Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty

Change in Femoral Offset after Closed Reduction and Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis Via Lateral Approach in Patients with Medial Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Closed reduction and dynamic hip screw (DHS) osteosynthesis are preferred as joint-preserving therapy in case of medial femoral neck fractures (MFNFs). A change in the femoral offset (CFO) can cause gait abnormality, impingement, or greater trochanteric pain syndrome. It is unknown whether the femoral offset (FO) can be postoperatively fully restored. The aim of the study was to investigate the extent of a possible CFO in hip joints after DHS osteosynthesis in the case of an MFNF.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 104 patients (mean age: 71.02 years, men: n = 50, women: n = 54) with MFNF who underwent closed reduction and DHS osteosynthesis were analyzed by postoperative x-rays to assess CFO between the operated (OS) and nonoperated joint side (NOS). The studies covered the time period 2010-2020. A statistical comparison was performed between the mean values of FO between OS and NOS, taking into account patient age, gender, and fracture severity.

RESULTS

All operated hip joints showed a CFO. In 76.0% (79 of 104), the FO decreased (FOD), and in 24.0% (25 of 104), the FO increased (FOI). A critical CFO (>15% CFO) was detected in 52.9% (55 of 104). In hip joints with postoperative FOD, the mean FO between NOS (49.15 mm [±6.56]) and OS (39.32 mm [±7.87]) and in hip joints with postoperative FOI the mean FO between NOS (41.59 [±8.21]) and OS (47.27 [±6.68]) differed significantly (p < 0.001). Preoperative FO (rS: -0.41; p > 0.001) and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD; rS: 0.34; p > 0.001) correlated with postoperative CFO. FOD was found in hip joints with a preoperative FO >44 mm and CCD <134° vice versa FOI in hip joints with a preoperative FO <44 mm and CCD >134°.

CONCLUSION

Closed reduction and DHS osteosynthesis in patients with MFNF result in a clustered significant CFO. The individual FO should be taken into account pre- and intraoperatively to avoid a postoperative extensive CFO.

Impact of Offset and Leg Length on Functional Outcomes Post-Total Hip Arthroplasty: How Accurate Should Coronal Reconstruction Be?

BACKGROUND

Accurate hip reconstruction is associated with improved biomechanical behavior following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, whether this is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is unknown.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

This study aimed to: 1) describe the ability to reconstruct coronal geometry during THA without advanced technology; 2) assess whether restoration of global offset (GO) and leg length (LL) is associated with improved PROs; and 3) investigate whether increased femoral offset (FO) to compensate for reduced acetabular offset (AO) influences PROs.

METHOD

This was a prospective, multicenter, consecutive cohort study of 500 patients treated with primary THA without robotics or navigation. The Oxford Hip score (OHS) was obtained preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. Supine anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were analyzed to determine AO, FO, GO, and LL relative to the native contralateral side. Contour plots for ΔOHS based on ΔLL and ΔGO were created, and ΔOHS was calculated within and outside various ranges (±2.5, ±5, or ±10 mm).

RESULTS

In the operated hip, mean FO increased by 3 ± 6 mm (range, -16 to 27), while AO decreased by 2 ± 4 mm (range, -17 to 10). The contour graph for ±2.5 mm zones showed the best outcomes (ΔOHS >25) with GO and LL centered on 0 ± 2.5 mm (P < .01). However, only 10% achieved such reconstruction. When GO and LL differences were within ±10 mm, ΔOHS was superior when both AO and FO were within ±5 mm (mean: 24 ± 10; range, -5 to 40) compared with when FO was above 5 mm to compensate for a reduction in AO (mean: 22 ± 11; range, -10 to 46; P = .040).

CONCLUSIONS

The PROs were associated with biomechanical reconstruction, and the best clinical improvement can be expected when GO and LL differences are both within 2.5 mm. Maintenance of AO is important, as compensation by increasing FO is associated with inferior OHS.

Analysis of risk factors for modification of femoral offset after internal fixation of Garden I and II femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

The concept of restoring the femoral offset is well established during hip replacement surgery, but is less well known when treating Garden I or II femoral neck fractures by internal fixation. And yet, the therapeutic aim for these fractures is to restore this native parameter as best possible. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for reduction of femoral offset after union of a Garden I or II femoral neck fracture treated by internal fixation.

HYPOTHESIS

After internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture, certain factors may contribute to reducing the femoral offset, which itself has been identified as being responsible for altering the patients' quality of life and functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter study included 193 patients who had a Garden I or II femoral neck fracture treated by cannulated screws or a sliding compression screw-plate. The difference between the femoral offset in the operated hip and that of the contralateral hip was measured in weightbearing patients after the fracture had healed. This difference was the primary outcome measure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to look for risk factors contributing to femoral neck shortening.

RESULTS

Based on the univariate analysis, being more than 85 years of age, having a Garden I fracture, and cannulated screw fixation were associated with a significantly greater reduction in the femoral offset. In the multivariate analysis, only Garden I fractures were associated with a greater reduction in femoral offset.

DISCUSSION

Garden I fractures were associated with a greater reduction in the offset, although there was no evidence that this change was related to early weightbearing. By identifying this risk factor, surgeons can optimize the indications given that the treatment of these fractures is still widely debated and there is still no consensus as to the best method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Do Cementless Stems Match Any Hip? A Description of Anthropometric Measurements of the Proximal Femur in Colombia

Background

Leg length discrepancy following hip arthroplasty causes dissatisfaction to the patient; thus, preoperative planning and implant selection is critical. The purpose of this study was to measure the articular-trochanteric distance (ATD) and femoral neck length (FNL) in our population and compare them to those of 3 of the most used uncemented stems.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 401 hip radiographs of healthy adults were collected between January and July 2022. The vertical ATD and FNL were measured. A linear regression model was used to identify the relationship between these measurements and age, sex, and height. A logistic regression model was used to assess the matching of native hips with the neck length of the stem.

Results

Mean age was 60 years, and 74.56% were women. In 94.3% of hips, the ATD was negative, 3.73% neutral, and 2% positive. In our population, 0.25% of FNL were shorter than POLARSTEM (Smith & Nephew, UK), 10.72% shorter than MetaFix stem (Corin, UK), and 11.97% shorter than Corail stem (DePuy Synthes, USA). In the logistic regression analysis, matching for the POLARSTEM was associated with age but not with sex or height. Conversely, for MetaFix and Corail, stem matching was associated with sex and height.

Conclusions

Anthropometric hip measurements vary among individuals, and variables such as age, sex, and height must be considered during preoperative planning and implant selection to avoid leg length discrepancy. Additional studies, including different implants, are required to guide surgeons in selecting a femoral stem that best matches the patient's native hip.

Accuracy of two-dimensional digital planning in uncemented primary hip arthroplasty: monocentric analysis of eight hundred implants

PURPOSE

In the last decades, there has been a refinement in total hip arthroplasty, which allowed surgeons to achieve the highest performance and better patient outcomes. Preoperative planning in primary hip arthroplasty is an essential step that guides the surgeon in restoring the anatomy and biomechanics of the joint. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the 2D digital planning, considering cup sizing, stem sizing, and limb length discrepancy. Additionally, we conducted a multivariable analysis of demographic data and comorbidities to find factors influencing preoperative planning.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the planning accuracy in 800 consecutive uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty. We compared the preoperatively planned total hip arthroplasty with postoperative results regarding the planned component size, the implanted size, and the lower limb length restoration. Therefore, we investigated factors influencing planning accuracy: overweight and obesity, sex, age, past medical history, comorbidities, and implant design. All the surgeries were performed in the posterolateral approach by one expert surgeon who did the preoperative planning. The preoperative planning was determined to be (a) exact if the planned and the implanted components were the same size and (b) accurate if exact ± one size. The restoration of postoperative limb length discrepancy was classified into three groups: ± 3 mm, ± 5 mm, and ± 10 mm. This assessment was performed through a digital method 2D based on a standard hip X-ray.

RESULTS

This court of 800 implants showed that planning was exact in 60% of the cups and 44% of the stems and was accurate in 94% of the cups and 80% of the stems. The postoperative limb length discrepancy was ± 3 mm in 91% and ± 5 mm in 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed preoperative 2D digital planning great precision and reliability, and we demonstrated that it was accurate in 94% of the cups and 80% of the stems. Therefore, the preoperative limb length discrepancy analysis was essential to guarantee the recovery of the operated limb's correct length.

Do all short stem types restore biomechanical parameters of the hip? Comparison according to femoral neck osteotomy levels

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on ideal short femoral stem design. A classification system proposed by Feyen and Shimmin divides short stems in two types according to femoral neck osteotomy levels: subcapital (IIIA) and standard (IIIB). The study aims to determine which design type is more successful in restoring native biomechanical parameters and whether stem type has an impact on clinical results.

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative study, patients that have undergone short stem hip arthroplasty were evaluated according to stem types: type IIIA (n = 52, 66.7%) (Mathys Optimys) and IIIB (n = 26, 33.3%) (Implantcast Aida and Smith & Nephew SMF). Pelvis X-rays were assessed in terms of femoral neck length, horizontal and vertical hip centres of rotation, horizontal and vertical femoral offsets, abductor lever arm lengths, leg lengths, and stem-shaft angles. Improvement in Harris hip scores, differences between post-operative and pre-operative measurements, and stem-shaft angles were evaluated and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Mean femoral neck resection (8.27 ± 6.68 mm in IIIA and 15 ± 6.33 mm in IIIB) was significantly different between both groups (p < 0.001). Harris hip scores were increased at post-operative six months in both groups with no difference (84.4 ± 6.4 and 84.6 ± 5.5, p = 0.4). The absolute values of differences between pre-operative and post-operative horizontal centres of rotation (p = 0.63), vertical centers of rotation (p = 0.75), horizontal femoral offsets (p = 0.78), vertical femoral offsets (p = 0.83), abductor lever arm distances (p = 0.63), and leg length (p = 0.21) measurements were not different between both groups. Stem positions were both varus with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

We found no difference regarding restoration of biomechanical parameters between short stem designs with different levels of neck osteotomy. Additionally, short stem can mostly result in varus component positioning regardless of the level of neck osteotomy.

