Is transverse acetabular ligament an anatomical landmark to reliably orient the cup in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Relation of native acetabular anteversion to the orientation of transverse acetabular ligament

BACKGROUND

Precise positioning of the acetabular component during total hip replacement is the key to achieving optimal implant function and ensuring long-term patient comfort. However, different anatomical variations, degenerative changes, dysplasia, and other diseases make it difficult. In this study, we discuss a method based on the three-dimensional direction of the transverse ligament, predicting native acetabular anteversion with higher accuracy.

METHODS

Angular positions of the acetabulum and direction of the transverse ligament were automatically calculated from routine computed tomography data of 270 patients using a registration algorithm. The relationship between acetabular angles and ligament direction and their relationship with sex, age, and pelvic tilt were sought. These relationships were then modelled using multilinear regression.

RESULTS

Including the direction of the transverse ligament in the sagittal and transverse planes as a regressor in the multilinear model explained the variation in acetabular anteversion (R2 = 0.76 for men, R2 = 0.63 for women; standard deviation in prediction: men, 3.92° and women, 4.00°).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the ligament was suitable as a guidance structure almost insensitive to the ligament in the sagittal and transverse planes must be considered. Estimation based on the direction in only 1 plane was not sufficiently accurate. The operative acetabular inclination was not correlated with the direction of the ligament. The correlations were higher in men than in women.

Digital protractor as an intraoperative guide to cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

To explore if digital protractor could guide the anteversion of acetabular cup during primary THA and make it consistent with preoperative.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 172 cases of primary THA with direct anterior approach (DAA) over 2 years. The anteversion of acetabular cup were measured from computed tomography (CT) scan preoperative and de-identified plain radiographs postoperative by two blinded investigators who were not involved in the surgery. The effect of the digital protractor on the anteversion was determined using regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean anteversion for the THAs in digital protractor group was 15.5°and 21.4°in control group (P < 0.01). The mean anteversion bias for the THAs in digital protractor group was 1.59° and 6.63° in control group (P < 0.01).Regression analysis identified a 10.7% difference in anteversion due to the use of digital protractor (P < 0.01), and THAs performed without digital protractor were six times more likely to result in anteversion of > 25°. The correlation coefficient for the interobserver reliability of the measurement of the two investigators was 0.94.

CONCLUSION

The digital protractor is a practical tool in the DAA for THA to determine the anteversion of the acetabular prosthesis.

Determining the orientation of acetabular prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty by refering to the anatomical landmarker of acetabular notches

The aim of this study was to explore a novel method to determine the orientation of acetabular prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty (THA) by refering to the anatomical landmarker of acetabular notches. Forty-one normal developmental hips were included in the present study. The acetabulums were reamed according to standard surgical procedures of THA on life-size 3D printing pelvis models. The inferior edge of acetabular cup were placed (1-5) mm proximal and distal to the proximal line of the anterior and posterior acetabular notches (PLAPAN) respectively to determine cup inclination. The inferior edge of acetabular cup were placed (1-5) mm pronating and supinating around the proximal point of acetabular posterior notch (PPAPN) respectively to determine cup anteversion. The pelvis plain radiographs were took and the inclination and anteversion of the acetabular cup at 22 positions were calculated. In the normal developmental hip, the mean inclination of acetabular prothesis were (35.10 ± 3.22)° and (45.90 ± 2.68)° when the inferior edge of the acetabular cup was 3 mm proximal and 1 mm distal to the PLAPAN. The optimal cup inclination could be obtained when the inferior edge of the acetabular cup was 1 mm proximal to the PLAPAN (the mean inclination was (40.71 ± 2.80)°). The mean anteversion of acetabular prothesis were (10.67 ± 4.55)° and (20.86 ± 4.44)° when the inferior edge of the acetabular cup was 1 mm pronating and 1 mm supinating around the PPAPN. The optimal cup anteversion could be obtained when the inferior edge of the acetabular cup was parallel to the PLAPAN (the mean anteversion was (18.00 ± 1.64)°). The inclination and anteversion of acetabular prosthesis could be determined by refering the anatomical landmarks of acetabular notches, which could help orthopedists to install the acetabular prosthesis quickly and safely in THA.

