1
|
Watane A, Patel M, Yannuzzi NA, Kombo N, Sridhar J. Trends in Immunosuppressive Agent Use for Non-Infectious Uveitis by US Ophthalmologists in Medicare Beneficiaries and Association with Physician-Industry Interactions. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2024; 32:1614-1620. [PMID: 37917798 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2023.2272171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the trends of immunosuppressive drug use for non-infectious uveitis and explore their relationship with industry payments. METHODS A retrospective review of ophthalmologists reimbursed by Medicare for the administration of adalimumab (ADA), repository corticotropin (RCI), methotrexate (MTX), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) between 2014 and 2018. RESULTS A total of 316 ophthalmologists were reimbursed by Medicare for 1567 ADA, 465 RCI, 1752 MTX, and 12 333 MMF administrations. The number and dollar amount of industry payments were positively associated with ADA and RCI use (P < 0.001). From 2014 to 2018, there was a positive trend in the proportion of ADA (P = 0.007) and RCI (P = 0.007) used and negative trend in the proportion of MMF (P = 0.025) used. CONCLUSION From 2014 to 2018, the use of ADA and RCI increased while MMF decreased and MTX remained stable. There was a positive association between ADA and RCI use and physician-industry interactions. A causal relationship is not determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun Watane
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marissa Patel
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Nicolas A Yannuzzi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ninani Kombo
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jayanth Sridhar
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bernal-Morales C, Ramanan AV, Pavesio C. Use of immunomodulators in non-infectious uveitis: lights and shadows. Eye (Lond) 2024:10.1038/s41433-024-03294-9. [PMID: 39160332 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03294-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is one of the leading causes of sight impairment worldwide. Corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for acute NIU, although their known systemic and ocular side effects limit their long-term use. The most common types of immunosuppressants used as steroid-sparing treatment are non-biologic drugs, particularly antimetabolites (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine) and biologic drugs, mainly TNF-α inhibitors such as Adalimumab or Infliximab. Antimetabolites have shown their effectiveness in the treatment of NIU in individual and comparative studies, being methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil usually preferred over azathioprine. The choice of which antimetabolite to use at first is not well defined, and decisions usually depend on the patient's characteristics and the physician's preferences. Treatment of NIU with biologic drugs, and particularly TNF-α inhibitors, has significantly increased in the last years and is considered an important alternative in patients not responding to first-line immunomodulators such as antimetabolites. However, data regarding how different immunomodulators or biologic drugs perform in different NIU is still limited, and little is known about the optimization of both biologic and non-biologic drugs when used in NIU. Further randomized clinical trials and comparative studies are required to achieve more understanding and better results when addressing complicated NIU. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of non-biologic and biologic drugs in NIU, which may be useful for clinicians in their daily practice, and to address those aspects that are less known about these treatments as well as their weaknesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Bernal-Morales
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Athimalaipet V Ramanan
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children & Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Carlos Pavesio
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pillai MR, Balasubramaniam N, Wala N, Mathews AM, Tejeswi B, Krishna H, Ishrath D, Rathinam SR, Sithiq Uduman S M. Glaucoma in Uveitic Eyes: Long-Term Clinical Course and Management Measures. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2024; 32:1041-1047. [PMID: 37140329 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2023.2202740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of glaucoma in uveitis is challenging. A meticulous combination of anti-glaucoma and anti-inflammatory agents is often needed to control the intraocular pressure (IOP) and preserve the visual status in an otherwise blinding disease. AIM To study the clinical course and management of glaucoma in uveitic eyes. METHODS A retrospective study analyzing the case records of patients over 12 years, referred for the management of uveitic glaucoma in the last two decades. RESULTS The analysis of 582 uveitic glaucoma eyes of 389 patients was done, and the mean IOP at baseline was 25.89 (±13.1) mmHg. Non-granulomatous uveitis (102 eyes) was the most common diagnosis. Granulomatous uveitis was the most common diagnosis among the treatment failure eyes and in eyes requiring more than one surgical intervention for glaucoma. CONCLUSION An appropriate and adequate combination of anti-inflammatory and IOP-lowering therapy will lead to better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manju R Pillai
- Glaucoma Services, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India
| | | | - Narendra Wala
- Glaucoma Services, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India
| | | | - Beeram Tejeswi
- Glaucoma Services, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India
| | - Harini Krishna
- General Ophthalmology, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India
| | - Deeba Ishrath
- Glaucoma Services, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Acharya NR, Rathinam SR, Thundikandy R, Kanakath A, Murugan SB, Vedhanayaki R, Gonzales JA, Lim LL, Suhler EB, Al-Dhibi HA, Doan T, Arellanes-Garcia L, Coyne A, Porco TC, Shantha JG. Outcomes in Patients With Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease From the First-Line Antimetabolites for Steroid-Sparing Treatment Uveitis Trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2024; 267:100-111. [PMID: 38909740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the effectiveness of methotrexate (MTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of uveitis in patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease. METHODS A subanalysis of patients with VKH from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment Uveitis Trial, a randomized, observer-masked, comparative effectiveness trial, with comparisons by treatment (MTX vs MMF) and disease stage (acute vs chronic). Individuals with noninfectious uveitis were placed on a standardized corticosteroid taper and block randomized 1:1 to either 25 mg weekly oral MTX or 1.5 g twice daily oral MMF. The primary outcome was treatment success defined by corticosteroid-sparing control of uveitis at 6 months. Additional outcomes included change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), retinal central subfield thickness (CST), and resolution of serous retinal detachment (SRD). RESULTS Ninety-three out of 216 enrolled patients had VKH; 49 patients were randomized to MTX and 44 to MMF, of which 85 patients (46 on MTX, 39 on MMF) contributed to the primary outcome. There was no significant difference in treatment success by antimetabolite (80.4% for MTX compared to 64.1% for MMF; P = .12) or in BSCVA improvement (P = .78). MTX was superior to MMF in reducing CST (P = .003) and resolving SRD (P = .02). There was no significant difference in treatment success by disease stage (P = .25), but patients with acute VKH had greater improvement in BSCVA (P < .001) and reduction of CST (P = .02) than chronic VKH patients. CONCLUSIONS MTX and MMF have comparable outcomes as corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapies for VKH. Visual acuity improvement was greater in acute vs chronic VKH. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182929.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisha R Acharya
- From the F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., A.C., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California (N.R.A.), San Francisco, California, USA.
| | - Sivakumar R Rathinam
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology (S.R.R., R.T., R.V.), Madurai, India
| | - Radhika Thundikandy
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology (S.R.R., R.T., R.V.), Madurai, India
| | - Anuradha Kanakath
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology (A.K.), Coimbatore, India
| | - S Bala Murugan
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology (S.B.), Pondicherry, India
| | - R Vedhanayaki
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology (S.R.R., R.T., R.V.), Madurai, India
| | - John A Gonzales
- From the F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., A.C., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lyndell L Lim
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital (L.L.L.), East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eric B Suhler
- Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University (E.B.S.), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Hassan A Al-Dhibi
- Division of Vitreoretinal Surgery and Uveitis, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (H.A.A.D.), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Thuy Doan
- From the F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., A.C., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Alison Coyne
- From the F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., A.C., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Travis C Porco
- From the F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., A.C., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jessica G Shantha
- From the F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., A.C., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California (N.R.A., J.A.G., T.D., T.C.P., J.G.S.), San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al-Janabi A, Sharief L, Al Qassimi N, Chen YH, Ding T, Ambler G, Ladas D, Lightman S, Tomkins-Netzer O. Can Simvastatin Reduce the Need for Immunomodulatory Drugs to Treat Uveitis?: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE 2023; 3:100333. [PMID: 37449048 PMCID: PMC10336795 DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg/day versus placebo in patients with noninfectious nonanterior uveitis receiving prednisolone ≥ 10 mg/day. Design Randomized, double-masked, controlled trial. Subjects Adult patients with noninfectious nonanterior uveitis on oral prednisolone dose of ≥ 10 mg/day. Methods Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either simvastatin 80 mg/day or placebo. A total of 32 patients were enrolled (16 in each arm), all of whom completed the primary end point, and 21 reached the 2-year visit (secondary end points). Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was mean reduction in the daily prednisolone dose at 12 months follow-up. Secondary end points were mean reduction in prednisolone dose at 24 months, percent of patients with a reduction in second-line immunomodulatory agents, time to disease relapse, and adverse events. Results Our results show that simvastatin 80 mg/day did not have a significant corticosteroid-sparing effect at 12 months (estimate: 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.15 to 15.38; P = 0.54). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to prednisolone dose or change in dose at 12 and 24 months. There was no difference between the 2 groups in percent of patients with reduction in second-line agent by 24 months. Among patients who achieved disease quiescence, the median time to first relapse was longer for those receiving simvastatin (38 weeks, 95% CI: 14-54) than placebo (14 weeks, 95% CI: 12-52), although this was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in adverse events or serious adverse events between the 2 groups. Conclusions Simvastatin 80 mg/day did not have an effect on the dose reduction of corticosteroids or conventional immunomodulatory drugs at 1 and 2 years. The results suggest that it may extend the time to disease relapse among those who achieve disease quiescence. Financial Disclosures The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Al-Janabi
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, UCL/Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Lazha Sharief
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, UCL/Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Noura Al Qassimi
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, UCL/Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Yi-Hsing Chen
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, UCL/Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Tao Ding
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dimitris Ladas
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, UCL/Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Sue Lightman
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, UCL/Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Oren Tomkins-Netzer
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, UCL/Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
- Department of Ophthalmology, Carmel Medical Center, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tallouzi MO, Moore DJ, Bucknall N, Murray PI, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK, Mathers J. Healthcare professionals' views on the most important outcomes for non-infectious uveitis of the posterior segment: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294117. [PMID: 37976313 PMCID: PMC10655978 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveitis comprises a range of conditions that result in intraocular inflammation. Most sight-threatening uveitis falls into the broad category known as Non-infectious Posterior Segment-Involving Uveitis (PSIU). To evaluate treatments, trialists and clinicians must select outcome measures. The aim of this study was to understand healthcare professionals' perspectives on what outcomes are important to adult patients with PSIU and their carers. METHODS Twelve semi-structured telephone interviews were undertaken to understand the perspectives of healthcare professionals. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Findings were compared with the views of patients and carers and outcomes abstracted from a previously published systematic review. RESULTS Eleven core domains were identified as important to healthcare professionals: (1) visual function, (2) symptoms, (3) functional ability, (4) impact on relationships, (5) financial impact, (6) psychological morbidity and emotional well-being (7) psychosocial adjustment to uveitis, (8) doctor / patient / interprofessional relationships and access to health care, (9) treatment burden, (10) treatment side effects, (11) disease control. Healthcare professionals recognised a similar range of domains to patients and carers but placed more emphasis on certain outcomes, particularly in the disease control domain. In contrast the range of outcomes identified via the systematic review was limited. CONCLUSION Healthcare professionals recognise all of the published outcome domains as patients/carers in the previous publication but with subtly differing emphasis within some domains and with a priority for certain types of measures. Healthcare professionals discussed the disease control and side effects/complications to a greater degree than patients and carers in the focus groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad O. Tallouzi
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences. University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences. University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - David J. Moore
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences. University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Bucknall
- Patient Involvement Group in Uveitis (PInGU), Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Philip I. Murray
- Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie J. Calvert
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences. University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences. University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre and NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands at the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alastair K. Denniston
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences. University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Mathers
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences. University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences. University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beltrán Catalán E, Brito García N, Pato Cour E, Muñoz Fernández S, Gómez Gómez A, Díaz Valle D, Hernández Garfella M, Francisco Hernández FM, Trujillo Martín MDM, Silva Fernández L, Villanueva G, Suárez Cuba J, Blanco R. SER recommendations for the treatment of uveitis. REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA 2023; 19:465-477. [PMID: 37839964 DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop evidence-based expert-consensus recommendations for the management of non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-demyelinating disease associated uveitis. METHODS Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified, and reformulated into PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) by a panel of experts selected based on their experience in the field. A systematic review of the available evidence was conducted, and evidence was graded according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria. Subsequently, recommendations were developed. RESULTS Three PICO questions were constructed referring to uveitis anterior, non-anterior and complicated with macular edema. A total of 19 recommendations were formulated, based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS Here we present the first official recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology for the treatment of non-infectious and non-demyelinating disease associated uveitis. They can be directly applied to the Spanish healthcare system as a tool for assistance and therapeutic homogenisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Noé Brito García
