Pathological risk factors stratification in pN3b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Focus on the number of positive nodes and extranodal extension

Radiology-Pathology Concordance and Prognostication of Nodal Features in pN+ Oral Cavity Cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aims of our study are to evaluate the diagnostic performance and prognostic value of radiological lymph node (LN) characteristics in pN+ oral cavity squamous carcinoma (OSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

pN+ OSCC treated between 2012 and 2020 were included. Preoperative imaging was reviewed by a single radiologist blinded to pathologic findings for the following nodal features: imaging-positive LN (iN+), laterality and total number, and image-identified extranodal extension (iENE). The sensitivity of iN+ for pN+ was calculated. The diagnostic performance of other nodal features was evaluated in the iN+ subgroup. The association of radiologic nodal features with overall survival (OS) was evaluated. Inter-rater kappa for radiologic nodal features was assessed in 100 randomly selected cases.

RESULTS

Of 406 pN+ OSCC, 288 were iN+. The sensitivity of iN+ for pN+ was 71% overall, and improved to 89% for pN+ LN >1.5 cm. Within iN+, sensitivity/specificity for LN size (>3 cm), total LN number (>4), and ENE were 0.44/0.95, 0.57/0.84, and 0.27/0.96, respectively. Sensitivity of iENE was higher in the subset, with major (>2 mm) versus minor (≤2 mm) pENE (43% vs. 13%, p = 0.001). Reduced OS was observed in iN+ versus iN- (p = 0.006), iENE+ versus iENE- (p = 0.004), LN size >3 versus ≤3 cm (p < 0.001), and higher LN number (p < 0.001). Inter-rater kappa for iN+, laterality, total LN number, and presence of iENE were 0.71, 0.57, 0.78, and 0.69, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that despite modest sensitivity of most radiological nodal features, the specificity of image-identified nodal features is high and their prognostic values are retained in pN+ OSCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3 (retrospective review comparing cases and controls) Laryngoscope, 2024.

Comparison of the 7th and revised 8th UICC editions (2020) for oral squamous cell carcinoma: How does the reclassification impact staging and survival?

Since its introduction in 1968, the TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) classification established by the International Union Against Cancer has provided a consistent framework for staging of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The introduction of the 8th edition in 2017 brought about significant modifications, encompassing the integration of depth of invasion (DOI) and extranodal extension (ENE) into the T and N classifications. Further, the UICC the criteria for the T3 and T4a categories were amended in 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of reclassification on staging and, subsequently, the survival of patients with OSCC. Primary OSCCs from 391 patients were classified according to the 7th and revised 8th UICC editions (2020). Stage migration was assessed, and stage-specific progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare the different stages. Cox-proportional hazard modeling was used to compare the two editions. Incorporating the DOI into the T classification resulted in an upstaging of 77 patients, constituting 19.69% of the cohort. In addition, 49 (12.53%) patients experienced an upstaging when considering ENE in the N classification. Consequently, 103 patients underwent upstaging in UICC staging, accounting for 21.74% of cases. Upstaging mainly occurred from stage III to IVA (26.92%) and from stage IVA to IVB (31.78%). Upon comparing the categories in survival analysis, significant differences in OS and PFS were especially observed between stage IVB and lower stages. When examining the hazard ratios, it became evident that UICC 8 stage IVB is burdened by a 5.59-fold greater risk of disease progression than stage I. Furthermore, UICC 8 stage IVB exhibits a 3.83 times higher likelihood of death than stage I disease. We demonstrated significant stage migration from the 7th to the revised 8th UICC edition. Overall, incorporating DOI and ENE into the T and N classifications represents a substantial clinical advancement, leading to a more accurate staging of OSCC patients. Both staging systems exhibited statistically significant discrimination between stages; however, the 8th UICC edition allowed for a more precise categorization of patients based on their prognosis and led to enhanced hazard discrimination, particularly within higher stages.

Extra-Capsular Spread of Lymph Node Metastasis in Oral, Oropharyngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancer: A Comparative Subsite Analysis

BACKGROUND

The extra-capsular spread (ECS) of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a hallmark of aggressive primary tumor phenotype in head and neck cancer (HNC); however, the factors influencing ECS are poorly understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study, including 190 cases of oral tongue cancer (OTC), 148 cases of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) (118 HPV-positive and 30 HPV-negative), and 100 cases of hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC). Tumor dimension, tumor biological variables (lymphovascular/perineural invasion and histologic grade), and LNM variables (LNM number and size) were analyzed according to the presence of ECS using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.

