Femoral stem modularity

Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of risk factors and preventive options

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful elective operations in orthopedic surgery for improving pain and functional disability in patients with end-stage joint disease. However, dislocation continues to be a troublesome complication after THA, as it is a leading cause of revision and is associated with substantial social, health, and economic costs. It is a relatively rare, usually early occurrence that depends on both the patients' characteristics and the surgical aspects. The most recent and important finding is the special attention to be given preoperatively to spinopelvic mobility, which is closely related to the incidence of dislocation. Consequently, clinical and radiographic assessment of the lumbar spine is mandatory to identify an altered pelvic tilt that could suggest a different positioning of the cup. Lumbar spinal fusion is currently considered a risk factor for dislocation and revision regardless of whether it is performed prior to or after THA. Surgical options for its treatment and prevention include the use of prostheses with large diameter of femoral head size, dual mobility constructs, constrained liners, and modular neck stems.

Femoral revision in total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular stem: clinical and radiological results with a 8-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Modular femoral components allow for patient-specific restoration of hip joint geometry and the reconstruction of extensive bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, potential problems of modular implants such as taper corrosion and the risk of implant fracture continue to be of concern. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a cementless modular revision stem following revision surgery due to aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture and to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in these patients at mid-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, a consecutive cohort of 75 patients who underwent primary revision THA at our institution using a modular cementless stem design (MRP-TITAN stem) was retrospectively evaluated at a mean follow-up of 7.7 years. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed with revision of the femoral component for any reason as the end point. The Harris-Hip Score, the UCLA Activity Score, the Forgotten Joint Score and the SF-12 Score were used for clinical assessment. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to compare pre- and postoperative clinical scores.

RESULTS

Overall stem survival with the endpoint stem re-revision for any reason was 85.4% at a mean follow-up of 7.7 years (range 2.4-14 years). Stem survival was 89.5% in the aseptic loosening group and 78.3% in the periprosthetic fracture group with no statistically significant difference between both groups (p = 0.107). One patient had to be revised due to taper fracture. PROMs improved significantly up to the latest follow-up, and radiographic evaluation showed full osseointegration of all stems in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision THA using a modular cementless titanium revision stem demonstrated adequate clinical and radiological results at mid- to long-term follow-up in this cohort. Cementless revision stems are a useful treatment option to restore the anatomy, especially in deformed hips and in complex revision hip arthroplasty. However, there are some significant disadvantages related to an increased risk of mechanical failure such as corrosion/fretting damage and implant fracture. Future high-quality prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to confirm the supposed advantages.

Is taper corrosion in modular revision hip stem junctions associated with patient or implant specific factors? A retrieval analysis

Implant modularity within revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers multiple implant configurations and allows surgeons a high intraoperative flexibility to restore functionality to the patients joint, even in complex revision cases. However, a rare but devastating complication for patients, clinicians and manufacturers presenting a breakage of the taper junction between the distal stem and the proximal implant part. Aside from implant and patient specific risk factors, corrosion and fretting at the stem junctions have been associated with taper failure. Whether corrosive processes are a precursor of failure or rather an accompaniment of material fatigue is thereby still unclear. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the incidence of taper corrosion in a collection of 17 retrievals from a single type (MRP-Titan, Peter Brehm GmbH) and on the correlation of taper corrosion to implant and patient specific factors. None of the implants was revised for problems related to the taper junction, corrosion or the implant itself. The modular stem junction of all retrievals was visually rated with respect to corrosion, fretting and surface contamination. Additionally, the stability of taper junctions of retrievals where the proximal part with the neck was still assembled to the stem was determined by measuring the loosening moment of the securing screw and the push-out-force for taper dissociation. There was no difference between the mean push-out-force of the retrievals (14 kN ± 1.2 kN) and new reference samples (12.6 kN ± 0.5 kN). Approximately one third of the investigated retrievals showed considerable taper corrosion. The extent of corrosion increased with time in vivo and contamination of the neck piece, while it decreased with the loosening moment of the locking screw. The parameters femoral head offset, neck piece length, lateralized neck pieces, obesity of patients and septic/aseptic revision were not correlated to taper corrosion. Taper corrosion seems to occur regularly in modular taper junctions and is not necessarily connected to taper failure. A correct assembly of the junction and avoiding taper surface contamination during revision surgery is mandatory.