- Unidad de Investigación, Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Santiago Muñoz Fernández
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía. Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - David Díaz Valle
- Unidad de Inflamación Ocular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Lucía Silva Fernández
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Julio Suárez Cuba
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Blanco
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Triggianese P, Fatica M, Caso F, Costa L, D'Antonio A, Tasso M, Greco E, Conigliaro P, Bergamini A, Fabiani C, Cantarini L, Chimenti MS. Rheumatologist's Perspective on Non-Infectious Uveitis: Patterns from Tertiary Referral Rheumatologic Clinics in Italy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24119690. [PMID: 37298638 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) can be an early or even the first extra-articular manifestation of systemic rheumatic diseases, or the first one; thus, rheumatologists are often involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic assessment of NIU. We evaluated 130 patients with a diagnosis of NIU who were admitted to two Italian rheumatologic clinics (Tor Vergata University Hospital in Rome, and Federico II University in Naples) from January 2018 to December 2021. Anterior uveitis (AU) occurred in 75.4% of patients, followed by posterior uveitis (PU, 21.5%); acute (54.6%) and recurrent (35.4%) NIU were more documented than chronic NIU (10%), and a bilateral involvement was observed in 38.7% of cases. Half of NIU cases were associated with spondyloarthritis (SpA); the remaining were affected by Behçet disease (BD)-related uveitis (13.9%) and idiopathic NIU (9.2%). HLA-B27+ patients (34.8%) had a higher prevalence of anterior and unilateral NIU (p = 0.005) with acute course (p = 0.04) than HLA-B27- patients. On the contrary, HLA-B51+ patients (19.6%) had mostly PU and bilateral NIU (p < 0.0001) and recurrent course (p = 0.04) than HLA-B51- patients. At the first rheumatologic referral, 117 patients (90%) received systemic treatments. Findings from this study demonstrate that rheumatologic referral has a pivotal role in the diagnostic work-up of NIU and may dramatically influence NIU-treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Triggianese
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of "Medicina dei Sistemi", PhD in Immunology, Molecular Medicine and Applied Biotechnology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Fatica
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of "Medicina dei Sistemi", PhD in Immunology, Molecular Medicine and Applied Biotechnology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Caso
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luisa Costa
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Arianna D'Antonio
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of "Medicina dei Sistemi", PhD in Immunology, Molecular Medicine and Applied Biotechnology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Tasso
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Greco
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of "Medicina dei Sistemi", PhD in Immunology, Molecular Medicine and Applied Biotechnology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Conigliaro
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of "Medicina dei Sistemi", PhD in Immunology, Molecular Medicine and Applied Biotechnology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Bergamini
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of "Medicina dei Sistemi", PhD in Immunology, Molecular Medicine and Applied Biotechnology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Fabiani
- Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Luca Cantarini
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Research Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behcet's Disease Clinic, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Maria Sole Chimenti
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of "Medicina dei Sistemi", PhD in Immunology, Molecular Medicine and Applied Biotechnology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wilson L, Lewis KE, Evans LS, Dillon SR, Pepple KL. Systemic Administration of Acazicolcept, a Dual CD28 and Inducible T cell Costimulator Inhibitor, Ameliorates Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2023; 12:27. [PMID: 36976157 PMCID: PMC10064916 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.3.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Combined inhibition of CD28 and inducible T cell costimulator (ICOS) pathways with acazicolcept (ALPN-101) represents a potential new treatment for uveitis. Here, we evaluate preclinical efficacy using experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) in Lewis rats. Methods Efficacy was tested in 57 Lewis rats treated with either systemic (subcutaneous) or local (intravitreal) administration of acazicolcept and compared to treatment with a matched Fc-only control or corticosteroid. Impact of treatment on uveitis was assessed using clinical scoring, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and histology. Ocular effector T cell populations were determined using flow cytometry, and multiplex ELISA used to measure aqueous cytokine concentrations. Results When compared to Fc control treatment, systemic acazicolcept led to statistically significant decreases in clinical score (P < 0.01), histologic score (P < 0.05), and number of ocular CD45+ cells (P < 0.01). Number of ocular CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing IL-17A+ and IFNγ+ were also decreased with statistical significance (P < 0.01). Similar results were achieved with corticosteroids. Intravitreal acazicolcept decreased inflammation scores when compared to untreated fellow eyes and to Fc control treated eyes, although not statistically significant. Systemic toxicity, measured by weight loss, occurred in the corticosteroid-treated, but not in the acazicolcept-treated animals. Conclusions Systemic treatment with acazicolcept statistically significantly suppressed EAU. Acazicolcept was well-tolerated without the weight loss associated with corticosteroids. Acazicolcept may be an effective alternative to corticosteroids for use in treating autoimmune uveitis. Additional studies are needed to clarify the optimal dose and route for use in humans. Translational Relevance We show that T cell costimulatory blockade could be an effective mechanism for treating uveitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Wilson
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Stacey R. Dillon
- Translational Medicine, Alpine Immune Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathryn L. Pepple
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Edwards Mayhew RG, Li T, McCann P, Leslie L, Strong Caldwell A, Palestine AG. Non-biologic, steroid-sparing therapies for non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 10:CD014831. [PMID: 36315029 PMCID: PMC9621106 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014831.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis (NIIPPU) represent a heterogenous collection of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders isolated to or concentrated in the posterior structures of the eye. Because NIIPPU is typically a chronic condition, people with NIIPPU frequently require treatment with steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy. Methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and tacrolimus are non-biologic, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) which have been used to treat people with NIIPPU. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness and safety of selected DMARDs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and azathioprine) in the treatment of NIIPPU in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, most recently on 16 April 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing selected DMARDs (methotrexate, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and azathioprine) with placebo, standard of care (topical steroids, with or without oral steroids), or with each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We included 11 RCTs with a total of 601 participants in this review. DMARDs versus control Two studies compared an experimental DMARD (cyclosporine A or enteric-coated mycophenolate [EC-MPS]) plus oral steroid with steroid monotherapy. We did not pool these results into a meta-analysis because the dose of cyclosporine used was much higher than that used in current clinical practice. The evidence is very uncertain about whether EC-MPS plus low-dose oral steroid results in a higher proportion of participants achieving control of inflammation over steroid monotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 7.17; 1 study, 41 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was reported separately for right and left eyes. The evidence for improvement (lower logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) indicates better vision) between the groups is very uncertain (mean difference [MD] -0.03 and -0.10, 95% CI -0.96 to 0.90 and -0.27 to 0.07 for right and left, respectively; 1 study, 82 eyes; very low-certainty evidence). No data were available for the following outcomes: proportion of participants achieving a 2-line improvement in visual acuity, with confirmed macular edema, or achieving steroid-sparing control. The evidence for the proportion of participants requiring cessation of medication in the DMARD versus control group is very uncertain (RR 2.61, 95% CI 0.11 to 60.51; 1 study, 41 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Methotrexate versus mycophenolate We were able to combine two studies into a meta-analysis comparing methotrexate versus mycophenolate mofetil. Methotrexate probably results in a slight increase in the proportion of participants achieving control of inflammation, including steroid-sparing control, compared to mycophenolate at six months (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.50; 2 studies, 261 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Change in BCVA was reported per eye and the treatments likely result in little to no difference in change in vision (MD 0.01 logMAR higher [worse] for methotrexate versus mycophenolate; 2 studies, 490 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). No data were available for the proportion of participants achieving a 2-line improvement in visual acuity. The evidence is very uncertain regarding the proportion of participants with confirmed macular edema between methotrexate versus mycophenolate (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.30; 2 studies, 35 eyes; very low-certainty). Methotrexate versus mycophenolate may result in little to no difference in the proportion of participants requiring cessation of medication (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.27; 2 studies, 296 participants; low-certainty evidence). Steroids with or without azathioprine versus cyclosporine A Four studies compared steroids with or without azathioprine (oral steroids, intravenous [IV] steroids, or azathioprine) to cyclosporine A. We excluded two studies from the meta-analysis because the participants were treated with 8 mg to 15 mg/kg/day of cyclosporine A, a significantly higher dose than is utilized today because of concerns for nephrotoxicity. The remaining two studies were conducted in all Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) populations and compared cyclosporine A to azathioprine or IV pulse-dose steroids. The evidence is very uncertain for whether the steroids with or without azathioprine or cyclosporine A influenced the proportion of participants achieving control of inflammation (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; 2 studies, 112 participants; very low-certainty evidence), achieving steroid-sparing control (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.25; 1 study, 21 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or requiring cessation of medication (RR 0.85, 95% 0.21 to 3.45; 2 studies, 91 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain for improvement in BCVA (MD 0.04 logMAR lower [better] with the steroids with or without azathioprine versus cyclosporine A; 2 studies, 91 eyes; very low-certainty evidence). There were no data available (with current cyclosporine A dosing) for the proportion of participants achieving a 2-line improvement in visual acuity or with confirmed macular edema. Studies not included in synthesis We were unable to include three studies in any of the comparisons (in addition to the aforementioned studies excluded based on historic doses of cyclosporine A). One was a dose-response study comparing cyclosporine A to cyclosporine G, a formulation which was never licensed and is not clinically available. We excluded another study from meta-analysis because it compared cyclosporine A and tacrolimus, considered to be of the same class (calcineurin inhibitors). We were unable to combine the third study, which examined tacrolimus monotherapy versus tacrolimus plus oral steroid, with any group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is a paucity of data regarding which DMARD is most effective or safe in NIIPPU. Studies in general were small, heterogenous in terms of their design and outcome measures, and often did not compare different classes of DMARD with each other. Methotrexate is probably slightly more efficacious than mycophenolate in achieving control of inflammation, including steroid-sparing control (moderate-certainty evidence), although there was insufficient evidence to prefer one medication over the other in the VKH subgroup (very low-certainty evidence). Methotrexate may result in little to no difference in safety outcomes compared to mycophenolate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tianjing Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Paul McCann
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Louis Leslie
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anne Strong Caldwell
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alan G Palestine
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kuiper JJ, Verhagen FH, Hiddingh S, Wennink RA, Hansen AM, Casey KA, Hoefer IE, Haitjema S, Drylewicz J, Yakin M, Sen HN, Radstake TRJ, de Boer JH. A Network of Serum Proteins Predict the Need for Systemic Immunomodulatory Therapy at Diagnosis in Noninfectious Uveitis. OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE 2022; 2:100175. [PMID: 36245752 PMCID: PMC9559086 DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Early identification of patients with noninfectious uveitis requiring steroid-sparing immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) is currently lacking in objective molecular biomarkers. We evaluated the proteomic signature of patients at the onset of disease and associated proteomic clusters with the need for IMT during the course of the disease. Design Multicenter cohort study. Participants Two hundred thirty treatment-free patients with active noninfectious uveitis. Methods We used aptamer-based proteomics (n = 1305 proteins) and a bioinformatic pipeline as a molecular stratification tool to define the serum protein network of a Dutch discovery cohort (n = 78) of patients and healthy control participants and independently validated our results in another Dutch cohort (n = 111) and a United States cohort (n = 67). Multivariate Cox analysis was used to assess the relationship between the protein network and IMT use. Main Outcome Measures Serum protein levels and use of IMT. Results Network-based analyses revealed a tightly coexpressed serum cluster (n = 85 proteins) whose concentration was consistently low in healthy control participants (n = 26), but varied among patients with noninfectious uveitis (n = 52). Patients with high levels of the serum cluster at disease onset showed a significantly increased need for IMT during follow-up, independent of anatomic location of uveitis (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–9.5; P = 0.019). The enrichment of neutrophil-associated proteins in the protein cluster led to our finding that the neutrophil count could serve as a clinical proxy for this proteomic signature (correlation: r = 0.57, P = 0.006). In an independent Dutch cohort (n = 111), we confirmed that patients with relatively high neutrophil count at diagnosis (> 5.2 × 109/L) had a significantly increased chance of requiring IMT during follow-up (hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–6.8; P = 0.002). We validated these findings in a third cohort of 67 United States patients. Conclusions A serum protein signature correlating with neutrophil levels was highly predictive for IMT use in noninfectious uveitis. We developed a routinely available tool that may serve as a novel objective biomarker to aid in clinical decision-making for noninfectious uveitis.
