Long-term safety of antihypertensive therapy

Exosomes and Macrophages: Bidirectional Mutual Regulation in the Treatment of Diabetic Complications

Purpose

The bidirectional regulation of macrophages and exosomes provides a meaningful research direction for the treatment of complications arising from both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, there is currently no comprehensive evaluation of the bidirectional regulatory role of macrophages and exosomes in diabetic complications. In this review, we aim to provide the detailed process of the bidirectional regulation mechanism of macrophages and exosomes, and how macrophage-associated exosomes use this mechanism to make it better applied to clinical practice through biotechnology.

Methods

Therefore, we summarized the bidirectional regulation mechanism of macrophages and exosomes and the application based on the bidirectional regulation mechanism from two aspects of inflammation and insulin resistance.

Results

As key regulators of the immune system, macrophages are crucial in the progression of diabetic complications due to their significant impact on the regulation of cellular metabolism, inflammation, and insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, exosomes, as innovative mediators of intercellular communication, transport miRNAs, proteins, and various bioactive molecules, influencing the occurrence and progression of diabetic complications through the regulation of inflammation and insulin resistance. The bidirectional regulation between macrophages and exosomes provides a promising pathway for the treatment of diabetic complications aimed at regulating the immune response and improving insulin sensitivity.

Conclusions

Understanding the complexity of the interaction between macrophages and exosomes can advance the treatment of diabetic complications and drug development, and bringing more innovative and effective treatment strategies for diabetic complications.

Risk factors and ambulatory outcome in ischemic stroke patients with pre-stroke depression

OBJECTIVE

It is well known that post-stroke depression might be a negative factor for stroke recovery, however there is limited evidence to establish the link between pre-stroke depression and stroke outcome such motor recovery. The objective is to determine clinical risk factors in ischemic stroke patients with pre-stroke depression that are associated functional ambulatory outcome.

METHODS

Data from acute ischemic patients from a regional stroke registry were collected for consecutive recombinant tissue plasminogen activator(rtPA)-treated acute ischemic stroke patients between January 2010 and June 2016. Logistic regression model was used to predict risk factors that served as predictive variables, while the increase or reduce odds of improvement in ambulatory outcome was considered as the primary outcome. Multicollinearity and possible interactions among the independent variables were analyzed using the variance inflation factor.

RESULTS

A total of 1446 patients were eligible for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and 596 of these patients received rtPA. Of the 596 ischemic stroke patients, 286 patients presented with recent pre-stroke depression, 310 had no pre-stroke depression. Carotid artery stenosis (OR = 11.577, 95% CI, 1.281-104.636, P = 0.029) and peripheral vascular disease (OR = 18.040, 95% CI, 2.956-110.086, P = 0.002) were more likely to be associated with increase odds of improvement in ambulation in patients with no pre-stroke depression treated with rtPA, while antihypertensive medications (OR = 0.192, 95% CI, 0.035-1.067, P = 0.050),previous TIA (OR = 0.177, 95% CI, 0.038-0.818, P = 0.027), and congestive heart failure (OR = 0. 0.160, 95% CI, 0.030-0.846, P = 0.031) were associated with reduced odds of improvement in ambulation. In addition, carotid artery stenosis (OR = 0.078, 95% CI, 0.10-0.614, P = 0.015, congestive heart failure (OR = 0.217, 95% CI, 0.318-0.402, P = 0.030), previous TIA (OR = 0.444, 95% CI, 0.517-0.971, P = 0.012), higher NIHSS scores ((OR = 0.887, 95% CI, 0.830-0.948, P < 0.001), and antihypertensive medications (OR = 0.810, 95% CI, 0.401-0.529, P = 0.019) were associated with the reduced odd of improvement in ambulation in an ischemic stroke population with pre-stroke depression treated with rtPA.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that more risk factors were associated with the decreased odds of an improvement in ambulation following thrombolytic therapy in an ischemic stroke population with pre-stroke depression when compared with those without pre-stroke depression. This finding maybe helpful in the development of management strategies to increase the use of thrombolytic therapy for pre-stroke depressed ischemic stroke to increased their eligibility for rtPA.

