Effectiveness of MicroShunt in Patients with Primary Open-Angle and Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma: A Retrospective European Multicenter Study

Histopathological findings of failed blebs after microinvasive bleb surgery with the XEN Gel Stent and Preserflo MicroShunt

PURPOSE

The success of XEN Gel Stent (XEN) and Preserflo MicroShunt (Preserflo) implantation depends mainly on the development of bleb fibrosis. This study aimed to describe the histological findings of bleb fibrosis after XEN and Preserflo surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with different types of glaucoma who underwent revision surgery after XEN or Preserflo implantation. The available clinical information and histological samples of removed fibrotic tissue were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included. Revision surgery was performed at a median of 195 (range = 31-1264) days after primary surgery. The mean intraocular pressure changed from 29.1 (± 10.3) mmHg at baseline to 18.3 (± 8.7) mmHg (- 37%; p < 0.0001) and 16.2 (± 4.2) mmHg (- 45%; p < 0.0001) after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Histological analysis revealed an increase in activated fibroblasts and macrophages in all specimens and a parallel orientation of fibroblasts in a minor part of the probe in 60% of the specimens. No pronounced inflammatory reaction in the form of lymphocytic or granulocytic infiltration was observed. The comparison of specimens from uveitic glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma patients revealed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The histological analysis of fibrotic blebs from the XEN and Preserflo implants did not show any pronounced immune or foreign-body reaction and revealed a similar histological pattern of failed blebs after trabeculectomy.

Predictive Value of Conjunctival Cytology in Bleb-dependent Glaucoma Surgery

PURPOSE

Metaplasia, chronic inflammation and subconjunctival fibrosis favor failure of bleb-dependent glaucoma surgery. The aim of the study is to identify the patients at a higher risk of post-surgical failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective, open study, performed in the Glaucoma Unit of the Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, from April to November 2021, with a minimum follow-up of one year. 38 eyes with ocular hypertension or chronic open-angle glaucoma were included. All patients underwent preoperative conjunctival sampling in the operating room, under topical or locoregional anesthesia.

PARAMETERS MEASURED

Sex, age, and laterality; number, type and mean time of preoperative drugs use; type of surgery performed; cytology results and degree of metaplasia; percentage of patients in whom the bleb was closed. Evaluation of potential correlation between bleb closure and any of the other variables.

RESULTS

20 women and 18 men participated, with a mean age of 67 years. The mean number of preoperative hypotensive drugs was 2.7. The mean time of use was 90,97 +/- 48,97 months. Most patients had normal cytology, 8% had inflammatory infiltrate and 21% had squamous metaplasia. When relating bleb failure and cytology, we saw that in those who failed surgery, more than half had cytological alterations. A multiple logistic regression was performed, in which we observed that there was statistically significant association (p = .02) between surgical closure and altered cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

According to these results, preoperative conjunctival cytology can help predict those cases with a lower probability of surgical success.

Efficacy, Confounders and Safety of the Preserflo Microshunt

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. We evaluated the efficacy, confounders, and safety of the Preserflo Microshunt over a one-year follow-up period.

METHODS

In this retrospective monocentric study, 111 eyes were evaluated. 83 eyes had primary open angle glaucoma, and 28 eyes secondary open angle glaucoma. Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications, complications, and reoperations were evaluated postoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The influence of age, sex, type of glaucoma, previous surgery and lens status was also analysed. Bleb revision was indicated if corrected IOP exceeded 18 mmHg.

RESULTS

Intraocular pressure significantly decreased from 24.50 ± 8.94 to 14.62 ± 4.86 mmHg (4 - 32 mmHg; p < 0.001), the number of medications from 3.19 ± 1.14 to 0.98 ± 1.39 (0 - 4; p < 0.001). Confounders of interest did not affect efficacy. Bleb revision was performed in 22.5% of eyes and a cyclophotocoagulation was performed in 9.9% of eyes. Complete surgical success (IOP ≤ 17 mmHg, IOP reduction ≥ 20%, without medication) was achieved in 36.9% (n = 41) and qualified success (with medication) in 51.4% (n = 57) of eyes. Transient hypotension (≤ 5 mmHg) occurred in 19.8% after primary implantation and in 1.8% after bleb revision (duration ≤ 3 months).

CONCLUSION

To date, the Preserflo Microshunt has demonstrated good efficacy and a low risk profile.

One-Year Outcomes of Preserflo Microshunt for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PRCIS

This systematic review and meta-analysis concludes that the PreserFlo Microshunt glaucoma drainage device significantly reduces intraocular pressure in primary open angle glaucoma patients at 12 months postinsertion.

PURPOSE

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt (PF-MS) on intraocular pressure (IOP) at 12 months has been conducted.