RESULTS

LNM variables were significant factors for ECS in all subsites of HNC (p < 0.05), except HPV-positive OPC. In OTC, tumor dimensional variables were significantly related to ECS (p < 0.01). Meanwhile, in OPC and HPC, neither the primary tumor dimension nor the T status were significant factors for ECS occurrence. The predictability of ECS by ROC curve using multiple variables was 0.819 [95% confidence interval: 0.759-0.878] in OTC, 0.687 [0.559-0.815] in HPV-positive OPC, 0.823 [0.642-1.000] in HPV-negative OPC, and 0.907 [0.841-0.973] in HPC.

CONCLUSION

LNM variables were correlated with ECS occurrence for most HNC subsites, and site-dependent primary tumor characteristics might contribute differentially to the ECS development of LNM in HNC.

Development and validation of a novel TNM staging N-classification of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

For oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), extent of extranodal extension (ENE) (minor, ≤2 mm; major, >2 mm) is differentially prognostic, whereas limitations exist with the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer TNM N-classification (TNM-8-N).

METHODS

Resected OSCC patients at four centers were included and extent of ENE was recorded. Thresholds for optimal overall survival (OS) discrimination of lymph node (LN) features were established. After dividing into training and validation sets, two new N-classifications were created using 1) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), and 2) adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and were ranked against TNM-8-N and two published proposals.

RESULTS

A total of 1460 patients were included (pN0: 696; pN+: 764). Of the pN+ cases, 135 (18%) had bilateral/contralateral LNs; 126 (17%) and 244 (32%) had minor and major ENE, and two (0.3%) had LN(s) >6 cm without ENE (N3a). LN number (1 and >1 vs. 0: aHRs, 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44-2.55] and 3.21 [95% CI, 2.44-4.22]), size (>3 vs. ≤3 cm: aHR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.44-2.45]), and ENE extent (major vs. minor: aHR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.05-1.87]) were associated with OS, whereas presence of contralateral LNs was not (aHR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.81-1.36]). The aHR proposal provided optimal performance with these changes to TNM-8-N: 1) stratification of ENE extent, 2) elimination of N2c and 6-cm threshold, and 3) stratification of N2b by 3 cm threshold.

CONCLUSION

A new N-classification improved staging performance compared to TNM-8-N, by stratifying by ENE extent, eliminating the old N2c category and the 6 cm threshold, and by stratifying multiple nodes by size.

Adding Concomitant Chemotherapy to Postoperative Radiotherapy in Oral Cavity Carcinoma with Minor Risk Factors: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

When presenting with major pathological risk factors, adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for oral cavity cancers (OCC) is recommended, but the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (POCRT) when only minor pathological risk factors are present is controversial. A systematic review following the PICO-PRISMA methodology (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42021267498) was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries. Studies assessing outcomes of POCRT in patients with solely minor risk factors (perineural invasion or lymph vascular invasion; pN1 single; DOI ≥ 5 mm; close margin < 2−5 mm; node-positive level IV or V; pT3 or pT4; multiple lymph nodes without ENE) were evaluated. A meta-analysis technique with a single-arm study was performed. Radiotherapy was combined with chemotherapy in all studies. One study only included patients treated with POCRT. In the other 12 studies, patients were treated with only PORT (12,883 patients) and with POCRT (10,663 patients). Among the patients treated with POCRT, the pooled 3 year OS rate was 72.9% (95%CI: 65.5−79.2%); the pooled 3 year DFS was 70.9% (95%CI: 48.8−86.2%); and the pooled LRFS was 69.8% (95%CI: 46.1−86.1%). Results are in favor of POCRT in terms of OS but not significant for DFS and LRFS, probably due to the heterogeneity of the included studies and a combination of different prognostic factors.

Towards an Improved Pathological Node Classification for Prognostic Stratification of Patients With Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Nationwide Registry Study

Background

To assess the prognostic significance of different nodal parameters [i.e., number of pathologically positive nodes, log odds of positive lymph nodes, lymph node ratio (LNR), and extra-nodal extension (ENE)] in Taiwanese patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), and to devise an optimized pN classification system for predicting survival in OCSCC.

