Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gallbladder: A single institute analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are classified as neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), and mixed neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) according to World Health Organization classification. We present our experience of NENs of the gallbladder (GB) from a high-volume cancer hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study is a retrospective analysis of all patients with GB NENs who presented between January 2015 and June 2023. The patient details and treatment received with follow-up were noted. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were included in the study. The median age was 52 (27-81) years. There was a female predominance (70.7%). NEC was the most common subtype (84.4%) followed by MiNEN (12.9%) and NET (2.7%). The most common stage at presentation was metastatic (70.7%) followed by locally advanced (21.8%), and early disease (7.5%). The median follow-up was 9.92 (1.77-76.06) months. Median OS was 6.14 (3.93-8.35) months. Median OS in patients who received multimodality treatment was 20.20 (17.99-22.41) months versus 4.00 (2.91-5.10) months in those who did not receive it.

CONCLUSION

GB NENs are rare, but aggressive tumors with NEC being the most common type. Multimodality treatment yields favorable outcomes. However, the development of better systemic therapy is needed to help improve survival further.

Response to capmatinib in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder origin harboring MET amplification

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the gallbladder origin is particularly rare, accounting for only 0.38% of primary malignancies of the gallbladder, and standard therapies are limited. The MET gene encodes the tyrosine kinase receptor, c-Met. Pathogenic variants of MET, such as MET exon 14 skipping and MET amplification, result in excessive downstream signaling that promotes tumor progression. A MET inhibitor, capmatinib, blocks signaling of c-Met and has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for non-small cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 skipping. The effectiveness of capmatinib has been reported in other cancers with MET amplification, but NEC with MET variants has not been reported. Here, we present a case of a 72-year-old woman with NEC of the gallbladder with multiple liver and lymph node metastases, who was resistant to conventional chemotherapy including carboplatin plus etoposide as first-line treatment and irinotecan as second-line treatment, but she responded to capmatinib. After 6 weeks of treatment, CT scan showed a partial response (80% reduction in size), but after 13 weeks, regrowth of liver metastasis was observed. Herein, we report a meaningful efficacy of capmatinib to the patient of NEC of the gallbladder origin with MET amplification.

An Italian real-world multicenter study of patients with advanced mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system treated with chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to describe the clinical management of an Italian series of patients with advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) MiNENs treated in clinical practice.

METHODS

Clinical records of patients from four Italian referral Centers were retrospectively analyzed to correlate clinical/biological data with clinical outcomes. All the surgical specimens were centrally reviewed.

RESULTS

Clinical data and surgical samples of 51 patients during 1995-2015 were analyzed. Sites of origin were: 32 colorectal, 14 gastro-esophageal, and 5 pancreatobiliary. Twenty-one out of fifty-one (42.2%) developed metachronous distant metastases. Only 5/51 (9.8%) patients received peri-operative therapy, and 23/51 (45.1%) first-line chemotherapy, mostly fluoropyrimidines/oxaliplatin. The NEN component was poorly differentiated in the whole population. Patients with Ki67 index < 55% in the NEC component had a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) (35.3 months; 95% CI 27.1-41.0) than those with Ki67 ≥ 55% (11.9 months; 95% CI 9.1-14.0) P = 0.0005. The median OS was 14 months (95% CI 10.1-19.1) in the whole cohort, with 11.4 months (95% CI 6.2-20.2) in patients who received a first-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that GEP-MiNENs represent a complex disease and that over the past years the clinical management has been predominantly guided by the subjective judgment of the clinicians. Although, in this series, the NEC component appeared mostly responsible for the systemic spread and prognosis on the whole neoplasm, the lack of strong prognostic and predictive factors universally recognized seems to condition their management so far. Future prospective clinical and biomolecular studies could help clinicians to improve clinical management of GEP-MiNENs.

Primary Oral Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN): A Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare tumors recently characterized by the presence of both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components within the same tumor tissue. Although MiNEN found their place in the WHO classification for various organs, this composite tumor in the head and neck region remains exceptionally rare. We present a case of primary oral MiNEN in a 64-year-old male located on the left side of lower gingiva. Biopsy raised suspicion of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and the patient underwent partial mandibulectomy. The resected specimen showed two distinct components of NEC and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with the confirmation of immunohistochemical markers. There has been no sign of recurrence nor metastasis 6 years after the surgery. In addition, we have conducted a review of published cases with potential relevance to this entity, resulting in five cases. The diverse terminology reinforces the need for a standardized classification system of oral/head and neck MiNENs.

Clinical impact of mixed pulmonary carcinoma and carcinoid: the driver from their mono-clonal origin

The combination of neuroendocrine/non neuroendocrine lung tumors (CNNELT) mentioned in the last edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) of Thoracic Tumors refers to small cell carcinoma (SCLC) or large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) mixed with any other non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Typical Carcinoid (TC)/Atypical Carcinoid (AC) combined with NSCLC is not included among this category. However, case reports of TC/AC combined with NSCLC have been described. We previously reported 2 cases of lung adenocarcinoma (LUA) mixed with carcinoid sharing mutations in both components supporting the hypothesis of a clonal origin. We extended our analysis to other four cases of mixed NSCLC-carcinoid by performing targeted-DNA and RNA-based NGS analysis in both primary and their paired lymph nodes metastasis. In all cases, LUA and AC components shared at least 1 common mutation (KRAS driver mutation p.Gly12Val in cases 1 and 3, AKAP13-RET fusion in case 2, and missense KRAS driver mutation p.Gly12Ala in case 4, reinforcing the hypothesis of a clonal origin. Moreover, the same mutation was detected in the metastasis constituted only by AC (cases 2 and 4). Although it is a rare malignancy in the lung, mixed LUA and TC/AC could be included among the histotypes for which a deep molecular characterization of both components is needed to identify the presence of potential druggable genetic alterations.

Mixed mucinous adenocarcinoma/large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: case report and molecular characterization of a rare entity

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix are rare and generally aggressive diseases. They often present at an advanced stage with hematogenous or lymphatic metastases. The prognosis is poor, mostly influenced by the neuroendocrine component. Unfortunately, the rarity of the disease caused a lack of information about its pathogenesis and molecular landscape. The latest guidelines recommend a multimodal approach that usually includes radical surgery, platinum/etoposide-based chemotherapy, or chemoradiation. Here, we are presenting a case of metastatic mixed adenocarcinoma-large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix in a 49-year-old female patient. The molecular characterization of the lesion highlighted the ubiquitous presence of human papillomavirus-18 DNA both in the adenocarcinomatous and the neuroendocrine components, suggesting a role for the virus in the pathogenesis. Moreover, a different set of mutations was detected in the two parts, thus ruling out a possible clonal evolution of the neuroendocrine component from the adenocarcinoma one. More studies are needed to clarify the molecular landscape of these rare lesions and identify putative targets for therapy.