An Intraoperative Technique to Assess Tissue Tension and Leg Length When Aligning the Hip Centre of Rotation With the Acetabulum in Hip Arthroplasties

Hip arthroplasties are cost-effective procedures; however, instability and leg length discrepancy are common complications that can lead to higher revision rates and patient dissatisfaction. Preoperative planning aids surgeons in choosing the right offset and neck length before surgery. Nonetheless, intraoperative measures are still necessary due to the differences dictated by the surgical procedure. Several hip trials might be needed to reach the optimum choice of implants. We have introduced a technique that utilizes the trunnion as a reference point to the hip centre of rotation, matching it with the acetabulum centre of rotation after applying the necessary soft tissue tension. This serves as a proximal reference point. Using the trunnion, as opposed to the trial head, allows for a better assessment of tissue tension within the acetabular void, avoiding constraints imposed by the applied trial head. Additionally, determining the acetabulum's centre of rotation is challenging if obscured by the trial head. Matching the two tibial tuberosities indicates the correct leg length, serving as the distal reference point. Both reference points should be considered together to select the right neck length and offset for optimal tissue tension. This technique has been tested on hip arthroplasty patients over five years. All hip surgeons who used this technique agree that it gives a better representation of the tissue tension, easing the challenges when preparing the acetabulum as well as reducing the need for multiple trials.

Femoral anteversion change is associated with ischiofemoral impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective CT evaluation

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the relationship between femoral anteversion (FA), FA change, and ischiofemoral impingement (IFI) and the relationship between FA, femoral offset (FO), and greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, two readers assessed FA and FO on CT images of 197 patients following primary THA with an anterior surgical approach between 2014 and 2021. FA change was calculated relative to preoperative CT, while FO change was calculated relative to preoperative radiographs and classified as decreased (≥-5 mm), increased (≥ + 5 mm), or restored (± 5 mm). Clinical and imaging data were analyzed for IFI and GTPS after surgery. Group differences were evaluated using Student's t-test, chi-square analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

The change in FA was 3.6 ± 3.3° to a postoperative FA of 22.5 ± 6.8°, while FO increased by 1.7 ± 3.5 mm to a postoperative FO of 42.9 ± 7.1 mm. FA and FA change were higher in patients with IFI (p ≤ 0.006), while no significant difference was observed for patients with and without GTPS (p ≥ 0.122). IFI was more common in females (p = 0.023). In the ROC analysis, an AUC of 0.859 was observed for FA change to predict IFI, whereas the AUC value was 0.726 for FA alone. No significant difference was found for FO change in patients with and without IFI or GTPS (p ≥ 0.187).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative FA, FA change, and female sex were associated with IFI after anterior-approached THA. The change in FA was a better predictor of IFI than absolute postoperative FA alone.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The findings of this study suggest that preservation of the preoperative femoral anteversion may reduce postoperative ischiofemoral impingement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

KEY POINTS

• Higher postoperative femoral anteversion and anteversion change were associated with ischiofemoral impingement. • Femoral anteversion change was a better predictor of impingement than absolute postoperative anteversion. • No significant association was found between femoral offset and postoperative hip pain.

Does the limb lengthening reduce the incidence of hip dislocation in patients with neurological disorders and insufficient muscle tension who undergoing hip arthroplasty?

Background

The soft-tissue tension is closely associated with postoperative hip dislocation in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially for those patients with neurological disorders and insufficient muscle tension. The aim of this study is to explore the effect of limb lengthening on the incidence of complications following THA in patients with neurological disorders and insufficient muscle tension.

Methods

This retrospective analysis examines individuals with neurological disorders, such as ischemic stroke and poliomyelitis, who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at our medical center between January 2015 and April 2021. Demographic and baseline characteristics (such as age, gender, muscle strength) were obtained from medical records. The limb length, offset and the positional parameters of both acetabular and femoral component were measured on pre- and postoperative plain radiograph. The primary outcome was the occurrence of hip dislocation. The secondary outcome included the incidence of other complications and the hip function (determined by Harris score). The correlation between the occurrence of hip dislocation and limb lengthening was analyzed.

Results

A total of 258 patients were finally analyzed. The hip dislocations were identified in 35 patients (overall incidence = 13.57%). The incidence of early dislocation was lower in patients whose limb-length discrepancy (LLD) was over 20 mm (incidence = 4.1% for LLD >20 mm, 12.2% for LLD 10 mm-20 mm and 17% for LLD <10 mm). The odds ratio (OR) was 0.206 and 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.058-0.737 (compared between LLD <10 mm and LLD >20 mm). But the no difference was identified regarding on the incidence of late dislocation among patients with different LLD. Moreover, the overall incidence of other complications was elevated in patients with LLD >20 mm (incidence = 17.58% for LLD >20 mm, 11.11% for LLD 10 mm-20 mm and 3.19% for LLD <10 mm; OR = 6.464, 95% CI = 1.768-23.640). And the Harris scores, which reflected the hip function, was gradually decreased with the increasing in LLD. In terms of the relationship between the offset and dislocation rate, it was found that increased offset discrepancy was associated with decreased dislocation incidence (incidence = 4.71% for offset discrepancy >10 mm, 12.5% for offset discrepancy 5 mm-10 mm and 17.20% for offset discrepancy <5 mm; OR = 0.238, 95% CI = 0.076-0.742). Furthermore, increased offset discrepancy also bring a reduction in late dislocation. The incidences of late dislocation were 0%, 2.5% and 10.8% for offset discrepancy >10 mm, offset discrepancy 5 mm-10 mm and 17.20% for offset discrepancy respectively. Different from that of LDD, the incidences of other complications were similar among patients with different offset discrepancy. Besides, no influence of offset discrepancy on the hip function was identified in this study.

Conclusion

Unfortunately, although increasing in limb length could partially reduce early dislocation postoperatively, it could not affect the incidence of late dislocation in those patients with neurological disorders and insufficient muscle tension. Moreover, over limb lengthening was associated with other postoperative complications and worse hip function. Instead, additional offset could reduce the probability of postoperative dislocation, without increasing the incidence of other complications. Therefore, femoral stem with lower cervico-diaphyseal angle (higher offset) should be recommended to patients with neurological disorders who were in high risk of postoperative dislocation. Isolated increasing in limb length should be avoided.

Analysis on association between sagittal stem alignment and early functional and radiological outcome following primary cementless total hip replacement

INTRODUCTION

Accurate reconstruction of hip anatomy and biomechanics is mandatory for achieving good clinical outcomes following total hip replacement (THR). Optimal stem alignment is essential to avoid impingement or loosening. This study aimed to evaluate sagittal stem position following cementless THR and its relationship with patient's functional outcome and post-operative radiological parameters.

METHOD

We performed analytical observational study with cross-sectional design on 71 hips (67 patients, ranged 18-85 years old) that underwent primary cementless THR in two orthopedic centers in Jakarta, Indonesia. All hips were operated through either anterolateral or posterior approach using either extended/full-coating wedge-tapered stem or proximal-coated wedge-tapered stem. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at follow-up time using mHHS questionnaire, VAS level of thigh pain, and hip ROM. Stem sagittal alignment and other radiological parameters, including combined anteversion and offset, were measured from conventional radiograph.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences on mHHS score, VAS level on thigh pain, and ROM between stem alignment groups. Post-operative anteversion and offset of the implant were not affected by the stem sagittal position. All influencing factors have significant effect on sagittal stem alignment. Linear regression test on femur morphology showed 0.69° increase in stem posterior tilt for every 1° increase in the anterior bowing (coeff. = 0.502).

CONCLUSION

Stem tilting in sagittal plane did not affect patient's functional outcome or post-operative radiological parameters. In addition, for every degree of increased anterior femoral bowing, 0.69° increase in posterior stem tilting can be expected.

Extended offset stems are infrequently required in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty and low usage does not compromise stability

INTRODUCTION

Extended offset (EO) stems are commonly used in posterior approach (PA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), but usage rates and complications are not well studied with anterior approach (AA) THA. This study evaluated usage rates, radiographic outcomes and complications following AA THA between patients receiving EO stems and a matched cohort receiving standard offset (SO) stems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective review evaluated 1515 consecutive AA THA performed between 2014 and 2021. The recent 100 EO were included in radiographic and complication analysis and were matched to 100 SO stems based on stem size, procedure (unilateral/bilateral), sex, body mass index (BMI), and age. Data collection included patient demographics; pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements of leg length difference (LLD) and global hip offset difference (GHOD); and complications within 1 year. Independent t-tests and Chi-squared analyses compared EO and SO groups.