Application of transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the correct position of the acetabular component directly determines the outcome of the surgery, or the success of the surgery. Therefore, how to accurately locate the position of the acetabular component has become a very critical step in THA. As an important anatomical structure of the hip joint, the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is helpful for acetabular component orientation in THA. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate application of TAL in THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search of PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed (January and February 2023) using keywords "total hip arthroplasty," "total hip replacement," "total hip replacements," "total hip arthroplasties," "total hip prosthesis," and "transverse acetabular ligament" in all possible combinations. Reference lists of included articles were reviewed. Study design, surgical approach, patient demographics, TAL identification rate, appearance of the TAL, anteversion and inclination angle and rate of dislocations were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 19 studies met the screening criteria. Study designs were prospective cohorts (42%), retrospective cohorts (32%), Case series (21%), and randomized controlled trial (5%). Twelve of the 19 (63.2%) studies investigated the application of TAL as an anatomical landmark for locating acetabular component position in THA. Analysis revealed that TAL is a reliable anatomical landmark for acetabular component orientation within the safe zone in THA.

CONCLUSIONS

TAL can reliably be used to align the acetabular component in the safe zone for anteversion and inclination in THA. However, TAL has individual variation influenced by some risk factors. More randomized controlled studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to investigate the precision and accuracy of TAL as an intraoperative landmark in THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Combined kinematic cup alignment reduces the rate of impingement and edge loading compared to mechanical and anatomical alignment. An in-vitro case-control study

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, different alignments have been described for acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA), to reduce the risk of impingement and edge loading. Currently there are 3 main options: mechanical (40° inclination/15° anteversion relative to the anterior pelvic plane), anatomic (40° inclination/anteversion parallel to the transverse ligament) and combined kinematic (according to spinal-pelvic parameters). There are no studies comparing all three in terms of impingement and edge loading. We therefore performed a retrospective case-control in-vitro study comparing risk of impingement and edge loading between the three alignments.

HYPOTHESIS

The study hypothesis was that combined kinematic alignment incurs significantly less risk of impingement and edge loading than do the other two types of alignment.

METHODS

Using a THA planning system, we simulated the 3 alignments for 90 patients undergoing THA with a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing between November 2019 and January 2022; for each simulation, we recorded any prosthetic impingement or edge loading. The study endpoint was the rate of prosthetic impingement or edge loading between the 3 alignments.

RESULTS

With the mechanical alignment, 31% of patients (28/90) showed risk of impingement and 22% (20/90) risk of edge loading. With the anatomic alignment, 31% of patients (28/90) showed risk of impingement and 23.3% (21/90) risk of edge loading. With the combined kinematic alignment, 12.2% of patients (11/90) showed risk of impingement and 8.9% (8/90) risk of edge loading. Pairwise comparison showed that the combined kinematic alignment was associated with significantly less impingement and edge loading than the mechanical alignment (respectively, p=0.03 and p=0.022) or the anatomic alignment (respectively, p=0.03 and p=0.014), while the mechanical and anatomic alignments did not differ.

CONCLUSION

A combined kinematic cup alignment in THA significantly reduced the risk of impingement and edge loading compared to mechanical and anatomic alignments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective case-control study.

The influence of sagittal pelvic malrotation on transverse acetabular ligament guided cup orientation: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) candidates frequently present pelvic malrotation. The aim of this study is to analyze how pelvic malrotation influence transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) guided cup orientation and investigate whether pelvic malrotation produce different clinical outcomes after THA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of THA patients (144 hips) who use TAL as a guidance for cup positioning from March 2017 to January 2020. The patients were divided into normal pelvis (NP) group and backward pelvis (BP) group by sagittal pelvic malrotation assessed by APPA, the angle between the vertical and the APP on standing lateral pelvic radiographs preoperatively. Cup anteversion and inclination and that out of the safe zones were measured and compared in two groups. The demographic data, clinical results, and complications of patients were also compared.

Results

Backward pelvic malrotation were found in 60.6 % of this cohort of THA candidates. The mean angle of both inclination and anteversion in BP group were significantly larger than that in NP group. The rate of cup for anteversion and inclination above the safe zone in BP group was significantly larger than that in NP group. There were 4 patients in BP group recording anterior hip dislocation after surgery. Other complications were not observed at last follow-up.

