Adherence to antidiabetic treatment in primary health care in individuals with type 2 diabetes. A survey including socio-demographic, patient related and clinical factors

The prevalence of adherence to insulin therapy in patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adherence to insulin therapy is crucial to achieving good glycemic control for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). A comprehensive estimation of adherence to insulin therapy in patients with diabetes is currently lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prevalence of adherence to insulin therapy in patients with both T1D and T2D.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses from the inception of each database to August 2023. Cross-sectional studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) conducted in patients with T1D or T2D; (2) reported adherence to insulin therapy. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data was used to assess the quality of included studies. Pooled estimates of the prevalence of adherence to insulin were calculated as a percentage together with a 95 % confidence interval (95%CI) using a random-effect model. All analyses were conducted using STATA 15 (College Station, Texas, United States); PROSPERO (CRD42022322323).

RESULTS

Search results yielded 14,914 articles, of these 57 studies with a total of 125,241 patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall estimated prevalence of adherence to insulin therapy in both types of diabetes was 55.37 % (95%CI: 48.55 %-62.19 %). The adherence for T1D was 52.63 % (95 % CI: 37.37 %-67.87 %), whereas the adherence for T2D was 52.55 % (95 % CI: 43.08 %-62.01 %). The prevalence of adherence in lower middle-income countries was 56.79 % (95 % CI: 27.85 %-85.74 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prevalence of adherence to insulin therapy was remarkably low. This requires attention from healthcare practitioners and policymakers to implement appropriate strategic approaches to improve adherence to insulin therapy.

Quantification of insulin adherence in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: A systematic review

AIMS

This systematic review aims to identify current methods used for the assessment of insulin adherence in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. The primary goal is to offer recommendations for clinical practice to improve quantification of adherence.

METHODS

The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022334134). PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched on 15 November 2022 and included three blocks: Type 2 diabetes, insulin, and adherence. We considered primary full-text studies describing an assessment method and a threshold for assessment of insulin adherence in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

A final sample of 50 studies were included. Identified methods fell into four categories: self-report, pharmacy claims, inulin count, and data from an insulin pen device. Commonly reported methods included: The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, the (adjusted) Medication Possession Ratio, and the Proportions of Days Covered. A threshold of <80% was used to define non-adherence in nearly half of the studies. Yet, several thresholds were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Most available methods for assessing insulin adherence in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes are severely limited in providing in-depth insights into timing, dosing size, injection patterns, and adherence behavior. However, recognizing diverse types of non-adherence is crucial, as they denote unique behavioral entities requiring targeted intervention. Employing insulin injection data (e.g., from a smart insulin pen cap) to underlie an assessment method is a potential new approach to objectively assess insulin timing and dosing adherence in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Impact of a multicomponent integrated care delivery program on diabetes care goals achievement: a primary care quality improvement initiative

AIM

To evaluate the impact of multicomponent integrated care (MIC) delivery program in a primary care real-life setting on diabetes care goals.

METHODS

Patients with T2D and usual primary care from the public health system in Mexico were invited to participate in a five-month ambulatory MIC quality initiative (DIAbetes Empowerment and Improvement of Care program, DIABEMPIC).

RESULTS

841 patients who finished the program and with complete data were analyzed. The patients had a mean decrease in hemoglobin A1c, systolic and diastolic pressure, and LDL-cholesterol of 2.4%, 9 mmHg, 3 mmHg, and 22.5 mg/dL, respectively (p < 0.001). The achievement of the optimal triple target goal increased from 1.8% to 26.7% (p < 0.001). In the adjusted analysis, the diabetes knowledge and global self-care behavior score post-intervention, as well as the increment of global self-care behavior score were associated with the optimal composite risk factor control achievement.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of diabetes therapeutic education interventions to improve self-care behaviors along with adequate treatment intensification in diabetes care are fundamental to attaining optimal risk factor control and attenuating disease burden.