Evaluation and treatment of failed ulnar nerve release at the elbow

Optimizing Outcomes in Revision Peripheral Nerve Surgery of the Upper Extremity

Peripheral nerve surgeries for compressive neuropathy in the upper extremity are generally successful. However, cases that either fail or have complications requiring revision surgery are challenging. During revision consideration, surgeons should perform a comprehensive preoperative workup to understand the etiology of the patient's symptoms and categorize symptoms as persistent, recurrent, or new in relation to the index procedure. Revision surgery often requires an open, extensile approach with additional procedures to optimize outcomes. Even with proper workup and treatment, clinical outcomes of revision surgeries are inferior compared to primary surgeries and patients should be well informed prior to undergoing such procedures.

Revision surgery for recurrent ulnar nerve compression following failed subcutaneous transposition

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ulnar nerve compression after primary anterior subcutaneous transposition is relatively rare, and revision surgery is challenging. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of revision anterior subcutaneous transposition for recurrent ulnar nerve compression.

METHODS

Eight patients who underwent revision anterior subcutaneous transposition for recurrent ulnar nerve compression were enrolled in this study. The outcomes were based on preoperative and postoperative symptoms, physical examination findings, and electromyographic evaluation.

RESULTS

Ulnar nerve enlargement was preoperatively found in all patients with a mean cross sectional area of 0.15 cm2 (range, 0.14-0.18 cm2). Intraoperative findings showed that recurrent compression occurred in three areas, including the medial intermuscular septum (n = 5), the medial epicondyle (n = 6) and nerve entrance to forearm fascia (n = 1). Post-operation, significant improvements were observed in ring/little finger numbness (from severe to mild, p = 0.031), grip strength (from 48.00% to 80.38% of the intact side, p < 0.001) and McGowan grade (from Grade III to Grade I, p = 0.049). Postoperative electromyography test also showed significant improvement in motor nerve conduction at elbow (velocity, 23.30 ± 9.598 vs. 35.30 ± 9.367, p = 0.012; amplitude, 3.40 ± 3.703 vs. 5.65 ± 2.056, p = 0.007) and sensory nerve conduction at wrist (velocity, 27.04 ± 22.450 vs. 36.45 ± 18.099, p = 0.139; amplitude, 1.44 ± 1.600 vs. 4.00 ± 2.642, p = 0.011). Seven of the eight patients reported satisfaction with the postoperative results.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision anterior subcutaneous transposition was an effective treatment for recurrent ulnar nerve compression from prior failed procedures.

State of the art review. Upper extremity revision nerve compression surgery

Although surgical release of upper extremity nerve compression syndromes is highly effective, persistence or recurrence of symptoms and signs may occur. Thorough investigation is necessary in this situation before treatment is recommended. If the symptoms cannot be explained by other pathology than compression of the affected nerve and if conservative management has not provided improvement, reoperation may be considered. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic and surgical considerations in the revision of carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome and thoracic outlet syndrome.Level of evidence: V.

Recurrence of ulnar tunnel syndrome: Long-term clinical and functional results of surgical management using revision neurolysis and subcutaneous anterior transposition

OBJECTIVE

Recurrence after primary ulnar tunnel syndrome surgery is observed in 1.4%-25% of patients. However, the outcome of revision surgery is uncertain and limited. This study aimed to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of neurolysis combined with anterior subcutaneous transposition in cases of recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included patients who were operated on for iterative ulnar tunnel syndrome at the elbow between January 1996 and December 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Demographic data, pre- and post-operative clinical evaluations, surgical details, and satisfaction levels were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 11.7 years (range, 2.1-26.4 years). The secondary procedure led to significant improvement in mean Quick-DASH score, from 25.3 (range, 11-50) to 20.0 (range, 11-49) (p = 0.023), with a satisfaction rate of 78.5%. Symptoms of pain (p = 0.033), amyotrophy (p = 0.013), hypoesthesia (p < 0.01), and paresthesia (p < 0.001) also showed significant improvement. There were 7 cases of failure (25.0%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of neurolysis and anterior subcutaneous transposition was a reliable technique, improving clinical outcome in recurrent ulnar tunnel syndrome after previous surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV - retrospective study.

