Effects of long-term continuous use of immune-enhancing enteral formula on nutritional and immunologic status in non-surgical patients

Effect of Postoperative ω-3 Fatty Acid Immunonutritional Therapy on NK Cell Gene Methylation in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the effect of ω-3 fatty acid immunonutritional therapy on natural killer (NK) cell gene methylation and function in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 70 cases of elderly patients with gastric cancer were randomized into the ω-3 fatty acid group and placebo group, according to the type of nutritional support administered. The methylation status of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α gene promoter in peripheral NK cells was detected by methylation specific polymerase chain reaction, and the TNF-α level in peripheral NK cells was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

After 14 days of immunonutritional therapy with ω-3 fatty acid or placebo, patients in the ω-3 group had significantly higher average NK cell activity (0.27 vs. 0.24, P=0.013) and lower percentages of TNF-α gene promoter methylation (25.7% vs. 60%, P<0.05) than the placebo group. However, there were no significant differences in the concentration of albumin, prealbumin and TNF-α in serum, and the NK cell count between the ω-3 group and placebo group.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative application of ω-3 fatty acid may improve the activity of NK cells, which is correlated to the methylation status of the TNF-α gene promoter.

Response to nutritional support and therapeutic approaches of amino acid and protein metabolism in surgical patients

The response to critical illness involves alterations in all aspects of metabolic control, favoring catabolism of body protein. In particular, body protein loss occurring as a result of the alteration of protein metabolism has been reported to be inversely correlated with the survival of critically ill patients. Despite the availability of various therapeutic modalities aiming to prevent loss of the body protein pool, such as total parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition designed to provide excessive calories as a form of energy substrate, and protein itself, the loss of body protein cannot be prevented by any of these. Loss of the boyd protein store occurs as a consequence of the alteration of the intermediate metabolism that works for the production of energy substrate. This alteration of substrate metabolism may be linked to the alteration of protein metabolism. However, no specific factors regulating amino acid and protein metabolism have been identified. Thus, further investigations evaluating amino acid and protein metabolism are required to obtain better understanding of metabolic regulation in the body, which may lead to the development of novel and more effective therapeutic modalities for nutrition in the future.

Compliance with and effects of preoperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This study was conducted to ascertain the feasibility and effectiveness of preoperative enteral immunonutrition using an immune-enhanced formula (Impact) in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients undergoing an elective pancreaticoduodenectomy were asked to ingest Impact for 5 days (750 mL/day) prior to surgery in addition to their normal diets. We retrospectively compared the early postoperative outcomes of the Impact group (n = 18), which consisted of patients who fully complied with the study protocol, and a control group (n = 13), which consisted of patients who had not ingested Impact prior to surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 82.6% of the patients complied with the preoperative oral ingestion of Impact; all but four patients tolerated a daily intake of 750 mL. While the clinical backgrounds of the Impact and control groups were not significantly different, the frequency of incisional wound infection was lower (0 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.012) and the change in systemic severity as evaluated using the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE)-II scoring system was milder (p = 0.033) in the Impact group than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The preoperative oral ingestion of Impact was well tolerated and appeared to be effective for preventing incisional wound infection and reducing the response to surgical stress in patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

The role of nucleotides in the immune and gastrointestinal systems: potential clinical applications

Nucleotides are low molecular weight biological molecules key to biochemical processes. Sources include de novo synthesis, recovery via salvage mechanisms, and dietary intakes. Although endogenous production serves as the main nucleotide source, evidence suggests that exogenous sources are essential to immune competence, intestinal development, and recovery. Dietary nucleotides serve a marked role in rapidly proliferating cells where they are necessary for optimal function. Accordingly, dietary nucleotides are deemed conditionally essential in the presence of various physiological stresses, including growth and development, recovery from injury, infection, and certain disease states. Clinical studies that evaluated nutrition formulations of nucleotides in combination with other specific nutrient substances demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in patients characterized as critically ill, injured, immune suppressed, or with chronic gastrointestinal conditions. However, conclusions regarding specific benefits of nucleotides are limited. Scientific substantiation of nucleotide supplementation in infant formula has been reported to improve the maturation and development of the intestinal tract as well as immune function. All medical nutrition products except for one immune-modulating formulation are devoid of nucleotides. In an effort to build on this, the current review presents the data to support potential clinical applications for nucleotides in enteral nutrition that may contribute to improved outcomes in physiologically stressed patients.

Randomized clinical trial of intravenous soybean oil alone versus soybean oil plus fish oil emulsion after gastrointestinal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Specific immunonutrients may reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and shorten recovery time. This randomized trial evaluated the clinical efficacy of a fish oil emulsion on outcome and immune function after gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

METHODS

A total of 206 patients with gastrointestinal or colonic cancer were randomized to receive isocaloric and isonitrogenous intravenous infusions of either soybean oil alone (1.2 g per kg bodyweight per day; control group, 103 analysed) or soybean plus fish oil emulsion (1.0 and 0.2 g per kg per day respectively; treatment group, 100 analysed) over 20-24 h daily for 7 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Baseline data were comparable in the two groups. There were fewer infectious complications (four versus 12 on day 8; P = 0.066), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was significantly less common (four versus 13; P = 0.039) and hospital stay was significantly shorter (mean(s.d.) 15(5) versus 17(8) days; P = 0.041) in the treatment group. Total postoperative medical costs were comparable in the two groups (mean(s.d.) US $ 1269(254) and 1302(324) in treatment and control groups respectively; P = 0.424). The median (interquartile range) difference in CD4/CD8 between days 1 and 8 after surgery was + 0.30 (0.06 to 0.79) in patients receiving fish oil and + 0.20 (-0.19 to 0.55) in controls (P = 0.021). No severe adverse events occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

Fish oil emulsion-supplemented parenteral nutrition significantly reduced SIRS and length of hospital stay. These clinical benefits may be related to normalization of cellular immune functions and modulation of the inflammatory response.

