mechanisms and other factors such as the type of cancer being treated, the irradiation dose applied, the treatment regimen employed, and many others. Therefore, in this review, we attempted to summarize the current knowledge regarding the non-targeted effects of PDT. The review is based on research published in the Web of Science, PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and Google Scholar databases up to June 2023. We have highlighted the current challenges and prospects in relation to obtaining clinically relevant robust, reproducible, and long-lasting antitumor effects, which may offer a clinically viable treatment against tumor recurrence and metastasis. The effectiveness of both targeted and untargeted PDT responses and their outcomes in clinics could be improved with more research in this area.

Hyper-Aggressiveness of Bystander Cells in an Anti-Tumor Photodynamic Therapy Model: Role of Nitric Oxide Produced by Targeted Cells

When selected tumor cells in a large in vitro population are exposed to ionizing radiation, they can send pro-survival signals to non-exposed counterparts (bystander cells). If there is no physical contact between irradiated and bystander cells, the latter respond to mediators from targeted cells that diffuse through the medium. One such mediator is known to be nitric oxide (NO). It was recently discovered that non-ionizing anti-tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) can also elicit pro-survival/expansion bystander effects in a variety of human cancer cells. A novel silicone ring-based approach was used for distinguishing photodynamically-targeted cells from non-targeted bystanders. A key finding was that NO from upregulated iNOS in surviving targeted cells diffused to the bystanders and caused iNOS/NO upregulation there, which in turn stimulated cell proliferation and migration. The intensity of these responses depended on the extent of iNOS/NO induction in targeted cells of different cancer lines. Moreover, the responses could be replicated using NO from the chemical donor DETA/NO. This review will focus on these and related findings, their negative implications for clinical PDT, and how these might be averted by using pharmacologic inhibitors of iNOS activity or transcription.

Role of nitric oxide in hyper-aggressiveness of tumor cells that survive various anti-cancer therapies

Low level nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in many malignant tumors is known to play a key role in the survival and proliferation of tumor cells. NO can also induce or augment resistance to anti-tumor treatments such as platinum-based chemotherapy (CT), ionizing radiotherapy (RT), and non-ionizing photodynamic therapy (PDT). In each of these treatments, tumor cells that survive the challenge may exhibit a striking increase in NO-dependent proliferative, migratory, and invasive aggressiveness compared with non-challenged controls. Moreover, NO from cells directly targeted by PDT can often stimulate aggressiveness in non- or poorly targeted bystander cells. Although NO-mediated resistance to many of these therapies is fairly-well recognized by now, the hyper-aggressiveness of surviving cells and bystander counterparts is not. We will focus on these negative aspects in this review, citing examples from the PDT, CT, and RT publications. Increased aggressiveness of cells that escape therapeutic elimination is a concern because it could enhance tumor progression and metastatic dissemination. Pharmacologic approaches for suppressing these negative responses will also be discussed, e.g., administering inhibitors of iNOS activity or iNOS expression as therapeutic adjuvants.

Adjuvant Photodynamic Therapy, Mediated via Topical Versus Systemic Administration of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Control of Murine Mammary Tumor after Surgical Resection

Treatment de-escalation is sought in the management of precursor lesions of early stage breast cancer, driving the appeal of adjuvant modalities to lumpectomy that reduce toxicity and minimally detract from patient quality of life. We investigate photodynamic therapy (PDT), with the photosensitizing prodrug, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), as adjuvant therapy to complete resection of murine mammary tumor (propagated from TUBO cells). ALA was delivered either systemically (oral, 250 mg kg^-1 ) at 5 h before 632 nm illumination or topically (20% solution) to the resection site at 10 min before light delivery to 135 J cm^-2 . Treatment with either oral-ALA-PDT (oALA-PDT) or topical-ALA-PDT (tALA-PDT) to the mammary fat pad after TUBO complete resection (CR) produced long-term tumor control with 90-day complete response rates of 21% and 32%, respectively, compared to control rates of 0-5% in mice receiving only CR. Thus, CR/tALA-PDT was equipotent to CR/oALA-PDT despite ~10-fold lower levels of ALA-induced protoporphyrin XI as photosensitizer after topical versus oral-ALA administration. CR/oALA-PDT produced more vascular damage, greater proportion of tissue-resident neutrophils and stronger inflammation when compared to CR/tALA-PDT. Collectively, these data provide rationale for ongoing investigation of ALA-PDT as adjuvant therapy after lumpectomy for increased probability of local control in the treatment of breast cancer.

The Negative Impact of Cancer Cell Nitric Oxide on Photodynamic Therapy

Numerous studies have shown that low-flux nitric oxide (NO) in tumors produced mainly by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2) can signal for angiogenesis, inhibition of apoptosis, and promotion of cell growth, migration, and invasion. Studies in the authors' laboratory have revealed that iNOS-derived NO in various cancer cell types elicits resistance to cytotoxic photodynamic therapy (PDT) and moreover endows PDT-surviving cells with more aggressive proliferation and migration/invasion. In this chapter, we describe how cancer cell iNOS/NO in vitro can be monitored in different PDT model systems (e.g., a targeted cell-bystander cell model) and how pharmacologic interference with basal and PDT-upregulated iNOS/NO can significantly improve PDT outcomes.

