Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor but not nicotinic acetylcholine receptor plays a role in morphine-induced behavioral sensitization in rats

Nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonism dose-dependently decreases sign- but not goal-tracking behavior in male rats

RATIONALE

Acetylcholinergic antagonists have shown some promise in reducing addiction-related behaviors in both preclinical and clinical studies. However, the psychological mechanisms by which these drugs are able to affect addictive behavior remain unclear. A particular key process for the development of addiction is the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues, which can be specifically measured in animals using a Pavlovian conditioned approach procedure. When confronted with a lever that predicts food delivery, some rats engage with the lever directly (i.e., they sign track), indicating attribution of incentive-motivational properties to the lever itself. In contrast, others treat the lever as a predictive cue and approach the location of impending food delivery (i.e., they goal track), without treating the lever itself as a reward.

OBJECTIVES

We tested whether systemic antagonism of the either nicotinic or muscarinic acetylcholine receptors would selectively affect sign- or goal-tracking behavior, indicating a selective effect on incentive salience attribution.

METHODS

A total of 98 male Sprague Dawley rats were either given the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (100, 50, or 10 µg/kg i.p.) or the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine (0.3, 1.0, or 3 mg/kg i.p.) before being trained on a Pavlovian conditioned approach procedure.

RESULTS

Scopolamine dose-dependently decreased sign tracking behavior and increased goal-tracking behavior. Mecamylamine reduced sign-tracking but did not affect goal-tracking behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Antagonism of either muscarinic or nicotinic acetylcholine receptors can reduce incentive sign-tracking behavior in male rats. This effect appears to be specifically due to a reduction in incentive salience attribution since goal-tracking either increased or was not affected by these manipulations.

A novel microRNA, novel-m009C, regulates methamphetamine rewarding effects

Methamphetamine (METH) is a widely abused psychostimulant, whose hyper-rewarding property is believed to underlie its addictive effect, but the molecular mechanism regulating this effect remains unclear. We previously reported that decreased expression of a novel microRNA (miRNA), novel-m009C, is implicated in the regulation of METH hyperlocomotion. Here, we found that novel-m009C may be homologous to hsa-miR-604. Its expression is consistently downregulated in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of mice when exposed to METH and cocaine, whereas significant alterations in novel-m009C expression were not observed in the NAc of mice subjected to other rewarding and psychiatric stimuli, such as sucrose, morphine and MK-801. We further found the substantial reduction in novel-m009C expression may be regulated by both dopamine receptor D1 (D1R) and D2 (D2R). Increasing novel-m009C levels in the NAc attenuated METH-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and hyperlocomotion, whereas inhibiting novel-m009C expression in the NAc enhanced these effects but did not change the preference of mice for a natural reward, i.e., sucrose. These effects may involve targeting of genes important for the synaptic transmission, such as Grin1 (NMDAR subunit 1). Our findings demonstrate an important role for NAc novel-m009C in regulating METH reward, reveal a novel molecular regulator of the actions of METH on brain reward circuitries and provide a new strategy for treating METH addiction based on the modulation of small non-coding RNAs.

Fas and GIT1 signalling in the prefrontal cortex mediate behavioural sensitization to methamphetamine in mice

PURPOSE

Repeated methamphetamine (METH) administration in mice readily produces behavioural sensitization, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. The present research aimed to identify new targets affecting METH-induced behavioural sensitization.

METHODS

We first established a mouse model of METH-induced behavioural sensitization. To characterize the animal model, we performed behavioural tests at different stages of behavioural sensitization and simultaneously detected changes in several neurotransmitters in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Next, we perfromed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to screen new targets, which were subsequently and verified by RT-PCR and western blot. Finally, we confirmed the roles of the new targets in METH-induced behavioural sensitization by injection of overexpressed lentiviruses and further detected related protein levels by western blot and histological changes by haematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining.

RESULTS

We successfully established a mouse model of METH-induced behavioural sensitization. The locomotor activities of the mice changed at different stages of sensitization, accompanied by changes in the levels of DA, 5-HT, GABA and glutamate. For RNA-seq analysis, we chose Fas as target, meanwhile, we chose GIT1 as target through literature. The detection of gene expression by RT-PCR indicated that METH-sensitized mice exhibited decreased levels of Fas, MEK1 and CREB and increased levels of Erk1/2 in the PFC. Western blot analysis revealed decreased Fas, GIT1, MEK1 and phosphorylated CREB levels and increased phosphorylated Erk1/2 levels in METH-sensitized mice. Injection of Fas and GIT1 injection showed that overexpression of Fas and GIT1 inhibited the induction of METH sensitization and reversed the changes in neurotransmitter levels and related protein levels, including MEK1, phosphorylated CREB and phosphorylated Erk1/2, in METH-sensitized mice. Overexpression of Fas and GIT1 also reduced histological lesions induced by METH.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicated that the development of behavioural sensitization to METH may be mediated by Fas and GIT1 through the MEK1-Erk1/2-CREB pathway.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Muscarinic receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell play different roles in context-induced or morphine-challenged expression of behavioral sensitization in rats

Both drug-related cues and drug priming are the main factors that induce relapse of drug addiction. Previous research has reported that blockade of the muscarinic receptors could significantly depress addictive behavior, suggesting that the muscarinic receptors might be involved in drug use and relapse behavior. The nucleus accumbens (NAc), especially the shell of the NAc, where the muscarinic receptors are expressed, is critical for craving and relapse. This study investigated the effects of microinfusion of the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine into the NAc shell on context- and morphine-induced expression of behavioral sensitization. Behavioral sensitization was established by exposure to 5mg/kg morphine once daily for five consecutive days. Expression of behavioral sensitization was induced by saline challenge or 5mg/kg morphine challenge. The results showed that: (a) the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine (10.8μg/rat) microinjected into the NAc shell blocked expression of conditional sensitization; (b) acetylcholinesterase inhibitor huperzine-A (0.5 and 0.1μg/rat), but not scopolamine (10.8μg/rat), microinjected into the NAc shell blocked morphine-induced expression of sensitization; and (c) pre-infusion of scopolamine (10.8μg/rat) reversed the inhibitory effect of huperzine-A (0.5μg/rat) on morphine-induced sensitization. Our findings suggest that muscarinic receptors in the NAc shell play different roles in context-induced and morphine-challenged expression of behavioral sensitization.