SARS-CoV-2 N-gene mutation leading to Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay instability

SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein Mutations Found in Switzerland Disrupt N-Gene Amplification in Commonly Used Multiplex RT-PCR Assay

At the end of 2021, we observed an increase in N-gene target failures (NGTF) with the TaqPathTM COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit from Thermo Fisher Scientific (TaqPath). We subsequently used whole-genome sequencing (Oxford Nanopore Technology) to identify potential issues with N-gene PCR efficacy. Among 168,101 positive samples with a cycle threshold (CT) value <30 from August 2021 to May 2022, 194 specimens without N-gene amplification by PCR were identified (0.12%). Most NGTF samples originated from a wave of infection attributable to the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) and its sublineages. Sequencing revealed the nucleotide substitution G28922T (A217S) in 151 samples (88.8%). The substitution G215C, a hallmark mutation for Delta lineages, was concurrently present in all of these samples. Ten samples (5.9%) carried the deletion 28,913-28,918 (del214/215), eight samples (4.7%) the deletion 28,913-28,915 (del214) and one sample (0.6%) the deletion 28,892-28,930 (del207-219). Samples showing intact N-gene amplification by PCR lacked these specific mutations, but delayed-type amplification (i.e., partial or pNGTF) was attributable to the exclusive presence of A217S. As the N gene is a common target in many RT-PCR methods for SARS-CoV-2, an in-depth analysis of single-target failures using a combination with viral whole genome sequencing may allow for the identification of diagnostic flaws and eventual new variants.

A mutation responsible for impaired detection by the Xpert SARS-CoV-2 assay independently emerged in different lineages during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 diagnosis lies on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal specimens by RT-PCR. The Xpert-Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay provides results in less than one hour from specimen reception, which makes it suitable for clinical/epidemiological circumstances that require faster responses. The analysis of a COVID-19 outbreak suspected in the neonatology ward from our institution showed that the Ct values obtained for the targeted genes in the Xpert assay were markedly different within each specimen (N Ct value > 20 cycles above the E Ct value).

RESULTS

We identified the mutation C29200T in the N gene as responsible for an impairment in the N gene amplification by performing whole genome sequencing of the specimens involved in the outbreak (Omicron variant). Subsequently, a retrospective analysis of all specimens sequenced in our institution allowed us to identify the same SNP as responsible for similar impairments in another 12 cases (42% of the total cases reported in the literature). Finally, we found that the same SNP emerged in five different lineages independently, throughout almost all the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated for the first time the impact of this SNP on the Xpert assay, when harbored by new Omicron variants. We extend our observation period throughout almost all the COVID-19 pandemic, offering the most updated observations of this phenomenon, including sequences from the seventh pandemic wave, until now absent in the reports related to this issue. Continuous monitoring of emerging SNPs that could affect the performance of the most commonly used diagnostic tests, is required to redesign the tests to restore their correct performance.

Cycle Threshold (Ct) Values of SARS-CoV-2 Detected with the GeneXpert® System and a Mutation Associated with Different Target Gene Failure

SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection tests enable rapid virus detection; however, it is challenging to identify genotypes to comprehend the local epidemiology and infection routes in real-time qRT-PCR. At the end of June 2022, our hospital experienced an in-hospital cluster of COVID-19. When examined using the GeneXpert^® System, the cycle threshold (Ct) value of the N2 region of the nucleocapsid gene of SARS-CoV-2 was approximately 10 cycles higher than that of the envelope gene. Sanger sequencing revealed a G29179T mutation in the primer and probe binding sites. A review of past test results revealed differences in Ct values in 21 of 345 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, of which 17 cases were cluster-related and 4 were not. Including these 21 cases, 36 cases in total were selected for whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The viral genomes in the cluster-related cases were identified as BA.2.10, and those in the non-cluster cases were closely related and classified as being downstream of BA.2.10 and other lineages. Although WGS can provide comprehensive information, its use is limited in various laboratory settings. A measurement platform reporting and comparing Ct values of different target genes can improve test accuracy, enhance our understanding of infection spread, and be applied to the quality control of reagents.

Impact of G29179T mutation on two commercial PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) is the gold standard for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection. However, genetic mutations in the virus can affect the result. Cycle threshold (Ct) values of N genes and their association with mutations using SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens diagnosed by the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 were examined in this study. In total, 196 nasopharyngeal swab specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection using the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2, and 34 were positive. WGS was performed for four outlier samples with increased ΔCt identified by Scatterplot analysis as well as seven control samples without increased ΔCt in the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2. The presence of the G29179T mutation was identified as a cause of increased ΔCt. PCR using the Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay did not show a similar increase in ΔCt. Previous reports focusing on N-gene mutations and their effects on SARS-CoV-2 testing including the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 were also summarized. While a single mutation that impacts one target of a multiplex NAAT is not a true detection failure, mutation compromising NAAT target region can cause confusion of the results and render the assay susceptible to diagnostic failure.