Progress in Nanocarriers Codelivery System to Enhance the Anticancer Effect of Photodynamic Therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising anticancer noninvasive method and has great potential for clinical applications. Unfortunately, PDT still has many limitations, such as metastatic tumor at unknown sites, inadequate light delivery and a lack of sufficient oxygen. Recent studies have demonstrated that photodynamic therapy in combination with other therapies can enhance anticancer effects. The development of new nanomaterials provides a platform for the codelivery of two or more therapeutic drugs, which is a promising cancer treatment method. The use of multifunctional nanocarriers for the codelivery of two or more drugs can improve physical and chemical properties, increase tumor site aggregation, and enhance the antitumor effect through synergistic actions, which is worthy of further study. This review focuses on the latest research progress on the synergistic enhancement of PDT by simultaneous multidrug administration using codelivery nanocarriers. We introduce the design of codelivery nanocarriers and discuss the mechanism of PDT combined with other antitumor methods. The combination of PDT and chemotherapy, gene therapy, immunotherapy, photothermal therapy, hyperthermia, radiotherapy, sonodynamic therapy and even multidrug therapy are discussed to provide a comprehensive understanding.

Current Advances in Photoactive Agents for Cancer Imaging and Therapy

Photoactive agents are promising complements for both early diagnosis and targeted treatment of cancer. The dual combination of diagnostics and therapeutics is known as theranostics. Photoactive theranostic agents are activated by a specific wavelength of light and emit another wavelength, which can be detected for imaging tumors, used to generate reactive oxygen species for ablating tumors, or both. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combines photosensitizer (PS) accumulation and site-directed light irradiation for simultaneous imaging diagnostics and spatially targeted therapy. Although utilized since the early 1900s, advances in the fields of cancer biology, materials science, and nanomedicine have expanded photoactive agents to modern medical treatments. In this review we summarize the origins of PDT and the subsequent generations of PSs and analyze seminal research contributions that have provided insight into rational PS design, such as photophysics, modes of cell death, tumor-targeting mechanisms, and light dosing regimens. We highlight optimizable parameters that, with further exploration, can expand clinical applications of photoactive agents to revolutionize cancer diagnostics and treatment.

Photodynamic Therapy as an Oxidative Anti-Tumor Modality: Negative Effects of Nitric Oxide on Treatment Efficacy

Anti-tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a unique oxidative stress-based modality that has proven highly effective on a variety of solid malignancies. PDT is minimally invasive and generates cytotoxic oxidants such as singlet molecular oxygen (¹O₂). With high tumor site-specificity and limited off-target negative effects, PDT is increasingly seen as an attractive alternative or follow-up to radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived bioactive free radical molecule that is exploited by many malignant tumors to promote cell survival, proliferation, and metastatic expansion. Typically generated endogenously by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2), low level NO can also antagonize many therapeutic interventions, including PDT. In addition to elevating resistance, iNOS-derived NO can stimulate growth and migratory aggressiveness of tumor cells that survive a PDT challenge. Moreover, NO from PDT-targeted cells in any given population is known to promote such aggressiveness in non-targeted counterparts (bystanders). Each of these negative responses to PDT and their possible underlying mechanisms will be discussed in this chapter. Promising pharmacologic approaches for mitigating these NO-mediated responses will also be discussed.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Anti-Human Cancer Experiments Investigating the Use of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (5-ALA) for Photodynamic Therapy

5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is an amino acid derivative and a precursor of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). The photophysical feature of PpIX is clinically used in photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) and photodynamic therapy (PDT). These clinical applications are potentially based on in vitro cell culture experiments. Thus, conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro 5-ALA PDT experiments is meaningful and may provide opportunities to consider future perspectives in this field. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed to summarize the in vitro 5-ALA PDT experiments and calculated the effectiveness of 5-ALA PDT for several cancer cell types. In total, 412 articles were identified, and 77 were extracted based on our inclusion criteria. The calculated effectiveness of 5-ALA PDT was statistically analyzed, which revealed a tendency of cancer-classification-dependent sensitivity to 5-ALA PDT, and stomach cancer was significantly more sensitive to 5-ALA PDT compared with cancers of different origins. Based on our analysis, we suggest a standardized in vitro experimental protocol for 5-ALA PDT.