Methods

A total of 4287 Taiwanese patients with first primary OCSCC and nodal metastases were enrolled. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with the spline method was applied to identify the optimal cut-off values for LNR, log odds of positive lymph nodes, and number of pathologically positive nodes.

Results

On multivariable analysis, we identified a LNR ≥0.078/0.079, the presence of at least three pathologically positive nodes, and ENE as independent prognosticators for 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates. We therefore devised a four-point prognostic scoring system according to the presence or absence of each variable. The 5-year DSS and OS rates of patients with scores of 0−3 were 70%/62%/50%/36% (p &lt;0.0001) and 61%/52%/40%25%, respectively (p &lt;0.0001). On analyzing the AJCC 2017 pN classification, patients with pN3a displayed better survival rates than those with pN2 disease. The 5-year DSS and OS rates of patients with pN1/pN2/pN3a/pN3b disease were 72%/60%/67%/43% (p &lt;0.0001) and 63%/51%/67%/33%, respectively (p &lt;0.0001).

Conclusions

Three nodal parameters (i.e., a LNR ≥0.078/0.079, the presence of at least three pathologically positive nodes, and ENE) assessed in combination provided a better prognostic stratification than the traditional AJCC pN classification.

Prognostic Value of Pathologically Positive Nodal Number in p16-Negative Oropharyngeal and Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with pN3b Status

In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the number of pathologically positive nodes (pN+) in p16-negative oropharyngeal (OPSCC) and hypopharyngeal (HPSCC) squamous cell carcinoma cases with pN3b status after surgery. We reviewed the clinical and pathological features of 120 newly diagnosed p16-negative OPSCC and HPSCC patients with pN3b status after radical surgery. The primary endpoints were the 5-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and their prognostic factors. We used the Cox proportional hazards model for survival analysis. We generated predictive nomograms that incorporated the clinicopathological factors of OS and CSS. The 5-year OS and CSS rates were 44.1% and 59.1%, respectively. The optimal number of pN+ to predict the 5-year OS and CSS was pN+ = 3. In the Cox model, we observed that pN+ ≥ 3 was a significantly negative predictor of OS (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1–3.2, p = 0.021) and CSS (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2–4.6; p = 0.015). After adding the pN+ variable, the c-index of the predictive nomogram incorporating assorted clinicopathological factors increased from 0.66 to 0.689 for OS and from 0.713 to 0.75 for CSS. The results highlight the prognostic value of the pN+ number in p16-negative OPSCC and HPSCC patients with pN3b status.

Adjuvant therapy may be omitted for oral cavity cancer with only one positive lymph node

OBJECTIVE

Whether to administer adjuvant treatment is a matter of great debate for oral cavity cancer harboring a single positive node without extranodal extension and positive margin (defined as low/intermediate risk pN1new in this study).

METHODS

A total of 243 low/intermediate risk pN1new patients with oral cavity cancer who received curative surgery were included. Overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were compared between patients receiving adjuvant treatment and observation alone.

RESULTS

For patients receiving adjuvant therapy vs observation, the differences in outcomes were not statistically significant in terms of 5-year OS, LRFS, RRFS, and DMFS. For subgroup analysis, in low/intermediate pN1new patients with one or more minor risk factors, adjuvant therapy was not significantly associated with OS, LRFS, RRFS, or DMFS in pN1new patients.

CONCLUSION

For low/intermediate risk pN1new patients with oral cavity cancer, adjuvant therapy might be omitted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Efficacy of Postoperative Unilateral Neck Irradiation in Patients with Buccal Mucosa Squamous Carcinoma with Extranodal Extension: A Propensity Score Analysis

Unilateral radiotherapy (RT) as a postoperative treatment for multiple ipsilateral lymph node (LN) metastases remains controversial. We investigated the efficacy of postoperative unilateral RT for buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC) with extranodal extensions (ENEs). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 186 patients with ENE+ BMSCC who received postoperative RT during 1997-2016. Propensity score matching was used to establish comparable cohorts. The endpoints were contralateral nodal control (CLNC), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), local control (LC), and regional control (RC). After matching, 123 patients were selected for analysis; 45 (36.6%) and 78 (63.4%) patients underwent unilateral and bilateral RT, respectively. The median follow-up was 36.27 months. The survival outcomes in the unilateral and bilateral RT groups were similar: 3-year CLNC (85.6% vs. 89.1%, p = 0.748), OS (53.2% vs. 57.4%, p = 0.229), DFS (46.5% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.515), DMFS (70.7% vs. 72.0%, p = 0.499), LC (78.0% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.692), and RC (79.9% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.465). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, unilateral and bilateral RT showed comparable outcomes; the number of ENEs ≥ 4 was the only significant prognostic factor for all clinical outcomes. Using decision tree analysis, we classified our patients to have a low, intermediate, or high risk of contralateral failure based on three factors: number of ENEs, margin status, and tumor stage. In conclusion, postoperative unilateral RT did not worsen outcomes in patients with ENE+ BMSCC in this cohort. The decision tree model may assist physicians in optimizing and tailoring radiation fields.