Gastric Amphicrine Carcinoma Showing Neuroendocrine and Pancreatic Acinar Cell Differentiation. Lesson from a Challenging Case Opening New Perspectives in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Amphicrine carcinomas are epithelial neoplasms composed of cells with co-existing exocrine-neuroendocrine phenotype and are challenging lesions from both diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives.Here, we report the case of a 63-year-old male patient with a gastric nodule that was endoscopically biopsied, revealing histological features of a type 3 well-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumor (NET). At imaging, the lesion was single and limited to the stomach, but did not present In-111Octreotide uptake, despite SSTR2A immunohistochemical expression. The patient underwent a wedge resection of the gastric wall, with a final pathological diagnosis of amphicrine carcinoma with pancreatic acinar cell and neuroendocrine features (pT1b). Predictive immunohistochemistry showed microsatellite stability and negative HER2 status. Hotspot targeted deep sequencing of 57 genes showed no somatic mutation, in agreement with the low mutational burden reported for gastric amphicrine carcinomas. Due to a low stage of the tumor and the poor performance status of the patient, no additional oncological treatment was administered. The patient was disease-free after 18 months.This unusual case highlights the importance of considering amphicrine carcinoma in the diagnostic work-up of gastric type 3 NET. This can be done by including in the immunohistochemical panel non-neuroendocrine markers, such as the pancreatic acinar cell and glandular ones. Correct pathological diagnosis is pivotal to determine the appropriate staging (NET vs exocrine one) for surgical and oncological management.

Recurrent gastric amphicrine tumor with neuroendocrine and pancreatic acinar cell differentiation and somatic MEN1 inactivation arisen during immunotherapy

Amphicrine neoplasms (ANs) are poorly understood epithelial malignancies composed of cells with co-existing exocrine-neuroendocrine features. Here, we report a recurrent mucin-producing gastric amphicrine tumor co-expressing neuroendocrine (chromogranin-A, synaptophysin, and CD56) and pancreatic acinar cell (BCL10 and trypsin) markers, arisen in a 64-year-old woman during adjuvant immunotherapy for melanoma. Ki-67 was < 2%. The gastric background context was atrophic gastritis. Next-generation sequencing showed MEN1 mutation (p.P71fs*42) coupled with loss of heterozygosity. The key lessons were as follows: (1) gastric ANs can show the co-existence of exocrine mucin-producing elements with neuroendocrine and pancreatic acinar differentiation; (2) they may represent a new entity arising in the context of atrophic gastritis and during immunotherapy; (3) they should be considered in the diagnostic workup of gastric neuroendocrine tumors; and (4) their molecular profile can show striking similarities with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. These findings may be of help to improve the knowledge and the biological taxonomy of ANs.

CT and MR imaging features of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm of the pancreas compared with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of pancreatic mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) and compare them with those of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and neuroendocrine tumor (NET).

METHODS

Twelve patients with pancreatic MiNEN, 24 patients with PDAC, and 24 patients with NET, who underwent both contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, were included. Clinical data and the key imaging features were retrospectively evaluated by two independent readers and compared between MiNEN and PDAC or NET. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to obtain predictors for pancreatic MiNEN.

RESULTS

Patients with pancreatic MiNEN more frequently presented with large size and heterogeneous and cystic components compared with PDAC (p < 0.031) and ill-defined irregular margins, progressive enhancement, and adjacent organ involvement compared with NET (p < 0.036). However, vascular invasion was less commonly seen in MiNEN than PDAC (p = 0.010). Moderate enhancement was observed more frequently in MiNEN than in PDAC or NET (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic analyses demonstrated that moderate enhancement and ill-defined irregular margin were the most valuable features for the prediction of pancreatic MiNEN (p ≤ 0.044). The combination of the two features resulted in a specificity of 93.8%, sensitivity of 83.3%, and accuracy of 91.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

We have mainly described the radiological findings of pancreatic MiNEN with ill-defined irregular margin and moderate enhancement compared with PDAC and NET. The combination of imaging features could improve diagnostic efficiency and help in the selection of the correct treatment method.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm with mucinous adenocarcinoma and amphicrine carcinoma components in the bile duct: an autopsy case

We report the first case of bile duct mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) that had a mucinous carcinoma component. An 88-year-old man with biliary obstruction was diagnosed as having distal bile duct cancer using imaging examinations and endoscopic biopsy. The patient received the best supportive care without surgical resection for 13 months until death. An autopsy revealed a bulky mass involving the distal bile duct and multiple metastases in intra-abdominal lymph nodes, the liver, and the lungs. The primary cancer was microscopically diagnosed as a MiNEN, which consisted of mucinous adenocarcinoma and large cell-type neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) components. Metastatic lesions in the liver and lungs were composed of only NEC with rich extracellular mucin without adenocarcinoma cells. Using electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry, it was proved that all NEC cells in both primary and metastatic lesions had amphicrine features. On the basis of pathological findings, we thought that the MiNEN was initially derived from a mucinous adenocarcinoma that dedifferentiated to amphicrine NEC cells with mucin production.

Comprehensive analysis of mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs): A SEER database analysis of 767 cases

Background

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is an extremely rare entity, consisting of neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components. It can occur in various organs throughout the body, with a rising incidence. Its clinical management is a rapidly growing field of interest; however, large-scale patient cohorts are still missing to guide clinical practice.

Patients and methods

The demographic, clinicopathological, and survival information of all patients diagnosed with MiNEN in the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database (2000-2017) were extracted and further analyzed. The information of the patients before and after 2010 was compared to understand the epidemiological changes of MiNEN. The characteristics of MiNEN originating in different organs were compared. The clinical significance of surgical resection for metastatic MiNENs was also analyzed.