Autophagy Regulation and Photodynamic Therapy: Insights to Improve Outcomes of Cancer Treatment

Cancer is considered an age-related disease that, over the next 10 years, will become the most prevalent health problem worldwide. Although cancer therapy has remarkably improved in the last few decades, novel treatment concepts are needed to defeat this disease. Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) signalize a pathway to treat and manage several types of cancer. Over the past three decades, new light sources and photosensitizers (PS) have been developed to be applied in PDT. Nevertheless, there is a lack of knowledge to explain the main biochemical routes needed to trigger regulated cell death mechanisms, affecting, considerably, the scope of the PDT. Although autophagy modulation is being raised as an interesting strategy to be used in cancer therapy, the main aspects referring to the autophagy role over cell succumbing PDT-photoinduced damage remain elusive. Several reports emphasize cytoprotective autophagy, as an ultimate attempt of cells to cope with the photo-induced stress and to survive. Moreover, other underlying molecular mechanisms that evoke PDT-resistance of tumor cells were considered. We reviewed the paradigm about the PDT-regulated cell death mechanisms that involve autophagic impairment or boosted activation. To comprise the autophagy-targeted PDT-protocols to treat cancer, it was underlined those that alleviate or intensify PDT-resistance of tumor cells. Thereby, this review provides insights into the mechanisms by which PDT can be used to modulate autophagy and emphasizes how this field represents a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment.

Nitric Oxide-elicited Resistance to Antitumor Photodynamic Therapy via Inhibition of Membrane Free Radical-mediated Lipid Peroxidation

This review focuses on the ability of nitric oxide (NO) to antagonize antitumor photodynamic therapy (PDT). NO's anti-PDT effects were recognized relatively recently and require a better mechanistic understanding for developing new strategies to improve PDT efficacy. Many PDT sensitizers (PSs) are amphiphilic and tend to localize in membrane compartments of tumor cells. Unsaturated lipids in these compartments can undergo peroxidative degradation after PS photoactivation. Primary Type I (free radical) vs. Type II (singlet oxygen) photochemistry of lipid peroxidation is discussed, along with light-independent turnover of primary lipid hydroperoxides to free radical species. Chain lipid peroxidation mediated by the latter exacerbates membrane damage and cytotoxicity after a PDT challenge. Our studies have shown that NO from chemical donors can suppress chain peroxidation by intercepting lipid-derived free radical intermediates, thereby protecting cancer cells against photokilling. More recent evidence has revealed that inducible NO synthase (iNOS) is dramatically upregulated in several cancer cell types after a photodynamic challenge, and that iNOS-derived NO enhances resistance as well as growth and migratory aggressiveness of surviving cells. Chain breaking by NO and other possible NO-based resistance mechanisms are discussed, along with novel pharmacologic approaches for overcoming these negative effects.

Expanding the Limits of Photodynamic Therapy: The Design of Organelles and Hypoxia-Targeting Nanomaterials for Enhanced Photokilling of Cancer

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive clinical protocol that combines a nontoxic photosensitizer (PS), appropriate visible light, and molecular oxygen for cancer treatment. This triad generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) in situ, leading to different cell death pathways and limiting the arrival of nutrients by irreversible destruction of the tumor vascular system. Despite the number of formulations and applications available, the advancement of therapy is hindered by some characteristics such as the hypoxic condition of solid tumors and the limited energy density (light fluence) that reaches the target. As a result, the use of PDT as a definitive monotherapy for cancer is generally restricted to pretumor lesions or neoplastic tissue of approximately 1 cm in size. To expand this limitation, researchers have synthesized functional nanoparticles (NPs) capable of carrying classical photosensitizers with self-supplying oxygen as well as targeting specific organelles such as mitochondria and lysosomes. This has improved outcomes in vitro and in vivo. This review highlights the basis of PDT, many of the most commonly used strategies of functionalization of smart NPs, and their potential to break the current limits of the classical protocol of PDT against cancer. The application and future perspectives of the multifunctional nanoparticles in PDT are also discussed in some detail.

Negative effects of tumor cell nitric oxide on anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy

Glioblastomas are highly aggressive brain tumors that can persist after exposure to conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in these tumors is known to foster malignant cell proliferation, migration, and invasion as well as resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. Minimally invasive photodynamic therapy (PDT) sensitized by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) is a highly effective anti-glioblastoma modality, but it is also subject to NO-mediated resistance. Studies by the authors have revealed that glioblastoma U87 and U251 cells use endogenous iNOS/NO to not only resist photokilling after an ALA/light challenge, but also to promote proliferation and migration/invasion of surviving cells. Stress-upregulated iNOS/NO was found to play a major role in these negative responses to PDT-like treatment. Our studies have revealed a tight network of upstream signaling events leading to iNOS induction in photostressed cells and transition to a more aggressive phenotype. These events include activation or upregulation of pro-survival/ pro-expansion effector proteins such as NF-κB, phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase-B (Akt), p300, Survivin, and Brd4. In addition to this upstream signaling and its regulation, pharmacologic approaches for directly suppressing iNOS at its activity vs. transcriptional level are discussed. One highly effective agent in the latter category is bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitor, JQ1, which was found to minimize iNOS upregulation in photostressed U87 cells. By acting similarly at the clinical level, a BET inhibitor such as JQ1 should markedly improve the efficacy of anti-glioblastoma PDT.

