Modern cup alignment techniques in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

A systematic review was conducted to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of the alternative surgical techniques that consider the dynamic aspect of the acetabular orientation when aligning a cup (pelvic tilt-, lumbo-pelvic kinematics-, and spine-hip relationship-adjusted cup alignment techniques).

METHOD

Eight eligible articles reported the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed with alternative techniques. Clinical and radiological data were extracted. One study had a control group of patients who underwent conventional THAs (level III) while the seven other studies were level IV. Computer navigation system (CAS), Optimized Positioning System (OPS™), and manual instrumentation were used to align components in four, two, and two studies, respectively. A meta-analysis was not carried out because there was a lack of homogeneity between included articles regarding the method to position the cup and the nature of the reported data.

RESULTS

THA performed with alternative techniques had an early dislocation rate ranging from 0 to 1.9%, no unexpected catastrophic failure, and acceptable radiographic cup orientations. One study compared kinematically and mechanically aligned THAs and found no dislocation in either groups, similar patient reported outcome measures (43 Oxford-12 Score for both groups), and similar proportions of cup in the Lewinnek zone (respectively 65% and 70%).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Alternative methods accounting for the functional acetabular orientation seem to be clinically safe and effective in the early-term, and generate acceptable cup orientation on radiographs. Their values compare to those of more conventional techniques for cup implantation remain to be determined. We developed a classification of the multiple methods for aligning an acetabular component.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Comparison of lumbo-pelvic kinematics during trunk forward bending and backward return between patients with acute low back pain and asymptomatic controls

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have reported differences in lumbo-pelvic kinematics during a trunk forward bending and backward return task between individuals with and without chronic low back pain; yet, the literature on lumbo-pelvic kinematics of patients with acute low back pain is scant. Therefore, the purpose of this study was set to investigate lumbo-pelvic kinematics in this cohort.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted to investigate the differences in pelvic and thoracic rotation along with lumbar flexion as well as their first and second time derivatives between females with and without acute low back pain. Participants in each group completed one experimental session wherein they performed trunk forward bending and backward return at self-selected and fast paces.

FINDINGS

Compared to controls, individuals with acute low back pain had larger pelvic range of rotations and smaller lumbar range of flexions. Patients with acute low back pain also adopted a slower pace compared to asymptomatic controls which was reflected in smaller maximum values for angular velocity, deceleration and acceleration of lumbar flexion. Irrespective of participant group, smaller pelvic range of rotation and larger lumbar range of flexion were observed in younger vs. older participants.

INTERPRETATION

Reduced lumbar range of flexion and slower task pace, observed in patients with acute low back pain, may be the result of a neuromuscular adaptation to reduce the forces and deformation in the lower back tissues and avoid pain aggravation.