Frequency of radiographic signs of slipped capital femoral epiphysiolysis sequelae in hip arthroplasty candidates for coxarthrosis

The incidence and management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a population-based study

We aimed to investigate the national trends in the incidence and management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and to report the need for reoperations. We included all <19-year-old patients hospitalised for SCFE in 2004-2014 in mainland Finland (n=159). Data from the Finnish Care Register for Health Care, Statistics Finland, and Turku University Hospital patient charts were analyse for the incidence of SCFE in 2004-2012, the length of stay, and the type of surgery with respect to age, gender, study year, and season. The reoperations and rehospitalisations in 2004-2014 for SCFE were analysed for 2-10 years after surgery. In 2004 to 2012, primary surgery for SCFE was performed for 126 children. The average annual incidence of SCFE was 1.06/100 000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.38) in girls and 1.35/100 000 (95% CI 1.07-1.70) in boys. The median age at surgery was lower in girls than in boys (11 and 13 years, respectively, p<0.0001). During the study period, there was no significant change in the incidence of SCFE (p=0.9330), the type of primary procedures performed (p=0.9988), or the length of stay after the primary procedure (p=0.2396). However, the length of stay after percutaneous screw fixation was shorter compared with open reduction and fixation (mean 3.4 and 7.9 days, respectively, p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the rate of reoperations according to the type of primary surgery. In conclusion, the incidence of SCFE and the proportion of different primary surgeries have recently remained stable in Finland.

Is a Femoro-Acetabular Impingement Type Cam Predictable after Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

(1) Background: Previous studies have proven a high incidence of a femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) type cam in patients sustaining a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Thus, the current study analyzed, if a cam deformity is predictable after SCFE treatment; (2) Methods: 113 cases of SCFE were treated between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2017. The radiological assessment included the slip angle after surgery (referenced to the femoral neck (epiphyseal tilt) and shaft axis as Southwick angle) and the last available lateral center edge angle (LCEA), the acetabular- and alpha angle. A correlation was performed between these parameters and the last alpha angle to predict a FAI type cam; (3) Results: After a mean follow-up of 4.3 years (±1.9; 2.0-11.2), 48.5% of the patients showed a FAI type cam and 43.2% a dysplasia on the affected side. The correlation between the epiphyseal tilt and alpha angle was statically significant (p = 0.017) with a medium effect size of 0.28; (4) Conclusions: The postoperative posterior epiphyseal tilt was predictive factor to determine the alpha angle. However, the cut-off value of the slip angle was 16.8° for a later occurrence of a FAI type cam indicating a small range of acceptable deviations from the anatomical position for SCFE reconstruction.

Which anatomical conditions are associated with limitations of the hip function after SCFE?

Background

Patients sustained a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) might have symptoms beyond their stabilization surgery in the childhood.

Methods

35 patients with a SCFE were treated in our clinic and available for a clinical follow-up. The results were compared in dependence of the presence of dysplasia, acetabular retroversion or a FAI type CAM.

Results

A FAI type CAM led to significant inferior results (p < 0.05), especially in combination with a retroversion.

Conclusions

The clinical outcome seemed to be influenced by the presence of a FAI type CAM or a combination with a retroversion, which might aggravate the femoro-acetabular conflict.

Level of evidence

III, retrospective.

A Cam Morphology Develops in the Early Phase of the Final Growth Spurt in Adolescent Ice Hockey Players: Results of a Prospective MRI-based Study

BACKGROUND

Cam morphologies seem to develop with an increased prevalence in adolescent boys performing high-impact sports. The crucial question is at what age the cam morphology actually develops and whether there is an association with an aberration of the shape of the growth plate at the cam morphology site.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the frequency of cam morphologies in adolescent ice hockey players, and when do they appear? (2) Is there an association between an extension of the physeal growth plate and the development of a cam morphology? (3) How often do these players demonstrate clinical findings like pain and lack of internal rotation?

