Complications Related to the Treatment of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

ChatGPT Responses to Common Questions About Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Reliable Resource for Parents?

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate the ability of ChatGPT, an AI-powered online chatbot, to answer frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

METHODS

Seven FAQs regarding SCFE were presented to ChatGPT. Initial responses were recorded and compared with evidence-based literature and reputable online resources. Responses were subjectively rated as "excellent response requiring no further clarification," "satisfactory response requiring minimal clarification," "satisfactory response requiring moderate clarification," or "unsatisfactory response requiring substantial clarification."

RESULTS

ChatGPT was frequently able to provide satisfactory responses that required only minimal clarification. One response received an excellent rating and required no further clarification, while only 1 response from ChatGPT was rated unsatisfactory and required substantial clarification.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT is able to frequently provide satisfactory responses to FAQs regarding SCFE while appropriately reiterating the importance of always consulting a medical professional.

Static Plantar Pressure under Different Conditions in Children with Surgically Treated Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common hip disease during infancy and adolescence. Our study aimed to analyze static plantar pressure in children with surgically treated unilateral SCFE.

METHODS

Twenty-two children with right SCFE with in situ fixation with one percutaneous screw were assessed by PoData plantar pressure analysis under three different conditions (open eyes, eyes closed, and head retroflexed).

RESULTS

The total foot loading was significantly higher on the unaffected limb compared with the affected one for all the three testing conditions (p < 0.05). When assessing the differences between testing conditions, there were no significant differences for the right and left foot loadings, or for the three sites of weight distribution, except for the right fifth metatarsal head (lower loading in eyes-closed condition in comparison to eyes open, p = 0.0068), left fifth metatarsal head (increased loading in head-retroflexed condition in comparison to eyes open, p = 0.0209), and left heel (lower loading in head-retroflexed condition in comparison to eyes open, p = 0.0293).

CONCLUSION

Even after a successful surgical procedure, differences in foot loading can impact the postural static activities in different conditions (natural eyes-open, eyes-closed, or head-retroflexed posture).

The Effect of Human Growth Hormone Treatment on the Development of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Cohort Analysis With 6 Years of Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common hip disorder in adolescents that can result in substantial complications, impacting the quality of life. Human Growth Hormone (HGH) administration may elevate the risk of SCFE, though the relationship remains unclear. Clarifying this association could enable better monitoring and earlier diagnosis of SCFE in patients receiving HGH. The aim of the study is to investigate the association between HGH administration and the incidence of SCFE.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX research database from January 2003 to December 2022. The study included 2 cohorts: an HGH cohort including 36,791 patients aged below 18 years receiving HGH therapy and a control group consisting of patients who did not receive HGH therapy. A 1:1 propensity score matching technique was employed to ensure comparability between the HGH and no-HGH cohorts. The primary outcome measure was the development of SCFE identified by International Classification of Diseases codes. For comparative analysis, both risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios were computed to evaluate the association between HGH therapy and the development of SCFE.

RESULTS

The HGH cohort had an increased risk of SCFE compared with the no-HGH cohort (RR: 3.5, 95% CI: 2.073, 5.909, P <0.001) and had an increased hazard of developing SCFE (hazard ratio: 2.627, 95% CI: 1.555, 4.437, P <0.001). Patients with higher exposure to HGH (defined as >10 prescriptions) had an RR of 1.914 (95% CI: 1.160, 3.159, P =0.010) when compared with their counterparts with ≤10 prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest study to date, HGH administration was associated with an elevated risk of SCFE in children in a dose-dependent manner.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic retrospective cohort study.

The incidence and management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a population-based study

We aimed to investigate the national trends in the incidence and management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and to report the need for reoperations. We included all <19-year-old patients hospitalised for SCFE in 2004-2014 in mainland Finland (n=159). Data from the Finnish Care Register for Health Care, Statistics Finland, and Turku University Hospital patient charts were analyse for the incidence of SCFE in 2004-2012, the length of stay, and the type of surgery with respect to age, gender, study year, and season. The reoperations and rehospitalisations in 2004-2014 for SCFE were analysed for 2-10 years after surgery. In 2004 to 2012, primary surgery for SCFE was performed for 126 children. The average annual incidence of SCFE was 1.06/100 000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.38) in girls and 1.35/100 000 (95% CI 1.07-1.70) in boys. The median age at surgery was lower in girls than in boys (11 and 13 years, respectively, p<0.0001). During the study period, there was no significant change in the incidence of SCFE (p=0.9330), the type of primary procedures performed (p=0.9988), or the length of stay after the primary procedure (p=0.2396). However, the length of stay after percutaneous screw fixation was shorter compared with open reduction and fixation (mean 3.4 and 7.9 days, respectively, p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the rate of reoperations according to the type of primary surgery. In conclusion, the incidence of SCFE and the proportion of different primary surgeries have recently remained stable in Finland.