Results

A total of 1081 patients were screened, and after applying the exclusion criteria, 767 patients were finally analyzed. There was no obvious sex preference (49.2% vs 50.8%, p>0.05) and the majority of the patients were Caucasians (n=627, 81.7%). A total of 88.3% of the patients were older than 50 years old, and the median age was 60 years. 79.3% of the tumors are located in the distal digestive tract, and 67.7% were grade 3/4. Distant metastasis was presented in 33.9% of the patients at diagnosis. A total of 88% of the patients underwent surgical treatments. The number of patients increased 10-fold between 2000 and 2017. There was no significant difference in sex, race, stage, or surgical treatments among the patients diagnosed before and after 2010. More patients older than 60 years were diagnosed after 2010 (p=0.009). The median survival was 61.0 ± 9.8 months for the whole cohort. After multivariate analysis, older age (>60 years, p<0.01), more advanced stage (p<0.01), grade 3/4 (p<0.01), and non-surgical treatment (p<0.01) were independent risk factors for poorer survival. The appendiceal MiNENs showed the best prognosis. A total of 260 metastatic MiNENs were further analyzed. Only patients with metastatic MiNENs originating from the appendix had a potential benefit from surgical resection, compared to other sites (p=0.05).

Conclusion

This study provides the epidemiological, clinicopathological, and survival information of the largest number of MiNEN patients. Although MiNEN is an extremely rare malignant neoplasm, its incidence increases rapidly. The majority of the patients suffered from advanced-stage disease, which highlights the need for improvement of early detection in the future. The appendix is the most common primary site of MiNEN, and surgical resection for selected metastatic MiNEN originating in the appendix has favorable survival outcomes.

Pancreatic mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma in a patient with a germline BRCA2 mutation: a case report

Loss of function in the BRCA2 gene exacerbates ovarian, breast, and pancreatic ductal cancer risk. Despite being implicated in the pancreatic ductal epithelium carcinogenesis, the involvement of a germline BRCA2 mutation in acinar and endocrine cells is less reported. A 45-year-old woman with a history of breast cancer was referred to our hospital for a detailed examination of epigastric pain. Her father had pancreatic cancer, and her paternal aunt had a history of breast cancer. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a round tumor with a contrast effect in the pancreatic head. The patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, and postoperative pathology and genetic testing revealed amphicrine-type mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma with a germline BRCA2 mutation. Recent studies have reported the BRCA2 mutation in genome sequencing of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor; perhaps, genetic testing for the BRCA2 mutation is feasible for patients with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm.

Amphicrine Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma - a Case-Based Review Expanding on Its MUC Expression Profile

Amphicrine phenotype in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare phenomenon characterized by tumor cells that show both endocrine differentiation (calcitonin secretion) and exocrine differentiation (mucin production and secretion). Not much is known about the pathobiology of amphicrine MTCs. This report undertook a case-based review approach by discussing the cytological, histopathological, and ultrastructural features of this rare enigmatic entity, expanding on the radiological and novel MUC immunohistochemistry findings from a 28-year-old MEN2B syndrome patient with C cell hyperplasia and multifocal MTC with amphicrine features. The patient had widespread hematogenous metastases at presentation. MUC immunoexpression analysis revealed evidence of micro-lumina formation, and unique to-date unreported expression patterns of MUC1, MUC5AC, and MUC6 in an amphicrine subtype of MTC. Review of the literature identified five other MTC cases with well-documented amphicrine features. Of these six cases, two were associated with MEN2B syndrome, and four had metastatic disease. Follow-up was available in three patients, and two died of disease. Recognition of this rare subtype of MTC may be of clinical interest given their frequent link to MEN2B syndrome and biological aggressiveness.

Mixed Neuroendocrine/Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) of the Ovary Arising from Endometriosis: Molecular Pathology Analysis in Support of a Pathogenetic Paradigm

Primary ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms (Ov-NENs) are infrequent and mainly represented by well-differentiated forms (neuroendocrine tumors - NETs - or carcinoids). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (Ov-NECs) are exceedingly rare and only few cases have been reported in the literature. A subset of Ov-NECs are admixed with non-neuroendocrine carcinomas, as it occurs in other female genital organs, as well (mostly endometrium and uterine cervix), and may be assimilated to mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) described in digestive and extra-digestive sites. Here, we present a case of large cell Ov-NEC admixed with an endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary, arising in the context of ovarian endometriosis, associated with a uterine endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH). We performed targeted next-generation sequencing analysis, along with a comprehensive immunohistochemical study and FISH analysis for TP53 locus, separately on the four morphologically distinct lesions (Ov-NEC, endometrioid carcinoma, endometriosis, and EAH). The results of our study identified molecular alterations of cancer-related genes (PIK3CA, CTNNB1, TP53, RB1, ARID1A, and p16), which were present with an increasing gradient from preneoplastic lesions to malignant proliferations, both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components. In conclusion, our findings underscored that the two neoplastic components of this Ov-MiNEN share a substantially identical molecular profile and they progress from a preexisting ovarian endometriotic lesion, in a patient with a coexisting preneoplastic proliferation of the endometrium, genotypically and phenotypically related to the ovarian neoplasm. Moreover, this study supports the inclusion of MiNEN in the spectrum ovarian and, possibly, of all gynecological NENs, among which they are currently not classified.

Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Pancreas

Pancreatic mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare neoplasms, composed of at least two components. The neuroendocrine part is always present. Histology is the most important tool for the diagnosis, but in the case of MiNEN, it is also important for the use of immunohistochemistry, which should include neuroendocrine but also ductal and acinar markers. Each component should be specifically described in the final pathology report, including the percentage on the entire tumor mass. The prognosis of MiNEN is very heterogeneous and depends on the different tumor components.

Prognostic Factors of Survival for High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasia of the Bladder: A SEER Database Analysis

Background: High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare and aggressive variant of bladder cancer. Considering its rarity, its therapeutic management is challenging and not standardized. Methods: We analyzed data extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to evaluate prognostic factors for high-grade NEC of the bladder. Results: We extracted data on 1134 patients: 77.6% were small cell NEC, 14.6% were NEC, 5.5% were mixed neuro-endocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasia, and 2.3% were large cell NEC. The stage at diagnosis was localized for 45% of patients, lymph nodal disease (N+M0) for 9.2% of patients, and metastatic disease for 26.1% of patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 12 months. Multivariate analysis detected that factors associated with worse OS were age being >72 years old (HR 1.94), lymph nodal involvement (HR 2.01), metastatic disease (HR 2.04), and the size of the primary tumor being >44.5 mm (HR 1.80). In the N0M0 populations, the size of the primary tumor being <44.5 mm, age being <72 years old, and major surgery were independently associated with a lower risk of death. In the N+M0 group, the size of the primary lesion was the only factor to retain an association with OS. Conclusions: Our SEER database analysis evidenced prognostic factors for high-grade NEC of the bladder that are of pivotal relevance to guide treatment and the decision-making process.

