Impact of preoperative varus deformity on postoperative mechanical alignment and long-term results of "mechanical" aligned total knee arthroplasty

Comparison of Outcomes in Obese Patients after Total Knee Arthroplasty with Neutral or Mild Varus: A Retrospective Study with 8-Year Follow-Up

OBJECTIVES

Residual varus after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can affect functional outcomes, which may worsen in the presence of obesity. However, no studies were found to compare the outcomes of obese patients involving postoperative residual mild varus or neutral. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative complications and prosthesis survival, and functional outcomes for knees of obese patients with neutral or mild varus after TKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 188 consecutive obese patients (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) at our hospital who underwent TKA due to varus knee osteoarthritis from January 2010 to December 2015. The mechanical hip-knee-ankle axis angle was measured in all patients at admission and discharge. Knee functions were retrospectively assessed based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee Society Knee Score (KS-KS), Knee Society Function Score (KS-FS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and range of motion (ROM). Continuous data were compared between knees with neutral or mild varus alignment using analysis of Student's t test or variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate. For multiple comparisons of outcomes, we used Bonferroni-Dunn method to adjust p-values. Categorical data were compared using the chi-squared test.

RESULTS

Of the 156 knees in 137 obese patients who completed follow-up for a mean of 8.32 ± 1.47 years, 97 knees were corrected from varus to neutral and 54 knees were kept in mild residual varus. Patients with mild varus knees had significantly WOMAC (8.25 ± 8.637 vs. 14.97 ± 14.193, p = 0.009) and better FJS (86.03 ± 15.607 vs. 70.22 ± 30.031, p = 0.002). The two types of knees did not differ significantly in KS-KS, KS-FS, or ROM. Although one patient with a neutral knee had to undergo revision surgery, there was no significant difference between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For obese patients with osteoarthritis, preservation of residual varus alignment after TKA can improve functional outcomes without compromising prosthesis survival.

Small change in the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves early postoperative functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The optimal lower-limb alignment after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the optimal lower-limb alignment for functional improvement in the early post-UKA period. We hypothesized that a small change (Δ) in the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle during surgery would result in better postoperative knee function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-centered, retrospective study analyzed 91 patients (91 knees) who underwent UKA from April 2021 and December 2022. Preoperative and postoperative standing whole-leg radiographs were used to evaluate the mechanical HKA angle and aHKA angle. The aHKA angle was calculated from the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). We defined restored aHKA angle as a postoperative aHKA angle within ± 3° of the preoperative aHKA angle. Functional improvement was evaluated using the preoperative and one-year postoperative Knee Society Scoring 2011 (KSS 2011). A multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate the optimal lower-limb alignment for functional improvement.

RESULT

Postoperative restored aHKA angle (p = 0.020) was the only significant factor for improved KSS 2011 scores. Postoperative restored aHKA angle was obtained in 64 patients (70%). ΔMPTA (p < 0.001) and ΔLDFA (p = 0.037) were significant factors associated with a postoperative restored aHKA angle.

CONCLUSIONS

UKA restores the native knee, including resurfacing constitutional alignment and medial collateral ligament tension. Minimal change in the aHKA angle during UKA improves the functional outcomes of the knee during the early postoperative period, consistent with the minimally invasive surgical concept of UKA.

Limb length change after total knee arthroplasty for valgus deformity does not affect the clinical score and is not affected by fixed flexion deformity

BACKGROUND

The limb length change (LLC) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is especially significant in valgus deformity. The higher LLC could cause higher incidences of lower limb length discrepancy (LLD) and low clinical score. However, studies about LLC after TKA for valgus deformity are limited, and there are none on the relationship between LLC and fixed flexion deformity (FFD) in valgus deformity.

HYPOTHESIS

(1) The amount of LLC would affect the postoperative LLD, (2) the improvement of fixed flexion deformity (FFD) would affect the amount of LLC, (3) The amount of LLC would affect the improvement in the clinical score after TKA for valgus deformity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty knees of 50 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA for valgus-type osteoarthritis between January 2000 and October 2021 were included. A radiological and clinical assessment were performed the day before the operation and at 12 months post-operatively. Full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs were used to measure HKA and LLC. FFD and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score were measured in the outpatient department.