METHOD

The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Inclusion criteria required a diagnosis of open angle glaucoma, PF-MS insertion, and examination of IOP over time. Meta-analyses were conducted on the primary outcome of IOP and the secondary outcome of glaucoma medication regime. Adverse events were also noted.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified for inclusion in the meta-analyses, of which none had a high risk of bias. The meta-analyses found a significant mean reduction in IOP of 9.07 mm Hg (95% CI: 7.88-10.25; P <0.0001) and a significant mean reduction in mean glaucoma medication requirement of 2.37 medications (95% CI: 2.15-2.60; P <0.0001). Hypotony and hyphaema are common early complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The PF-MS device significantly reduced both IOP and glaucoma medication requirement at 12 months postinsertion in individuals with open angle glaucoma without a significant adverse event burden. Further research is required to determine the economic and environmental effects of widely implementing the PF-MS device into clinical practice.

Minimally invasive bleb surgery versus minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: a 12-month retrospective study

This study aimed to compare the IOP-lowering effectiveness and safety of standalone Preserflo MicroShunt and iStent 1st generation implantation combined with phacoemulsification in Caucasian patients with a 12-month follow-up period. This retrospective study analyzed the medical histories of patients undergoing antiglaucoma surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Bialystok, between January 2019 and January 2022. The main outcome measures were success rates (complete: proportion of eyes with IOP < 18 mmHg (criterion A) and < 15 mmHg (criterion B) or 20% reduction in IOP without any glaucoma medication; qualified: proportion of eyes achieving IOPs < 18 mmHg and < 15 mmHg or 20% reduction in IOP from baseline with or without medications), mean reduction (%) in IOP, medication burden, number of complications and additional interventions. In both groups, a significant decrease in IOP and medication burden were observed at 6 and 12 months when compared with baseline. At 12 months, qualified surgical success in criterion A was recorded in 67.4% and 85.7% of patients in the Preserfo and iStent groups, respectively (p = 0.045). Complete surgical success in criterion B at 12 months accounted to 61.4% of patients from Prserflo group and 32.7% patients in iStent group (p = 0.04). Surgical failure at 12 months was documented in 30.2% and 6.3% of patients, respectively (p = 0.003). There was a significant difference between groups in %IOP reduction after 12 months. Greater reduction was observed in Preserflo group, MD = - 8.41 CI95 [- 15.88; - 0.95], p = 0.028, (- 33.49% ± 21.59 vs - 25.07% ± 14.15 in iStent group). Both procedures effectively reduced IOP and postoperative use of antiglaucoma medications in glaucoma patients.

Intermediate-term impact on corneal endothelial cells and efficacy of Preserflo MicroShunt implantation in patients with open-angle glaucoma - a prospective study over two years

INTRODUCTION

Preserflo MicroShunt is a novel microinvasive bleb forming device for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. The intermediate- and long-term success and the impact of this procedure on corneal endothelial cell density remain to be investigated.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 62 eyes of 55 glaucoma patients (mean age ± SD: 67.0 ± 15.0 years) receiving a Preserflo MicroShunt were included. Corneal endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure and best corrected visual acuity were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively. Success rates, bleb revision rates and complications were analysed. Complete success was defined as an intraocular pressure reduction of ≥ 20% and achieving a target pressure of ≤ 18, ≤ 15 or ≤ 12 mmHg without antiglaucoma medication. Qualified success indicated that the criteria were reached with or without medication.

RESULTS

Corneal endothelial cells showed no significant decline over 24 months (p > 0.05). Intraocular pressure showed a substantial reduction postoperatively (p < 0.001), decreasing from 29.6 ± 8,3 mmHg to 13.0 ± 4.3 mmHg after 24 months (p < 0.001). Complete and qualified success with a target pressure ≤ 15 mmHg was achieved in 52.9% and 54.6% of cases after 24 months, respectively. Best corrected visual acuity did not change after 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Preserflo MicroShunt had no negative side effects on corneal endothelial cells and showed favourable success rates after 2 years in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

PRESERFLO MicroShunt in Severe Myopia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

The PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt (MP; Santen Inc., Osaka, Japan) is a minimally invasive bleb surgery (MIBS) manufactured to treat primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), with lower postoperative adverse effects than with conventional filtering surgeries. We describe here the case study of a 58-year-old woman who presented with bilateral severe myopia with bilateral advanced POAG and unreached target pressure under quadritherapy, who was successfully managed by PM surgery. A review of the literature completes our observation. At presentation, the patient had a spherical equivalent of - 7.50 RE and - 7.75 LE with an IOP of 22 mmHg right and left eye (RLE) under quadritherapy, and with severe bilateral visual field loss, including scotomas within the central 5°. The patient presented with systemic hypertension treated with an antihypertensive drug. Two selective laser trabeculoplasties (SLT), performed 3 months apart, were first tried on the LE, without any change in IOP at 2 months. After considering the high risk of postoperative complications, a PM operation was proposed, with a targeted IOP in the mid-fifteens RLE. The patient's eyes underwent PM surgery with mitomycin C (MMC) MMC0.2 mg/mL for 3 minutes without any complications. The LE required 2 consecutive needlings with 1 mL MMC0.2 mg/mL. At 24 months after surgery, the two eyes gave successful results without the need for any additional medical therapy, and with well-functioning conjunctival blebs. The PM was an effective alternative to the gold standard trabeculectomy in our severely myopic patient. A comparative study between conventional filtering operations and this MIBS in highly myopic patients would confirm our observation.

