Latent memory facilitates relearning through molecular signaling mechanisms that are distinct from original learning

Forgotten memory storage and retrieval in Drosophila

Inaccessibility of stored memory in ensemble cells through the forgetting process causes animals to be unable to respond to natural recalling cues. While accumulating evidence has demonstrated that reactivating memory-stored cells can switch cells from an inaccessible state to an accessible form and lead to recall of previously learned information, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain elusive. The current study used Drosophila as a model to demonstrate that the memory of one-trial aversive olfactory conditioning, although inaccessible within a few hours after learning, is stored in KCαβ and retrievable after mild retraining. One-trial aversive conditioning triggers protein synthesis to form a long-lasting cellular memory trace, approximately 20 days, via creb in KCαβ, and a transient cellular memory trace, approximately one day, via orb in MBON-α3. PPL1-α3 negatively regulates forgotten one-trial conditioning memory retrieval. The current study demonstrated that KCαβ, PPL1-α3, and MBON-α3 collaboratively regulate the formation of forgotten one-cycle aversive conditioning memory formation and retrieval.

Protein synthesis inhibitor administration before a reminder caused recovery from amnesia induced by memory reconsolidation impairment with NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist

Memory recovery in amnestic animals is one of the most poorly studied processes. In this paper, we examine the role of protein synthesis and a reminder in the mechanisms of amnesia and memory recovery in grape snails trained to conditioned food aversion. Amnesia was induced by the impairment of memory reconsolidation using NMDA (N-methyl d-aspartate) glutamate receptor antagonists. In an early stage of amnesia (day 3), injections of protein synthesis inhibitors into animals combined with a reminder by a conditioned stimulus (CS) led to the recovery of aversive reactions to its presentation. Two types of changes in reactions to CS were revealed. In most animals, a persistent recovery of memory retrieval was found that lasted for at least 10 days. In other snails, aversive responses to CS persisted for 24 h. Isolated injections of inhibitors, injections of inhibitors and a reminder by the learning environment (without presenting a CS), usage of a differentiating stimulus instead of a CS, or inhibitor injections after the reminder did not affect the development of amnesia. The administration of protein synthesis inhibitors and a reminder in the late period after amnesia induction (10 days) did not affect its development or caused a short-term memory recovery. We suggest that amnesia is an active process that develops over time. The reminder induces the reactivation of the amnesia process dependent on protein synthesis, while the administration of protein synthesis inhibitors leads to the impairment of amnesia reactivation and recovery of the state formed before amnesia induction (i.e., recovery of conditioned food aversion memory).

Registered Report: Transcriptional Analysis of Savings Memory Suggests Forgetting is Due to Retrieval Failure

There is fundamental debate about the nature of forgetting: some have argued that it represents the decay of the memory trace, others that the memory trace persists but becomes inaccessible because of retrieval failure. These different accounts of forgetting lead to different predictions about savings memory, the rapid re-learning of seemingly forgotten information. If forgetting is because of decay, then savings requires re-encoding and should thus involve the same mechanisms as initial learning. If forgetting is because of retrieval failure, then savings should be mechanistically distinct from encoding. In this registered report, we conducted a preregistered and rigorous test between these accounts of forgetting. Specifically, we used microarray to characterize the transcriptional correlates of a new memory (1 d after training), a forgotten memory (8 d after training), and a savings memory (8 d after training but with a reminder on day 7 to evoke a long-term savings memory) for sensitization in Aplysia californica (n = 8 samples/group). We found that the reactivation of sensitization during savings does not involve a substantial transcriptional response. Thus, savings is transcriptionally distinct relative to a newer (1-d-old) memory, with no coregulated transcripts, negligible similarity in regulation-ranked ordering of transcripts, and a negligible correlation in training-induced changes in gene expression (r = 0.04 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.12, 0.20]). Overall, our results suggest that forgetting of sensitization memory represents retrieval failure.

Administration of Protein Synthesis Inhibitor before Reminder Reverses Amnesia Induced by Memory Reconsolidation Impairment with 5-HT Receptors Antagonist

Administration of 5-HT receptor antagonist to snails trained in conditioned food aversion prior to reminding of the conditioning stimulus caused amnesia. At the early period of amnesia (day 3), injections of protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide without reminder or reminder alone were ineffective. At the same time, injections of the inhibitor combined with reminder led to memory recovery; this effect in most animals persisted for at least 10 days. In the rest snails, aversive responses to presentations of the conditioning stimulus persisted for 2 days. Cycloheximide injection and reminder in 10 days after induction of amnesia did not affect its development or caused a transient memory recovery (2 days). We hypothesized that amnesia is an active process unfolding in time. One of mechanism of this process is reminder-induced and protein synthesis-depended reactivation of amnesia. Inhibitor of protein synthesis disturbed this reactivation and led to recovery of the initial memory of conditioned food aversion.