RESULTS

EO was utilized in 8% of all AA THA. Despite matching procedures, the distribution of racial groups was different between EO and SO groups, respectively: Caucasian (75% vs. 43%), Asian (12% vs. 35%), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NHPI) (9% vs. 13%), and other (4% vs. 9%) (p < 0.001). No fractures, dislocations, or revisions occurred within 1 year after surgery in either group. One deep infection was noted in the SO group. The proportions of patients following surgery who had a GHOD < 6 mm (76% vs. 82%; p = 0.193) and LLD < 6 mm (81% vs. 86%; p = 0.223) were not significantly different between EO and SO groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prioritizing hip symmetry over stability results in a high proportion of patients achieving hip symmetry without high usage of EO stems in AA THA. Furthermore, low use of EO stems did not result in increased dislocations. Due to racial anatomical differences, Caucasian patients required EO stems to achieve hip symmetry more frequently than Asian and NHPI patients.

High femoral offset as a risk factor for aseptic femoral component loosening in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Lateralized stems in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) showed to be associated with aseptic femoral loosening. However, femoral head length also affects femoral offset but was not considered so far. This study analyzed the impact of high femoral offset (hFO) combinations, formed by lateralized stems or large femoral head lengths, on aseptic femoral component loosening.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients that underwent primary cementless THA at our institution between July 2004 and December 2016. Patients were screened for aseptic femoral component loosening and grouped in aseptic loosening (AL) and non-aseptic loosening (nAL) group. Medical records were screened; implant details were noted and classified in hFO and standard femoral offset (sFO) combinations. Supposed risk factors for aseptic loosening were analyzed.

RESULTS

Two thousand four hundred fifty-nine THA could be included, containing 14 THA (0.6%) with aseptic femoral component loosening. The AL group contained 11 hFO combinations (78.6%), whereas in the nAL group, 1315 hFO combinations (53.8%) were used. Subgroup analysis showed significant difference between two groups for hFO combinations (p = 0.014), age (p = 0.002), NSAR (p = 0.001), and bilateral THA on same day (p = 0.001). The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that hFO combination was the only variable for increased probability of aseptic loosening (OR, 3.7; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

High femoral offset combinations, formed by lateralized stems or large femoral head lengths in our collective of standard straight stems implanted by an anterior approach, show a 3.7-fold increased probability for aseptic femoral component loosening. Adjustment of the postoperative protocol may be considered in these cases to ensure proper stem ingrowth.

Mid-term results of titanium-titanium modular neck femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Modular neck femoral stems are advantageous because they can accurately restore the ideal hip geometry using various options in terms of offset, length, and version. However, there are concerns regarding junctional problems. Despite several reports on such issues, there is a lack of study on mid- to long-term results of these stems. The current study evaluated the mid-term results of patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty using a titanium-titanium (Ti-Ti) modular neck femoral stem.

METHODS

In total, data on 47 hips (42 patients) that could be followed-up for ≥ 5 years after primary total hip arthroplasty using the Ti-Ti modular neck femoral stem from 2011 to 2015 were reviewed. There were 22 male and 20 female patients, and their mean age was 56.3 (range: 31-76) years. The mean follow-up period was 8 (range: 5-12) years. Functional and radiological outcomes, complications, and reoperations were investigated. In addition, we conducted a comparative analysis of the outcomes between those who underwent surgery using the Ti-Ti modular neck femoral stem and 41 hips (35 patients, 19 males and 16 females) that underwent primary total hip arthroplasty using nonmodular femoral stems as a control.

RESULTS

In all Ti-Ti cases, the mean Harris Hip Scores were 50.6 (range: 6-59) preoperatively and 92.7 (range: 78-99) at the last follow-up (P < 0.001). Regarding the neck component's modularity, straight neck components were used in all Ti-Ti cases, and an anteverted or a retroverted neck was not used in any case. Stem revision was performed in one hip due to aseptic loosening. One hip underwent open reduction and internal fixation due to periprosthetic fracture without stem loosening. There were no cases of osteolysis and periprosthetic joint infection and clinically detectable junctional problems. The stem survival rate, with any stem revision as the endpoint, at 12 years was 96.6%. No significant difference was observed in the functional and radiological outcomes beween the Ti-Ti and nonmodular groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ti-Ti modular neck femoral stem had comparable results with broadly used nonmodular femoral stems; hence, it can be a reliable option in primary total hip arthroplasty. However, in terms of the modularity itself of the modular neck femoral stem, whether the modular neck femoral stem is useful in uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty is unclear.

Artificial intelligence-based three-dimensional templating for total joint arthroplasty planning: a scoping review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current status of research on the application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based three-dimensional (3D) templating in preoperative planning of total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

This scoping review followed the PRISMA, PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and five stage methodological framework for scoping reviews. Studies of patients undergoing primary or revision joint arthroplasty surgery that utilised AI-based 3D templating for surgical planning were included. Outcome measures included dataset and model development characteristics, AI performance metrics, and time performance. After AI-based 3D planning, the accuracy of component size and placement estimation and postoperative outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

Nine studies satisfied inclusion criteria including a focus on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based AI templating for use in hip or knee arthroplasty. AI-based 3D templating systems reduced surgical planning time and improved implant size/position and imaging feature estimation compared to conventional radiographic templating. Several components of data processing and model development and testing were insufficiently covered in the studies included in this scoping review.

CONCLUSIONS

AI-based 3D templating systems have the potential to improve preoperative planning for joint arthroplasty surgery. This technology offers more accurate and personalized preoperative planning, which has potential to improve functional outcomes for patients. However, deficiencies in several key areas, including data handling, model development, and testing, can potentially hinder the reproducibility and reliability of the methods proposed. As such, further research is needed to definitively evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of these systems.

The Value of Computed Tomography Scan in Three-dimensional Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a frequently performed procedure; the objective is restoration of native hip biomechanics and achieving functional range of motion (ROM) through precise positioning of the prosthetic components. Advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging and computed tomography (CT)-based navigation are valuable tools in both the preoperative planning and intraoperative execution. The aim of this study is to provide a thorough overview on the applications of CT scans in both the preoperative and intraoperative settings of primary THA. Preoperative planning using CT-based 3D imaging enables greater accuracy in prediction of implant sizes, leading to enhancement of surgical workflow with optimization of implant inventory. Surgeons can perform a more thorough assessment of posterior and anterior acetabular wall coverage, acetabular osteophytes, anatomical landmarks, and thus achieve more functional implant positioning. Intraoperative CT-based navigation can facilitate precise execution of the preoperative plan, to attain optimal positioning of the prosthetic components to avoid impingement. Medial reaming can be minimized preserving native bone stock, which can enable restoration of femoral, acetabular, and combined offsets. In addition, it is associated with greater accuracy in leg length adjustment, a critical factor in patients' postoperative satisfaction. Despite the higher costs and radiation exposure, which currently limits its widespread adoption, it offers many benefits, and the increasing interest in robotic surgery has facilitated its integration into routine practice. Conducting additional research on ultra-low-dose CT scans and examining the potential for translation of 3D imaging into improved clinical outcomes will be necessary to warrant its expanded application.

Medium-term outcomes of conventional versus short uncemented femoral stems for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years

BACKGROUND

Short stems are designed with a bone preservation philosophy in mind. This study aims to compare the outcomes/complications and survival of a collarless fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated conventional tapered stem and a HA-coated partial neck-retaining uncemented short stem in patients ⩽55 years old at medium-term follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 247 uncemented THAs operated between 2010 and 2014, comparing 146 patients treated with the fully HA-coated collarless stem (Group A) with 101 patients treated with a partial neck preserving, HA-coated short stem (Group B). 87 and 62 males were in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.11). The mean age of the series was 46 years (17-55) (p =0.16). The mean follow-up of groups A and B were 9.9 (7-12) years and 9.7 (7-12) years, respectively (p =0.21).

RESULTS

Mean Harris Hip Score improved from 55 to 92 in group A (p <0.001) and from 54 to 95 in group B (p <0.001), without differences between groups. Mean femoral neck length preservation in groups A and B was 13.6 (0-28) mm and 26 (11-38) mm, respectively (p =0.001). 13 (8.9%) and 1 (1%) patients in groups A and B presented postoperative complications, respectively (p =0.008). The conventional stem group had more aseptic loosening (Group A 3.4% vs. Group B 0%, p =0.06) along with more Symptomatic radiolucent lines (Group A 3.4% vs. Group B 0%, p =0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Both conventional and short stems showed excellent implant survival rates and functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.8 years. However, complications and radiolucent lines were more frequent with a collarless conventional-length stem. Bone preservation of the femoral neck and diaphysis may be preferred in active young patients.

Arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures is at risk for under restoration of lateral femoral offset

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to determine the restoration of hip biomechanics through lateral offset, leg length, and acetabular component position when comparing non-arthroplasty surgeons (NAS) to elective arthroplasty surgeons (EAS).

METHODS

131 patients, with a femoral neck fracture treated with a THA by 7 EAS and 20 NAS, were retrospectively reviewed. 2 blinded observers measured leg-length discrepancy, femoral offset, and acetabular component position. Multivariate logistic regression models examined the association between the surgeon groups and restoration of lateral femoral, acetabular offset, leg length discrepancy, acetabular anteversion, acetabular position, and component size, while adjusting for surgical approach and spinal pathology.

RESULTS

NAS under-restored 4.8 mm of lateral femoral offset (43.9 ± 8.7 mm) after THA when compared to the uninjured side (48.7 ± 7.1 mm, p = 0.044). NAS were at risk for under-restoring lateral femoral offset when compared to EAS (p = 0.040). There was no association between lateral acetabular offset, leg length, acetabular position, or component size and surgeon type.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral femoral offset is at risk for under-restoration after THA for femoral neck fractures, when performed by surgeons that do not regularly perform elective THA. This indicates that lateral femoral offset is an under-appreciated contributor to hip instability when performing THA for a femoral neck fracture. Lateral femoral offset deserves as much attention and awareness as acetabular component position since a secondary analysis of our data reveal that preoperative templating and intraoperative imaging did not prevent under-restoration.