Single-taper conical tapered stem in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip: A long-term evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Conical tapered stems may be useful implants to manage the reconstruction of complex dysplastic anatomies. The aims of this paper were to assess: 1) the preoperative CT features of the dysplastic femurs; 2) survival rates, complications and reasons for revision; 3) the clinical outcomes; 4) the radiographic outcomes of single-taper conical stems in dysplasia (defined as center edge angle < 20°) at a long-term follow-up.

HYPOTHESIS

Monoblock conical stem provides a 10-year survival rate of at least 95%, with excellent clinical outcomes and bony ingrowth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 100 THAs in 85 patients (15 bilateral cases) were enrolled. The average age of the patients at surgery was 50.9±11.5 years. Assessment of the native femoral morphology was performed using CT-scan, coronal (neck-shaft angle, offset, center of rotation position) and axial parameters (anteversion, mediolateral and anteroposterior femoral diameters). Clinical (HHS score) and radiological (osseointegration, subsidence and offset reconstruction) outcomes were evaluated at the last available follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 9.34±5.61 years. Severely distorted anatomies from Crowe I to Crowe IV were included, with a mean canal flare of 4.3 and a mean femoral antetorsion of 34°. The survival rates were stable at long-term (98.9% at 10 and 15 years): no aseptic loosening occurred. The mean postoperative HHS was 89.8±6.8 points. Ninety-nine percent of the stems showed bone ingrowth, from 6 months to the last available follow-up. Subsidence occurred in 18% of the cases (mean value: 2.5mm, range: 1-6mm) in the first month, with subsequent stabilization. A mild proximal stress shielding occurred in 28% of the THAs. Radiolucent lines were detected in the 8% of the cases. There was a postoperative loss of offset in 12% of the cases.

DISCUSSION

Conical stems in dysplastic hips achieved bony ingrowth at long-term outcome, even in complex anatomies. Subsidence, proximal stress shielding and imperfect offset restoration may occur with this implant.

LEVEL OF PROOF

IV; retrospective study.

Survival and complications at a minimum 5years' follow-up of the modular Mark-2 Extreme™ cementless femoral stem: Does the reduced modularity resolve the mechanical issues of the Mark-I stem?

INTRODUCTION

The Extreme™ modular stem was developed for implant revision with metaphyseal-diaphyseal defect. Due to the high breakage rate, a new "reduced modularity" design has been introduced, but without reported results. We therefore conducted a retrospective assessment of (1) overall stem survival, (2) functional results, (3) osseointegration, and (4) the rate of complications, and notably of mechanical failure.

HYPOTHESIS

Reduced modularity reduces the risk of revision surgery for mechanical failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five prostheses were implanted between January 2007 and December 2010 in 42 patients with severe bone defect (Paprosky≥III) or periprosthetic shaft fracture. Mean age was 69.6years (range: 44-91years). Minimum follow-up was 5years, for a mean 115.4months (range: 60-156months). The main study endpoint was femoral stem survival, counting all-cause explantation as event. Functional assessment comprised subjective rating of satisfaction, Postel Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) and Harris Hip scores, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Whether the revision assembly was carried out in situ, in the patient's hip, or outside, on the operating table, was not known in 2 cases; in the other 43, assembly was in situ in 15 cases (35%) and on the operating table in 28 (65%).

