1
|
Curry SD, Kocharyan A, Lekovic GP. Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Skull Base Paragangliomas. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1533. [PMID: 38002493 PMCID: PMC10669609 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13111533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of skull base paragangliomas has moved towards the use of cranial nerve preservation strategies, using radiation therapy and subtotal resection in instances when aiming for gross total resection would be expected to cause increased morbidity compared to the natural history of the tumor itself. The goal of this study was to analyze the role of surgery in patients with skull base paragangliomas treated with CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for definitive tumor control. A retrospective review identified 22 patients (median age 65.5 years, 50% female) treated with SRS from 2010-2022. Fourteen patients (63.6%) underwent microsurgical resection. Gross total resection was performed in four patients for tympanic paraganglioma (n = 2), contralateral paraganglioma (n = 1), and intracranial tumor with multiple cranial neuropathies (n = 1). Partial/subtotal resection was performed for the treatment of pulsatile tinnitus and conductive hearing loss (n = 6), chronic otitis and otorrhea (n = 2), intracranial extension (n = 1), or episodic vertigo due to perilymphatic fistula (n = 1). Eighteen patients had clinical and imaging follow-up for a mean (SD) of 4.5 (3.4) years after SRS, with all patients having clinical and radiological tumor control and no mortalities. Surgery remains an important component in the multidisciplinary treatment of skull base paraganglioma when considering other outcomes besides local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven D. Curry
- House Clinic, Los Angeles, CA 90017, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Armine Kocharyan
- House Clinic, Los Angeles, CA 90017, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Gregory P. Lekovic
- House Clinic, Los Angeles, CA 90017, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ong V, Bourcier AJ, Florence T, Mozaffari K, Mekonnen M, Sheppard JP, Duong C, Ding K, Yang I. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Glomus Jugulare Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2022; 162:e49-e57. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
3
|
Manzoor NF, Yancey KL, Aulino JM, Sherry AD, Khattab MH, Cmelak A, Morrel WG, Haynes DS, Bennett ML, O'Malley MR, Netterville J, Wanna G, Rivas A. Contemporary Management of Jugular Paragangliomas With Neural Preservation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 164:391-398. [PMID: 32660391 DOI: 10.1177/0194599820938660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Management of jugular paragangliomas (PGL) has evolved toward subtotal resection (STR). The purpose of this study is to analyze neural preservation and adjuvant treatment for long-term local control. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTINGS Tertiary neurotology practice. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Adults undergoing surgical treatment of jugular PGL between 2006 and 2019. Patients, disease, and treatment variables were collected retrospectively. Single predictor logistic regression was used to ascertain predictors of regrowth or need for salvage radiation. RESULTS A total of 41 patients (median age, 47 years; 76% female) were identified. Most patients presented with advanced-stage disease (Glasscock-Jackson stage III-IV = 76%). Subtotal resection (STR) was performed in 32 (78%) patients. Extended STR (type 1) was the most commonly performed conservative procedure (n = 19, 59%). Postoperative new low cranial neuropathy (LCN) involving CN X and XII was rare (n = 3 and n = 1, respectively). Seventeen patients (41%) underwent postsurgical therapy for tumor regrowth or recurrence, including 15 patients who underwent adjuvant (n = 4) or salvage (n = 11) radiation. Overall tumor control of 94.7% was achieved at a mean follow-up of 35 months. All patients treated with combined modality treatment had local control at last follow-up. Logistic regression identified no single predictor for postsurgical radiation treatment or salvage-free survival. CONCLUSION Management of jugular PGL with a conservative approach is safe and effective with a low rate of new LCN deficit. Active surveillance of residual tumor with salvage radiation for growth results in excellent long-term tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nauman F Manzoor
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kristen L Yancey
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Joseph M Aulino
- Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Alexander D Sherry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mohamed H Khattab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Anthony Cmelak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - William G Morrel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David S Haynes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Marc L Bennett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew R O'Malley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James Netterville
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - George Wanna
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alejandro Rivas