Stem alignment with short tapered-wedge cementless stems affects bone mineral density continuously for at least 5 years after primary total hip arthroplasty

AIM

This study aimed to assess the relationship between the three-dimensional (3D) alignment of short tapered-wedge cementless stems and bone mineral density (BMD) changes in patients followed up for 5 years after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the hips of 52 patients who underwent THA using short tapered-wedge cementless stems at our institution from 2013 to 2016 with complete 5-year follow-up data. We evaluated the relationship between stem alignment, measured using a 3D-templating software, and BMD changes in the 7 Gruen zones.

RESULTS

After 1 year, significant negative correlations between varus insertion and a decrease in BMD in zone 7 and between flexed insertion and decreases in BMD in zones 3 and 4 were noted. After 5 years, significant negative correlations between varus insertion and a decrease in BMD in zone 7 and between flexed insertion and decreases in BMD zones 2, 3, and 4 were observed. With increased amounts of varus/flexion stem alignment, the amount of BMD loss decreased. There was no correlation between anteverted stem insertion and changes in BMD levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that stem alignment affects BMD based on 5-year follow-up data after surgery. Careful observation is necessary, especially when using short tapered-wedge cementless stems, as stem alignment may affect changes in BMD levels more than 5 years after surgery.

A Standardised Protocol for Pre-operative Pelvic Radiographs for Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Digital templating using pre-operative radiographs enables pre-operative planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA). This allows surgeons to reproduce hip biomechanics effectively, reducing the risk of post-operative complications. Pelvic radiographs demonstrating the head, neck, trochanters, and proximal one-third of the femoral shaft allow calculation of key measurements including femoral offset and limb length discrepancy (LLD). Currently, no standardised guideline exists for obtaining pre-operative radiographs for templating in THA.  Materials and methods: A single-blinded retrospective cohort study assessing the quality of pre- and post-operative radiographs of 195 patients who underwent elective THA for osteoarthritis over a two-year period was performed. Quality was rated as good, fair or poor, respectively, depending upon whether ≥2, 1 or none of the following were met: Pubic symphysis (PS) and coccyx in a straight line with 1-3 cm between the superior edge of the PS and tip of coccyx, trochanters distinguishable, obturator rings symmetric. Post-operative images were assessed to determine whether the distal end of the implanted prosthesis was visible.  Results: The sample consisted of 195 patients. Pre-operatively 115 (59%) radiographs were classified as good, 71 (36.4%) fair and 9 (4.6%) poor. Post-operatively 46 (23.6%) were classified as good, 114 (58.4%) as fair and 30 (15.4%) as poor. In the post-operative radiographs, 25.6% did not include the distal tip of the prosthesis.  Conclusion: This study highlights significant scope to improve the quality of pre-operative radiographs, allowing accurate templating to optimise outcomes for THA. A protocol is recommended whereby the pelvic radiograph is centred on the PS at the lesser trochanter level, ensuring adequate exposure of the proximal femur, acetabulum and iliac crests.

Optimising Soft-Tissue Balancing in Hip Hemiarthroplasty Surgery Using a Simple Planning Protocol

Introduction Intracapsular neck of the femur fractures are some of the most common fragility fractures with significant morbidity and mortality. Cemented hemiarthroplasty is the standard treatment in most cases. Restoring the horizontal offset and leg length is important to optimize the outcome of hip hemiarthroplasty. Preoperative templating based on a scaled radiograph is common prior to total hip arthroplasty surgery to achieve optimum offset and leg length. It is not routine to have scaled radiographs available prior to a hemiarthroplasty surgery. Our simple non-scaled radiograph templating protocol (NSRTP) was introduced to help establish the correct offset and leg length in the absence of scaled radiographs. Methods A retrospective, comparative, case-control study was carried out in an acute hospital setting. Scaled radiographs were not available for any patients in the study, as is usual for hemiarthroplasty patients in our hospital. One group had surgery without any templating. The other group had surgery using the NSRTP. The NSRTP determined optimal ipsilateral offset based on preoperative measurement of the contralateral hip offset and ipsilateral head diameter on unscaled radiographs together with intraoperative measurement of the diameter of the ipsilateral femoral head removed at surgery. To help achieve the correct length, the NSRTP also included assessment and restoration of the contralateral greater trochanter tip-to-head relationship. The neck cut was tailored to restore the correct relationship. Results Twenty-three patients underwent hemiarthroplasty surgery without any templating and 23 had surgery using the NSRTP. The implants used were C-STEM™ (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, Massachusetts, United States) and SPECTRON (Smith & Nephew plc, London, United Kingdom); stems were used together with monopolar heads. The stems were available in standard and high offset versions and with a variety of neck lengths, allowing the correct combination to be selected to restore offset. When the NSRTP was used, horizontal offset and leg length were restored to within 2 mm of the contralateral hip in 22 patients out of 23. There was a statistically significant improvement in restoration of offset and leg length when the NSRTP was used, compared to the control group. Conclusion Restoration of the offset and leg length is important to maximize the outcome of hip arthroplasty surgery. Preoperative templating is helpful to achieve offset and leg length in total hip replacement. In the absence of scaled radiographs, NSRTP enables restoration of offset and leg length to within 2 mm of normal in more than 96% of patients. This protocol requires knowledge of the offset of the hemiarthroplasty stems being used, which is easily available from the relevant manufacturer.

Fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty provides more accurate component positions in the supine position than in the lateral position

PURPOSE

The position of the acetabular and femoral components is critical for stability and wear resistance. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach in the supine position (S-DAA) is more helpful in improving the position of acetabular and femoral components than the fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach in the lateral decubitus position (L-DAA).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 76 cases of fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (38 cases in the S-DAA and 38 cases in the L-DAA group) was performed in one hospital from 2019 to 2021. The differences in inclination, anteversion, femoral offset (FO), global offset (GO), and leg length discrepancy (LLD) measurements during and after surgery were analyzed. The postoperative femoral offset (FO), global offset (GO), leg length discrepancy (LLD), and preoperative and postoperative Harris hip score were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the S-DAA group, there were no significant differences in the mean intraoperative inclination angle anteversion angle, FO, GO, and LLD compared to the postoperative values, whereas in the L-DAA group, there were significant differences between the intraoperative and postoperative measurements (P < 0.001, P = 0.009, P＜0.001, P＜0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). Additionally, there were significant differences in the accuracy of LLD, FO, and GO between the two groups (P < 0.001). Compared with the L-DAA group, the average differences of inclination, anteversion, LLD, FO, and GO during and after operation in the S-DAA group were smaller, and the consistency was higher. There was a significant difference in Harris hip score between the two groups at 1 week after surgery (P = 0.033). There was no significant difference in Harris hip score between 1 month and 3 months after surgery (P = 0.482 and P = 0.797, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the supine group, the direct anterior approach (DAA) provides more accurate positioning of the acetabular and femoral components. However, there was no significant difference in hip joint function and activity between the two groups at follow-up.

Proximal femur geometry: a major predictor of proximal femur fracture subtypes

INTRODUCTION

Proximal femur geometry (PFG) represents an important risk factor for the occurrence of hip fractures. There are currently few studies regarding the correlation between PFG and the occurrence of a specific fracture subtype, and those that exist have small cohorts and present with different methodologies and contradictory results. Therefore, there is no consensus in the literature regarding this topic. The present study aimed to establish the contribution of the PFG in the occurrence of different subtypes of proximal femur fractures (PFF): intertrochanteric, neck and subtrochanteric.

METHODS

Analysis of 1022 plain anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of patients consecutively admitted to the emergency room of a Level 1 Trauma Centre between 2013 and 2019 after low energy trauma who presented with PFF and underwent surgical treatment. Patients were analysed considering age, gender and subtype of PFF (intertrochanteric, neck or subtrochanteric). Radiological parameters including cervicodiaphyseal angle (CDA), horizontal offset (HO), femoral neck width (FNW), femoral neck length (FNL), great trochanter-pubic symphysis distance (GTPSD), acetabular teardrop distance (ATD) and width of the intertrochanteric region (WIR) were measured and compared between the different subtypes of fractures (7154 measurements). Statistical analysis was conducted recurring to absolute measurements and measurements ratios. The correlation was assessed using t-test.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in proximal femur geometry between the different subtypes of fractures. Patients presenting with femoral neck fractures had greater CDA (132.5 ± 6.9 vs. 130.0 ± 7.3; p < 0.001) and lower HO (45.8 ± 7.4 vs. 49.0 ± 8.0; p < 0.001), HO/ATD (0.34 ± 0.068 vs. 0.37 ± 0.072; p < 0.001) and HO/GTPSD (0.26 ± 0.049 vs. 0.28 ± 0.039; p < 0.001) than patients with intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

PFG represents an important contributor to the occurrence of different fracture subtypes. Femoral neck fractures are associated with greater CDA and lower HO, HO/ATD and HO/GTPSD when compared to intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures.

"Single-use peripheral" vs "conventional" reaming in total hip arthroplasty: how to respect native centre of rotation and acetabular offset? A CT study

PURPOSE

The respect of native hip offset represents a mainstay for satisfying results in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Historically, a great interest has been focused on restoration of femoral offset, while only in recent years, acetabular offset (AO) has been considered. The purpose of the current study was to compare the "single-use peripheral" reaming technique with the "conventional" one for the maintenance of the native COR of the hip and AO in patients undergoing to primary THA.