Transcription Factor Expression in Sinonasal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Olfactory Neuroblastoma (ONB): Hyams' Grades 1-3 ONBs Expand the Spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-Positive Neoplasms

Sinonasal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SN-NENs) are rare and mostly include neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), whereas neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is exceptional in this site. Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a malignant neuroectodermal neoplasm arising in the nasal cavity. Albeit crucial for correct patients' management, the distinction of high grade ONB from NEC is challenging and requires additional diagnostic markers. The transcription factor SATB2 has been recently introduced in routine diagnostics as an immunohistochemical marker of distal intestine differentiation. No specific data are available about SATB2 and GATA3 expression in SN-NENs. GATA3, SATB2, and, for comparison, CDX2 expression were investigated in a series of epithelial and non-epithelial SN-NENs. We collected 26 cases of ONB and 7 cases of epithelial SN-NENs diagnosed and treated in our Institution. ONBs were graded according to Hyams' system and epithelial NENs were reclassified into 5 NECs, 1 MiNEN, and 1 amphicrine carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed using standard automated protocols. Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs stained diffusely and intensely for SATB2, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were globally negative. The non-neuroendocrine component of MiNEN and the amphicrine carcinoma were strongly positive. GATA3 was heterogeneously and unpredictably expressed in Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were completely negative. CDX2 was negative in all cases. Our study identifies, for the first time, SATB2 and GATA3 expression as features of Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, expands the spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-positive neoplasms, and suggests that Hyams' grade 4 ONBs are not only clinically but also biologically different from low graded ONBs.

Clinicopathologic features and lymph node metastasis pattern of the cervical MiNEN

PURPOSE

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare type of cervical tumor. Its clinicopathological features, lymph node (LN) metastatic patterns and outcomes are still unclear.

METHODS

We have analyzed the clinicopathological information of 26 patients with cervical MiNEN.

RESULTS

The median age of onset for cervical MiNEN was 48 years. Macroscopically, polyps and nodules were the main types. The neuroendocrine components included small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) (14/26 cases), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) (10/26 cases), and typical carcinoid (2/26 cases). Non-neuroendocrine components included adenocarcinoma (AC) (12/26, including one case of AC in situ) and squamous cell carcinoma (SC) (10/26) and adeno-squamous cell carcinoma (ASC) (4/26). Of the 16 AC cases, 15 were human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated AC and one was HPV-independent AC. Except for the case of MiNEN with HPV-independent AC, all cases were diffusely and strongly positive for p16 protein. The lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) was seen in 17/26 cases, and the components that invade lymphatic vessels were mainly neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (15/17), followed by SC (1/17) and AC (1/17). Ten patients developed LN metastases, including six in combined SCNECs (6/14) and four in combined LCNECs (4/10); the metastatic component was pure NEC in eight cases (8/10) and SC or AC in two cases (2/10).

CONCLUSIONS

NEC component is the key factor that determines the clinical behavior and prognosis of cervical MiNEN.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

In this review, we detail the changes and the relevant features that are applied to neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in the 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. Using a question-and-answer approach, we discuss the consolidation of the nomenclature that distinguishes neuronal paragangliomas from epithelial neoplasms, which are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The criteria for these distinctions based on differentiation are outlined. NETs are generally (but not always) graded as G1, G2, and G3 based on proliferation, whereas NECs are by definition high grade; the importance of Ki67 as a tool for classification and grading is emphasized. The clinical relevance of proper classification is explained, and the importance of hormonal function is examined, including eutopic and ectopic hormone production. The tools available to pathologists for accurate classification include the conventional biomarkers of neuroendocrine lineage and differentiation, INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranins, and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), but also include transcription factors that can identify the site of origin of a metastatic lesion of unknown primary site, as well as hormones, enzymes, and keratins that play a role in functional and structural correlation. The recognition of highly proliferative, well-differentiated NETs has resulted in the need for biomarkers that can distinguish these G3 NETs from NECs, including stains to determine expression of SSTRs and those that can indicate the unique molecular pathogenetic alterations that underlie the distinction, for example, global loss of RB and aberrant p53 in pancreatic NECs compared with loss of ATRX, DAXX, and menin in pancreatic NETs. Other differential diagnoses are discussed with recommendations for biomarkers that can assist in correct classification, including the distinctions between epithelial and non-epithelial NENs that have allowed reclassification of epithelial NETs in the spine, in the duodenum, and in the middle ear; the first two may be composite tumors with neuronal and glial elements, and as this feature is integral to the duodenal lesion, it is now classified as composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET). The many other aspects of differential diagnosis are detailed with recommendations for biomarkers that can distinguish NENs from non-neuroendocrine lesions that can mimic their morphology. The concepts of mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine (MiNEN) and amphicrine tumors are clarified with information about how to approach such lesions in routine practice. Theranostic biomarkers that assist patient management are reviewed. Given the significant proportion of NENs that are associated with germline mutations that predispose to this disease, we explain the role of the pathologist in identifying precursor lesions and applying molecular immunohistochemistry to guide genetic testing.

Coexistence of superficial carcinogenesis of resident epithelium besides neuroendocrine neoplasm of the digestive tract

Background & Aims

Mixed neuroendocrine–non‐neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) comprising dual neuroendocrine and non‐neuroendocrine components. Although the coexistence pattern of neuroendocrine and non‐neuroendocrine components in definitive MiNEN is thought to overlap, there may be a coexistent pattern of both components, such as superficial carcinoma adjacent to NEN. The present study evaluated the histopathological findings of the coexistence pattern of superficial carcinomas adjacent to NENs in the esophagogastrointestinal tract.

Methods

From 2000 to 2019, 35 serial NEN resections of the esophagus (n = 9), stomach (n = 3), and large intestine (n = 23), respectively, were performed at Gunma University Hospital. Borderline areas between NEN and resident superficial epithelium were observed in the 35 serial NEN cases as well as two additional cases from affiliated hospitals.

Results

Among the 35 serial NEN samples, squamous cell carcinomatous/dysplastic components were identified 77.8% (7/9 cases) of esophageal NENs, and adenocarcinomatous areas were seen in 66.7% (2/3 cases) of gastric NENs and 26% (6/23 cases) of colorectal NENs. Thus, all superficial carcinomatous components adjacent to NENs were observed as squamous cell carcinoma/dysplasia in esophagus and adenocarcinoma in stomach and large intestine, which showed histological characteristics as the resident epithelial pattern in each organ.

Conclusions

These findings suggested a potential “paratransformation” or “bystander effect” in resident epithelium by NENs. Thus, “bystander carcinogenesis” could be a pathogenic mechanism of resident epithelium transformation adjacent to NENs in the esophagogastrointestinal tract.