RESULTS

Five-year stem survival was 75.7% (95% CI: 61.9-89.5%), taking all causes of change together. Seventeen patients (45.9%) had complications, 13 (35.1%) requiring revision surgery, including 10 (27.0%) for stem replacement. Five patients (13.5%) had steam breakage at the junction between the metaphysis and the diaphyseal stem, 4 of which occurred within 2 years of implantation or of fixation of a periprosthetic fracture. Mean preoperative Harris score was 48.4 [IQR (25-75% interquartile range): 37-58] and PMA score 11.1 (IQR: 10-12), compared to respectively 74 (IQR: 67-89) and 13.6 (IQR: 12.5-16) at follow-up. Mean FJS at follow-up was 71.5 (IQR: 61-94.5). In the 15 in situ assemblies, there were 3 breakages (20%), compared to 2 (7.1%) in the 28 table assemblies (p=0.21).

DISCUSSION

The stem breakage rate was high despite the reduced modularity, which concentrated all stress on a single junction but without reducing the risk of mechanical failure. Surgical technique was faulty in some cases, with in situ assembly of the metaphysis after implanting the diaphyseal stem, which does not respect the manufacturer's recommendations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Bimodular femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

This review critically examines the efficacy of dual-modular stems in primary total hip arthroplasty. Given the variability and non-comparability of certain femoral stem designs and stem-neck couplings, with some even being withdrawn from the market, this review offers an in-depth analysis of predominant implant performances.

AREAS COVERED

The paper explores a brief historical summary related to dual-modular stems, including the complications associated with their use, diagnostic tools for evaluation, analysis of both recalled and currently available models, as well as alternative therapeutic options. This information is pertinent for both clinical and research domains.

EXPERT OPINION

While dual-modular systems were initially touted to offer several advantages, the evidence substantiating these benefits has been ambiguous. Further, these systems introduce the risk of alternative complications. In specific cases involving patients with developmental hip dysplasia and certain proximal femoral deformities requiring complex reconstructions, dual-modular systems might be relevant. Nonetheless, the use of long interchangeable necks in patients with a body mass index above 30 kg/m2 is discouraged, and pairing a long varus-oriented neck with an extra-long femoral head should be avoided in all patients.

A New Classification System for Cementless Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The growing variety of total hip arthroplasty implants necessitates a standardized, simple, and brand-neutral language to precisely classify femoral components. Although previous classifications have been useful, they need updating to include stems that have current surface treatment technologies, modularity, collar features, and other geometric characteristics.

METHODS

To accomplish this, we propose a new classification system for stems based on 3 distinguishing stem features: (1) geometry, (2) location of modularity, and (3) length.

RESULTS

Our system allows for the easy classification of all currently used stem types.

CONCLUSIONS

One goal of this endeavor is to improve clinical record keeping to facilitate study comparisons as well as literature reviews.

Trunnions and Modularity in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Historical Review With Current Clinical Implications

Trunnion in total hip arthroplasty refers to the interface between the neck of a femoral stem and the femoral head. Clinical complications arising from damage to this junction, whether it be due to mechanical wear, corrosion, or a combination, are referred to as mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC), also commonly known as trunnionosis. With the use of modular hip prostheses, which help customize offset and leg length to an individual patient's anatomy, the incidence of MACC and revision due to MACC has increased in recent years. Although the cause of MACC is multifactorial, with patient factors and technique factors contributing to this condition, taper design and geometry, metallurgical properties of implants, and size mismatch of the bearing couple are some of the implant factors that have also been implicated in this clinical phenomenon. Understanding the history of taper design and geometry, the track record of older implants, and the rationale behind the development of current prostheses can help surgeons choose the right implants for their patients and accurately assess the pros and cons of new implants being introduced to the market each year.