Prognostic impact of extranodal extension in resected head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in the era of postoperative chemoradiation: A retrospective monocentric study

BACKGROUND

For patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC), surgery (S) followed by radiotherapy (RT) is a standard of care. Randomized controlled trials have shown that postoperative chemoradiation (CRT) increased the locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) in patient with R1-resection margin and/or extranodal extension (ENE). ENE has been introduced in the 8th TNM staging classification since its presence has been shown to have an independent adverse prognostic impact. The data supporting this finding were however mainly collected in the pre-CRT era.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to challenge the adverse prognostic factor of ENE in the era of CRT.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate patients diagnosed with LAHNSCC and undergoing a treatment by S and postoperative RT or CRT in Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France between 2003 and 2018. Patients with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal SCC were included.

RESULTS

439 patients were included in the study. For patients with non-oropharyngeal p16-positive tumors without ENE, five-year OS, local control, and regional control (RC) reached 63.7%, 86.1%, and 94.9%, respectively; corresponding figures for patients with ENE reached, 42.6%, 77.5%, and 81.1%, respectively (p-value of 0.0006, 0.167, and 0.0005). In multivariable analysis, for non-oropharyngeal p16-positive tumors, ENE remained a poor prognostic factor for OS (RR = 1.74, 95%, CI = 1.16-2.61, p = 0.0069) and RC (RR 3.60, 95% CI =: 1.64-7.87, p = 0.0013).

CONCLUSION

In the era or postoperative chemoradiation, pathological ENE remains an adverse prognostic factor for OS and RC.

Improved prognostic stratification of patients with pN3b oral cavity cancer based on maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic nodes, lymph node ratio, and level of cervical nodal metastases

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of pN3b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) remains heterogeneous. We sought to improve the prognostic stratification of patients with pN3b OCSCC through a combined analysis of FDG-PET parameters and clinicopathological risk factors (RFs).

METHODS

From 2001 to 2019, complete data on maximum standardized uptake values derived from FDG-PET of neck metastatic nodes (SUV-nodal-max) and clinicopathological RFs were available for 257 patients with pN3b disease.

RESULTS

Using the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) as the outcome of interest, the optimal cutoff points for SUV-nodal-max and lymph node ratio (LNR) were 15.9 and 0.17, respectively. The 5-year DFS rates/(number of cases) for patients with pN3b disease were as follows: SUV-nodal-max < 15.9 versus ≥ 15.9, 49%(226)/21%(31), p = 0.000003; LNR < 0.17 versus ≥ 0.17, 49%(230)/17%(27), p = 0.000117; absence versus presence of neck level IV/V metastases, 49%(230)/15%(27), p = 0.000004. Multivariable analyses revealed that SUV-nodal-max ≥ 15.9, LNR ≥ 0.17, and level IV/V metastases were independent prognosticators for 5-year distant metastases (DM), DFS, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) rates. Based on these variables, we devised a scoring system that identified three distinct prognostic subgroups at low (score 0, n = 190), intermediate (score 1, n = 51), and high (scores 2-3, n = 16) risk. The 5-year rates of patients with pN3b disease deemed to be at low/intermediate/high risk were as follows: DM, 31%/52%/89%; DFS, 54%/26%/0%; DSS, 59%/36%/8%; OS, 42%/31%/6%, respectively; all p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

A scoring system based on SUV-nodal-max, LNR, and level IV/V metastases improves the prognostic stratification of OCSCC patients with pN3b disease.

cN+pN0 disease does not portend a less favorable prognosis compared with cN0pN0 in patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Background

We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with cN+pN0 versus cN0pN0 disease.