METHODS

Eighty patients affected from primary hip osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled in the study and were divided in two groups (Group A "single-use peripheral" and Group B "conventional" reaming technique). Pre- and post-operatively, AO, acetabular floor distance (AFd) and acetabular version (AV) were assessed through a CT scan. A comparison between groups for the radiological parameters, surgical time and complications was performed.

RESULTS

The demographic data were similar in both groups. The complications rate and the AV did not differ statistically between groups. Group A presented a statistically significant shorter surgical time and lower variation between pre- and post-operative AO and AFd. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

The "single-use peripheral" reaming technique demonstrated to be more reliable in reproducing the native COR and AO of patients undergoing to primary THA than the "conventional" one. The operative time was significantly reduced, and it may lead to a reduction in the infection risk even though it was not observed in the current study. Further research could be useful to validate such findings and to assess clinical impact and long-term survival of the implant.

Stem Design in Total Hip Arthroplasty Influences Ipsilateral Knee Valgus: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 2953 Cases

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) affects the biomechanics of the hip and the patient gait. The stem design influences femoral lever ratios and tissue trauma. Biomechanical changes such as these have the potential to induce knee arthritis. A varus or valgus configuration of knee arthritis is formed by asymmetric loadings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of stem design in THA on knee valgus by comparing a standard implant with an implant with a short stem.

METHODS

A total of 2953 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis between 2015 and 2021 were included in this retrospective data analysis. Patients were divided into three groups, depending on hip status (straight stem, short stem, and native joint). Leg alignment was distinguished as varus or valgus, and the degree of axial deviation was measured. Descriptive and explorative statistical analyses were performed, with a p value < 0.05 set as significant.

RESULTS

Ipsilateral knee valgus occurred significantly more often in patients with straight stems (57.2%) than in those with short stems (29%) and native joints (25.8%) (p < 0.001). Additionally, mean valgus deviation was significantly increased in patients with straight stems (8.9°) compared to those with short stems (6.4°) or native hip joints (6.7°). Both findings were accentuated in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous ipsilateral straight-stem THA is associated with knee valgus deformity, especially in women. Short-stem THA seems to be better suited to restoring physiological biomechanics and preventing the development of valgus osteoarthritis of the ipsilateral knee.

Digital measurement and clinical significance of proximal femur in the older people of Inner Mongolia population, China

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure the parameters of the proximal femur in the older people of Inner Mongolia, China and understand the influence of age and gender so as to provide guidance for the design and improvement of prosthesis for total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 236 patients who underwent CT angiography of lower limbs in the Department of Imaging, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University of China were collected. They were divided into 4 groups according to age: < 60 (group A), 60-69 (group B), 70-79 (group C), and > 80 years (group D). Four anatomical parameters, including femoral head diameter (FHD), femoral neck-shaft angle (FNSA), femoral offset (FO), femoral neck anteversion (FNA), were measured by Mimics 21.0. Comparisons were made between age groups of the same gender and between genders in the same age group to analyze the correlation of the 4 parameters of proximal femur with age and gender. In addition, the results of this study were compared with previous studies.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in FHD and FO between age groups, indicating no correlation with age. FNSA and FNA were no significantly different between group C and group D in the same gender, whereas there were significant differences between other age groups and were negatively correlated with age. There were significant differences in FHD and FO between genders in the same age group, with the males being larger than the females. FNSA and FNA were no significant differences between genders in the same age group.

CONCLUSIONS

FNSA and FNA decrease with age. FHD and FO were larger in males than in females in all age groups. Age and gender should be considered in the design of prosthesis.

Offset Acetabular Liners: Safer Than Previously Thought

High offset liners help to restore soft tissue tension after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, prior research has reported increased rates of aseptic loosening when using offset components. The purpose of this study was to examine the postoperative complication and revision rates of neutral vs offset acetabular liners at our institution. Two hundred eight primary THAs in 206 patients performed between 2016 and 2018 using neutral or offset liners were reviewed. All patients had a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (mean, 3.3 years; range, 2.0-5.7 years). Postoperative complications and revision surgeries were reviewed. All offset liners were 4 mm in thickness. Twelve (10.0%) complications occurred in the neutral liner group, and 13 (14.8%) complications occurred in the offset liner group. Two cases of aseptic loosening occurred in the neutral liner group, with no cases reported in the offset liner group. Nine cases (7.5%) in the neutral group required revision surgery, whereas 3 cases in the offset group required revision surgery. Chi-square analysis found no difference between the groups in the rate of postoperative complications, χ2 (1, N=208)=1.09 (P>.05), or the rate of revision, χ2 (1, N=208)=1.56 (P>.05). We found no significant differences between the neutral and offset groups regarding the rates of postoperative complications, aseptic loosening, or revision surgery. Our findings suggest that contemporary high offset liners, up to 4 mm, are safe and effective when attempting to restore native hip mechanics after THA. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):e298-e302.].

What is the Role of Stem Size and Offset in the Risk of Nonseptic Revision of the Exeter® 150-mm Stem? A Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND

The Exeter® stem is used worldwide, often in older patients, and it is the second most commonly used cemented stem design in Sweden. Previous studies have shown that for cemented stems with a composite beam, the smallest sizes result in an increased risk of revision for mechanical failure. However, little is known about whether the survivorship of the polished Exeter stem, which generally has been shown to be good, might be associated with design parameters such as stem dimensions or offset at extreme implant sizes.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

Are differences in (1) stem size or (2) offset of the standard Exeter V40 150-mm stem associated with differences in the risk of stem revision for aseptic loosening?

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2020, 47,161 Exeter stems were reported to the Swedish Arthroplasty Register, with very high coverage and completeness documented during the period studied. In this cohort, we included patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent surgery with a standard Exeter stem length of 150 mm and V40 cone with any type of cemented cups that had had at least 1000 reported insertions. This selection resulted in a study cohort representing 79% (37,619 of 47,161) of the total number of Exeter stems in the registry during that time. The primary study outcome was stem revision for aseptic indications such as loosening, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, and implant fracture. A Cox regression was performed, with adjustment for age, gender, surgical approach, year of surgery, use of highly crosslinked polyethylene cups, and femoral head size and length dictated by the shape of the head trunnion. Adjusted hazard ratios are presented with 95% confidence intervals. Two separate analyses were performed. The first analysis excluded stems with the highest offsets (50 mm and 56 mm, which were not available for stem size 0). The second analysis excluded stem size 0 to include all offsets. Because stem survival was not proportional over time, we divided the analyses into two insertion periods, 0 to 8 years and beyond 8 years.

RESULTS

Stem size 0 (compared to size 1) was associated with an increased risk of revision up to 8 years when all stem sizes were included (first analysis 0 to 8 years, HR 1.7 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.3]; p = 0.002). Forty-four percent (63 of 144) of revisions of size 0 stems were for periprosthetic fracture. There was no consistent association between stem size and risk of aseptic stem revision when size 0 was excluded in the second analysis beyond 8 years. The most common offset (44 mm) was associated with an increased risk of revision (compared with 37.5 mm) up to 8 years when all sizes were included (first analysis, HR 1.6 [95% CI 1.1 to 2.1]; p = 0.01). In the second analysis (beyond 8 years, all offsets included), offset of 44 mm was compared with offset of 37.5 mm; compared with the first period, this offset was associated with a reduced risk (HR 0.6 [95% CI 0.4 to 0.9]; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

We found overall high survival of the Exeter stem, with generally little or no influence of stem variations on the risk of aseptic revision. However, stem size 0 was associated with an increased risk of revision mainly for periprosthetic fractures. If the femoral anatomy offers a choice between sizes 0 and 1 in patients with poor bone quality who are at risk of periprosthetic fracture, our data speak in favor of choosing the larger stem if the surgeon believes it is safe to insert the larger size, or, if available, another stem design that has a documented lower risk of this complication. For patients with good cortical bone quality but very narrow canals, a cementless stem may also be a good alternative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

"Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty" - a retrospective radiological study

PURPOSE

Various anatomical landmarks have become established in radiography for the assessment of cup positioning after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The most important one is Koehler's teardrop figure (KTF). However, there is a lack of data on the validity of this landmark, which is widely used clinically for assessing the centre of rotation of the hip.

METHOD

A retrospective measurement of the lateral and cranial distance of the KTF to the centre of hip rotation was performed on the basis of 250 X-ray images of patients who had undergone THA. In addition, the dependence of these distances on pelvic tilt was determined in 16 patients by means of virtual X-ray projections based on pelvic CTs.

RESULTS

It was shown that the distance of the KTF from the centre of hip rotation in the horizontal plane is gender-dependent (men: 42.8 ± 6.0 mm vs. women: 37.4 ± 4.7 mm; p < 0.001) and age-dependent (Pearson correlation  - 0.114; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the vertical and horizontal distances are subject to variation depending on height (Pearson correlation 0.14; p < 0.05 and 0.40; p < 0.001, respectively) and weight (Pearson correlation 0.158; p < 0.05). The distance between the KTF and the centre of hip rotation varies slightly depending on pelvic tilt.

CONCLUSION

The KTF is not a sufficiently valid landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after THA. It is influenced by many different disturbance variables. However, it is largely robust against changes in pelvic tilt, so that it can be used as a reference point when comparing different intraindividual radiographs to assess the change in the centre of rotation due to implantation or to detect cup migration.