Evaluation of Different Surgical Techniques for Revision Cubital Tunnel Release: A Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Symptoms

PURPOSE

Controversy exists regarding the best option for revision surgery in refractory cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of revision surgery and determine the optimal surgical approach for patients requiring revision surgery for CuTS.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted. Characteristics of the included studies were summarized descriptively. The risk ratio between patient-reported preoperative and postoperative outcomes relating to pain, motor, and sensory deficits was calculated. A meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the postoperative symptom improvements based on the type of secondary surgery. Random-effects meta-analysis and descriptive statistics were used when appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 471 patients were evaluated in 20 studies. In total, 254 (53.9%) male and 217 (46.1%) female patients, with an average age of 49.2 ± 14.1 years, were included in this study. Pain was the most common symptom (n = 346, 81.6%), followed by sensory and motor dysfunction in 342 (80.6%) and 223 (52.6%) patients, respectively. Meta-analysis comparing preoperative and postoperative symptoms between patients who had submuscular transposition (SMT), subcutaneous transposition (SCT), and neurolysis showed that a significant subgroup difference exists between the types of revision surgery in sensory and motor improvements. Meta-regression showed that SMT was associated with better outcomes compared with SCT in motor and sensory improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision surgery for CuTS can be useful for addressing recurrent and persistent symptoms. Compared with neurolysis and SCT, SMT seems to be the superior option for revision surgery, demonstrating substantial improvement in all symptom domains.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Comparison of in-situ release and submuscular anterior transposition of ulnar nerve for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome, previously treated with subfascial anterior transfer-A retrospective study of 24 cases

BACKGROUND

Although cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common type of compressive neuropathy in the upper extremities, the indication and optimal surgical method for recurrent or refractory cubital tunnel syndrome remains controversial. This study evaluates the functional outcomes of revision surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome.

MATERIAL & METHODS

This study was a retrospective observational multicenter single-institution study including 660 patients who underwent surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome from 2010 to 2019. Among the 660 patients, 42(6.4%) received revision surgery due to remaining or recurrent symptoms confirmed with electromyography(EMG). After excluding those with concurrent elbow fracture, dislocation, osteoarthritis and wound infection, a total of 24 patients were included in the study. The patients were evaluated of disease severity, revision surgical method, time interval to recurrence, underlying diseases and postoperative functional outcomes.

RESULTS

All patients received ulnar nerve subfascial anterior transposition for the initial cubital tunnel syndrome surgery. Among the 24 patients (3.7%) who received revision surgery, nine received in situ neurolysis, 12 received submuscular transposition, and three received subcutaneous transfer. 21 patients (88%) reported improved mean VAS score of 4.3, while three patients complained of remaining symptoms that did not improve even after revision surgery. The patients with remaining symptoms all had underlying diabetes mellitus and were treated with subcutaneous transfer. The difference of surgical outcomes between the in situ neurolysis group and the nerve transfer groups were non-significant (p = 0.23). The most common cause of recurrent or persistent symptoms was adhesion and fibrosis at sling area. The mean follow up period before revision surgery was 26.3 months and postoperative follow up period after revision surgery was 8.5 months.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of this study imply that in-situ neurolysis may be as effective as anterior submuscular transfer of ulnar nerve for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome after anterior subfascial transfer.

Identifying Risk Factors for Recurrence After Cubital Tunnel Release

PURPOSE

This study investigated specific risk factors for recurrent surgery of ulnar nerve entrapment (ie, ipsilateral clinical symptoms within 5 years after initial cubital tunnel release [CuTR]) in a large cohort. We hypothesized that recurrence is associated with lifestyle variables (eg, smoking, drinking alcohol, a high body mass index [BMI]) or comorbidities).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Current Procedural Terminology codes for all patients who underwent CuTR between January 2012 and November 2018. Demographic data, including sex, age, weight, height, BMI, comorbidities, smoking, and alcohol consumption, were collected. The primary outcome was the need for revision surgery after initial CuTR. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for revision surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 678 patients who underwent CuTR, 120 patients (18%) needed revision surgery within 5 years. Sixty-six patients required subfascial transposition (55%) and 47 patients (39%) received in situ releases. Also, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, and comorbidities (except for spinal disc herniation) were similar between the primary and revision subgroup. Age at first occurrence was significantly lower in the revision group (48 years for revision vs 52 years for primary surgery). Moreover, cervical spinal disc herniation was associated with revision surgery (13% vs 6% in the primary group).

