m6A-induced repression of SIAH1 facilitates alternative splicing of androgen receptor variant 7 by regulating CPSF1

Maternal methylosome protein 50 is essential for embryonic development in medaka Oryzias latipes

Methylosome protein 50 (Mep50) is a protein that is rich in WD40 domains, which mediate and regulate a variety of physiological processes in organisms. Previous studies indicated the necessity of Mep50 in embryogenesis in mice Mus musculus and fish. This study aimed to further understand the roles of maternal Mep50 in early embryogenesis using medaka Oryzias latipes as a model. Without maternal Mep50, medaka zygotes developed to the pre-early gastrula stage but died later. The transcriptome of the embryos at the pre-early gastrula stage was analyzed by RNA sequencing. The results indicated that 1572 genes were significantly upregulated and 741 genes were significantly downregulated in the embryos without maternal Mep50. In the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), the DNA-binding proteins, such as histones and members of the small chromosome maintenance complex, were enriched. The major interfered regulatory networks in the embryos losing maternal Mep50 included DNA replication and cell cycle regulation, AP-1 transcription factors such as Jun and Fos, the Wnt pathway, RNA processing, and the extracellular matrix. Quantitative RT-PCR verified 16 DEGs, including prmt5, H2A, cpsf, jun, mcm4, myc, p21, ccne2, cdk6, and col1, among others. It was speculated that the absence of maternal Mep50 could potentially lead to errors in DNA replication and cell cycle arrest, ultimately resulting in cell apoptosis. This eventually resulted in the failure of gastrulation and embryonic death. The results indicate the importance of maternal Mep50 in early embryonic development, particularly in medaka fish.

The functions and mechanisms of RNA modification in prostate: Current status and future perspectives

The increasing incidence and mortality of prostate cancer worldwide significantly impact the life span of male patients, emphasizing the urgency of understanding its pathogenic mechanism and associated molecular changes that regulate tumor progression for effective prevention and treatment. RNA modification, an important post-transcriptional regulatory process, profoundly influences tumor cell growth and metabolism, shaping cell fate. Over 170 RNA modification methods are known, with prominent research focusing on N6-methyladenosine, N7-methylguanosine, N1-methyladenosine, 5-methylcytidine, pseudouridine, and N4-acetylcytidine modifications. These alterations intricately regulate coding and non-coding RNA post-transcriptionally, affecting the stability of RNA and protein expression levels. This article delves into the latest advancements and challenges associated with various RNA modifications in prostate cancer tumor cells, tumor microenvironment, and core signaling molecule androgen receptors. It aims to provide new research targets and avenues for molecular diagnosis, treatment strategies, and improvement of the prognosis in prostate cancer.

RNA N6-methyladenosine-modified-binding protein YTHDF1 promotes prostate cancer progression by regulating androgen function-related gene TRIM68

PURPOSE

There is no report about the direct relationship between m6A modification and androgen receptor (AR)-related genes in prostate cancer (PC). We aimed to study the mechanisms of m6A methylation in regulating the pathogenesis of PC from the perspective of AR-related genes.

METHODS

qRT-PCR was applied to detect the expression of m6A-related genes in PC cell with or without AR inhibitor. The effects of YTHDF1 knockdown on PC cell viability, apoptosis, migration and invasion were investigated using flow cytometry, wound healing and transwell assays, respectively. The mechanism of YTHDF1 action was investigated using m6A RNA immunoprecipitation (MeRIP) sequencing. The biological functions of YTHDF1 were also explored through in vivo experiments.

RESULTS

YTHDF1 was significantly down-regulated in AR inhibitor group. YTHDF1 knockdown significantly decreased AR level, viability and m6A methylation level of PC cells. TRIM68 was identified as a direct target of YTHDF1. Both YTHDF1 and TRIM68 knockdown increased apoptosis, and decreased cell viability, migration, and invasion of PC cells, while TRIM68 overexpression reversed the effects of YTHDF1 knockdown on PC cells. In addition, knockdown of YTHDF1 or TRIM68 significantly decreased the m6A methylation level, and mRNA and protein levels of YTHDF1, TRIM68 and AR in PC cells, while TRIM68 overexpression increased the expression levels above. Furthermore, subcutaneous xenografts of nude mice also revealed that TRIM68 could reverse the effects of YTHDF1 knockdown in PC in vivo.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested the key role of YTHDF1-mediated m6A modification in PC progression by regulating androgen function-related gene TRIM68 in PC.

The functional roles of m6A modification in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent malignancy of the male genitourinary system, and its etiology suggests that genetics is an essential risk factor for its development and progression, while exogenous factors may have an significant impact on this risk. Initial diagnosis of advanced PCa is relatively frequent, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the predominant standard of care for PCa and the basis for various novel combination therapy regimens, and is often required throughout the patient's subsequent treatment. Although diagnostic modalities and treatment options are evolving, some patients suffer from complications, including biochemical relapse, metastasis and treatment resistance. Mechanisms of PCa pathogenesis and progression have been the focus of research. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is an RNA modification involved in cell physiology and tumor metabolism. It has been observed to affect the evolution of diverse cancers through the regulation of gene expression. Genes associated with m6A are prominent in PCa and are involved in multiple aspects of desmoresistant PCa occurrence, progression, PCa bone metastasis (BM), and treatment resistance. Here, we explore the role of m6A modifications in promoting PCa.