Clinical evaluation of the GeneXpert® Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV PLUS combination test

The GeneXpert^® Xpert^® Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV PLUS combination test (PLUS assay) received Health Canada approval in January 2022. The PLUS assay is similar to the SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV combination test, with modifications to improve assay robustness against circulating and emerging variants. The performance characteristics of the PLUS assay were assessed at the Lakeridge Health Oshawa Hospital Centre and the National Microbiology Laboratory of Canada. The PLUS assay was directly compared to the SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV combination test using SARS-CoV-2 culture from five variants and remnant clinical specimens collected across the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This included 50 clinical specimens negative for all pathogens, 110 clinical specimens positive for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, RSVA, and(or) RSVB and an additional 11 mixed samples to screen for target interactions. The PLUS assay showed a high % agreement with the widely used SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV combination test. Based on these findings, the PLUS assay and the Xpert SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV combination test results are largely consistent with no observed difference in sensitivity, specificity, or time to result when challenged with various SARS-CoV-2 variants. The reported cycle threshold (Ct) values provided by the new PLUS assay were also unchanged, with the exception of a possible 1-2 decrease reported in Ct for RSVA across a limited sample size.

Persistence of a Frameshifting Deletion in SARS-CoV-2 ORF7a for the Duration of a Major Outbreak

Australia experienced widespread COVID-19 outbreaks from infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant between June 2021 and February 2022. A 17-nucleotide frameshift-inducing deletion in ORF7a rapidly became represented at the consensus level (Delta-ORF7aΔ17del) in most Australian outbreak cases. Studies from early in the COVID-19 pandemic suggest that frameshift-inducing deletions in ORF7a do not persist for long in the population; therefore, Delta-ORF7aΔ17del genomes should have disappeared early in the Australian outbreak. In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of global Delta genomes to characterise the dynamics of Delta-ORF7aΔ17del over time, determined the frequency of all ORF7a deletions worldwide, and compared global trends with those of the Australian Delta outbreak. We downloaded all GISAID clade GK Delta genomes and scanned them for deletions in ORF7a. For each deletion we identified, we characterised its frequency, the number of countries it was found in, and how long it persisted. Of the 4,018,216 Delta genomes identified globally, 134,751 (~3.35%) possessed an ORF7a deletion, and ORF7aΔ17del was the most common. ORF7aΔ17del was the sole deletion in 28,014 genomes, of which 27,912 (~99.6%) originated from the Australian outbreak. During the outbreak, ~87% of genomes were Delta-ORF7aΔ17del, and genomes with this deletion were sampled until the outbreak's end. These data demonstrate that, contrary to suggestions early in the COVID-19 pandemic, genomes with frameshifting deletions in ORF7a can persist over long time periods. We suggest that the proliferation of Delta-ORF7aΔ17del genomes was likely a chance founder effect. Nonetheless, the frequency of ORF7a deletions in SARS-CoV-2 genomes worldwide suggests they might have some benefit for virus transmission.

Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests

The Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 and Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV tests were rapidly developed and widely used during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. In response to emerging genetic variability, a new SARS-CoV-2 target (RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase) has been added to both tests: Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test. A rapid evaluation of both tests was performed in South Africa, using residual respiratory specimens. Residual respiratory specimens (n = 125) were used to evaluate the Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus test and included 50 genotyped specimens. The Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test was assessed using 45 genotyped SARS-CoV-2 specimens, 10 influenza A, 10 influenza B and 20 respiratory syncytial virus specimens. Results were compared to in-country standard-of-care tests. Genotyped specimens tested the performance of the test under pressure from circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Reference material was included to assess the test limits and linearity. The Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus test performance compared to reference results across residual respiratory specimens was good (positive percentage agreement (PPA) = 95.2%, negative percentage agreement (NPA) = 95.0%) The Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test showed good performance across all residual respiratory specimens (PPA = 100%, NPA = 98.3%). All genotyped variants of concern were detected by both tests. The Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus tests can be used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2, and to diagnose and differentiate SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B and respiratory syncytial virus, respectively. The NPA was lower than the recommended 99%, but was influenced by the low number of negative specimens tested. The variants of concern assessed did not affect test performance. It is recommended that sites perform their own assessments compared to in-country standard-of-care tests.