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fatima N, Pollom E, Soltys S, Chang SD, Meola A. Stereotactic radiosurgery for head and neck paragangliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 44:741-752. [PMID: 32318920 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01292-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs) are rare, usually benign hyper vascularized neuroendocrine tumors that traditionally have been treated by surgery, with or without endovascular embolization, or, more recently stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The aim of our study is to determine the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of SRS for treatment of HNPs. A systematic search of electronic databases was performed, and 37 articles reporting 11,174 patients (1144 tumors) with glomus jugulare (GJT: 993, 86.9%), glomus tympanicum (GTT: 94, 8.2%), carotid body tumors (CBTs: 28, 2.4%), and glomus vagale (GVT: 16, 1.4%) treated with SRS definitively or adjuvantly were included. The local control (LC) was estimated from the pooled analysis of the series, and its association with SRS technique as well as demographic and clinical factors was analyzed. The median age was 56 years (44-69 years). With a median clinical and radiological follow-up of 44 months (9-161 months), LC was 94.2%. Majority of the patients (61.0%) underwent Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKS), but there was no statistically significant difference in LC depending upon the SRS technique (p = 0.9). Spearmen's correlation showed that LC was strongly and negatively correlated with multiple parameters, which included female gender (r = - 0.4, p = 0.001), right-sided tumor (r = - 0.3, p = 0.03), primary SRS (r = - 0.5, p ≤ 0.001), and initial clinical presentation of hearing loss (r = - 0.4, p = 0.001). To achieve a LC ≥ 90%, a median marginal dose (Gy) of 15 (range, 12-30 Gy) was required. The results corroborate that SRS in HNPs is associated with good clinical and radiological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nida Fatima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Bldg, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Erqi Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Scott Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Bldg, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Meola
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Bldg, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lior U, Rotem H, Uzi N, Roberto S. LINAC radiosurgery for glomus jugulare tumors: retrospective - cohort study of 23 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162:839-844. [PMID: 32048040 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04251-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glomus jugulare tumors (GJTs) are uncommon and locally disruptive tumors that usually arise within the jugular foramen of the temporal bone. Surgery was the treatment of choice up until recently. In the last decades, however, radiosurgery has surfaced as a promising alternative treatment by providing excellent tumor control with low risk of cranial nerve injuries. Our aim was to examine the results of radiosurgery specifically, linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery (LINAC SRS) for GJT treatment. We hypothesized that radiosurgery will reduce the size of the tumor and improve neurological symptoms. DESIGN AND METHOD Between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2013, 30 patients with GJTs were treated in Sheba Medical Center using LINAC SRS treatment. Comprehensive clinical follow-up was available for 23 patients. Sixteen patients were female and seven males with a median age of 64 years, with a range of 18-87 years. In 19 of the patients, LINAC SRS was the primary treatment, whereas in the remaining four cases, surgery or embolization preceded radiosurgery. The median treated dose to tumor margin was 14 Gy (range 12-27 Gy), and the median tumor volume before treatment was 5 ml (range 0.5-15 ml). RESULTS Following the LINAC SRS treatment, 14 of 23 patients (60%) showed improvement of previous neurological deficits, nine patients (40%) remained unchanged. At the end of a follow-up, tumor reduction was seen in 13 patients and a stable volume in eight (91% tumor control rate). Two cases of tumor progression were noted. Three patients (13%) had post- SRS complications during the follow-up, two of which achieved tumor control, while in one the tumor advanced. CONCLUSIONS LINAC SRS is a practical treatment option for GJTs, with a high rate of tumor control and satisfactory neurological improvement.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zanoletti E, Mazzoni A, Martini A, Abbritti RV, Albertini R, Alexandre E, Baro V, Bartolini S, Bernardeschi D, Bivona R, Bonali M, Borghesi I, Borsetto D, Bovo R, Breun M, Calbucci F, Carlson ML, Caruso A, Cayé-Thomasen P, Cazzador D, Champagne PO, Colangeli R, Conte G, D'Avella D, Danesi G, Deantonio L, Denaro L, Di Berardino F, Draghi R, Ebner FH, Favaretto N, Ferri G, Fioravanti A, Froelich S, Giannuzzi A, Girasoli L, Grossardt BR, Guidi M, Hagen R, Hanakita S, Hardy DG, Iglesias VC, Jefferies S, Jia H, Kalamarides M, Kanaan IN, Krengli M, Landi A, Lauda L, Lepera D, Lieber S, Lloyd SLK, Lovato A, Maccarrone F, Macfarlane R, Magnan J, Magnoni L, Marchioni D, Marinelli JP, Marioni G, Mastronardi V, Matthies C, Moffat DA, Munari S, Nardone M, Pareschi R, Pavone C, Piccirillo E, Piras G, Presutti L, Restivo G, Reznitsky M, Roca E, Russo A, Sanna M, Sartori L, Scheich M, Shehata-Dieler W, Soloperto D, Sorrentino F, Sterkers O, Taibah A, Tatagiba M, Tealdo G, Vlad D, Wu H, Zanetti D. Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA : ORGANO UFFICIALE DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI OTORINOLARINGOLOGIA E CHIRURGIA CERVICO-FACCIALE 2019; 39:S1-S146. [PMID: 31130732 PMCID: PMC6540636 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-suppl.1-39-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Disregarding the widely used division of skull base into anterior and lateral, since the skull base should be conceived as a single anatomic structure, it was to our convenience to group all those approaches that run from the antero-lateral, pure lateral and postero-lateral side of the skull base as “Surgery of the lateral skull base”. “50 years of endeavour” points to the great effort which has been made over the last decades, when more and more difficult surgeries were performed by reducing morbidity. The principle of lateral skull base surgery, “remove skull base bone to approach the base itself and the adjacent sites of the endo-esocranium”, was then combined with function preservation and with tailoring surgery to the pathology. The concept that histology dictates the extent of resection, balancing the intrinsic morbidity of each approach was the object of the first section of the present report. The main surgical approaches were described in the second section and were conceived not as a step-by-step description of technique, but as the highlighthening of the surgical principles. The third section was centered on open issues related to the tumor and its treatment. The topic of vestibular schwannoma was investigated with the current debate on observation, hearing preservation surgery, hearing rehabilitation, radiotherapy and the recent efforts to detect biological markers able to predict tumor growth. Jugular foramen paragangliomas were treated in the frame of radical or partial surgery, radiotherapy, partial “tailored” surgery and observation. Surgery on meningioma was debated from the point of view of the neurosurgeon and of the otologist. Endolymphatic sac tumors and malignant tumors of the external auditory canal were also treated, as well as chordomas, chondrosarcomas and petrous bone cholesteatomas. Finally, the fourth section focused on free-choice topics which were assigned to aknowledged experts. The aim of this work was attempting to report the state of the art of the lateral skull base surgery after 50 years of hard work and, above all, to raise questions on those issues which still need an answer, as to allow progress in knowledge through sharing of various experiences. At the end of the reading, if more doubts remain rather than certainties, the aim of this work will probably be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Zanoletti
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - A Mazzoni
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - A Martini
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - R V Abbritti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - E Alexandre
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - V Baro
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - S Bartolini
- Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - D Bernardeschi
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - R Bivona
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Bonali
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - I Borghesi
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - D Borsetto
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - R Bovo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - M Breun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Julius Maximilians University Hospital Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - F Calbucci
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - M L Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - A Caruso
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - P Cayé-Thomasen
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D Cazzador
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Section of Human Anatomy, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - P-O Champagne
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - R Colangeli
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - G Conte
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - D D'Avella
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - G Danesi
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - L Deantonio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - L Denaro
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - F Di Berardino
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - R Draghi
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - F H Ebner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - N Favaretto
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - G Ferri
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | | | - S Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - L Girasoli
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - B R Grossardt
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Guidi
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - R Hagen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - S Hanakita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - D G Hardy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - V C Iglesias
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - S Jefferies
- Oncology Department, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Jia
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninh People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiatong University School of Medicine, China
| | - M Kalamarides
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - I N Kanaan
- Department of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, KSA
| | - M Krengli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - A Landi
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - L Lauda
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - D Lepera
- ENT & Skull-Base Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, Legnano (MI), Italy
