Seeking progress in disease modification in Parkinson disease

Rate of motor progression in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The search for neuroprotective treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD) still relies largely on motor disability scales. A limitation of these tools is the strong influence of symptomatic dopaminergic treatment effects. Drawing on a wealth of published information, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of motor progression in PD and its relationships with dopaminergic therapy.

Methods

We searched Medline, Embase, and Central to identify 84 publications with adequate serial motor scores to calculate progression, expressed as an increase in the percentage of maximum disability.

Results

A random-effects model showed motor progression at 2.0% p.a. (95% CI 1.7-2.4%). There were no significant differences by baseline age, sample size, or observation period. However, untreated patients, in 8 publications, progressed at 4.5% p.a. compared to 1.6% p.a. in 76 studies containing individuals on dopaminergic drugs (p = 0.0004, q = 0.003). This was supported by research on phenoconversion in prodromal PD, where motor progression exceeded 5% p.a. in the 2 years before diagnosis. Starting levodopa improved pre-treatment disability by 40.3 ± 15.2%. Practically defined off state measurements increase faster than on scores by a modest degree (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

This survey suggests that accurate long-term measurements of motor progression to assess disease-modifying therapies can be conducted despite the sequential commencement of dopaminergic drugs and sample attrition over time. While study designs involving prodromal or untreated PD avoid confounding effects of symptomatic treatment, different assumptions about motor progression may be needed. A defined off state with the levodopa test dose method maximizes information about the medication cycle once dopaminergic therapy has begun.

Developing disease-modifying interventions in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder and early synucleinopathy

Alpha-synucleinopathies are prevalent neurological disorders that cause significant disability, leading to progressive clinical deterioration that is currently managed solely through symptomatic treatment. Efforts to evaluate disease-modifying therapies during the established stage of the disease have not yielded positive outcomes in terms of clinical or imaging efficacy endpoints. However, alpha-synucleinopathies have a long prodromal phase that presents a promising opportunity for intervention with disease-modifying therapies. The presence of polysomnography-confirmed REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is the most reliable risk factor for identifying individuals in the prodromal stage of alpha-synucleinopathy. This paper discusses the rationale behind targeting idiopathic/isolated RBD in disease-modifying trials and outlines possible study designs, including strategies for patient stratification, selection of biomarkers to assess disease progression and patient eligibility, as well as the identification of suitable endpoints. Additionally, the potential targets for disease-modifying treatment in alpha-synucleinopathies are summarized.

Opportunities and Pitfalls of REM Sleep Behavior Disorder and Olfactory Dysfunction as Early Markers in Parkinson's Disease

During its pre-motor stage, Parkinson's disease (PD) presents itself with a multitude of non-motor symptoms with different degrees of specificity and sensitivity. The most important among them are REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) and olfactory dysfunction. RBD is a parasomnia characterized by the loss of REM sleep muscle atonia and dream-enacting behaviors. Olfactory dysfunction in individuals with prodromal PD is usually described as hyposmia (reduced sense of smell) or anosmia (complete loss of olfactory function). These symptoms can precede the full expression of motor symptoms by decades. A close comprehension of these symptoms and the underlying mechanisms may enable early screening as well as interventions to improve patients' quality of life. Therefore, these symptoms have unmatched potential for identifying PD patients in prodromal stages, not only allowing early diagnosis but potentially opening a window for early, possibly disease-modifying intervention. However, they come with certain challenges. This review addresses some of the key opportunities and pitfalls of both RBD and olfactory dysfunction as early markers of PD.

GM1 Ganglioside as a Disease-Modifying Therapeutic for Parkinson's Disease: A Multi-Functional Glycosphingolipid That Targets Multiple Parkinson's Disease-Relevant Pathogenic Mechanisms

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting millions of patients worldwide. Many therapeutics are available for treating PD symptoms but there is no disease-modifying therapeutic that has been unequivocally shown to slow or stop the progression of the disease. There are several factors contributing to the failure of many putative disease-modifying agents in clinical trials and these include the choice of patients and clinical trial designs for disease modification trials. Perhaps more important, however, is the choice of therapeutic, which for the most part, has not taken into account the multiple and complex pathogenic mechanisms and processes involved in PD. This paper discusses some of the factors contributing to the lack of success in PD disease-modification trials, which have mostly investigated therapeutics with a singular mechanism of action directed at one of the many PD pathogenic processes, and suggests that an alternative strategy for success may be to employ multi-functional therapeutics that target multiple PD-relevant pathogenic mechanisms. Evidence is presented that the multi-functional glycosphingolipid GM1 ganglioside may be just such a therapeutic.