Conclusions

Backward pelvis malrotation may increase TAL guided cup inclination and anteversion, which were inclined to became outlier above the safe zone. This likely increase the rates of dislocation after THA. For the patients with pelvis malrotation, cup positioning should be performed individually instead of guided by TAL.

Is a portable accelerometer-based navigation system useful in total hip arthroplasty?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Precise implant alignment is a crucial prognostic factor for successful outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A portable accelerometer-based navigation (PN) device may achieve the same accuracy as that achieved by the computer-assisted navigation surgery technique, with the convenience of a conventional technique. Although the usefulness of PN in THA (PN-THA) has been reported, whether it is more accurate than performing THA with a conventional technique (CON-THA) remains controversial. The difference in surgical time between PN-THA and CON-THA is also unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing results of PN-THA with those of CON-THA. We focused on the following question: is PN-THA superior to CON-THA in terms of radiological parameters and surgical time?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify studies that met the following inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trials (RCT) or non-RCT, studies involving patients who underwent PN-THA and patients who underwent CON-THA, studies including data on radiological parameters and surgical outcomes. Author names, publication year, country, study design, surgical approach, demographic characteristics of the participants (diagnosis, gender, age, and body mass index), and surgical outcomes (the radiological parameters and the surgical time) were extracted. We calculated the mean differences (MDs) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. p<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Three studies were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that absolute deviation of the postoperative measured angles from the target position for the cup anteversion was significantly smaller in PN-THA than in CON-THA (MD=-1.70, 95% CI=-2.91 to -0.50, [p=0.005]). There was no significant difference in the absolute deviation of the postoperative measured angles from the target position for cup abduction between the groups (MD=-1.82, 95% CI=-4.32-0.67, [p=0.15]). The surgical time was significantly longer in PN-THA than in CON-THA (MD=8.58, 95% CI=4.05-13.10, [p=0.0002]).

DISCUSSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the results of PN-THA with those of CON-THA showed that the PN-THA is advantageous for precise cup implantation compared to CON-THA, although PN-THA has a longer surgical time compared to CON-THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted

BACKGROUND

Optimal acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a necessity in achieving a stable implant. Although there has been considerable debate in the literature concerning the safe zone, to date, there has not been any review to determine if these references are consistent with the definition applied by Lewinnek et al. in 1978. Therefore, this article aims to examine the available literature in the PubMed database to determine how often a correct reference to the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek was applied to discussions regarding THA.

METHODS

A search for literature in the PubMed database was performed for articles from 1978 to 2019. Search criteria included terms 'Lewinnek,' 'safe zone,' and 'total hip arthroplasty.' Exclusions included abstract-only articles, non-English articles, articles unrelated to THA, and those lacking full content.

RESULTS

A review of literature yielded 147 articles for inclusion. Overall, only 11% (17) cited the Lewinnek article correctly. Forty-five percent (66) of articles referenced measurements in the supine position, 18% (26) referenced other positions, and 37% (55) did not specify. Nineteen percent (28) reported measurements of the acetabular cup orthogonal to the anterior pelvic plane, while 73% (108) did not, and 7% (11) did not specify. Twenty-three percent (34) measured from computed tomography scans instead of other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In the discussion of the safe zone regarding THA, only 11% of articles listed are consistent with the definition established by Lewinnek. This warrants further investigation into a consistent application of the term and its implications for THA implant stability and dislocation rates.

Validation of use of transverse acetabular ligament and mechanical angle guide device to orient the acetabular cup

AIM

To verify if transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) can be used as an anatomical landmark to reliably orient the cup in primary total hip arthroplasty and compare it to acetabular cups placed with the help of mechanical angle guide (MAG) device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty Five patients with primary total hip arthroplasty, all performed by the same surgeon were included in the study. All patients had undergone surgery by anterolateral approach and all were cementless total hip arthroplasty. TAL was used as a reference guide for positioning of the cup in one group while MAG device was used in the other. Post operatively CT was done to confirm the version and inclination of the acetabular cup and the femoral stem version. SPSS was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

18 males and 17 females were included. The most common etiological cause for THR was secondary osteoarthritis due to AVN (40%). At 18 months follow up, there was just 1 case of dislocation in group in which angle guide device was used. The mean anteversion of the acetabular cup on CT findings was 23.82° by using TAL while 18.35° with help of MAG device (P < 0.05). All were within Leweniks safe zone.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAL and MAG device both can be effectively used to align the acetabulum component. TAL is patient specific intraoperative landmark which is not affected by patient positioning while angle guide device can give false positive assessment of cup version.