METHODS

A prospective, longitudinal MRI study was done to monitor the proximal femoral development and to define the appearance of cam morphologies in adolescent ice hockey players during the final growth spurt. Young ice hockey players from the local boys' league up to the age of 13 years (mean age 12 ± 0.5 years) were invited to participate. From 35 players performing on the highest national level, 25 boys and their parents consented to participate. None of these 25 players had to be excluded for known disease or previous surgery or hip trauma. At baseline examination as well as 1.5 and 3 years later, we performed a prospective noncontrast MRI scan and a clinical examination. The three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur was assessed by one of the authors using radial images of the hip in a clockwise manner. The two validated parameters were: (1) the alpha angle for head asphericity (abnormal > 60°) and (2) the epiphyseal extension for detecting an abnormality in the shape of the capital physis and a potential correlation at the site of the cam morphology. The clinical examination was performed by one of the authors evaluating (1) internal rotation in 90° of hip and knee flexion and (2) hip pain during the anterior impingement test.

RESULTS

Cam morphologies were most apparent at the 1.5-year follow-up interval (10 of 25; baseline versus 1.5-year follow-up: p = 0.007) and a few more occurred between 1.5 and 3 years (12 of 23; 1.5-year versus 3-year follow-up: p = 0.14). At 3-year follow-up, there was a positive correlation between increased epiphyseal extension and a high alpha angle at the anterosuperior quadrant (1 o'clock to 3 o'clock) (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.341; p < 0.003). The prevalence of pain on the impingement test and/or restricted internal rotation less than 20° increased most between 1.5-year (1 of 25) and the 3-year follow-up (6 of 22; 1.5-year versus 3-year follow-up: p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that a cam morphology develops early during the final growth spurt of the femoral head in adolescent ice hockey players predominantly between 13 to 16 years of age. A correlation between an increased extension of the growth plate and an increased alpha angle at the site of the cam morphology suggests a potential underlying growth disturbance. This should be further followed by high-resolution or biochemical MRI methods. Considering the high number of cam morphologies that correlated with abnormal clinical findings, we propose that adolescents performing high-impact sports should be screened for signs of cam impingement, such as by asking about hip pain and/or examining the patient for limited internal hip rotation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prognostic study.

Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement by arthroscopy versus anterior mini-open approach: Case-control study of a continuous series of 91 cases at a mean 4.6 years' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Femoroacetabular impingement is a frequent cause of hip pain, and can be managed by conservative surgery. Many studies assessed postoperative course, but none compared operative techniques within a given population. We therefore conducted a retrospective case-control study comparing the minimally invasive anterior Hueter approach versus arthroscopy, assessing difference in 1) functional gain and 2) complications and 3) analyzing the impact of labral or cartilage lesions on functional scores.

HYPOTHESIS

Clinical results do not differ between the mini-open and arthroscopic approach.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Between 2007 and 2018, 91 hips in 84 patients were treated for femoroacetabular impingement: 69/91 (75.8%) cam effect, 6/91 pincer effect (6.6%) and 16/91 mixed (17.6%). Fifty-five were treated by arthroscopy and 36 by the Hueter mini-open approach. There were 20 female and 71 male hips. Mean age at surgery was 32 years (range, 17-55 years). Potential predictive factors comprised Nötzli alpha angle, labral/cartilage lesion and type of surgery.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 4.6 years (range, 1-16 years), with no loss to follow-up. The arthroscopy and Hueter groups showed no differences in functional improvement on Oxford-12 score (gain, -6.7±5.9 versus -6.2±8.1 (p=0.73), Postel Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score (gain, 1.3±1 versus 1.1±0.9; p=0.41), operative time (75 versus 67min; p=0.16), or alpha angle correction (-10.9±12.9 versus -9.8±7.1; p=0.22). Complications did not differ: 1/55 severe complications after arthroscopy (1 definitive femoral nerve palsy) versus 4/36 non-severe complications after Hueter (3 cases of dysesthesia in the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh, 1 rectus femoris enthesopathy) (p=0.15). Labral lesions (37/91) did not affect clinical outcome: gain, 1.2±1 versus 1.3±0.9 on PMA (p=0.514) and -7.3±6 versus -6±7.3 on Oxford-12 (p=0.366). Cartilage lesions (27/91) were associated with poorer outcome on PMA (gain, 1±1.1 versus 1.3±0.9; p=002) but not on Oxford-12 (gain, -6.1±7.3 versus -6.7±6.6; p=0.288).