Surgeon Preference for Prophylactic Contralateral Fixation in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) Patients: A Nationwide POSNA Survey Study

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that 11% to 60% of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients will develop contralateral pathology, usually within 18 months after the first event. Despite this, prophylactic fixation remains controversial, and there is significant variability in surgeon preferences. Thus, this study aimed to determine which factors predict surgeon preferences for prophylactic contralateral pinning in SCFE patients.

METHODS

We designed a survey for pediatric orthopedic surgeons to collect data on (1) surgeon and hospital characteristics, (2) individual preference for contralateral SCFE pinning in three disparate hypothetical scenarios, and (3) personal risk-aversion traits. The questionnaire was distributed across the United States by the POSNA Evidence-Based Orthopaedics Committee. All POSNA members were eligible to respond. We performed analyses to evaluate the role of patient risk factors in hypothetical surgical decision-making and to determine if surgical training, hospital characteristics, and geographic region influenced prophylactic pinning in a surgeon's real-life practice.

RESULTS

A total of 126 POSNA members responded to the survey. In the last year, a median of 6.5 SCFE patients was seen per surgeon (1243 patients total). A median of 10% of those patients underwent prophylactic contralateral fixation. In multiple analyses, surgeons were influenced by body mass index, open triradiate cartilage, patient race, various endocrine abnormalities, and specific radiographic measurements when deciding to fix the contralateral side prophylactically. Moreover, in multivariate regression, more years in practice and a hospital size of 500+ beds predicted fewer prophylactic fixation procedures (all P <0.05). Surgeons practicing in the South Atlantic, New England, and Mountain regions of the United States estimated the highest rate of contralateral pinning.

CONCLUSIONS

This study's findings suggest that multiple factors influence surgeons' decisions to prophylactically fix the contralateral side in SCFE patients. Surgical training, hospital characteristics, and geographical regions played a role in decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Risk of Avascular Necrosis with The Modified Dunn Procedure in SCFE Patients: A Meta-Analysis

In situ stabilization is a widely accepted treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) despite risks of avascular necrosis (AVN) and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The modified Dunn procedure with surgical hip dislocation attempts to maintain epiphyseal perfusion and allows anatomic epiphyseal repositioning, theoretically reducing AVN and FAI risks. We systematically evaluated the literature, elucidating overall and stability-stratified rates of AVN following the modified Dunn procedure, and revision rates in non-AVN patients. Using Ovid and MEDLINE (PubMed), studies involving the modified Dunn procedure were evaluated for age, stability, preoperative slip (Southwick) angle, ROM at follow-up, outcome metrics, and revisions. Utilizing a random effect model of proportions, we determined overall and stability-stratified AVN rates, and revision rates in patients without AVN.673 patients (688 SCFEs) who underwent modified Dunn procedure were included. Overall AVN rate was 14.3% with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 9.3 to 20.2%. AVN rate in stable slips was 10.9% (95% CI: 6.0 to 17.1%) and 19.9% (95% CI: 12.8% to 28.1%) in unstable slips. Revision rate in non-AVN patients was 13.3% (95% CI: 8.3% to 19.2%). Fixation failures occurred following K-wire or small-caliber (<6.5 mm) screw fixation. Overall mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) was excellent (>90 points). Mean HHS was 98.9 points (range of means: 86 to 99 points) in stable cases, and 90.5 points (range of means: 73 to 98 points) in unstable cases. Patients undergoing modified Dunn procedure had excellent clinical outcomes and low incidences of AVN. Further studies are needed to determine if modified Dunn osteotomy with surgical hip dislocation is a viable alternative to in situ pinning for treatment of severe SCFE.