Contribution of the BioballTM head-neck adapter to the restoration of femoral offset in hip revision arthroplasty with retention of a well-fixed cup and stem

PURPOSE

Failure to restore the femoral offset of the native hip is a potential cause of dysfunctional hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to report our experience of using a modular head-neck adapter in revision THA, specifically analyzing its usefulness as a tool to correct a slightly diminished femoral offset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study including all hip revisions performed at our institution from January 2017 to March 2022 where the BioBallTM head-neck metal adapter was used. The preoperative and one year follow-up modified Merle d'Aubigné hip score was used to evaluate functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Of a total of 34 cases included for revision, the head-neck adapter system was used specifically in six patients (17.6%) to increase femoral offset, retaining both the acetabular and femoral components. In this subgroup of patients, mean offset decrease after primary THA was 6.6 mm (4.0-9.1), equivalent to a mean 16.3% femoral offset reduction. The median modified Merle d'Aubigné score went from 13.3 preoperatively to 16.2 at one year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The use of a head-neck adapter is a safe and reliable procedure that may allow the surgeon to easily correct a slightly diminished femoral offset in a dysfunctional THA without the need to revise well-fixed prosthetic components.

Hip offset and leg-length restoration in revision hip arthroplasty with a monoblock, hydroxyapatite-coated stem

AIMS

Restoration of normal hip biomechanics in arthroplasty surgery is important in order to achieve good muscle function and joint stability.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the postoperative radiographs of 131 femoral revision arthroplasty procedures using a monoblock, fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium stem. Femoral offset, modified-global offset and leg length were measured of the operated and contralateral hips.

RESULTS

Femoral offset was restored to ±10 mm in 108 cases (82%), modified-global offset was restored ±10 mm in 93 cases (71%) and leg length was restored to ±10 mm in 102 cases (81%). There were 4 dislocations with a mean follow-up period of 38 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of hip biomechanics is achievable with a monoblock stem and thus is a viable option in revision hip arthroplasty.

The Role of Global Femoral Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty with High Hip Center Technique

OBJECTIVE

The high hip center (HHC) technique has been proposed for the treatment of patients with developmental dysplaisa of the hip (DDH) who have an acetabular bone defect. However, the importance of global femoral offset (FO) in the application of this technique has not been sufficiently appreciated. Our goals were to confirm that the HHC technique is feasible in the treatment of patients with DDH and to assess the function of global FO in this procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty using high hip center technique for unilateral DDH at our hospital between January 2014 and June 2019. According to global FO, the patients were split into three groups: increased FO group (increment greater than 5 mm), restored FO group (restoration within 5 mm) and decreased FO group (reduction greater than 5 mm). Patients' medical records and plain radiographs were reviewed. One-way ANOVA was used to compare radiographic outcomes and Harris hip score (HHS). Paired t-test was used to assess preoperative and postoperative HHS and leg length discrepancy. Trochanteric pain syndrome, Trendelenburg sign and postoperative limp was evaluated with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 7.5 ± 1.4 years. The patients' HHS and leg length discrepancy were significantly improved (p < 0.05). In terms of vertical acetabular height, abductor arm, postoperative leg length difference, and acetabular cup inclination, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups. At the last follow-up, HHS was significantly higher in the restored FO group than in the decreased FO and increased FO groups. Trochanteric pain syndrome occurred in 15.0% and Trendelenburg sign and postoperative limp in 8.2% of all patients, respectively. Trochanteric pain syndrome, Trendelenburg sign and postoperative limp did not differ significantly across the three groups. One patient in increased FO group underwent revision for dislocation 6 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The HHC technique is an alternative technique for total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular bone abnormalities, according to the results of the mid-term follow-up. Also, controlling the correction of the global femoral offset to within 5 mm may lead to better clinical outcomes.

Correlation between Femoral Head Lateralization and Bone Morphology in Primary Hip Osteoarthritis

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common disease of the hip in adults, and its etiology is divided into two groups: primary and secondary. Although acetabular dysplasia is the most frequent reason for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Japan, primary OA has increased recently. Although there are two types of femoral head migration in primary OA: superior and medial, there are some patients with prominent femoral head lateralization. This study aimed at evaluating the relationship between femoral head lateralization and bone morphology of the acetabulum and proximal femur using radiographic factors in primary OA of the hip.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted between 2008 and 2017 to assess 1308 hips with OA who underwent primary THAs at our institute. The diagnostic criteria for primary OA were Crowe type 1, Sharp's angle <45°, and center-edge (CE) angle >25°. We classified patients with primary OA into two groups based on femoral head lateralization: group L with lateralization or group N without. Radiographic factors included Sharp's angle, CE angle, acetabular inclination, acetabular depth ratio (ADR), acetabular head index (AHI), and femoral neck-shaft angle (FNA), all examined on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. Femoral neck anteversion was calculated using computerized axial tomography.

Results

Primary OA was diagnosed in 210/1308 hips (16.1%) (group L: 112 hips (8.6%); group N: 98 (7.5%)). Patient demographics were not significantly different. Radiographic factors with observed significant differences between group L and group N were the average CE angle (33.0° vs. 35.1°, respectively, p = 0.009), ADR (251.6 vs. 273.4, p < 0.001), AHI (77.2 vs. 80.4, p < 0.001), and FNA (136.9° vs. 134.8°, p = 0.012).

Conclusions

This investigation suggests that primary OA with femoral head lateralization demonstrated specific identifiable radiographic characteristics in the acetabulum and proximal femur that might contribute to hip joint instability such as the dysplastic hip.

Combining the advantages of 3-D and 2-D templating of total hip arthroplasty using a new tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT of the hip with comparable radiation dose to conventional radiographs

BACKGROUND

Inaccurately scaled radiographs for total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating are a source of error not recognizable to the surgeon and may lead to inaccurate reconstruction and thus revision surgery or litigation. Planning based on computed tomography (CT) scans is more accurate but associated with higher radiation exposure. The aim of this study was (1) to retrospectively assess the scaling deviation of pelvic radiographs; (2) to prospectively assess the feasibility and the radiation dose of THA templating on radiograph-like images reconstructed from a tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT dataset.

METHODS

120 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed to assess the magnification error of our current THA templates. 27 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and a radiographic work-up in the supine position including a new tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT scan protocol was obtained. THA was templated on both images. Radiation dose was calculated.

RESULTS

Scaling deviations between preoperative radiographs and CT of ≥ 5% were seen in 25% of the 120 retrospectively analyzed patients. Between the two templates trochanter tip distance differed significantly (Δ2.4 mm, 0-7 mm, p = 0.035)), predicted femoral shaft size/cup size was the same in 45%/41%. The radiation dose of the CT (0.58 mSv, range 0.53-0.64) was remarkably low.

CONCLUSION

Scaling deviations of pelvic radiographs for templating THA may lead to planning errors of ≥ 3 mm in 25% and ≥ 6 mm in 2% of the patients. 2-D templating on radiograph-like images based on tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT eliminates this source of error without increased radiation dose.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective and prospective comparative study, Level III.

An Analysis of Radiographic Leg Length Discrepancy and Hip Offset in Patients at Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis

Background

Leg length and hip offset are important principles in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients may endorse leg length differences (LLD) postoperatively that may be anatomical or functional. The objective of this study was to determine the normal radiographic variation in leg length and hip offset in a preosteoarthritic population without a THA.

Methods

A retrospective study was completed using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a prospective longitudinal study. Patients at risk of developing or with early osteoarthritis without inflammatory arthritis or prior THA were included. Measurements were made from full limb length anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs. Multiple linear regression models were employed to predict side-to-side differences in LLD, Δ femoral offset (FO), Δ abductor muscle length (AML), Δ abductor lever arm, and Δ AP pelvic offset.

Results

The mean radiographic LLD was 4.6 mm, with 12 mm within 1 standard deviation. No significant differences were detected between LLD and sex, age, body mass index, or height. The median radiographic differences in FO, AML, abductor lever arm, and AP pelvic offset were 3.2 mm, 4.8 mm, 3.6 mm, and 3.3 mm, respectively. Height was predictive of Δ FO, while both height and age were predictive of Δ AML.

Conclusions

Radiographic leg length variations in a population without symptomatic or radiographic osteoarthritis exist. FO and AML are dependent on patient characteristics. Preoperative radiographic LLD is not predicted by age, gender, body mass index, or height. It should be stressed that anatomic reconstruction is one of the many goals of arthroplasty and can stand in conflict with the priority and primary goals of stability and fixation, which should be prioritized.

Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Femoral offset (FO) restoration plays an important role in improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients undergoing hip replacement. However, it is not given enough attention in revisions among patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs); instead, more attention is given to reduction, fixation of fractures and stabilizing prostheses. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of FO restoration on the function of the hip joint in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Moreover, we studied whether there is a difference in FO restoration between modular and nonmodular stems.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 20 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted modular titanium stem and 22 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted nonmodular titanium stem from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Based on the difference between the FO of the affected side and that of the healthy side, 26 patients were allocated into Group A (difference ≤ 4 mm), and 16 patients were allocated into Group B (difference > 4 mm). The postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), range of motion of the hip joint, length of both lower limbs and dislocation were compared between Group A and Group B. The proportions of patients with FO restoration (difference ≤ 4 mm) and stem subsidence were compared between the modular and nonmodular groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 34.3 ± 17.3 months, and all cases achieved fracture healing at the last visit. Patients in Group A had a higher HHS, larger range of abduction, fewer dislocations and less limb length discrepancy (LLD). Patients in the modular group had a higher proportion of FO restoration and less subsidence.

CONCLUSION

FO restoration improves postoperative hip joint function and reduces dislocation and LLD in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Compared with nonmodular prostheses, modular prostheses tend to be easier for FO restoration under complex circumstances.