CONCLUSION

Impingement correction by the minimally invasive anterior Hueter approach gave clinical results comparable to those of hip arthroscopy in terms of Oxford and PMA scores, alpha angle correction, operative time and complications. Cartilage lesions were associated with poorer clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective case-control study.

Factors Affecting Outcomes of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a frequent cause of nontraumatic painful hip of the adolescence. It is the result of the separation of the proximal femoral growth cartilage at the level of the hypertrophic cell zone. The femoral neck metaphysis rotates externally and migrates proximally relative to the femoral head epiphysis, which is stably seated in the acetabulum; early diagnosis and in situ stabilization grants the best long term results. Numerous factors affect treatment outcomes. Not all implants have the same effect on the slipped physis. Application of the traditionally used implants, such as non-threaded pins and cannulated screws, is questioned. Modern implants are available, which stabilize the slip without accelerating physis fusion. This allows femoral head and neck growth and remodeling to limit the post-slip sequellae on hip anatomy and function. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) complicates almost all slips. It causes progressive labral and articular cartilage damage and leads to early hip osteoarthritis and total hip replacement, approximately ten years earlier compared to the general population. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is a dramatic complication, seen almost exclusively in unstable slips. It develops within months after the slip and leads to immediate articular joint degeneration and the need for total hip replacement. Another serious complication of SCFE is chondrolysis, which is a rapid progressive articular cartilage degeneration leading to a narrow joint space and restriction of hip motion. Implant-related complications, such as migration and loosening, may lead to the progression of the slip. Though bilateral disease is quite frequent, there is no consensus about the need for preventive surgery on the healthy contralateral hip. Diagnosis of SCFE is frequently missed or delayed, leading to slips of higher severity. Silent slippage of the capital femoral epiphysis is highly suspected as an underlying cause of cam-type FAI and early-onset hip osteoarthritis. There is controversy, whether asymptomatic implants should be removed. Novel surgical techniques, such as the modified Dunn procedure and hip arthroscopy, seem to be effective modalities for the prevention of FAI in SCFE.

A novel surgical navigation technology for placement of implants in slipped capital femoral epiphysis

BACKGROUND

Fixation with a single screw is the recommended treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Achieving optimal implant positioning can be difficult owing to the complex geometry of the proximal femur in SCFE. We assessed a novel navigation technology incorporating an inertial measurement unit to facilitate implant placement in an SCFE model.

METHODS

Guidewires were placed into 30 SCFE models, using a navigation system that displayed the surgeon's projected implant trajectory simultaneously in multiple planes. The accuracy and the precision of the system were assessed as was the time to perform the procedure.

RESULTS

Implants were placed an average of 5.3 mm from the femoral head center, with a system precision of 0.94 mm. The actual trajectory of the implant deviated from the planned trajectory by an average of 4.9° ± 2.2°. The total average procedure time was 97 seconds.

CONCLUSION

The use of computer-based navigation in a SCFE model demonstrated good accuracy and precision in terms of both implant trajectory and placement in the center of the femoral head.

Radiation-free methods for navigated screw placement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis surgery

PURPOSE

For orthopedic procedures, surgeons utilize intra-operative medical images such as fluoroscopy to plan screw placement and accurately position the guide wire with the intended trajectory. The number of fluoroscopic images needed depends on the complexity of the case and skill of the surgeon. Since more fluoroscopic images lead to more exposure and higher radiation dose for both surgeon and patient, a solution that decreases the number of fluoroscopic images would be an improvement in clinical care.

METHODS

This article describes and compares three different novel navigation methods and techniques for screw placement using an attachable Inertial Measurement Unit device or a robotic arm. These methods provide projection and visualization of the surgical tool trajectory during the slipped capital femoral epiphysis procedure.

RESULTS

These techniques resulted in faster and more efficient preoperative calibration and set up times compared to other intra-operative navigation systems in our phantom study. We conducted an experiment using 120 model bones to measure the accuracy of the methods.

CONCLUSION

As conclusion, these approaches have the potential to improve accuracy of surgical tool navigation and decrease the number of required X-ray images without any change in the clinical workflow. The results also show 65% decrease in total error compared to the conventional manual approach.