CONCLUSIONS

Age and medical history of cervical spinal disc herniation are associated with an increased risk of revision surgery. More importantly, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, and other comorbidities are not associated with increased risk of revision surgery within our sample.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Ulnar nerve decompression and transposition with versus without supercharged end-to-side motor nerve transfer for advanced cubital tunnel syndrome: a randomized comparison study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare ulnar nerve decompression and anterior subfascial transposition with versus without supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve-to-ulnar motor nerve transfer for advanced cubital tunnel syndrome, to describe performing the nerve transfer through a small incision, and to investigate predictive factors for poor recovery following the procedure.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and October 2016, 93 patients were randomly allocated to a study group (n = 45) and a control group (n = 48). Patients in the study group were treated with supercharged motor nerve transfer via a 5-cm incision following decompression and anterior subfascial transposition. Patients in the control group were treated with decompression and anterior subfascial transposition alone. Postoperative pinch strength and compound muscle action potential amplitude (CMAPa) were assessed. Function of the limb was assessed based on the Gabel/Amadio scale. Between-group data were compared, and significance was set at p < 0.05. Potential risk factors were collected from demographic data and disease severity indicators.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up at 2 years, the results of the study group were superior to those of the control group with regard to postoperative pinch strength (75.13% ± 7.65% vs 62.11% ± 6.97%, p < 0.05); CMAPa of the first dorsal interossei (17.17 ± 5.84 mV vs 12.20 ± 4.09 mV, p < 0.01); CMAPa of abductor digiti minimi (11.57 ± 4.04 mV vs 8.43 ± 6.11 mV, p < 0.01); and excellent to good results (0.67 for the study group vs 0.35 for the control group, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the advanced age (OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.25-4.10; p = 0.003) in the study group was related to unsatisfactory outcome in the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of advanced cubital tunnel syndrome, additional supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve-to-ulnar motor nerve transfer may produce a better function of the hand. The authors also found that cases in the elderly were related to unsatisfactory postoperative results for these patients and that they could be informed of the possibility of worsening surgery results.

Revision Peripheral Nerve Surgery of the Upper Extremity

Peripheral nerve injuries of the upper extremity can result from a wide array of etiologies, with the two most common being compression neuropathy and traumatic injuries. These types of injuries are common and can be psychologically, functionally, and financially devastating to the patient. A detailed preoperative evaluation is imperative for appropriate management. Traumatic injuries can typically be treated with local burial techniques, targeted muscle reinnervation, and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces. Median nerve compression is frequently managed with complete release of the antebrachial fascia/transverse carpal ligament and/or use of flap coverage such as the hypothenar fat pad flap and local muscle flaps. Ulnar nerve compression is commonly managed via submuscular transposition, subcutaneous transposition, neurolysis, and nerve wrapping. In this review, we discuss the preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, and advantages and disadvantages of each treatment modality for patients with compressive and traumatic upper extremity nerve injuries.

Ultrasound-Assisted Precise In Situ Decompression for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Objective

To explore the effect of locating the ulnar nerve compression sites and guiding the small incision so as to decompress the ulnar nerve in situ on the elbow by high‐frequency ultrasound before operation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 patients who underwent ultrasound‐assisted in situ decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome from May 2018 to August 2019. The patients' average age was 51.13 ± 7.35 years, mean duration of symptoms was 6.51 ± 1.96 months, and mean postoperative follow‐up was 6.07 ± 0.82 months. Nine patients had Dellon's stage mild, 39 had stage moderate, and eight had stage severe. Ultrasound and electromyography were completed in all patients before operation. The presence of ulnar nerve compressive lesion, the specific location, and the reason and extent of compression were determined by ultrasound. A small incision in situ surgery was given to decompress the ulnar nerve according to the pre‐defined compressive sites.

