A single gestational weight gain recommendation is possible for all classes of pregnant women with obesity

Is postpartum depression related to total weight gain during pregnancy and maternal anemia?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of weight gain and maternal anemia on postpartum depression.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single-center, case-control study. We recorded the demographic characteristics, blood ferritin level, and weight gain during the pregnancy. This study was planned between April 2023 and June 2023 in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic of Ankara Etlik City Hospital. A total of 109 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were assessed with the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. Weight gain, nutritional education, educational level, mode of delivery, and pregnancy history were asked in person. Ferritin levels at the onset of labor were determined to detect anemia. Twin births, births due to fetal anomalies or intrauterine stillbirths, patients with systemic infections, and patients diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder in the past 6 months whose records were not accessible were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Pregnancy weight gain and percentage of pregnancy weight gain were higher. Serum ferritin levels and nutritional education during pregnancy were lower in the postpartum depression group (p<0.001). These parameters with statistical significance were identified as risk factors in the regression analysis for postpartum depression (p<0.05). In receiver operating characteristics analysis, >15 kg for weight gain, >28.8 for percentage of weight gain in pregnancy, and <19 ng/dL for serum ferritin level were identified as cutoff values (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Nutritional education and vitamin supplementation should be recommended to pregnant women during routine examinations.

Low gestational weight gain (+2.0 to 4.9 kg) for singleton-term gestations associated with favorable perinatal outcomes for all prepregnancy obesity classes

BACKGROUND

Previous studies that evaluated low gestational weight gain or weight loss among prepregnancy obesity classes have not determined the amount of gestational weight gain associated with the lowest risk of adverse perinatal outcomes and neonatal morbidity among singleton term births.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of specific gestational weight gain categories of weight loss, stable weight, and low gain considered below the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines to perinatal outcomes and neonatal morbidity for singleton, term live births among prepregnancy obesity classes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of 18,476 women among 3 classes of prepregnancy obesity, based on measured prepregnancy weight, and delivering a live singleton pregnancy at ≥37 weeks of gestation at a Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospital (2009-2012). Variables from electronic medical records included perinatal outcomes, sociodemographics, and measured prepregnancy and delivery weights to calculate total gestational weight gain, used to define 5 gestational weight gain categories: weight loss (<-2.0 kg), stable weight (-2.0 to +1.9 kg), low gain (+2.0 to 4.9 kg), gain within guidelines (+5.0 to 9.1 kg; referent), and gain above guidelines (>9.1 kg). Logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of maternal and newborn perinatal outcomes (hypertensive disorders, cesarean delivery, size for gestational age, length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit admission) associated with gestational weight gain categories stratified by prepregnancy obesity classes 1, 2, and 3.

RESULTS

Low gain occurred in 8%, 12%, and 13% of women in obesity class 1 (body mass index, 30.0-34.9), class 2 (body mass index, 35.0-39.9), and class 3 (body mass index, ≥40), respectively. Compared with gestational weight gain within Institute of Medicine guidelines, low gain was associated with similar or improved maternal and newborn perinatal outcomes for all obesity classes without increased odds of neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal length of stay ≥3 days, or small for gestational age. The percentages of small for gestational age for the low gain category were 4.4%, 3.0%, and 4.3% among prepregnancy obesity classes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and comparable with the gestational weight gain within the guideline category (P>.05). The adjusted odds ratios of small-for-gestational age were not statistically significant for all obesity classes; class 1 (1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.71) , class 2 (1.05; 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.93), and class 3 (2.03; 95% confidence interval 0.97-4.27).

CONCLUSION

Lower gestational weight gain of +2.0 to 4.9 kg showed the most favorable perinatal outcomes, without higher small for gestational age or neonatal morbidity for all obesity classes.

Gestational Weight Gain and Small for Gestational Age in Obese Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the relationship between gestational weight gain and the risk of small for gestational age in obese pregnant women.

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching the Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed databases up to June 30th, 2022. The meta-analysis was carried out to determine the risk of small for gestational age with gestational weight gain (GWG) below the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines compared with within the guidelines in obese women. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the methodological quality. The chi-squared test, Q test, and I² test were used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted, and publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger's test. Sensitivity analyses were performed for three groups of obese people (I: BMI 30-34.9 kg/m², II: BMI 35-39.9 kg/m², and III: BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) to examine the association of obesity and SGA.