Models of precision medicine for neurodegeneration

The clinicopathologic model that defines neurodegenerative disorders has remained unchanged for over a century. According to it, clinical manifestations are defined and explained by a given pathology, that is, by the burden and distribution of selected proteins aggregated into insoluble amyloids. There are two logical consequences from this model: (1) a measurement of the disease-defining pathology represents a biomarker of that disease in everyone affected, and (2) the targeted elimination of that pathology should end that disease. But success in disease modification guided by this model has remained elusive. New technologies to probe living biology have been used to validate rather than question the clinicopathologic model, despite three important observations: (1) a disease-defining pathology in isolation (without other pathologies) is an exceptional autopsy finding; (2) many genetic and molecular pathways converge on the same pathology; (3) the presence of pathology without neurological disease is more common than expected by chance. We here discuss the rationale for abandoning the clinicopathologic model, review the competing biological model of neurodegeneration, and propose developmental pathways for biomarker development and disease-modifying efforts. Further, in justifying future disease-modifying trials testing putative neuroprotective molecules, a key inclusion criterion must be the deployment of a bioassay of the mechanism corrected by the therapy of interest. No improvements in trial design or execution can overcome the fundamental deficit created by testing experimental therapies in clinically defined recipients unselected for their biologically suitability. Biological subtyping is the key developmental milestone needed to launch precision medicine for patients living with neurodegenerative disorders.

How should future clinical trials be designed in the search for disease-modifying therapies for Parkinson's disease?

INTRODUCTION

Although there has been substantial progress in research and innovations in symptomatic treatments, similar success has not been achieved in disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for Parkinson's disease (PD). Considering the enormous motor, psychosocial and financial burden associated with PD, safe and effective DMT is of paramount importance.

AREAS COVERED

One of the reasons for the lack of progress in DMT for PD is poor or inappropriate design of clinical trials. In the first part of the article, the authors focus on the plausible reasons why the previous trials have failed and in the latter part, they provide their perspectives on future DMT trials.

EXPERT OPINION

There are several potential reasons why previous trials have failed, including broad clinical and etiopathogenic heterogeneity of PD, poor definition and documentation of target engagement, lack of appropriate biomarkers and outcome measures, and short duration of follow-up. To address these deficiencies, future trials may consider- (i) a more customized approach to select the most suitable participants and therapeutic approaches, (ii) explore combination therapies that would target multiple pathogenetic mechanisms, and (iii) moving beyond targeting only motor symptoms to also assessing non-motor features of PD in well-designed longitudinal studies.

What to Test in Parkinson Disease Prevention Trials? Repurposed, Low-Risk, and Gene-Targeted Drugs

Despite the sound epidemiologic and basic science rationales underpinning numerous "disease modification" trials in manifest Parkinson disease (PD), none has convincingly demonstrated that a treatment slows progression. Rapidly expanding knowledge of the genetic determinants and prodromal features of PD now allows realistic planning of prevention trials with initiation of putatively neuroprotective therapies earlier in the disease. In this article, we outline the principles of drug selection for PD prevention trials, focused on proof-of-concept opportunities that will help establish a methodological foundation for this fledgling field. We describe prototypical, relatively low-risk drug candidates for such trials (e.g., albuterol, ambroxol, caffeine, ibuprofen), tailored to specific at-risk populations ranging from pathogenic LRRK2 or GBA gene variant carriers to those defined by prodromal PD and α-synucleinopathy. Finally, we review gene-targeted approaches currently in development targeting clinically manifest PD for their potential in future prevention trials.

The Disease Modification Conundrum in Parkinson’s Disease: Failures and Hopes

In the last half-century, Parkinson’s disease (PD) has played a historical role in demonstrating our ability to translate preclinical scientific advances in pathology and pharmacology into highly effective clinical therapies. Yet, as highly efficacious symptomatic treatments were successfully developed and adopted in clinical practice, PD remained a progressive disease without a cure. In contrast with the success story of symptomatic therapies, the lack of translation of disease-modifying interventions effective in preclinical models into clinical success has continued to accumulate failures in the past two decades. The ability to stop, prevent or mitigate progression in PD remains the “holy grail” in PD science at the present time. The large number of high-quality disease modification clinical trials in the past two decades with its lessons learned, as well as the growing knowledge of PD molecular pathology should enable us to have a deeper understanding of the reasons for past failures and what we need to do to reach better outcomes. Periodic reviews and mini-reviews of the unsolved disease modification conundrum in PD are important, considering how this field is rapidly evolving along with our views and understanding of the possible explanations.