Collapse
|
12
|
Crowell EL, France R, Majmudar P, Jabs DA, Thorne JE. Treatment Outcomes in Birdshot Chorioretinitis: Corticosteroid Sparing, Corticosteroid Discontinuation, Remission, and Relapse. Ophthalmol Retina 2022; 6:620-627. [PMID: 35283323 DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe treatment-related outcomes among patients with birdshot chorioretinitis (BSCR). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS Patients diagnosed with BSCR at 2 tertiary care academic medical centers. METHODS Clinical and treatment-related data were collected for all patients with BSCR diagnosed between 2003 and 2017 at the 2 centers and for each eye at each clinical visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Four outcomes were considered: (1) corticosteroid-sparing success, defined as inactive disease and prednisone dose of ≤7.5 mg/day; (2) corticosteroid-discontinuation success, defined as inactive disease and discontinuation of prednisone; (3) sustained drug-free remission, defined as inactive disease off all medications for ≥3 months; and (4) relapse of BSCR after remission. RESULTS A total of 107 patients with BSCR were identified, of whom 94 had follow-up data. Corticosteroid-sparing success was achieved in 95.4% of the oral corticosteroid-treated patients at a rate of 0.60 successes per person-year (PY) (95% CI: 0.50/PY, 0.70/PY). The median time to corticosteroid-sparing success was 12 months. Corticosteroids were discontinued successfully in 76.5% of oral corticosteroid-treated patients (rate = 0.28/PY; 95% CI: 0.21/PY, 0.35/PY). The median time to successful corticosteroid discontinuation was 2.0 years. A sustained drug-free remission was achieved in 24 patients (rate = 0.06/PY; 95% CI: 0.04/PY, 0.09/PY), with approximately 25% of patients achieving remission by 4 years of follow-up. Relapse of inflammation in patients after achieving a sustained, drug-free remission occurred at a rate of 0.24/PY (95% CI: 0.14/PY, 0.37/PY). CONCLUSIONS Successful corticosteroid sparing and discontinuation was achieved in the majority of patients with BSCR. Remission occurred less often, but data were limited by the time needed to induce a remission (4 years) and the amount of follow-up (median, 4.6 years). The relapse rate after a remission was 0.24/PY.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L Crowell
- The Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Current affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, Mitchel and Shannon Wong Eye Institute, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Richard France
- Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Current affiliation: Eyecare Medical Group, Portland, Maine
| | - Palak Majmudar
- Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Current affiliation: Ridgewood Eye Associates, Paramus, New Jersey
| | - Douglas A Jabs
- The Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer E Thorne
- The Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kouwenberg CV, Wennink RA, Shahabi M, Bozkir I, Ayuso VKK, de Boer JH. Clinical course and outcome in pediatric idiopathic chronic anterior uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2022; 241:198-205. [PMID: 35513031 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the clinical course and outcome in children with idiopathic chronic anterior uveitis (iCAU) and compare the results with age-matched children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (JIA-U). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. METHODS Data regarding ocular complications, visual acuity, and systemic treatment were retrospectively collected for two patient groups that were matched regarding age and year of uveitis diagnosis. Outcome was evaluated using survival analysis. RESULTS The iCAU and JIA-U groups included 48 patients with 83 affected eyes and 48 patients with 73 affected eyes, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that iCAU was associated with a higher prevalence of posterior synechiae (adjusted hazard rate [aHR]: 3.63; P < 0.001) and cataract surgery (aHR: 2.90; P = 0.006). Baseline visual acuity was worse in the iCAU group compared to the JIA-U group (20/25 vs. 20/20, respectively; P < 0.001), but improved in the iCAU group after 5 years (20/20 vs. 20/20, respectively; P = 0.052). At the 5-year follow-up, the younger children with iCAU (≤8 years of age at diagnosis) had a higher prevalence of posterior synechiae (aHR: 2.56; P = 0.007), secondary glaucoma (aHR: 16.0; P = 0.020), and cataract surgery (aHR: 4.79; P = 0.004) compared to older children with iCAU (≥9 years at diagnosis). CONCLUSIONS Vision-threatening ocular complications are more common in children with iCAU compared to children with JIA-U, particularly in cases in which the onset of uveitis occurred at ≤8 years of age. However, the long-term vision of these children can be improved with adequate treatment.
Collapse
|
14
|
Rivas AB, Lopez-Picado A, Calamia V, Carreño E, Cocho L, Cordero-Coma M, Fonollosa A, Francisco Hernandez FM, Garcia-Aparicio A, Garcia-Gonzalez J, Mondejar JJ, Lojo-Oliveira L, Martínez-Costa L, Munoz S, Peiteado D, Pinto JA, Rodriguez-Lozano B, Pato E, Diaz-Valle D, Molina E, Tebar LA, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L. Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of methotrexate, adalimumab or their combination in non-infectious non-anterior uveitis: a protocol for a multicentre, randomised, parallel three arms, active-controlled, phase III open label with blinded outcome assessment study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051378. [PMID: 35318229 PMCID: PMC8943738 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-infectious uveitis include a heterogeneous group of sight-threatening and incapacitating conditions. Their correct management sometimes requires the use of immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs), prescribed in monotherapy or in combination. Several observational studies showed that the use of ISDs in combination could be more effective than and as safe as their use in monotherapy. However, a direct comparison between these two treatment strategies has not been carried out yet. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Combination THerapy with mEthotrexate and adalImumAb for uveitis (CoTHEIA) study is a phase III, multicentre, prospective, randomised, single-blinded with masked outcome assessment, parallel three arms with 1:1:1 allocation, active-controlled, superiority study design, comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of methotrexate, adalimumab or their combination in non-infectious non-anterior uveitis. We aim to recruit 192 subjects. The duration of the treatment and follow-up will last up to 52 weeks, plus 70 days follow-up with no treatment. The complete and maintained resolution of the ocular inflammation will be assessed by masked evaluators (primary outcome). In addition to other secondary measurements of efficacy (quality of life, visual acuity and costs) and safety, we will identify subjects' subgroups with different treatment responses by developing prediction models based on machine learning techniques using genetic and proteomic biomarkers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol, annexes and informed consent forms were approved by the Reference Clinical Research Ethic Committee at the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain) and the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products. We will elaborate a dissemination plan including production of materials adapted to several formats to communicate the clinical trial progress and findings to a broad group of stakeholders. The promoter will be the only access to the participant-level data, although it can be shared within the legal situation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER 2020-000130-18; NCT04798755.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Belen Rivas
- Unidad de Investigación Clinica y Ensayos Clínicos, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
- Departamento de Enfermería. Facultad Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amanda Lopez-Picado
- Unidad de Investigación Clinica y Ensayos Clínicos, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Valentina Calamia
- Unidad de Proteómica. Grupo de Investigación de Reumatología (GIR), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, and Universidade da Coruña, A Coruna, Galicia, Spain
| | - Ester Carreño
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, and University Hospital Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lidia Cocho
- Department of Ophthalmology, IOBA (Institute of Applied OphthalmoBiology), University of Valladolid, and Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain
| | - Miguel Cordero-Coma
- Uveitis Unit, University Hospital of León, IBIOMED, and University of León, Leon, Spain
| | - Alex Fonollosa
- Department of Ophthalmology, BioCruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo, País Vasco, Spain
| | - Felix M Francisco Hernandez
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | - Javier Garcia-Gonzalez
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Juan Mondejar
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain
| | | | - Llucí Martínez-Costa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Santiago Munoz
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, San Sebastian de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Peiteado
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Antonio Pinto
- Department of Rheumatology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruna, Galicia, Spain
| | - Beatriz Rodriguez-Lozano
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canarias, Spain
| | - Esperanza Pato
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Diaz-Valle
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Molina
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Alberto Tebar
- Unidad de Investigación Clinica y Ensayos Clínicos, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez
- Musculoskeletal Pathology Group, Fundacion para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Karam M, Alsaif A, Al-Naseem A, Hayre A, Al Jabbouri A, Aldubaikhi A, Kahlar N, Al-Mutairi S. Mycophenolate versus Methotrexate in Non-infectious Ocular Inflammatory Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2022; 31:613-620. [PMID: 35201968 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2034166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus methotrexate (MTX) in non-infectious ocular inflammatory disease (NIOID). METHODS The study was performed as per the PRISMA Guidelines. A search identified all studies comparing MMF versus MTX in NIOID. Treatment result and side effects were primary outcomes. RESULTS Four studies enrolling 905 patients were identified. There was no significant difference between MMF and MTX groups in overall treatment success (OR = 0.97, P = .96), treatment failure (OR = 0.86, P = .85). MTX showed a significantly improved effect in cases involving posterior uveitis and panuveitis (OR = 0.41, P = .003). In addition, MTX was associated with a faster median time to treatment success and had less side effects when compared to MTX, however this was not significant. For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was found in visual acuity and resolution of macular oedema. CONCLUSION MMF is comparable to MTX in the treatment of NIOID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Karam
- Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBChB), School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Farwaniya Hospital, Ministry of Health, State of Kuwait
| | - Abdulmalik Alsaif
- Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBChB), School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,West Midlands, West Midlands, UK
| | | | - Amrit Hayre
- Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBChB), School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ahmed Aldubaikhi
- Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery (MBBS), College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Narvair Kahlar
- Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBChB), School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, West Midlands, UK
| | - Salem Al-Mutairi
- Senior Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon (M.D, FRCSC, External Eye Diseases, Cornea, Refractive Surgery and Uveitis), Head of Uveitis Unit, Al-Bahar Eye Center, Ministry of Health of Kuwait, State of Kuwait.,Program Director of Kuwait Board of Ophthalmology, Kuwait Institute of Medical Specialities (KIMS), State of Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tsui E, Rathinam SR, Gonzales JA, Thundikandy R, Kanakath A, Balamurugan S, Vedhanayaki R, Lim LL, Suhler EB, Al-Dhibi HA, Doan T, Keenan J, Ebert CD, Kim E, Madow B, Porco TC, Acharya NR. Outcomes of uveitic macular edema in the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial. Ophthalmology 2022; 129:661-667. [PMID: 35143800 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the outcomes of uveitic macular edema at 6 months and 12 months in patients treated with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. DESIGN Subanalysis of a block-randomized, observer-masked, multi-center clinical trial. SUBJECTS/PARTICIPANTS Patients were enrolled into the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial between August 2013 and August 2017. METHODS/INTERVENTION/TESTING Patients were randomized to oral methotrexate 25mg weekly or mycophenolate mofetil 1.5g twice daily for 12 months, along with a corticosteroid taper. In addition to standardized clinical examination, all patients underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging at each visit. At the 6-month primary endpoint, patients who achieved treatment success continued the same treatment for a subsequent 6 months and treatment failures switched to the other treatment group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Pre-specified primary outcome at 6 months and 12 months outcomes of central subfield thickness and visual acuity. RESULTS Of 216 patients in the FAST Trial, 42 eyes of 30 patients in the methotrexate group and 55 eyes of 41 patients in the mycophenolate group had uveitic macular edema. Baseline median central subfield thickness was 359μm and 342μm in the methotrexate and mycophenolate groups, respectively. At 12 months, for those who stayed on the same treatment, macular thickness decreased from baseline by 23 μm (IQR, -39.0 to 13) and 18 μm (IQR, -68.5 to 9), in the methotrexate and mycophenolate groups, respectively, (P=0.76). In patients who switched treatment at 6 months, macular thickness decreased from baseline by 12.5 μm (IQR, -29.8 to -2.3) and 92 μm (IQR, -240 to -18) in the methotrexate and mycophenolate groups, respectively, (P=0.23). At 12 months, 7/19 (37%) eyes on methotrexate had resolution of macular edema compared to 15/25 (60%) eyes on mycophenolate (P=0.10). For those that switched treatments, 8/17 (47%) eyes on methotrexate and 6/11 (55%) eyes on mycophenolate had improvement of macular edema, (P=0.92) CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil for uveitic macular edema results in similar improvements in macular thickness at 6 and 12 months. At 12 months, approximately half of eyes in each antimetabolite group still had persistent macular edema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund Tsui
- F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Stein Eye Institute at University of California, Los Angeles, California and David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sivakumar R Rathinam
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India
| | - John A Gonzales
- F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Radhika Thundikandy
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India
| | - Anuradha Kanakath
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Coimbatore, India
| | - S Balamurugan
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, India
| | - R Vedhanayaki
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India
| | - Lyndell L Lim
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eric B Suhler
- Division of Vitreoretinal Surgery and Uveitis, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan A Al-Dhibi
- Division of Vitreoretinal Surgery and Uveitis, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Thuy Doan
- F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jeremy Keenan
- F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Caleb D Ebert
- F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Eric Kim
- F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Brian Madow
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Travis C Porco
- F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Nisha R Acharya
- F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Systemic Immunosuppression for the Treatment of Pediatric Uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2022; 62:155-175. [PMID: 34965233 DOI: 10.1097/iio.0000000000000402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
18
|