The Effect of the Type of Screw Fixation Used in the Treatment of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Background

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains among the most common hip disorders in the adolescent population. The management of SCFE remains controversial; however, the aim of fixation is to stabilize the physis and prevent further slippage. In situ fixation remains the gold standard; however, in the young population, it can lead to reduced femoral neck growth and complications such as leg length discrepancies. The ideal form of in situ fixation for mild to moderate SCFE would stabilize the slip and allow continued proximal femoral growth. This study aimed to determine if partially threaded screws allowed more neck growth than fully threaded screws.

Methods

A retrospective review of the radiographs of all patients undergoing in situ fixation for SCFE using partially threaded and fully threaded screws. Measurements included neck length, neck-to-screw ratio, neck shaft angle, neck width, and articular-trochanteric distance. Parameters were compared over a two-year period to determine whether there was any difference in proximal femoral growth between the two types of screws.

Results

Fully threaded screw neck length increased by 5 mm versus 5 mm for proximally threaded screws (P ≤ 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to neck width, neck shaft angle, and articular-trochanteric distance.

Conclusions

No difference was observed in proximal femoral growth. Regardless of which type of fixation is used, neck length continues to increase by approximately 3 mm per year.

Short-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcome after Stabilization of Femoral Capital Physeal Fractures with Cortical Positional Screws in 39 Cats

OBJECTIVE

 The aim of this study was to report the short-term clinical and radiographic outcome for the treatment of femoral capital physeal fractures with cortical positional screws in cats.

STUDY DESIGN

 Medical records and radiographs of cats with femoral capital physeal fractures stabilized with cortical positional screws were retrospectively reviewed. Signalment, bodyweight, femoral head affected, fracture classification, fracture reduction, implants, concurrent orthopaedic injuries, osteoarthritis, femoral neck osteolysis, complications and 6-week follow-up clinical results were recorded. A short- to long-term follow-up was performed by telephone questionnaire with the owners.

RESULTS

 Forty-six fractures in 39 cats met the inclusion criteria. In 45/46 fractures, radiographic signs of bone healing were present and 35/39 cats were assessed as walking normally by a veterinarian at 6-week follow-up. There was a significant increase in radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (p=0.037) and femoral neck osteolysis (p=0.001) on 6-week follow-up radiographs. Pre- and postoperative osteoarthritis and femoral neck osteolysis were not associated with clinical outcome. The mean follow-up period for the telephone questionnaire was 48 months (range, 5-147 months). Seven out of 25 owners reported a gait abnormality in the short- to long-term.

CONCLUSION

 Femoral capital physeal fractures in cats can be treated successfully with the use of cortical positional screws. This technique may be considered as an alternative to other primary fixation techniques and salvage procedures for the treatment of femoral capital physeal injuries in cats. This technique seemed successful in cats with a low-grade preoperative femoral neck osteolysis.

Prophylactic fixation of the unaffected contralateral side in children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis seems favorable: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) occurs in adolescents and has an incidence of around 10 per 100000 children. Children presenting with a unilateral SCFE are 2335 times more likely to develop a contralateral SCFE than the general population. Prognostic factors that have been suggested to increase the risk of contralateral slip include a younger patient, an underlying endocrine disorder, growth hormone use and a higher radiographic posterior sloping angle. However, there is still much debate on the advantages and disadvantages of prophylactic fixation of the unaffected side in an otherwise healthy patient.

AIM

To investigate the risk rate of contralateral SCFE and assess the (dis)advantages of prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane databases. Search terms included ‘slipped capital femoral epiphysis,’ ‘fixation,’ ‘contralateral,’ and derivatives. The eligibility of the acquired articles was independently assessed by the authors and additional relevant articles were included through cross-referencing. Publications were considered eligible for inclusion if they presented data about otherwise healthy children with primarily unilateral SCFE and the outcomes of prophylactically pinning their unaffected side, or about the rates of contralateral slips and complications thereof. The study quality of the included articles was assessed independently by the authors by means of the methodological index for non-randomized studies criteria.

RESULTS

Of 293 identified unique publications, we included 26 studies with a total of 12897 patients. 1762 patients (14%) developed a subsequent symptomatic contralateral slip. In addition, 38% of patients developed a subsequent slip on the contralateral side without experiencing clinical symptoms. The most outspoken advantage of prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in the literature is prevention of an (asymptomatic) slip, thus reducing the increased risk of avascular necrosis (AVN), cam morphology and osteoarthritis. Disadvantages include an increased risk of infection, AVN, peri-implant fractures, loss of fixation as well as migration of hardware and morphologic changes as a consequence of growth guidance. These risks, however, appeared to only occur incidentally and were usually mild compared to the risks involved with an actual SCFE.