Effect of preoperative immunonutrition and other nutrition models on cellular immune parameters

AIM: To evaluate the effects of preoperative immunonutrition and other nutrition models on the cellular immunity parameters of patients with gastrointestinal tumors before surgical intervention. In addition, effects on postoperative complications were examined.

METHODS: Patients with gastrointestinal tumors were randomized into 3 groups. The immunonutrition group received a combination of arginine, fatty acids and nucleotides. The second and third group received normal nutrition and standard enteral nutrition, respectively. Nutrition protocols were administered for 7 d prior to the operation. Nutritional parameters, in particular prealbumin levels and lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4+, CD8+, CD16+/56+, and CD69 cells) were evaluated before and after the nutrition protocols. Groups were compared in terms of postoperative complications and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS: Of the 42 patients who completed the study, 16 received immunonutrition, 13 received normal nutrition and 13 received standard enteral nutrition. prealbumin values were low in every group, but this parameter was improved after the nutritional protocol only in the immunonutrition group (13.64 ± 8.83 vs 15.98 ± 8.66, P = 0.037). Groups were similar in terms of CD4+, CD16+/56, and CD69+ prior to the nutritional protocol; whereas CD8+ was higher in the standard nutrition group compared to the immunonutrition group. After nutritional protocols, none of the groups had an increase in their lymphocyte subpopulations. Also, groups did not differ in terms of postoperative complications and postoperative durations of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION: Preoperative immunonutrition provided a significant increase in prealbumin levels, while it did not significantly alter T lymphocyte subpopulation counts, the rate of postoperative complications and the duration of hospital stay.

Enteral feeding

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Enteral nutrition is a widely used therapy for nutritional treatment of patients with multiple pathologies. The present review selects important evidenced-based papers from 2006 and 2007 and critically reviews them for the reader.

RECENT FINDINGS

Use of synbiotics and probiotics is gaining acceptance. Supplements such as glutamine may be important for wound healing. Enteral feeding in malnourished patients may result in rapid growth of gut mucosal protein. Antibiotics are important for reduction of postpercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy infections. Early enteral nutrition in burn patients blunts the hypermetabolic response. Polymeric enteral formulations in vitro have a direct anti-inflammatory effect on enterocytes. Enteral nutrition, however, does not appear better than steroid use for induction of remission in Crohn's disease. Long-term (12-week) infusion of immune-enhancing enteral formulas in a nonsurgical patient group is well tolerated and safe. Finally, large reviews of enteral nutrition and their efficacy for specific disease states continue to demonstrate the difficulty in interpreting multiple small clinical studies.

SUMMARY

Enteral nutrition continues as a highly used medical therapy, usually as an adjuvant for other pharmacologic and supportive therapies. Multiple small clinical trials, observational studies and retrospective reviews must be analyzed to develop 'best practice' guidelines with enteral nutrition.

Clinical Significance of Perioperative Immunonutrition for Patients with Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that preoperative and/or postoperative enteral immune-enhanced formulas that are supplemented with arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA may reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Forty patients who underwent esophagectomy were divided into three groups: group A (n = 20) received a control enteral diet (Erental) through the jejunostomy after surgery. group B (n = 6) received an enteral diet supplemented with immune-enhancing substrates (Impact) containing arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA after surgery. group C (n = 14) received the impact before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Lymphocyte counts in group C on postoperative day (POD) 7 were somewhat higher than that in group A (p = 0.07) and significantly higher than in group B (p = 0.03). Furthermore the incidence of incisional wound infection in group C was significantly lower than that in group A (p = 0.03). Moreover, the duration of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was significantly shorter in group C than in group A (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that the perioperative immune-enhanced formula may be superior to postoperative control enteral formulas in terms of reducing surgical wound infection and postoperative SIRS, which may result in serious postoperative complications for patients who have undergone esophagectomy.

Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effects of Perioperative Use of Immune-enhancing Enteral Formula on Metabolic and Immunological Status in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Although perioperative immune-enhancing enteral formula (IEEF) is effective to decrease the rate of infectious complications, it is not clear whether perioperative use of IEEF decreases the incidence of postoperative complications and improves clinical outcome in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed to examine the effects of perioperative IEEF on nutritional and immunological status in patients with esophageal carcinoma who have been treated with esophagectomy.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, each receiving 3 days of preoperative and postoperative enteral nutrition through jejunostomy started within 24 h after operation, either with immune-enhancing enteral formula (group IEEF, n = 16) or with regular polymeric enteral formula (group C, n = 14). Preoperative and postoperative nutritional and immunological parameters and clinical outcome were examined.

RESULTS

A significant increase in the serum concentration of ornithine was noted in group IEEF and it peaked at 5 days after surgery. The equivalent values were significantly lower in group C. There was no difference in serum dochosahexaic acid between the two groups. The n-3/n-6 fatty acid ratio in group IEEF was significantly higher than in group C at 7 days after surgery. Peripheral percent lymphocyte fraction and total lymphocyte count in group IEEF were both significantly higher than those in group C. While T cell fraction of peripheral lymphocytes in group IEEF at 3 days after surgery, B cell fraction in group IEEF at 5 and 7 days after surgery was significantly higher than those in group C, suggesting that perioperative IEEF caused a shift towards B cell proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative use of IEEF caused a significant increase in the total lymphocyte count at 3 and 5 days after operation and caused a shift toward B cell proliferation, which may possibly be beneficial to decrease the incidence of postoperative infectious complications.