Nitric oxide-elicited resistance to anti-glioblastoma photodynamic therapy

Glioblastoma multiforme is a highly aggressive primary brain malignancy that resists most conventional chemo- and radiotherapeutic interventions. Nitric oxide (NO), a short lived free radical molecule produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in glioblastomas and other tumors, is known to play a key role in tumor persistence, progression, and chemo/radiotherapy resistance. Site-specific and minimally invasive photodynamic therapy (PDT), based on oxidative damage resulting from non-ionizing photoactivation of a sensitizing agent, is highly effective against glioblastoma, but resistance also exists in this case. Studies in the authors’ laboratory have shown that much of the latter is mediated by iNOS/NO. For example, when glioblastoma U87 or U251 cells sensitized in mitochondria with 5-aminolevulinic acid -induced protoporphyrin IX were exposed to a moderate dose of visible light, the observed apoptosis was strongly enhanced by an iNOS activity inhibitor or NO scavenger, indicating that iNOS/NO had increased cell resistance to photokilling. Moreover, cells that survived the photochallenge proliferated, migrated, and invaded more aggressively than controls, and these responses were also driven predominantly by iNOS/NO. Photostress-upregulated iNOS rather than basal enzyme was found to be responsible for all the negative effects described. Recognition of NO-mediated hyper-resistance/hyper-aggression in PDT-stressed glioblastoma has stimulated interest in how these responses can be prevented or at least minimized by pharmacologic adjuvants such as inhibitors of iNOS activity or transcription. Recent developments along these lines and their clinical potential for improving anti-glioblastoma PDT are discussed.

Tumor associated macrophages and 'NO'

Nitric oxide (NO) and its pro and anti-tumor activities are dual roles that continue to be debated in cancer biology. The cell situations in the tumor and within the tumor microenvironment also have roles involving NO. In early tumorigenic events, macrophages in the tumor microenvironment promote tumor cell death, and later are reprogramed to support the growth of tumor, through regulatory events involving NO and several stimulatory signals. These two opposing and active phenotypes of tumor associated macrophages known as the M1 or anti-tumorigenic state and M2 or pro-tumorigenic state show differences in metabolic pathways such as glycolysis and arginine utilization, signaling pathways and cytokine induction including iNOS expression, therefore contributing to their function. Polarization of M2 to M1 macrophages, inhibition of M2 state, or reprogramming via NO in combination with other signals may determine or alter tumor kinetics. These strategies and an overview are presented.

Nitric Oxide Inhibition of Chain Lipid Peroxidation Initiated by Photodynamic Action in Membrane Environments

Iron-catalyzed, free radical-mediated lipid peroxidation may play a major role in tumor cell killing by photodynamic therapy (PDT), particularly when membrane-localizing photosensitizers are employed. Many cancer cells exploit endogenous iNOS-generated NO for pro-survival/expansion purposes and for hyper-resistance to therapeutic modalities, including PDT. In addition to inhibiting the pro-oxidant activity of Fe(II) via nitrosylation, NO may intercept downstream lipid oxyl and peroxyl radicals, thereby acting as a chain-breaking antioxidant. We investigated this for the first time in the context of PDT by using POPC/Ch/PpIX (100:80:0.2 by mol) liposomes (LUVs) as a model system. Cholesterol (Ch or [¹⁴C]Ch) served as an in-situ peroxidation probe and protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) as photosensitizer. PpIX-sensitized lipid peroxidation was monitored by two analytical methods that we developed: HPLC-EC(Hg) and HPTLC-PI. 5α-hydroperoxy-Ch (5α-OOH) accumulated rapidly and linearly with irradiation time, indicating singlet oxygen (¹O₂) intermediacy. When ascorbate (AH^-) and trace lipophilic iron [Fe(HQ)₃] were included, 7α/7β-hydroperoxy-Ch (7-OOH) accumulated exponentially, indicating progressively greater membrane-damaging chain lipid peroxidation. With AH^-/Fe(HQ)₃ present, the NO donor SPNO had no effect on 5α-OOH formation, but dose-dependently inhibited 7-OOH formation due to NO interception of chain-carrying oxyl and peroxyl radicals. Similar results were obtained when cancer cells were PpIX/light-treated, using SPNO or activated macrophages as the NO source. These findings implicate chain lipid peroxidation in PDT-induced cytotoxicity and NO as a potent antagonist thereof by acting as a chain-breaking antioxidant. Thus, unless NO formation in aggressive tumors is suppressed, it can clearly compromise PDT efficacy.

Inhibition of IDO leads to IL-6-dependent systemic inflammation in mice when combined with photodynamic therapy

It was previously reported that the activation of antitumor immune response by photodynamic therapy (PDT) is crucial for its therapeutic outcome. Excessive PDT-mediated inflammation is accompanied by immunosuppressive mechanisms that protect tissues from destruction. Thus, the final effect of PDT strongly depends on the balance between the activation of an adoptive arm of immune response and a range of activated immunosuppressive mechanisms. Here, with flow cytometry and functional tests, we evaluate the immunosuppressive activity of tumor-associated myeloid cells after PDT. We investigate the antitumor potential of PDT combined with indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO) inhibitor in the murine 4T1 and E0771 orthotopic breast cancer models. We found that the expression of IDO, elevated after PDT, affects the polarization of T regulatory cells and influences the innate immune response. Our results indicate that, depending on a therapeutic scheme, overcoming IDO-induced immunosuppressive mechanisms after PDT can be beneficial or can lead to a systemic toxic reaction. The inhibition of IDO, shortly after PDT, activates IL-6-dependent toxic reactions that can be diminished by the use of anti-IL-6 antibodies. Our results emphasize that deeper investigation of the physiological role of IDO, an attractive target for immunotherapies of cancer, is of great importance.

