1
|
Stoltz DJ, Gallo AE, Lum G, Mendoza J, Esquivel CO, Bonham A. Technical Variant Liver Transplant Utilization for Pediatric Recipients: Equal Graft Survival to Whole Liver Transplants and Promotion of Timely Transplantation Only When Performed at High-volume Centers. Transplantation 2024; 108:703-712. [PMID: 37635278 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technical variant liver transplantation (TVLT) is a strategy to mitigate persistent pediatric waitlist mortality in the United States, although its implementation remains stagnant. This study investigated the relationship between TVLT utilization, transplant center volume, and graft survival. METHODS Pediatric liver transplant recipients from 2010 to 2020 (n = 5208) were analyzed using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Transplant centers were categorized according to the average number of pediatric liver transplants performed per year (high-volume, ≥5; low-volume, <5). Graft survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of graft failure. RESULTS High-volume centers demonstrated equivalent whole liver transplant and TVLT graft survival ( P = 0.057) and significantly improved TVLT graft survival compared with low-volume centers ( P < 0.001). Transplantation at a low-volume center was significantly associated with graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.24; P = 0.007 in patients <12 y old and 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.87; P = 0.013 in patients ≥12 y old). A subset of high-volume centers with a significantly higher rate of TVLT use demonstrated a 23% reduction in waitlist mortality. CONCLUSIONS Prompt transplantation with increased TVLT utilization at high-volume centers may reduce pediatric waitlist mortality without compromising graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Stoltz
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Amy E Gallo
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Grant Lum
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Julianne Mendoza
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Carlos O Esquivel
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Andrew Bonham
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beer SS, Wong Vega M. Malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty assessment in pediatric transplantation. Nutr Clin Pract 2024; 39:27-44. [PMID: 38088812 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.11105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Nutrition assessment can be challenging in children with end-stage organ disease and in those requiring an organ transplant. The effect of poor nutrition status can exert long-lasting effects on children with end-stage organ disease requiring transplantation. Malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty are conditions that require provision of optimal nutrition to prevent or support the treatment of these conditions. Unfortunately, the literature on the assessment of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty in pediatric end-stage organ disease is scarce, thus leading to confusion on how to effectively identify them. Recently, the addition of a variety of validated nutrition and functional assessment techniques has assisted with appropriate assessment of these conditions. The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the current literature for pediatric assessment of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty in the setting of solid organ transplantation and provide practicing nutrition clinicians a solid foundation for learning how to effectively assess these conditions with the current literature available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Silver Beer
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Molly Wong Vega
- Renal Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Squires JE, Raghu VK, Mazariegos GV. Optimizing the pediatric transplant candidate. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:43-49. [PMID: 37823752 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Advances in pediatric transplant parallel those in adult populations; however, there remain critical unique considerations and differences that require specialized knowledge and a specific skill set to optimize care afforded to the pediatric transplant candidate. We introduce general themes regarding optimization of the transplant candidate that are unique to children. RECENT FINDINGS The pathologies leading to pediatric organ transplant candidacy differ from adults and a precise understanding of the physiologies and natural histories of such diseases is critical for optimized care. Regardless of etiology, comorbidities including malnutrition, sarcopenia, and developmental delay are seen and often require disease and organ specific approaches to management. Additionally, an understanding of the concepts of developmental immunology and their relevance to transplant is critical. SUMMARY When looking to optimize pretransplant care, awareness of the pediatric-specific challenges by the transplant community in addition to organ- and age-specific management strategies enable the best outcomes for children awaiting solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Squires
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
| | - Vikram K Raghu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
| | - George V Mazariegos