Dual-Modular Versus Single-Modular Stems for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Survival Analysis

Background and Objectives: Increased revision rate of dual-modular (DM) femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of modular-neck breakage and adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) to additional junction damage products is well established and some designs have been recalled from the market. However, some long-term studies of specific DM stems did not confirm the inferiority of these stems compared to standard single-modular (SM) stems, and a head-to-head comparison THA is missing. The objectives of this multicentre study were to determine the survivorship and complication rates of a common DM stem design compared to a similar SM stem. Materials and Methods: In a time frame from January 2012 to November 2015, a cohort of 807 patients (882 hips) consecutively underwent primary cementless THAs at two orthopaedic centres. 377 hips were treated with a Zweimüller-type DM stem THA system and 505 hips with a similar SM stem THA system, both including a modern press-fit acetabulum. Kaplan-Meier survivorship and complication rates were compared between both groups in a median follow-up of 9.0 years (maximum, 9.9 years). Results: The 9-year survivorship of the DM stem THA system (92.6%, 95% CI 89.9-95.3) was significantly lower than that of the SM stem THA system (97.0%, 95% CI 95.2-98.8). There were no differences in revision rates for septic loosening, dislocation, and periprosthetic fractures between the two groups. One ceramic inlay and one Ti-alloy modular neck breakage occurred in the DM stem THA system group, but the main reason for revision in this group was aseptic loosening of components. Conclusions: The survivorship of the DM stem THA system was lower than the similar SM stem THA system in a comparable clinical environment with long-term follow-up. Our results confirmed that no rationale for stem modularity exists in primary THAs.

Implant loosening following THA with S-ROM prosthesis and subtrochanteric osteotomy: Three case reports

Prosthesis loosening after THA is a rather common complication. For DDH patients with Crowe IV, the surgical risk and complexity is significant. THA with S-ROM prosthesis combined with subtrochanteric osteotomy is a common treatment. However, loosening of a modular femoral prosthesis (S-rom) is uncommon in THA and has a very low incidence. With modular prostheses distal prosthesis looseness are rarely reported. Non-union osteotomy is a common complication of subtrochanteric osteotomy. We report three patients with Crowe IV DDH who developed prosthesis loosening following THA with an S-ROM prosthesis and subtrochanteric osteotomy. We addressed the management of these patients and prosthesis loosening as likely underlying causes.

A novel method to improve femoral head and stem taper stability intraoperatively in total hip arthroplasty - a proof of concept study

BACKGROUND

Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) has been associated with the compromised durability and fixation of modular total hip implants, adverse reaction of local tissue, and other undesirable clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). MACC is primarily caused by the relative motion between the femoral head and stem. To minimize the relative motion the taper connection between the two components must be strong enough. The current study addressed the following questions: (1) Does increasing the mass of the femoral stem improve the taper connection strength intraoperatively? (2) Does increasing the mass of the femoral stem reduce the risk of periprosthetic tissue damage intraoperatively?

HYPOTHESIS

Increasing the mass of the femoral stem improve the taper connection strength intraoperatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the experiment, femoral heads were impacted onto the stem tapers with and without an additional weight attached to the stem. The femoral heads were then pulled off to investigate the strength of the taper connection. The stem displacement and acceleration at impaction were also measured to evaluate the risk of periprosthetic tissue damage.

RESULTS

The results showed that the pull-off force was increased by 24% (p=0.011, n=6) when an additional weight was attached to the stem. The additional weight also reduced the maximum stem acceleration and maximum stem displacement by 37% (p<0.001, n=6) and 14% (p=0.094, n=6), respectively.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest that the femoral head and stem taper connection strength can be significantly improved and the risk of periprosthetic tissue damage significantly reduced intraoperatively by attaching an additional weight to the stem to increase its mass.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, comparative in vitro mechanical investigation.

Fully hydroxyapatite-coated distal locking cementless femoral modular implant for revision total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study of 94 Renaissance™ stems at a minimum 10 years' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Modular locking revision total hip arthroplasty femoral implants have been little assessed over the long term. We therefore conducted a retrospective assessment of the Renaissance™ fully hydroxyapatite-coated distal locking cementless femoral modular revision implant at a minimum 10 years' follow-up, analyzing: 1) survivorship, 2) complications, 3) radiologic and functional results, and 4) prevalence of thigh pain.