CONCLUSION

The advantages of prophylactic pinning of the unaffected side in otherwise healthy patients with unilateral SCFE seem to outweigh the disadvantages. The final decision for treatment remains to be patient-tailored.

Comparing complications of outpatient management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and Blount’s disease: A database study

BACKGROUND

Currents trends in pediatric orthopaedics has seen an increase in surgeries being successfully completed in an outpatient setting. Two recent examples include slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and Blount’s disease. Surgical indications are well-studied for each pathology, but to our knowledge, there is an absence in literature analyzing safety and efficacy of inpatient vs outpatient management of either condition. We believed there would be no increase in adverse outcomes associated with outpatient treatment of either conditions.

AIM

To investigate whether outpatient surgery for SCFE and Blount’s disease is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.

METHODS

The 2015-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Registries were used to compare patient characteristics, rates of complications, and readmissions between outpatient and inpatient surgery for SCFE and Blount’s disease.

RESULTS

Total 1788 SCFE database entries were included, 30% were performed in an outpatient setting. In situ pinning was used in 98.5% of outpatient surgeries and 87.8% of inpatient surgeries (P < 0.0001). Inpatients had a greater percent of total complications than outpatients 2.57% and 1.65% respectively. Regarding Blount’s disease, outpatient surgeries constituted 41.2% of the 189 procedures included in our study. The majority of inpatients were treated with a tibial osteotomy, while the majority of outpatients had a physeal arrest (P < 0.0001). Complications were encountered in 7.4% of patients, with superficial surgical site infections and wound dehiscence being the most common. 1.6% of patients had a readmission. No differences in complication and readmission risks were found between inpatients and outpatients.

CONCLUSION

The current trend is shifting towards earlier discharges and performing procedures in an outpatient setting. This can be safely performed for a large portion of children with SCFE and Blount’s disease without increasing the risk of complications or readmissions. Osteotomies are more commonly performed in an inpatient setting where monitoring is available.

RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF SEVERE SCFE TREATMENT AT IOT-FMUSP FROM 2012 TO 2018

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the complications in patients with severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with the Dunn or modified Dunn procedure from 2012 to 2018 at the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo. Methods: Analysis of medical records, preoperative and postoperative radiographs with at least one year of radiographic follow-up of patients with severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Results: We reviewed the complications in 19 operated cases from 2012 to 2018, out of which 36.8% had osteonecrosis of the femoral head, one patient had chondrolysis, and another had postoperative infection. Conclusion: The osteonecrosis rate observed in this series of cases is similar to that described in other orthopedic facilities. We assessed factors that could potentially influence this outcome, including other characteristics of the patient (obesity, endocrine diseases, and history of sports activities) and of the health system. Level of Evidence III, Restropective Case Series.

Mechanical Failure of 2 Cannulated Screw Fixation for Unstable SCFE: A Case Report

CASE

A 13-year-old obese boy presented with an acute-on-chronic unstable left slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). He underwent in situ surgical fixation with two 6.5-mm fully threaded cannulated screws. At 6 months, he presented with mechanical failure of both screws. He underwent screw removal, revision in situ fixation, a peritrochanteric flexion and internal rotational osteotomy, and an open femoroplasty. The osteotomy healed at 6 weeks. The femoral physis took an additional year to close.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights an uncommon complication of in situ pinning of SCFE, discusses revision fixation options, and suggests possible prolonged physeal closure in severe slips.

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in an Adult with Panhypopituitarism: A Case Report

CASE

Our patient was a 31-year-old woman with previously undiagnosed panhypopituitarism who presented with bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Together with endocrinology, her treatment plan involved medical management of her panhypopituitarism and surgical correction with femoral neck osteotomy. Hormone deficiencies were corrected 6 weeks after replacement therapy began, and the patient was cleared for surgery. By 5 months after osteotomy, examination revealed delayed union and prominent screws bilaterally. Hardware exchange and repeat internal fixation were then performed. At 8 weeks after revision, she presented with avascular necrosis, and the decision was made to proceed with total hip arthroplasty. A 5-year follow-up period was documented.

