Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Pancreas

A rare early gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms misdignosed to early gastric cancer

Recently, mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) have attracted more attention. However, early gastric MiNEN is uncommon, and there are rare reports on the characteristics of it. As its clinical and endoscopic features are resemble to early gastric cancer (EGC), it can be easily misdiagnosed. The purpose of this article is to elaborate the endoscopic and pathological characteristics of early gastric MiNEN, which is of great significance for distinguishing it from EGC. A 67-year-old male patient underwent EGD revealing a 0-IIc+IIa lesion on the lesser curvature of the lower stomach body. The biopsy pathology indicated the lesion was an EGC. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was subsequently applied to remove the lesion. According to postoperative pathological, the lesion was diagnosed as early MiNEN (tubular adenocarcinoma 50%, neuroendocrine carcinoma 50%), pT1b (submucosa 600 μm), pUL (1), Ly (0), v (1), pHM0, pVM0. And after that, surgical resection were added. A follow-up CT scan and endoscopy performed six months later revealed no metastasis or recurrence. This case highlights that early gastric MiNEN could mimic ECG. We deemed that ME-NBI combined with pathological biopsy could contribute to the identification of early gastric MiNEN.

Practical hints for the diagnosis of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system

In this editorial, a comment on the article by Díaz-López et al published in the recent issue of the 2024 is provided. We focus on the practical implications critical for providing a correct and complete diagnosis of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) in the gastrointestinal system. The diagnosis of MiNEN begins with the recognition of neuroendocrine features in one component of a biphasic tumor. The non-neuroendocrine counterpart can be virtually represented by any neoplastic type, even though the most frequent histologies are glandular and squamous. However, qualification of the neuroendocrine component requires histological and immunohistochemical confirmation. Neuroendocrine tumors are characterized by a peculiar architectural organization and bland nuclei with granular "salt and pepper" chromatin. Although neuroendocrine carcinomas have multiple and variable presentations, they typically show a solid or organoid architecture. The histological aspect needs to be confirmed by immunohistochemistry, and a diagnosis is confirmed whenever the expression of keratin and neuroendocrine markers is observed. Once both histopathological and immunohistochemical features of neuroendocrine neoplasms are identified, it is important to consider the three major pitfalls of MiNEN diagnostics: (1) Entrapment of neuroendocrine non-neoplastic cells within the tumor mass; (2) Differential diagnosis with amphicrine neoplasms; and (3) Differential diagnosis of tumors that partially express neuroendocrine markers. According to the current guidelines for diagnosing digestive MiNEN, each component must represent at least 30% of the entire neoplastic mass. Although the high-grade histopathological subtype frequently determines disease prognosis, both components can significantly affect prognosis. Thus, if one of the components, either neuroendocrine or non-neuroendocrine, does not fulfill the volumetric criteria, the guidelines still encourage reporting it. These strict criteria are essential for correctly recognizing and characterizing digestive MiNENs. This task is essential because it has prognostic relevance and substantial potential value for guiding further studies in this field. In the future, systematic analyses should be performed to validate or reconsider the current 30% cutoff value.

CT and MR imaging features of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm of the pancreas compared with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of pancreatic mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) and compare them with those of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and neuroendocrine tumor (NET).

METHODS

Twelve patients with pancreatic MiNEN, 24 patients with PDAC, and 24 patients with NET, who underwent both contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, were included. Clinical data and the key imaging features were retrospectively evaluated by two independent readers and compared between MiNEN and PDAC or NET. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to obtain predictors for pancreatic MiNEN.

RESULTS

Patients with pancreatic MiNEN more frequently presented with large size and heterogeneous and cystic components compared with PDAC (p < 0.031) and ill-defined irregular margins, progressive enhancement, and adjacent organ involvement compared with NET (p < 0.036). However, vascular invasion was less commonly seen in MiNEN than PDAC (p = 0.010). Moderate enhancement was observed more frequently in MiNEN than in PDAC or NET (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic analyses demonstrated that moderate enhancement and ill-defined irregular margin were the most valuable features for the prediction of pancreatic MiNEN (p ≤ 0.044). The combination of the two features resulted in a specificity of 93.8%, sensitivity of 83.3%, and accuracy of 91.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

We have mainly described the radiological findings of pancreatic MiNEN with ill-defined irregular margin and moderate enhancement compared with PDAC and NET. The combination of imaging features could improve diagnostic efficiency and help in the selection of the correct treatment method.