Case report: composite pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and neuroendocrine tumor: a new mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm?

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) of the pancreas are extremely rare. Their pathogenesis and molecular landscape are largely unknown. Here, we report a case of mixed pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and identify its genetic alterations by next-generation sequencing (NGS).

CASE PRESENTATION

A fifty-year-old male was admitted into the hospital for evaluation of a pancreatic lesion detected during a routine examination. Abdominal ultrasound indicated a hypoechoic mass of 2.6 cm at the head of the pancreas. Malignancy was suspected and partial pancreatectomy was performed. Thorough histopathological examination revealed a mixed IPMN-NET. In some areas, the two components were relatively separated, whereas in other areas IPMN and NET grew in a composite pattern: The papillae were lined with epithelial cells of IPMN, and there were clusters of NET nests in the stroma of papillary axis. NGS revealed shared somatic mutations (KRAS, PCK1, MLL3) in both components. The patient has been uneventful 21 months after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case provides evidence of a common origin for mixed IPMN-NET with composite growth features. Our result and literature review indicate that KRAS mutation might be a driver event underlying the occurrence of MiNEN. We also recommend the inclusion of mixed non-invasive exocrine neoplasms and neuroendocrine neoplasms into MiNEN.

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm: a case report and review

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) of the pancreas is a rare entity, and obtaining a preoperative diagnosis is difficult. We present a 70-year-old man in whom the possibility of MiNEN was successfully discovered preoperatively by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Immunostaining revealed positive results for the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin. We considered the possibility for MiNEN before surgery. He underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. Immunohistochemical examination of the tumor cells showed a wide range of positivity for trypsin as well as for chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Considering that ≥ 30% tumors ware positive for both acinar and neuroendocrine markers, the patient was diagnosed with MiNEN. MiNEN is a malignant tumor that requires early detection and treatment but is a rare disease for which no method has been established. We found that EUS-FNA and immunostaining are effective diagnostic methods for MiNEN.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumour of pancreas mimicking groove pancreatitis: Case report

Introduction

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare tumour of the pancreas which can mimic groove pancreatitis.

Case report

We present a 49-year-old Indian male presented with constant, dull-aching epigastric pain for last 6 months radiating to back, not associated with jaundice, gastrointestinal bleed, fever or weight loss. He also had history of alcohol abuse for last 15 years. Physical examination was unremarkable. Laboratory investigations were within normal limits. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen was suggestive of groove pancreatitis. CA 19.9, CEA and IgG4 levels were normal. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed an oedematous mucosa with narrowing of second part of duodenum. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed bulky pancreas with ill-defined heteroechoic head with periduodenal soft tissue thickening. EUS guided fine needle aspiration revealed chronic inflammatory cells. Based on the endoscopic findings and imaging, we suspected the diagnosis to be groove pancreatitis. He underwent open Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy. Histopathological evaluation revealed well differentiated neuroendocrine tumour and immunohistochemistry revealed features which was consistent with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumour (MiNEN). Post-operative period was uneventful and he was discharged on post-op day 7. A PET-CT scan was done to look for any silent metastasis and it was negative. He recieved 4 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. He was symptom free and doing well on 12 months follow up with no evidence of recurrence in surveillance CT imaging.

Discussion

Pancreatic MiNEN is characterised by presence of two malignant tissues, adenocarcinoma and NET, with one constituent involving at least 30% of the tumour. We report the pitfalls in diagnostic work-up which can lead to misdiagnosis of this rare entity. Specially due to admixture of different kinds of tissue, radiological investigations can be misleading.

Conclusion

Our case highlights the fact that MiNEN of pancreas can mimic a benign condition like groove pancreatitis. If routine histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation is not done on the resected samples, relying on radiological and fine-needle aspiration cytology evidences, the actual diagnosis could be missed.

•

MiNEN of pancreas is a rare pathology and difficult to diagnose preoperatively.

•

MiNENs should be considered as a differential for groove pancreatitis.

•

Histopathology with immunohistochemistry should be done for all pancreatoduodenectomy specimen to diagnose such rare tumors.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumor with unique Triphasic Histological Pattern: A challenging case report

BACKGROUND

In 2017, the World Health Organization redefined two different forms of tumor components containing both neuroendocrine and non neuroendocrine as mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumor (MiNEN). It occurs in different parts of the body, including the urogenital tract,the upper respiratory tract, the digestive tract. It has a very poor prognosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61 year old man was admitted to hospital with incidental pancreatitis. CT examination showed that the injury of duodenal branch resulted in hematoma formation. Pancreatic space occupying lesions were found by surgical exploration,so he underwent radical pancreatoduodenectomy, right hemicolectomy and jejunostomy. A pathological examination revealed that the tumor was composed of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, ductal adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated sarcoma. The tumor invaded the stomach, duodenum and colon. Half a month after the operation, the patient died of leukocytic reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, MiNEN is rare with Triphasic Histological Pattern. The diagnosis and treatment of MiNEN are challenging.

Challenges in High-grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Mixed Neuroendocrine/Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The growth in knowledge of the pathogenesis, molecular background, and immunohistochemical profile of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has led not only to an increased awareness of these diseases but also to several changes of the nomenclature. In particular, the concept and terminology of high-grade (grade 3) NENs and mixed neoplasms have changed considerably over the last 20 years, creating some confusion among pathologists and clinicians. The aim of this review is to elucidate the diagnostic criteria, including the most important differential diagnoses of high-grade NENs and mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). The role of the Ki67 labelling index and morphology, used to define grade 3 NENs of the digestive system and lungs, is also discussed. The evolution of the concepts and terminology of MiNENs is revised, including the most important differential diagnoses.

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of the lower gastrointestinal tract: A systematic review with Bayesian hierarchical survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) are a subgroup of mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) described as mixed neoplasms containing dual neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components. The aim of this study was to appraise the prevalence of MANEC in the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract and provide reliable estimates of survival.

METHOD

A systematic review was undertaken in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library of Systematic Review, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, and a Bayesian hierarchical survival pooled analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 182 unique records identified, 71 studies reporting on 752 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 64.2 ± 13.6, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.25. Overall, 60.3% of MANEC were located in the appendix, 29.3% in the colon, and 10.4% in the anorectum. More than a quarter (29%) of patients had stage IV disease at diagnosis, with higher prevalence in appendiceal than colonic and anorectal primaries. More than 80% had a high-grade (G3) endocrine component. Of the 152 patients followed up for a median of 20 months (interquartile range limits, 16.5-32), median overall survival was 12.3 months (95% credible interval [95%CrI], 11.3-13.7), with a 1.12 [95%CrI, 0.67-1.83] age-adjusted hazard ratio between metastatic and non-metastatic MANEC. Stage IV disease at diagnosis was more prognostically unfavorable in cases of colonic compared to anorectal origin.