RESULTS

The incidence of lengthening was 92.0% and the mean LLC was 18.85mm (SD, 19.60mm). Postoperative LLD over 10mm occurred in 26% and the mean of postoperative LLD was 4.21mm (SD, 7.96mm). The LLC was correlated with postoperative LLD (rs=0.357, p=0.011) and the HKA change (rs=0.375, p=0.007), but not with the FFD improvement (rs=0.164, p=0.255) and HSS improvement (rs=0.076, p=0.613) or postoperative HSS (rs=0.094, p=0.528).

CONCLUSION

LLC was affected by HKA improvement but not by FFD improvement after TKA for patients with valgus deformity. Additionally, LLC did not affect the clinical score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective cohort study.

Uncemented trabecular metal high-flex posterior-stabilized monoblock total knee arthroplasty in patients aged 60 years or younger

BACKGROUND

Uncemented trabecular metal (TM) monoblock tibial components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have shown excellent clinical results for up to 10 years. However, these studies were performed in highly specialized units, with few surgeons and often excluding knees with secondary osteoarthritis (OA), severe malalignments and previous surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate implant survivorship and clinical and radiological outcome of the uncemented TM high-flex posterior stabilized (PS) monoblock tibial component in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 339 knees (282 patients) operated with the implant in routine clinical practice at two hospitals on patients aged 60 years or younger between 2007 and 2015. The operations were performed by 12 surgeons and there were no specific contraindications for use of the implant. Follow up ended in 2020. The status of the implant of deceased patients at death and those not attending follow up was checked with the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Clinical follow up consisted of clinical investigation, PROMs, and knee X-ray.

RESULTS

Follow up was mean (range) 8.5 (5-13.8) years, and the 8-year survival rate was 0.98 (standard error 0.007). Five patients five knees) were deceased, five knees were revised (none due to aseptic loosening), and 16 patients did not attend the clinical follow up. Forty-four percent of the knees had secondary OA and 45% had had previous operations. 93% were satisfied or very satisfied with the operation and forgotten joint score (FJS) was median (interquartile range) 81 (44-94). Radiographic analysis revealed bone in close contact with the tibial tray and pegs in most cases, and in only 2% of the knees were potential radiolucent lines found.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that this uncemented implant performs excellently in routine clinical practice and also in younger patients with secondary OA or previous knee operations.

Achieving Correct Balance in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Fixed Varus Deformity

Varus knee deformity is one of the most common deformities presenting for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). When present, a varus knee deformity contributes to overload of the medial joint compartment during gait, leading to increased medial compartment forces as well as lateral soft tissue lengthening. Additionally, a fixed varus deformity is associated with medial soft tissue contractures of the deep and superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) and posteromedial capsule. With a fixed varus deformity, soft tissue releases may be necessary to create equivalent and rectangular flexion and extension gaps. There may also be anteromedial tibial bone defects, medial femoral condyle defects, and occasionally flexion contractures, especially in more severe cases. In cases of severe varus deformity with medial tibial bone loss, bone defects must be addressed to ensure adequate implant support. In many cases, a primary knee implant can be utilized in cases of varus knee deformity, but occasionally prostheses with higher levels of constraint may be required to balance and stabilize the knee. TKA has had a successful track record, with high levels of long-term implant survivorship even in cases of severe varus. Iatrogenic MCL instability and tibial aseptic loosening are complications associated with TKA in cases of severe varus, and multiple methods to avoid complications are presented here.

Comparison of clinical, imaging and second-look arthroscopic outcomes between varus knee patients with and without preoperative tibial varus deformity after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the regeneration status of articular cartilage, clinical, and radiologic outcomes between varus knee patients with and without preoperative tibial varus deformity (PTVD) after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) METHODS: Varus knee patients who had undergone OWHTO were divided into two groups according to preoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA): a great varus (GV) group (MPTA <85°) and a mild varus (MV) group (85°≤preoperative MPTA <87°). The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, weight-bearing line ratio (WBL%), MPTA, joint line convergence angle and joint line obliquity were measured. Second-look arthroscopy was undertaken 24 months after HTO. The Knee Society (KS) function score and knee score, and Lysholm score were used to evaluate the functional outcomes. All parameters were evaluated preoperatively and 24 months after HTO.

RESULTS

The GV group had greater varus than the MV group in HKA and WBL% before surgery, but greater valgus after surgery. The arthroscopic probe before HTO revealed the advanced chondral damage in the GV group and lighter chondral damage in the MV group. The regeneration of medial femoral condyle was considerably more frequent in the GV group (72.5%, 45/62) than in the MV group (50.0%, 27/54) (P = 0.030). No significant differences were observed in all functional outcomes preoperatively and 24 months after HTO.