Iron metabolic pathways in the processes of sponge plasticity

The ability to regulate oxygen consumption evolved in ancestral animals and is intrinsically linked to iron metabolism. The iron pathways have been intensively studied in mammals, whereas data on distant invertebrates are limited. Sea sponges represent the oldest animal phylum and have unique structural plasticity and capacity to reaggregate after complete dissociation. We studied iron metabolic factors and their expression during reaggregation in the White Sea cold-water sponges Halichondria panicea and Halisarca dujardini. De novo transcriptomes were assembled using RNA-Seq data, and evolutionary trends were analyzed with bioinformatic tools. Differential expression during reaggregation was studied for H. dujardini. Enzymes of the heme biosynthesis pathway and transport globins, neuroglobin (NGB) and androglobin (ADGB), were identified in sponges. The globins mutate at higher evolutionary rates than the heme synthesis enzymes. Highly conserved iron-regulatory protein 1 (IRP1) presumably interacts with the iron-responsive elements (IREs) found in mRNAs of ferritin (FTH1) and a putative transferrin receptor NAALAD2. The reaggregation process is accompanied by increased expression of IRP1, the antiapoptotic factor BCL2, the inflammation factor NFκB (p65), FTH1 and NGB, as well as by an increase in mitochondrial density. Our data indicate a complex mechanism of iron regulation in sponge structural plasticity and help to better understand general mechanisms of morphogenetic processes in multicellular species.

Multiple Functions Integrated inside a Single Molecule for Amplification of Photodynamic Therapy Activity

Nitric oxide (NO) can play both prosurvival and prodeath roles in photodynamic therapy (PDT). The generation efficiency of peroxynitrite anions (ONOO^-), by NO and superoxide anions (O₂^•-), significantly influenced the outcome. Reports indicated that such efficiency is closely related to the distance between NO and O₂^•-. Thus, in this manuscript, l-arginine (Arg) ethyl ester-modified zinc phthalocyanine (Arg-ZnPc) was designed and synthesized as a photosensitizer (PS) and NO donor. Post light irradiation, the guanido of Arg-ZnPc can be effectively oxidized by the generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the PDT process to release NO. Such a strategy could ensure O₂^•- and NO generation in the same place at the same time to guarantee effective ONOO^- formation. In addition, NO has other multiple synergistic cancer treatment functions, including tumor tissue vasodilatation for drug extravasation promotion, P-glycoprotein (P-gp) downregulation for drug efflux inhibition, and glutathione depletion for cancer cell endogenous antioxidant defense destruction. In vitro and in vivo results indicated that the effective ONOO^- formation and multiple functions of Arg-ZnPc could synergistically enhance its PDT activity and ensure satisfactory cancer treatment outcome.

Upregulation of pro-tumor nitric oxide by anti-tumor photodynamic therapy

Many malignant tumors use endogenous nitric oxide (NO) to promote survival, growth, and metastatic migration. This NO, which is typically generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), can also antagonize various anti-cancer therapies and its source is most often assumed to be constitutive or pre-existing iNOS. In this paper, we provide evidence (i) that many different cancer cells exhibit resistance to oxidative killing by photodynamic therapy (PDT), and (ii) that cells surviving the challenge grow, migrate and invade more aggressively, as do non-targeted bystander cells. Accompanying these effects are activation or upregulation of pro-survival/progression effector proteins such as NF-κB, Akt, and Survivin. Observed in the author's laboratory, these responses were not attributed to basal iNOS/NO in most cases, but rather to NO from enzyme that was strongly upregulated by photodynamic stress. Each of these effects and how they can be mitigated by inhibitors of iNOS activity or transcription, or by NO scavengers will be discussed. When approved for clinical use, such pharmacologic agents could improve PDT efficacy as well as reduce potentially negative side-effects of this therapy.

Nitric Oxide-Mediated Resistance to Antitumor Photodynamic Therapy

As an antitumor modality based on sensitizer photoexcitation by tumor-directed light, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has the advantage of being site-specific compared with conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Like these other therapies, however, PDT is often limited by pre-existing or acquired resistance. One type of resistance, discovered in the author's laboratory, involves nitric oxide (NO) generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in tumor cells. Using human breast, prostate and brain cancer cell lines, we have shown that iNOS is dramatically upregulated after a moderate PDT challenge sensitized by 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX. The elevated NO not only elicited a greater resistance to cell photokilling, but also an increase in the growth and migration/invasion rate of surviving cells. Greater iNOS/NO-based resistance was also demonstrated at the in vivo level using a breast tumor xenograft model. More recent studies have shown that NO from PDT-targeted cells can stimulate a progrowth/promigration response in non-targeted bystander cells. These novel effects of NO, their negative impact on PDT efficacy and possible mitigation thereof by anti-iNOS/NO pharmacologic agents will be discussed.