Morphologic Features of the Contralateral Femur in Patients With Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Resembles Mild Slip Deformity: A Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Hip osteoarthritis has been reported in the contralateral hip in patients who had been treated for unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) during adolescence. Although this might be related to the presence of a mild deformity, the morphologic features of the contralateral hip in unilateral SCFE remains poorly characterized.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Do measurements of (1) femoral head-neck concavity (α angle and femoral head-neck offset), (2) epiphyseal extension into the metaphysis (epiphyseal extension ratio and epiphyseal angle), and (3) posterior tilt of the epiphysis (epiphyseal tilt angle) differ between the contralateral asymptomatic hips of patients treated for unilateral SCFE and hips of an age- and sex-matched control population without a history of hip disease?

METHODS

From January 2005 to May 2015, 442 patients underwent surgical treatment for SCFE at our institution. Patients were included in this study if they had a pelvic CT scan and unilateral SCFE defined by pain or a limp in one hip without symptoms or obligatory external rotation with flexion in the contralateral hip and no evidence of SCFE findings on available radiographs. Seventy-two (16%) patients had a pelvic CT scan; however, 32 patients with bilateral involvement and one patient with CT imaging of inadequate quality for multiplanar reformatting were excluded. Thirty-nine control subjects were identified from a preexisting database of patients who underwent pelvic CT between January 2008 and January 2014 for assessment of abdominal pain in the setting of suspected appendicitis. Patients in the contralateral asymptomatic hip group then were matched to control subjects using a modified nearest-neighbor approach based on sex and age. Patients in the contralateral asymptomatic hip group were separated in males and females and control subjects were assigned to an appropriate sex category. Then subjects closest in age were matched with each patient. If more than one subject was available as a match for a given patient, the control subject with the closest BMI was selected. The contralateral asymptomatic hip and matched groups had 19 (49%) male patients and 20 (51%) female patients, with mean ages (± SD) of 16 (± 3) years and 16 (± 3) years, respectively (p = 0.16). Matched subjects had a mean BMI of 25 ± 4 kg/m and the mean BMI difference among groups was 5 ± 5 kg/m (p < 0.001). According to the Southwick radiographic criteria nine patients (23%) had a mild slip, 10 (26%) had a moderate slip, and 19 (49%) had severe SCFE. The α angle and femoral head-neck offset, epiphyseal extension ratio and epiphyseal angle, and epiphyseal tilt were assessed in the anterior, anterosuperior, and superior femoral planes on radially reformatted CT by one observer not involved in clinical care of the patients. Inter- and intrarater reliability were determined on 10 randomly selected hips assessed by the same observer and another observer and it was found to be excellent for all femoral measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.85). Paired t-tests were used to compare the contralateral asymptomatic hip of patients with SCFE and control hips.

RESULTS

The head-neck junction showed decreased concavity in the contralateral femur of patients with unilateral SCFE compared with control subjects as assessed by slightly higher mean α angle in the anterosuperior plane (51° ± 6° versus 48° ± 7°; mean difference, 2°, 95% CI, 0°-5°; p = 0.04) and slightly higher median α angle in the superior plane (45° [range 37°-72°] versus 42° [range, 36°-50°], median shift, 4° [range, 2°-5°], p < 0.001), and slightly lower head-neck offset (anterosuperior: 5 mm ± 2 mm versus 6 mm ± 2 mm, mean difference, -1mm [range, -1 mm to 0 mm], p = 0.009; superior: median, 6 mm [range, 1 mm-8 mm] versus 7 mm [range, 5 mm-9 mm]; median shift, -1 mm [range, -1 mm to 0 mm], p < 0.001). There was less epiphyseal extension in the anterosuperior plane as evidenced by lower epiphyseal extension ratio (72% ± 6% versus 75% ± 6%; p = 0.005) and higher epiphyseal angle (64° ± 7° versus 60° ± 7°; p = 0.003). The epiphysis was slightly more posteriorly tilted (anterior plane tilt: 8° ± 6° versus 5° ± 4°; p = 0.03) and more vertically oriented (superior plane tilt 11° ± 5° versus 14° ± 4°; p = 0.006) in the contralateral asymptomatic hip of patients with SCFE.