| | - S Lieber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - S L K Lloyd
- Department of Neuro-Otology and Skull-Base Surgery Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - A Lovato
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit, Padova University, Treviso, Italy
| | - F Maccarrone
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - R Macfarlane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Magnan
- University Aix-Marseille, France
| | - L Magnoni
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - D Marchioni
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Italy
| | | | - G Marioni
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | | | - C Matthies
- Department of Neurosurgery, Julius Maximilians University Hospital Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - D A Moffat
- Department of Neuro-otology and Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Munari
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - M Nardone
- ENT Department, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - R Pareschi
- ENT & Skull-Base Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, Legnano (MI), Italy
| | - C Pavone
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | | | - G Piras
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - L Presutti
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - G Restivo
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Reznitsky
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Roca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - A Russo
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - M Sanna
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - L Sartori
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - M Scheich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - W Shehata-Dieler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - D Soloperto
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Italy
| | - F Sorrentino
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - O Sterkers
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - A Taibah
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - M Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - G Tealdo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - D Vlad
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - H Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninh People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiatong University School of Medicine, China
| | - D Zanetti
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Patel NS, Carlson ML, Pollock BE, Driscoll CLW, Neff BA, Foote RL, Lohse CM, Link MJ. Long-term tumor control following stereotactic radiosurgery for jugular paraganglioma using 3D volumetric segmentation. J Neurosurg 2019; 130:379-387. [PMID: 29652232 DOI: 10.3171/2017.10.jns17764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The morbidity of gross-total resection of jugular paraganglioma (JP) is often unacceptable due to the potential for irreversible lower cranial neuropathy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been used at the authors' institution since 1990 for the treatment of JP and other benign intracranial tumors. Conventional means of assessing tumor progression using linear measurements or elliptical approximations are imprecise due to the irregular shape and insinuating growth pattern of JP. The objective of this study was to assess long-term tumor control in these patients by using slice-by-slice 3D volumetric segmentation of serial MRI data. METHODS Radiographic data and clinical records were reviewed retrospectively at a single, tertiary-care academic referral center for patients treated from 1990 to 2017. Volumetric analyses by integration of consecutive tumor cross-sectional areas (tumor segmentation) of serial MRI data were performed. Tumor progression was defined as volumetric growth of 15% or greater over the imaging interval. Primary outcomes analyzed included survival free of radiographic and clinical progression. Secondary outcomes included new or worsened cranial neuropathy. RESULTS A total of 85 patients were treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for JP at the authors' institution over the last 27 years. Sixty patients had pretreatment and serial posttreatment contrast-enhanced MRI follow-up suitable for volumetric analysis. A total of 214 MR images were analyzed to segment tumor images in a slice-by-slice fashion to calculate integral tumor volume. The median follow-up duration was 66 months (range 7-202 months). At 5 years the tumor progression-free survival rate was 98%. Three tumors exhibited progression more than 10 years after GKRS. Estimated survival free of radiographic progression rates (95% confidence interval [CI]; n = number still at risk) at 5, 10, and 15 years following radiosurgery were 98% (95% CI 94%-100%; n = 34), 94% (95% CI 85%-100%; n = 16), and 74% (95% CI 56%-98%; n = 6), respectively. One patient with tumor progression required treatment intervention using external beam radiation therapy, constituting the only case of clinical progression. Two patients (3%) without preexisting lower cranial nerve dysfunction developed new ipsilateral vocal fold paralysis following radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS SRS achieves excellent long-term tumor control for JP without a high risk for new or worsened cranial neuropathy when used in primary, combined modality, or recurrent settings. Long-term follow-up is critical due to the potential for late radiographic progression (i.e., more than 10 years after SRS). As none of the patients with late progression have required salvage therapy, the clinical implications of this degree of tumor growth have yet to be determined.