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Department of Transplant Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoeli D, Feldman AG, Choudhury RA, Moore HB, Sundaram SS, Nydam TL, Wachs ME, Pomfret EA, Adams MA, Jackson WE. Can non-directed living liver donation help improve access to grafts and correct socioeconomic disparities in pediatric liver transplantation? Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14428. [PMID: 36329627 PMCID: PMC10132215 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Each year, children die awaiting LT as the demand for grafts exceeds the available supply. Candidates with public health insurance are significantly less likely to undergo both deceased donor LT and D-LLD LT. ND-LLD is another option to gain access to a graft. The aim of this study was to evaluate if recipient insurance type is associated with likelihood of D-LLD versus ND-LLD LT. METHODS The SRTR/OPTN database was reviewed for pediatric LDLT performed between January 1, 2014 (Medicaid expansion era) and December 31, 2019 at centers that performed ≥1 ND-LLD LDLT during the study period. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess relationship between type of living donor (directed vs. non-directed) and recipient insurance. RESULTS Of 299 pediatric LDLT, 46 (15%) were from ND-LLD performed at 18 transplant centers. Fifty-nine percent of ND-LLD recipients had public insurance in comparison to 40% of D-LLD recipients (p = .02). Public insurance was associated with greater odds of ND-LLD in comparison to D-LLD upon multivariable logistic regression (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.23-4.58, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS ND-LLD allows additional children to receive LTs and may help address some of the socioeconomic disparity in pediatric LDLT, but currently account for only a minority of LDLT and are only performed at a few institutions. Initiatives to improve access to both D-LLD and ND-LLD transplants are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dor Yoeli
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Amy G Feldman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatric Medicine, The Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Rashikh A Choudhury
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Hunter B Moore
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Shikha S Sundaram
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatric Medicine, The Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Trevor L Nydam
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael E Wachs
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Megan A Adams
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Whitney E Jackson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ettenger R, Venick RS, Gritsch HA, Alejos JC, Weng PL, Srivastava R, Pearl M. Deceased donor organ allocation in pediatric transplantation: A historical narrative. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27 Suppl 1:e14248. [PMID: 36468338 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the earliest clinical successes in solid organ transplantation, the proper method of organ allocation for children has been a contentious subject. Over the past 30-35 years, the medical and social establishments of various countries have favored some degree of preference for children on the respective waiting lists. However, the specific policies to accomplish this have varied widely and changed frequently between organ type and country. METHODS Organ allocation policies over time were examined. This review traces the reasons behind and the measures/principles put in place to promote early deceased donor transplantation in children. RESULTS Preferred allocation in children has been approached in a variety of ways and with varying degrees of commitment in different solid organ transplant disciplines and national medical systems. CONCLUSION The success of policies to advantage children has varied significantly by both organ and medical system. Further work is needed to optimize allocation strategies for pediatric candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Ettenger
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Robert S Venick
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hans A Gritsch
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Juan C Alejos
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Patricia L Weng
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Rachana Srivastava
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Meghan Pearl
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen CB, Chugh S, Fujiki M, Radhakrishnan K. Overview of Physical, Neurocognitive, and Psychosocial Outcomes in Pediatric Intestinal Failure and Transplantation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2022; 24:145-155. [PMID: 36040624 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-022-00848-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Intestinal failure and transplantation may significantly impact physical, neurocognitive, and psychosocial development in pediatric patients. Currently, there is a paucity of literature on the effects of intestinal failure and transplantation on these aspects of development. This article will review the current literature and discuss the short and long-term impacts as well as interventions to improve clinical outcomes in children with intestinal failure or those undergoing transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS Psychological disorders, neurodevelopmental delay, and social maladaptation are frequently encountered in this patient population. While the main focus is often on medical management, equal emphasis should be placed on other aspects of development such as increasing social support and improving school performance. The transition to adulthood also presents many obstacles for patients and healthcare providers should anticipate challenges such as childbirth, employment, and raising a family. The pre-operative, perioperative, and post-operative periods all represent opportunities for medical intervention. Frequent monitoring of physical, psychosocial, and neurocognitive status helps to improve clinical outcomes and long-term quality of life. Future research should emphasize continued development of multidisciplinary programs and specialized services to help address the physical and psychosocial needs of children with intestinal failure as well as transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles B Chen
- Department of Child Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, 400 N. Keene St, 65201, Columbia, MO, USA.
