Ophthalmic Manifestations of ROSAH (Retinal Dystrophy, Optic Nerve Edema, Splenomegaly, Anhidrosis, and Headache) Syndrome, an Inherited NF κB-Mediated Autoinflammatory Disease with Retinal Dystrophy

Electrodiagnostic tests of the visual pathway and applications in neuro-ophthalmology

This article describes the main visual electrodiagnostic tests relevant to neuro-ophthalmology practice, including the visual evoked potential (VEP), and the full-field, pattern and multifocal electroretinograms (ffERG; PERG; mfERG). The principles of electrophysiological interpretation are illustrated with reference to acquired and inherited optic neuropathies, and retinal disorders that may masquerade as optic neuropathy, including ffERG and PERG findings in cone and macular dystrophies, paraneoplastic and vascular retinopathies. Complementary VEP and PERG recordings are illustrated in demyelinating, ischaemic, nutritional (B12), and toxic (mercury, cobalt, and ethambutol-related) optic neuropathies and inherited disorders affecting mitochondrial function such as Leber hereditary optic neuropathy and dominant optic atrophy. The value of comprehensive electrophysiological phenotyping in syndromic diseases is highlighted in cases of SSBP1-related disease and ROSAH (Retinal dystrophy, Optic nerve oedema, Splenomegaly, Anhidrosis and Headache). The review highlights the value of different electrophysiological techniques, for the purposes of differential diagnosis and objective functional phenotyping.

Genetic and epigenetic dysregulation of innate immune mechanisms in autoinflammatory diseases

Dysregulation and hyperactivation of innate immune responses can lead to the onset of systemic autoinflammatory diseases. Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases are caused by inborn genetic errors and based on molecular mechanisms at play, can be divided into inflammasomopathies, interferonopathies, relopathies, protein misfolding, and endogenous antagonist deficiencies. On the other hand, more common autoinflammatory diseases are multifactorial, with both genetic and non-genetic factors playing an important role. During the last decade, long-term memory characteristics of innate immune responses have been described (also called trained immunity) that in physiological conditions provide enhanced host protection from pathogenic re-infection. However, if dysregulated, induction of trained immunity can become maladaptive, perpetuating chronic inflammatory activation. Here, we describe the mechanisms of genetic and epigenetic dysregulation of the innate immune system and maladaptive trained immunity that leads to the onset and perpetuation of the most common and recently described systemic autoinflammatory diseases.

Update on ocular manifestations of the main monogenic and polygenic autoinflammatory diseases

Autoinflammatory diseases include disorders with a genetic cause and also complex syndromes associated to polygenic or multifactorial factors. Eye involvement is present in many of them, with different extent and severity. The present review covers ophthalmological lesions in the most prevalent monogenic autoinflammatory diseases, including FMF (familial Mediterranean fever), TRAPS (TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome), CAPS (cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes), Blau syndrome, DADA2 (deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2), DITRA (deficiency of the interleukin-36 receptor antagonist), other monogenic disorders, including several ubiquitinopathies, interferonopathies, and the recently described ROSAH (retinal dystrophy, optic nerve edema, splenomegaly, anhidrosis, and headache) syndrome, and VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome. Among polygenic autoinflammatory diseases, ocular manifestations have been reviewed in Behçet's disease, PFAPA (periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis) syndrome, Still's disease and autoinflammatory bone diseases, which encompass CRMO (chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis) and SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis) syndrome.

Knowledge and Current Practices in Monogenic Uveitis: An International Survey by IUSG and AIDA Network

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to explore awareness, knowledge, and diagnostic/therapeutic practices in monogenic uveitis (mU) among uveitis experts.