PRESERFLO™ Microshunt: 1-Year Results of a 25-Gauge vs. 27-Gauge Needle Tract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the PreserFlo™ microshunt (PMS) using a 25-Gauge vs. 27-Gauge needle tract. Methods: This is a prospective postoperative examination of 60 glaucoma eyes that received a PMS. The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma drug score (GDS), Kaplan-Meier success rates, complications, and secondary intervention rates. Two subgroups were formed for data comparison: 27-Gauge (27G), and 25-Gauge (25G). Success was defined as IOP < 18 mmHg together with ≥20% IOP reduction with medication allowed (qualified success = QS18) or not (full success = FS18). Results: IOP and GDS were reduced from baseline to the 1-year study visit as follows: All eyes from 23.4 ± 8.6 mmHg (3.1 ± 0.9) to 15.1 ± 5.9 mmHg (0.8 ± 1.1); 25G from 24.2 ± 7.3 mmHg (3.0 ± 0.8) to 12.7 ± 2.7 mmHg (0.5 ± 0.8); and 27G from 23.1 ± 9.2 mmHg (3.1 ± 1.0) to 16.2 ± 6.7 mmHg (0.9 ± 1.2). IOP at one year was lower in the 25G group compared to the 27G group (p = 0.035). Bleb needling was required in eight (13.3%) eyes and open bleb revisions in three (5.0%). Transient hypotony occurred in 21% and choroidal effusion in 8% of all eyes. Choroidal effusions were more frequent in the 25G group (21%) compared to the 27G group (2%, p = 0.031). One-year success rates were significantly higher in the 25G group compared to the 27G group for both QS18 (25G: 67.9% vs. 27G: 35.7%, p = 0.002) and FS18 (25G: 63.6% vs. 27G: 29.2%, p = 0.007). Conclusions: The PreserFlo microshunt is an effective and safe glaucoma surgery with a low rate of bleb revisions or needlings. We show that the 25G needle tract might be more efficient for IOP control at the cost of increased IOP-related complications compared to 27G.

Preserflo TM MicroShunt implantation combined with Ologen TM in primary and secondary glaucoma patients in a clinical setting

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of combining the Preserflo™ MicroShunt implant (MicroShunt) with a simultaneous Ologen™ implant in patients with glaucoma.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma who underwent MicroShunt + Ologen implantation as a standalone procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification (combined procedure). Success was defined as achieving an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 6-15 mmHg at 18 months post surgery, with a preoperative IOP reduction of at least 20%, and without (complete success) or with (qualified success) the need for antiglaucoma medications. The primary endpoint was the success rate.

RESULTS

Forty-eight eyes from 47 patients were included, with 28 eyes (58.3%) undergoing the standalone procedure and 20 eyes (41.7%) undergoing the combined procedure. Overall, there was a significant reduction in preoperative IOP from 19.7 ± 5.8 mmHg to 11.4 ± 2.6 mmHg at 18 months ( P < 0.0001). In the standalone procedure group, preoperative IOP decreased from 21.5 ± 5.2 mmHg to 11.7 ± 2.5 mmHg ( P < 0.0001), and in the combined procedure group, preoperative IOP decreased from 17.1 ± 5.8 mmHg to 10.9 ± 2.7 mmHg ( P = 0.0002), with no significant difference between the two groups regarding final IOP. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications significantly decreased from 3.2 ± 1.1 to 0.3 ± 0.7 in the overall study population ( P < 0.0001). At 18 months, 40 eyes (83.3%) were classified as successful. Regarding safety, out of the total number of eyes, two (4.2%) experienced choroidal detachment without visual impairment, two (4.2%) had transient hyphema, one (2.1%) showed reactivation of a corneal herpetic ulcer, one (2.1%) had diplopia, and one (2.1%) exhibited a shallow anterior chamber during the first week.

CONCLUSION

The combination of Ologen™ and Preserflo™ MicroShunt, either alone or in conjunction with phacoemulsification, demonstrated a favorable profile in terms of IOP reduction and safety.