| | - Shreeya Chugh
- Department of Child Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, 400 N. Keene St, 65201, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Masato Fujiki
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, 44195, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kadakkal Radhakrishnan
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, 44195, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Variability of Care and Access to Transplantation for Children with Biliary Atresia Who Need a Liver Replacement. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11082142. [PMID: 35456234 PMCID: PMC9032543 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims: Biliary atresia (BA) is the commonest single etiology indication for liver replacement in children. As timely access to liver transplantation (LT) remains challenging for small BA children (with prolonged waiting time being associated with clinical deterioration leading to both preventable pre- and post-transplant morbidity and mortality), the care pathway of BA children in need of LT was analyzed—from diagnosis to LT—with particular attention to referral patterns, timing of referral, waiting list dynamics and need for medical assistance before LT. Methods: International multicentric retrospective study. Intent-to-transplant study analyzing BA children who had indication for LT early in life (aged < 3 years at the time of assessment), over the last 5 years (2016−2020). Clinical and laboratory data of 219 BA children were collected from 8 transplant centers (6 in Europe and 2 in USA). Results: 39 patients underwent primary transplants. Children who underwent Kasai in a specialist -but not transplant- center were older at time of referral and at transplant. At assessment for LT, the vast majority of children already were experiencing complication of cirrhosis, and the majority of children needed medical assistance (nutritional support, hospitalization, transfusion of albumin or blood) while waiting for transplantation. Severe worsening of the clinical condition led to the need for requesting a priority status (i.e., Peld Score exception or similar) for timely graft allocation for 76 children, overall (35%). Conclusions: As LT currently results in BA patient survival exceeding 95% in many expert LT centers, the paradigm for BA management optimization and survival have currently shifted to the pre-LT management. The creation of networks dedicated to the timely referral to a pediatric transplant center and possibly centralization of care should be considered, in combination with implementing all different graft type surgeries in specialist centers (including split and living donor LTs) to achieve timely LT in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
|
8
|
Boster JM, Feldman AG, Mack CL, Sokol RJ, Sundaram SS. Malnutrition in Biliary Atresia: Assessment, Management, and Outcomes. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:483-492. [PMID: 34669243 PMCID: PMC8857023 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Children with biliary atresia (BA), particularly infants, are at high risk for malnutrition attributed to a multitude of factors, including poor oral intake and intolerance of enteral feeding, fat malabsorption, abnormal nutrient metabolism, and increased caloric demand. Malnutrition and sarcopenia negatively impact outcomes in BA, leading to higher pretransplant and posttransplant morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes factors contributing to nutritional deficiencies in BA and offers an organized approach to the assessment and management of malnutrition in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia M Boster
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Liver Center, Digestive Health Institute and Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Amy G Feldman
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Liver Center, Digestive Health Institute and Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Cara L Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Liver Center, Digestive Health Institute and Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ronald J Sokol
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Liver Center, Digestive Health Institute and Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Shikha S Sundaram
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Liver Center, Digestive Health Institute and Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vimalesvaran S, Souza LN, Deheragoda M, Samyn M, Day J, Verma A, Vilca-Melendez H, Rela M, Heaton N, Dhawan A. Outcomes of adults who received liver transplant as young children. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 38:100987. [PMID: 34505022 PMCID: PMC8413260 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient and graft survival 20-years after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) are excellent. In children, attainment of normal growth, education and social adaptation to be an independent adult are equally important. This is particularly relevant for children who receive liver transplant at a young age, where infantile-onset liver disease, surgery and immunosuppression can adversely affect growth and neurodevelopment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term physical and psychosocial outcomes of pLT recipients with normal graft function. We coin the term 'meaningful survival'. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study of pLT recipients who received transplants between 1985 and 2004. A 20-year evaluation of physical health (growth, renal function), mental wellbeing and social outcomes (substance abuse, adherence, education, employment) was performed. All patients included were considered to have normal graft function. FINDINGS Eighty-four patients met study criteria. Median age at transplantation was 1.3 years (IQR 0·7-3·3 years), with median duration of follow-up of 20.2 years (18·0-23·5). At median of 20-years, 19 patients (23%) had chronic renal dysfunction and 3 patients (4%) had a BMI of >30 (mean 20·4). Evaluation of long-term psychosocial outcomes demonstrated 22 patients (26%) with mental health disorders. Substance abuse was lower than national average. 62 patients (74%) were in education, employment or training. Overall, only 26% of our cohort achieved a composite outcome of 'meaningful survival'. INTERPRETATION This is the largest reported long-term study of biopsychosocial outcomes of pLT recipients with normal liver biochemistry, with follow-up upon completion of physical growth and senior school education. Importantly, despite normal liver function, many patients did not demonstrate 'meaningful survival'. We must refocus our efforts towards better understanding the long-term outcomes of children. A 'meaningful survival' rather than mere survival should be our goal. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Key Words