HYPOTHESIS

This implant shows more than 90% 10-year survival.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Between December 2002 and December 2008, 213 implant exchanges were performed in 206 patients, including 97 Renaissance™ stems in 93 patients. Three patients were excluded for missing data. Survival was analyzed for 94 stems in 90 patients at a mean 11.2±3 years' follow-up; radiographic and clinical assessment was performed for 48 stems in 45 patients. The survival criterion was implant fracture and/or femoral stem removal.

RESULTS

Survival was 93.5% at 10 years (95% CI: 86-97) and 91.3% at 15 years (95% CI: 82.9-96). Eight stems (8.5%) were exchanged or removed by last follow-up: 5 for infection (5.3%) and 3 for implant breakage (3.2%). The complications rate was 18.1% (N=17, including the 8 stem revisions): 3 stem exchanges for breakage (3.2%), 9 stem infections (9.6%), 3 dislocations (3.2%), and 2 traumatic greater trochanter fractures (2.1%). For the 45 patients with long-term clinical assessment, the mean Postel Merle d'Aubigné and Harris Hip scores were respectively 15±3 and 80 ±19 at last follow-up. Metaphysis reconstruction was satisfactory in 36/48 cases (75.0%). Seven of the 48 stems (14.6%) assessed at longest follow-up, in 45 patients, were causing thigh pain, unrelated to stress-shielding, distal locking screws or metaphyseal filling index.

DISCUSSION

The Renaissance™ fully hydroxyapatite-coated modular locking stem with curved nail showed 90% 10-year survival, with satisfactory functional results and little thigh pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; case study without control group.

A Modified Modular Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Average 11-year Follow-Up in Cases With Previously Reported 3-year Clinical Results

BACKGROUND

Modular stems require careful follow-up, especially after any design modification. This study investigated the mid- to long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip using the S-ROM-A stem, a modified S-ROM stem for Asians.

METHODS

We previously reported short-term outcomes for all 220 dysplastic hips that underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with the S-ROM-A stem. Here, we followed the clinical and radiological outcomes of 201 of the 220 hips (91%) for a mean 11.4 years postoperatively. We also performed multivariate analysis to determine whether large anteversion angle adjustment was associated with increased osteolysis.

RESULTS

The cumulative survival rate of the stem at 168 months postoperatively was 97.4%. Two hips underwent revision surgery, including 1 due to neck trunnionosis. Characteristic distal stem fracture occurred in 3 hips (1.5%). Most partial radiolucent lines observed around the sleeve early postoperatively disappeared by 7 years, postoperatively. Mild osteolysis occurred relatively frequently (20%), but a multivariate model adjusted for polyethylene type showed no significant association between the occurrence of osteolysis and anteversion adjustment of the modular stem (stem anteversion decreased ≤-20°, P = .829; stem anteversion increased ≥+20°, P = .619).

CONCLUSION

Partial radiolucent lines early postoperatively do not affect long-term outcomes. The clinical benefits of actively adjusting the stem anteversion angle outweigh the mechanical risks. Mild osteolysis, stem fracture, and trunnionosis were relatively frequent complications. Analysis with longer follow-up and more cases are necessary to clearly determine if these complications are associated with the design modification.

Cementless, modular, titanium stem in Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION

The periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a serious complication after primary total hip arthroplasty. We conducted a retrospective study to determine whether the PRIUS^® system presented similar survival to other existing implants for the treatment of Vancouver B2 or B3 PFFs. Bone consolidation rate, functional results and complications were analysed.

METHOD

This is a bi-centric retrospective study between 2012 and 2017 including 39 patients with (B2/B3) PFFs treated by senior surgeons using a PRIUS^® femoral implant. Implant survival, radiological outcome (fracture healing) and clinical scores (Oxford-OHS, Harris Hip Score-HHS, Postel Merle d'Aubigné-PMA, Devane and Charnley) were analysed. 10 patients had died before data collection and 5 patients were lost to follow-up. A total of 21 patients were able to undergo a clinical and radiological evaluation. The mean follow-up period was 3 years.