Collapse
|
8
|
Spina A, Boari N, Gagliardi F, Bailo M, Del Vecchio A, Bolognesi A, Mortini P. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for glomus tumors: Long-term results in a series of 30 patients. Head Neck 2018; 40:2677-2684. [PMID: 30456888 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glomus tumors are rare and benign hypervascular tumors. Surgery represented the mainstay of their treatment, even if it has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, the treatment shifted to a multimodal approach and Gamma Knife radiosurgery represents one of the treatment options. METHODS Authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiological outcome of a series of patients who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery for glomus tumors. RESULTS Thirty patients underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Mean tumor volume was 7.69 cc (range 0.36-24.6). Mean tumor margin dose was 16 Gy (range 13-18). Median follow-up was of 91 months (mean 90; range 11-172). Overall clinical control rate was 100%; overall volumetric tumor control rate was 96.6%. Patients' and tumors' characteristics, treatment data, and outcome have been analyzed. CONCLUSION Gamma Knife radiosurgery represents a safe and effective treatment for glomus tumors. Longer follow-up and larger cohort studies are needed to definitively outline the role of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for glomus tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfio Spina
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Boari
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Gagliardi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Bailo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Del Vecchio
- Service of Medical Physics, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Bolognesi
- Service of Radiation Oncology, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Outcomes of Primary Radiosurgery Treatment of Glomus Jugulare Tumors: Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39:1079-1087. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
10
|
|
11
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine treatment outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glomus jugulare tumors (GJT), focusing on three-dimensional volume change and symptoms before and after SRS, as well as complications related to SRS. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Thirty-eight patients treated with SRS between 2000 and 2015. INTERVENTION SRS treatment of GJT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The tumor volumes on pre- and posttreatment imaging were compared utilizing the Leskell GammaPlan treatment plan software to assess tumor progression. Pre- and posttreatment symptoms, Fisch classification, and complications were recorded. RESULTS The mean radiographic follow-up was 39.1 months. The mean dose-to-tumor margin was 13.2 Gy. The mean tumor size at treatment was 5.8 and 5.2 cm at last follow-up. Thirty-three patients had follow-up imaging suitable for analysis. When defining both 10 and 15% tumor size increases as significant, 27 (82%) and 29 (88%) tumors decreased in size or remained stable, respectively. For the seven tumors with documented pre-SRS growth, treatment success was 86%. The mean marginal dose for treatment success and failure were 13.2 and 13.7 Gy, respectively. Patients receiving a higher margin dose had a greater risk of tumor progression (p = 0.0277). Fisch classification did not impact tumor progression rate. Initial tumor volume had no significance on tumor response to SRS. CONCLUSIONS SRS is an effective treatment option for GJT. Both initial tumor volume and Fisch classification did not impact tumor progression. There were no significant patient or lesion characteristics that distinguished treatment success and/or failure.
Collapse
|
12
|
Schuster D, Sweeney AD, Stavas MJ, Tawfik KY, Attia A, Cmelak AJ, Wanna GB. Initial radiographic tumor control is similar following single or multi-fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for jugular paragangliomas. Am J Otolaryngol 2016; 37:255-8. [PMID: 27178519 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Revised: 01/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate radiographic tumor control and treatment-related toxicity in glomus jugulare tumors treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTING Tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS Glomus jugulare tumors treated with SRS between 1998 and 2014 were identified. The data analysis only included patients with at least 18months of post-treatment follow up (FU). INTERVENTION Patients were treated with either single fraction or fractionated SRS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were assessed. Radiographic control was determined by comparing pre and post treatment MRI, and was categorized as no change, regression, or progression. RESULTS Eighteen patients were treated with SRS, and 14 met inclusion criteria. Median age at treatment was 55years (range 35-79), and 71.4% of patients were female. 5 patients (35.7%) received single fraction SRS (dose range 15-18Gy), and 9 (64.3%) fractionated therapy (dose 3-7Gy×3-15 fractions). Median tumor volume was 3.78cm(3) (range 1.15-30.6). Median FU was 28.8months (range 18.6-56.1), with a mean of 31.7months. At their last recorded MRI, 7 patients (50%) had tumor stability, 6 (42.9%) had improvement, and 1 (7.1%) had progression. Disease improvement and progression rates in the single fraction group were 40% and 0%, and in the multiple-fraction group, 44.4% and 11.1%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in disease improvement (p=0.88) or progression (p=0.48) rates between groups (unpaired t-test). CONCLUSIONS At a median follow up of 28months, both single fraction and fractionated SRS appear to have comparable radiographic tumor control outcomes and toxicity profiles.