Bystander Effects of Nitric Oxide in Cellular Models of Anti-Tumor Photodynamic Therapy

Tumor cells exposed to stress-inducing radiotherapy or chemotherapy can send signals to non- or minimally exposed bystander cells. Bystander effects of ionizing radiation are well established, but little is known about such effects in non-ionizing photodynamic therapy (PDT). Our previous studies revealed that several cancer cell types upregulate inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and nitric oxide (NO) after a moderate 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based PDT challenge. The NO signaled for cell resistance to photokilling as well as greater growth, migration and invasion of surviving cells. Based on this work, we hypothesized that diffusible NO produced by PDT-targeted cells in a tumor might elicit pro-growth/migration responses in non-targeted bystander cells. In the present study, we tested this using a novel approach, in which ALA-PDT-targeted human cancer cells on culture dishes (prostate PC3, breast MDA-MB-231, glioma U87, or melanoma BLM) were initially segregated from non-targeted bystanders via impermeable silicone-rimmed rings. Several hours after LED irradiation, rings were removed, and both cell populations analyzed for various post-hν responses. For a moderate and uniform level of targeted cell killing by PDT (~25%), bystander proliferation and migration were both enhanced. Enhancement correlated with iNOS/NO upregulation in surviving targeted cells in the following order: PC3 > MDA-MB-231 > U87 > BLM. If occurring in an actual tumor PDT setting and not suppressed (e.g., by iNOS activity or transcription inhibitors), then such effects could compromise treatment efficacy or even stimulate disease progression if PDT's anti-tumor potency is not great enough.

In order for the light to shine so brightly, the darkness must be present-why do cancers fluoresce with 5-aminolaevulinic acid?

Photodynamic diagnosis and therapy have emerged as a promising tool in oncology. Using the visible fluorescence from photosensitisers excited by light, clinicians can both identify and treat tumour cells in situ. Protoporphyrin IX, produced in the penultimate step of the haem synthesis pathway, is a naturally occurring photosensitiser that visibly fluoresces when exposed to light. This fluorescence is enhanced considerably by the exogenous administration of the substrate 5-aminolaevulinic acid (5-ALA). Significantly, 5-ALA-induced protoporphyrin IX accumulates preferentially in cancer cells, and this enhanced fluorescence has been harnessed for the detection and photodynamic treatment of brain, skin and bladder tumours. However, surprisingly little is known about the mechanistic basis for this phenomenon. This review focuses on alterations in the haem pathway in cancer and considers the unique features of the cancer environment, such as altered glucose metabolism, oncogenic mutations and hypoxia, and their potential effects on the protoporphyrin IX phenomenon. A better understanding of why cancer cells fluoresce with 5-ALA would improve its use in cancer diagnostics and therapies.

Prognostic Value of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS) in Human Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is confirmed to regulate the production of nitric oxide (NO) when cells are exposed to external stimulus. Recent publications revealed that overexpression of iNOS predicted poor clinical outcomes for patients with malignant cancers, e.g., gastric, bladder, and colorectal cancers; however, several studies reported no obvious relationship between iNOS expression and prognosis of solid tumors. The aim of our study was to investigate the pooled effect of the prognostic value of iNOS expression.

Materials and Methods

We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases up to January 15, 2019. The concerned outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), cancer-special survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

Fourteen studies with 1,758 patients were included in this meta-analysis, and we reached the conclusion that increased iNOS expression was significantly associated with worse OS (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.57 - 2.28, p ≤ 0.001), worse CSS (HR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.88 - 5.20, p ≤ 0.001), and worse RFS (HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.29 - 3.62, p = 0.003) in solid tumors. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis identified the significant relationship of high iNOS expression with poor OS in gastric cancer. No obvious publication bias was detected by Begg's tests.

Conclusion

In summary, the results drawn in our meta-analysis demonstrated that elevated expression of iNOS had a significant association with poor survival in human cancer. iNOS might serve as a promising predictive biomarker of prognosis in cancer patients, and well-designed prospective studies are further needed to substantiate the prognostic value of iNOS.

Upstream signaling events leading to elevated production of pro-survival nitric oxide in photodynamically-challenged glioblastoma cells