RESULTS

The 3-year PRIUS^® stem survival rate was 88.6% [95% CI, 77.2-100]. The consolidation rate was 81% (17/21). The rate of satisfied or very satisfied patients was 85.6% (18/21). Regarding the Devane score, activity level was maintained in 70.6% of cases (12/17) and decreased in 29.4% of cases (5/17), the Charnley score was stable in 94% of cases (16/17) and decreased in 6% of cases (1/17). The mean Oxford score was 28.8/48 (9.3; 16-48), the mean HHS was 67/100 (16.4; 46-91) and the mean PMA score was 12.6/18 (4.5; 2-18).

CONCLUSION

The results in terms of survival rate and bone consolidation are comparable to other literature series. The PRIUS® System can be added to the surgical arsenal in the treatment of (B2/B3) PFF, subject to confirmation of these results in the longer term.

Modular neck stems in total hip arthroplasty: current concepts

Modular neck (MN) implants can restore the anatomy, especially in deformed hips such as sequelae of development dysplasia.

Early designs for MN implants had problems with neck fractures and adverse local tissue, so their use was restricted to limited indications.

Results of the latest generation of MN prostheses seem to demonstrate that these problems have been at least mitigated.

Given the results of the studies presented in this review, surgeons might consider MN total hip arthroplasty (THA) for a narrower patient selection when a complex reconstruction is required.

Long MN THA should be avoided in case of body mass index > 30, and should be used with extreme caution in association with high offset femoral necks with long or extra-long heads. Cr-Co necks should be abandoned, in favour of a titanium alloy connection.

Restoring the correct anatomic femoral offset remains a challenge in THA surgeries.

MN implants have been introduced to try to solve this problem. The MN design allows surgeons to choose the appropriate degree and length of the neck for desired stability and range of motion.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:751-758. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200064

Dual Modular Titanium Alloy Femoral Stem Failure Mechanisms and Suggested Clinical Approaches

Titanium (Ti) alloys have been proven to be one of the most suitable materials for orthopaedic implants. Dual modular stems have been introduced to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to enable better control of the femoral offset, leg length, and hip stability. This systematic review highlights information acquired for dual modular Ti stem complications published in the last 12 years and offers a conclusive discussion of the gathered knowledge. Articles referring to dual modular stem usage, survivorship, and complications in English were searched from 2009 to the present day. A qualitative synthesis of literature was carried out, excluding articles referring solely to other types of junctions or problems with cobalt-chromium alloys in detail. In total, 515 records were identified through database searching and 78 journal articles or conference proceedings were found. The reasons for a modular neck fracture of a Ti alloy are multifactorial. Even though dual modular stems have not shown any clinical benefits for patients and have been associated with worse results regarding durability than monolithic stems, some designs are still marketed worldwide. Orthopaedic surgeons should use Ti6Al4V dual modular stem designs for primary THA in special cases only.

Femoral Stem Fracture in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Systematic Literature Review of the Real-World Evidence

Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents as an excellent treatment for the osteoarthritic hip, demonstrating good survival rates. However, aseptic loosening and infection are the main causes of operative revision. The methods used in revision surgery are non-modular or modular THA implants. In addition to the abovementioned revision reasons for THA, this treatment could be associated with the possibility of femoral stem fracture, especially in the modular system. The topic of material failure has been focused on in the public media. The question arises as to how such media reports correlate with the published literature. The observed mentioned number of cases concerning a femoral stem fracture vary between one single case and up to 18.5% within a clinical study, thus presenting an inhomogeneous data situation with a large span. The specific aim of this systematic review is to establish facts and clarify the number of unforeseen events of a femoral stem fracture based on peer review articles and registry data. This clarification is important to us, as these media reports have led to uncertainty among patients.

Methods A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Peer review articles in English and German, presenting original articles, meta-analyses, or case reports, were searched from the turn of the millennium up to December 2019. Only articles that reported a femoral stem component fracture, with content of clinical data as well as register data, were included. Relevant papers published after the defined research time frame were taken into account within the discussion.