CONCLUSION

This case presented a rare look at SCFE in an adult patient with panhypopituitarism. Other systemic illnesses that can contribute to SCFE or other orthopaedic issues include, but are not limited to, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes, vitamin D deficiency, renal osteodystrophy, Kallmann syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, and pathologies affecting the thyroid and pituitary gland.

Technical note: bone marrow aspirate needle to assist in-situ screw fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is characterized by posterior and inferior displacement of the capital femoral epiphysis in relationship to the metaphysis. Although universally accepted as a treatment modality for SCFE, in-situ pinning may be technically challenging in obese adolescents with large body habitus. Adequate screw position is important to achieve stabilization of the epiphysis and to allow closure of the growth plate. During the surgical procedure of in-situ pinning, it is crucial to obtain not only a perfect starting point but also an appropriate trajectory. However, creating a perfect entry point in obese patients with a large thigh may be troublesome. Often the pediatric orthopedic surgeon is faced with intraoperative challenges for screw placement including, but not limited to, the guidewire skiving down anteriorly on the metaphysis, and bending of the guidewire due to a large body habitus when the hip is positioned to obtain a lateral radiograph. We have used a bone marrow biopsy needle as an adjunct for placement of the guidewire during in-situ pinning for SCFE. This technical trick describes our method of using a bone marrow biopsy needle to ease the placement of a guidewire during in-situ pinning.

Hip arthroscopy following slipped capital femoral epiphysis fixation: chondral damage and labral tears findings

PURPOSE

This study investigated the association between chondrolabral damage and time to arthroscopic surgery for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

METHODS

This was a descriptive retrospective study that enrolled patients with SCFE who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoral osteochondroplasty after SCFE fixation. SCFE type, time from SCFE symptom onset or slip fixation surgery to hip arthroscopy and intraarticular arthroscopic findings were recorded. Acetabular chondrolabral damage was evaluated according to the Konan and Outerbridge classification systems. Nested analysis of variance and the chi-squared test were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

We analyzed 22 cases of SCFE in 17 patients (five bilateral). The mean age at the time of hip arthroscopy was 13.6 years-old (8-20), and mean time from SCFE fixation to arthroscopy was 25.1 months (3 weeks to 8 years). Labral frying was present in 20 cases, labral tears in 16 and acetabular chondral damage in 17. The most frequent lesion was type 3 (41%) (Konan classification). Two cases had a grade III and 1 had a grade II acetabular chondral lesion (Outerbridge classification). Positive associations were observed between time from SCFE to hip arthroscopy and hip intraarticular lesions evaluated using Konan (p = 0.004) and Outerbridge (p = 0.000) classification systems. There was no association between SCFE severity (chi-squared = 0.315), stability (chi-squared = 0.558) or temporality (chi-squared = 0.145) type and hip intraarticular lesions.

CONCLUSION

A longer time from SCFE symptom onset and fixation to hip arthroscopy is associated with greater acetabular chondrolabral damage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty for end-stage arthritis caused by childhood hip disease

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hip arthritis due to Legg-Calvé-Perthes (LCP) and slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) pose altered femoral anatomy, making hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) technically complicated. We examined implant survival and clinical symptoms in patients with a history of LCP or SCPE who underwent HRA for end-stage osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Data was collected for patients who underwent HRA for osteoarthritis due to LCP (n = 59) or SCFE (n = 32). Harris Hip Scores (HHS), UCLA activity scores, and radiographs were evaluated pre and postoperatively. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests and Kaplan-Meier Survivorship curves were used to analyse data.

RESULTS

Survivorship for freedom from revision or clinical failure was 93.55(95% CI, 78.47-98.18) at 5.79 years, up until the most recent follow-up of 11.23 years. There were 3 failures: 1 LCP due to instability at 2.4 years, 1 SCFE due to femoral neck fracture at 1 month, and another SCFE due to unexplained pain at 5.8 years. Five patients, 1 LCP and 4 SCFE, had retained hardware prior to surgery; 4 had their hardware removed during surgery. Postoperatively HHS and UCLA activity scores increased (p < 0.0001, for both measures). Leg-length discrepancy improved preoperatively from 7.9 (0.0-32) mm to 0.65 (0.0-10) mm postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Follow-up radiographs of all non-failure HRA patients revealed implants to be in good alignment with no indication of loosening.