Modern cup alignment techniques in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

A systematic review was conducted to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of the alternative surgical techniques that consider the dynamic aspect of the acetabular orientation when aligning a cup (pelvic tilt-, lumbo-pelvic kinematics-, and spine-hip relationship-adjusted cup alignment techniques).

METHOD

Eight eligible articles reported the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed with alternative techniques. Clinical and radiological data were extracted. One study had a control group of patients who underwent conventional THAs (level III) while the seven other studies were level IV. Computer navigation system (CAS), Optimized Positioning System (OPS™), and manual instrumentation were used to align components in four, two, and two studies, respectively. A meta-analysis was not carried out because there was a lack of homogeneity between included articles regarding the method to position the cup and the nature of the reported data.

RESULTS

THA performed with alternative techniques had an early dislocation rate ranging from 0 to 1.9%, no unexpected catastrophic failure, and acceptable radiographic cup orientations. One study compared kinematically and mechanically aligned THAs and found no dislocation in either groups, similar patient reported outcome measures (43 Oxford-12 Score for both groups), and similar proportions of cup in the Lewinnek zone (respectively 65% and 70%).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Alternative methods accounting for the functional acetabular orientation seem to be clinically safe and effective in the early-term, and generate acceptable cup orientation on radiographs. Their values compare to those of more conventional techniques for cup implantation remain to be determined. We developed a classification of the multiple methods for aligning an acetabular component.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Kinematic alignment versus conventional techniques for total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective case control study

BACKGROUND

Residual complications of conventionally implanted hip components have only been partially reduced by improved implant design and higher surgical precision, and their occurrence is poorly predicted by the radiographic standing/supine cup orientation. This has raised awareness that conventional techniques may not aim for the correct component orientation target, and the lumbo-pelvic kinematics, which influences the functional acetabular orientation, may be of interest to further improve THA clinical outcomes. This has led to the development of the Lumbo-Pelvic kinematic alignment (KA) technique for THA that aims to anatomically position and kinematically align hip implants (acetabular and femoral, total and resurfacing components), in order to optimise prosthetic hip biomechanics and hopefully improve prosthetic function, patient satisfaction, and components' lifespan. Therefore, we conducted a case control investigation to assess the early-term safety and efficacy of this new technique by answering the following questions: does the KA technique for THA: (1) better restore the native hip anatomy, (2) generate a different radiographic supine cup position, and (3) improve clinical outcomes in comparison to the conventional mechanical alignment technique?

HYPOTHESES

Using KA technique allows there is no statistically significant difference between the pre to postoperative differential for acetabular medial and vertical offsets, femoral offset, and leg length.

METHODS

We led a case control retrospective study with prospectively collected clinical data. Forty-one consecutive unselected KA-THAs performed with manual instrumentation were paired with 41 mechanically aligned THAs. The 1-year clinical outcomes and radiographical measurements were compared.

RESULTS

Compared to the mechanical alignment technique, the KA technique resulted in a more anatomical restoration of the prosthetic hip centre of rotation with a lower delta pre- to post-operative horizontal acetabular offset (1.47mm for KA versus -5.1mm for MA, p=0.001), and with 74% of KA versus 50% of MA cups (p=0.044) being within 15% of native anatomy for the horizontal acetabular offset. In addition, the KA technique resulted in a higher cup anteversion (22°±7° vs 15°±8°, p<0.001) but similar cup inclination (41°±6° vs. 42°±7°, p=0.25), a similar proportion of cups within the Lewinnek zone (65% vs. 70%, p=0.8), similar excellent functional outcomes (delta Oxford score pre- to follow-up of 24.3 and 23.5 points for KA and MA groups, respectively, p=0.88), similar patient satisfaction scores of 95.4/100 and 89.5/100 for KA and MA groups, respectively, and the same absence of aseptic complications.

