Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for Ebola patients: ethical considerations

Simulation as Proof of Concept to Assess the Feasibility and Address Uncertainties Regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in an Adolescent Patient With Viral Hemorrhagic Fever

INTRODUCTION

While general management guidelines exist for patients with viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHF), uncertainty surrounds the extent to which critical care interventions should be provided. There has been significant concern in providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to a patient with VHF due to concerns regarding CPR efficiency and the safety of the healthcare team. However, data on CPR feasibility, efficiency, and latent safety threats (LSTs) to the healthcare team in patients with VHF needing CPR are lacking. Our team proactively studied this in the simulation environment as the first step to guiding evidence-based and ethically informed decisions about CPR for these patients.

METHODS

We studied CPR metrics, times to critical interventions, and LSTs using systems-focused debriefing in an adolescent patient with VHF who had pulseless electrical activity. This exercise included 3 members inside the patient room in full PPE and special pathogens team members in modified PPE outside the room.

RESULTS

We found that CPR is feasible in full PPE. The chest compression fraction was 72%, with an average manual rate of 129 compressions per minute and an average manual depth of 2.1 inches. We identified multiple LSTs in the debriefing and video analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This simulation study showed that CPR in a patient with VHF is possible in full PPE with a minimum of 3 team members. However, we identified physical and psychological LSTs with the systems-focused debriefing. Therefore, refining roles and responsibilities would be necessary to improve the safety of the healthcare team and improve the quality of CPR.

In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

This article reviews the epidemiology and management of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Transmission of Infections during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency lifesaving endeavor, performed in either the hospital or outpatient settings, that significantly improves outcomes and survival rates when performed in a timely fashion. As with any other medical procedure, CPR can bear potential risks not only for the patient but also for the rescuer. Among those risks, transmission of an infectious agent has been one of the most compelling triggers of reluctance to perform CPR among providers. The concern for transmission of an infection from the resuscitated subject may impede prompt initiation and implementation of CPR, compromising survival rates and neurological outcomes of the patients. Infections during CPR can be potentially acquired through airborne, droplet, contact, or hematogenous transmission. However, only a few cases of infection transmission have been actually reported globally. In this review, we present the available epidemiological findings on transmission of different pathogens during CPR and data on reluctance of health care workers to perform CPR. We also outline the levels of personal protective equipment and other protective measures according to potential infectious hazards that providers are potentially exposed to during CPR and summarize current guidelines on protection of CPR providers from international societies and stakeholders.

Hospital resuscitation teams: a review of the risks to the healthcare worker

Background

“Code blue” events and related resuscitation efforts involve multidisciplinary bedside teams that implement specialized interventions aimed at patient revival. Activities include performing effective chest compressions, assessing and restoring a perfusing cardiac rhythm, stabilizing the airway, and treating the underlying cause of the arrest. While the existing critical care literature has appropriately focused on the patient, there has been a dearth of information discussing the various stresses to the healthcare team. This review summarizes the available literature regarding occupational risks to medical emergency teams, characterizes these risks, offers preventive strategies to healthcare workers, and highlights further research needs.

Methods

We performed a literature search of PubMed for English articles of all types (randomized controlled trials, case-control and cohort studies, case reports and series, editorials and commentaries) through September 22, 2016, discussing potential occupational hazards during resuscitation scenarios. Of the 6266 articles reviewed, 73 relevant articles were included.

Results

The literature search identified six potential occupational risk categories to members of the resuscitation team—infectious, electrical, musculoskeletal, chemical, irradiative, and psychological. Retrieved articles were reviewed in detail by the authors.

Conclusion

Overall, we found there is limited evidence detailing the risks to healthcare workers performing resuscitation. We identify these risks and offer potential solutions. There are clearly numerous opportunities for further study in this field.