RESULTS

A total of 788 references were screened, and 29 studies (n = 1242420 obese women) were included in the systematic review. Obese women who gained weight below the IOM guideline had a higher risk of SGA than those who gained weight within the guideline (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.16-1.38, Z = 5.36). Both weight loss (<0 kg) and inadequate weight (0-4.9 kg) during pregnancy in obese women are associated with an increased risk of SGA (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.37-1.64, Z = 8.82) (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.14-1.23, Z = 8.06). The same conclusions were also confirmed for the three obesity classes (I: OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.29-1.47; II: OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.30-1.49; and III: OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.16-1.37). Subgroup analysis by country showed that GWG below guidelines in obese women of the USA and Europe was associated with risk for SGA (USA (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.15-1.46), Europe (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11-1.40)) and not in Asia (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.91-1.50).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that obese pregnant women who had weight loss or inadequate weight (0-4.9 kg) according to the IOM guideline had increased risks for SGA. Moreover, we also evaluated that gestational weight loss (<0 kg) in these pregnancies was associated with an increased risk for SGA compared with inadequate weight (0-4.9 kg) in these pregnancies. Therefore, the clinical focus should assist obese women to achieve GWG within the IOM guidelines to decrease the risk for SGA.

Gestational weight gain and mode of delivery by the class of obesity: A meta-analysis

The association between gestational weight gain (GWG) and mode of delivery in females with different obesity classes is not clear. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between GWG, categorized according to the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines, and the risk of cesarean section (CS) or operative vaginal delivery (OVD) in females with different obesity classes. Eight studies were identified. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of CS for females with GWG above the recommendations were 1.27 (1.20-1.33) for obesity class I, 1.22 (1.20-1.23) for class II, and 1.17 (1.15-1.19) for class III. Also, the pooled ORs (95% CI) of OVD were 1.21 (1.005-1.46) for obesity class I, 1.12 (1.04-1.21) for class II, and 1.10 (1.001-1.22) for obesity class III. GWG below the recommendations was associated with lower risk of CS for females with obesity class I (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.92), class II (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.90), and class III (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93). Pregnant participants gaining weight above the 2009 IOM guidelines were at higher risk for CS and OVD regardless of obesity classes. Gaining weight below the guidelines was associated with a lower risk of CS among females in any obesity class.

Gestational Weight Gain Below Instead of Within The Guidelines per Class of Maternal Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To systematically investigate a wide range of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes with respect to gestational weight gain (GWG) below the current IOM and ACOG guidelines compared to within the guidelines and to stratify outcomes by the class of obesity and by the type of study analysis.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched studies on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 2009 to April 30, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies with respect to GWG below the current IOM and ACOG guidelines compared to within the guidelines, investigated in obesity overall (BMI> 30 kg/m²), and/or class of obesity (I: BMI 30-34.9 kg/m², II: BMI 35-39.9 kg/ m² and III: BMI> 40 kg/m²).

METHODS

Among the studies that met criteria, multiple obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were tabulated and compared between pregnancies with weight gain below the guidelines and those with weight gain within the guidelines, further classified by the class of obesity if applicable. Primary outcomes included small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), preeclampsia (PE), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Secondary outcomes included cesarean section (CS), preterm birth (PTB), postpartum weight retention, and composite neonatal morbidity. Meta-analysis of univariate and adjusted multivariate analysis studies were conducted. The random-effect model was used to pool the mean differences or odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² value. Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess individual study quality.