CONCLUSION

MANEC is a clinically aggressive pathological entity. The results of this study provide new insights for the understanding of tumor location within the lower GI tract and its prognosis in terms of overall survival.

Does Mixed Neuroendocrine-Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) of the Parathyroid Gland Exist? First Description of a Possible Case

We describe the histological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical features of an unusual neoplasm of the parathyroid gland showing the histologic criteria of a mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of such a tumor. A 43-year old male presented with acute and severe abdominal pain due to acute pancreatitis. On physical examination a painless lump in the right neck was detected and laboratory analyses revealed hyperparathyroidism (parathormone: 146 pmol/L, normal range 1.05-6.83) and hypercalcemia (calcium level: 3.02 mg/dL, normal range 2.25-2.5), which fell to 2.55 mg/dL after parathyroidectomy. Histologically, the tumor was a parathyroid carcinoma associated with a mucous secreting adenocarcinoma also confirmed by histochemical (Alcian blue-periodic acid Schiff) and immunohistochemical stainings. The present case expands the spectrum of MiNENs that can be found in endocrine organs.

Title: pancreatic-type mixed acinar neuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The majority of gastrointestinal tumors are adenocarcinomas. Rarely, there are other types of tumors, such as acinar cell carcinoma, and these are often called pancreatic-type acinar cell carcinomas. Among these tumors, some are differentiated into neuroendocrine components. A few of them are MiNENs.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was an 80-year-old male who was referred to our hospital for treatment of a pedunculated gastric tumor. It was 5 cm in diameter and detected in the upper gastric body with upper GI endoscopy conducted to investigate anemia. In the biopsy, although hyperplasia of gastric gland cells was noted, no tumor cells were found. Retrospectively, the diagnosis was misdiagnosed. An operation was arranged because bleeding from the tumor was suspected as a cause of anemia and because surgical resection was considered to be desirable for accurate diagnosis. Hence, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery was performed. In the pathological examination, several types of epithelial cells that proliferated in the area between the mucosa and deep inside the submucosa were observed. These consisted of acinar-glandular/trabecular patterns and solid. A diagnosis of pancreatic-type acinar cell carcinoma of the stomach with NET G2 and G3 was made based on characteristic cellular findings and the results of immunostaining tests. Each of them consisted of more than 30% of the lesion; a diagnosis of pancreatic-type mixed acinar neuroendocrine carcinoma (pancreatic-type MiNEN) of the stomach or a type of gastric MiNEN was obtained. Anemia was resolved after the operation, and the patient was discharged from the hospital without perioperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic-type ACC of the stomach that is differentiated into neuroendocrine tumors is very rare. Hence, we report this case along with a literature review.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the duodenum, ampullary region, jejunum and ileum

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the small intestine are some of the most frequently occurring along the gastrointestinal tract, even though their incidence is extremely variable according to specific sites. Jejunal-ileal neuroendocrine neoplasms account for about 27% of gastrointestinal NETs making them the second most frequent NET type. The aim of this review is to classify all tumors following the WHO 2019 classification and to describe their pathologic differences and peculiarities.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the esophagus and stomach

Esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (E-NENs) are much rarer than other gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, the majority showing aggressive behavior with early dissemination and poor prognosis. Among E-NENs, exceptionally rare well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (E-NET) and more frequent esophageal poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (E-NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) can be recognized. E-NECs usually exhibit a small cell morphology or mixed small and large cells. Esophageal MiNEN are composed of NEC component admixed with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Gastric (G) NENs encompass a wide spectrum of entities ranging from indolent G-NETs to highly aggressive G-NECs and MiNENs. Among G-NETs, ECL-cell NETs are the most common and, although composed of histamine-producing cells, are a heterogeneous group of neoplastic proliferations showing different clinical and prognostic features depending on the patient’s clinico-pathological background including the morphology of the peri-tumoral mucosa, gastrin serum levels, presence or absence of antral G-cell hyperplasia, and presence or absence of MEN1 syndrome. In general, NET associated with hypergastrinemia show a better outcome than NET not associated with hypergastrinemia. G-NECs and MiNENs are aggressive neoplasms more frequently observed in males and associated with a dismal prognosis.

A Case of Appendiceal Goblet Cell Carcinoid Tumor: Getting it right under the Microscope

Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) is a rare neoplasm of the vermiform appendix and can be mistaken as a typical neuroendocrine tumour (TNET). The natural history of this disease is more aggressive compared to TNETs and requires a more aggressive approach. We report a case of a 37-year-old male who was initially diagnosed with TNET, but subsequently revised as Tang's A GCC. He underwent appendectomy and right hemicolectomy. Aside from a persistently elevated carcinoembyrogenic antigen (CEA) result, his ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and a 68-Gallium DOTATATE PET/CT scan showed no FDG or DOTATATE avid lesions.

Mixed Intraepithelial Neoplasia-Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Gallbladder: A Hitherto Unreported Combination

Adenocarcinomas and noninvasive intraepithelial neoplasms (either polypoid or flat) are the most common gallbladder tumors; however, neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) can also occur. The majority of NENs are represented by neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), while neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are extremely rare in this location. Occasionally, NEN may present as a part of a mixed neoplasm, with a coexisting non-neuroendocrine component. The latest World Health Organization classification denotes these lesions as mixed neuroendocrine-non-NENs (MiNENs). A novel type of MiNEN, the mixed adenoma well-differentiated NET (MANET), has been increasingly recognized and reported. In such lesions, a dysplastic noninvasive neoplasm and a NET represent the exocrine and endocrine component, respectively. MANETs have mostly been identified in the colon, small intestines, and stomach. In this article, we report, we believe, the first case of mixed gallbladder neoplasm with both biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN) and NET components, which may be regarded as a variant of MANET. Given the expectably favorable prognoses of MANETs, it is imperative not to misdiagnose the infiltrative yet indolent neuroendocrine component as an invasive adenocarcinoma or a NEC.