METHODS

This is an explorative, cross-sectional survey study. An anonymous, semi-structured, electronic survey was delivered to uveitis experts from the Autoinflammatory Diseases Alliance (AIDA) Network and International Uveitis Study Group (IUSG). We included respondents answering ≥ 50% of the survey.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven participants rated their knowledge of mU as proficient (3.9%), adequate (15.6%), sufficient (16.9%), or poor (63.6%). When asked about the first mU gene they thought of, 60.4% mentioned NOD2, 3.9% mentioned NLRP3 or MEFV, and 49.4% provided incorrect or no answers. Success rates in clinical scenarios varied from 15.6% to 55.8% and were higher for ophthalmologists working in multidisciplinary teams (p < 0.01). Genetic testing was ordered for suspected mU by 41.6% of physicians. The availability of molecular techniques did not significantly differ based on geography (p > 0.05). The public healthcare system ensured a higher percentage of tests prescribed were obtained by patients compared to private insurances (p < 0.00). In terms of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors were the most familiar to uveitis experts. The difficulties with off-label therapy procedures were the primary barrier to DMARDs prescription for patients with mU and correlated inversely with the obtained/prescribed drug ratio for interleukin-1 (p < 0.01) and interleukin-6 (p < 0.01) inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey identifies proficiency areas, gaps, and opportunities for targeted improvements in patients care. The comprehensive outputs may inform evidence-based guidelines, empowering clinicians with standardized approaches, and drive an AIDA Network-IUSG unified effort to advance scientific knowledge and clinical practice.

ALPK1 mutants causing ROSAH syndrome or Spiradenoma are activated by human nucleotide sugars

The atypical protein kinase ALPK1 is activated by the bacterial nucleotide sugar ADP-heptose and phosphorylates TIFA to switch on a signaling pathway that combats microbial infection. In contrast, ALPK1 mutations cause two human diseases: the ALPK1[T237M] and ALPK1[Y254C] mutations underlie ROSAH syndrome (retinal dystrophy, optic nerve oedema, splenomegaly, anhidrosis, and migraine headache), while the ALPK1[V1092A] mutation accounts for 45% of spiradenoma and 30% of spiradenocarcinoma cases studied. In this study, we demonstrate that unlike wild-type (WT) ALPK1, the disease-causing ALPK1 mutants trigger the TIFA-dependent activation of an NF-κB/activator protein 1 reporter gene in the absence of ADP-heptose, which can be suppressed by either of two additional mutations in the ADP-heptose binding site that prevent the activation of WT ALPK1 by ADP-heptose. These observations are explained by our key finding that although ALPK1[T237M] and ALPK1[V1092A] are activated by bacterial ADP-heptose, they can also be activated by nucleotide sugars present in human cells (UDP-mannose, ADP-ribose, and cyclic ADP-ribose) which can be prevented by disruption of the ADP-heptose binding site. The ALPK1[V1092A] mutant was also activated by GDP-mannose, which did not activate ALPK1[T237M]. These are new examples of disease-causing mutations permitting the allosteric activation of an enzyme by endogenous molecules that the WT enzyme does not respond to. We propose that the loss of the specificity of ALPK1 for bacterial ADP-heptose underlies ROSAH syndrome and spiradenoma/spiradenocarcinoma caused by ALPK1 mutation.

Uveitis Associated with Monogenic Autoinflammatory Syndromes in Children

Monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes (MAISs), are caused by pathogenic genetic variants in the innate immune system, leading to dysregulation and aberrant inflammasome activation spontaneously or with minimal triggering. The diagnosis and treatment of MAISs can be intricate, relying on an increased recognition of potential differential diagnoses. This review examines the clinical features of MAIS, with a special focus on uveitis. It also evaluates treatment options and assesses the effects of activating molecular and cytokine pathways.

Update on autoinflammatory diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the concept of systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs) is still very young, our knowledge about them is exponentially growing. In the current review, we aim to discuss novel SAIDs and autoinflammatory pathways discovered in the last couple of years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in immunology and genetics have led to the discovery of new pathways involved in autoinflammation, as well as several new SAIDs, including retinal dystrophy, optic nerve edema, splenomegaly, anhidrosis, and migraine headache (ROSAH syndrome), vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked autoinflammatory somatic (VEXAS) syndrome, TBK1 deficiency, NEMO deleted exon 5 autoinflammatory syndrome (NDAS), and disabling pansclerotic morphea. Progress in immunobiology and genetics has also brought forth novel treatments for SAIDs. Personalized medicine has made significant progress in areas such as cytokine-targeted therapies and gene therapies. However, much work remains, especially in measuring and improving the quality of life in patients with SAIDs.

SUMMARY

In the current review, we discuss the novelties in the world of SAIDs, including mechanistic pathways of autoinflammation, pathogenesis, and treatment. We hope this review helps rheumatologists to gain an updated understanding of SAIDs.