RESULTS

Total of 54 studies reporting on 30,245,946 pregnancies were included, of which 11,515,411 pregnancies were in the univariate analysis and 18,730,535 pregnancies in the adjusted multivariate analysis. In the meta-analysis of univariate studies, compared to women who gained within the guidelines, those who gained below the guidelines had higher odds for SGA in obesity class I and II (OR:1.30 (95% CI 1.17, 1.45), I² 0%, P<0.00001, and OR: 1.56 (95% CI 1.31, 1.85), I² 0%, P<0.00001), respectively), however, the incidence of SGA was below the expected limits (<10%) and was not associated with increased neonatal morbidity. Furthermore, after adjusting for covariates, that difference was no statistically significant anymore. The difference was not statistically significant for class III obesity. Following adjusted multivariate analysis, no significant differences in SGA rates were noted for all classes of obesity between groups. Significantly lower odds for LGA were seen in GWG below guidelines in obesity class I, II, and III (OR: 0.69 (95% CI 0.64, 0.73), I² 0%, P<0.00001, OR: 0.68 (95% CI 0.63, 0.74), I² 0%, P<0.00001, and OR: 0.65 (95% CI 0.57, 0.75), I² 34%, P<0.00001, respectively), and similar findings were seen in the adjusted multivariate analysis. Women with weight gain below guidelines had significantly lower odds for PE in obesity class I, II, and III (OR: 0.71 (95% CI 0.63, 0.79),), I² 0%, P<0.00001, OR: 0.82 (95% CI 0.73, 0.91), I² 0%, P<0.00001, and OR: 0.82 (95% CI 0.70, 0.94), I² 0%, P=0.006, respectively), and similar findings were seen in the adjusted multivariate analysis. No significant differences were seen in GDM between groups. Regarding PTB, available univariate analysis studies only reported on overall obesity and mixed iatrogenic and spontaneous PTB showing significant increase in the odds of PTB (OR: 1.42 (95% CI 1.40, 1.43), I² 0%, P<0.00001) in women with low weight gain, while adjusted multivariate studies in overall obesity and in all three classes and showed no significant differences of PTB between groups. Women with low weight gain had significantly lower odds for CS in obesity class I, II, and III (OR: 0.76 (95% CI 0.72, 0.81), I² 0%, P<0.00001, OR: 0.82 (95% CI 0.77, 0.87), I² 0%, P<0.00001, and OR: 0.87 (95% CI 0.82, 0.91), I² 0%, P<0.00001, respectively), and similar findings were seen in the adjusted multivariate analysis. There was significantly lower odds for postpartum weight retention (OR: 0.20 (95% CI 0.05, 0.82)), I² 0%, P=0.03) and lower odds for composite neonatal morbidity in the overall obesity group with low GWG (OR: 0.93 (95% CI 0.87, 0.99)), I² 19.6%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to previous reports, the current systematic review and meta-analysis showed no significant increase in SGA rates in pregnancies with weight gain below the current guidelines for all classes of maternal obesity. Furthermore, gaining below the guidelines was associated with lower LGA, PE, and CS rates. Our study provides the evidence that the current recommended GWG is high for all classes of obesity. These results provide pertinent information supporting the notion to revisit the current GWG recommendations for women with obesity and furthermore to classify them by the class of obesity rather than one overall obesity category as is done in the current recommendations.

Weight gain during pregnancy: A narrative review on the recent evidences

Gestational weight gain is necessary for the normal fetus development, in fact a series of studies have evidenced that both low and excessive gestational weight gain is associated with negative fetal-neonatal outcomes. So, evidences on the optimal gestational weight gain across the ranges of the pre-pregnancy maternal body mass index are necessary. In this context, while for normal weight and underweight the recommendations of IOM are clearly stated and supported by well designed and conducted clinical studies, those for the obese pregnant women are even today debated. Pre-pregnancy obesity is associated with high risk to develop hypertension, gestational diabetes, cesarean section and high birth weight. The Institute of Medicine guidelines, in 2009, recommended that women with obesity gain 11-20 lb at a rate of 0.5 lb/week during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Successively, taking into account a series of meta-analysis, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists emphasized that the IOM weight gain targets for obese pregnant women are too high. However the high risk to have babies small for gestational age, related to a low weight gain or a losing of weight during pregnancy, has also been demonstrated. More recent studies have taken into consideration the maternal and fetal outcomes of obese pregnant women with different obesity class (I,II,III) and different weight gain during pregnancy. The analysis of these studies, discussed in this narrative review, show that the appropriate gestational weight gain should be personalized considering the three obesity class; furthermore both an upper and lower limit of gestational weight gain should be reconsidered in order to prevent the negative maternal and fetal outcomes in these women.

Prevalence of and risk factors for excess weight gain in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study using survey data

BACKGROUND

Maternal weight gain during pregnancy is required for fetal development; however, excess gestational weight gain is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. We aimed to determine the proportion of Canadian women who gained excess weight during pregnancy and to identify risk factors for excess gestational weight gain.