Protein synthesis inhibitors induce both memory impairment and its recovery

The involvement of protein synthesis in the mechanisms of conditioned food aversion memory impairment and recovery in grape snails was studied. It was found that protein synthesis inhibitor (cycloheximide) injections before a reminder by the conditioned stimulus (CS) caused amnesia development. Three days after amnesia induction, injections of cycloheximide or another protein synthesis inhibitor, anisomycin, combined with a reminder by four CSs resulted in memory retrieval, which was saved for 24 h. Cycloheximide injections and the administration of one CS as a reminder to an amnestic animals caused the memory expression only in response to this CS, while it was absent the next day. The isolated administration of a reminder or inhibitor injections without a reminder was not effective. It is suggested that amnesia is an active process and that one of its mechanisms may be a protein-dependent amnesia reactivation caused by a reminder. The administration of protein synthesis inhibitors led to impairment of amnesia reactivation and to recovery of the state formed before amnesia induction and thus to the recovery of conditioned food aversion memory.

Transcriptional changes before and after forgetting of a long-term sensitization memory in Aplysia californica

Most long-term memories are forgotten, becoming progressively less likely to be recalled. Still, some memory fragments may persist, as savings memory (easier relearning) can be detected long after recall has become impossible. What happens to a memory trace during forgetting that makes it inaccessible for recall and yet still effective to spark easier re-learning? We are addressing this question by tracking the transcriptional changes that accompany learning and then forgetting of a long-term sensitization memory in the tail-elicited siphon withdrawal reflex of Aplysia californica. First, we tracked savings memory. We found that even though recall of sensitization fades completely within 1 week of training, savings memory is still detectable at 2 weeks post training. Next, we tracked the time-course of regulation of 11 transcripts we previously identified as potentially being regulated after recall has become impossible. Remarkably, 3 transcripts still show strong regulation 2 weeks after training and an additional 4 are regulated for at least 1 week. These long-lasting changes in gene expression always begin early in the memory process, within 1 day of training. We present a synthesis of our results tracking gene expression changes accompanying sensitization and provide a testable model of how sensitization memory is forgotten.

Transforming growth factor β recruits persistent MAPK signaling to regulate long-term memory consolidation in Aplysia californica

In this study, we explore the mechanistic relationship between growth factor signaling and kinase activity that supports the protein synthesis-dependent phase of long-term memory (LTM) consolidation for sensitization of Aplysia. Specifically, we examine LTM for tail shock-induced sensitization of the tail-elicited siphon withdrawal (T-SW) reflex, a form of memory that requires both (i) extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2; MAPK) activity within identified sensory neurons (SNs) that mediate the T-SW and (ii) the activation of transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling. We now report that repeated tail shocks that induce intermediate-term (ITM) and LTM for sensitization, also induce a sustained post-training phase of MAPK activity in SNs (lasting at least 1 h). We identified two mechanistically distinct phases of post-training MAPK: (i) an immediate phase that does not require ongoing protein synthesis or TGFβ signaling, and (ii) a sustained phase that requires both protein synthesis and extracellular TGFβ signaling. We find that LTM consolidation requires sustained MAPK, and is disrupted by inhibitors of protein synthesis and TGFβ signaling during the consolidation window. These results provide strong evidence that TGFβ signaling sustains MAPK activity as an essential mechanistic step for LTM consolidation.

Regulation mechanism of peptides derived from sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicas) for modulation of learning and memory

Peptides derived from the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicas have immunomodulatory and antioxidant activities. Three dosage levels of peptide hydrolysates were fed to Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice. Standardized Y and Morris water mazes were used to determine the effects of A. japonicas peptides on learning and memory. All 3 mouse test groups showed reductions in the latency period (LP), the number of times that a mouse swam over the location of a platform (NCP), the ratio of the distance from a target quadrant to the total swimming distance (DTQ), and the time spent in the target quadrant (TTQ). Microarray analysis was then carried out and 308 genes were differentially expressed between groups, of which 235 were up and 73 were down regulated in the brains of test group animals, compared with control group animals. Expressions of genes identified in microarrays were then analyzed using qRT-PCR.