Results

All patients underwent in situ decompression. The compression sites around the elbow were as follows: two in the arcade of Struthers, one in the medial intermuscular septum, four in the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle, five beside the cyst of the proximal flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), and the remaining 44 cases were all from the compression between Osborne's ligament to the two heads of the FCU. The compression localizations diagnosed by ultrasound were confirmed by operations. Preoperative ultrasound confirmed no ulnar nerve subluxation in all cases. The postoperative outcomes were satisfactory. There was no recurrence or aggravation of symptoms in this group of patients according to the modified Bishop scoring system; results showed that 43 cases were excellent, 10 were good, and three were fair.

Conclusions

High‐frequency ultrasound can accurately and comprehensively evaluate the ulnar nerve compression and the surrounding tissues, thus providing significant guidance for the precise minimally invasive treatment of ulnar nerve compression.

Benefits of a collagen membrane for recurrent ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow: A series of 40 cases

The rate of failure or recurrence after ulnar nerve release at the elbow is up to 25%. Various biomaterials have been developed to protect nerves from postoperative adhesions. The aim of this study was to review a case series of 40 surgical revision procedures of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, protected by a collagen membrane (Cova™ ORTHO). Forty patients who had this revision surgery between January 2013 and December 2017 were reviewed: 34 were evaluated in person, 6 were evaluated over the phone. The operation consisted in release of the ulnar nerve, anterior subcutaneous transposition and nerve protection using a collagen membrane. We assessed the following parameters with an average follow-up of 4 years and 3 months: paresthesia, night awakening, quality of life (QuickDASH score) and neuropathic pain (DN4 questionnaire). The outcome was determined with the Gabel & Amadio score. The patients' satisfaction was evaluated. A significant decrease in paresthesia and night awakening was found (p < 0.05). The average Gabel & Amadio score improved from 4.4 to 6.7 with 5 excellent, 19 good, 9 fair, and 1 poor result. The average DN4 was 5/10 and the QuickDASH score was 40.1. Eighty percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome. Surgical revision of the ulnar nerve at the elbow remains a delicate operation without a gold standard. This case series found good or excellent results in 70% of patients. Surgical revision of the ulnar nerve with a collagen membrane is a reliable alternative among other possibilities for ulnar nerve release at the elbow.

Nerve wrapping for recurrent compression neuropathy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The recurrence of symptoms following primary nerve compression surgery can occur in up to 25% of cases. Nerve wrapping can be utilised for revision surgery. An ideal barrier should minimise the chance of fibrosis, scarring and allow for adequate nerve gliding. This review evaluates the use of autologous or commercially available allograft and xenograft options as barriers against nerve scarring following revision surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid Embase and Cochrane databases were searched using the All Fields Index. Nine hundred titles underwent title screening with 11 studies being included in the final analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool. PRISMA guidelines were followed at all stages and the review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42020182818).

RESULTS

The 11 studies comprised of all case series. In total, 114 patients were included, with ages ranging from 28 to 90. Previously, the number of revision surgeries ranged from 0 to 5. Autologous veins were used in 6 studies, collagen in 3 studies and human amniotic membrane in 2 studies. Improvements in subjective and objective outcomes were seen with all wrap types. Pain was the most common residual symptom (46% of patients). The most common complication was pain at the donor site following vein harvest (19% of patients).

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review to summarise the outcomes of nerve wraps for revision compression neuropathy. While improvements in outcomes were reported, further comparative studies are needed to determine the best nerve wrap.