Antihypertensive Drugs and the Risk of Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study

We sought to assess the association between common antihypertensive drugs and the risk of incident cancer in treated hypertensive patients. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, the risk of cancer incidence was analyzed in patients with hypertension who were initially free of cancer and used the following antihypertensive drug classes: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs); angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); beta blockers (BBs); calcium channel blockers (CCBs); and diuretics. During a median follow-up of 8.6 years, there were 4513 (6.4%) overall cancer incidences from an initial 70,549 individuals taking antihypertensive drugs. ARB use was associated with a decreased risk for overall cancer in a crude model (hazard ratio (HR): 0.744, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.696-0.794) and a fully adjusted model (HR: 0.833, 95% CI: 0.775-0.896) compared with individuals not taking ARBs. Other antihypertensive drugs, including ACEIs, CCBs, BBs, and diuretics, did not show significant associations with incident cancer overall. The long-term use of ARBs was significantly associated with a reduced risk of incident cancer over time. The users of common antihypertensive medications were not associated with an increased risk of cancer overall compared to users of other classes of antihypertensive drugs. ARB use was independently associated with a decreased risk of cancer overall compared to other antihypertensive drugs.

Retrospective Review of Exceptions for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Recommendations for a Diabetic Medicare Population

BACKGROUND

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) antagonists are recommended for people with diabetes and hypertension or with elevated urinary albumin excretion. RAS antagonists are beneficial for some, yet clinically inappropriate for others. The percentage of patients for whom RASs are clinically inappropriate has not been compared across health plans.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) identify reasons why RAS therapy was not recommended and (b) compare exception percentages between health plans.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis included Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes, enrolled in health plans (n = 96) participating in a university-based medication therapy management (MTM) program between January 1 and December 31, 2013. The MTM program evaluated patient eligibility for RAS therapy via (1) a clinically derived software system assessing demographics and medication history, and (2) telepharmacist-delivered medication reviews. The MTM program database calculated the number of patients with diabetes and percentage of RAS therapy exceptions.

RESULTS

An average of 55% of patients with diabetes qualified for MTM (range: 19%-88%). Of the 218,589 eligible, 94,359 had 1 or more reasons contraindicating RAS therapy (exception). For an average of 29% of patients, it was inappropriate to recommend the addition of an RAS antagonist; the overall exception rate ranged from 3% to 83%, suggesting a wide variation of exception rates for all health plans.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial difference existed across health plans where RAS therapy was considered clinically inappropriate to recommend for patients with diabetes. Future research must examine variations in therapy exceptions to understand the effect of encouraging broad-population RAS antagonist use.

DISCLOSURES

SinfoníaRx provided funding for this project. Wild, Boesen, and Werner are employed by SinfoniaRx, which provided grant funding to the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy for the conduct of this study. This project was presented at the AMCP 27th Annual Meeting and Expo; April 8-10, 2015; San Diego, CA.

Synthesis and vasodilator activity of 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones bearing urea, thiourea, and sulfonylurea moieties

A series of novel 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones bearing urea, thiourea, and sulfonylurea moieties were synthesized and pharmacologically evaluated as vasodilator agents. The most interesting vasodilators were the thiourea derivatives 6a and 6b and the urea derivatives 6f–6i and 7f–7h, although the ureas were relatively more active than thioureas. Twenty-fold more active than diazoxide, the urea 6g was the most potent vasodilator (EC50 = 0.983 ± 0.061 μmol/L) and proved to act as a voltage-gated calcium channel blocker. The lack of activity of sulfonylureas, 6k and 7j, could be attributed to their partial ionization at the physiological pH because of their acidic character. It should be interesting to investigate a larger number of compounds, including N-methylated sulfonylureas, to increase the vasodilator activity and to explore other biological models.

Challenges in the Management of Hypertension in Older Populations

The prevalence of hypertension increases with age making it a significant health concern for older persons. Aging involves a range of physiological changes such as increases in arterial stiffness, widening pulse pressure, changes in renin and aldosterone levels, decreases in renal salt excretion, declining in renal function, changes in the autonomic nervous system sensitivity and function and changes to endothelial function all of which may not only affect blood pressure but may also affect individual response to pharmacotherapy used to manage hypertension and prevent end organ damage and other complications associated with poor blood pressure control.Unlike many chronic conditions where there is limited evidence for management in older populations, there is good evidence regarding the management of hypertension in the elderly. The findings from multiple large, robust trials have provided a solid evidence-base regarding the management of hypertension in older adults, showing that reduction of blood pressure in older hypertensive populations is associated with reduced mortality and morbidity. Diuretics, agents action on the renin angiotensin system, beta blockers and calcium channel blockers have all been well studied in older populations both in view of the benefits associated with blood pressure lowering and the risks associated with associated adverse events. While all antihypertensive agents will lower blood pressure, when managing hypertension in older persons the choice of agent is dependent not only on the ability to lower blood pressure but also on the potential for harm with older persons. Understanding such potential harms in older populations is essential with older persons experiencing increased sensitivity to many of the adverse effects such as dizziness associated with the use of antihypertensive agents.Despite the wealth of evidence regarding the benefits of managing hypertension in the old and very old, a significant proportion of older individuals with hypertension have suboptimal BP control. While there is good evidence supporting blood pressure lowering in older antihypertensive agents, these have not yet been optimally translated fully into clinical guidelines and clinical practice. There appear to be considerable differences between guidelines in terms of the guidance given to clinicians. Differences in interpretation of the evidence, as well as differences in study design and populations all contribute to differences in the guideline recommendations with respect to older populations, despite the strength of the underlying scientific evidence. Differences around who is considered "old" and what BP targets and management are considered appropriate may lead to confusion among clinicians and further contribute to the evidence-practice lag.

Endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and heart failure

Outcomes for heart failure (HF) patients remain suboptimal. No known therapy improves mortality in acute HF and HF with preserved ejection fraction; the most recent HF trial results have been negative or neutral. Improvement in surrogate markers has not necessarily translated into better outcomes. To translate breakthroughs with potential therapies into clinical benefit, a better understanding of the pathophysiology establishing the foundation of benefit is necessary. Vascular function plays a central role in the development and progression of HF. Endothelial function and nitric oxide availability affect myocardial function, systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, and coronary and renal circulation. Arterial stiffness modulates ventricular loading conditions and diastolic function, key components of HF with preserved ejection. Endothelial function and arterial stiffness may therefore serve as important physiological targets for new HF therapies and facilitate patient selection for improved application of existing agents.

Critical review of cancer risk associated with angiotensin receptor blocker therapy

The role of drugs in new cancer occurrence and cancer-related death is a major concern. Recently, a meta-analysis raised the possibility that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) might have an adverse effect on patients. This generated a significant debate until the publication of two further meta-analyses, neither of which demonstrated an increased risk of new cancer occurrence or cancer-related death with the use of ARBs in patients with hypertension, heart failure, and/or nephropathy. This illustrates that the results of meta-analyses should be interpreted cautiously and critically as bias, such as selection bias, might lead to erroneous conclusions. Overall, the bulk of evidence today indicates that ARBs are not associated with increased cancer risk.

Clinical trials of antihypertensives: Nature of control and design

This paper reviews the critical issues in the control and design of antihypertension (anti-HT) clinical trials. The international guidelines and current clinical and biostatistical practices were reviewed for relevant clinical, design, end-point assessments and regulatory issues. The results are grouped mainly into ethical, protocol and assessment issues. Ethical issues arise as placebo-controlled trials (PCTs) for HT-lowering agents in patients with moderate to severe HT are undertaken. Patients with organ damage due to HT should not be included in long-term PCT. Active-control trials, however, are suitable for all randomized subsets of patients, including men and women, and different ethnic and age groups. Severity subgroups must be studied separately with consideration to specific study design. Mortality and morbidity outcome studies are not required in anti-HT trials except when significant mortality and cardiovascular morbidity are suspected. Generally, changes in both systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP) at the end of the dosing interval from the baseline are compared between the active and the control arms as the primary endpoint of anti-HT effect. Onset of the anti-HT effect can be studied as the secondary endpoint. For maintenance of efficacy, long-term studies of ≥6 months need to be undertaken. Error-free measurement of BP is a serious issue as spontaneous changes in BP are large and active drug effect on diastolic BP is often small. Placebo-controlled short-term studies (of ~12 weeks) for dose-response and titration are very useful. Safety studies must be very vigilant on hypotension, orthostatic hypotension and effects on heart. In dose-response studies, at least three doses in addition to placebo should be used to well characterize the benefits and side-effects.

Is vascular stiffness a target for therapy?

BACKGROUND

Early cardiovascular disease starts in the endothelium leading to functional changes in the vasculature. These changes can be depicted by assessment of arterial stiffness or elasticity. There are several techniques to assess arterial stiffness. Increased arterial stiffness or decreased arterial elasticity has been associated with cardiovascular risk factors. There is now evidence that small artery elasticity is a strong predictor for arterial hypertension. Moreover arterial elasticity provides extra prognostic information beyond arterial blood pressure measurement. Arterial stiffness attenuation may reflect the true reduction of arterial wall damage.