CONCLUSIONS

The contralateral femur in patients treated for unilateral SCFE shows decreased concavity of the head-neck junction assessed by a higher α angle and reduced head-neck offset compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects. Because we noted lower epiphyseal extension but a more posteriorly tilted epiphysis, the reduced concavity resembles a mild slip deformity rather than an idiopathic cam morphologic feature.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although we noted a difference in the morphologic features of the head-neck junction between the two groups, the clinical significance is unclear because most differences were rather small. However, our findings suggest that the uninvolved hip in patients with unilateral SCFE may have a subtle asymptomatic cam morphologic feature that may be identified only with advanced imaging (CT or MRI). Future studies should investigate whether these morphologic changes influence development of contralateral SCFE or symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement in the contralateral hip of patients with unilateral SCFE and establish thresholds for indication of prophylactic fixation to avoid further slip and worsening of the morphologic features of the cam-femoroacetabular impingement.

Radiation dose and magnification in pelvic X-ray: EOS™ imaging system versus plain radiographs

BACKGROUND

In plain pelvic X-ray, magnification makes measurement unreliable. The EOS™ (EOS Imaging, Paris France) imaging system is reputed to reproduce patient anatomy exactly, with a lower radiation dose. This, however, has not been assessed according to patient weight, although both magnification and irradiation are known to vary with weight. We therefore conducted a prospective comparative study, to compare: (1) image magnification and (2) radiation dose between the EOS imaging system and plain X-ray.

HYPOTHESIS

The EOS imaging system reproduces patient anatomy exactly, regardless of weight, unlike plain X-ray.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A single-center comparative study of plain pelvic X-ray and 2D EOS radiography was performed in 183 patients: 186 arthroplasties; 104 male, 81 female; mean age 61.3±13.7years (range, 24-87years). Magnification and radiation dose (dose-area product [DAP]) were compared between the two systems in 186 hips in patients with a mean body-mass index (BMI) of 27.1±5.3kg/m² (range, 17.6-42.3kg/m²), including 7 with morbid obesity.

RESULTS

Mean magnification was zero using the EOS system, regardless of patient weight, compared to 1.15±0.05 (range, 1-1.32) on plain X-ray (P<10^-5). In patients with BMI<25, mean magnification on plain X-ray was 1.15±0.05 (range, 1-1.25) and, in patients with morbid obesity, 1.22±0.06 (range, 1.18-1.32). The mean radiation dose was 8.19±2.63dGy/cm² (range, 1.77-14.24) with the EOS system, versus 19.38±12.37dGy/cm² (range, 4.77-81.75) with plain X-ray (P<10^-4). For BMI >40, mean radiation dose was 9.36±2.57dGy/cm² (range, 7.4-14.2) with the EOS system, versus 44.76±22.21 (range, 25.2-81.7) with plain X-ray. Radiation dose increased by 0.20dGy with each extra BMI point for the EOS system, versus 0.74dGy for plain X-ray.

CONCLUSION

Magnification did not vary with patient weight using the EOS system, unlike plain X-ray, and radiation dose was 2.5-fold lower.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3, prospective case-control study.

Twelve percent of hips with a primary cam deformity exhibit a slip-like morphology resembling sequelae of slipped capital femoral epiphysis

BACKGROUND

In some hips with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), we observed a morphology resembling a more subtle form of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Theoretically, the morphology in these hips should differ from hips with a primary cam-type deformity.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked if (1) head-neck offset; (2) epiphyseal angle; and (3) tilt angle differ among hips with a slip-like morphology, idiopathic cam, hips after in situ pinning of SCFE, and normal hips; and (4) what is the prevalence of a slip-like morphology among cam-type hips?