Results In total, 218 fractures of a femoral stem (141 primary and 77 revision THA) component could be identified within the selected literature. Most cases of a femoral stem fracture occurred in the modular THA implants compared to the non-modular stems. Regarding revision THA, in summary, 77 implants, presenting 23 non-modular and 54 modular implants, failed by means of femoral stem fracture. A review of 11 National Joint Registries shows a revision rate between 0.04 and 0.05% in only 2 registers according to the specific subject of a femoral stem fracture. For the remaining 9 registers, however, detailed information is lacking and only nonspecific information such as a generic “implant failure” or “other reason” (which can cover a multitude of causes) is supplied.

Conclusion A femoral stem fracture presents a devastating complication for the patient, the surgeon as well as for the manufacturer of the implant. Modular THA implants play an increasingly valuable role concerning restoration of individual anatomy in modern THA revision surgery, especially within complex cases. Regarding revision procedures, data suggests a lower risk of femoral stem fracture for modular implants compared to primary procedures, while the risk of fracture for non-modular implants seems to increase during revision. Ultimately, it cannot be proven whether this is actually applicable, since the absolute number of implanted prosthesis systems is not known. Various implant-, patient-, and surgeon-related factors may lead to these reported femoral stem fractures. However, this systematic review suggests that this is, in general, a rare complication.

Catastrophic failure of femoral stem modular junction when combined with metal-on-metal bearing in comparison to ceramic-on-ceramic: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Metal ion release from total hip arthroplasty's (THA) metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surfaces or head-neck modular junction (trunnionosis) has been identified as a major cause of adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD). No study has compared the effects of these bearing couples when combined with modular neck femoral stems (MNFS) (i.e. did a modular CoCr have a higher effect than large MoM bearings on whole blood ion concentrations and ARMD). Therefore we did a retrospective comparative analysis of prospectively collected data aiming to: (1) assess the difference in metal ion release between a group of MoM and CoC bearings implanted with a non-cemented MNFS; (2) compare the ARMD and the related revision rates between the two bearing types; (3) compare the patients' HOOS and Harris Hip scores.

HYPOTHESIS

Metal ion levels and complications rate will be higher in MoM group.

METHODS

Thirty hips received the same short MNFS with modular CoCr. Seventeen had CoC bearing (16=36mm) and 13 large diameter head (LDH) MoM bearing (mean=50mm, 44-54mm) Both groups had whole blood Cobalt (Co) and Chromium (Cr) concentrations measurements at last follow up or before revision surgery (if any) and were compared to 41 control individuals without implants. ARMD, revision rates and other complications were censed. Functional outcome differences between operative groups were assessed with HOOS and Harris Hip scores.

RESULTS

Mean whole blood Co and Cr were 1.9μg/L (0.1-10.6 min-max) and 1.2μg/L (0.2-4.6 min-max) in the CoC group and 12.7μg/L (2.5-40.7 min-max) and 8.2μg/L (2.8-40.6 min-max) for MoM group. Controls presented whole blood Co and Cr levels of 0.2μg/L (0.04-0.2 min-max) and 0.6μg/L (0.1-0.7 min-max) respectively. CoC had significantly higher whole blood metal ion concentrations than controls, while MoM had significantly higher concentrations than both (p<0.001). MoM had a 9/13 (69%) revision rate due to ARMD (with stem-neck junction corrosion and wear were present in all cases) while the CoC had none. Functional scores at last follow up did not statistically differ between groups (Harris: CoC=94.1±8.4 vs MoM 91.8±14.8 (p=0.22) and CoC HOOS 90.2±10.7 vs 75.6±21.7 (p=0.08)).

CONCLUSION

In our study, MNFS with CoCr modular neck released metal ion systemically, as shown in CoC THAs, but when combined with MoM LDH bearings, that elevation was significantly higher. In MNFS MoM, these high metal ion levels translated into a dramatic ARMD related revision rate where stem-neck junction corrosion and wear were present in all cases. More research is required to understand the effects of MoM bearing on neck-stem junctions, and its mechanisms of corrosion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective comparative study.