Proteomics analysis of carotid body tumor revealed potential mechanisms and molecular differences among Shamblin classifications

Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are a rare type of paraganglioma, and surgical resection is the only effective treatment. Because of the proximity of CBTs to the carotid artery, jugular vein, and cranial nerve, surgery is extremely difficult, with high risks of hemorrhage and neurovascular injury. The Shamblin classification is used for CBT clinical evaluation; however, molecular mechanisms underlying classification differences remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate pathogenic mechanisms and molecular differences between CBT types. In Shamblin I, II, and III tumors, differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified using direct data-independent acquisition (DIA). DEPs were validated using immunohistochemistry. Proteomics profiling of three Shamblin subtypes differed significantly. Bioinformatics analysis showed that adrenomedullin signaling, protein kinase A signaling, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling, ephrin receptor signaling, gap junction signaling, interleukin (IL)-1 signaling, actin cytoskeleton signaling, endothelin-1 signaling, angiopoietin signaling, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) signaling, and IL-6 signaling pathways were significantly enriched. Furthermore, 60 DEPs changed significantly with tumor progression. Immunohistochemistry validated several important DEPs, including aldehyde oxidase 1 (AOX1), mediator complex subunit 22 (MED22), carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPT1A), and heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1). To our knowledge, this is the first application of proteomics quantification in CBT. Our results will deepen the understanding of CBT-related pathogenesis and aid in identifying therapeutic targets for CBT treatment.

RNA m6A modification in prostate cancer: A new weapon for its diagnosis and therapy

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in men worldwide. Despite significant advances in PCa therapy, the underlying molecular mechanisms have yet to be fully elucidated. Recently, epigenetic modification has emerged as a key player in tumor progression, and RNA-based N6-methyladenosine (m6A) epigenetic modification was found to be crucial. This review summarizes comprehensive state-of-art mechanisms underlying m6A modification, its implication in the pathogenesis, and advancement of PCa in protein-coding and non-coding RNA contexts, its relevance to PCa immunotherapy, and the ongoing clinical trials for PCa treatment. This review presents potential m6A-based targets and paves a new avenue for diagnosing and treating PCa, providing new guidelines for future related research through a systematic review of previous results.

RNA modification writers pattern in relation to tumor microenvironment and prognosis in prostate cancer

Background: RNA modifications are important in the study of epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in immune responses and tumorigenesis. When RNA writers are mutated or disrupted in expression, the genes associated with the pathways they modify are also disrupted and can activate or repress related pathways, affecting tumorigenesis and progression. However, the potential role of RNA writers in prostate cancer is unclear. Methods: Based on data from three datasets, we describe 26 RNA writers that mediate gene expression and genetic mutation in prostate cancer and assess their expression patterns in 948 prostate cancer samples. Using principal component analysis algorithms, the RM Score was developed to quantify the RNA modification patterns of specific tumors. Results: Two different categories were determined by unsupervised clustering methods, and survival analysis showed significant differences in OS prognosis between these two categories. Differentially expressed genes between the different categories were detected and the RNA writers-mediated scoring model RM_Score were constructed based on this. Also, the RM_Score was analyzed in relation to clinical characteristics, immune infiltration level, drug response, and efficacy of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Those results confirm that multilayer alterations in epitope-modified RNA writers are associated with patient prognosis and with immune cell infiltration characteristics. Finally, we examined differentially expressed mRNA, lncRNA and miRNA between high and low RM_Score groups, based on which a ceRNA regulatory network was constructed. Conclusion: This work is a comprehensive analysis of modified writers in prostate cancer and identified them to have a role in chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Stem Cells as Target for Prostate cancer Therapy: Opportunities and Challenges

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) and cells in a cancer stem cell-like (CSCL) state have proven to be responsible for tumor initiation, growth, and relapse in Prostate Cancer (PCa) and other cancers; therefore, new strategies are being developed to target such cellular populations. TLR3 activation-based immunotherapy using Polyinosinic:Polycytidylic acid (PIC) has been proposed to be used as a concomitant strategy to first-line treatment. This strategy is based on the induction of apoptosis and an inflammatory response in tumor cells. In combination with retinoids like 9cRA, this treatment can induce CSCs differentiation and apoptosis. A limitation in the use of this combination is the common decreased expression of TLR3 and its main positive regulator p53. observed in many patients suffering of different cancer types such as PCa. Importantly, human exposure to certain toxicants, such as iAs, not only has proven to enrich CSCs population in an in vitro model of human epithelial prostate cells, but additionally, it can also lead to a decreased p53, TLR3 and RA receptor (RARβ), expression/activation and thus hinder this treatment efficacy. Therefore, here we point out the relevance of evaluating the TLR3 and P53 status in PCa patients before starting an immunotherapy based on the use of PIC +9cRA to determine whether they will be responsive to treatment. Additionally, the use of strategies to overcome the lower TLR3, RARβ or p53 expression in PCa patients, like the inclusion of drugs that increase p53 expression, is encouraged, to potentiate the use of PIC+RA based immunotherapy in these patients.