Collapse
|
13
|
Martín IT, Ávila RDM, Herrera MZ, Arregui G, Osorio-Ceballos JL, Rojas ES, Almansa ÁH, Arrebola JP, Rull JP, Hernández JE, Ramírez EL. Role of radiosurgery in the management of glomus tumors. Head Neck 2015; 38 Suppl 1:E798-804. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.24103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Tovar Martín
- Radiation Oncology Department; Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital; Granada Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Enrique Saura Rojas
- Neurosurgery Department; Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital; Granada Spain
| | | | - Juan P. Arrebola
- Radiation Oncology Department; Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital; Granada Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP); Granada Spain
| | - Jorge Pastor Rull
- Neuroradiology Department; Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital; Granada Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jacob JT, Pollock BE, Carlson ML, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of vestibular schwannoma and glomus jugulare: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2015; 48:515-26. [PMID: 25873444 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKS) has become an important management strategy for an increasing number of patients with skull base tumors. For select patients with lateral skull base disorders, given the proximity to sensitive critical structures such as the brainstem, cranial nerves, and cochlea, this technology has emerged as a first-line treatment to achieve the paramount goals of long-term tumor control and maintenance of existing neurologic function. This article reviews the indications, technique, and results of GKS for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma and glomus jugulare tumors, and highlights our experience in treating these tumors at the Mayo Clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey T Jacob
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Bruce E Pollock
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Matthew L Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Colin L W Driscoll
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Michael J Link
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Künzel J, de Tristan J, Mantsopoulos K, Koch M, Baussmerth M, Zenk J, Iro H. Experiences in the treatment of patients with multiple head and neck paragangliomas. Am J Otolaryngol 2014; 35:294-9. [PMID: 24629588 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2014] [Accepted: 02/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze treatment results in the multidisciplinary management of patients with multiple head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs). METHODS Retrospective analysis including all patients with multiple HNPs (VP, vagal paraganglioma; JTP, jugulotympanic paraganglioma; CBT, carotid body tumor) treated between 2000 and 2013 at a tertiary referral center. RESULTS Ten patients (three men, seven women) had 25 HNPs (two VPs, eight JTPs, and 15 CBTs). The age range at diagnosis was 31-71 years (mean 40.9 years, median 37 years). Nine tumors (four CBTs, three JTPs, two VPs) were treated only with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT; 50.4-56Gy, mean 55.3Gy) or in one case intensity-modulated radiotherapy (60 Gy). Nine tumors were treated with surgery alone (eight CBTs, one JTP) and three JTPs with subtotal surgery combined with adjuvant SRT. A "wait and scan" strategy was used in three cases (two CBTs, one JTP). The mean follow-up period was 4.3 years (range 0.1-13 years, median 4 years). The rate of tumor control with surgery and/or SRT was 100% (21/21). One patient with a wait-and-scan strategy for CBT had slow asymptomatic progression during a 13-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The treatment results in this series of patients with multiple HNPs show that a very high rate of long-term tumor control with low morbidity can be achieved using tailored and individualized approaches. All of the different treatment strategies available should be discussed with the patient. In particular, the treatment should involve a multidisciplinary team of experts in the fields of nuclear medicine, genetics, pathology, radiology, radio-oncology, and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Künzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Medical School, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Julie de Tristan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Medical School, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Mantsopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Medical School, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Koch
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Medical School, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marcela Baussmerth
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Medical School, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Zenk
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Medical School, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Heinrich Iro
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Medical School, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Künzel J, Koch M, Brase C, Fietkau R, Iro H, Zenk J. Treatment of cervical paragangliomas: is surgery the only way? Am J Otolaryngol 2014; 35:186-91. [PMID: 24051237 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2013] [Revised: 08/05/2013] [Accepted: 08/12/2013] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the results after surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in the treatment of cervical paragangliomas. Against this background, the decision-making algorithm used in the treatment of carotid body tumors (CBTs) and vagal paragangliomas (VPs) was reevaluated relative to the existing literature on the topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study between 2000 and 2012. A total of 27 CBTs and nine VPs in 32 patients were treated. Shamblin class I: 59.3% (n=16); class II: 29.6% (n=8); class III: 11.1% (n=3). Treatment modalities were surgery, radiotherapy, or observation. The end points for analysis were long-term tumor control and integrity of the cranial nerves. RESULTS 21 CBTs and seven VPs underwent surgery; SRT was performed in three CBTs and two VPs. Three CBTs were clinically observed. Permanent nerve paresis followed after surgery for CBTs in five patients (20%) and in all patients with VPs. No impaired cranial nerve function resulted after SRT. The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. The tumor control rate after therapy for CBTs and VPs was 100%. One CBT that received clinical observation showed slow tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS A surgical procedure should be regarded as the treatment of choice in patients with small CBTs. In larger CBTs, particularly in elderly patients with unimpaired cranial nerves, radical surgery should be regarded critically. As surgery for VPs caused regularly impairment of cranial nerves with functional disturbances of various degrees a comprehensive consultation with the patient is mandatory and nonsurgical strategies should be discussed.