Methods

A total of 1309 OCSCC patients with pN0 disease were included. Of them, 1019 and 290 cases had cN0pN0 and cN+pN0 disease, respectively. For comparison purposes, we also examined 799 patients with pN+disease (cN0pN+/cN+pN+, n = 239/560). Subgroup analysis was performed in a propensity score‐matched cohort with cN0pN0 and cN+pN0 disease (n = 284 each).

Results

Compared with cN0pN0, patients with cN+pN0 had a higher prevalence of the following variables: betel chewing, pT3−4, depth ≥10 mm, perineural invasion, and treatment with surgery and adjuvant therapy. The prognosis of patients with cN+pN0 (mean: 52 nodes) and cN0pN0 (mean: 39 nodes) disease was similar both in the original cohort and after propensity score matching. However, the 5‐year outcomes were more favorable for cN+pN0/cN0pN0 compared with cN0pN+/cN+pN+ (local control, 88%/88%/83%/81%; neck control, 94%/93%/82%/76%; distant metastases, 4%/3%/13%/31%; disease‐free survival, 84%/83%/68%/52%; disease‐specific survival, 92%/92%/77%/57%; overall survival, 81%/82%/59%/42%; all p values <0.001; cN+pN0 versus cN0pN0, all p values >0.05). cN+pN0 disease (vs. cN0pN0) was not significantly associated with local control, neck control, distant metastases, and survivals either in univariable or multivariable analyses.

Conclusions

Despite a higher risk factor burden, the prognosis of patients with cN+pN0 disease did not differ from that of cases with cN0pN0. The higher nodal yield and the more frequent use of adjuvant therapy in cN+pN0 disease may explain the lack of significant differences in terms of neck control compared with cN0pN0 disease.

Poor tumor differentiation is an independent adverse prognostic variable in patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer--Comparison with pathological risk factors according to the NCCN guidelines

Methods

We sought to compare the prognostic impact of tumor differentiation with respect to adverse risk factors (RFs) identified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines––including extranodal extension (ENE), positive/close margins, perineural invasion, lymphatic invasion, and vascular invasion––in patients with locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

Results

Between 1996 and 2018, 1179 consecutive patients with first primary pT3–4 OCSCC were included. A three‐level grading system was adopted––in which the final classification was assigned according to the most prevalent tumor grade. We identified 382/669/128 patients with well/moderately/poorly differentiated tumors, respectively. Compared with well/moderately differentiated tumors, poorly differentiated OCSCC had a higher prevalence of the following variables: female sex (4%/6%/11%), ENE, (14%/36%/61%), positive margins (0.5%/2%/4%), close margins (10%/14%/22%), perineural invasion (22%/50%/63%), lymphatic invasion (2%/9%/17%), vascular invasion (1%/4%/10%), and adjuvant therapy (64%/80%/87%). The 5‐year rates of patients with well/moderately/poorly differentiated OCSCC were as follows: local control (LC, 85%/82%/84%, p = 0.439), neck control (NC, 91%/83%/70%, p < 0.001), distant metastases (DM, 6%/18%/40%, p < 0.001), disease‐free survival (DFS, 78%/63%/46%, p < 0.001), disease‐specific survival (DSS, 85%/71%/49%, p < 0.001), and overall survival (OS, 68%/55%/39%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the following variables as independent prognosticators for 5‐year outcomes: ENE (LC/NC/DM/DFS/DSS/OS), poorly differentiated tumors (NC/DM/DFS/DSS/OS), positive margins (LC/DFS), lymphatic invasion (DFS/DSS/OS), perineural invasion (DM), and age ≥65 years (OS).

Conclusions

In addition to ENE, poor tumor differentiation was identified as the second most relevant adverse RF for patients with pT3–4 OCSCC. We suggest that the NCCN guidelines should include poor tumor differentiation as an adverse RF to refine and tailor clinical management.

Prognostic stratification of patients with AJCC 2018 pStage IVB oral cavity cancer: Should pT4b and pN3 disease be reclassified?

OBJECTIVES

pStage IVB oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is defined as either pT4b or pN3 disease. We sought to devise an improved prognostic stratification of this patient group.

METHODS

Between December 2003 and January 2018, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 1331 consecutive patients with OCSCC who received tumor excision and neck dissection. The number of patients with pT4a/pT4b, pT1N3b/pT2N3b/pT3N3b/pT4N3b, and pStage IVA/IVB was 370/83, 3/49/42/142, and 332/295, respectively.