Risk Factors for Failure in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Microshunt Implantation

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for failure of Microshunt in glaucoma patients.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The study included 220 eyes from 220 consecutive glaucoma patients undergoing Microshunt implantation at six glaucoma units. Four intraocular pressure (IOP) success criteria were defined: (A) IOP ≤21 mm Hg with ≥20% IOP reduction; (B) IOP ≤18 mm Hg with ≥20% IOP reduction; (C) IOP ≤15 mm Hg with ≥25% IOP reduction; and (D) IOP ≤12 mm Hg with ≥30% IOP reduction from baseline. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate success rates according to the criteria above, and multivariable Cox models were used to identified risk factors for failure according to criterion A.

RESULTS

Success rates varied based on different criteria, ranging from 43.3% to 62.5% (overall success for criteria D and A, respectively) and from 35.3% to 44.4% (complete success for criteria D and A, respectively) at 1-year follow-up. Higher intraoperative MMC concentration was associated with reduced risk of failure to maintain complete (0.4 vs 0.2 mg/mL: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.441, P < .001) and overall (0.4 vs 0.2 mg/mL: HR = 0.360, P = .004) success. For complete success, other risk factors for failure were pseudoexfoliation glaucoma/pigmentary glaucoma (HR = 1.641, P = .004), primary angle closure glaucoma (HR = 1.611, P < .001), and previous non-glaucomatous ocular surgeries (HR = 2.301, P = .002). For overall success, other risk factors for failure were lower preoperative IOP (for 1-mm Hg increase, HR = 0.934, P = .005), higher number of preoperative antiglaucoma agents (HR = 1.626, P < .001), and Microshunt combined with cataract surgery (HR = 1.526, P = .033).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified risk factors for Microshunt failure, highlighting the importance of high intraoperative MMC dose and careful patient selection to optimize surgical success.

Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Two-Year Results from a Randomized, Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of the MicroShunt (Santen Inc) versus trabeculectomy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial conducted in the United States and Europe.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients (aged 40-85 years) with mild to severe POAG inadequately controlled on maximum tolerated medical therapy and intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 15 mmHg and ≤ 40 mmHg.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 3:1 to stand-alone MicroShunt implantation (n = 395) or trabeculectomy (n = 132), both augmented with mitomycin C (MMC) 0.2 mg/ml for 2 minutes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary effectiveness end point was surgical success, defined as ≥ 20% reduction in mean diurnal IOP from baseline with no increase in glaucoma medications. Secondary end points included changes in mean IOP and medication use from baseline and the need for postoperative interventions.

RESULTS

At 2 years, the rate of surgical success was lower in the MicroShunt group than in the trabeculectomy group (50.6% vs. 64.4%, P = 0.005). Mean diurnal IOP was reduced from 21.1 ± 4.9 mmHg at baseline to 13.9 ± 3.9 mmHg at 24 months in the MicroShunt group and from 21.1 ± 5.0 mmHg at baseline to 10.7 ± 3.7 mmHg at 24 months in the trabeculectomy group (P < 0.001 compared with baseline in both groups). Mean medication use decreased from 3.1 to 0.9 in the MicroShunt group and from 2.9 to 0.4 in the trabeculectomy group (P < 0.001 compared with baseline in both groups). Adverse events at 2 years were generally similar in the 2 groups, except that hypotony was more common in eyes undergoing trabeculectomy (51.1% vs. 30.9%, P < 0.001). Repositioning or explantation of the implant occurred in 6.8% of MicroShunt patients. The majority of these patients had device removal at the time of subsequent glaucoma surgery. Vision-threatening complications were uncommon in both groups.

CONCLUSION

At 2 years, both the MicroShunt and trabeculectomy provided significant reductions in IOP and medication use, with trabeculectomy continuing to have greater surgical success.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges

The development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) was intended to provide safe and modestly efficacious modalities for early intervention of mild-to-moderate glaucoma, with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. They were mainly ab interno procedures that reduce intraocular pressure by facilitating the aqueous outflow by bypassing the trabecular meshwork resistance, reinforcing the uveoscleral flow via the supraciliary space, and reducing aqueous production by the ciliary body. While the cumulating evidence helps shape the role of the available MIGS, the exponential new development and advancement in this field has expanded the territory of MIGS. Apart from developing subconjunctival MIGS filtration devices (Xen gel stent and PRESERFLO MicroShunt), there is a tendency to revisit the "traditional" MIGS for alternative use and to modify the procedures with consideration of the fundamental aqueous outflow physiology. Combined MIGS has also been suggested, based on the theory that their different mechanisms may provide additive or synergistic effects. The advancement of laser procedures is also promising and could supplement unmet needs along the glaucoma treatment algorithm. This review examines the broad array of MIGS, updates the recent findings, discusses their potential alternative applications, and explores future challenges.

[Real-world outcomes of glaucoma surgical procedures for open-angle glaucoma]

This article provides an overview of real-world outcomes in glaucoma surgical procedures. While randomized clinical trials provide valuable insights, they do not fully reflect real-world clinical practice. Real-world studies enable the evaluation of outcomes in uncontrolled settings and play a crucial role in counselling and decision-making for glaucoma treatment. By examining real-world data the article aims to identify rare adverse events that may go unnoticed in controlled clinical trials. The focus is on assessing the effectiveness and safety of glaucoma surgical procedures beyond the controlled trial setting.

PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) after one year.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Institutional prospective interventional cohort study comparing eyes with POAG, which had received the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy. The MicroShunt group was matched with the trabeculectomy group for age, known duration of disease, and number and classes of intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering medications to have similar conjunctival conditions. The study is part of the Dresden Glaucoma and Treatment Study, using a uniform study design, with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, follow-ups and standardized definitions of success and failure for both procedures.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

mean diurnal IOP (mdIOP, mean of 6 measurements), peak IOP, and IOP fluctuations.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

success rates, number of IOP lowering medications, visual acuity, visual fields, complications, surgical interventions, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty eyes of 60 patients, 30 in each group, were analyzed after 1-year follow-ups. Median [Q25, Q75] mdIOP (mmHg) dropped from 16.2 [13.8-21.5] to 10.5 [8.9-13.5] in the MicroShunt and from 17.6 [15.6-24.0] to 11.1 [9.5-12.3] in the trabeculectomy group, both without glaucoma medications. Reduction of mdIOP (P = .596), peak IOP (P = .702), and IOP fluctuations (P = .528) was not statistically significantly different between groups. The rate of interventions was statistically significantly higher in the trabeculectomy group, especially in the early postoperative period (P = .018). None of the patients experienced severe adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Both procedures are equally effective and safe in lowering mdIOP, peak IOP and IOP fluctuations in patients with POAG, one year after surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02959242.

Ocular surface and glaucoma, a mutual relationship. Practical suggestions for classification and management

The chronic use of glaucoma medications could improve the development of an ocular comorbidity, the glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease. This could be related to the exposure of the conjunctiva to preservatives, but also active compounds such as prostaglandin analogues may improve the risk of ocular surface inflammation. Inflammation has a negative impact on tolerability and adherence to eyedrops and to the outcome of filtration surgery as well. A stratification of glaucoma patients based not only on visual field progression but also on glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease would be desirable for a strategic management. Early diagnosis, individualized treatment, and safe surgical management should be the hallmarks of glaucoma treatment. One of the main issues for the proper and successful management of patients is the right timing, effectiveness and safety for both medical and surgical treatment options leading to a precision medicine in glaucoma disease as the best modern treatment.

One-Year Outcomes of PreserfloTM MicroShunt Implantation versus Trabeculectomy for Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma

This retrospective, single-center study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Preserflo^TM MicroShunt (MicroShunt) implantations compared to trabeculectomies (TETs) in patients diagnosed with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEXG). A total of 31 eyes from 28 patients received a MicroShunt implantation, and 29 eyes from 26 patients received a TET. Surgical success was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) between 5 mmHg and 17 mmHg at the end of the follow-up period, no need for surgical revisions or secondary glaucoma surgery, and no loss of light perception. In the MicroShunt group, the mean IOP dropped from 20.8 ± 5.9 mmHg at baseline to 12.4 ± 2.8 mmHg (p < 0.0001) after one year. In the TET group, the mean IOP dropped from 22.3 ± 6.5 mmHg to 11.1 ± 3.7 mmHg (p < 0.0001) after 12 months. In both of the groups, the mean number of medications was reduced significantly (MicroShunt from 2.7 ± 1.2 to 0.2 ± 0.7; p < 0.0001 vs. TET from 2.9 ± 1.2 to 0.3 ± 0.9; p < 0.0001). Considering the success rates, 83.9% of the MicroShunt eyes achieved complete success, and 90.3% qualified for success at the end of the follow-up period. In the TET group, the rates were 82.8% and 93.1%, respectively. The postoperative complications were comparable between both groups. In conclusion, the MicroShunt implantation demonstrated non-inferiority regarding its efficacy and safety profile compared to TET in PEXG at a follow-up of one year.

[Comparison of new and old procedures in glaucoma surgery : Trabeculectomy, Preserflo and XEN]

Glaucoma is one of the most frequent causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. The main risk factor of the disease is an individually too high intraocular pressure and pressure reduction is still the only established treatment. If conservative pressure reduction and adherence are insufficient, and if the patient is unable to tolerate conservative treatment, surgical procedures become necessary. There are nowadays more than a dozen different surgical procedures for lowering the pressure. This article presents and discusses the procedures that have a subconjunctival pre-equatorial drainage in common. These include trabeculectomy, the XEN-gel implant and the Preserflo microshunt.