Collapse
|
17
|
Glomus Jugulare Presenting with Isolated Facial Nerve Palsy. Surg Res Pract 2014; 2014:514086. [PMID: 25374954 PMCID: PMC4208587 DOI: 10.1155/2014/514086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2013] [Accepted: 10/14/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Glomus jugulare is a rare slow growing tumor occurring within the jugular foramen that rarely presents with isolated symptoms. Although histologically benign, these tumors are locally destructive because of their proximity to the petrous bone, the lower cranial nerves, and the major vascular structures (Miller et al. (2009) and Silverstone (1973)). We wish to report a glomus jugulare tumor eroding the petrous bone and producing an ipsilateral peripheral facial weakness. The mechanism of this erosion is discussed.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze current ratio of neurotologists to the population and examine regional variation. STUDY DESIGN Population survey examining hospital referral regions (HRRs) as defined in the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care Project and location of members of the American Neurotology Society. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Ratio of neurotologists to the population within designated HRRs. RESULTS The national estimate of practicing neurotologists per population in 2006 was 1:922664 persons. The ratio is not uniform across HRRs, indicating that referral patterns for neurotologic care are wider than the care for indicators used in designating HRRs. Distribution of specialists is closely correlated with population. Estimated procedures per population are stable or declining for lateral cranial base surgery, implying current or impending oversupply of neurotologists. CONCLUSION The number of specialists in Neurotology likely exceeds projected needs. The current supply of trainees predicts this trend will continue for decades. Development and maintenance of lateral cranial base surgical skills will be difficult for some practitioners.
Collapse
|
19
|
Faragò G, Castellani C, Ponzi S, Jankovic C, Saginario V, Berardi C, Pollo B, Ciceri EF. Preoperative embolization of carotid chemodectoma: a technical challenge that can be customized according to angioarchitecture. Illustrative cases. Neuroradiol J 2013; 26:678-82. [PMID: 24355187 DOI: 10.1177/197140091302600611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2013] [Accepted: 11/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative embolization of carotid paraganglioma is increasingly used to reduce the risk of surgical bleeding obtaining a more precise and extensive tumor resection. Currently the technique can be customized in consideration of the different tumor angioarchitecture, thanks to embolic materials with different vascular penetration: solid particles of polyvinyl-alcohol (PVA), histoacryl glue, and liquid polymer (Onyx(®)). Two cases of swelling dissection with volume progression over time came to our observation. Both patients (45 and 70-year-old women) were studied with neck ultrasound imaging and computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance (MR). In both cases the radiological investigations confirmed the clinical suspicion of carotid paraganglioma. Both patients were sent for angiography control and preoperative devascularization of the lesion. The treatment was performed under general anesthesia using, depending on the type of tumor vasculature, in case 1 solid particles of PVA and histoacryl glue, and in case 2 Onyx(®) (Covidien, Irvine). The patients successfully underwent excision of the lesion via cervicotomy within a week from the embolization procedure, without any complications. The histological findings confirmed the diagnosis of chemodectoma, and macrophage infiltrates were seen in the regions previously embolized. At one-year follow-up, there was no evidence of recurrent disease. The preoperative embolization of vascular lesions of the neck represents a safe technique that yields the best results when customized over the type of vascularization of the lesion, enabling the use of the most appropriate materials, depending on the case to be treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Faragò
- Interventional Neuroradiology, "C.Besta" Fondazione Neurological Institute; Milan, Italy -
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lieberson RE, Adler JR, Soltys SG, Choi C, Gibbs IC, Chang SD. Stereotactic radiosurgery as the primary treatment for new and recurrent paragangliomas: is open surgical resection still the treatment of choice? World Neurosurg 2012; 77:745-61. [PMID: 22818172 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2010] [Revised: 01/16/2011] [Accepted: 03/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Paragangliomas (PGs) or glomus tumors are rare, and publications comparing treatment alternatives are few. We sought to analyze our experience with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), review the literature, and develop treatment guidelines. METHODS We retrospectively examined the outcomes of 41 PGs in 36 patients treated with SRS at Stanford. Our data from medical records, telephone interviews, and imaging studies were combined with previously reported SRS data and compared to results following other treatments. RESULTS With a median clinical follow-up of 4.8 years (3.9 years radiographic), local control was 