Harada Y, Hiyama T, Kiuchi Y. Methotrexate Effectively Controls Ocular Inflammation in Japanese Patients With Non-infectious Uveitis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:732427. [PMID: 34869426 PMCID: PMC8636923 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.732427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This single-center retrospective study investigated the clinical characteristics and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis for more than 6 months at Hiroshima University, from February 2016 to May 2021. Outcome variables included changes in systemic immunosuppressive treatment and intraocular inflammation. Out of 448 patients with non-infectious uveitis, 35 patients (14 male patients and 21 female patients; 65 eyes) treated with MTX for more than 6 months were analyzed. There were 15 patients with anterior uveitis and 20 with posterior and panuveitis. The mean dose of systemic corticosteroids decreased from 12.1 mg/day at baseline to 1.3 mg/day at 6 months and 0.6 mg at 12 months after starting MTX, and approximately 90% of patients were corticosteroid-free at 12 months. The percentage of eyes with inactive uveitis at 6, 12, and 24 months was 49.2%, 59.6%, and 90.0%, respectively. Mean relapse rate score also significantly decreased from 2.88 at baseline to 0.85 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Inflammatory control was achieved with MTX doses of 8-16 mg/week, with a median dose of 12 mg/week. Adverse effects of MTX were observed in 34.3% of patients, and 11.4% required discontinuation; most commonly hepatotoxicity (58.3%), followed by fatigue (25.0%), and hair loss (16.7%). No significant differences were found between the survival curves of patients with anterior uveitis and posterior/panuveitis (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The percentage of eyes without IOP-lowering eye drops was significantly higher in patients with posterior/panuveitis at 24 months (p = 0.001). Our study suggests that MTX is effective in controlling ocular inflammation for Japanese patients with non-infectious uveitis. Relatively high incidence of MTX-related adverse effects in the Japanese population indicates that careful monitoring and dose adjustments are crucial for the long-term use of this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Harada
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomona Hiyama
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Kiuchi
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Leclercq M, Andrillon A, Maalouf G, Sève P, Bielefeld P, Gueudry J, Sené T, Moulinet T, Rouvière B, Sène D, Desbois AC, Domont F, Touhami S, El Chamieh C, Cacoub P, Bodaghi B, Biard L, Saadoun D. Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor α versus Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Refractory Uveitic Macular Edema: A Multicenter Study from the French Uveitis Network. Ophthalmology 2021; 129:520-529. [PMID: 34793830 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the factors associated with response (control of ocular inflammation and corticosteroid-sparing effect) to biologics (anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α agents and tocilizumab) in patients with refractory uveitic macular edema (ME). DESIGN Multicenter, retrospective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients with uveitic ME refractory to systemic corticosteroids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, or both. METHODS Patients received anti-TNF-α agents (infliximab 5 mg/kg at week 0, 2, 6, and every 4-6 weeks [n = 69] and adalimumab 40 mg/2 weeks [n = 80]) and tocilizumab (8 mg/kg every 4 weeks intravenously [n = 39] and 162 mg/week subcutaneously [n = 16]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Analysis of complete and partial response rates, relapse rate, low vision (visual acuity in at least 1 eye of ≥ 1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), corticosteroid-sparing effect, and adverse events at 6 months. RESULTS Two hundred four patients (median age, 40 years [interquartile range, 28-58 years]; 42.2% men) were included. Main causes of uveitis included Behçet's disease (17.2%), birdshot chorioretinopathy (11.3%), and sarcoidosis (7.4%). The overall response rate at 6 months was 46.2% (21.8% of complete response) with anti-TNF-α agents and 58.5% (35.8% of complete response) with tocilizumab. In multivariate analysis, treatment with tocilizumab (odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-4.06; P = 0.03) was associated independently with complete response of uveitic ME compared with anti-TNF-α agents. Anti-TNF-α agents and tocilizumab did not differ significantly in terms of relapse rate (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.31-3.18; P = 0.99) or occurrence of low vision (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.51-2.07; P = 0.95) or corticosteroid-sparing effect (P = 0.29). Adverse events were reported in 20.6% of patients, including serious adverse events reported in 10.8% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Tocilizumab seems to improve complete response of uveitic ME compared with anti-TNF-α agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Leclercq
- Internal Medicine Department, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France; Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Sorbonne Universités, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoimmunes et Systémiques Rares, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoinflammatoires Rares et Amylose Inflammatoire, and INSERM, UMR S 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Paris, France
| | - Anaïs Andrillon
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Information, CRESS UMR 1153, INSERM, ECSTRRA Team, Saint-Louis University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Georgina Maalouf
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Sorbonne Universités, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoimmunes et Systémiques Rares, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoinflammatoires Rares et Amylose Inflammatoire, and INSERM, UMR S 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Paris, France
| | - Pascal Sève
- Internal Medicine Department, Hôpital de la Croix- Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, and Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Claude Bernard-Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Philip Bielefeld
- Internal Medicine and Systemic Diseases Department (Médecine Interne 2), Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Julie Gueudry
- Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Charles Nicolle, CHU Rouen, and EA7510, UFR Santé, Rouen University, Rouen, France
| | - Thomas Sené
- Internal Medicine Department, Fondation Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Moulinet
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHRU de Nancy, and Université de Lorraine, Inserm UMR_S 1116, Nancy, France
| | - Bénédicte Rouvière
- Internal Medicine and Pneumology Department, CHU de Brest, Hôpital La Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
| | - Damien Sène
- Internal Medicine Department, Lariboisière Hospital, and INSERM UMR 969, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Claire Desbois
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Sorbonne Universités, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoimmunes et Systémiques Rares, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoinflammatoires Rares et Amylose Inflammatoire, and INSERM, UMR S 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Paris, France
| | - Fanny Domont
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Sorbonne Universités, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoimmunes et Systémiques Rares, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoinflammatoires Rares et Amylose Inflammatoire, and INSERM, UMR S 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Paris, France
| | - Sara Touhami
- Ophthalmology Department, DHU ViewRestore, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Carolla El Chamieh
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Information, CRESS UMR 1153, INSERM, ECSTRRA Team, Saint-Louis University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Patrice Cacoub
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Sorbonne Universités, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoimmunes et Systémiques Rares, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoinflammatoires Rares et Amylose Inflammatoire, and INSERM, UMR S 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Paris, France
| | - Bahram Bodaghi
- Ophthalmology Department, DHU ViewRestore, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Lucie Biard
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Information, CRESS UMR 1153, INSERM, ECSTRRA Team, Saint-Louis University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - David Saadoun
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Sorbonne Universités, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoimmunes et Systémiques Rares, Centre National de Références Maladies Autoinflammatoires Rares et Amylose Inflammatoire, and INSERM, UMR S 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shah J, Shah A, Hassman L, Gutierrez A. Ocular Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27:1832-1838. [PMID: 33501989 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izaa359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by intestinal inflammation; however, it is also known to have extraintestinal manifestations. Ocular manifestations of IBD include keratopathy, episcleritis, scleritis, and uveitis and are among the most common extraintestinal manifestations. These diseases can lead to significant ocular morbidity if unrecognized and left untreated. A review of the literature was performed on PubMed and is summarized and critically appraised in this article with the aim being to describe the varying ocular manifestations of IBD and outlining their treatments. Ultimately, a framework is provided to investigate ocular symptoms in patients with IBD. An ocular review of systems is also provided as a tool to equip gastroenterologists and internal medicine physicians to be able to recognize and triage ocular complaints appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janaki Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Aaditya Shah
- Department of Ophthalmology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lynn Hassman
- Department of Ophthalmology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alexandra Gutierrez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tang Lee Say TL, Yang V, Fingret JM, Zagora S, Symes R, Younan C, Cornish EE, Verma N, Sammel A, Wakefield D, Speden D, McCluskey PJ. Adalimumab in patients with vision-threatening uveitis: real-world clinical experience. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2021; 6:e000819. [PMID: 34632076 PMCID: PMC8477319 DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Biologics are rapidly emerging as an effective vision saving addition to systemic uveitis therapy. The aim of this multicentre retrospective study is to review the outcomes of a large group of patients treated with adalimumab. Methods A retrospective chart review of patients with refractory non-infectious, active uveitis treated with adalimumab was conducted. The main outcome measures were ability to reduce prednisolone dose, ability to control uveitis, final visual acuity and time to treatment failure. Results Forty-six patients with uveitis, treated with adalimumab were included in the study. The most common anatomical uveitis phenotype was panuveitis (n=17, 37.0%). The most common diagnosis was idiopathic uveitis (n=19, 41.3%). At their latest review (mean: 4.46 years; median 4.40 years), 35 (76.1%) patients were able to discontinue corticosteroids, 11 (23.9%) patients were able to taper to <7.5 mg/day and only 1 (2.2%) patient required 10 mg of prednisone. The mean visual acuity at the latest follow-up of the worse eye was logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.42 (SD 0.72), while the mean visual acuity of the better eye was logMAR 0.19 (SD 0.34). Of the 89 eyes, 21 (23.6%) eyes improved by at least 2 lines, 5 eyes (5.6%) deteriorated by ≥2 lines while vision was unchanged in the remaining 63 (70.8%) eyes. The time to recurrence was 1 in 12.47 person-years for adalimumab, with a 17.4% (8 patient) relapse rate. There were no serious adverse events. Conclusions This study highlights the efficacy of adalimumab in patients with vision-threatening non-infectious uveitis, preserving vision and allowing reduction of corticosteroid dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Lee Tang Lee Say
- Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Cardinal Santos Medical Center, San Juan, Manila, Philippines
| | - Verlyn Yang
- Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.,University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Jacob M Fingret
- Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sophia Zagora
- Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Saint Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Symes
- Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine Younan
- Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elisa Eleanor Cornish
- Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nitin Verma
- Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,East Timor Eye Program, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Anthony Sammel
- Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Denis Wakefield
- Saint Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Peter J McCluskey
- Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Saint Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kate A, Basu S. Systemic Immunosuppression in Cornea and Ocular Surface Disorders: A Ready Reckoner for Ophthalmologists. Semin Ophthalmol 2021; 37:330-344. [PMID: 34423717 DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1966059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Many diseases of the cornea and ocular surface are manifestations of an underlying autoimmune process and require systemic immunosuppression for their management. These cases often present to a general ophthalmologist before being referred to an ocular immunologist or rheumatologist. However, the patients do need to be followed by the ophthalmologist to assess disease progression or for management of ocular co-morbidities and for taking care of ocular complications of the disease. Undeniably, there is a certain hesitance to promptly initiate them on systemic therapy because the literature regarding the indications, dosages, and side effects of this group of drugs is vast and dispersed.The aim of this review is to provide a source of ready reference for the general ophthalmologist as well as trainees and residents, on systemic immunosuppression for corneal and ocular surface disease. Methods: This review included 153 studies which were published as randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or as nonrandomized comparative studies (cohort or case-control series) on the topic of systemic immunosuppression in cornea and ocular surface disorders.Results: This review provides a concise summary of both the types of drugs and the common indications where they would be indicated, along with treatment and monitoring algorithms for each specific disease condition. The most used group of drugs are corticosteroids, which have significant side effects, particularly when administered systemically or for longer periods of time. To overcome this, steroid-sparing immunosuppressants are recommended. The four main classes of immunosuppressants used today are antimetabolites, T-cell inhibitors, alkylating agents and biologic agents. This review details the use of these drugs in ocular surface inflammation, including the dosing schedule, side effects and monitoring in allergic conjunctivitis, mucous membrane pemphigoid, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, immunological rejection against corneal allografts, anterior scleritis and aqueous deficiency dry eyes. Conclusions: This review provides an uncluttered and wholesome understanding of systemic immunosuppression in cornea and ocular surface diseases, with the hope that this will serve as a ready reckoner and help bridge the gap between ophthalmology and rheumatology for the betterment of our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Kate
- The Cornea Institute, KVC Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Vijayawada, India
| | - Sayan Basu