CONCLUSION

The extent of cartilage regeneration in patients without PTVD was inferior to that in those with PTVD, but the functional outcomes were comparable. OWHTO may be a treatment option in a selected subset of varus knee patients without PTVD.

Optimal Sequence of Corrective Surgeries for Concomitant Valgus Knee and Rigid Pes Planus Deformities: The Knee-First Approach

In patients requiring surgical correction of ipsilateral valgus knee and rigid pes planovalgus deformities, the optimal operative sequence is controversial. Growing evidence suggests these 2 deformities are related in etiology and interrelated in disease course. We present the case of a 72-year-old female with concomitant valgus knee and rigid pes planovalgus deformities successfully treated with total knee arthroplasty followed by triple arthrodesis and Achilles lengthening. Surgical correction of these deformities must be carefully planned between the operating surgeons to avoid over- or under-correction of alignment that could further impact gait. In contrast with the limited available literature, the authors recommend correction at the knee first and the foot and ankle second. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the best operative sequence in these patients.

Twenty-year survivorship cohort study of total knee arthroplasty in Asian patient using a single posterior-stabilized implant performed by a single surgeon

INTRODUCTION

As life expectancy has improved, the potential number of revision candidates is also expected to increase among patients who have undergone a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The longevity of modern posterior stabilized knee prostheses after 20 years of use has not been well documented, especially in Asian populations that require a deeper flexion range due to a floor-based lifestyle.

HYPOTHESIS

Firstly, the implant longevity regarding mechanical failures such as aseptic loosening and polyethylene (PE) wear would vary over a longer follow-up depending on the age groups; and secondly there would be unique risk factors for revision surgery in an Asian TKA cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted this age-stratified survival analysis in a consecutive series of 368 NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilized (LPS) TKAs performed by a single surgeon. These cases were divided into four age groups (< 60 years, early 60s, late 60s, and ≥ 70 years). The implant longevity against aseptic mechanical failures was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The revision surgery risk was evaluated using postoperative factors including a deep flexion capability (> 135̊), and postoperative mechanical alignments.

RESULTS

Overall survivorship was significantly lower in the youngest groups than other groups (Log-rank test, p=0.001). The cumulative 20-year implant longevity was more than 95% in the two oldest groups, but less than 60% in the youngest group. It was notable that the post-TKA implant longevity was not apparent up to 10 years between the age groups (p=0.073∼0.458). Aseptic loosening was observed with an earlier onset (3.1 to 18.9 years) trend than PE wear (9.8∼17.9 years), with most cases arising in the youngest groups. Flexion limitation and varus alignment were significant risks to aseptic loosening and PE wear (Cox proportional hazard regression: p=0.001 and 0.045, respectively).

DISCUSSION

A younger age (< 60 years), inability of postoperative deep flexion, and varus alignment were significant risk factors for aseptic loosening and PE wear after modern PS design in this Asian cohort. The difference in postoperative longevity affected by these factors was not obvious during the first 10 years but emerged over a second decade.

LEVEL OF PROOF

III; retrospective cohort study.

Patellar medial-lateral position can be used to correct the effect of leg rotation on preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty for varus knees

BACKGROUND

Lower limb malrotations can be observed in long leg radiographs, affecting the measurement of the angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes. The purposes were to analyze the effect of limb rotation and to evaluate the accuracy of the corrected angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes based on the patellar ML position.

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis was that the correction of the angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes according to the patellar ML position can reduce the error from the angle in the true AP view in most of the knees.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive knees with varus deformity undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were included. Computed tomography images were digitally reconstructed in the neutral position, and internally and externally rotated at 10° and 20°, respectively. The patellar ML position relative to the medial (0%) and lateral (100%) epicondyles and the angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur were measured. The corrected angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes was calculated using the averaged translational ratio.

RESULTS

In the neutral position, the patellar center position was 56.1% (standard deviation [SD]=4.7%), which was 31.4% (SD=7.2%) and 80.2% (SD=5.4%) in the 20° internal and external rotation, respectively. The angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes was 2.6° (SD=2.0°) and 8.1° (SD=2.1°) in the 20° internal and external rotation, respectively. On average, if the patellar center shifted 10%, the change of the angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur was 1.13°. Applying the corrected angle, a discrepancy from the neutral position decreased.