RESULTS

The 5-year rates of disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) for patients with pT4a/pT4b disease were 64%/63% (p = 0.973) and 72%/69% (p = 0.672), respectively. The 5-year DFS and DSS rates for patients with pT1N3b/pT2N3b/pT3N3b/pT4N3b disease were 67%/65%/40%/42% (p < 0.001; pT1-2N3b versus pT3-4N3b, p = 0.002) and 100%/68%/45%/49% (p < 0.001; pT1-2N3b versus pT3-4N3b, p = 0.002), respectively. We devised a new definition for pStage IV by considering patients with pT4bN0-2 and pT1-2N3b diseases as pStage-IVA. The number of patients with pStage IVA/IVB (pT3-4N3b) was 443/184. The 5-year rates of AJCC pStage IVA/IVB and the newly proposed pStage IVA/IVB (pT3-4N3b) were as follows: DFS, 74%/52% and 72%/42%; DSS, 83%/58% and 81%/47%; respectively, all p value < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes of pT4b and pT4a OCSCC are similar. However, patients with pT3-4N3b disease have a less favorable 5-year prognosis compared with cases with pT1-2N3b. In light of the unfavorable outcomes, pT3-4N3b disease should continue to be classified as pStage IVB. Conversely, pT4bN0-2 and pT1-2N3b diseases portend a less adverse prognosis and should therefore be downstaged to pStage IVA.

How is neck dissection performed in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery? Results of a representative nationwide survey among university and non-university hospitals in Germany

Introduction

Neck dissection (ND) is a surgical procedure addressing cervical lymph nodes and metastases in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The aim of this study was to analyze clinical decisions regarding indications and variations of ND in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) in Germany.

Material and methods

A nationwide survey of the German Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery was performed using dynamic online questionnaires including 38 questions. Data about oncological centers, case numbers, and staging procedures were collected. Relevant aspects, such as inclusion of level IIb and levels IV and V to ND, uni- vs. bilateral ND, and the influence of extra-nodal extension (ENE) of metastases on extension of ND were evaluated.

Results

Eighty-four OMFS of university and non-university hospitals participated in the study (responding rate 21.4%). Sixty-six (78.57%) stated to work at certified cancer centers and 53.57% of the hospitals treated between 50 and 100 OSCC cases per year. CT and/or MRI of the head and neck was performed in most of the staging procedures. Level IIb was included by 71 (93.42%) of the participants in selective ND. Levels IV and V were included by 53 (69.74%) in node-positive neck. In solitary ipsilateral metastases (ENE−), 49 participants (62.82%) stated to perform exclusively an ipsilateral ND and 40 (51.95%) stated to perform only an ipsilateral ND in ENE+.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated a high rate of certified cancer centers in Germany showing differences regarding staging procedures, indications, and extension of ND, especially in increasingly complex cases.

Clinical relevance

Clinical decisions regarding ND are dependent on case-individual aspects and must be decided individually.

Prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer treated with primary chemoradiation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC) treated with primary chemoradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cancer registry data were reviewed from 2005 to 2014. Inclusion criteria included HPC, clinical N1-3 disease (AJCC staging system, 7th edition), and receiving radiotherapy. Patients with M1 diseaseor with synchronous/metachronous cancer were excluded. Staging images were reviewed by two radiologists. rENE was defined as infiltration of adjacent fat/muscles, irregular nodal surface, or irregular capsular enhancement. Clinical stage, rENE status, and clinical outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 355 patients were included. Patients with rENE had lower 3-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates. Univariate analysis showed that clinical T4 or N3 stage, overall stage IV, and rENE correlated with OS and RFS. In multivariate analysis, clinical T4 or N3 stage correlated with poor OS, while clinical T4 or N3 stage and rENE were independent predictors of poor RFS. N1/2 without rENE was designated as Group 1, N1/2 with rENE as Group 2, and N3 with/without rENE as Group 3. The 3-year RFS rates in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 55.8%, 41.0%, and 29.3%, respectively. The 3-year RFS rate in Group 1 was significantly higher than that in the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

rENE is an adverse prognostic factor for survival in patients with HPC treated with primary chemoradiation. It correlated with inferior RFS regardless of N stage. rENE may be used as a criterion for clinical ENE in future staging systems.