- The Cornea Institute, KAR Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.,Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre (BHERC), LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Touhami S, Gueudry J, Leclercq M, Touitou V, Ghembaza A, Errera MH, Saadoun D, Bodaghi B. Perspectives for immunotherapy in noninfectious immune mediated uveitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2021; 17:977-989. [PMID: 34264142 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2021.1956313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. In adult patients, anterior NIU is usually managed with topical corticosteroids. In intermediate, posterior uveitis. and panuveitis, systemic corticosteroids are used especially in case of bilaterality or association with systemic disease. Biotherapies are recommended in case of inefficacy or intolerance to corticosteroids or conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Anti-TNF-α agents are by far the most widely used biotherapies. In case of failure or poor tolerance to anti-TNF-α, new targeted therapies can be proposed.Areas covered: We present and discuss an updated overview on biologics and biotherapies in NIU.Expert opinion: In case of dependency to systemic or intravitreal steroids, sight-threatening disease, and/or failure of conventional immunosuppressive drugs, anti-TNF-α are used as first-line biologics to achieve quiescence of inflammation. Anti-interleukin-6 is another option that may be proposed as first-line biologic or in case of poor efficacy of anti-TNF-α. Interferon can be directly proposed in specific indications (e.g. refractory macular edema, sight-threatening Behçet's uveitis). In the rare cases that remain unresponsive to traditional biotherapies, novel molecules, such as Janus-associated-kinase and anti-phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitors can be used. Therapeutic response must always be evaluated by clinical and appropriate ancillary investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Touhami
- Department of Ophthalmology, DHU ViewRestore, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Julie Gueudry
- Department of Ophthalmology Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Mathilde Leclercq
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département De Médecine Interne Et Immunologie Clinique, Paris, France, Centre National De Références Maladies Autoimmunes Systémiques Rares, Centre National De Références Maladies Autoinflammatoires Et Amylose Inflammatoire; Inflammation-Immunopathology-Biotherapy Department (DMU 3iD); INSERM 959, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.,CHU Rouen, Department of Internal Medicine, Rouen, France
| | - Valérie Touitou
- Department of Ophthalmology, DHU ViewRestore, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Amine Ghembaza
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département De Médecine Interne Et Immunologie Clinique, Paris, France, Centre National De Références Maladies Autoimmunes Systémiques Rares, Centre National De Références Maladies Autoinflammatoires Et Amylose Inflammatoire; Inflammation-Immunopathology-Biotherapy Department (DMU 3iD); INSERM 959, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Marie Hélène Errera
- Ophthalmology Department and Laboratory and DHU Sight Restore, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie Des Quinze-Vingts, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Department of Ophthalmology, Pittsburgh University Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Saadoun
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département De Médecine Interne Et Immunologie Clinique, Paris, France, Centre National De Références Maladies Autoimmunes Systémiques Rares, Centre National De Références Maladies Autoinflammatoires Et Amylose Inflammatoire; Inflammation-Immunopathology-Biotherapy Department (DMU 3iD); INSERM 959, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Bahram Bodaghi
- Department of Ophthalmology, DHU ViewRestore, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The uveitides are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by inflammation inside the eye. The uveitides are classified as infectious or non-infectious. The non-infectious uveitides, which are presumed to be immune mediated, can be further divided into those that are associated with a known systemic disease and those that are eye limited,-ie, not associated with a systemic disease. The ophthalmologist identifies the specific uveitic entity by medical history, clinical examination, and ocular imaging, as well as supplemental laboratory testing, if indicated. Treatment of the infectious uveitides is tailored to the particular infectious organism and may include regional and/or systemic medication. First line treatment for non-infectious uveitides is corticosteroids that can be administered topically, as regional injections or surgical implants, or systemically. Systemic immunosuppressive therapy is used in patients with severe disease who cannot tolerate corticosteroids, require chronic corticosteroids at >7.5 mg/day prednisone, or in whom the disease is known to respond better to immunosuppression. Management of many of these diseases is optimized by coordination between the ophthalmologist and rheumatologist or internist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryn M Burkholder
- Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Douglas A Jabs
- Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Espinosa G, Herreras JM, Muñoz-Fernández S, García Ruiz de Morales JM, Cordero-Coma M. Recommendations statement on the immunosuppressive treatment of non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-anterior uveitis. Med Clin (Barc) 2020; 155:220.e1-220.e12. [PMID: 32199631 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2019.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To generate recommendations on the use of immunomodulators in patients with non-infectious, non-neoplastic intermediate uveitis (IU), posterior uveitis (PU) and panuveitis (PanU) based on best evidence and experience. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of 5 experts was established, who defined the scope, users, and sections of the document. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs in patients with non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-anterior uveitis. The results of the SLR were presented and discussed during an expert meeting in which 34 recommendations were generated. The level of agreement with the recommendations was also tested in 25 additional experts following a Delphi process. Recommendations were voted from 1 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). We defined agreement if at least 70% of the experts voted ≥7. The level of evidence and grade or recommendation were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. RESULTS The SLR included 33 articles. The 34 recommendations were accepted after 2 Delphi rounds (3 of them were modified after the first round). They include specific recommendations on patients with non-infectious, non-neoplastic, PU and PanU, as well as different treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS In patients with non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-anterior uveitis these recommendations might help treatment decision making, due to the lack of robust evidence or other globally accepted algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard Espinosa
- Servicio de Enfermedades Autoinmunes, Institut Clínic de Medicina i Dermatologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, España
| | - José M Herreras
- IOBA (Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología), Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, España; Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España
| | - Santiago Muñoz-Fernández
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, España; Universidad Europea, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, España
| | - José M García Ruiz de Morales
- Unidad de Uveítis, Servicio de Inmunología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, España; Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de León (IBIOMED), León, España
| | - Miguel Cordero-Coma
- Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de León (IBIOMED), León, España; Unidad de uveítis, Servicio de Oftalmología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, España.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gómez-Gómez A, Loza E, Rosario MP, Espinosa G, de Morales JMGR, Herrera JM, Muñoz-Fernández S, Rodríguez-Rodríguez L, Cordero-Coma M. Efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs in patients with non-infectious intermediate and posterior uveitis, panuveitis and macular edema: A systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50:1299-1306. [PMID: 33065425 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-infectious non-anterior uveitis (NINA) is a sight-threatening condition that often requires immunomodulatory drugs (IMDs) for its management. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the published evidence regarding the use of IMDs in adult patients with NINA uveitis including intermediate (IU) and posterior uveitis (PU), panuveitis (PanU) and macular edema (ME). METHODS We performed a systematic literature review. Search strategies were designed for Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Libraries for articles up to 2019 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the IMDs. A quality assessment was performed using the Jadad Scale. RESULTS Nineteen randomized clinical trials were selected from the 1,103 articles retrieved. Characteristics of patients, treatment dosages and outcome measures were heterogeneous. The outcomes most frequently analyzed were visual acuity (VA), macular thickness and vitreous haze (VH). Different IMDs were used at their usual dosages. Methotrexate (MTX), micophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine A (CsA), tacrolimus, adalimumab and sarilumab were effective in NINA uveitis. Rituximab combined with MTX was effective in PU. Interferon-β was superior to MTX, albeit with more adverse events in IU with ME. CsA was similar to cyclophosphamide (Cyc) in Behçet uveitis. Tacrolimus was safer and similar to CsA. Cyc was effective in serpiginoid choroiditis, but when combined with azathioprine in PU, but did not improve VA. Secukinumab did not prevent NINA uveitis recurrences, although intravenously it showed a higher response rate than when used subcutaneously. Daclizumab did not show any benefits in Behçet NINA uveitis. CONCLUSION Several IMDs and their combinations can be useful in treating NINA uveitis. The available studies were heterogeneous regarding patient characteristics and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Gómez-Gómez
- Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain; Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain
| | - Estíbaliz Loza
- Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética (INMUSC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Gerard Espinosa
- Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Institut Clinic de Medicina i Dermatologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José M García Ruiz de Morales
- Immunology unit, Complejo Asistencial Universitario e Instituto de Biomedicina Universidad de León (IBIOMED), León, Spain
| | - José M Herrera
- Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología (IOBA), University of Valladolid, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain
| | - Santiago Muñoz-Fernández
- Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Rodríguez-Rodríguez
- Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain; Rheumatology department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Cordero-Coma
- Uveitis unit, Complejo Asistencial Universitario e Instituto de Biomedicina University of León (IBIOMED), León, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang G, Peng X. A Review of Clinical Applications and Side Effects of Methotrexate in Ophthalmology. J Ophthalmol 2020; 2020:1537689. [PMID: 32850138 PMCID: PMC7439192 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1537689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate analog widely used against a range of diseases including malignancies and autoimmune disorders. Its high effectiveness-price ratio also won extensive application in ophthalmology. On the other hand, although MTX has an excellent pharmacological efficacy, MTX associated side effects in clinical use, which vary from patient to patient, are nonnegligible. There is no comparatively systematic review on MTX associated side effects and its risk factors. This review aimed to reveal novel clinical approaches of MTX and its adverse effects in order to provide a reference for ophthalmic scholars in clinical application of MTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Wang
- Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyan Peng
- Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dammacco R, Biswas J, Kivelä TT, Zito FA, Leone P, Mavilio A, Sisto D, Alessio G, Dammacco F. Ocular sarcoidosis: clinical experience and recent pathogenetic and therapeutic advancements. Int Ophthalmol 2020; 40:3453-3467. [PMID: 32740881 PMCID: PMC7669777 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01531-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To describe the ocular manifestations in a cohort of patients with systemic sarcoidosis (SS). Recent advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapy of SS are also discussed. Methods Data from 115 Italian patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All but the first 17 patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination. The diagnosis was based on clinical features, the demonstration of non-caseating granulomas in biopsies from involved organs, and multiple imaging techniques. Data on broncho-alveolar lavage fluid analysis, calcemia, calciuria, serum angiotensin-converting enzyme levels and soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels were retrieved when available. Results Ocular involvement, detected in 33 patients (28.7%), was bilateral in 29 (87.9%) and the presenting feature in 13 (39.4%). Anterior uveitis was diagnosed in 12 patients (36.4%), Löfgren syndrome and uveoparotid fever in one patient each (3%), intermediate uveitis in 3 patients (9.1%), posterior uveitis in 7 (21.2%), and panuveitis in 9 (27.3%). First-line therapy consisted of corticosteroids, administered as eyedrops (10 patients), sub-Tenon’s injections (1 patient), intravitreal implants (9 patients), or systemically (23 patients). Second-line therapy consisted of steroid-sparing immunosuppressants, including methotrexate (10 patients) and azathioprine (10 patients). Based on pathogenetic indications that tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α is a central mediator of granuloma formation, adalimumab, targeting TNF-α, was employed in 6 patients as a third-line agent for severe/refractory chronic sarcoidosis. Conclusion Uveitis of protean type, onset, duration, and course remains the most frequent ocular manifestation of SS. Diagnostic and therapeutic advancements have remarkably improved the overall visual prognosis. An ophthalmologist should be a constant component in the multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of this often challenging but intriguing disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna Dammacco
- Department of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Jyotirmay Biswas
- Department of Uveitis and Ocular Pathology, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India
| | - Tero T Kivelä
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Patrizia Leone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Medical School Polyclinic, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Alberto Mavilio
- Social Health District, Glaucoma Center, Azienda Sanitaria Locale, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Dario Sisto
- Department of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Giovanni Alessio
- Department of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Franco Dammacco
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Medical School Polyclinic, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Leclercq M, Langlois V, Girszyn N, Le Besnerais M, Benhamou Y, Levesque H, Muraine M, Gueudry J. Comparison of conventional immunosuppressive drugs versus anti-TNF-α agents in non-infectious non-anterior uveitis. J Autoimmun 2020; 113:102481. [PMID: 32586650 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and anti-TNF-α agents in patients with non-infectious non-anterior uveitis. METHODS Single center retrospective study including adult patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior or pan-uveitis. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with DMARDs or anti-TNF-α agents. The primary outcome was treatment failure or occurrence of serious adverse events. Treatment failure was determined by ophthalmologic criteria. RESULTS Seventy-three patients were included, mostly female (52%). Among them, 39 were treated with DMARDs and 34 with anti-TNF-α agents. The main uveitis causes were idiopathic (30%), birdshot chorio-retinopathy (25%), sarcoidosis (16%) and Behçet's disease (14%). The primary outcome was observed in 56% of patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents versus 59% of patients treated with DMARDs (p = 0.82). Median time to observe the primary outcome was 16 months (anti-TNF-α group) versus 21 months (p = 0.52). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of treatment failure, corticosteroid sparing effect, visual acuity improvement or adverse events. Earlier control of ocular inflammation was achieved with anti-TNF-α agents than with DMARDs (p = 0.006). In relapsing patients, anti-TNF-α agents allowed better corticosteroid sparing (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION DMARDs could still be used as first-line therapy for non-infectious non-anterior uveitis after corticosteroid therapy. However, anti-TNF-α agents could be proposed as an alternative in cases of severe inflammation or initial high level of steroid dependency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Leclercq
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France.