CONCLUSION

The method to correct the angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes according to the patellar ML position can be used to reduce the measurement error for preoperative planning using a long leg radiograph.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a review

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment has recently become a hot topic in the orthopedics arthroplasty literature. Coronal plane alignment especially has gained increasing attention since it is considered a cornerstone for improved clinical outcomes. Various alignment techniques have been described, but none proved to be optimal and there is a lack of general consensus on which alignment provides best results. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the different types of coronal alignments in TKA, correctly defining the main principles and terms.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Inversed Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty by Asia Specific (Huang’s) Phenotypes, a Prospective Pilot Study

Inverse restricted kinematic alignment (irKA) was modified from restricted kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This prospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of irKA-TKA on all knee subtypes classified by Asia specific (Huang’s) phenotypes. A total of 96 knees that underwent irKA-TKA at one hospital between January 2018 and June 2020 were included, with 15 knees classified in Type 1, nine in Type 2, 15 in Type 3, 47 in Type 4, and 10 in Type 5 by Huang’s phenotypes. Outcomes were knee alignment measures and patient-reported satisfaction evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and traditional Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Follow-up was one year. Type 4 knee was most significantly corrected in all angles by irKA-TKA, followed by Type 2 and 3 knees. Type 5 and 1 knee were only significantly corrected in some angles. The correlation between FJS-12 and WOMAC was good at 6 months (Pearson correlation coefficient (r) = 0.74) and moderate at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months during follow-up (r = 0.37~0.47). FJS-12 and WOMAC displayed comparable hip–knee–ankle angle cut-off value (4.71° vs. 6.20°), sensitivity (70.49% vs. 67.19%), specificity (84.00% vs. 85.71%), and Youden index (54.49% vs. 52.90%) in prediction of good prognosis. In conclusion, irKA-TKA corrects knee alignment in all knee types with increasing satisfaction for one-year follow-up. Knees with presurgical varus deformity are most recommended for irKA-TKA. Both presurgical scores of the traditional Chinese version of FJS-12 and WOMAC predict the prognosis of irKA-TKA.

Outcomes of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity

BACKGROUND

Varus deformity is common in osteoarthritic knee. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes after cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for severely varus osteoarthritic knees and compare them to those of mildly to moderately deformed osteoarthritic knees.

METHODS

Eight hundred ninety-four subjects were undergone CR TKA, 137 had severe varus deformity (group 1), and 757 had mild-to-moderate deformity (group 2) of the lower limb preoperatively. Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared between two groups clinically and radiographically.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up period was 54.7 ± 28.9 months. Mean age was 77.8 ± 6.7 years in group 1 and 74.5 ± 7.4 years in group 2 (p < 0.001). Preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was - 17.7°±2.9° in group 1 and - 6.3° ± 5.1° in group 2 (p < 0.001). Preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 127.7° ± 15.2° in group 1 and 130.8 °± 9.6° in group 2 (p = 0.019). Preoperative Knee Society scores and WOMAC score were not significantly different between two groups. Postoperative HKAA was - 0.4° ± 2.3° in group 1 and 0.6 ° ± 2.0° in group 2 (p < 0.001). Postoperative ROM, Knee Society scores, and WOMAC score were not significantly different between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CR TKA showed results in subjects with severe varus deformities comparable to those without severe varus deformities. Whether the degree of preoperative varus deformity of the lower limb should be considered when deciding to perform CR-type or PS-type TKA requires further discussion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Surgical Transepicondylar Axis Is Not a Reliable Reference when there Was Lateral Femoral Bowing

OBJECTIVE

The surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is believed to be a consistent reference for femoral rotation axis, and the reliability of its orientation seriously affects the accuracy and outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study was designed to investigate the relationship between the orientation of sTEA and femoral bowing angle (FBA) and posterior condylar line (PCL) using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) reconstruction models to verify its reliability.

METHODS

This study retrospectively collected lower extremity images of 443 southern Chinese osteoarthritic patients (347 women, 96 men; 234 left, 209 right; mean age 66.5 ± 9.3 years) from August 2016 to June 2018. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured on anteroposterior weight-bearing full lower extremity standing radiographs. Measurements on 3D CT models of the femurs included lateral angle between the femoral mechanical axis and sTEA coronal angle, angle between sTEA and distal joint line (distal condylar axis angle, DCA); angle between sTEA and PCL (sTEA axial angle); angle between anatomical axis of proximal femur and anatomical axis of distal femur in the plane they form (actual FBA) and its projection on the coronal (lateral FBA) and sagittal (anterior FBA) planes. The correlations between sTEA coronal angle, sTEA axial angle and actual FBA, lateral FBA, anterior FBA, HKA, DCA were explored using the Spearman correlation test.

