Long-Term Mortality in Diabetic Patients with Tractional Retinal Detachments

Vitrectomy and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Elderly Patients With Vitreoretinal Diseases: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Purpose

To determine the all-cause and cause-specific mortality in elderly patients with vitreoretinal diseases based on vitrectomy status.

Methods

Elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) diagnosed with vitreoretinal diseases between 2003 and 2012 using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Senior cohort (2002–2015) were included in this nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. The exposure of interest was vitrectomy, and information on mortality from patient inclusion until December 2015 was obtained. Cox regression modeling was used to assess the association between vitrectomy and mortality. An additional subgroup analysis was performed to investigate the effects of the underlying retinal disease characteristics and comorbidities on mortality.

Results

The study cohort included 152,283 patients (3,313 and 148,970 in the vitrectomy and non-vitrectomy groups, respectively). The adjusted model showed vitrectomy was associated with a decreased risk of pulmonary-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 0.51; P < 0.001]; however, no association was observed for all-cause mortality (HR, 0.93; P = 0.325). Vitrectomy was associated with increased mortality risk (all-cause: HR, 1.26; P < 0.001 and vascular causes: HR, 1.41; P = 0.003) among patients with retinal vascular diseases and decreased mortality risk (all-cause: HR, 0.64; P < 0.001 and pulmonary causes: HR, 0.35; P = 0.011) among patients with macular diseases. There were significant interactions between age and vitrectomy with respect to all-cause mortality among patients with either vitreoretinal disease.

Conclusions

In elderly patients with retinal diseases, the vitrectomy group showed the lower mortality from pulmonary causes with no association for all-cause mortality.

Follow-Up Appointment Delay in Diabetic Macular Edema Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a novel measure of compliance, follow-up appointment delay, and assess its relationship with clinical and sociodemographic factors in patients undergoing treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a comparative case series of patients treated for DME. The novel measure of compliance - the time in days from the intended day of return and actual day of return, or follow-up appointment delay - was studied and compared to a traditional measure: the percentage of visits missed. These were correlated with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics: best-corrected visual acuity, hemoglobin A1C percent (HbA1c), median household income, smoking status, type of insurance held, marital status, gender, and age. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-five patients (212 eyes) were included in the study. The median times between recommended and actual appointments was 5.0 days (range: 2.0-14.0 days). The mean percentage of visits missed was 31.7% (± 13.3%). The two measures of compliance were positively associated, but the correlation was moderate (r = 0.44). Non-white race, lack of bilateral injections, and higher baseline HBA1c were significant predictors of a median time greater than 7 days between the intended and actual follow-up dates.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study identified a novel method of measuring compliance of DME patients seen by retina specialists and has identified non-white race, lack for bilateral treatment, and poorer glycemic control as risk factors for noncompliance. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:200-206.].

Diabetic retinopathy predicts cardiovascular mortality in diabetes: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of diabetic retinopathy (DR) for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remained unclear. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to assess whether DR predicted CVD mortality in diabetic patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for cohort studies reporting the association of DR and CVD mortality. Then we pooled the data for analysis.

RESULTS

After screening the literature, 10 eligible studies with 11,239 diabetic subjects were finally included in quantitative synthesis. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of DR, mild DR, and severe DR for CVD mortality was 1.83 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42, 2.36; p < 0.001), 1.13 (95% CI 0.81, 1.59; p = 0.46), and 2.26 (1.31, 3.91; p = 0.003), respectively, compared to those without DR. In type 2 DM, the patients with DR had a significantly higher CVD mortality (RR: 1.69; 95% CI 1.27, 2.24; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis also showed a significantly higher CVD mortality in DR according to various regions, study design, data source, and follow-up period (all RR > 1; all P values < 0.05). Data from 2 studies showed no significant correlation of DR and CVD mortality in diabetic patients receiving cardiovascular surgery (RR: 2.40; 95% CI 0.63, 9.18; P = 0.200).

CONCLUSIONS

DR is a risk marker of cardiovascular death, and severe DR predicts a doubled mortality of CVD in diabetes. These findings indicate the importance of early identification and management of diabetic patients with DR to reduce the risk of death.

Surgical management of diabetic tractional retinal detachments

Tractional retinal detachment is an end-stage form of diabetic retinopathy that occurs when contractile forces in the vitreous and neovascular tissue lead to the detachment of the neurosensory retina. We review the literature related to the management of this disease. Preoperative planning includes appropriate patient selection, diagnostic and prognostic imaging, and medical optimization with reduction of systemic risk factors. Use of antivascular endothelial growth factor for preoperative treatment has had significant benefits for tractional retinal detachment repair in improving surgical efficiency and outcomes. Advances in microsurgical instrumentation are discussed, with attention to small-gauge vitrectomy with improved flow dynamics, viewing strategies, and lighting allowing bimanual surgery. Special emphasis is placed on bimanual surgical technique, choice of tamponade, and the avoidance of iatrogenic damage. Complications and special considerations are further explored. Based on our compilation of relevant literature, we propose a surgical algorithm for the management of these complex patients.