CONCLUSION

The KA technique for THA has been demonstrated to be safe, efficacious, and not inferior to the conventional MA technique at early-term. As the concept of the KA technique for THA is only at an early stage, its influence on mid to long-term clinical outcomes remains to be determined and further refinements of the concept are yet to be made.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control retrospective study.

Primary total hip arthroplasty: Staying out of trouble intraoperatively

Total hip Arthroplasty is one of the most successful and commonly performed procedures in Orthopaedic Surgery. Meticulous preoperative planning allows to surgeon anticipate potential problems to reduce postoperative complications and optimize patient outcomes. Currently, the posterior approach is the most common approach utilized in the United States. In order to prevent errors in stem version, especially with cementless fixation, the entry point should be posterior, and the initial entry point should be aligned in the correct anteversion as this will determine the ultimate version of the stem. Preoperative evaluation should asses for true and apparent lengths. For successful osseointegration of cementless components, bone ingrowth occurs when there is less than 40 μm of motion between the implant and bone. Certain socket conformations such as elliptical versus hemispherical are more prone to generate fractures at the time of impaction.

ACETABULAR COMPONENT ORIENTATION IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: THE ROLE OF ACETABULAR TRANSVERSE LIGAMENT

Objective:

The aim of our study is to present the benefit of using the transvers acetabular ligament for intraoperative determination of the anteversion of acetabular component.

Methods:

Twenty-one total hip arthroplasties were performed. The transverse acetabular ligament was identified and used as a guide to position the acetabular component.

Results:

The mean anteversion angle was 16.9. None of the patients studied sustained a postoperative dislocation during this short follow-up period.

Conclusion:

We conclude from this preliminary study that the transverse acetabular ligament can aid positioning of the acetabular component of a THR. It defines the version of the acetabular component without the need for external instrumentation, and is independent of the position of the patient. Level of Evidence IV; Prospective Study.

The Transverse Acetabular Ligament as an Intraoperative Guide to Cup Abduction

BACKGROUND

The success of a total hip arthroplasty relies on optimal acetabular cup placement to ensure mating of the femoral head and acetabular cup throughout all positions of the hip joint. Poor cup placement is associated with dislocation, impingement, microseparation, component loosening, and accelerated wear due to rim loading. This study examined a novel method of using the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) to guide cup inclination during primary total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A descriptive study using 16 hips from 9 cadavers. A computer navigation system measured inclination and version of the acetabular component in 3 positions with the lower edge of cup: (1) flush with, (2) 5 mm proximal to, and (3) 5 mm distal to free border of the TAL.

RESULTS

The median inclination angles were 44° in position (1), 30° in position (2), and 64° in position (3). The median anteversion angle for all positions was 19°.

CONCLUSION

Cup inclination was acceptable when the lower edge of the cup was flush or within 5 mm proximal to the TAL.

Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Repeatability and Reliability of EOS 3-Dimensional Imaging Analysis Software

BACKGROUND

Quantifying ideal component position for the acetabulum and stem during total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been described by many methods. A new imaging method using low-dose digital stereoradiography, the EOS imaging system, is a biplanar low-dose X-ray system that allows for 3-dimensional modeling of lower limbs and semiautomated measurement of pelvic parameters and implant alignment.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who underwent primary THA by a single surgeon between October 2014 and December 2014 were retrospectively selected. Only patients with unilateral THA without associated spine pathologies were included, totaling 16 right hips and 9 left hips. There were 8 men and 17 women in the cohort, with a mean age of 67 years (range, 53-82). Three individuals performed measurements of pelvic parameters and implant alignment on 3 separate occasions. An interclass correlation of >0.75 was accepted as evidence of excellent agreement and a confirmation of measurement reliability.

RESULTS

Before reviewing patient radiographs, 4 pelvic phantom models were analyzed using the EOS 3-dimensional software to verify accuracy. All anatomic and implant measurements performed by the 3 independent reviewers showed interobserver and intraobserver agreement with interclass correlation >0.75.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional modeling of hip implants with the EOS imaging system is a reasonable option for the evaluation of component position after THA.