RESULTS

The mean value of actual FBA is (14.4 ± 3.6)°, of lateral FBA is (6.0 ± 4.0)°, and of anterior FBA is (12.7 ± 3.0)°. The mean value of sTEA coronal angle is (88.7 ± 3.6)°, of sTEA axial angle is (2.1 ± 2.8)°. The sTEA coronal angle was positively correlated with actual FBA (r = 0.320, P < 0.01), lateral FBA (r = 0.448, P < 0.01), anterior FBA (r = 0.113, P < 0.05), HKA (r = 0.482, P < 0.01) and DCA (r = 0.486, P < 0.01). The sTEA axial angle was positively correlated with DCA (r = 0.168, P < 0.01), but not significantly correlated with all FBAs and HKA (NS).

CONCLUSION

The sTEA cannot be used as a stable reference when there was an obvious femoral bowing deformity. As the lateral femoral bowing increases, the orientation of sTEA becomes more varus, no matter the knee is varus or valgus.

Accuracy of the Tibial Component Alignment by Extramedullary System Using Simple Radiographic References in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background and Objectives: The tibial component alignment is an important issue for the longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to investigate the usefulness of proximal tibial references determined by pre-operative radiography and intraoperative C-arm-guided hip and ankle center marking for the extramedullary guided tibial cut in mild (<10°) and severe (≥10°) varus knee TKA. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 consecutive patients (220 cases) who underwent total knee arthroplasty who were recruited from July 2011 to April 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Before surgery, the proximal tibial reference point and medio-lateral cut thickness difference were identified. Then, hip and ankle centers were checked using a C-arm intensifier intraoperatively. The hip−knee−ankle (HKA) alignment and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively. More than 3° varus or valgus of HKA alignment or tibial component angle was defined as an outlier. Results: Mean follow-up duration was 26.9 months. Among 220 cases, 111 cases are classified as mild varus group and 109 cases are classified as severe varus group. The HKA alignment is significantly improved (p < 0.001). The average tibial component angle after surgery is 90.1°. A total of 21 cases (9.5%) and 3 cases (1.4%) are classified as outliers of HKA alignment and MPTA, respectively. Among MPTA outliers, one case is in the mild varus group and two cases are in the in severe varus group (p = 0.62). Conclusion: Measurement of proximal tibial radiographic references and checking the C-arm-guided intraoperative hip and ankle center could be helpful to obtain the favorable coronal position of the tibial component in the extramedullary guided tibial cut.

Coronal knee alignment measurements differ on long-standing radiographs vs. by navigation

BACKGROUND

The long-standing radiograph (LSR) is the reference tool for assessing knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, its value is debatable, as many factors can influence measurement accuracy. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) provides accurate measurements. Few studies have compared LSR and computer-assisted measurements of knee alignment. The objective of this study was to compare hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle values obtained before and after TKA on LSRs to those obtained during CAS.

HYPOTHESIS

The HKA angle values measured on LSRs before and after surgery are identical to those measured during CAS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The HKA angles of 126 knees were measured on bipedal full-weight-bearing LSRs obtained before and 3 months after TKA. The results were compared to the values obtained during CAS.

RESULTS

Before surgery, the standard deviation was 2.672, with limits of agreement of {-5.391; + 5.082}. The intra-class coefficients were good for the overall measurements (0.9), good for detecting>10° varus (0.89), fair for<10° varus and valgus (0.66 and 0.71, respectively), poor for>10° valgus (0.43) and poor for normal alignment (0). Post-operatively, the standard deviation was 3.113, with limits of agreement of {-6.426; +5.776}. The intra-class coefficient was poor for the overall measurements (0.20), negative for normal alignment (-0.05) and<10° valgus (-0.05), and positive for<10° varus (0.017) and for>10° varus and valgus (0.33).

CONCLUSION

Before TKA, the LSR overestimates the deformity compared to CAS. After surgery, the two methods are not comparable. These findings underline the relevance of routinely obtaining LSRs and for using LSR results to estimate costs for healthcare insurance reimbursement purposes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective observational cohort study.