METHODS

Self-reported data on maternal weight gain were collected from the 2015/16 and 2017/18 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), a cross-sectional population-based survey. We included females aged 15 to 54 years with data on height, prepregnancy weight and gestational weight gain. We defined excess gestational weight gain in terms of preconception body mass index (BMI) according to the 2009 guideline of the US Institute of Medicine. We used logistic regression to evaluate potential risk factors for excess gestational weight gain.

RESULTS

Of 1 335 615 Canadian women (weighted from approximately 9300 survey respondents), 422 043 (32%) gained excess weight during pregnancy. Women with obesity had 33% lower odds of gaining excess weight relative to women with overweight (odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.94). Risk factors for excess gestational weight gain were lower education level, white or Indigenous identity, smoking, mood disorder, anxiety disorder and Canadian citizenship.

INTERPRETATION

One-third of Canadian women in this survey had excess gestational weight gain during pregnancy, and women with obesity had lower odds of gaining excess weight during pregnancy relative to women with overweight. Strategies are needed to reduce the proportion of Canadian women who gain excess weight during pregnancy, regardless of preconception BMI.

Maternal and Perinatal Outcome of Maternal Obesity at RSCM in 2014-2019

Obesity is a pandemic found in many countries. It is estimated that, in 2025, more than 21% of women in the world will suffer from obesity and its number keeps increasing yearly. Obesity in pregnancy is one of the important challenges in obstetric services given the prevalence and potential adverse effects on the mother and fetus. Obese women have a higher risk of developing gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, venous thromboembolism, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean delivery, and maternal death. The aim of this research is to determine the prevalence of maternal and perinatal complication in various obesity grades. This research was an observational descriptive study using the cross-sectional design. The inclusion criterion is obese pregnant women whose delivery was done in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital (RSCM) from 2014 to 2019. The exclusion criterion in this study is the incomplete medical record. A total of 111 subjects were included in the study. Obesity grades in this study were based on World Health Organization (WHO) obesity, divided into 3 classifications which are obese I (30–34.9 kg/m²), obese II (35–39.9 kg/m²), and obese III (≥40 kg/m²). Maternal outcomes in this study were birth method, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and premature rupture of membrane (PROM). Perinatal outcomes in this study were preterm birth, birth weight, APGAR score, and postdelivery neonatal care. In this study, obese patients had a mean age of 31.23 years, mean gravida 2, parity 1, and abortion 0. Most of these patients used an intrauterine device (IUD) for family planning (74.8%). There were no differences in age, parity status, and family planning methods in each group of patients with different body mass index (p > 0.05). Maternal characteristics are the majority of deliveries performed cesarean delivery (86.5%), cases of diabetes mellitus are more common in obese I patients (50%), preeclampsia is more prevalent in obese grade II patients (34,4%), and premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is more common in patients with obese II (52,4%). However, there was no difference in the prevalence of maternal outcomes between groups. There was a median gestational age of 37 weeks in all obesity grades, the highest percentage of preterm births owned by obese II patients (32,6%), the mean birth weight of babies tends to increase along with the weighting of the body mass index group, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) treatment rooms were mostly occupied from mother with obese II groups (18%). There was no difference in the first-minute and fifth-minute APGAR scores between study groups (p > 0.05). There were no differences in perinatal outcomes between groups. There were no significant differences in maternal and perinatal outcomes prevalence between different obesity grades. However, the rate of maternal and perinatal complications in obese women is higher than the normal population, thus requiring sophisticated prevention and approach toward handling the pregnancy.

A Pragmatic Approach to the Treatment of Women With Type 2 Diabetes in Pregnancy

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing problem among reproductive-aged women. Contemporary trends in obesity and delayed child-bearing are expected to result in an increasing number of pregnancies affected by type 2 DM. Women with known type 2 DM can greatly benefit from preconception care as improved periconception glycemic control and weight loss can decrease the neonatal and maternal risks associated with type 2 DM and pregnancy. Antenatal mainstays of management include frequent blood glucose monitoring, insulin therapy, optimization of coexisting medical conditions, and fetal surveillance. Careful attention to postpartum glucose control, infant feeding choices, and contraceptive counseling are important aspects of immediate postpartum care.