Presentation and outcome of mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) of the pancreas and periampullary region are extremely rare and heterogeneous malignancies. Literature is sparse, clinical management is not standardized and little is known about survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify pathological and radiological features of MiNEN and assess the outcome of surgical management.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic and periampullary MiNEN between 2001 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed based on a prospective database. Histological, radiological and clinical features were assessed. Survival was analysed in a nested case-control study and matched-pair analyses with pure neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) and ductal adeno- or acinar cell carcinomas of the pancreas. A literature review with focus on survival after surgical resection was additionally performed.

RESULTS

Of 13 patients with MiNEN, 5 had acinar-MiNEN and 8 adeno-MiNEN. Two of 5 (40%) acinar-MiNEN and one adeno-MiNEN patients had liver metastases. All but one adeno-MiNEN (88%) showed preoperative radiological features of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 3 of 5 (60%) acinar-MiNEN exhibited mainly neuroendocrine features. No surgical mortality was observed. The 5-year overall survival rate in all MiNEN was 40%. Five-year survival rate was 58% in adeno-MiNEN and comparable to that of matched ductal adenocarcinomas (36%) and pNEN (48%). Five-year overall survival rate was 20% in acinar-MiNEN, compared to 39% in acinar carcinoma patients and 59% in matched pNEN patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MiNEN are rare and difficult to distinguish from pure adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine neoplasm preoperatively. Surgical resection would therefore be the treatment of choice in localized tumors.

Gastric MiNEN Arising from the Heterotopic Gastric Glands

An 80-year-old woman presented with a 30-mm protruding lesion-like submucosal tumor with a central depression located at the anterior wall of the upper gastric body. The depressed area had a well-demarcated margin, while the other area was covered by a non-neoplastic mucosa. A biopsy specimen revealed neuroendocrine carcinoma. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a heterogeneous mass with a clearly distinguished border in the submucosal layer. The mass had two distinct areas adjacent to each other. In addition, a hypoechoic zone was observed on the margin of the mass. Distal gastrectomy was performed. The final diagnosis was a mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm arising from the heterotopic gastric gland.

Comparative Outcomes in Patients With Small- and Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (NEC) and Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) of the Stomach

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), consisting of both large- and small-cell NECs, and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs), including mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), are a group of high-grade malignancies. Few studies to date have reported clinical outcomes, including prognosis, in patients with these tumors. This study therefore evaluated the clinicopathologic outcomes and prognosis in patients with NECs and MANECs.

METHODS

This study included 36 patients diagnosed with gastric NECs, including 23 with large-cell and 13 with small-cell NECs, and 85 with MiNENs, including 70 with high-grade and 15 with intermediate-grade MiNENs. Clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were assessed.

RESULTS

DFS was significantly poorer in patients with NEC than in patients with intermediate-grade MiNEN (P < .05), whereas both OS and DFS were similar in patients with NEC and high-grade MiNEN (P > .05). Patients with large-cell NEC were more likely to undergo aggressive surgery than patients with high-grade MiNEN (P < .05). Lymphovascular invasion was more frequent and DFS poorer in patients with large-cell than small-cell NECs (P < .05 each).

CONCLUSION

DFS is significantly poorer in patients with NEC than in patients with intermediate-grade MiNEN and significantly lower in patients with large-cell than small-cell NECs.

Dilemmas in Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms: First Single-Centre Report from India. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2020;51:102-108. [PMID: 30784017 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-019-00213-0]

PURPOSE

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare neoplasm comprising of exocrine and neuroendocrine elements, each representing ≥ 30% lesion. It is commonly misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma or grade-3 neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). Management is not well-defined.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively entered data at our centre from January 2011 to January 2018 revealed 16 MiNENs off 130 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). These were analysed for demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, management strategies and prognosis.

RESULTS

Four out of 16 patients, metastatic at presentation, were started on chemotherapy. Eleven of remaining 12 patients had pre-operative biopsy. Only two were diagnosed MiNEN. Four patients (33.34%) received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent curative surgery with adjuvant cisplatin+etoposide (Cis-Eto). Out of these, two patients (16.6%) developed metastasis and were shifted to capecitabine+temozolomide (Cap-Tem). Six patients (50%) with neuroendocrine-dominant MiNEN received adjuvant Cis-Eto after surgery. Two (16.6%) developed metastases for which Cap-Tem was started. One of them developed locoregional and liver metastasis. Three patients (25%) have succumbed to progressive disease, three (25%) are on treatment, and six (50%) are disease-free at 4-30 months.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative diagnosis of MiNEN is challenging, and it needs quality histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry. The 30% criteria is therapeutically insignificant, and treatment based on most aggressive component is prognostically more relevant. Neoadjuvant 5-FU-based regimens may downstage adenocarcinoma-dominant tumours. There are no guidelines on adjuvant Cis-Eto. Cap-Tem can be considered second-line chemotherapy. Poor survival is reported irrespective of site of origin and adjuvant therapy.

Looking into digestive mixed neuroendocrine - nonneuroendocrine neoplasms: subtypes, prognosis, and predictive factors

Mixed neuroendocrine - nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the digestive system represent a challenge for both pathologists and clinicians. Their nomenclature has changed several times, and their diagnostic criteria, classification and clinical behaviour have been matter of debate over the years. Although several attempts have been made to elucidate the pathogenesis and biology of MiNENs, some issues remain open. This review will provide: a historical background that helps in understanding the evolution of the concept and nomenclature of mixed neoplasms; a revision of the knowledge on this topic, including molecular aspects, to give the reader a comprehensive and practical overview on this challenging field of pathology; a focus on the diagnostic criteria and on the determination of prognostic and predictive factors; and a description of the different tumour types in the different sites of origin.

Clinical implications of mismatch repair deficiency screening in patients with mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN)

INTRODUCTION

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) are rare tumors, mainly encountered in the gastroenteropancreatic tract. Based on the limited available data, MiNEN is usually a highly aggressive neoplasm combining a high-grade neuroendocrine and a non-neuroendocrine component, associated with a poor prognostic outlook. Deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) results in microsatellite instability, which is a useful screening marker for identifying patients with Lynch syndrome and a prognostic factor for chemotherapeutic interventions. Little information on MMR status in MiNEN is available in published studies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the status and putative role of MMR on MiNEN.

METHODS

We investigated the MMR status in 44 cases and characterized their clinicopathological features and prognoses. Immunohistochemistry was performed for four mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2).

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 61 years, and 75% of the patients were male. Lymph node metastases were observed in 14 (35.9%) patients. The most common tumor localizations were gastric (28 patients, 63.6%). Lack of immunohistochemical expression of MMR proteins was shown in 38.6% of cases. The common deletion rates of one or more proteins were 29.4% (5/17) for MLH1/PMS2 and 23.5% (4/17) for MLH1. Correlation between clinicopathological parameters showed that MMR deficiency was significantly associated with early TNM stage and better prognoses in patients with MiNEN.