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the three-dimensional anatomy of hips with a slip-like morphology (29 hips), in situ pinning for SCFE (eight hips), idiopathic cam deformity (171 hips), and 30 normal hips using radial MRI arthrography. Normal hips were derived from 17 asymptomatic volunteers. All other hips were recruited from a series of 277 hips (243 patients) seen at a specialized academic hip center between 2006 and 2010. Forty-one hips with isolated pincer deformity were excluded. Thirty-six of 236 hips had a known cause of cam impingement (secondary cam), including eight hips after in situ pinning of SCFE (postslip group). The 200 hips with a primary cam were separated in hips with a slip-like morphology (combination of positive fovea sign [if the neck axis did not intersect with the fovea capitis] and a tilt angle [between the neck axis and perpendicular to the basis of the epiphysis] exceeding 4°) and hips with an idiopathic cam. We evaluated offset ratio, epiphyseal angle (angle between the neck axis and line connecting the center of the femoral head and the point where the physis meets the articular surface), and tilt angle circumferentially around the femoral head-neck axis. Prevalence of slip-like morphology was determined based on the total of 236 hips with cam deformities.

RESULTS

Offset ratio was decreased anterosuperiorly in idiopathic cam, slip-like, and postslip (eg, 1 o'clock position with a mean offset ranging from 0.00 to 0.14; p < 0.001 for all groups) compared with normal hips (0.25 ± 0.06 [95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.37]) and increased posteroinferiorly in slip-like (eg, 8 o'clock position, 0.5 ± 0.09 [0.32-0.68]; p < 0.001) and postslip groups (0.55 ± 0.12 [0.32-0.78]; p < 0.001) and did not differ in idiopathic cam (0.32 ± 0.09 [0.15-0.49]; p = 0.323) compared with normal (0.31 ± 0.07 [0.18-0.44]) groups. Epiphyseal angle was increased anterosuperiorly in the slip-like (eg, 1 o'clock position, 70° ± 9° [51°-88°]; p < 0.001) and postslip groups (75° ± 13° [49°-100°]; p = 0.008) and decreased in idiopathic cam (50° ± 8° [35°-65°]; p < 0.001) compared with normal hips (58° ± 8° [43°-74°]). Posteroinferiorly, epiphyseal angle was decreased in slip-like (eg, 8 o'clock position, 54° ± 10° [34°-74°]; p < 0.001) and postslip (44° ± 11° [23°-65°]; p < 0.001) groups and did not differ in idiopathic cam (76° ± 8° [61°-91°]; p = 0.099) compared with normal (73° ± 7° [59°-88°]) groups. Tilt angle increased in slip-like (eg, 2/8 o'clock position, 14° ± 8° [-1° to 30°]; p < 0.001) and postslip hips (29° ± 10° [9°-48°]; p < 0.001) and decreased in hips with idiopathic cam (-7° ± 5° [-17° to 4°]; p < 0.001) compared with normal (-1° ± 5° [-10° to 8°]) hips. The prevalence of a slip-like morphology was 12%.

CONCLUSIONS

The slip-like morphology is the second most frequent pathomorphology in hips with primary cam deformity. MRI arthrography of the hip allows identifying a slip-like morphology, which resembles hips after in situ pinning of SCFE and distinctly differs from hips with idiopathic cam. These results support previous studies reporting that SCFE might be a risk factor for cam-type FAI.

The frequency of sequelae of slipped upper femoral epiphysis in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is one of the known causes of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of FAI cases considered to be secondary to SUFE-like deformities.

We performed a case–control study on 96 hips (75 patients: mean age 38 years (15.4 to 63.5)) that had been surgically treated for FAI between July 2005 and May 2011. Three independent observers measured the lateral view head–neck index (LVHNI) to detect any SUFE-like deformity on lateral hip radiographs taken in 45° flexion, 45° abduction and 30° external rotation. A control group of 108 healthy hips in 54 patients was included for comparison (mean age 36.5 years (24.3 to 53.9).

The impingement group had a mean LVHNI of 7.6% (16.7% to -2%) versus 3.2% in the control group (10.8% to -3%) (p < 0.001). A total of 42 hips (43.7%) had an index value > 9% in the impingement group versus only six hips (5.5%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The impingement group had a mean α angle of 73.9° (96.2° to 53.4°) versus 48.2° (65° to 37°) in the control group (p < 0.001).

Our results suggest that SUFE is one of the primary aetiological factors for cam-type FAI.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:724–9.