Accuracy of an adjustable patient-specific guide for acetabular alignment in hip replacement surgery (Optihip)

Implant malalignment in hip arthroplasty increases the risk of revision surgery due to problems such as hip instability, wear, and impingement. Traditional instrumentation lacks accuracy and does not individualize the goal. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and patient-specific solutions improve accuracy but add considerably to the cost, amongst other drawbacks. We developed an adjustable mechanical device, called Optihip, which is set to a patient-specific goal preoperatively and is independent of pelvis position intraoperatively. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate Optihip's accuracy ex vivo. Acetabular components were implanted into six cadaveric specimens, 12 hips, by two surgeons, with the device individually adjusted according to preoperative templating on computed tomography (CT) images relative to defined acetabular rim landmarks; options also exist for templating on single or biplanar X-rays. Intraoperatively, the device was positioned on the corresponding anatomical landmarks allowing the insertion of a guide pin, which then defined the desired orientation of the acetabular cup during impaction. Mean absolute difference between the preoperatively planned cup alignment and final acetabular cup orientation, measured from postoperative CT images, was 2.5±1.2° for inclination and 2.5±2.2° for version with maximum values of 4.7° and 6.8°, respectively. Compared with previous in vivo reports, Optihip guided the acetabular cup orientation more accurately than conventional hip arthroplasty, and comparably to CAS or patient-specific systems, while fitting into the normal surgical workflow. Although clinical testing is required to confirm these experimental results, the positive ex vivo accuracy suggests good potential for improving revision rates and patient functional outcome.

An in vivo comparison of the orientation of the transverse acetabular ligament and the acetabulum

Aligning the acetabular component with the Transverse Acetabular Ligament (TAL) to ensure optimal anteversion has been reported to reduce dislocation rates. However, to our knowledge in vivo measurement of the TAL angle has not yet been reported in a large cohort of normal hips. CT scans of 218 normal hips were analyzed. The TAL and four acetabular rim anteversion angles were measured (superiorly to inferiorly) relative to the anterior pelvic plane. The mean TAL anteversion angle was 20.5° ± 7.0°, and the acetabular rim angles from superior to inferior were 11.0° ± 12.9°, 19.9° ± 8.8°, 20.9° ± 6.2° and 25.1° ± 6.2° respectively. Both the TAL and the acetabular rim were significantly more anteverted in females than in males. The TAL anteversion angle was comparable to the predominant orientation (central rim section) of the native acetabulum while the superior acetabulum was comparatively retroverted and the inferior was relatively more anteverted.

The use of the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip replacement

It has recently been reported that the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is helpful in determining the position of the acetabular component in total hip replacement (THR). In this study we used a computer-assisted navigation system to determine whether the TAL is useful as a landmark in THR. The study was carried out in 121 consecutive patients undergoing primary THR (134 hips), including 67 dysplastic hips (50%). There were 26 men (29 hips) and 95 women (105 hips) with a mean age of 60.2 years (17 to 82) at the time of operation. After identification of the TAL, its anteversion was measured intra-operatively by aligning the inferomedial rim of the trial acetabular component with the TAL using computer-assisted navigation. The TAL was identified in 112 hips (83.6%). Intra-observer reproducibility in the measurement of anteversion of the TAL was high, but inter-observer reproducibility was moderate.

Each surgeon was able to align the trial component according to the target value of the angle of anteversion of the TAL, but it was clear that methods may differ among surgeons. Of the measurements of the angle of anteversion of the TAL, 5.4% (6 of 112 hips) were outliers from the safe zone.

In summary, we found that the TAL is useful as a landmark when implanting the acetabular component within the safe zone in almost all hips, and to prevent it being implanted in retroversion in all hips, including dysplastic hips. However, as anteversion of the TAL may be excessive in a few hips, it is advisable to pay attention to individual variations, particularly in those with severe posterior pelvic tilt.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:306–11.