Seven phenotypes of varus osteoarthritic knees can be identified in the coronal plane

PURPOSE

Recommendations for resecting distal femur and proximal tibia in mechanical and anatomical alignment techniques are standardized. Kinematic alignment propagates individualizing resection planes. Whether significant variation exists, to warrant departure from standardized resection planes, has not been shown thus far in a large cohort of knees and with a wide range of varus deformity. The null hypothesis of this study was that there was no phenotypic variation in varus osteoarthritic knees. The aim of this paper was to determine whether distinct phenotypes could be identified, based on variations in coronal femoral and tibial morphology, which could aid in surgical planning and categorizing varus knees for future studies.

METHODS

2129 full-leg weightbearing radiographs were analyzed (1704 preoperative; 425 of contralateral arthritic knee). Measurements made were of HKA (hip-knee-ankle angle), VCA (valgus correction angle), mLDFA (lateral mechanical distal femoral angle), aLDFA (lateral anatomical distal femoral angle), MPTA (medial proximal tibial angle), MNSA (medial neck shaft angle), TAMA (angle between tibial mechanical and anatomical axes), and TPDR (percentage length of tibia proximal to extra-articular deformity).

RESULTS

Seven distinct types were identified covering 2021 knees, reducible to 4 broad phenotypes: 11% were Type 1 'Neutral' knees showing values close to reported normal knees (mean VCA 5.5°, mLDFA 87°, aLDFA 81°). 38% were Type 2 'Intra-articular varus' with medial intra-articular bone loss (mean mLDFA 90.9°, MPTA 85.4°, VCA of 5.7°). 41% were Type 3 'Extra-articular varus' with extra-articular deformity (EAD). Type 3a had proximal tibial EAD; Type 3b had tibial diaphyseal EAD; Type 3c had femoral EAD (mean VCA 8.7°, HKA 166°), and severe medial bone loss (mean mLDFA 92°, MPTA 83°). 9% were Type 4 'Valgoid type' with features of valgus knees: Type 4a had medial femoral bowing (mean VCA 2.9°); Type 4b had significant distal femoral valgus (mean mLDFA 85.3°, aLDFA 78.6°).

CONCLUSIONS

The null hypothesis that there was no phenotypic variation in varus osteoarthritic knees was rejected as considerable variation was found in coronal morphology of femur and tibia. Four broad phenotypic groups could be identified. Plane of the knee joint articular surface was quite variable. This has relevance to planning and performance of corrective osteotomies, unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Patient-specific instrumentation makes sense in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery was initially developed to increase accuracy. The potential PSI benefits have expanded in the last decade, and other advantages have been published. However, different authors are critical of PSI and argue that the advantages are not such and do not compensate for the extra cost. This article aims to describe the recently published advantages and disadvantages of PSI.

AREAS COVERED

Narrative description of the latest publications related to PSI in accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, efficiency, and other benefits.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

We have published high accuracy of the system, with a not clinically relevant loss of accuracy, significantly higher precision with PSI than with conventional instruments, and a high percentage of cases in the optimal range and similar to that obtained with computer-assisted navigation, greater imprecision for tibial slope, a significant blood loss reduction, and time consumption, an acceptable and non-significant increase in the cost per procedure and no difference in complications during hospital admission and at 90 days. We think that PSI will not follow the Scott Parabola and that it will continue to be a valuable type of device in some instances of TKA surgery.

Variable rotation of the femur does not affect outcome with patient specific alignment navigated balanced TKA

PURPOSE

Excessive internal and external rotation of the femoral component has been associated with poor outcome with a measured-resection neutral mechanical alignment TKA. This technique assumes that every tibia is in 3° of varus so the femoral component is placed in 3° of external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis to enable a balanced flexion gap. This is not the case as there is wide variability in the bony anatomy and soft tissue envelope of the knee so flexion imbalance may occur. A patient-specific alignment navigated balanced TKA technique was performed whereby the tibia is cut anatomically up to 3° of varus, then a ligament tensor is used to determine the optimal femoral component position for a balanced TKA. This results in variable femoral rotation. The hypothesis is that matching the femoral component rotation to the patient's anatomic tibial cut and soft tissue envelope will not affect clinical outcome METHODS: In a single surgeon series 287 consecutive varus aligned TKA's were performed using this technique with an Attune cruciate retaining fixed bearing TKA with an anatomic patella resurfacing. The angle between the posterior femoral cuts and the posterior condylar axis was collected using Brainlab software. Functional scores were collected prospectively preoperatively and at two years. The variable femoral component rotation was correlated with and compared with the functional outcome scores.