RESULTS

ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, aldosterone antagonists and calcium antagonists have favorable effects in improving arterial elasticity, while beta-blockers have an inverse effect. Diuretics have not been evaluated. Lipid lowering therapy, some antidiabetic therapy have shown to reduce arterial stiffness. Inflammatory and infectious diseases have been associated with vascular inflammation and consequently increase in arterial stiffness. The effect of anti-inflammatory agents and antiretroviral therapy on arterial stiffness is under investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of arterial stiffness will not only be helpful in the detection of early vascular disease but also as a tool in the selection and follow-up monitoring of therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing or delaying progression of vascular disease.

Cost effectiveness of angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy in patients with hypertension in the Netherlands: a comparative analysis using clinical trial and drug utilization data

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Health gains and related cost savings achieved by optimizing treatment in hypertensive patients is highly important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the costs and cost effectiveness of treatment with angiotensin II receptor antagonists (angiotensin II receptor blockers [ARBs]) in patients with essential hypertension and to compare within-trial with real-life dosing of ARBs.

METHODS

Cost effectiveness was estimated based on a published clinical trial comparing the BP-lowering effects of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan. BP lowering after 8 weeks of treatment was entered into the Framingham risk functions to estimate cardiovascular complications after 1 and 5 years, using an international health economics model that was adapted to the Netherlands. Dutch costs (2006 values) and complications derived from the model were discounted at 4% and 1.5%, respectively, and cost effectiveness was expressed in net costs per cardiovascular complication averted. In a drug-utilization study, pharmacy dispensing records were used to evaluate differences between within-trial and daily-practice dosing and related costs for treatment in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks, the trial-based analysis showed that treatment with olmesartan versus losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan resulted in a significantly larger decrease in BP (11.5 vs 8.2, 7.9 and 9.9 mmHg [p < 0.05], respectively) and consequently more complications averted. Cost effectiveness for olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan was estimated at euro39,100, euro77,100, euro70,700, and euro50,900 per cardiovascular complication averted, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis indicated the most favorable cost-effectiveness outcome for olmesartan, with lower costs and less cardiovascular complications for olmesartan compared with the other three ARBs. The drug-utilization analysis showed that the dosing followed within clinical trials was not found in daily practice. On average, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan were administered at doses above those used in clinical trials, whereas olmesartan was dosed lower than in clinical trials, resulting in relatively lower costs.

CONCLUSION

Based on the exact trial data, olmesartan was estimated to be the most favorable option of the four ARBs based on within-trial decreases in BP levels after 8 weeks and in terms of cost-effectiveness for this particular Dutch setting. However, for definite conclusions to be drawn, this hypothesis-generating study requires confirmation from further prospective studies comparing ARBs based on comparable BP control and including hard endpoints.

High-fat diet and hydrochlorothiazide increase oxidative stress in brain of rats

This study evaluated the effect of possible synergic interaction between high fat diet (HF) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on biochemical parameters of oxidative stress in brain. Rats were fed for 16 weeks with a control diet or with an HF, both supplemented with different doses of HCTZ (0.4, 1.0, and 4.0 g kg(-1) of diet). HF associated with HCTZ caused a significant increase in lipid peroxidation and blood glucose levels. In addition, HF ingestion was associated with an increase in cerebral lipid peroxidation, vitamin C and non-protein thiol groups (NPSH) levels. There was an increase in vitamin C as well as NPSH levels in HCTZ (1.0 and 4.0 g kg(-1) of diet) and HF plus HCTZ groups. Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity of HCTZ (4.0 g kg(-1) of diet) and HCTZ plus HF-fed animals was significantly inhibited. Our data indicate that chronic intake of a high dose of HCTZ (4 g kg(-1) of diet) or HF change biochemical indexes of oxidative stress in rat brain. Furthermore, high-fat diets consumption and HCTZ treatment have interactive effects on brain, showing that a long-term intake of high-fat diets can aggravate the toxicity of HCTZ.

Blood pressure in young adulthood and later disability pension. A population‐based study on 867 672 men from Sweden

Hypertension is a common chronic condition and can lead to an economic burden for society because of the costs of treatment for high blood pressure and most likely also because of disabilities related to hypertension and its co-morbidities. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent moderate/severe hypertension in young adulthood increases the risk of becoming a disability pensioner later in life. All Swedish men born 1951 to 1970, who had their systolic blood pressure measured at age 18-19 years in the compulsory military conscription examination were followed from 1990 to 2001 with respect to receiving disability pension. Among 867 672 men (84.3% of the target population), the hazard ratio was 1.33 (95% CI 1.15-1.52) for being granted disability pension because of moderate/severe hypertension compared with men with normal systolic blood pressure after adjustment for conscription centre, body mass index and socio-economic conditions in childhood and adulthood. Men with mild hypertension had also an increased hazard ratio (1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13) compared with men with normal systolic blood pressure. This study showed that hypertension in young adulthood increased the risk of disability pension in later life.