The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) as a Standard Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) in Coxa Profunda and Protrusio Acetabuli? A Radiographic Analysis of 188 Cases

INTRODUCTION

The direct anterior approach (DAA) represents a well-recognized soft tissue sparing technique for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The feasibility and suitability of the DAA in cases of complex acetabular deformities, namely coxa profunda (CP) and protrusio acetabuli (PA), remain to be determined.

METHODS

A total of 188 cases of CP (100 cases) and PA (88 cases) hips undergoing primary THA via the DAA were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical and radiographic parameters were evaluated and potential complications were assessed. Finally, successful implantation was defined if surgical and radiographic parameters were well within established values of non-complex primary THA.

RESULTS

In 159 hips, the medial border of the acetabular component was transferred laterally to the ilioischial line, corresponding to a fully treated acetabular protrusion. In 23 (12.23%) cases, mild, and in 5 (2.66%) cases, moderate residual acetabular protrusion remained after THA. Postoperatively, 11.40% (PA group) and 9.00% (CP group) had a leg length discrepancy (LLD) greater than 10 mm. The mean operative time was significantly less than 60 min. A linear relationship between the BMI and operative time was observed, with an additional 0.9 min of operative time per BMI unit. Overall, complications were rare and did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the DAA is a suitable approach for primary THA in patients with coxa profunda and acetabular protrusion if performed by experienced surgeons familiar with the DAA. Obese patients with acetabular protrusion may pose a significant limitation to the DAA and caution should be advised in cases of obesity.

[Innovative image-based planning in musculoskeletal surgery]

BACKGROUND

For the preparation of surgical procedures in orthopedics and trauma surgery, precise knowledge of imaging and the three-dimensional imagination of the surgeon are of outstanding importance. Image-based, preoperative two-dimensional planning is the gold standard in arthroplasty today. In complex cases, further imaging such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging is also performed, generating a three-dimensional model of the body region and helping the surgeon in the planning of the surgical treatment. Four-dimensional, dynamic CT studies have also been reported and are available as a complementary tool.

DIGITAL AIDS

Furthermore, digital aids should generate an improved representation of the pathology to be treated and optimize the surgeon's imagination. The finite element method allows patient-specific and implant-specific parameters to be taken into account in preoperative surgical planning. Intraoperatively, relevant information can be provided by augmented reality without significantly influencing the surgical workflow.

Anatomical and Simulation Studies Based on Three-Dimensional-Computed Tomography Image Reconstruction of Femoral Offset

Although the hip joint morphology varies by race, few studies have investigated the associations between two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) morphologies. This study aimed to use computed tomography simulation data and radiographic (2D) data to clarify the 3D length of offset, 3D changes in the hip center of rotation, and femoral offset as well as investigate the anatomical parameters associated with the 3D length and changes. Sixty-six Japanese patients with a normal femoral head shape on the contralateral side were selected. In addition to radiographic femoral, acetabular, and global offsets, 3D femoral and cup offsets were investigated using commercial software. Our findings revealed that the mean 3D femoral and cup offsets were 40.0 mm and 45.5 mm, respectively; both were distributed around the mean values. The difference between the 3D femoral and cup offsets (i.e., 5 mm) was associated with the 2D acetabular offset. The 3D femoral offset was associated with the body length. In conclusion, these findings can be applied to the design of better ethnic-specific stem designs and can help physicians achieve more accurate preoperative diagnoses.

Total hip arthroplasty in hereditary multiple exostosis patients: literature review and evaluation of 10 cases

BACKGROUND

Acquired hip deformities in patients affected by hereditary multiple exostosis (HME) may incur in early hip osteoarthritis and functional limitation requiring primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Characteristic coxo-femoral joint dysmorphisms in HME may pose a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Here we report our experience in a series of patients with HME treated in our hospital with THA.

METHODS

With a mean follow-up of 5 years, 10 primary THAs were reviewed; proximal femur deformities, acetabular dysplasia and joint osteoarthritis has been assessed through x-rays and CT-scan evaluation. In all cases hemispheric press-fit cups were used; 4 stem had metaphyseal engagement, 5 had proximal diaphyseal engagement and 1, with anatomical geometry, had metaphyseal fixation. 2 cases required stem cementation, 3 modular neck and 1 lateralised. The clinical data, complications and clinical outcomes, were recorded and analysed.

RESULTS

The mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) increased from 34 preoperative to 86 postoperative; preoperative mean neck shaft angle (NSA) was 150°, head/neck ratio 0.6, offset 31 mm; Wiberg angle 28°, Sharp angle 38°, 1 patient had subluxation grade 4 according to Crowe, 8 hips showed osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade ⩾2 ); 5 femurs were classified as Dorr type C, 2 as type B and 3 as type A. Perioperative complications were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary THA in HME significantly improved clinical and functional outcomes. Press-fit cup fixation together with metaphyseal and proximal diaphyseal stem engagement on reliable bone quality femur, represents a valid option in HME patients with normal acetabular morphology, wide broaden neck and valgus NSA.

The torsion of the proximal femur in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a 3-dimensional evaluation

INTRODUCTION

The anatomy of the proximal femur at the time of total hip arthroplasty has been widely studied but the horizontal plane was never considered, or only limited to the torsion of the femoral neck.

METHODS

Using CT-scan images from a group of 178 patients scheduled for cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), we analysed the evolution of the torsion of the proximal femoral metaphysis, in reference to the posterior bicondylar plane of the femur. The evolution of the torsion, between 20 mm below the centre of the lesser trochanter and 20 mm above, was evaluated.

RESULTS

In cases of primary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and epiphysiolysis capitis femoris, the mean torsion decreased from 46° to 20° without significant differences in average values between the different diagnoses, but important individual variations were found. In the groups of dysplasia and congenital hip dislocation, the torsion values were significantly higher, decreasing in mean from 59° to 25° and 63° to 34° respectively, and with important individual variations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data are important when using cementless femoral stems, since an ideal fit-and-fill in the proximal femur zone has been shown to positively influence bone ingrowth of the stem. However, a strict adaptation of the stem to the medullary canal, without considering its torsion, can lead to an increased or decreased torsion of the prosthesis neck and thus to an instability of the arthroplasty. For these reasons, if a perfect adaptation of the stem to the intramedullary anatomy and an optimal reconstruction of the extramedullary anatomy are to be achieved, 3-dimensional planning should ideally be obtained for every patient. This will allow the best stem choice adapted to every single patient and every kind of anatomy.

How to perform correct templating in total hip replacement

Templating plays a key role in surgery that is often underestimated. There is a difference between planning and templating: in the first not only the hip is considered but involves the evaluation of the patient in its entirety. Templating instead consists of calculating the position of the implant in order to place it in the best possible position. Fundamental is a correct X-ray of the pelvis, which must follow certain standards. For traditional templating, drawings on appropriately enlarged transparent implants were provided by the prosthesis manufacturer. The implementation of digital software into clinical practice has improved the accuracy and reproducibility of templating, which in most surgical units is performed by standard 2D radiographic images. Thanks to digital preoperative templating in a digital radiology environment, the hip reconstructive surgeon can perform preoperative planning and implant sizing quickly, consistently, and affordably. Currently, 3D templating can also be performed by software used initially to create personalized stems for THA. Aim of the current review is to outline the essentials of correct templating in THA performance, and to report the updates since the introduction of digital and 3D technologies in this setting.

Preoperative radiographs to predict component malposition in direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

There is conflicting evidence as to whether or not patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) have increased risk of component malposition. The aim of this study was to investigate whether specific preoperative radiographic features were predictive of postoperative component malposition in DAA THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined 204 THA operations performed for osteoarthritis via the DAA at a single institution. Preoperative radiographs were analysed with numerous pre-specified measurements and classifications being recorded. Postoperative radiographs were analysed to determine if any of these preoperative radiographic factors correlated with component malposition in regard to cup inclination, cup version, femoral stem coronal alignment, leg-length discrepancy (LLD) and femoral offset discrepancy.

RESULTS

Numerous preoperative factors were associated with component malposition. Coxa profunda was found to be a significant predictor of cup anteversion being outside of the target range (p = 0.0089) and an increased centre-edge angle was a significant predictor for a postoperative LLD (p = 0.0134). A decreased neck-shaft angle (p = 0.0007) and a lower preoperative LLD (p = 0.0019) were both predictive of femoral stem coronal malalignment.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative radiographs can be a valuable tool for surgeons in predicting patients at risk of component malposition in DAA THA.

Hip joint function and reconstruction of the anterior femoral offset in patients with short stem vs. conventional THA

In cases where mobility and joint function are impaired after implantation of a THA, weakening of hip movement in both extension/flexion and adduction/abduction may play a role due to shortening of the physiological lever arm of the hip muscles. Mechanical factors of influence include the lateral femoral offset, which affects the lever arm, and the antetorsion angle of the hip prosthesis, which affects the anterior femoral offset. This study aimed to investigate the effect of an altered antetorsion angle of the implant on the hip moments and gait patterns of the patient. For this study, 13 patients with a conventional stem on one side and a calcar-guided short stem implanted on the contralateral side were included. To determine the maximum hip moment, tests were performed on a dynamometer in extension/flexion and adduction/abduction in addition to gait analysis. As a control, a comparison was made with data from a reference group of 30 healthy subjects. Both implants showed similar symmetry indices. There was a significant difference between the implants for adduction moments (p < 0.001). The ratios between the directions of moments showed no significant differences. The joint function measured by isokinetic measurements and gait analysis remains comparable to the healthy control group after short stem arthroplasty, but shows slight changes after conventional stem arthroplasty.

