Changes in walking velocity and stride parameters with age in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Gait Pattern in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A According to Disease Severity

The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of gait patterns in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A) patients according to disease severity. Twenty-two CMT1A patients were enrolled and classified into two groups, according to the disease severity. The healthy control group consisted of 22 subjects with no gait impairment. Full barefoot three-dimensional gait analysis with temporospatial, kinematic, and kinetic data was performed among the mild and moderate CMT1A group and the control group. Minimal hip abduction, maximal hip extension generation, peak knee flexion moment at stance, ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact, maximal ankle plantarflexion at push-off and maximal ankle rotation moment at stance in the CMT1A group showed a significant difference compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In the moderate group, there were greater maximal hip flexion angles in swing, and smaller dorsiflexion angles at initial contact compared to the control group and mild group. CMT patients had typical gait characteristics and their gait patterns were different according to severity. The analysis of gait patterns in patients with CMT1A will help to understand gait function and provide important information for the treatment of patients with CMT in the future.

Natural history of ankle function during gait in youth with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease types 1 and 2

BACKGROUND

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) can cause progressive muscle weakness and contracture, leading to gait abnormalities such as increased and delayed peak ankle dorsiflexion and reduced ankle power generation in terminal stance. Understanding strength loss on ankle function during gait is important for interpreting treatment outcomes and evaluating new therapies designed to improve gait.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do ankle kinematics and kinetics vary as a function of age, disease progression with associated loss of muscle strength and CMT type in youth with CMT types 1 and 2?

METHODS

A prospective convenience sample of 45 participants with CMT1 and 2, ages 7-22 years, underwent comprehensive gait analysis. Seventeen patients underwent repeat analyses totaling 67 tests. Generalized mixed effects linear modeling was used to compare CMT1 versus CMT2 and to examine the effects of age on ankle strength, range of motion, kinematics, and kinetics within each CMT type.

RESULTS

Plantarflexor and dorsiflexor strength were less in CMT2 compared with CMT1 (p ≤ 0.05), while peak dorsiflexion in terminal stance (TST) was greater (p = 0.02). Peak plantarflexion moment and power generation were also less in CMT2 (p ≤ 0.02). In CMT1, peak dorsiflexion in TST increased with age through 13 years (p = 0.004); then plateaued in the normal range (p = 0.73). Peak ankle angle in mid-swing was closely related to the angle in TST (p < 0.001) following a similar pattern with age. In CMT2, no significant associations were observed between age, peak dorsiflexion in TST, and peak ankle angle in mid-swing (p ≥ 0.19). There were no consistent trends with age for individual patients with repeat tests.

SIGNIFICANCE

The heterogeneity of joint level impairments and gait kinematics and kinetics point to the importance of having an in-depth understanding of gait at the individual patient level using comprehensive gait analysis including valid and reliable strength measures.

Stance and swing phase ankle phenotypes in youth with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1: An evaluation using comprehensive gait analysis techniques

BACKGROUND

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) results in muscle weakness and contracture leading to a wide variety of gait issues including atypical ankle kinematics in both stance and swing. Knowledge of the stance and swing phase kinematic patterns for CMT type 1 (CMT1), the most common CMT type, will improve our understanding of expected gait outcomes and treatment needs to improve gait function.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the stance/swing phase ankle phenotypes in CMT1?

METHODS

A prospective convenience sample of 25 participants with CMT1, ages 7-19 years, underwent comprehensive gait analysis following standard procedures. Ankle phenotypes based on peak ankle dorsiflexion in terminal stance and mid-swing were defined and compared using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Patients with CMT1 presented with three stance phase ankle phenotypes: 21 limbs (42 %) with reduced (mean 5°, SD 2°), 19 limbs (38 %) with typical (mean 11°, SD 1°) and 10 limbs (20 %) with excessive (mean 15°, SD 2°) peak dorsiflexion in terminal stance (p < 0.05). There were two swing phase phenotypes: 19 limbs (38 %) with typical (mean -1.7°, SD 1.5°) and 31 limbs (62 %) with excessive (mean -5.6°, SD 1.4°) plantarflexion in mid-swing (p < 0.002). Eleven patients (44 %) had ankles that were classified into different stance groups, and 9 patients (36 %) had ankles that were classified into different swing groups. The most common combination of stance/swing ankle phenotypes was decreased dorsiflexion in terminal stance with increased plantarflexion in mid-swing (16 sides, 32 %).

SIGNIFICANCE

This study shows that youth with CMT1 have multiple combinations of combined ankle kinematics for stance and swing. The ankle phenotypes identified in this study reflect contributions of both dorsi/plantarflexor weakness and plantarflexor contracture, which require different treatment approaches. Comprehensive gait analysis can distinguish between multiple ankle phenotypes to assist in determining the most appropriate treatment to improve gait for individual patients.

Counter-movement jump characteristics in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1a disease

BACKGROUND

Poor performance in sports, especially activities that require explosive movements, is a common reason for initial presentation of children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1a (CMT1a) to the paediatric neuromuscular specialist.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aim of this descriptive, retrospective study was to analyse counter-movement jump characteristics in children with CMT1a in comparison to those in typically developing children (TDC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included seven patients with CMT1a and 44 TDC from our data pool. All the participants performed counter-movement jumps, and jump height, peak force, time to peak force, average and peak rate of force development and net vertical impulse were then calculated. For statistical comparison by means of an independent Student's t-test, children with CMT1a were compared to seven sex- and age-matched TDC. Correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship between the force-time variables and jump height.

RESULTS

Peak force, net vertical impulse and jump height values in the CMT1a group were significantly lower than those in the TDC group. There were no between-group differences in the time to peak force or average and peak rate of force development. In terms of task symmetry, the correlation between the time-force curve of the left and right leg in the CMT1a group was reduced as compared with that in the TDC group. In both groups, among the parameters measured, there was a significant correlation between jump height and net vertical impulse.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study showed that reduced jump performance in children with CMT1a, as demonstrated by decreased counter-movement jump height, was due to a reduced net impulse during this explosive movement task. This finding is critical for children with CMT1a and has to be considered in clinical management and activities of daily living (e.g. sports lessons in school).