Risk factors for revision cubital tunnel surgery✰

While surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) results in the improvement of pain, paresthesia and restoration of motor function, there is a subset of patients who do not improve after primary surgery and require revision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for revision after primary CuTS. A retrospective review of patients who underwent revision CuTS after unsuccessful primary surgery from February 1989 to May 2009 was performed. Data regarding patients' demographics, age at primary and revision surgeries, handedness, presenting symptoms and the duration, physical examination, McGowan grading, electrodiagnostic findings and final outcomes were collected. A total of 1239 patients undergoing 1279 cubital tunnel surgeries were identified; of which 17 patients who underwent 18 revision CuTS met our inclusion criteria. Forty-one randomly selected consecutive patients who underwent primary CuTS (control cohort) were compared to identify the risk factors associated with revision CuTS. Younger age at presentation, greater static 2-point discrimination (S2PD) and a history of diabetes were associated with a greater number of revision surgeries. Patients requiring revision for primary CuTS were 8.4 years on average younger, had greater S2PD and were more likely to have diabetes. Pain as a presenting symptom compared to weakness and numbness was also a more common complaint in this cohort of patients. Future larger multicenter prospective studies are recommended.

Outcomes of revision neurolysis of the ulnar nerve and ulnar groove plasty for persistent and recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome-A retrospective study of 21 cases

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing revision surgical treatment of the ulnar nerve at the elbow for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) will have worse results compared to patients successfully treated with primary surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluated clinical outcomes of revision neurolysis and ulnar groove plasty for recurrent and persistent cubital tunnel syndrome after failed surgical treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective investigation included patients presented with recurrent and persistent CuTS who were treated surgically with combination of revision neurolysis and ulnar groove plasty at a single institution from May 2006 to Oct 2016 with postoperative follow-up more than 24 months. Demographic data of all patients including age, sex, months to revision surgery, presenting symptoms after index surgery, previous surgical procedure and intraoperative findings were all recorded and pre-operative and post-operative data were compared. McGowen grading was used to evaluated functional impairment before and after revision surgery.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients were identified with recurrent and persistent CuTS after primary surgery and 21 patients (75%) were completed in this study with an average age was 56 years, mean duration of symptoms was 17.24 months, and mean postoperative follow-up was 35.38 months. 17 patients had McGowan stage III and 4 had stage II preoperatively. The most common cause of recurrent and persistent CuTS was perineural fibrosis with or without kink which accounts for 86.36% according to intraoperative findings. McGowan grading improved after revision neurolysis and ulnar groove plasty is 80.95%. Improvement of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and 2-point discrimination test were 81.25% and 85.71%, respectively. Patients satisfaction after revision neurolysis and ulnar groove plasty was 95.24%.

CONCLUSION

The favorable results of this study demonstrated that revision neurolysis and ulnar groove plasty as the treatment of choice for recurrent or persistent cubital tunnel syndrome.

Revision surgery for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Indications for revision surgery are unclear in refractory cubital tunnel syndrome patients, and the optimal surgical method has not been determined. The systematic review evaluates the evidence of functional outcome for revision surgery in refractory cubital tunnel syndrome patients.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that functional outcome of revision surgery in refractory cubital tunnel syndrome will be favorable.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Ovid/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases using the keywords "cubital tunnel syndrome" or "recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome" and "revision surgery" according to the MeSH index for English-language studies. We performed a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018096622).

RESULTS

Based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria, one level 3b study and nine level 4 studies were identified, including 195 elbows of 192 patients aged 15-75 years. The remission period for recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome was 6-21 months, and the follow-up period was 6-113 months. Transposition surgery was the primary surgery in 99 (51%) of 178 elbows. The most common intraoperative finding at revision surgery was perineural scarring (79%), with the most frequent entrapment site being the medial intermuscular septum (33%). The most common revision surgery was submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve (75%). Most studies reported favorable outcomes, although outcomes varied widely among studies.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to summarize the functional outcomes of revision surgery for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome which showed to be favorable. Functional outcomes were averagely reported and varied widely. A consensus regarding the functional outcomes parameter after surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome is urgently needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, systematic review.