Risk factors and management of choroidal effusions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Choroidal effusions are recognized as a common early postoperative complication of glaucoma surgery, and although often benign, they may cause significant ocular morbidity. This article aims to summarize current research on the risk factors and management of choroidal effusions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation and trabeculectomy are the most commonly performed surgeries for the management of moderate to severe glaucoma. Common postoperative complications of these procedures include hypotony and the development of choroidal effusions. Choroidal effusions have recently been associated with the oral administration of certain drugs, including select monoclonal antibody, antiseizure and bisphosphonate medications. Risk factors for effusion development include specific patient characteristics such as pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, older age and hypertension. Although choroidal effusions typically resolve with medical therapy alone, surgical intervention may be required. Various methods of surgical intervention, such as surgical drainage or GDD tube ligation, can be utilized to treat choroidal effusions when conservative management with medical treatment fails, but themselves carry alternative risks that must be considered.

SUMMARY

Minimizing the incidence and duration of hypotony following ophthalmic surgery and careful monitoring of patients starting certain oral medications are important in limiting the occurrence of choroidal effusions. Risk factors for choroidal effusions have been recently identified in the literature. A better understanding of these risk factors, as well as the outcomes of choroidal effusion management, can help to reduce the occurrence of effusions overall and minimize ocular morbidity.

The PreserFlo MicroShunt in the Context of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Narrative Review

Recently, the quest for novel glaucoma surgical techniques and devices has been underway. Trabeculectomy remains the gold standard, but it requires the implantation of glaucoma drainage devices and frequent follow-ups, and it also carries a high risk of serious complications. The need for less invasive and safer procedures has led to the development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), particularly for patients with mild-to-moderate disease. Among them, minimally invasive bleb surgery seems to be effective in classical glaucoma surgery, while maintaining MIGS benefits. The relatively new PreserFlo® MicroShunt (Santen, Osaka, Japan) is registered in Europe. It was released in 2019 for the treatment of patients with early-to-advanced open-angle glaucoma, where intraocular pressure (IOP) remains uncontrolled while on maximum tolerated medication and/or where glaucoma progression warrants surgery. This review focuses on the place of the PreserFlo MicroShunt, characterized by ab externo implantation, among MIGS procedures, discussing its advantages and disadvantages. The mechanisms of action, technical aspects, efficacy, and safety issues are summarized. The surgical technique, its efficacy, and safety profile are described, and directions for future studies are indicated. The PreserFlo MicroShunt ensures a high safety profile, minimal anatomical disruption, meaningful IOP-lowering effect, and ease of use for patients and physicians.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MicroShunt implantation versus standard trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma (a SIGHT study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Trabeculectomy is the "gold standard" initial surgical procedure for open-angle glaucoma worldwide. During the last decade, the introduction of less invasive procedures, including new bleb-forming surgery such as the MicroShunt, has altered the approach of glaucoma management. At present, there is insufficient evidence comparing the effectiveness between these procedures nor versus trabeculectomy. Furthermore, there is no data available on patient impact and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to address this gap in evidence and establish whether MicroShunt implantation is non-inferior compared to trabeculectomy with regard to effectiveness and whether it is cost-effective.

METHODS

A multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (RCT) studying open-angle glaucoma with an indication for surgery will be conducted. Patients with previous ocular surgery except for phacoemulsification are excluded, as are patients with ocular comorbidity compromising the visual field or requiring a combined procedure. After informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention, a PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt implantation, or the control group, trabeculectomy, using block randomisation (blocks of 2, 4 or 6 patients). In total, 124 patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre. The primary endpoint will be intraocular pressure (IOP) one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include IOP-lowering medication use, treatment failure, visual acuity, visual field progression, additional interventions, adverse events, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and cost-effectiveness. Study outcomes will be measured up to 12 months postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

This study protocol describes the design of a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. To this date, cost-effectiveness studies evaluating the MicroShunt have not been undertaken. This multicentre RCT will provide more insight into whether MicroShunt implantation is non-inferior compared to standard trabeculectomy regarding postoperative IOP and whether MicroShunt implantation is cost-effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03931564 , Registered 30 April 2019.

Efficacy of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature

Background: Recent studies on the PRESERFLO MicroShunt suggest that it may be effective in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP); however, the number of studies on this device remains limited. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt in patients with glaucoma and performed a meta-analysis of published results. Methods: Prospective study including all patients that underwent PRESERFLO MicroShunt surgery from 2018 onwards. Sub-analyses were performed for cataract-combined procedures. To compare our results, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. IOP, IOP-lowering medication and surgical complications reported in the retrieved studies were assessed. Results: A total of 72 eyes underwent PRESERFLO-implant surgery (59 as standalone procedure and 13 as cataract-combined procedure). No significant differences were found in IOP and IOP-lowering medication between both groups. The mean ± standard deviation IOP and IOP-lowering medications of both groups taken together declined from 21.72 ± 8.35 to 15.92 ± 8.54 mmHg (p < 0.001, 26.7% reduction) and 3.40 to 0.93 (p < 0.001, 72.6% reduction) at 1 year follow-up, respectively. Secondary surgeries were required in 19.4% of eyes, the majority (71.4%) within 6 months. The meta-analysis including 14 studies (totaling 1213 PRESERFLO MicroShunt surgeries) from the systematic review showed a mean preoperative IOP and IOP-lowering medication of 22.28 ± 5.38 and 2.97 ± 1.07, respectively. The three-years postoperative pooled mean was (weighted mean difference, 95% CI) 11.07 (10.27 [8.23−12.32], p < 0.001) mmHg and 0.91 (1.77 [1.26−2.28], p < 0.001) for IOP and IOP-lowering medication, respectively. The most common reported complication was hypotony (2−39%). Conclusion: The PRESERFLO MicroShunt is effective and safe in lowering IOP and the number of IOP-lowering medications.