Missed radiation therapy sessions in first three weeks predict distant metastasis and less favorable outcomes in surgically treated patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Background

We sought to investigate the prognostic impact of missed RT sessions in patients who had undergone surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

Methods

The study sample consisted of 905 patients with surgically treated OCSCC who fulfilled criteria of RT course ≤8 weeks. The study participants were divided into three groups based on the characteristics of missed RT, as follows: 1) early missed RT, 2) late missed RT, and 3) RT as scheduled.

Results

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled groups were 53.0, 58.1, and 64.5%, respectively (p = 0.046). In multivariate analysis, early missed RT was independently associated with both OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.486; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.122–1.966; p = 0.006) and the occurrence of distant metastasis (HR = 1.644; 95% CI: 1.047–2.583; p = 0.031).

Conclusion

Early missed RT was independently associated with a higher occurrence of distant metastasis and less favorable OS in patients who had undergone surgery for OCSCC.

Risk stratification in oral squamous cell carcinoma using staging of the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) staging manual has major changes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We searched PubMed, OvidMedline, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies that examined the performance of AJCC8 in OSCC. A total of 40 808 patients were included in the studies of our meta-analysis. A hazard ratio (HR) of 1.87 (95%CI 1.78-1.96) was seen for stage II, 2.65 (95%CI 2.51-2.80) for stage III, 3.46 (95%CI 3.31-3.61) for stage IVa, and 7.09 (95%CI 4.85-10.36) for stage IVb. A similar gradual increase in risk was noted for the N classification. For the T classification, however, there was a less clear variation in risk between T3 and T4. AJCC8 provides a good risk stratification for OSCC. Future research should examine the proposals introduced in the published studies to further improve the performance of AJCC8.

Survival outcomes after surgical treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To identify the clinicopathological parameters that influence survival in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma, in order to allow for the development of individualized surveillance programmes and reduce the delay in diagnosis of recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 553 patients with a treatment-naïve primary oral squamous cell carcinoma, who underwent primarily curative intended surgery. Exclusion criteria were neoadjuvant radio(chemo)therapy, follow-up < 1 year, perioperative death, inoperable disease, synchronous multiple malignancies and inadequate information on clinicopathological parameters.

RESULTS

The clinicopathological factors that influence overall survival, disease-free survival and locoregional control were calculated. In the multivariate survival analysis, the occurrence of recurrence, presence of extracapsular spread, T- and N-classification were shown to be independent risk factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The identification of these risk factors can lead to the development of individualized follow-up programmes based on risk stratification. This allows for the earliest possible diagnosis of relapse which is essential to offer the patient a realistic second treatment chance and to improve survival rates.

Pretreatment body mass index as a prognostic predictor in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

Objectives

To evaluate whether low body mass index (BMI) is a potential adverse prognostic factor in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Material and methods

This cross-sectional study included 320 patients with OSCC who underwent therapeutic surgical treatment in Taiwan. The pretreatment BMI was measured as a common indicator of the pretreatment nutritional status to calculate the overall survival in Kaplan-Meier method. The adverse histopathological features of margin status, depth of invasion (DOI), lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), perineural invasion (PNI), and extranodal extension (ENE) were analyzed using the Cox regression model.

Results

Low BMI (underweight), DOI > 5 mm, and ENE were identified as detrimental prognostic factors. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the low BMI group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.683; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.116–2.539; P = 0.022), DOI > 5 mm (OR = 2.399; 95% CI 1.459–3.943; P = 0.001), and ENE (OR = 2.467; 95% CI 1.540–3.951; P = 0.000) yielded reduced survival rate.

Conclusions

The lower BMI had an important and significant effect on the survival of patients with oral cancer and their surgical outcomes. In addition to the adverse histopathological features, a DOI > 5 mm and positive ENE were also identified as the most important prognostic factors.

Clinical relevance

Underweight patients with low BMI, DOI of > 5 mm, and positive ENE should receive more intensive nutritional supplementation and postoperative adjuvant therapy.

A combined analysis of maximum standardized uptake value on FDG-PET, genetic markers, and clinicopathological risk factors in the prognostic stratification of patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Clinical outcomes of patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) chiefly depend on the presence of specific clinicopathological risk factors (RFs). Here, we performed a combined analysis of FDG-PET, genetic markers, and clinicopathological RFs in an effort to improve prognostic stratification.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 2036 consecutive patients with first primary OCSCC who underwent surgery between 1996 and 2016. Of them, 345 underwent ultra-deep targeted sequencing (UDTS, between 1996 and 2011) and 168 whole exome sequencing (WES, between 2007 and 2016). Preoperative FDG-PET imaging was performed in 1135 patients from 2001 to 2016. Complete data on FDG-PET, genetic markers, and clinicopathological RFs were available for 327 patients.