CONCLUSION

Although HRA in SCFE and LCP patients increases technical difficulties, findings demonstrate excellent implant survival, no intraoperative complications, and improvements in leg-length discrepancies and clinical functional outcomes.

Predicting subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an evidence-based approach

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for developing a subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and provide a prediction score to quantify risk of subsequent slip at the time of initial presentation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients that presented with a unilateral SCFE between 2006 and 2017. Chart and radiographic review were performed to collect demographic, clinical and radiographic risk factors. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses and multivariate regression analysis were used to compare risk factors between patients that did or did not develop a subsequent contralateral SCFE.

RESULTS

This study included 183 patients and 33 patients (18%) developed a subsequent contralateral SCFE. Younger age at time of initial presentation, lower modified Oxford Score and smaller difference in epiphyseal-diaphyseal angle between both sides during index presentation were significant predictors of subsequent contralateral SCFE. Specifically, age ≤ 11 years, modified Oxford Score ≤ 20 and difference in epiphyseal-diaphyseal angle of ≤ 21° between both hips were predictive of a contralateral slip (Area Under the Curve = 0.78; p < 0.05). The presence of each risk factor increased the risk of subsequent contralateral SCFE and having all three risk factors increased the risk to 73%.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant risk of subsequent contralateral SCFE in patients with unilateral SCFE, and predictive risk factors include younger age, lower modified Oxford Score and smaller difference in epiphyseal-diaphyseal angle between the affected and unaffected hips.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Factors Affecting Outcomes of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a frequent cause of nontraumatic painful hip of the adolescence. It is the result of the separation of the proximal femoral growth cartilage at the level of the hypertrophic cell zone. The femoral neck metaphysis rotates externally and migrates proximally relative to the femoral head epiphysis, which is stably seated in the acetabulum; early diagnosis and in situ stabilization grants the best long term results. Numerous factors affect treatment outcomes. Not all implants have the same effect on the slipped physis. Application of the traditionally used implants, such as non-threaded pins and cannulated screws, is questioned. Modern implants are available, which stabilize the slip without accelerating physis fusion. This allows femoral head and neck growth and remodeling to limit the post-slip sequellae on hip anatomy and function. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) complicates almost all slips. It causes progressive labral and articular cartilage damage and leads to early hip osteoarthritis and total hip replacement, approximately ten years earlier compared to the general population. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is a dramatic complication, seen almost exclusively in unstable slips. It develops within months after the slip and leads to immediate articular joint degeneration and the need for total hip replacement. Another serious complication of SCFE is chondrolysis, which is a rapid progressive articular cartilage degeneration leading to a narrow joint space and restriction of hip motion. Implant-related complications, such as migration and loosening, may lead to the progression of the slip. Though bilateral disease is quite frequent, there is no consensus about the need for preventive surgery on the healthy contralateral hip. Diagnosis of SCFE is frequently missed or delayed, leading to slips of higher severity. Silent slippage of the capital femoral epiphysis is highly suspected as an underlying cause of cam-type FAI and early-onset hip osteoarthritis. There is controversy, whether asymptomatic implants should be removed. Novel surgical techniques, such as the modified Dunn procedure and hip arthroscopy, seem to be effective modalities for the prevention of FAI in SCFE.

SUFE and the internet: are healthcare information websites accessible to parents?

BACKGROUND

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis is an adolescent hip disorder requiring rapid surgical intervention. Faced with the prospect of their child undergoing surgery, many fearful parents will turn to the internet to provide information and reassurance. Previous studies have shown the orthopaedic information can be difficult to comprehend.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the readability of healthcare websites regarding slipped upper femoral epiphysis.

METHODS

The term Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis was searched in Google, Bing and Yahoo. The websites were evaluated using readability software with seven specialised readability tests including the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Coleman-Liau Index, Automated Readability Index and the Gunning Fog Index. The reading grade level (RGL) was also calculated.A Flesich Read Ease Score (FRES) score above 65 and an RGL of sixth grade and under was considered acceptable. Websites were also assessed for translation services.