RESULTS

The femoral rotation varied from 7° of internal rotation to 8°of external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis. The mean rotation was 1.1° of external rotation. There was no significant difference in the Oxford score, WOMAC score, Forgotten Knee Score, KOOS Joint Replacement score or Patient Satisfaction in respect to the variable femoral rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis.

CONCLUSION

When a more anatomic-balanced TKA technique is used variable femoral rotation will not affect clinical outcome at two years LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II Prospective Cohort Study.

Comparison of Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty Involving Postoperative Neutral or Residual Mild Varus Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Comparing mainly clinical and functional outcomes as well as prosthesis survival with neutral and residual mild varus alignment, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases from 1 January 1974 to 18 December 2020 to identify studies comparing clinical and functional outcomes as well as prosthesis survival in the presence of different alignments after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for varus knees. The included studies were assessed by two researchers according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Postoperative neutral alignment (0° ± 3°) was compared to residual mild varus (3°–6°) and residual severe varus (>6°). Meta‐analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. The odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were used to compare dichotomous and continuous variables. The fixed‐effect model and random‐effect model were used to meta‐analyze the data. Nine studies were included in the meta‐analysis with 1410 cases of postoperative neutral alignment, 564 of residual mild varus alignment and 175 of residual severe varus alignment following TKA, all of which were published after 2013. Three studies scored 7 points on the NOS, while the remaining studies scored 8 points, suggesting high quality. The pooled mean differences (MDs) of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were 1.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) −1.06 to 3.20; P = 0.32; I² = 79%]. The meta‐analysis showed that neutral alignment and mild varus alignment were associated with similar the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Knee Score (KS‐KS), and Knee Society Function Score (KS‐FS), while neutral alignment was associated with lower Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) [mean difference −6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) −9.37 to −2.64, P = 0.0005]. Neutral alignment was associated with higher KS‐KS than severe alignment (M 2.98, 95% CI 1.42 to 4.55, P = 0.0002; I² = 0%) as well as higher KS‐FS (M 8.20, 95% CI 4.58 to 11.82, P < 0.00001; I² = 0%). Neutral alignment was associated with similar rate of survival as mild varus alignment (95% CI 0.36 to 9.10; P = 0.48; I² = 65%) or severe varus alignment (95% CI 0.94 to 37.90; P = 0.06; I² = 61%). There was no statistical difference in others. Residual mild varus alignment after TKA may lead to similar or superior outcomes than neutral alignment in patients with preoperative varus knees, yet the available evidence appears to be insufficient to replace the current gold standard of neutral alignment. Severe varus alignment should be avoided.

Navigated total knee arthroplasty: Retrospective study of 600 continuous cases

INTRODUCTION

Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has existed for more than 20 years, although its use has been marginal. Its benefits are still largely debated, especially its efficacy for achieving the desired postoperative alignment.

HYPOTHESIS

A neutral hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle (180°±3°) will be achieved in at least 85% of cases and there will be no difference between the different types of navigation systems used.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center, single-surgeon study, all the TKAs completed between September 2003 and December 2017 were included, giving a total of 753 navigated TKAs: Navitrack group: 196 Natural Knee II implants (Zimmer) with the Navitrack-OS Knee system (Zimmer CAS); Brainlab group: 557 implants (196 Profix, Smith & Nephew and 361 LCS, DePuy) with the Brainlab Vector Vision system. The aim of navigation was independent of the preoperative alignment and was always to achieve a neutral HKA mechanical axis (180°±3°). The primary endpoint was the postoperative HKA angle. This parameter was used to determine whether the navigation objective was achieved, to define how many patients were outliers and to compare navigation systems to each other. The potential influence of sex, body mass index (BMI) and preoperative deformity were secondary aims. Lastly, the final navigation values were compared to radiological data to detect any potential deviations.

RESULTS

We analyzed 600 of the cases, 160 in the Navitrack group and 440 in the Brainlab group (152 Profix and 288 LCS). A neutral HKA angle was found in 91% patients: 93% for the Navitrack group and 90% in the Brainlab group (90.8% Profix and 89.6% LCS). There was no significant difference between groups (p=0.68), nor between subgroups (p=0.85). An elevated BMI negatively influenced the ability to achieve a neutral HKA (p=0.015), regardless of the system used.