Pain and Function Following Revision Cubital Tunnel Surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine pain and functional outcomes following revision cubital tunnel surgery and to identify predictors of poor postoperative outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients undergoing revision cubital tunnel surgery over a 5-year period at a high-volume peripheral nerve center. Intraoperative findings, demographic and injury factors, and outcomes were reviewed. Average pain, worst pain, and impact of pain on self-perceived quality of life were each measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Function was evaluated using pinch and grip strength, as well as the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Differences in preoperative and postoperative pain, strength, and DASH were analyzed using nonparametric tests. Predictors of postoperative average pain were evaluated using odds ratios and linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 50 patients (mean age: 46.3 ± 12.5 years; 29 [68%] male) undergoing 52 revision ulnar nerve transpositions (UNTs). Pain VAS scores decreased significantly following revision UNT. Strength and DASH scores demonstrated nonsignificant improvements postoperatively. Worse preoperative pain and greater than 1 prior cubital tunnel procedure were significant predictors of worse postoperative average pain VAS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients can and do improve following revision cubital tunnel surgery, particularly as it relates to pain. Intraoperative findings during the revision procedure suggest that adherence to specific principles in the primary operation is key to prevention of secondary cubital tunnel syndrome.

Patient-Related Risk Factors for Infection Following Ulnar Nerve Release at the Cubital Tunnel: An Analysis of 15,188 Cases

BACKGROUND

Although cubital tunnel release is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure, the overall incidence of and independent risk factors for infection largely remain undefined in the current literature.

PURPOSE

To establish the rate of postoperative infection after isolated cubital tunnel release and define relevant patient-related risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level 3.

METHODS

All Medicare-insured patients undergoing ulnar nerve decompression at the cubital tunnel from 2010 through 2012 were identified. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was utilized to evaluate the impact of patient-related risk factors for postoperative infection.

RESULTS

A total of 330 (2.17%) postoperative infections were identified in 15,188 cases. The majority (87%) were managed nonoperatively, while 13% required surgical debridement. The most significant risk factors for infection included hemodialysis use (odds ratio [OR], 2.47), chronic anemia (OR, 2.24), age <65 years (OR, 2.08), tobacco use (OR, 1.65), morbid obesity (OR, 1.53), inflammatory arthritis (OR, 1.43), depression (OR, 1.36), hyperlipidemia (OR, 1.33), male sex (OR, 1.32), and chronic lung disease (OR, 1.29).

CONCLUSION

The present study was adequately powered to determine numerous patient-related risk factors for infection following cubital tunnel release.

Risk factors for revision surgery following isolated ulnar nerve release at the cubital tunnel: a study of 25,977 cases

BACKGROUND

The literature investigating risk factors for failure after decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow (cubital tunnel release [CuTR]) is limited. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of isolated CuTR, defined as progression to subsequent ipsilateral revision surgery.

METHODS

The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files from 2005 to 2012 were queried for patients undergoing CuTR. Patients undergoing any concomitant procedures were excluded. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate patient-related risk factors for ipsilateral revision surgery. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each risk factor.

RESULTS

A total of 25,977 patients underwent primary CuTR, and 304 (1.4%) of those with ≥2 years of follow-up required revision surgery. Although the rate of primary procedures is on the rise (P = .002), the revision rate remains steady (P = .148). Significant, independent risk factors for revision surgery included age <65 years (OR, 1.5; P < .001), obesity (OR, 1.3; P = .022), morbid obesity (OR, 1.3; P = .044), tobacco use (OR, 2.0; P < .001), diabetes (OR, 1.3; P = .011), hyperlipidemia (OR, 1.2; P = .015), chronic liver disease (OR, 1.6; P = .001), chronic anemia (OR, 1.6; P = .001), and hypercoagulable disorder (OR, 2.1; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of failure requiring ipsilateral revision surgery after CuTR remained steadily low (1.4%) during the study period. There are numerous patient-related risk factors that are independently associated with an increased risk for revision surgery, the most significant of which are tobacco use, younger age, hypercoagulable disorder, liver disease, and anemia.

Recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome treated with revision neurolysis and amniotic membrane nerve wrapping

BACKGROUND

Perineural scarring of the ulnar nerve is a predominant cause of symptom recurrence after surgical treatment for primary cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). We report our preliminary experience in revision ulnar nerve decompression and nerve wrapping with an amniotic membrane allograft adhesion barrier for treatment of recurrent CuTS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review with prospective follow-up of patients with recurrent CuTS who were treated with revision neurolysis with amniotic membrane nerve wrapping. Preoperative elbow motion, grip and pinch strengths, pain level on the visual analog scale level, and the 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand functional outcome score were compared with postoperative values using paired t testing. Symptom characteristics, physical examination findings, complications, and level of satisfaction were also obtained.

RESULTS

Eight patients (mean age, 47.5 years) who had undergone at least 2 prior ulnar nerve operations satisfied study inclusion. At mean postoperative follow-up of 30 months, significant improvements were noted across all patients in visual analog scale pain levels (-3.5 vs. preoperatively; P < .0001), 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (-30 vs. preoperatively; P < .0001), and grip strength (+25 pounds vs. preoperatively; P < .0001). Pinch strength and elbow motion were also significantly improved for those patients with comparative preoperative data available. All patients expressed subjective satisfaction with their results. No adverse reactions or complications occurred in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulnar nerve wrapping with amniotic membrane allograft, when combined with revision neurolysis, was a safe and subjectively effective treatment for patients with debilitating recurrent CuTS.

The anconeus epitrochlearis muscle may protect against the development of cubital tunnel syndrome: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVE The authors hypothesized that when the anatomical variant of an anconeus epitrochlearis is present, the risk of developing cubital tunnel syndrome would be reduced by replacing the normal roof of the cubital tunnel (Osborne's ligament) with a more forgiving muscular structure, the anconeus epitrochlearis. The authors further hypothesized that when the presence of an anconeus epitrochlearis contributes to ulnar neuropathy, it would be secondary to muscular hypertrophy, thereby making it more likely to occur in the dominant arm. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to evaluate these hypotheses. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was performed by reviewing the records of all adult patients who underwent operative intervention for cubital tunnel syndrome between 2005 and 2014 as the experimental group and all asymptomatic patients in the medical literature who were part of a series reporting the prevalence of an anconeus epitrochlearis as the control group. The primary outcome of interest was the presence of an anconeus epitrochlearis in asymptomatic individuals versus patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. RESULTS During the study period, 168 patients underwent decompression of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome, and an anconeus epitrochlearis was found at surgery in 9 (5.4%) patients. The control group consisted of 634 asymptomatic patients from the medical literature, and an anconeus epitrochlearis was present in 98 (15.5%) of these patients. An anconeus epitrochlearis was present significantly less frequently in the symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic individuals (p < 0.001). Among patients undergoing surgical decompression, an anconeus epitrochlearis was associated with symptoms in the dominant arm (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS The authors found that an anconeus epitrochlearis was present significantly less often in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome than in asymptomatic controls. The mechanism of protection may be that this muscle decreases the rigidity of the entrance into the cubital tunnel. When an anconeus epitrochlearis does contribute to cubital tunnel syndrome, it is significantly more likely to occur in the dominant arm, possibly due to repetitive use and hypertrophy of the anconeus epitrochlearis. The presence of an anconeus epitrochlearis may be protective against the development of cubital tunnel syndrome, although this is a preliminary finding.

The Management of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Symptomatic cubital tunnel syndrome is a condition that frequently prompts patients to seek hand surgical care. Although cubital tunnel syndrome is readily diagnosed, achieving complete symptom resolution remains challenging. This article reviews related anatomy, clinical presentation, and current management options for cubital tunnel syndrome with an emphasis on contemporary outcomes research.

Complications of compressive neuropathy: prevention and management strategies

Compressive neuropathies of the upper extremity are common and can result in profound disability if left untreated. Nerve releases are frequently performed, but can be complicated by both iatrogenic events and progression of neuropathy. In this review, we examine the management of postoperative complications after 2 common nerve compression release procedures: carpal tunnel release and cubital tunnel release.

Outcomes of revision surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome

PURPOSE

To compare both validated patient-rated and objective outcomes of patients following revision cubital tunnel surgery to a similar group of patients who underwent primary surgery.

