Structural evolution of Glycyl-tRNA synthetases alpha subunit and its implication in the initial organization of the decoding system

Symmetrical distributions of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases during the evolution of the genetic code

In this work, we formulate the following question: How the distribution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) went from an ancestral bidirectional gene (mirror symmetry) to the symmetrical distribution of aaRSs in a six-dimensional hypercube of the Standard Genetic Code (SGC)? We assume a primeval RNY code, two Extended Genetic RNA codes type 1 and 2, and the SGC. We outline the types of symmetries of the distribution of aaRSs in each code. The symmetry groups of aaRSs in each code are described, until the symmetries of the SGC display a mirror symmetry. Considering both Extended RNA codes the 20 aaRSs were already present before the Last Universal Ancestor. These findings reveal intricacies in the diversification of aaRSs accompanied by the evolution of the genetic code.

Structural Computational Analysis of the Natural History of Class I aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases Suggests their Role in Establishing the Genetic Code

The evolutionary history of Class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) through the reconstruction of ancestral sequences is presented. From structural molecular modeling, we sought to understand its relationship with the acceptor arms and the tRNA anticodon loop, how this relationship was established, and the possible implications in determining the genetic code and the translation system. The results of the molecular docking showed that in 7 out 9 aaRS, the acceptor arm and the anticodon loop bond practically in the same region. Domain accretion process in aaRS and repositioning of interactions between tRNAs and aaRS are illustrated. Based on these results, we propose that the operational code and the anticodon code coexisted, competing for the aaRS catalytic region, while consequently contributed to the stabilization of these proteins.

Origin of the 16S Ribosomal Molecule from Ancestor tRNAs

We tested the hypothesis that concatemers of ancestral tRNAs gave rise to the 16S ribosomal RNA. We built an ancestral sequence of proto-tRNAs that showed a significant identity of 51.69% and a percentage of structural identity of 0.941 with the 3' upper domain of 16S ribosomal molecule. We also propose a hypothesis in which the small ribosomal subunit emerged by proto-tRNA fusion and worked as a point to bind RNAs in an open structure configuration. In this context, the two ribosomal subunits initially worked independently, and that the subunit junction, with consequent primitive ribosome formation, was mediated by interactions with tRNA molecules during the primordial genetic code formation.

Origin of the 16S Ribosomal Molecule from Ancestor tRNAs

We tested the hypothesis that concatemers of ancestral tRNAs gave rise to the 16S ribosomal RNA. We built an ancestral sequence of proto-tRNAs that showed a significant identity of 51.69% and a percentage of structural identity of 0.941 with the 16S ribosomal molecule. We also propose a hypothesis for the emergence of translation.

Information theory unveils the evolution of tRNA identity elements in the three domains of life

We determined the identity elements of each tRNA isoacceptor for the three domains of life: Eubacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya. Our analyses encompass the most updated and curated available databases using an information theory approach. We obtained a collection of identity clusters for each of the isoacceptors of the 20 canonical amino acids for the three major domains of life. The identity clusters for all isoacceptors are compared within and among the three domains to determine their pattern of differentiation and to shed light on the evolution of the identity elements.

Origin of the 16S Ribosomal Molecule from Ancestor tRNAs

We tested the hypothesis that concatemers of ancestral tRNAs gave rise to the 16S ribosomal RNA. We built an ancestral sequence of proto-tRNAs that showed a significant identity of 51.69% and a percentage of structural identity of 0.941 with the 16S ribosomal molecule. We also propose a hypothesis for the emergence of translation.

The influence of different types of translational inaccuracies on the genetic code structure

BACKGROUND

The standard genetic code is a recipe for assigning unambiguously 21 labels, i.e. amino acids and stop translation signal, to 64 codons. However, at early stages of the translational machinery development, the codons did not have to be read unambiguously and the early genetic codes could have contained some ambiguous assignments of codons to amino acids. Therefore, the goal of this work was to obtain the genetic code structures which could have evolved assuming different types of inaccuracy of the translational machinery starting from unambiguous assignments of codons to amino acids.

RESULTS

We developed a theoretical model assuming that the level of uncertainty of codon assignments can gradually decrease during the simulations. Since it is postulated that the standard code has evolved to be robust against point mutations and mistranslations, we developed three simulation scenarios assuming that such errors can influence one, two or three codon positions. The simulated codes were selected using the evolutionary algorithm methodology to decrease coding ambiguity and increase their robustness against mistranslation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the typical codon block structure of the genetic code could have evolved to decrease the ambiguity of amino acid to codon assignments and to increase the fidelity of reading the genetic information. However, the robustness to errors was not the decisive factor that influenced the genetic code evolution because it is possible to find theoretical codes that minimize the reading errors better than the standard genetic code.

Evolution of the genetic code based on conservative changes of codons, amino acids, and aminoacyl tRNA synthetases

The genetic code, as arranged in the standard tabular form, displays a non-random structure relating to the characteristics of the amino acids. An alternative arrangement can be made by organizing the code according to aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), codons, and reverse complement codons, which illuminates a coevolutionary process that led to the contemporary genetic code. As amino acids were added to the genetic code, they were recognized by aaRSs that interact with stereochemically similar amino acids. Single nucleotide changes in the codons and anticodons were favored over more extensive changes, such that there was a logical stepwise progression in the evolution of the genetic code. The model presented traces the evolution of the genetic code accounting for these steps. Amino acid frequencies in ancient proteins and the preponderance of GNN codons in mRNAs for ancient proteins indicate that the genetic code began with alanine, aspartate, glutamate, glycine, and valine, with alanine being in the highest proportions. In addition to being consistent in terms of conservative changes in codon nucleotides, the model also is consistent with respect to aaRS classes, aaRS attachment to the tRNA, amino acid stereochemistry, and to a large extent with amino acid physicochemistry, and biochemical pathways.