Reduction in Offset Is Associated With Worse Functional Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Conflicting reports exist about the effect of offset variation on functional outcomes following total hip arthroplasty. Reproducing native hip offset is thought to optimize function by restoring biomechanics and appropriately tensioning the hip abductor muscles. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of failing to restore global hip offset in comparison to the native contralateral hip.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospective patient cohort was performed on patients undergoing an elective primary total hip arthroplasty. A total of 414 patients who had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were included. Postoperative plain radiographs were analyzed for offset and compared to the contralateral native hip. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Regression analyses indicated that a reduction in offset of >20 mm resulted in worse WOMAC pain (P = .005) and motion (P = .015) scores compared to those with maintained offset. WOMAC function (P = .063), global (P = .025), and VR-12 scores were not affected (physical P = .656; mental P = .815). Reduction in offset up to 20 mm and increased offset were not significantly associated with patient-reported outcome measures (P-values ranged from .102 to .995).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated an association between reduction in offset by >20 mm and worse WOMAC pain and motion scores following total hip arthroplasty. Surgeons should avoid decreases in offset >20 mm in order to optimize functional outcomes.

Survival and radioclinical evaluation of the Optimys™ short stem at more than 6years' mean follow-up: A retrospective study of 108 cases

INTRODUCTION

The short stems developed in recent years offer an interesting alternative to standard long stems. The Optimys™ short stem has been widely studied, but not according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria. We therefore conducted a retrospective study of Optimys™ at a minimum 5years' follow-up, to assess: (1) survival on NICE criteria, (2) complications, (3) functional results, and (4) subsidence, restoration of offset and bone remodeling.

HYPOTHESIS

Optimys™ shows survival comparable to that of other non-cemented standard and short stems, with a<0.5% per year revision rate or<2.5% at 5years on NICE criteria.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study included 108 Optimys™ stems at a mean 76.5months' follow-up (range: 60-112months). Clinical [Harris, Oxford-12 and forgotten hip (French version: SHO-12) scores] and radiologic data were collected pre- and postoperatively. Analysis focused on implant survival, complications, functional results and radiological results (restoration of offset, bone remodeling, subsidence and osseointegration) and risk factors for stem migration.

RESULTS

At a mean 76.5months' follow-up (range: 60-112months), Optimys™ survival was 97.7% (95% CI: 0.945-1). Oxford and Harris scores improved significantly: respectively, 16.1 vs. 44.7 [Δ=28.598; 95% CI: 27.410-29.785 (p<0.001)] and 45.3 vs. 95 [Δ=49.662; 95% CI: 47.442-51.882 (p<0.001)]. Mean forgotten hip score (SHO-12) at last follow-up was 82.7±19.6 (range: 35.4-100.0). There was 1 case of aseptic revision at 11months for femoral osseointegration defect. Mean subsidence was 1.64mm (range: 0-20.63mm); no predisposing factors could be identified. Femoral offset increased by a mean 2.41±4.53mm (range: -10.10 to 14.70mm).

CONCLUSION

The present study reports good survival for the Optimys™ stem, which meets NICE criteria. Radiologic and clinical results were encouraging, with a low rate of subsidence, comparable to other series, but with increased femoral offset.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort study.

The association of postoperative global femoral offset with total hip arthroplasty outcomes

Global femoral offset (GFO) and femoral offset (FO) reportedly affect outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, FO assessed using plain radiography is affected by internal and external rotations of the hip joint. We investigated the relationship between leg length discrepancy and Harris hip score (HHS), and their influence on acetabular offset (AO), FO, GFO, anterior femoral offset, and outcomes after THA. We retrospectively evaluated 140 patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA. A three-dimensional (3D) pelvis and femur model created from computed tomography (data using ZedHip software was used to investigate these parameters. The modified (m)HHS scores were significantly improved from 49.0 to 88.8 in total mHHS, 20.0-44.5 in pain, and 28.9-44.4 points in function. Significant correlations were found between the differences in AO, FO, GFO, and pain score in binominal, with maximum values of - 1.24, + 1.54, and + 0.90 mm/100 cm body height, respectively. The maximum value of GFO and mHHS in binominal was + 1.17 mm/100 cm body height (BH). The optimal range of difference of GFO was - 1.75 to 4.09 mm/100 cm BH. This is the first report using a 3D method for assessing FO. Preoperative planning using the system could improve postoperative function.

Clinical Outcomes for Total Hip Arthroplasty with and without Previous Curved Periacetabular Osteotomy

There are currently no reports on the clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with previous curved periacetabular osteotomy (CPO), although the outcomes after THA with non-CPO types of periacetabular osteotomy have been reported. This study aimed to clarify the differences in clinical outcomes and radiographic features after THA with or without previous CPO. We performed a retrospective case-control with individual matching study. The participants were 10 patients with 11 hips that underwent cementless THA between October 1998 and October 2018 with previous CPO (osteotomy group). For the control group, we matched age, sex, and follow-up period, and included 32 patients with 33 hips that underwent cementless THA without previous CPO at a 1:3 ratio. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), cup size, position, and alignment, global offset (GO), operative time, perioperative blood loss, frequency of osteophyte removal, and major complications were compared between the two groups. The osteotomy group had no cases with revision surgery and dislocation. No significant differences were found between the two groups as follows: mean HHS, 94.9 points in the osteotomy group versus 92.7 points in the control group at the final follow-up; mean GO, 70.1 mm in the osteotomy group versus 71.4 mm in the control group; cup size, position, and alignment after THA; operative time; and perioperative blood loss. The frequency of osteophyte removal was higher in the osteotomy group. The take-home messages were that the clinical outcomes, including HHS, and radiographic features, including GO, after THA were equivalent in the two groups.

How to analyze postoperative radiographs after total hip replacement

Total hip replacement is one of the most widely performed surgeries. It is stated as the most efficient method of treating end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip joint. What is more, it significantly improves the quality of patients' lives, relieves them from pain and restores decreased range of motion, provided that is conducted properly. Aim of this article is to indicate which constituents of prosthetic placement can be easily measured on postoperative radiographs and point out how to interpret obtained results. Multiple mechanical factors, such as center of rotation, femoral offset, acetabular offset, acetabular inclination, acetabular anteversion and leg length discrepancy can be measured on postoperative radiographs. To provide a successful surgery and to acquire both radiological and clinical satisfying results, proper prosthetic placement is crucial. Malpositioning of each element, in varying degrees may lead to dislocation or reoperation.

Radiologic restoration inaccuracy increases postoperative dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study with propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Dislocation is a complicated process and associated with multivariate etiology and risk factors. The purpose of this study was to verify if radiologic restoration inaccuracy increases postoperative dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) individually or synergistically.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2020, we identified 76 (1.9%) patients who suffered postoperative dislocations from 3926 THAs in our institution. After excluded patients with previously proven patient-related and implant-related risk factors, the remaining patients were used to match a 1:1 control patients who were without dislocation. The cup position (inclination and anteversion angles), hip offset (HO), leg length discrepancy (LLD), and abductor lever arm (ALA) were analyzed by univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Measurements on radiographs showed excellent interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.922-0.952) and intraobserver agreements (ICC 0.933-0.967). HO restoration inaccuracy (without ± 5 mm) was associated with higher dislocation risk (OR 4.241 95% CI 1.440-12.492, P = 0.009). The restoration inaccuracy of the cup position, LLD, or ALA could not increase the dislocation risk individually. When combining the radiologic restoration inaccuracy factors, the HO + LLD restoration inaccuracy and HO + ALA restoration inaccuracy increased the odds of postoperative dislocation (OR 12.056, 95% CI 1.409-103.127, P = 0.023; OR 4.770, 95% CI 1.336-17.028, P = 0.016, respectively). Combining the four risk factors of cup safe zone, HO, LLD, and ALA, patients with 3 or 4 radiologic restoration inaccuracy factors showed a higher risk of dislocation (OR 13.500, 95% CI 1.340-135.983, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Hip offset (HO) restoration inaccuracy increased the risk of dislocation following primary THA. Multivariate radiologic restoration accuracy is critical for the prevention of dislocation and needs to be valued by surgeons.

Utilizing Three-Dimensional Head-Lesser Trochanter Distance Could Further Reduce Leg Length Inequality in Primary Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT)-based head-lesser trochanter distance (HLD) could reduce leg length discrepancy (LLD) more than the use of a two-dimensional (2-D) plain film method in primary bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Methods: Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to adjust the confounding factors. A retrospective comparative analysis of 128 patients was performed. In the control group, the leg length was equalized using the 2-D, plain film-based HLD. In the study group, primary bipolar hemiarthroplasty was performed using the 3-D CT-based HLD method. Postoperative LLDs were compared between the two groups using the method of Ranawat. In addition, the Harris hip score (HHS) was evaluated and compared at one year after surgery. Results: A significant difference was observed in mean postoperative LLD between the 2-D HLD group and the 3-D CT HLD group: 1.6 ± 1.2 mm (range, 0.1−6.0 mm) and 1.1 ± 1.2 mm (range, 0.1−5.1 mm), respectively (p < 0.05). Additionally, a higher percentage of patients in the 3-D CT HLD group had an LLD of less than 2 mm. The mean HHS at one year after surgery showed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: To minimize the occurrence of LLD, HLD measurement from a CT scanner may be more accurate than an X-ray. The 2-D and 3-D HLD differences in the 3-D CT HLD group were statistically significant. Using a 3-D, CT-based HLD method might decrease the possibility of an LLD over 2 mm.