100%. Complications included increase in preexistent vertigo in one patient and transient cranial neuropathies in two patients. Published surgical series describe a lower local control rate as well as more frequent and severe complications. Published radiation therapy (RT) series document a slightly lower local control rate than SRS, but SRS can be delivered more quickly and conveniently. Open surgery and other combinations of treatments appear to be required for several subpopulations of PG patients. CONCLUSIONS We feel that SRS should be the primary treatment for most new and recurrent PGs. Even some very large PGs are appropriate for SRS. RT remains an appropriate option in some centers, especially those where SRS is not available. PGs occurring in the youngest patients, catecholamine secreting PGs, and PGs causing rapidly progressing neurologic deficits may be more appropriate for open resection. Metastatic PGs may benefit from combinations of chemotherapy and SRS or RT. Treatment guidelines are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Lieberson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brase C, Neumann H, Lell M, Schwarz-Furlan S, Rogler K, Hornung J. Junger Patient mit Paragangliomsyndrom Typ 1. HNO 2012; 60:721-4. [DOI: 10.1007/s00106-011-2407-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
22
|
Künzel J, Iro H, Hornung J, Koch M, Brase C, Klautke G, Zenk J. Function-preserving therapy for jugulotympanic paragangliomas: A retrospective analysis from 2000 to 2010. Laryngoscope 2012; 122:1545-51. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.23268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2012] [Accepted: 01/30/2012] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
23
|
Lee CC, Pan DHC, Wu JC, Chung WY, Wu HM, Yang HC, Liu KD, Guo WY, Shih YH. Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Glomus Jugulare and Tympanicum. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2011; 89:291-8. [DOI: 10.1159/000328890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2010] [Accepted: 04/26/2011] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
24
|
Guss ZD, Batra S, Limb CJ, Li G, Sughrue ME, Redmond K, Rigamonti D, Parsa AT, Chang S, Kleinberg L, Lim M. Radiosurgery of glomus jugulare tumors: a meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:e497-502. [PMID: 21703782 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2010] [Revised: 04/22/2011] [Accepted: 05/10/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE During the past two decades, radiosurgery has arisen as a promising approach to the management of glomus jugulare. In the present study, we report on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available published data on the radiosurgical management of glomus jugulare tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS To identify eligible studies, systematic searches of all glomus jugulare tumors treated with radiosurgery were conducted in major scientific publication databases. The data search yielded 19 studies, which were included in the meta-analysis. The data from 335 glomus jugulare patients were extracted. The fixed effects pooled proportions were calculated from the data when Cochrane's statistic was statistically insignificant and the inconsistency among studies was <25%. Bias was assessed using the Egger funnel plot test. RESULTS Across all studies, 97% of patients achieved tumor control, and 95% of patients achieved clinical control. Eight studies reported a mean or median follow-up time of >36 months. In these studies, 95% of patients achieved clinical control and 96% achieved tumor control. The gamma knife, linear accelerator, and CyberKnife technologies all exhibited high rates of tumor and clinical control. CONCLUSIONS The present study reports the results of a meta-analysis for the radiosurgical management of glomus jugulare. Because of its high effectiveness, we suggest considering radiosurgery for the primary management of glomus jugulare tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary D Guss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Graillon T, Fuentes S, Régis J, Metellus P, Brunel H, Roche PH, Dufour H. Multidisciplinary management of giant functional petrous bone paraganglioma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153:85-9; discussion 89. [PMID: 20931241 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-010-0818-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2010] [Accepted: 09/23/2010] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Giant and functional paragangliomas of the skull base are rare. Their endocrinological and surgical management is challenging. We report the case of an aggressive giant noradrenalin-secreting paraganglioma of the right temporal bone. Three procedures of embolisation were performed. The second one was complicated by a hypertensive crisis due to catecholamine release. The tumour was resected via a widened transcochlear approach. Tumour residue was treated by gamma knife radiosurgery, without additional growth at the last follow-up. This case illustrates the interest of multidisciplinary management of giant skull base paragangliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Graillon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital La Timone, 264 rue Saint Pierre 13385 Marseille cedex 05, Marseille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|