CONCLUSION

In our study of 600 TKA cases done with navigation, the postoperative alignment goal (HKA 180°±3°) was achieved in 91% of cases. There was no difference between navigation systems. Patients with a high BMI were more likely to be outliers (p=0.015).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5d poorly predict patient's satisfaction following mechanically aligned total knee replacement: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is increasingly used to measure the success of arthroplasty. Satisfaction with the outcome of a total knee replacement (TKR) is traditionally thought to be associated with improvements in functional status and quality of life measures. This study aims to answer the following questions: 1. What is the level of patient satisfaction, improvement in knee function and patient quality of life associated with mechanically aligned TKR? 2. What is the relationship between OKS, EQ-5d scores and 'outcome satisfaction'?

HYPOTHESIS

TKR is associated with a significant improvement in function, satisfaction and quality of life and that there is a strong correlation between OKS, EQ-5d and 'outcome satisfaction'.

METHOD

Five thousand eight hundred and ninety six patients underwent primary TKR between January 2010 and December 2017 and had complete preoperative and 2-year follow-up data for OKS, EQ-5d and satisfaction scores. Outcomes data were collected prospectively and recorded on our institutional database. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were calculated for OKS and EQ-5d, the association between OKS, EQ-5d and 'outcome satisfaction' was measured using regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median 2-year 'outcome satisfaction' score was 90/100 with 79% of patients reporting excellent satisfaction (≥80/100) and 93.4% of patients satisfied (≥50/100). Postoperatively, median scores were 39 for OKS and 0.8 for EQ-5d. The mean increase in scores was 15.85 for OKS and 0.32 for EQ-5d. Satisfaction showed moderate positive correlation with postoperative OKS (r=0.69) and EQ-5D (0.58) scores, but weaker correlation with the change in OKS (r=0.57) and EQ-5d (r=0.32) scores from preoperative levels.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Mechanically aligned TKR is overall a successful operation responsible of fair rate of patient satisfaction. OKS and EQ-5d are imperfect predictors for satisfaction as they are significantly influenced by patients' comorbidities. This should be taken into account when evaluating the success of an operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IIc; observational study (based on prospectively collected data from an institutional registry).

Postoperative alignment but not femoral coronal bowing is a significant longevity factor after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Femoral coronal bowing (FCB) has been reported to be a risk factor for mechanical malalignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the effects of FCB on the long-term survivorship (when postoperative mechanical alignment (MA) is neutral after TKA) have not been determined.

HYPOTHESIS

The effects of FCB on the cumulative survivorship after TKA may be significantly smaller compared with those of MA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive 328 knees of 211 patients (10 males, 201 females) who underwent TKA between 1995 and 2009 (mean age of 64.2±6.7 years at the time of TKA, mean follow-up period of 11.9±2.5 years) were retrospectively evaluated. FCB and MA were evaluated using preoperative and immediate postoperative whole-leg anteroposterior radiographs, respectively. The patients were grouped according to FCB and postoperative MA, which included group A (FCB≤5°, MA≤3°), B (FCB>5°, MA≤3°), C (FCB>5°, MA>3°), and D (FCB≤5°, MA>3°). Primary end-point was defined as aseptic mechanical failures requiring revision TKA. Survivorship was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Factors associated with the risk of aseptic mechanical failures were analyzed by Cox regression analysis. Preoperative and final follow-up clinical outcomes were assessed using Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores.

RESULTS

Group A, B, C, and D included 190, 73, 40, and 25 knees, respectively. The 10-year survivorship was similar between group A and B (96.3±1.4% vs. 98.6±1.4%; p=0.733) and group C and D (87.3±5.3 vs. 87.6±6.7%; p=0.974); however, it was significantly higher in group B than in group C (p=0.036) and in group A than in group D (p=0.005). Age (OR=0.991; 95% CI 0.906-1.085; p=0.002) and MA>3° (OR=3.645; 95% CI 1.744-7.604; p=0.001) were associated with the risk of aseptic mechanical failures. The mean preoperative and final HSS scores in the four groups were not significantly different.

DISCUSSION

Marked FCB was not associated with long-term survivorship for knees with neutral alignment after TKA. However, non-neutral postoperative alignment reduced long-term survivorship for knees with marked FCB.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective comparative cohort study.