Nitric oxide (NO) generated endogenously by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) promotes growth and migration/invasion of glioblastoma cells and also fosters resistance to chemotherapy and ionizing radiotherapy. Our recent studies revealed that glioblastoma cell iNOS/NO also opposes the cytotoxic effects of non-ionizing photodynamic therapy (PDT), and moreover stimulates growth/migration aggressiveness of surviving cells. These negative responses, which depended on PI3K/Akt/NF-κB activation, were strongly suppressed by blocking iNOS transcription with JQ1, a BET bromodomain inhibitor. In the present study, we sought to identify additional molecular events that precede iNOS transcriptional upregulation. Akt activation, iNOS induction, and viability loss in PDT-challenged glioblastoma U87 cells were all strongly inhibited by added l-histidine, consistent with primary involvement of photogenerated singlet oxygen (¹O₂). Transacetylase p300 not only underwent greater Akt-dependent activation after PDT, but greater interaction with NF-κB subunit p65, which in turn exhibited greater K310 acetylation. In addition, PDT promoted intramolecular disulfide formation and inactivation of tumor suppressor PTEN, thereby favoring Akt and p300 activation leading to iNOS upregulation. Importantly, deacetylase Sirt1 was down-regulated by PDT stress, consistent with the observed increase in p65-acK310 level, which fostered iNOS transcription. This study provides new mechanistic insights into how glioblastoma tumors can exploit iNOS/NO to not only resist PDT, but to attain a more aggressive survival phenotype.

Nitric Oxide Antagonism to Anti-Glioblastoma Photodynamic Therapy: Mitigation by Inhibitors of Nitric Oxide Generation

Many studies have shown that low flux nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in various tumors, including glioblastomas, can promote angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and migration/invasion. Minimally invasive, site-specific photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly promising anti-glioblastoma modality. Recent research in the authors' laboratory has revealed that iNOS-derived NO in glioblastoma cells elicits resistance to 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based PDT, and moreover endows PDT-surviving cells with greater proliferation and migration/invasion aggressiveness. In this contribution, we discuss iNOS/NO antagonism to glioblastoma PDT and how this can be overcome by judicious use of pharmacologic inhibitors of iNOS activity or transcription.

Gaseous signaling molecules and their application in resistant cancer treatment: from invisible to visible

Multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancer remains a critical obstacle for efficient chemotherapy. Many MDR reversal agents have been discovered but failed in clinical trials due to severe toxic effects. Gaseous signaling molecules (GSMs), such as oxygen, nitric oxide, hydrogen sulfide and carbon monoxide, play key roles in regulating cell biological function and MDR. Compared with other toxic chemosensitizing agents, GSMs are endogenous and biocompatible molecules with little side effects. Research show that GSM modulators, including pharmaceutical formulations of GSMs (combined with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs) and GSM-donors (small molecules with GSMs releasing property), can overcome or reverse MDR. This review discusses the roles of these four GSMs in modulating MDR, and summarizes GSMs modulators in treating cancers with drug resistance.

Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by 5-aminolevulinic Acid Promotes the Upregulation and Modifies the Intracellular Expression of Surveillance Proteins in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Expression of proteins related to cell surveillance has been described in tumors presenting resistance to photodynamic therapy (PDT). The aim of this study was to verify whether there was upregulation of proteins related to resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) after PDT. OSCC was chemically induced in rats and treated after one cycle of PDT mediated by 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA-PDT). Immunolabeling of p-NFκB, Bcl-2, survivin, iNOS, p-Akt, p-mTOR and cyclin D1 was performed after the treatment. There was increased expression of Bcl-2 (P = 0.008), iNOS (P = 0.020), p-Akt (P = 0.020) and p-mTOR (P = 0.010) by surviving neoplastic cells after PDT when compared to the control. In conclusion, after one cycle of 5-ALA-mediated PDT, Bcl-2, p-Akt, p-mTOR and iNOS were upregulated in neoplastic cells of OSCC, suggesting an activation of antiapoptosis and cell proliferation pathways. This fact must be considered in the establishment of PDT protocols for OSCC treatment, mainly those in which PDT will be combined with chemotherapy drugs targeted at the studied proteins.

Upregulation of nitric oxide in tumor cells as a negative adaptation to photodynamic therapy

One of the advantages of PDT is that it can often circumvent tumor resistance to chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin and doxorubicin. However, pre-existing and acquired resistance to PDT has also been demonstrated. One type of resistance, which involves nitric oxide (NO) generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in tumor cells, was discovered in the author's laboratory. When subjected to a 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based photodynamic challenge, several cancer lines, including breast, prostate, and glioma, underwent intrinsic apoptosis that could be substantially enhanced by iNOS enzymatic inhibitors or a NO scavenger, implying iNOS/NO-mediated resistance. In most cases, iNOS was significantly upregulated by the challenge and this appeared to be more important in the hyper-resistance than pre-existing enzyme. Of added importance was our observation that cells surviving ALA/light treatment typically exhibited a more aggressive phenotype, proliferating and migrating/invading more rapidly than controls in iNOS/NO-dependent fashion. Most of these in vitro PDT findings have recently been confirmed at the in vivo level, using a human breast tumor xenograft model. We have also shown that upregulated iNOS in PDT-targeted cells can elicit a pro-growth/migration response in non-targeted bystander cells, NO again playing a key role. Post-PDT resistance and potentially dangerous hyper-aggressiveness can be attenuated by inhibitors of iNOS enzymatic activity, some of which have seen pharmacologic use in non-cancer or PDT settings. These various aspects of PDT antagonism by tumor iNOS/NO and how they might be overcome will be discussed in this review. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:590-598, 2018.© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Nitric oxide antagonism to glioblastoma photodynamic therapy and mitigation thereof by BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1