Drugs for the perioperative control of hypertension: current issues and future directions

The management of hypertension continues to pose important challenges. Recent developments have established the importance of more rigorous blood pressure control in the community. In the perioperative setting, hypertension has long been recognised as undesirable, although the adverse impact of high blood pressure on the acute risks of elective surgery may have been previously overstated.A number of agents and techniques are available to control blood pressure perioperatively. These include principally general and regional anaesthetics, alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, peripheral alpha(1)- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists, dopamine D(1A)-receptor agonists (fenoldopam), and nitric oxide donors. Recent years have seen important developments in the receptor selectivity of new compounds and in pharmacokinetics, particularly esterase metabolism. The future study of genomics may enable us to identify patients at risk for hypertension-related adverse events and target therapies most effectively to these high-risk groups.

Review: Concomitant calcium entry blockade and inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system: a rational and effective means for treating hypertension

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension is effective in preventing cardiovascular and renal complications. Calcium antagonists (CAs) and blockers of the renin-angiotensin system [angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II antagonists (ARBs)] are widely used today to initiate antihypertensive treatment but, when given as monotherapy, do not suffice in most patients to normalise blood pressure (BP). Combining a CA and either an ACE-inhibitor or an ARB considerably increases the antihypertensive efficacy, but not at the expense of a deterioration of tolerability. Several fixed-dose combinations are available (CA + ACE-inhibitors: amlodipine + benazepril, felodipine + ramipril, verapamil + trandolapril; CA + ARB: amlodipine + valsartan). They are expected not only to improve BP control, but also to facilitate long-term adherence with ON antihypertensive therapy, thereby providing renal damage caused by high BP. maximal protection against the cardiovascular and renal damage caused by high BP.

Chronic AT1-receptor blockade does not alter cerebral oxygen supply/demand ratio during cardiopulmonary bypass in hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

The angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonist candesartan has been hypothesized to alter vasopressor requirements and brain-blood flow by changing cerebrovascular autoregulation. Therefore, we assessed the effects of a pre-anaesthetic treatment course with candesartan on cerebral arterial-jugular bulb oxygen content difference, middle cerebral artery blood velocity, and vasopressor requirements in hypertensive patients undergoing elective on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the effects of candesartan (8 mg po/d, given for 6-8 days before surgery) in 35 hypertensive patients. The mean arterial pressure was maintained above 60 mmHg by bolus administration of phenylephrine, if required, and dosages were recorded.

RESULTS

Candesartan did not significantly alter oxygen content difference across the cerebral circulation, mean middle cerebral artery blood velocity during cardiopulmonary bypass, or phenylephrine requirements either before (0.0067 microg/kg/min+/-0.0042 vs. 0.0056 microg/kg/min+/-0.0049, P=0.48) or during cardiopulmonary bypass (0.0240 microg/kg/min+/-0.0240 vs. 0.0250 microg/kg/min+/-0.0190, P=0.97) compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Thus, a 6-8-day treatment course with candesartan does not alter global cerebral perfusion and oxygen supply/demand ratio during cardiopulmonary bypass, or vasopressor requirements in hypertensive patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and no deleterious consequences of AT1-receptor blockade were detected.

A thrombospondin-1 antagonist of transforming growth factor-beta activation blocks cardiomyopathy in rats with diabetes and elevated angiotensin II

In diabetes and hypertension, the induction of increased transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) activity due to glucose and angiotensin II is a significant factor in the development of fibrosis and organ failure. We showed previously that glucose and angiotensin II induce the latent TGF-beta activator thrombospondin-1 (TSP1). Because activation of latent TGF-beta is a major means of regulating TGF-beta, we addressed the role of TSP1-mediated TGF-beta activation in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy exacerbated by abdominal aortic coarctation in a rat model of type 1 diabetes using a peptide antagonist of TSP1-dependent TGF-beta activation. This surgical manipulation elevates initial blood pressure and angiotensin II. The hearts of these rats had increased TSP1, collagen, and TGF-beta activity, and cardiac function was diminished. A peptide antagonist of TSP1-dependent TGF-beta activation prevented progression of cardiac fibrosis and improved cardiac function by reducing TGF-beta activity. These data suggest that TSP1 is a significant mediator of fibrotic complications of diabetes associated with stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system, and further studies to assess the blockade of TSP1-dependent TGF-beta activation as a potential antifibrotic therapeutic strategy are warranted.