RESULTS

21 unique websites were assessed. The average FRES was 52.5±15.4. Only 3 websites scored 65 or higher (14%). There was a statistically significant difference between website scores based on affiliation, with physician websites having the overall highest mean(p=0.004).The average RGL was 8.67±1.8. Only two websites met the accepted RGL criteria (9.5%) while five websites were marked as extremely difficult to understand (23.8%). Only five websites offered translations (23.8%). There was no statistically significant difference in readability scores between websites which offered translation and those which did not.One-sample t-tests showed that both the RGL (p<0.001; CI 1.83 to 3.49) and the FRES (p<0.001, CI -19.4 to -5.4) scores were significantly different from the accepted standard.

CONCLUSION

Most websites reviewed were above the recommended RGL, making content inaccessible. Improving readability and translation services would enhance the internet's usability as a healthcare tool for parents.

Avascular necrosis post unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a treatment algorithm with staged hinged hip distraction: mid-term results

BACKGROUND

Management of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is difficult. We proposed to ascertain if staged hip distraction could prevent collapse and recover the femoral head.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the hip database retrieved 16 children with unstable SCFE and AVN. All underwent capital realignment by surgical dislocation followed by 2nd-stage hinged hip distraction. Patient demographics and radiographic parameters of deformity, AVN and arthritis were collected. The patients scored their hip function both before and after intervention and at follow-up using the modified Harris Hip Score and Nonarthritic Hip score.

RESULTS

7 boys and 9 girls formed the study group (n = 16). The average age at surgery was 12.7 years (9-16 years). 8 rights hips and 8 left hips were involved. The average follow-up was 45 months (33-66 months). Group A (n = 7) had hip distraction only if the follow-up radiographs showed AVN changes and collapse. Based on the observations in Group A, the protocol was changed for Group B. Group B (n = 9) underwent hip distraction at 6 weeks of capital realignment for avascularity of the femoral head. In Group A, all patients had further collapse and advanced arthritis at follow-up. In Group B all patients had hip joint space restored and good hip function without pain at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-emptive application of hip distractor for those children with proven lack of blood flow to the femoral head is a potential option to stall the progression of AVN and to help recover useful hip function.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies

In orthopedic literature, there is little consensus regarding the best management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Controversies and disparate trends derive from differences in clinical presentation, various classifications, and a variety of surgical procedures that have been described. Currently, there are no evidence-based recommendations. Surgical procedures vary, and they can be divided into fixation in situ, compensatory osteotomies, and direct corrections of the deformity at the head–neck junction. The first and second group of procedures have so far not gained optimal control over the risk of avascular necrosis or cannot achieve an anatomically aligned epiphysis with normal blood supply. On the other hand, the third technique can achieve this target and prevent residual deformity and the development of early hip arthritis, but it is not widely accepted, because of its surgical complexity. The purpose of this work is to present an overview of current knowledge and provide an orientation on clinical and surgical management of the patient suffering from SCFE.

Patterns of Pain in Adolescents with Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively characterize pain locations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and evaluate pain locations as predictors of a delay in diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an institutional review board approved prospective study of 110 children who underwent surgery for SCFE at a tertiary children's hospital between 2009 and 2015. Standardized pain diagrams were completed by 107 children. Pain zones were designated via a composite diagram. Hips without hip pain were categorized as atypical; hips with hip pain were typical.

RESULTS

In total, 122 hips were eligible for pain zone analysis. Seventy hips (57.4%) had hip pain. Atypical pain was present in 52 hips (42.6%), which included groin pain in 17 hips (13.9%), thigh/leg pain in 43 (35.2%), knee pain in 32 (26.2%), and posterolateral pain of the hip and leg in 13 (10.7%). A combination of pain zones was present in 48 hips (39.3%). Forty-nine percent of patients had more than 1 visit until diagnosis. The three most common pain locations for typical hips were hip, hip/thigh, and hip/knee pain (77.2% of typical hips). The 3 most common pain locations for atypical hips were isolated thigh, knee, and groin (65.4% of atypical hips). The least common pain presentations had a longer duration of symptoms (P = .04) and more healthcare visits before diagnosis (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of pain locations is common in SCFE. Less frequent pain presentations may delay diagnosis. Delays in diagnosis continue despite education efforts.

Intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy compared with in-situ pinning for the management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy was initially introduced to restore the morphology of the proximal femur after slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). However, whether this procedure results in a higher risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) or lower incidence of cam deformity than in-situ pinning is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy and in-situ pinning to treat SCFE in children. Twenty-three children who suffered from SCFE underwent either intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy (eight patients, eight hips) or in-situ pinning (15 patients, 18 hips) between 2006 and 2014. No patient was lost to follow-up at a mean of 4.5 years. In the osteotomy group, the Japanese Orthopedic Association's hip score system score increased from 50.5 (20-89) to 98.9 (95-100) and from 65.9 (48-90) to 99.0 (44-100) in the in-situ pinning group. On the basis of the slip angle, α angle, and epiphyseal-metaphyseal offset, intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy showed a significantly better result in restoring the morphology of the proximal femur than in-situ pinning (P<0.001). The incidences of AVN, chondrolysis, and lower limb discrepancy were similar between the two groups. On the basis of clinical outcomes, both intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy and in-situ pinning had acceptable abilities to treat SCFE. The incidence of AVN was not related to which technique was used. Osteotomy significantly restored the morphology of the proximal femur.

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Review for Pediatricians

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is one of the most common hip pathologies that occurs during adolescence, and its incidence has been increasing over the past decades. For this reason, pediatricians should be aware of this entity to ensure an early diagnosis and intervene in a timely manner. The typical patient with SCFE is an adolescent who is obese presenting with hip pain, but it can also occur in children who are not obese; therefore, SCFE should be part of the differential diagnosis in any skeletally immature patient presenting with hip or knee pain. This article provides an overview for the clinician of relevant aspects of this disease that can lead to serious long-term consequences if not diagnosed and treated appropriately. [Pediatr Ann. 2018;47(9):e377-e380.].

ASMBS pediatric metabolic and bariatric surgery guidelines, 2018

The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Pediatric Committee updated their evidence-based guidelines published in 2012, performing a comprehensive literature search (2009-2017) with 1387 articles and other supporting evidence through February 2018. The significant increase in data supporting the use of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) in adolescents since 2012 strengthens these guidelines from prior reports. Obesity is recognized as a disease; treatment of severe obesity requires a life-long multidisciplinary approach with combinations of lifestyle changes, nutrition, medications, and MBS. We recommend using modern definitions of severe obesity in children with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention age- and sex-matched growth charts defining class II obesity as 120% of the 95th percentile and class III obesity as 140% of the 95th percentile. Adolescents with class II obesity and a co-morbidity (listed in the guidelines), or with class III obesity should be considered for MBS. Adolescents with cognitive disabilities, a history of mental illness or eating disorders that are treated, immature bone growth, or low Tanner stage should not be denied treatment. MBS is safe and effective in adolescents; given the higher risk of adult obesity that develops in childhood, MBS should not be withheld from adolescents when severe co-morbidities, such as depressed health-related quality of life score, type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis exist. Early intervention can reduce the risk of persistent obesity as well as end organ damage from long standing co-morbidities.

Imaging of Pediatric Growth Plate Disturbances

The growth plates, or physes, are visible on virtually all images obtained in skeletally immature children. The proper function of these growth plates depends on an intricate balance between chondrocyte proliferation, which requires nourishment from the epiphyseal vessels, and chondrocyte death, which requires the integrity of the metaphyseal vessels. Therefore, injury to the growth plate (ie, direct insult) or vascular compromise on either side of the growth plate (ie, indirect insult) can cause growth plate dysfunction. Direct growth plate insults occur most commonly with Salter-Harris fractures, and injuries that allow the transphyseal communication of vessels are at a higher risk for subsequent transphyseal bone bridge formation. Indirect insults lead to different sequelae that are based on whether the epiphyseal blood supply or metaphyseal blood supply is compromised. Epiphyseal osteonecrosis can result in slowed longitudinal bone growth, with possible growth plate closure, and is often accompanied by an abnormal secondary ossification center. In contrast, the disruption of metaphyseal blood supply alters endochondral ossification and allows the persistence of chondrocytes within the metaphysis, which appear as focal or diffuse growth plate widening. Imaging remains critical for detecting acute injuries and identifying subsequent growth disturbances. Depending on the imaging findings and patient factors, these growth disturbances may be amenable to conservative or surgical treatment. Therefore, an understanding of the anatomy and physiologic features of the normal growth plate and the associated pathophysiologic conditions can increase diagnostic accuracy, enable radiologists to anticipate future growth disturbances, and ensure optimal imaging, with the ultimate goal of timely and appropriate intervention. ^©RSNA, 2017.