Transcriptional changes before and after forgetting of a long-term sensitization memory in Aplysia californica

Evidence of Active-Forgetting Mechanisms? Blocking Arachidonic Acid Release May Slow Forgetting of Sensitization in Aplysia

Long-term sensitization in Aplysia is accompanied by a persistent up-regulation of mRNA encoding the peptide neurotransmitter Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-amide (FMRFa), a neuromodulator that opposes the expression of sensitization through activation of the arachidonic acid second-messenger pathway. We completed a preregistered test of the hypothesis that FMRFa plays a critical role in the forgetting of sensitization. Aplysia received long-term sensitization training and were then given whole-body injections of vehicle (N = 27), FMRFa (N = 26), or 4-bromophenacylbromide (4-BPB; N = 31), a phospholipase inhibitor that prevents the release of arachidonic acid. FMRFa produced no changes in forgetting. 4-BPB decreased forgetting measured 6 d after training [d s = 0.55 95% CI(0.01, 1.09)], though the estimated effect size is uncertain. Our results provide preliminary evidence that forgetting of sensitization may be a regulated, active process in Aplysia, but could also indicate a role for arachidonic acid in stabilizing the induction of sensitization.

Dopamine-based mechanism for transient forgetting

Active forgetting is an essential component of the brain’s memory management system¹. Forgetting can be permanent, in which prior memory is lost completely; or transient, in which memory exists in a temporary state of impaired retrieval. Such temporary blocks on memory seem universal, and can disrupt an individual’s plans, social interactions, and ability to make rapid, flexible and appropriate choices. However, the neurobiological mechanisms that cause transient forgetting are unknown. Here we identify a single dopamine neuron in Drosophila that mediates memory suppression resulting in transient forgetting. Artificially activating this neuron failed to abolish the expression of long-term memory. Rather, it briefly suppressed memory retrieval, with memory becoming accessible with time. The dopamine neuron modulates memory retrieval by stimulating a unique dopamine receptor expressed in a restricted physical compartment of the axons of mushroom body neurons. This mechanism for transient forgetting is triggered by interfering stimuli presented just prior to retrieval.

Registered Report: Transcriptional Analysis of Savings Memory Suggests Forgetting is Due to Retrieval Failure

There is fundamental debate about the nature of forgetting: some have argued that it represents the decay of the memory trace, others that the memory trace persists but becomes inaccessible because of retrieval failure. These different accounts of forgetting lead to different predictions about savings memory, the rapid re-learning of seemingly forgotten information. If forgetting is because of decay, then savings requires re-encoding and should thus involve the same mechanisms as initial learning. If forgetting is because of retrieval failure, then savings should be mechanistically distinct from encoding. In this registered report, we conducted a preregistered and rigorous test between these accounts of forgetting. Specifically, we used microarray to characterize the transcriptional correlates of a new memory (1 d after training), a forgotten memory (8 d after training), and a savings memory (8 d after training but with a reminder on day 7 to evoke a long-term savings memory) for sensitization in Aplysia californica (n = 8 samples/group). We found that the reactivation of sensitization during savings does not involve a substantial transcriptional response. Thus, savings is transcriptionally distinct relative to a newer (1-d-old) memory, with no coregulated transcripts, negligible similarity in regulation-ranked ordering of transcripts, and a negligible correlation in training-induced changes in gene expression (r = 0.04 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.12, 0.20]). Overall, our results suggest that forgetting of sensitization memory represents retrieval failure.