METHODS

This case-control investigation enrolled 56 patients treated surgically for cubital tunnel syndrome (28 revision cases, 28 primary controls) at a tertiary center. Patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were eligible. All patients completed an in-office study evaluation. Revision participants represented 55% of potential patients in our practice and controls (treated only with primary surgery) were chosen at random from our practice to reach a 1:1 case to control ratio. Preoperative McGowan grading was confirmed similar between the groups. Outcome measures included validated patient outcome questionnaires (Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation, Levine-Katz questionnaire), symptoms, and physical examination findings. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the patient groups.

RESULTS

Despite 79% of revision patients reporting symptomatic improvement, revision patients reported worse outcomes on all measured standardized questionnaires compared with primary patients. The Levine-Katz questionnaire indicated mild residual symptoms in the primary group (1.6) versus moderate remaining symptoms following revision surgery (2.3). The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation also indicated superior results for the control group (9 ± 10) compared with the revision group (32 ± 22). Revision patients had a higher frequency of constant symptoms, elevated 2-point discrimination, and diminished pinch strength. McGowan grading improved after 25% of revision surgeries versus 64% of primary surgeries, and 21% of revision patients had deterioration of their McGowan grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective and objective outcomes of revision patients in this cohort were inferior to outcomes of similar patients following primary surgery. Revision surgery can be offered in the setting of persistent or recurrent symptoms that are unexplained by an alternative diagnosis, but patients should be counseled that complete resolution of symptoms is unlikely.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Does the ulnar nerve enlarge after surgical transposition?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that symptomatic transposed ulnar nerves have a larger average cross-sectional area (CSA) than symptomatic in situ ulnar nerves.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the charts and sonograms of 68 patients who had failed ulnar nerve transposition compared to 48 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who had not undergone surgical management. In addition, postoperative sonograms were compared with preoperative studies when available. Failure was defined as persistence or recurrence of symptoms of ulnar neuropathy postoperatively. The cross-sectional area of the nerve, subjective echogenicity, and residual sites of compression were recorded. Groups were subsequently compared by t tests.

RESULTS

The failed ulnar nerve transposition group showed a mean cross-sectional area ± SD of 17.26 ± 9.93 mm(2), whereas the control group showed a mean cross-sectional area of 13.45 ± 7.33 mm(2). This difference was statistically significant (P= .018). Nontransposed nerves were more likely to have identifiable sites of compression (P< .05). There was a trend toward postoperative enlargement in the 6 patients with available preoperative imaging (P = .17). No difference in subjective echogenicity was found in this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with failed ulnar nerve transposition show a significantly enlarged cross-sectional area when compared to symptomatic nerves in situ. Although a specific etiology for this difference cannot be determined, the data suggest that the reference ranges for the cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve may need to be revised for those who have undergone surgery.

Periodontal disease and the oral-systemic connection: "is it all the RAGE?"

Ample studies have reported on the association between periodontal diseases, a persistent inflammatory process, and other chronic ailments such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer disease, and cancer. Other conditions such as low birth weight and premature delivery due to chorioamnionitis are also known to be linked to poor periodontal health. Although much epidemiologic data support these associations, a cause-and-effect relationship has not been established. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a multiligand receptor expressed on various cell membranes, including immune, endothelial, and epithelial, and cells of the central nervous system. This receptor, which is frequently associated with proinflammatory responses, has been shown to be activated by various ligands such as high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1/amphoterin), amyloid fibrils, transthyrein, Mac-1 (Integrin Mac-1), as well as advanced glycation end products (AGEs). Recent studies indicate that signaling through RAGE has been implicated as an underlying condition in diverse pathologies including periodontal disease, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer disease, cancer, and neurologic conditions. Review of the literature supports the hypothesis that activation of RAGE by ligands in a variety of cell types and tissues may play a role in oral systemic associations. In addition, the ligand cell source and timing of RAGE stimulation may determine the disease produced by this axis. Understanding the distribution and functions of RAGE and its ligands would enhance clinicians' knowledge on pathogenesis of the oral-systemic connection.