Endogenous nitric oxide (NO) generated by inducible NO synthase (iNOS) promotes glioblastoma cell proliferation and invasion and also plays a key role in glioblastoma resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Non-ionizing photodynamic therapy (PDT) has anti-tumor advantages over conventional glioblastoma therapies. Our previous studies revealed that glioblastoma U87 cells up-regulate iNOS after a photodynamic challenge and that the resulting NO not only increases resistance to apoptosis but renders surviving cells more proliferative and invasive. These findings were largely based on the effects of inhibiting iNOS activity and scavenging NO. Demonstrating now that iNOS expression in photostressed U87 cells is mediated by NF-κB, we hypothesized that (i) recognition of acetylated lysine (acK) on NF-κB p65/RelA by bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) protein Brd4 is crucial; and (ii) by suppressing iNOS expression, a BET inhibitor (JQ1) would attenuate the negative effects of photostress. The following evidence was obtained. (i) Like iNOS, Brd4 protein and p65-acK levels increased severalfold in photostressed cells. (ii) JQ1 at minimally toxic concentrations had no effect on Brd4 or p65-acK up-regulation after PDT but strongly suppressed iNOS, survivin, and Bcl-xL up-regulation, along with the growth and invasion spurt of PDT-surviving cells. (iii) JQ1 inhibition of NO production in photostressed cells closely paralleled that of growth/invasion inhibition. (iv) Finally, at 1% the concentration of iNOS inhibitor 1400W, JQ1 reduced post-PDT cell aggressiveness to a far greater extent. This is the first evidence for BET inhibitor targeting of iNOS expression in cancer cells and how such targeting can markedly improve therapeutic efficacy.

Bystander effects of nitric oxide in anti-tumor photodynamic therapy

Ionizing radiation of specifically targeted cells in a given population is known to elicit pro-death or pro-survival responses in non-targeted bystander cells, which often make no physical contact with the targeted ones. We have recently demonstrated a similar phenomenon for non-ionizing photodynamic therapy (PDT), showing that prostate cancer cells subjected to targeted photodynamic stress stimulated growth and migration of non-stressed, non-contacting bystander cells. Diffusible nitric oxide (NO) generated by stress-upregulated inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was shown to play a dominant role in these responses. Moreover, target-derived NO stimulated iNOS/NO induction in bystanders, suggesting a NO-mediated feed-forward field effect driven by targeted cells surviving the photodynamic challenge. In this research highlight, we will review these findings and discuss their potential negative implications on clinical PDT outcomes and how these might be mitigated through pharmacologic use of select iNOS inhibitors.

Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide

Nitric oxide (NO) produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzymes is a free radical molecule involved in a wide variety of normophysiologic and pathophysiologic processes. Included in the latter category are cancer promotion, progression, and resistance to therapeutic intervention. Animal tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) studies several years ago revealed that endogenous NO can reduce PDT efficacy and that NOS inhibitors can alleviate this. Until relatively recently, little else was known about this anti-PDT effect of NO, including: (a) the underlying mechanisms; (b) type(s) of NOS involved; and (c) whether active NO was generated in vascular cells, tumor cells, or both. In addressing these questions for various cancer cell lines exposed to PDT-like conditions, the author's group has made several novel findings, including: (i) exogenous NO can scavenge lipid-derived free radicals arising from photostress, thereby protecting cells from membrane-damaging chain peroxidation; (ii) cancer cells can upregulate inducible NOS (iNOS) after a PDT-like challenge and the resulting NO can signal for resistance to photokilling; (iii) photostress-surviving cells with elevated iNOS/NO proliferate and migrate/invade more aggressively; and (iv) NO produced by photostress-targeted cells can induce greater aggressiveness in non-targeted bystander cells. In this article, the author briefly discusses these various means by which NO can interfere with PDT and how this may be mitigated by use of NOS inhibitors as PDT adjuvants.

Role of Endogenous Nitric Oxide in Hyperaggressiveness of Tumor Cells that Survive a Photodynamic Therapy Challenge

Many malignant tumors exploit nitric oxide (NO) for a survival, growth, and migration/invasion advantage, and also to withstand the cytotoxic effects of chemo- and radiotherapies. Endogenous NO has also been shown to antagonize photodynamic therapy (PDT), a unique minimally invasive modality involving a photosensitizing (PS) agent, PS-exciting light in the visible- to near-infrared range, and molecular oxygen. The anti-PDT effects of NO were discovered about 20 years ago, but the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. More recent studies in the author's laboratory using breast, prostate, and brain cancer cell lines have shown that inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) is dramatically upregulated after a PDT challenge using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA-) -induced protoporphyrin IX as the PS. The parallel increase in NO resulted not only in a greater resistance to cell killing but also in a striking increase in the growth and migration/invasion rate of surviving cells. These in vitro findings and their recent recapitulation at the in vivo level are discussed in this article, along with how iNOS/NO's negative effects on PDT can be attenuated by the use of select iNOS inhibitors as PDT adjuvants.