| | - Vincent Langlois
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Jacques Monod, Le Havre, France
| | - Nicolas Girszyn
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| | - Maëlle Le Besnerais
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France; INSERM U1096, UFR Santé, Rouen University, Rouen, France
| | - Ygal Benhamou
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France; INSERM U1096, UFR Santé, Rouen University, Rouen, France
| | - Hervé Levesque
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France; INSERM U1096, UFR Santé, Rouen University, Rouen, France
| | - Marc Muraine
- Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| | - Julie Gueudry
- Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France; EA7510, UFR Santé, Rouen University, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee ACH, Riedl M, Frommer L, Diana T, Kahaly GJ. Systemic safety analysis of mycophenolate in Graves' orbitopathy. J Endocrinol Invest 2020; 43:767-777. [PMID: 31834613 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-019-01161-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The dual antiproliferative mechanism of mycophenolate appears to be beneficial in Graves' orbitopathy (GO). METHODS Safety data from the two published mycophenolate trials and the original database of the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) trial were systematically analyzed. Treatment efficacy stratified by individual visual parameters of activity and severity were compared. RESULTS A total of 129 adverse events (AE) involving 50 patients (29.4%) were noted among all mycophenolate-treated patients. Mycophenolate sodium plus intravenous glucocorticoid (MPS + GC) group of the EUGOGO trial recorded significantly more AE (55.4% versus 4.6% of patients affected) and serious adverse events (SAE) (12.5% versus 0%) than mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) group of the Chinese trial. None of those SAE was side effect (SE). Most SE in MPS + GC group were mild. Gastrointestinal disorders, infection and liver dysfunction affected 8.8%, 7.1% and 1.2% of all mycophenolate-treated patients (versus 5.4%, 5.4% and 1.2% of all patients on GC monotherapy, respectively). MPS + GC did not significantly increase the risk of infection or liver dysfunction when compared to GC monotherapy. No cytopenia, serious infection or treatment-related mortality was reported. The much higher AE rates of mycophenolate trials in other autoimmune diseases or transplantations suggested that major mycophenolate toxicities were mostly dose- and duration dependent. Mycophenolate, either as monotherapy or as combination, achieved better overall response than GC monotherapy. CONCLUSION The risk-benefit ratio of low-dose mycophenolate treatment in active moderate-to-severe GO is highly favorable given its reassuring safety profile with low rate of mild-to-moderate SE and promising efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C H Lee
- Department of Medicine I, Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center, Langenbeckstreet 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Riedl
- Department of Medicine I, Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center, Langenbeckstreet 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - L Frommer
- Department of Medicine I, Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center, Langenbeckstreet 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - T Diana
- Department of Medicine I, Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center, Langenbeckstreet 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - G J Kahaly
- Department of Medicine I, Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center, Langenbeckstreet 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hassan M, Karkhur S, Bae JH, Halim MS, Ormaechea MS, Onghanseng N, Nguyen NV, Afridi R, Sepah YJ, Do DV, Nguyen QD. New therapies in development for the management of non-infectious uveitis: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020; 47:396-417. [PMID: 30938012 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 03/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Uveitis is a spectrum of inflammatory disorders characterized by ocular inflammation and is one of the leading causes of preventable visual loss. The main aim of the treatment of uveitis is to control the inflammation, prevent recurrences of the disease and preserve vision while minimizing the adverse effects associated with the therapeutic agents. Initial management of uveitis relies heavily on the use of corticosteroids. However, monotherapy with high-dose corticosteroids is associated with side effects and cannot be maintained long term. Therefore, steroid-sparing agents are needed to decrease the burden of steroid therapy. Currently, the therapeutic approach for non-infectious uveitis (NIU) consists of a step-ladder strategy with the first-line option being corticosteroids in various formulations followed by the use of first-, second- and third-line agents in cases with suboptimal steroid response. Unfortunately, the agents currently at our disposal have limitations such as having a narrow therapeutic window along with their own individual potential side-effect profiles. Therefore, research has been targeted to identify newer drugs as well as new uses for older drugs that target specific pathways in the inflammatory response. Such efforts are made in order to provide targeted and safer therapy with reduced side effects and greater efficacy. Several specially designed molecular antibodies are currently in various phases of investigations that can potentially halt the inflammation in patients with NIU. In the review, we have provided a comprehensive overview of the current and upcoming therapeutic options for patients with NIU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Hassan
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Samendra Karkhur
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.,Department of Ophthalmology, Sadguru Netra Chikitsalaya, Chitrakoot, India
| | - Jeong H Bae
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.,Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Maria S Ormaechea
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.,Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Neil Onghanseng
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Nam V Nguyen
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Rubbia Afridi
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Yasir J Sepah
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Diana V Do
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Quan D Nguyen
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ormaechea MS, Hassan M, Onghanseng N, Park JH, Mahajan S, Al-Kirwi KY, Uludag G, Halim MS, Schlaen A, Sepah YJ, Do DV, Nguyen QD. Safety of systemic therapy for noninfectious uveitis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2019; 18:1219-1235. [PMID: 31801415 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1692810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: The treatment strategies for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) aim to achieve disease remission, prevention of recurrences, and preserving vision, while minimizing the side effects associated with the therapies used.Areas covered: The index review aims to provide a detailed overview of the adverse events and safety parameters associated with the systemic therapies for the management of the NIU.Expert opinion: Despite being the cornerstone of management of acute cases of NIU, long-term corticosteroid use is associated with multi-system side effects, requiring the use of steroid-sparing agents. Adalimumab was recently approved by the FDA for the management of NIU based on the results of VISUAL studies. Similarly, newer drugs targeting various aspects of the inflammatory cascade are being developed. However, until we completely understand the molecular pathways of the inflammatory diseases, the therapeutic profile of these newer agents needs to be broad enough to suppress inflammatory cascade and narrow enough to spare normal cellular processes. Another strategy that has shown some potential in decreasing the systemic side effects is to provide local drug delivery. Therefore, the future of management of NIU is very bright with many novel therapeutic agents and strategies of drug delivery on the horizon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Soledad Ormaechea
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Muhammad Hassan
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Neil Onghanseng
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Jung Hyun Park
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Khalid Yusuf Al-Kirwi
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, Imamein Khadhimein Medical City University Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Gunay Uludag
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Ariel Schlaen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Yasir J Sepah
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Diana V Do
- Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zagora SL, Cornish EE, Symes RJ, Younan C, Sammel A, Wakefield D, McCluskey P. Inflammatory eye and rheumatic disease. Int J Rheum Dis 2019; 22:2091-2095. [PMID: 31797538 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.13714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia L Zagora
- Uveitis Unit, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Save Sight Institute & Discipline of Ophthalmology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elisa E Cornish
- Uveitis Unit, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Save Sight Institute & Discipline of Ophthalmology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard J Symes
- Uveitis Unit, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Save Sight Institute & Discipline of Ophthalmology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christine Younan
- Uveitis Unit, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Save Sight Institute & Discipline of Ophthalmology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anthony Sammel
- Save Sight Institute & Discipline of Ophthalmology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Rheumatology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Denis Wakefield
- Immunology Department, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter McCluskey
- Uveitis Unit, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Save Sight Institute & Discipline of Ophthalmology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gangaputra SS, Newcomb CW, Joffe MM, Dreger K, Begum H, Artornsombudh P, Pujari SS, Daniel E, Sen HN, Suhler EB, Thorne JE, Bhatt NP, Foster CS, Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Levy-Clarke GA, Kempen JH. Comparison Between Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil Monotherapy for the Control of Noninfectious Ocular Inflammatory Diseases. Am J Ophthalmol 2019; 208:68-75. [PMID: 31344346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 07/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to methotrexate (MTX) as corticosteroid-sparing therapy for ocular inflammatory diseases. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of cohort study data. METHODS Participants were identified from the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases Cohort Study. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained via medical record review. The study included 352 patients who were taking single-agent immunosuppression with MTX or MMF at 4 tertiary uveitis clinics. Marginal structural models (MSM)-derived statistical weighting created a virtual population with covariates and censoring patterns balanced across alternative treatments. With this methodological approach, the results estimate what would have happened had none of the patients stopped their treatment. Survival analysis with stabilized MSM-derived weights simulated a clinical trial comparing MMF vs MTX for noninfectious inflammatory eye disorders. The primary outcome was complete control of inflammation on prednisone ≤10 mg/day, sustained for ≥30 days. RESULTS The time to success was shorter (more favorable) for MMF than MTX (hazard ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.99). Adjusting for covariates, the proportion achieving success was higher at every point in time for MMF than MTX from 2 to 8 months, then converges at 9 months. The onset of corticosteroid-sparing success took more than 3 months for most patients in both groups. Outcomes of treatment (MMF vs MTX) were similar across all anatomic sites of inflammation. The incidence of stopping therapy for toxicity was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that, on average, MMF may be faster than MTX in achieving corticosteroid-sparing success in ocular inflammatory diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sapna S Gangaputra
- Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
| | - Craig W Newcomb
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marshall M Joffe
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kurt Dreger
- Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hosne Begum
- Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Pichaporn Artornsombudh
- Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Somdech Phra Pinkloa Hospital, Royal Thai Navy, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Ophthalmology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Siddharth S Pujari
- Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA; Siddharth Netralaya, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
| | - Ebenezer Daniel
- Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - H Nida Sen
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric B Suhler
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; Portland Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jennifer E Thorne
- Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nirali P Bhatt
- Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - C Stephen Foster
- Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas A Jabs
- Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Departments of Ophthalmology and Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert B Nussenblatt
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - James T Rosenbaum
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; Legacy Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - John H Kempen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MCM Eye Unit/Ophthalmology, MyungSung Christian Medical Center and MyungSung Medical School, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Berlinberg EJ, Gonzales JA, Doan T, Acharya NR. Association Between Noninfectious Uveitis and Psychological Stress. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019; 137:199-205. [PMID: 30520957 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.5893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Uveitis involves dysregulation of the ocular immune system. Stress has been shown to affect immune function, but it is unclear whether there is an association between stress and uveitis. Objective To determine whether having uveitis is associated with psychological stress. Design, Setting, and Participants A cross-sectional, case-control study including a self-administered survey, medical records review, and diurnal salivary cortisol test was conducted at a university-based uveitis clinic and comprehensive eye clinic. Participants included 146 consecutive adults with noninfectious uveitis and age-matched controls with no eye disease. The study was conducted from December 1, 2017, to March 14, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Participants completed the self-administered, Cohen 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), a demographics questionnaire. Responses to each question were categorized on a 5-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 (no stress) to 40 (high stress). In addition, participants submitted 3 salivary cortisol samples. Those with uveitis were classified as having recently active or controlled disease through medical records review. The prespecified primary analysis was a linear regression of PSS-10 score and uveitis correcting for age, sex, educational level, employment, and median income. Secondary analyses included comparing PSS-10 scores in patients with recently active and controlled uveitis, determining predictors of stress, and comparing diurnal salivary cortisol between uveitis and control groups. Results Of 146 eligible patients, 17 declined participation and 9 consented but were excluded because they did not complete both questionnaires, resulting in 120 patients (80 uveitis; 40 controls) in the final analysis. Eighty participants (66.7%) were women, and 70 (58.3%) were white. Median age was 40 years (interquartile range, 29-59 years). Having uveitis was associated with a 4.3-point increase in PSS-10 score (95% CI, 1.8 to 6.9; P = .002). There was no significant difference in PSS-10 scores between patients with recently active and controlled uveitis (1.0 point greater for patients with active uveitis; 95% CI, -2.0 to 3.9; P = .52). Factors associated with increased PSS-10 score in patients with uveitis included female sex (coefficient, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.5; P = .002), current immunomodulatory therapy (coefficient, 2.5; 95% CI, -0.3 to 5.2; P = .08), history of depression (coefficient, 3.8; 95% CI, 0.8 to 6.8; P = .02), and having posterior or panuveitis (coefficient, 2.6; 95% CI, 0.8 to 4.4; P = .006). Of the 70 participants (58.3%) who had testable samples for cortisol analysis, diurnal salivary cortisol levels did not significantly differ between uveitis and nonuveitis groups. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that patients with uveitis have higher levels of psychological stress compared with controls, yet no significant difference was identified in the stress of patients with active vs controlled uveitis. Consequently, comprehensive treatment for noninfectious uveitis may be able to address the psychological results of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John A Gonzales
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Thuy Doan
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Nisha R Acharya
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zagora S, McCluskey P. Biologic therapy for uveitis: a new beginning. Intern Med J 2019; 49:1349-1351. [PMID: 31713337 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Zagora
- Discipline of Clinical Ophthalmology and Eye Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter McCluskey
- Discipline of Clinical Ophthalmology and Eye Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pleyer U, Pohlmann D, Kardeş E, Poddubnyy D, Rademacher J. Emerging drugs for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2019; 24:173-190. [PMID: 31498689 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2019.1663823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Uveitis is a leading cause of visual impairment and a significant burden of blindness. Although corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents have been successfully used, these are non-specific, and their long-term use may induce significant adverse effects. Areas covered: This article discusses existing local and systemic applied treatments for ocular inflammation including corticosteroids, non-biologic, and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). Potential drugs being studied in clinical trials are introduced for both local and systemic use. Expert opinion: Treatment options for uveitis continue to expand. Still, more efforts and research are needed to better understand the mechanisms potentially leading to clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Pleyer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Campus Virchow, Charité , Berlin , Germany
| | - Dominika Pohlmann
- Department of Ophthalmology, Campus Virchow, Charité , Berlin , Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health , Berlin , Germany