RESULTS

Using log-ranked tests based on 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), the optimal cutoff points for maximum standardized uptake values (SUV-max) of the primary tumor and neck metastatic nodes were 22.8 and 9.7, respectively. The 5-year DFS rates were as follows: SUVtumor-max ≥ 22.8 or SUVnodal-max ≥ 9.7 (n = 77) versus SUVtumor-max < 22.8 and SUVnodal-max < 9.7 (n = 250), 32%/62%, P < 0.001; positive UDTS or WES gene panel (n = 64) versus negative (n = 263), 25%/62%, P < 0.001; pN3b (n = 165) versus pN1-2 (n = 162), 42%/68%, P < 0.001. On multivariate analyses, SUVtumor-max ≥ 22.8 or SUVnodal-max ≥ 9.7, a positive UDTS/WES gene panel, and pN3b disease were identified as independent prognosticators for 5-year outcomes. Based on these variables, we devised a scoring system that identified four distinct prognostic groups. The 5-year rates for patients with a score from 0 to 3 were as follows: loco-regional control, 80%/67%/47%/24% (P < 0.001); distant metastases, 13%/23%/55%/92% (P < 0.001); DFS, 74%/58%/28%/7% (P < 0.001); and disease-specific survival, 80%/64%/35%/7% (P < 0.001) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined assessment of tumor and nodal SUV-max, genetic markers, and pathological node status may refine the prognostic stratification of OCSCC patients.

A histopathological evaluation and potential prognostic implications of oral squamous cell carcinoma with adverse features

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the adverse clinicopathologic features of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), including margin status, depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and extranodal extension that significantly affect survival outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included 341 patients with OSCC who underwent therapeutic surgical treatment in Taiwan. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival outcomes. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to evaluate the associations of various clinicopathologic features with 5-year overall survival (OS) outcomes in patients with pN0 and pN+ tumors.

RESULTS

Overall, the patients had 5-year OS and progression-free survival rates of 60.0 and 47.9%, respectively. In the pN0 group, the multivariate analysis identified a positive margin (odds ratio [OR] = 16.3, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 3.7-72.3; P = 0.001), depth of invasion >5 mm (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2-3.7; P = 0.012), presence of lymphovascular space invasion (OR = 5.4, 95% CI: 1.3-22.0; P = 0.018), and presence of perineural invasion (OR = 4.3, 95% CI: 1.7-11.1; P = 0.002) as independent and significant prognosticators of OS. In the pN+ group, only the presence of extranodal extension independently predicted OS (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.7; P = 0.0026).

CONCLUSIONS

When determining survival prognosis for patients with a pN0 status, we recommended including all adverse features. In contrast, extranodal extension was the most important prognostic factor for patients with a pN+ status.

Time to recurrence and patient survival in recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Tumour relapse remains one of the major problems in managing oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with mortality rates of up to 92%. Early recurrences have a worse prognosis than late relapses. However, few has been written about the influence of clinicopathological parameters on the timing of recurrence and the patient survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 159 patients with an OSCC recurrent disease. Exclusion criteria were neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, follow-up <6 weeks, perioperative death, second primaries and inadequate information on clinicopathological parameters. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A significant correlation was found in the χ2-analysis between the timing of recurrence and the margin status (p = 0.020), lymph node ratio (p = 0.030) and grading (p = 0.003) of the primary tumour. In the multivariate survival analysis, the timing of recurrence (p < 0.001), margin status of the primary tumour (p = 0.023), presence of extracapsular spread in the primary tumour (p = 0.003) and performance of a salvage treatment (p < 0.001) were shown to be independent risk factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

For patients with a recurrent OSCC, the time to recurrence, margin status, extracapsular spread and the performance of a salvage treatment are independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Furthermore, a significant association exists between the moment of recurrence and the lymph node ratio, the margin status and grading of the primary tumour. This knowledge can allow for the development of individualised surveillance programs and like this, an earlier diagnosis and better second treatment chance in the case of a recurrence.