Association between intensive glycemic control and mortality in elderly diabetic patients in the primary care: A retrospective cohort study

Association between glycated hemoglobin and risk of all-cause mortality in community patients with type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

To analyze the association between HbA1c level and the risk of all-cause mortality in community patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to provide a scientific basis for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the community.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a Zhejiang rural community type 2 diabetes mellitus cohort, a total of 10,310 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with complete baseline and follow-up data were selected. The Cox proportional hazards regression model and the restricted cubic spline model were used to evaluate the relationship between the HbA1c level and the risk of all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 5.5 years, 971 patients died. With HbA1c levels of 6.5-7.0% as the reference, after adjusting for relevant confounding factors, the HR(95%CI) of all-cause mortality with HbA1c levels of <5.5%, 5.5-6.5%, 7.0-8.0%, 8.0-9.0%, and ≥9.0% were 1.53 (1.08-2.15), 0.97 (0.79-1.21), 1.14 (0.92-1.41), 1.44 (1.14-1.83), and 2.08 (1.68-2.58), respectively. The HbA1c level was associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in a "J-shaped" manner. The risk of all-cause mortality was lowest when the HbA1c was 6.5-7.0%, and increased significantly when the HbA1c was ≥ 8.0% and the HbA1c was < 5.5% (P < 0.05). The risk of all-cause death in the HbA1c 5.5-6.5% group and the 7.0-8.0% group was not significant compared with the reference group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The HbA1c levels were associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus in a "J-shaped" manner, a too high or a too low HbA1c level could increase the risk of death. Attention should be paid to the individual evaluation of patients and the setting of appropriate glycemic control goals.

Intensive glycemic control and macrovascular, microvascular, hypoglycemia complications and mortality in older (age ≥60years) or frail adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trial and observation studies

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommend individualized HbA1c targets to take into account patient age or frailty. We synthesized evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies for intensive glycemic control (HbA1c target ≤58 mmol/mol) versus standard care, in elderly (age ≥60 years) or frail adults with T2D.

METHODS

Searches were performed utilizing recognized terms for T2D, frailty, older age, and HbA1c control and outcomes of interest. Meta-analysis was performed where possible. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, severe hypoglycemia, and hospital admission rates. Vascular complications, cognitive decline, and falls/fractures were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

7,528 studies were identified of which 15 different clinical studies were selected. No difference was noted in all-cause mortality with intensive control (pooled hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.03), but risk of severe hypoglycemia increased (2.45, 2.22-2.72). Intensive control was associated reductions in microvascular (0.73, 0.68-0.79) and macrovascular complications (0.84, 0.79-0.89). Outcome data for risk of hospitalization, cognition, and falls/fractures were limited.

CONCLUSION

Intensive glycemic control was associated with reduced rates of complications but increased severe hypoglycemia. Significant heterogeneity exists and the impact of different drug regimens is unclear. Caution is needed when setting glycemic targets in elderly or frail individuals.

Predictors of mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes in Jordan

BACKGROUND

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common metabolic disease associated with increased risk of mortality.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine predictors of mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes in the north of Jordan.

METHODS

Electronic data files for diabetes patients admitted between the period of 2014-2018 at a tertiary center in the north of Jordan were reviewed. Patient's characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, use of medications and mortality rate were collected.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients (n = 957) was 60.99 ± 0.37 (mean ± sem). Most of patients had multiple risk factors and underlying cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Mortality rate was 10.1%. Univariate predictors of mortality included age, chronic kidney disease (CKD), acute kidney injury, hypertension, heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease, venous thromboembolism (VTE), stroke, atrial fibrillation (AF), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As the number of CVDs increases, mortality rate also increases (Odd ratio 2.0, p < 0.0001). Use of insulin, aspirin, ACEi/ARBS, beta blockers, and diuretics were also associated with mortality. Fasting glucose and percentage of glycated hemoglobin were not associated with mortality. By multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for confounders and collinearity; age, HF, AF, COPD, VTE, and CKD were associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Key risk factors of mortality are CVDs and CKD indicating that the primary step of management should focus on optimizing risk factors to prevent diabetes complications and death.

Adherence to non-pharmacological treatment is associated with the goals of cardiovascular control and better eating habits in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To identify the association of diabetes education or medical nutrition therapy with the goals of control of cardiovascular risk indicators and dietary habits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Analytical cross-sectional study in 395 primary care patients. HbA1c, fasting glucose and lipid profile, blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, and body composition were measured. Dietary habits were measured using the «Instrument for measuring lifestyle in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus» (IMEVID), in the nutrition dimension. Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and diabetes education (DE) were considered as received by the patient when provided in their healthcare clinic.

RESULTS

Women comprised 68% of the patients, with a median of 6 years from diabetes diagnosis. Of the patients, 21% received DE and MNT, 28% DE or MNT, and 51% received neither. The HbA1c was lower in the patients with DE and MNT (7.7% ± 1.9% vs. 8.7% ± 2.3%, 8.4% ± 2.2%; p = .003) respectively. In the patients with DE and MNT, a higher proportion took physical exercise, consumed less tobacco, and had better dietary habits (p < .05). Patients who received DE and MNT achieved HbA1c and HDL-c control levels. A greater risk of HbA1c > 7% was identified when they only received DE or MNT or neither, a longer time since diagnosis of the disease and less frequent adherence to a diet to control the disease (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Diabetes education and medical nutritional therapy favour the goal of cardiovascular risk control and better dietary habits in the patient with type 2 diabetes.