| | - Esra Kardeş
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital , Istanbul , Turkey
| | - Denis Poddubnyy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology , Berlin , Germany.,Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Centre , Berlin , Germany
| | - Judith Rademacher
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health , Berlin , Germany.,Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology , Berlin , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rathinam SR, Gonzales JA, Thundikandy R, Kanakath A, Murugan SB, Vedhanayaki R, Lim LL, Suhler EB, Al-Dhibi HA, Doan T, Keenan JD, Rao MM, Ebert CD, Nguyen HH, Kim E, Porco TC, Acharya NR. Effect of Corticosteroid-Sparing Treatment With Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Methotrexate on Inflammation in Patients With Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 322:936-945. [PMID: 31503307 PMCID: PMC6737523 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.12618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are commonly used immunomodulatory therapies for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious uveitis, but there is uncertainty about which drug is more effective. OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of methotrexate and mycophenolate for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial screened 265 adults with noninfectious uveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy from 9 referral eye centers in India, the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and Mexico between August 22, 2013, and August 16, 2017. Follow-up ended on August 20, 2018. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive oral methotrexate, 25 mg weekly (n = 107), or oral mycophenolate mofetil, 3 g daily (n = 109). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was treatment success at 6 months, which was defined as having control of inflammation in both eyes, no more than 7.5 mg prednisone daily and less than or equal to 2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1%, and no treatment failure due to safety or intolerability. Patients underwent follow-up to 12 months while receiving the same treatment or switched to the other antimetabolite, depending on their 6-month outcome. RESULTS Among 216 patients who were randomized (median age, 38 years; 135 (62.5%) women), 194 (89.8%) completed follow-up through 6 months. Treatment success occurred in 64 (66.7%) patients in the methotrexate group vs 56 (57.1%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 9.5% [95% CI, -5.3% to 21.8%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.50 [95% CI, 0.81 to 2.81]; P = .20). Among patients with posterior uveitis or panuveitis, treatment success was achieved in 58 (74.4%) in the methotrexate group vs 42 (55.3%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 19.1% [95% CI, 3.6% to 30.6%]; OR, 2.35 [95% CI, 1.16 to 4.90]; P = .02); whereas among patients with intermediate uveitis treatment success occurred in 6 (33.3%) in the methotrexate group vs 14 (63.6%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, -30.3% [95% CI, -51.6% to 1.1%]; OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.08 to 1.05]; P = .07; P for interaction = .004). Elevated liver enzymes were the most common nonserious laboratory adverse event, occurring in 14 patients (13.0%) in the methotrexate group and 8 patients (7.4%) in the mycophenolate group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults with noninfectious uveitis, the use of mycophenolate mofetil compared with methotrexate as first-line corticosteroid-sparing treatment did not result in superior control of inflammation. Further research is needed to determine if either drug is more effective based on the anatomical subtype of uveitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01829295.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. R. Rathinam
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India
| | - John A. Gonzales
- F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Radhika Thundikandy
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India
| | - Anuradha Kanakath
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Coimbatore, India
| | - S. Bala Murugan
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, India
| | - R. Vedhanayaki
- Uvea Services, Aravind Eye Hospitals and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India
| | - Lyndell L. Lim
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eric B. Suhler
- Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Hassan A. Al-Dhibi
- Division of Vitreoretinal Surgery and Uveitis, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Thuy Doan
- F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jeremy D. Keenan
- F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Maya M. Rao
- F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Caleb D. Ebert
- F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Hieu H. Nguyen
- F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Eric Kim
- F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Travis C. Porco
- F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Nisha R. Acharya
- F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Touhami S, Diwo E, Sève P, Trad S, Bielefeld P, Sène D, Abad S, Brézin A, Quartier P, Koné Paut I, Weber M, Chiquet C, Errera MH, Sellam J, Cacoub P, Kaplanski G, Kodjikian L, Bodaghi B, Saadoun D. Expert opinion on the use of biological therapy in non-infectious uveitis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2019; 19:477-490. [PMID: 30888881 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1595578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Conventional immunosuppressive drugs, anti-TNF alpha treatments and biotherapies are increasingly being used in non-infectious uveitis. AREAS COVERED The present work was led by a multidisciplinary panel of experts, including internal medicine specialists, rheumatologists and ophthalmologists, and proposes an extensive review on the use of biological agents in non-infectious uveitis. EXPERT OPINION In case of dependency to steroids or sight-threatening disease, conventional immunosuppressive drugs (methotrexate, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil) and/or biological therapies such as anti-TNF alpha treatments (adalimumab, infliximab) can be used to achieve and maintain disease quiescence. Interferon is an efficient immunomodulatory drug that can be proposed as second-line therapy in specific indications (eg. refractory macular edema, sight-threatening Behçet's uveitis). Other biologics, especially tocilizumab, are showing promising results. Local treatments (steroids, sirolimus etc.) can be used as adjuvant therapies in case of unilateral relapse. Therapeutic response must always be evaluated by clinical examination and appropriate ancillary investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Touhami
- a Ophthalmology Department , DHU ViewRestore, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital , Paris , France
| | - Eléonore Diwo
- a Ophthalmology Department , DHU ViewRestore, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital , Paris , France
| | - Pascal Sève
- b Internal Medicine Department , Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon , Lyon Cedex 04 , France.,c Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud , Université Claude Bernard-Lyon 1 , Lyon , France
| | - Salim Trad
- d Internal Medicine Department , Hôpital Ambroise Paré , Boulogne-Billancourt , France
| | - Philip Bielefeld
- e Internal Medicine and systemic diseases department (Médecine Interne 2) , Dijon University hospital , Dijon , France
| | - Damien Sène
- f Internal Medicine Department , Lariboisière Hospital , Paris , France.,g INSERM UMR , Paris Diderot University , Paris , France
| | - Sebastien Abad
- h Internal Medicine Department , Hopital Avicenne , Bobigny , France.,i Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine SMBH , Université Paris 13 , Bobigny , France.,j Faculté de médecine , Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité , Bobigny , France
| | - Antoine Brézin
- k Ophthalmology Department, Hôpital Cochin , Paris Descartes University , Paris , France
| | - Pierre Quartier
- l Unité d'Immunologie-Hématologie et Rhumatologie Pédiatriques, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades , Paris-Descartes University, Institut IMAGINE, Centre de référence des maladies rhumatologiques inflammatoires et auto-immunes systémiques rares de l'enfant (RAISE) , Paris , France
| | - Isabelle Koné Paut
- m Paediatric Rheumatology Department , centre de référence des maladies autoinflammatoires et de l'amylose inflammatoire, CEREMAIA, Bicêtre Hospital , Le Kremlin-Bicêtre , France
| | - Michel Weber
- n Ophthalmology Department , Nantes University Hospital , Nantes , France
| | - Christophe Chiquet
- o Ophthalmology Department , Grenoble Alpes University Hospital , La Tronche , France
| | - Marie-Hélène Errera
- p Ophthalmology Department , Quinze-Vingts National Eye Hospital , Paris , France
| | - Jérémie Sellam
- q Rheumatology Department, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, CRSA Inserm UMRS_938, DHU i2B , Sorbonne Université , Paris , France
| | - Patrice Cacoub
- r Inflammation-Immunopathology-Biotherapy Department (DHU i2B) , Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7211 , Paris , France.,s Inflammation-Immunopathology-BiotherapyDepartment , INSERM, UMR_S 959 , Paris , France.,t Inflammation-Immunopathology-BiotherapyDepartment , CNRS, FRE3632 , Paris , France.,u Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Centre national de référence des maladies autoimmunes systémiques rares, Centre national de référence des maladies autoinflammatoires et de l'amylose , AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière , Paris , France
| | - Gilles Kaplanski
- v Internal Medicine and Clinical immunology Department, Hôpital de la Conception , Aix-Marseille Université , Marseille , France
| | - Laurent Kodjikian
- w Department of Ophthalmology , Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I , Lyon , France.,x CNRS UMR 5510 Mateis , France
| | - Bahram Bodaghi
- a Ophthalmology Department , DHU ViewRestore, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital , Paris , France
| | - David Saadoun
- r Inflammation-Immunopathology-Biotherapy Department (DHU i2B) , Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7211 , Paris , France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tallouzi MO, Moore DJ, Barry RJ, Calvert M, Mathers J, Murray PI, Denniston AK. The Effectiveness of Pharmacological Agents for the Treatment of Uveitic Macular Edema (UMO): A Systematic Review. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2019; 27:658-680. [PMID: 30811272 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1569243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of effectiveness of pharmacological therapies for treatment of Uveitic Macular Edema (UMO). Method/Design: Comparative studies of pharmacological therapies in patients with UMO were identified in Cochrane CENTRAL/MEDLINE/EMBASE/CINAHL/trials registers (February 2017). PROSPERO registration: CRD42015019170. Results: Thirty-one studies were included. Corticosteroids were the most frequently studied (n = 20). Corticosteroids (all forms) were consistently of greater/equal efficacy to active comparators; for anti-VEGF (n = 4) improvement, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were mostly less than local corticosteroid injection; for interferon (n = 1) improvement BCVA and CMT were greater than the comparator of methotrexate; for topical indomethacin (n = 1) improvement, BCVA and CMT were greater than placebo. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and vitamin E (n = 5) were not effective for these outcomes. Conclusion: The review highlights areas where the evidence base is still lacking, and appropriately focused trials are needed to inform best treatment to tackle this sight-threatening condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad O Tallouzi
- a Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.,b Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - David J Moore
- c Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Robert J Barry
- d Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- b Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.,c Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Jonathan Mathers
- b Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.,c Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Philip I Murray
- d Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- b Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.,e Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham , University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Damodaran K, Sridharan S. Immunosuppressives and biologicals in uveitis: The way forward – Current concepts. TNOA JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC SCIENCE AND RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/tjosr.tjosr_14_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
42
|
Rice JB, White AG, Scarpati LM, Wan GJ, Nelson WW. The burden of non-infectious intraocular inflammatory eye diseases: a systematic literature review. Curr Med Res Opin 2018; 34:2095-2103. [PMID: 30112931 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1512961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-infectious inflammatory eye diseases (IEDs), although rare, are complex and varied and may result in detrimental effects. A systematic literature review was conducted on the clinical outcome and economic burden of IED. METHODS The Ovid search platform (Wolters Kluwer) was used to access scientific literature databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane libraries, Health Technology Assessment and the NHS Economic Evaluation database. The search strategy targeted clinical and economic outcomes research in 2009-2016. Titles and abstracts resulting from inclusion criteria were screened, and two reviewers independently extracted relevant information from the selected full-text articles. RESULTS Thirty-nine papers met the inclusion criteria - 21 clinical trials, 7 database analyses, 6 non-systematic literature reviews with expert commentary, 3 chart reviews, and 2 surveys - which assessed steroids, immunosuppressants, implants and biologics. Patients experienced considerable morbidity, much of which was associated with corticosteroid use. The average annual healthcare costs of patients with IED were $13,728 to $32,268 in 2009 US dollars, which amounted to 3.1 to 8.3 times that of patients without IED. Steroid-releasing intraocular implants were associated with higher up-front costs, close monitoring requirements, potential for implant removal and increased rates of adverse ocular events than systemic steroids. CONCLUSIONS IEDs are rare and complex conditions that threaten eyesight and impose considerable morbidity as well as a substantial economic burden. This review confirms that further research is needed to more fully explore the burden of IED and treatment-related adverse events, as well as appropriate means for clinicians to intensify treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - George J Wan
- b Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals , Bedminster , NJ , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Arevalo JF, Lasave AF, Gupta V, Kozak I, Al Shamsi HN, Al Suliman SM, Al Rushood AA, Al-Zahrani YA, Al-Mahmood AM, Al Dhibi HA. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of 308 Panuveitis Patients over 10 Years: Results from the KKESH Uveitis Survey Study Group. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2018; 27:1296-1304. [DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2018.1523436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J. Fernando Arevalo
- Retina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Vitreoretinal and Uveitis Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Andres F. Lasave
- Retina and Vitreous Department, Clinica Privada de Ojos, Buenos Aires, Mar del Plata, Argentina
| | - Vishali Gupta
- Vitreoretinal and Uveitis Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Igor Kozak
- Vitreoretinal and Uveitis Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Hanan Nasser Al Shamsi
- Vitreoretinal and Uveitis Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Abdulaziz Adel Al Rushood
- Vitreoretinal and Uveitis Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Yahya A. Al-Zahrani
- Vitreoretinal and Uveitis Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ammar M. Al-Mahmood
- Anterior Segment and Uveitis Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan A. Al Dhibi
- Vitreoretinal and Uveitis Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
LaMattina KC, Escott SM, Malalis JF, Mai D, Harada Y, Goldstein DA. The Influence of Race and Sex on the Side Effect Profile of Methotrexate in the Treatment of Uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2018; 27:1160-1164. [DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2018.1498905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kara C. LaMattina
- Ophthalmology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah M. Escott
- Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Julia F. Malalis
- Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Mai
- Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Debra A. Goldstein
- Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zu Hoerste MM, Walscheid K, Tappeiner C, Zurek-Imhoff B, Heinz C, Heiligenhaus A. The effect of methotrexate and sulfasalazine on the course of HLA-B27-positive anterior uveitis: results from a retrospective cohort study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 256:1985-1992. [PMID: 30069748 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-4082-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effect of methotrexate (MTX) or sulfasalazine (SSZ) on the course of HLA-B27-positive, remitting acute anterior uveitis (AAU). METHODS Forty-six patients with HLA-B27-positive AAU with or without associated systemic rheumatic disease either receiving MTX (n = 20), SSZ (n = 13), or no systemic immunomodulating treatment (Ctrl; n = 13) were studied retrospectively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), AAU relapse rate, and occurrence of uveitis-related ocular complications were analyzed at baseline (BL) and at 12-month follow-up (FU). RESULTS Groups did not differ regarding age, gender, and presence of associated systemic diseases. BCVA at baseline was significantly worse in patients receiving MTX (logMAR 0.39 ± 0.4) than in those treated with SSZ (0.17 ± 0.2; P = 0.05) or in controls (Ctrl; 0.14 ± 0.2; P = 0.009). At the 12-month endpoint, MTX treatment was associated with significantly improved BCVA (0.18 ± 0.4 logMAR; P = 0.004). In contrast, BCVA did not significantly change in patients treated with SSZ (0.17 ± 0.3 logMAR) or in the controls (0.11 ± 0.2 logMAR). The annual uveitis relapse rate significantly decreased with MTX (BL 3.6 ± 2.4 relapses to FU 0.7 ± 0.8; P = 0.0001) and SSZ (BL 3.6 ± 1.9 to FU 1.8 ± 2.4, P < 0.01), but not in the controls (BL 1.9 ± 1.4 vs 1.9 ± 1.7 FU). The complication rate was slightly reduced with MTX (BL 1.75 ± 1.2 complications present versus FU 1.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.09) but not with SSZ (BL 0.9 ± 0.8 to FU 1.3 ± 1.4; P = 0.4) or in the controls (BL and FU 1.0 ± 0.95; P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS MTX and SSZ reduced the uveitis relapse rate in HLA-B27-positive AAU patients, with MTX showing a beneficial effect on AAU-related macular edema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Meyer Zu Hoerste
- Department of Ophthalmology and Ophtha-Lab at St. Franziskus Hospital, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145, Muenster, Germany
| | - Karoline Walscheid
- Department of Ophthalmology and Ophtha-Lab at St. Franziskus Hospital, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145, Muenster, Germany.
