Rewarding properties of the stereoisomers of 4-methylaminorex: Involvement of the dopamine system

DARK Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Aminorex Analogues

Aminorex (5-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-2-amine) and 4-methylaminorex (4-methyl-5-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-2-amine) are psychostimulants that have long been listed in Schedules IV and I of the UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971. However, a range of psychoactive analogues exist that are not internationally controlled and therefore often classified as new psychoactive substances (NPS). Aminorex analogues encompass failed pharmaceuticals that reemerged as drugs of abuse, and newly synthesized substances that were solely designed for recreational use by clandestine chemists. NPS, sometimes also referred to as "designer drugs" in alignment with a phenomenon arising in the early 1980s, serve as alternatives to controlled drugs. Aminorex and its derivatives interact with monoaminergic neurotransmission by interfering with the function of monoamine transporters. Hence, these compounds share pharmacological and neurochemical similarities with amphetamines and cocaine. The consumption of aminorex, 4-methylaminorex and 4,4'-dimethylaminorex (4-methyl-5-(4-methylphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-2-amine) has been associated with adverse events including death, bestowing an inglorious fame on aminorex-derived drugs. In this Review, a historical background is presented, as well as an account of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of aminorex and various analogues. Light is shed on their misuse as drug adulterants of well-established drugs on the market. This Review not only provides a detailed overview of an abused substance-class, but also emphasizes the darkest aspect of the NPS market, i.e., deleterious side effects that arise from the ingestion of certain NPS, as knowledge of the pharmacology, the potency, or the identity of the active ingredients remains obscure to NPS users.

4,4'-DMAR: chemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of a new synthetic stimulant of abuse

In recent years, the spread of new psychoactive substances has dramatically increased in term of availability of both number of compounds and chemical families. In November 2012, 4,4'-Dimethylaminorex (4,4'-DMAR), a novel synthetic stimulant, was first detected in the Netherlands. Between June 2013 and June 2014, thirty-one deaths associated with the consumption of this new drug have been registered across Europe. In this MiniReview, we have summarized the chemical, pharmacological and toxicological information about this new legal high.

Levamisole in cocaine: unexpected news from an old acquaintance

Levamisole is a pharmaceutical with anthelminthic and immunomodulatory properties that was previously used in both animals and humans to treat inflammatory conditions and cancer. Levamisole has been identified as a cocaine adulterant in the United States since 2003. By 2009, the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) estimated that 69% of the cocaine seized contained levamisole. The first case reports of complications related to levamisole in cocaine users were published in 2009. The objectives of this article are to review the literature regarding the full spectrum of possible complications related to levamisole use for medical purposes, to review the current scope of levamisole-induced complications in cocaine users and to discuss the pharmacological properties that might explain the motivation behind the large-scale adulteration of cocaine with levamisole. Literature review revealed that significant complications were quickly reported when levamisole was used in inflammatory conditions. By 1976, several cases of leukopenia and agranulocytosis were reported. Recurrence with re-exposure was well described and agranulocytosis spontaneously reversed upon discontinuation of therapy. Vasculitis secondary to levamisole treatment was first reported in 1978 and mostly manifests as leukocytoclastic vasculitis, cutaneous necrotising vasculitis and thrombotic vasculopathy without vasculitis. These findings typically, but not invariably, involve the ear lobes. Discontinuation of levamisole therapy was again a critical part of the treatment. Various neurological side effects were described with levamisole therapy, the most concerning complication being multifocal inflammatory leukoencephalopathy (MIL). Literature review identified 203 unique cases of complications in cocaine users that can be attributed to levamisole adulteration. The two principal complications reported are haematological (140 cases of neutropenia) and dermatological (84 cases). Even though these complications can occur in isolation, many cases displayed both simultaneously. No formal case of leukoencephalopathy in the setting of cocaine use has been reported so far. A striking phenomenon is the apparent high level of recurrence (27.1%) of symptoms in cocaine users after re-exposure to cocaine that is presumably adulterated. The importance of accurately identifying levamisole-induced complications is therefore critical for symptomatic patients as discontinuation of exposure is fundamental and as a correct diagnosis prevents unnecessary and potentially dangerous use of other treatment modalities like powerful immunosuppressive therapy. Literature review suggests that levamisole might have the advantages of enhancing noradrenergic neurotransmission by inhibiting reuptake, by inhibiting MAO and/or COMT, by acting on ganglionic nicotinic receptors and by being partially metabolized into an amphetamine-like compound. It could also increase endogenous opioids and increase dopamine concentration in the cerebral reward pathway. These potential effects make levamisole an interesting choice as a cocaine adulterant. It seems unlikely that levamisole use as a cocaine adulterant will soon reach an end. More information is needed about the diagnosis and treatment of levamisole-induced complications, and the efforts of the medical and public health community is needed to face this challenging problem.

Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade

Conditioned place preference (CPP) continues to be one of the most popular models to study the motivational effects of drugs and non-drug treatments in experimental animals. This is obvious from a steady year-to-year increase in the number of publications reporting the use this model. Since the compilation of the preceding review in 1998, more than 1000 new studies using place conditioning have been published, and the aim of the present review is to provide an overview of these recent publications. There are a number of trends and developments that are obvious in the literature of the last decade. First, as more and more knockout and transgenic animals become available, place conditioning is increasingly used to assess the motivational effects of drugs or non-drug rewards in genetically modified animals. Second, there is a still small but growing literature on the use of place conditioning to study the motivational aspects of pain, a field of pre-clinical research that has so far received little attention, because of the lack of appropriate animal models. Third, place conditioning continues to be widely used to study tolerance and sensitization to the rewarding effects of drugs induced by pre-treatment regimens. Fourth, extinction/reinstatement procedures in place conditioning are becoming increasingly popular. This interesting approach is thought to model certain aspects of relapse to addictive behavior and has previously almost exclusively been studied in drug self-administration paradigms. It has now also become established in the place conditioning literature and provides an additional and technically easy approach to this important phenomenon. The enormous number of studies to be covered in this review prevented in-depth discussion of many methodological, pharmacological or neurobiological aspects; to a large extent, the presentation of data had to be limited to a short and condensed summary of the most relevant findings.

Rewarding Properties of 1-Benzylpiperazine, a New Drug of Abuse, in Rats

1-Benzylpiperazine (also known as 'Legal X', 'Legal E', or 'A2') is a psychoactive compound increasingly encountered on the clandestine market. Previous experimental data suggest that the compound possesses addictive properties. In the present study, we used the conditioned place preference method in the rat to test whether 1-benzylpiperazine possesses rewarding properties. Furthermore, the mechanisms of the 1-benzylpiperazine reward were investigated using selected dopamine and serotonin receptor antagonists. 1-Benzylpiperazine (1.25, 5, and 20 mg/kg) induced dose-dependently place preference. This place preference was attenuated by the antagonists SCH23390 (0.2 mg/kg; dopamine D1-like receptors) and MDL72222 (1.0 mg/kg; serotonin3 receptors), but not by raclopride (0.8 mg/kg; dopamine D2-like receptors) or ketanserin (2 mg/kg; preferentially serotonin2 receptors). Our results show that 1-benzylpiperazine possesses rewarding properties in the rat, which suggests the compound to be susceptible to human abuse. The brain dopaminergic and serotonergic systems appear to be involved in the 1-benzylpiperazine reward.