The use of the transverse acetabular ligament for determining the orientation of the components in total hip replacement

The orientation of the acetabular component can influence both the short- and long-term outcomes of total hip replacement (THR). We performed a prospective, randomised, controlled trial of two groups, comprising of 40 patients each, in order to compare freehand introduction of the component with introduction using the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) as a reference for anteversion. Anteversion and inclination were measured on pelvic radiographs.

With respect to anteversion, in the freehand group 22.5% of the components were outside the safe zone versus 0% in the transverse acetabular ligament group (p = 0.002). The mean angle of anteversion in the freehand group was 21° (2° to 35°) which was significantly higher compared with 17° (2° to 25°) in the TAL group (p = 0.004). There was a significant difference comparing the variations of both groups (p = 0.008).

With respect to inclination, in the freehand group 37.5% of the components were outside the safe zone versus 20% in the TAL group (p = 0.14). There was no significant difference regarding the accuracy or variation of the angle of inclination when comparing the two groups.

The transverse acetabular ligament may be used to obtain the appropriate anteversion when introducing the acetabular component during THR, but not acetabular component inclination.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:312–18.

A novel method for accurate and reproducible functional cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty

Cup positioning is an important variable for short and long term function, stability, and durability of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This novel method utilizes internal and external bony landmarks, and the transverse acetabular ligament for positioning the acetabular component. The cup is placed parallel and superior to the transverse ligament and inside the anterior wall notch of the true acetabulum, then adjusted for femoral version and pelvic tilt and obliquity based on weight bearing radiographs. In 78 consecutive THAs, the mean functional anteversion and abduction angles were 17.9° ± 4.7° and 41.7° ± 3.8°, respectively. 96% of the functional anteversion measurements and 100% of the functional abduction angles were within the safe zone. This technique is an easy, reproducible, and accurate method for functional cup placement.

Assessment of acetabulum anteversion aligned with the transverse acetabulum ligament: cadaveric study using image-free navigation system

The transverse acetabulum ligament (TAL) has been used as an intraoperative anatomical landmark to position the acetabulum cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the validity of the use of TAL has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to examine the orientation of the cup component aligned with the TAL in cadaveric study. The 31 hips in 25 whole-body embalmed cadavers were examined. The donors were 12 men and 13 women. Simulated THA procedure using image-free navigation system was performed and a trial cup with a diameter of approximately 2 mm less than the size of the acetabulum were inserted and snugly fitted on the TAL through the posterior wall of acetabulum. The orientation of the cup component was measured using an image-free THA navigation system. The measured radiographic anteversion and inclination angles averaged 18.2±7.2° (range: 2.0-33.2°) and 43.5±4.2° (range: 33.1-51.0°) respectively. Based on the Lewinnek's safe zone criteria, 26 hips (80.6%) were judged to be within the. Moreover, in the analysis of the gender difference of TAL angles, the average anteversion angle was shown to be significant larger in female than male population. The TAL can be effectively used an intraoperative landmark to align the acetabulum component helping reduce the risk of dislocation after surgery. In the intraoperative judgment, a gender difference in the alignment of the TAL should be taken into consideration.

Is the transverse acetabular ligament a reliable cup orientation guide?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It is controversial whether the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is a reliable guide for determining the cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated the variations in TAL anatomy and the TAL-guided cup orientation.

METHODS

80 hips with osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia (OA) and 80 hips with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ON) were examined. We compared the anatomical anteversion of TAL and the TAL-guided cup orientation in relation to both disease and gender using 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images.

RESULTS

Mean TAL anteversion was 11° (SD 10, range -12 to 35). The OA group (least-square mean 16°, 95% confidence interval (CI): 14-18) had larger anteversion than the ON group (least-square mean 6.2°, CI: 3.8 - 7.5). Females (least-square mean 20°, CI: 17-23) had larger anteversion than males (least-square mean 7.0°, CI: 4.6-9.3) in the OA group, while there were no differences between the sexes in the ON group. When TAL was used for anteversion guidance with the radiographic cup inclination fixed at 40°, 39% of OA hips and 9% of ON hips had more than 10° variance from the target anteversion, which was 15°.

INTERPRETATION

In ON hips, TAL is a good guide for determining cup orientation during THA, although it is not a reliable guide in hips with OA secondary to dysplasia. This is because TAL orientation has large individual variation and is influenced by disease and gender.