CONCLUSION

MiNENs showed frequent losses of MMR protein expression, which contributes to the knowledge of the pathological and clinical aspects of MiNEN tumors.

Survival Profile and Prognostic Factors for Appendiceal Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A SEER Population-Based Study

Introduction

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare form of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics and survival profile of appendiceal MiNENs, with a view of providing robust clinical features of this rare disease.

Methods

Patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2016). The prognosis of MiNEN (n = 315) was compared with other histological subtypes including neuroendocrine tumor (NETs) (n = 1734), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NECs) (n = 375), goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) (n = 968), signet ring cell carcinoma (n = 463), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) (n = 2355), and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) (n = 1187) in the appendix. Age-adjusted incidence was calculated using Joinpoint regression. The Cox proportional hazards model and the Fine–Gray competing risk model were used to perform overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) analyses, respectively.

Results

The age-adjusted incidence of MiNENs increased from 0.01/100,000 person-years in 2004 to 0.07/100,000 person-years in 2016. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates for MiNENs were 69.5, 57.4, and 43.7%, respectively, and the corresponding CSM rates were 23.1, 36.4, and 45.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the prognosis of MiNENs was worse than that of NETs, NECs, GCC, and MAC but better than that of NMAC and signet ring cell carcinoma. Tumor extension was the only independent factor influencing the prognosis of MiNENs, but tumor size, grade, and surgical approaches were not. Moreover, when compared with local excision or appendectomy, extensive surgery such as hemicolectomy or colectomy did not prolong the survival of individuals with MiNENs.

Conclusion

MiNEN is a rare but aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis differing from NENs, GCC and adenocarcinomas. To improve the prognosis of the disease, early diagnosis and comprehensive evaluation are necessary.

Gallbladder Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) Arising in Intracholecystic Papillary Neoplasm: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of a Case and Review of the Literature

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the gallbladder are generally composed of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Rare cases associated with intracholecystic papillary neoplasm (ICPN) have been reported. Although recent molecular data suggest that the different components of digestive MiNENs originate from a common precursor stem cell, this aspect has been poorly investigated in gallbladder MiNENs. We describe the clinicopathologic and molecular features of a MiNEN composed of ICPN, adenocarcinoma, and NEC. A 66-year-old woman presented with severe abdominal pain. She underwent radical cholecystectomy and an intracholecystic mass was found. Histologically, it was composed of ICPN associated with adenocarcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). The three components were positive for DNA repair proteins and p53. EMA was positive in the ICPN and adenocarcinoma components, while it was negative in the LCNEC. Heterogeneous expression of Muc5AC, cytokeratin 20, and CDX2 was only observed in the ICPN component. Cytokeratin 7 was diffusely positive in both adenocarcinoma and LCNEC components, while it was heterogeneously expressed in the ICPN. The copy number variation analysis showed overlapping results between the adenocarcinoma and LCNEC components with some minor differences with the ICPN component. The three tumor components showed the same mutation profile including TP53 mutation c.700T > C (p. Tyr234His), without mutations in other 51 genes known to be frequently altered in cancer pathogenesis and growth. This finding may support the hypothesis of a monoclonal origin of the different tumor components. We have also performed a review of the literature on gallbladder MiNENs.

Changes in histopathological classification of neuroendocrine tumors in 5th edition of WHO classification of gastrointestinal tract tumors (2019)

In a brief review is presented a summary of news in the classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system, as they were introduced in the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors published in summer 2019.

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) with pancreatic acinar differentiation: a case report

Background

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are infrequently encountered in routine practice. Some gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) have a variety of differentiation patterns; however, pancreatic acinar differentiation in gastric NECs is rare. The molecular abnormalities of NECs with pancreatic acinar differentiation are not well understood.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old male with a gastric MiNEN with pancreatic acinar differentiation without any symptoms. The tumor consisted of two components, including both glandular and solid histological features. Although the former component was a common type of adenocarcinoma, the latter showed endocrine differentiation and expressed pancreatic acinar enzymes immunohistochemically. A positive signal with the anti-BCL10 antibody, which detects one of the pancreatic acinar enzymes, was also present specifically in the latter component. We also examined TP53 genomic mutations, DNA methylation status, and allelic imbalance (AI), which is an indicator of tumor aggressiveness. Although both components of this tumor showed no genomic mutation and a low methylation epigenotype, the frequency of AI was higher in the acinar-endocrine component than in the adenocarcinomatous component. The finding of AI indicated the progression of the conventional adenocarcinoma to an acinar-endocrine component and identified the aggressive potential of the acinar-endocrine component.

Conclusions

We report a rare case of gastric MiNEN with pancreatic acinar differentiation. AI analysis revealed tumor progression and aggressiveness. In addition, the usefulness of the anti-BCL10 antibody for detecting the acinar-endocrine component was suggested.

c-MYC amplification and c-myc protein expression in pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas. New insights into the molecular signature of these rare cancers

The molecular alterations of pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs) and mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) are not completely understood, and the possible role of c-MYC amplification in tumor development, progression, and prognosis is not known. We have investigated c-MYC gene amplification in a series of 35 ACCs and 4 MANECs to evaluate its frequency and a possible prognostic role. Gene amplification was investigated using interphasic fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis simultaneously hybridizing c-MYC and the centromere of chromosome 8 probes. Protein expression was immunohistochemically investigated using a specific monoclonal anti-c-myc antibody. Twenty cases had clones with different polysomies of chromosome 8 in absence of c-MYC amplification, and 5 cases had one amplified clone and other clones with chromosome 8 polysomy, while the remaining 14 cases were diploid for chromosome 8 and lacked c-MYC amplification. All MANECs showed c-MYC amplification and/or polysomy which were observed in 54% pure ACCs. Six cases (15.3%) showed nuclear immunoreactivity for c-myc, but only 4/39 cases showed simultaneous c-MYC amplification/polysomy and nuclear protein expression. c-myc immunoreactivity as well as c-MYC amplification and/or chromosome 8 polysomy was not statistically associated with prognosis. Our study demonstrates that a subset of ACCs shows c-MYC alterations including gene amplification and chromosome 8 polysomy. Although they are not associated with a different prognostic signature, the fact that these alterations are present in all MANECs suggests a role in the acinar-neuroendocrine differentiation possibly involved in the pathogenesis of MANECs.