| | - Christoph Tappeiner
- Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Beatrix Zurek-Imhoff
- Department of Ophthalmology and Ophtha-Lab at St. Franziskus Hospital, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145, Muenster, Germany
| | - Carsten Heinz
- Department of Ophthalmology and Ophtha-Lab at St. Franziskus Hospital, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145, Muenster, Germany.,University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Arnd Heiligenhaus
- Department of Ophthalmology and Ophtha-Lab at St. Franziskus Hospital, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145, Muenster, Germany.,University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Squires H, Poku E, Bermejo I, Cooper K, Stevens J, Hamilton J, Wong R, Denniston A, Pearce I, Quhill F. A systematic review and economic evaluation of adalimumab and dexamethasone for treating non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis or panuveitis in adults. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-170. [PMID: 29183563 DOI: 10.3310/hta21680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis and panuveitis are a heterogeneous group of inflammatory eye disorders. Management includes local and systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and biological drugs. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous adalimumab (Humira®; AbbVie Ltd, Maidenhead, UK) and a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®; Allergan Ltd, Marlow, UK) in adults with non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis or panuveitis. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases and clinical trials registries including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched to June 2016, with an update search carried out in October 2016. REVIEW METHODS Review methods followed published guidelines. A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone and adalimumab, each compared with current practice, from a NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective over a lifetime horizon, parameterised with published evidence. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5%. Substantial sensitivity analyses were undertaken. RESULTS Of the 134 full-text articles screened, three studies (four articles) were included in the clinical effectiveness review. Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) [VISUAL I (active uveitis) and VISUAL II (inactive uveitis)] compared adalimumab with placebo, with limited standard care also provided in both arms. Time to treatment failure (reduced visual acuity, intraocular inflammation, new vascular lesions) was longer in the adalimumab group than in the placebo group, with a hazard ratio of 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 0.70; p < 0.001] in the VISUAL I trial and 0.57 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.84; p = 0.004) in the VISUAL II trial. The adalimumab group showed a significantly greater improvement than the placebo group in the 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) composite score in the VISUAL I trial (mean difference 4.20; p = 0.010) but not the VISUAL II trial (mean difference 2.12; p = 0.16). Some systemic adverse effects occurred more frequently with adalimumab than with placebo. One RCT [HURON (active uveitis)] compared a single 0.7-mg dexamethasone implant against a sham procedure, with limited standard care also provided in both arms. Dexamethasone provided significant benefits over the sham procedure at 8 and 26 weeks in the percentage of patients with a vitreous haze score of zero (p < 0.014), the mean best corrected visual acuity improvement (p ≤ 0.002) and the percentage of patients with a ≥ 5-point improvement in VFQ-25 score (p < 0.05). Raised intraocular pressure and cataracts occurred more frequently with dexamethasone than with the sham procedure. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for one dexamethasone implant in one eye for a combination of patients with unilateral and bilateral uveitis compared with limited current practice, as per the HURON trial, was estimated to be £19,509 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The ICER of adalimumab for patients with mainly bilateral uveitis compared with limited current practice, as per the VISUAL trials, was estimated to be £94,523 and £317,547 per QALY gained in active and inactive uveitis respectively. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the rate of blindness has the biggest impact on the model results. The interventions may be more cost-effective in populations in which there is a greater risk of blindness. LIMITATIONS The clinical trials did not fully reflect clinical practice. Thirteen additional studies of clinically relevant comparator treatments were identified; however, network meta-analysis was not feasible. The model results are highly uncertain because of the limited evidence base. CONCLUSIONS Two RCTs of systemic adalimumab and one RCT of a unilateral, single dexamethasone implant showed significant benefits over placebo or a sham procedure. The ICERs for adalimumab were estimated to be above generally accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone was estimated to fall below standard thresholds. However, there is substantial uncertainty around the model assumptions. In future work, primary research should compare dexamethasone and adalimumab with current treatments over the long term and in important subgroups and consider how short-term improvements relate to long-term effects on vision. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016041799. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazel Squires
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edith Poku
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Inigo Bermejo
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Katy Cooper
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Stevens
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean Hamilton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ruth Wong
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Ian Pearce
- St Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fahd Quhill
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ali S, Kharel Sitaula R, Biswas J. Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Intermediate Uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2018; 27:851-857. [DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2018.1453524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sowkath Ali
- Uvea Department, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India
| | - Ranju Kharel Sitaula
- Department of Ophthalmology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, B. P. Koirala Lions Centre for Ophthalmic Studies, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Jyotirmay Biswas
- Medical and Vision Research Foundations, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Diwo E, Sève P, Trad S, Bielefeld P, Sène D, Abad S, Brézin A, Quartier P, Koné Paut I, Weber M, Chiquet C, Errera MH, Sellam J, Cacoub P, Kaplanski G, Kodjikian L, Bodaghi B, Saadoun D. [Therapeutic strategy for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis proposed by an expert panel]. Rev Med Interne 2018; 39:687-698. [PMID: 29610003 DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2018.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Conventional immunosuppressive drugs, anti-TNF alpha and other biotherapies used in clinical practice are capable of controlling non-infectious anterior uveitis, posterior uveitis and panuveitis. The present work has been led by a multidisciplinary panel of experts, internists, rheumatologists and ophthalmologists and is based on a review of the literature. In case of corticodependency or sight-threatening disease, conventional immunosuppressive drugs (methotrexate, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil) and/or anti-TNF alpha (adalimumab, infliximab) are used to achieve and maintain remission. Interferon is an efficient immunomodulatory treatment, as a second-line therapy, for some therapeutic indications (refractory macular edema, Behçet's vascularitis). Other biologics, especially tocilizumab, are showing promising results. Local treatments (corticosteroids, sirolimus etc.) are adjuvant therapies in case of unilateral inflammatory relapse. Therapeutic response must be evaluated precisely by clinical examination and repeated complementary investigations (laser flare photometry, multimodal imaging, perimetry, electroretinography measures).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Diwo
- Ophthalmology department, DHU ViewRestore, Pitié Salpêtrière hospital, Paris, France
| | - P Sève
- Service de médecine interne, hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103, grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon cedex 04, France; Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud, université Claude Bernard-Lyon 1, France
| | - S Trad
- Service de médecine interne, hôpital Ambroise Paré, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - P Bielefeld
- Internal medicine and systemic diseases department, médecine interne 2, university hospital Dijon Bourgogne, France; Service de médecine interne, hôpital Avicenne, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bobigny, France; Faculté de médecine SMBH, université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Bobigny, France; UMR1125, LI2P, université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Bobigny, France
| | - D Sène
- Internal medicine department, Lariboisière hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; Inserm UMR 1149, Paris Diderot university, Paris, France
| | - S Abad
- Service de médecine interne, hôpital Avicenne, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bobigny, France; Faculté de médecine SMBH, université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Bobigny, France; UMR1125, LI2P, université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Bobigny, France
| | - A Brézin
- Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital Cochin, université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - P Quartier
- Unité d'immunologie-hématologie et rhumatologie pédiatriques, institut IMAGINE, centre de référence des maladies rhumatologiques inflammatoires et autoimmunes systémiques rares de l'enfant (RAISE), université Paris-Descartes university, hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, Assistance publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - I Koné Paut
- Paediatric rheumatology department, centre de références des maladies autoinflammatoires et de l'amylose inflammatoire, CEREMAIA, university of Paris Sud, Bicêtre hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - M Weber
- Department of ophthalmology, Nantes university, Nantes university hospital, Nantes, France
| | - C Chiquet
- Department of ophthalmology, Grenoble-Alpes university, Grenoble Alpes university hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - M H Errera
- Department of ophthalmology at Quinze-Vingts National Eye Hospital and DHU Sight Restore, Paris, France; Sorbonne universities, UPMC université Paris 06, Paris, France
| | - J Sellam
- Service de rhumatologie, CRSA Inserm UMRS_938, DHU i2B, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, France
| | - P Cacoub
- Inflammation-immunopathology-biotherapy department (DHU i2B), Sorbonne universités, UPMC université Paris 06, UMR 7211, 75005 Paris, France; Inserm, UMR_S 959, 75013 Paris, France; CNRS, FRE3632, 75005 Paris, France; Department of internal medicine and clinical immunology, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France; Centre national de référence des maladies autoimmunes systémiques rares, centre National de référence des maladies autoinflammatoires et de l'amylose, France
| | - G Kaplanski
- Service de médecine interne et immunologie clinique, Aix-Marseille université, hôpital de la conception, 147, boulevard Baille, 1305 Marseille, France
| | - L Kodjikian
- Department of ophthalmology, Croix-Rousse university hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, university of Lyon I, 69004 Lyon, France; CNRS UMR 5510 Mateis, 69621 Villeurbanne, France
| | - B Bodaghi
- Ophthalmology department, DHU ViewRestore, Pitié Salpêtrière hospital, Paris, France.
| | - D Saadoun
- Inflammation-immunopathology-biotherapy department (DHU i2B), Sorbonne universités, UPMC université Paris 06, UMR 7211, 75005 Paris, France; Inserm, UMR_S 959, 75013 Paris, France; CNRS, FRE3632, 75005 Paris, France; Department of internal medicine and clinical immunology, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France; Centre national de référence des maladies autoimmunes systémiques rares, centre National de référence des maladies autoinflammatoires et de l'amylose, France.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Background Sarcoidosis constitutes one of the leading causes of ocular inflammation. Chronic ocular sarcoidosis can affect any segment of the eye and its adnexa, producing a wide range of clinical manifestations and severity. If left untreated, permanent visual impairment or even blindness may ensue. Treatment approaches vary from topical therapy to systemic agents that induce immunosuppression to different levels according to disease severity. Objective To review the published literature on the management options for chronic ocular sarcoidosis and provide a comprehensive list of available treatment strategies, including the newer biologics. Summary Ocular disease remains a challenging aspect of sarcoidosis and may even be the presenting sign of the disease. Prompt and effective therapy may reverse visual damage and prevent permanent loss of vision. Because of the complexity of the disease, a multidisciplinary approach is often required, with a view to addressing both the ocular and other systemic manifestations of sarcoidosis. Recent data suggest that achieving overall optimal systemic control is of paramount importance in controlling eye inflammation as well. Cytotoxic immunosuppressive agents for refractory chronic ocular disease, as well as biologic anti-TNFα therapies, have advanced the management of chronic disease and should be considered corticosteroid-sparing strategies before the onset of significant steroid-induced morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artemis Matsou
- Second Department of Ophthalmology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantinos T Tsaousis
- Ophthalmology Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jabs DA. Immunosuppression for the Uveitides. Ophthalmology 2018; 125:193-202. [PMID: 28942074 PMCID: PMC5794515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The uveitides are a collection of more than 30 diseases characterized by intraocular inflammation. Many cases of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis, many cases of intermediate uveitis, and most cases of posterior and panuveitides requiring treatment are treated with corticosteroids and immunosuppression. Disease-specific, time-updated modeling of clinical data for several uveitides suggests superior prevention of ocular complications and visual outcomes with immunosuppression. These studies also suggest that oral corticosteroids at doses low enough for safe long-term therapy (i.e., <7.5 mg/day) are ineffective, implying that immunosuppression should be part of the initial regimen. The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial and Follow-up Study was a randomized comparative effectiveness trial comparing systemic therapy with oral corticosteroids and immunosuppression with regional corticosteroid treatment. It demonstrated that, when used properly, oral corticosteroids and immunosuppression can be given safely for up to 7 years with no evident increased risk of systemic side effects compared with regional corticosteroid therapy, except for greater antibiotic use for infections. The Systemic Treatment for Eye Diseases (SITE) Cohort Study suggested long-term safety for this approach, when the immunosuppressive agents were antimetabolites or calcineurin inhibitors. Thus, oral corticosteroids and immunosuppression may be a preferred initial therapy for many noninfectious, intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides. Nonalkylating-agent immunosuppression has a low rate of sustained, drug-free remissions, <10%/year. Nonalkylating-agent immunosuppression for >3 years with control of the inflammation for >2 years is associated with a decreased risk of relapse after discontinuing immunosuppression. Alkylating agents can induce sustained drug-free remissions but likely increase the lifetime risk of cancer. Biologics, which target specific cytokines and pathways, hold promise for the future. Monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α have been studied most often, and one, adalimumab, is U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of noninfectious, intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas A Jabs
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|