Early Complications and Results of Preserflo MicroShunt in the Management of Uncontrolled Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Case Series

We analyze the surgical outcomes and early complications with their management of the Preserflo MicroShunt (Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) at six-month follow-up. The study is conducted between March 2021 and May 2022. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logMAR, intraocular pressure (IOP), and changes in glaucoma medications are assessed. Thirty eyes of 30 patients (22 women [73.3%] and 8 men [26.7%]) are included. They are augmented with mitomycin C (MMC) 0.5 mg/mL (8 subjects) or MMC 0.2 mg/mL (22 subjects) intraoperatively. BCVA is significantly higher one day after the treatment than before the treatment (MD with 95% CI = 0.05 (<0.01; 0.30); p = 0.045) when analyzing all patients. Such dependency is not observed when analyzing only patients treated with MMC 0.2 or 0.5 mg/mL (p > 0.050 for both analyses). No other statistically significant differences are detected in the level of BCVA before and after treatment. Among the patients, overall IOP is significantly lower at each time point after treatment than before surgery (p < 0.001 for all analyses). Among patients augmented with MMC 0.2 mg/mL, the IOP level is also significantly lower at each time point after treatment than before treatment (p ≤ 0.001 for all analyses). The same differences are observed among patients with MMC = 0.5—the IOP level is significantly lower at each time point after treatment than before treatment (p < 0.050 for all analyses). Five subjects (16.7%) require anti-glaucoma medications three months after the procedure. Early complications (hypotony, choroidal effusion, keratitis, hyphema, and bleb fibrosis) are observed in 46.7% of cases. Our early results show that Preserflo MicroShunt is safe and effective for lowering IOP; however, it is not free from transient complications.

Evaluation of a Novel Αb Εxterno MicroShunt for the Treatment of Glaucoma

The surgical management of glaucoma has been revolutionized by the introduction of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). The various MIGS options aim to meaningfully lower intraocular pressure with a better safety profile than traditional glaucoma surgery. The key clinical attributes and the emerging potential of an ab externo MicroShunt (PreserFlo™) are reviewed in the context of published evidence and clinical experience. This novel MicroShunt consists of an 8.5-mm-long tube that is implanted in the eye via an ab externo approach enabling aqueous humor drainage into the sub-Tenon’s space through the formation of a bleb, similar in appearance to that created by trabeculectomy. The efficacy and safety of this procedure, the concomitant use of antimetabolites, the impact of tube positioning, and its future value in clinical practice are critically reviewed. Recent evidence has demonstrated the MicroShunt to be less effective than traditional filtration surgery, but with a significant improvement in safety. Cumulative data suggest that the new implant provides tangible clinical benefits to selected patients with glaucoma in need of further intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering. Future research should delineate the precise role of this and other MIGS options in the rapidly evolving glaucoma treatment algorithm.

Efficacy and Safety of the Preserflo Microshunt With Mitomycin C for the Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma

PRCIS

The Preserflo Microshunt (PSM) is a safe and effective glaucoma microfiltering implant that significantly reduces the intraocular pressure (IOP), either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, during the first year after surgery.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the PSM for the treatment of open angle glaucoma with 0.2 mg/mL mitomycin C, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective, open-label study of 64 eyes with primary open angle glaucoma that underwent PSM implantation and were followed up for at least 9 months. Success was defined as IOP 6-17 mm Hg and a reduction of at least 20%, complete without hypotensive medication, and qualified with medication. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included mean hypotensive medications, visual acuity, and incidence of needling and surgical revision.

RESULTS

A total of 51 eyes underwent PSM alone and 13 underwent PSM+phacoemulsification. In the overall population of the study, the mean IOP was significantly reduced from 22.03±0.7 mm Hg at baseline to 12.7±0.4 mm Hg at the final visit, P <0.0001 (mean follow-up: 11±1.4 mo). The IOP was significantly reduced in both groups ( P <0.0001). Ocular hypotensive medication was reduced significantly from 2.7±0.7 to 0.2±0.5 ( P <0.0001). No significant differences were found in IOP-lowering medication between groups (PSM alone, 0.2±0.08; PSM+phacoemulsification, 0.1±0.1; P =0.2). At the final visit, 70.3% were considered as complete success and 12.5% as qualified success. The most common adverse event was clinical hypotony (7.8%) followed by hyphema (4.7%), and anterior chamber reformation (1.6%). Overall, 1.6% required needling and 15.6% surgical revision to restore the flow.

CONCLUSION

Glaucoma surgery with the PSM and mitomycin C was efficacious and safe in the short term, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery, and may be considered a surgical option for lowering IOP in primary open angle glaucoma.

Iris Obstruction Following PRESERFLO™ Microshunt Implantation and Surgical Management

PURPOSE

To present a case of lumen obstruction after implantation of microshunt with subconjunctival drainage and subsequent management.

CASE REPORT

A 56-year-old male with primary open angle glaucoma underwent uneventful PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt implantation in both eyes. Five months after surgery the patient presented with an intraocular pressure of 26▒mmHg in the right eye due to iris obstruction.

RESULTS

The iris fibers were severed and removed surgically to free the lumen. Follow-up showed a normalised intraocular pressure of 10▒mmHg and a free lumen.

CONCLUSION

Uncontrolled intraocular pressure due to iris obstruction following PRESERFLO™ Microshunt was addressed by surgical removal of iris fibers at the lumen entrance without the need for tube repositioning.

A New and Easier Approach to Preserflo MicroShunt Implantation

PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt is a new minimally invasive glaucoma surgical (MIGS) device, implanted with an ab externo approach, which drains the aqueous humor to the subconjunctival space. It has been designed as a safer and less invasive approach for treating medically uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. The classic way of MicroShunt implantation involves different key steps, which includes creating a small scleral pocket with a 1mm blade; passing a 25-gauge (25G) needle through the scleral pocket into the anterior chamber (AC); and subsequently flushing the stent with a 23-gauge (23G) thin-wall cannula. However, sliding the needle into the scleral pocket can create false passages, thus making the device’s threading more difficult. The purpose of the current paper is to propose a simplified implantation approach. Our method proposes to make the scleral tunnel by using directly the 25G needle and, at the limbus, this 25G needle is used to slightly depress the sclera and enter into the AC. The MicroShunt is subsequently assembled on a 23G cannula mounted on a 1mL syringe. The syringe can then be used to flush the device. Outflow can thus be confirmed immediately by seeing drops of aqueous humor leaking from the external opening of the stent. This new approach may have different potential advantages, such as better control of the site of entry, avoids wrong passages, reduces or eliminates the risk of aqueous humor sideway flow, facilitates a parallel path to the iris plane, and it is faster.

Conjunctival erosion following a PRESERFLO® MicroShunt procedure

Purpose

We describe a case of conjunctival erosion following a PRESERFLO® MicroShunt procedure, and the subsequent revision surgery.

Observations

Conjunctival erosion was noted overlying the MicroShunt implant at postoperative week 11, 8 weeks following a bleb needling procedure for bleb encapsulation. A brisk leak was observed at the site of erosion. The patient underwent a subsequent revision procedure with repositioning of the MicroShunt implant and mitomycin C (MMC) application.

Conclusion and importance

Conjunctival erosion may be a relatively rare but important complication following MicroShunt surgery and may arise from a variety of risk factors. Extra care should be taken during bleb needling in the context of MicroShunt, and needling should be directed posteriorly, beyond the distal tip of the MicroShunt.

PreserFlo® MicroShunt: An Overview of This Minimally Invasive Device for Open-Angle Glaucoma

For moderate-to-severe glaucoma, trabeculectomy remains the “gold standard” intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering treatment; nonetheless, this method requires extensive post-operative maintenance. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) treatments are designed to lessen intra- and post-operative care burden while offering an acceptable IOP decrease for individuals with mild to moderate glaucoma. The PreserFlo® MicroShunt (previously InnFocus MicroShunt) is an 8.5 mm glaucoma drainage device manufactured from poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) (SIBS), an extremely biocompatible and bioinert material. The lumen is narrow enough to prevent hypotony, but big enough to avoid being obstructed by sloughed cells or pigment. The device is implanted ab externo, as a stand-alone procedure or in conjunction with cataract surgery, with intraoperative mitomycin C, and a bleb is produced under the conjunctiva and Tenon’s capsule. The MicroShunt was CE-marked in 2012 and designed for primary open-angle glaucoma, the IOP of which remains uncontrolled after maximally tolerated topical treatment. Several clinical trials evaluating the MicroShunt’s long-term safety and effectiveness have been conducted, highlighting the effectiveness of the device over time, along with a tolerable safety profile. The present review aims to gather evidence of PreserFlo’s effectiveness and safety results almost 10 years after its introduction, and furthermore, to compare it with other MIGS and with the gold-standard trabeculectomy for glaucoma management.