- ALP, alkaline phosphatase
- AST, aspartate aminotransferase
- BA, biliary atresia
- BMI, body mass index
- GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase
- IMPARTS, Integrating Mental and Physical Healthcare: Research, Training and Services
- IQR, interquartile range
- Liver transplantation
- SD, standard deviation
- biopsychosocial
- eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate
- long-term
- outcomes
- pLT, pediatric liver transplantation
- pediatric
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunitha Vimalesvaran
- Paediatric Liver, GI and Nutrition Center and Mowat Labs, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Lara Neves Souza
- Liver Histopathology Laboratory, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maesha Deheragoda
- Liver Histopathology Laboratory, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marianne Samyn
- Paediatric Liver, GI and Nutrition Center and Mowat Labs, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Jemma Day
- Paediatric Liver, GI and Nutrition Center and Mowat Labs, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Anita Verma
- Paediatric Liver, GI and Nutrition Center and Mowat Labs, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| | - Hector Vilca-Melendez
- Liver and Intestinal Transplant Surgical Service, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Rela
- Institute of Liver disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Center, Bharat Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Liver Histopathology Laboratory, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anil Dhawan
- Paediatric Liver, GI and Nutrition Center and Mowat Labs, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Katz DT, Torres NS, Chatani B, Gonzalez IA, Chandar J, Miloh T, Rusconi P, Garcia J. Care of Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Overview for Primary Care Providers. Pediatrics 2020; 146:peds.2020-0696. [PMID: 33208494 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-0696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
As the number of living pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients continues to grow, there is an increased likelihood that primary care providers (PCPs) will encounter pediatric SOT recipients in their practices. In addition, as end-stage organ failure is replaced with chronic medical conditions in transplant recipients, there is a need for a comprehensive approach to their management. PCPs can significantly enhance the care of immunosuppressed hosts by advising parents of safety considerations and avoiding adverse drug interactions. Together with subspecialty providers, PCPs are responsible for ensuring that appropriate vaccinations are given and can play an important role in the diagnosis of infections. Through early recognition of rejection and posttransplant complications, PCPs can minimize morbidity. Growth and development can be optimized through frequent assessments and timely referrals. Adherence to immunosuppressive regimens can be greatly improved through reinforcement at every encounter, particularly among adolescents. PCPs can also improve long-term outcomes by easing the transition of pediatric SOT recipients to adult providers. Although guidelines exist for the primary care management of adult SOT recipients, comprehensive guidance is lacking for pediatric providers. In this evidence-based overview, we outline the main issues affecting pediatric SOT recipients and provide guidance for PCPs regarding their management from the first encounter after the transplant to the main challenges that arise in childhood and adolescence. Overall, PCPs can and should use their expertise and serve as an additional layer of support in conjunction with the transplant center for families that are caring for a pediatric SOT recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphna T Katz
- Holtz Children's Hospital, Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida.,Department of Pediatrics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and
| | - Nicole S Torres
- Department of Pediatrics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and
| | | | | | - Jayanthi Chandar
- Pediatric Nephrology.,Miami Transplant Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Tamir Miloh
- Miami Transplant Institute, Miami, Florida.,Pediatric Gastroenterology, and
| | - Paolo Rusconi
- Miami Transplant Institute, Miami, Florida.,Pediatric Cardiology
| | - Jennifer Garcia
- Miami Transplant Institute, Miami, Florida .,Pediatric Gastroenterology, and
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gold A, Bondi BC, Ashkanase J, Dipchand AI. Early school-age cognitive performance post-pediatric heart transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13832. [PMID: 33105067 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As survival in pediatric heart transplantation (HTx) has improved due to medical advances, the analysis of long-term outcomes impacting quality of life such as cognition and development becomes increasingly important. Neuropsychological assessments provide a comprehensive understanding of individual needs, allowing for the development of tailored recommendations and interventions. METHODS Routine neuropsychological assessment was completed between 5 and 7 years of age in this cohort of pediatric HTx recipients at our center (Jan 2014-Oct 2018), including tests of general intellect (WPPSI-IV, WISC-V), academics (WIAT-II/III), perceptual-motor abilities (Beery VMI), and memory (CMS). Relevant medical variables were collected. RESULTS Among 25 children, the median age at testing was 6.7 (IQR:5.8-7.4) years, with a median time since HTx of 5.2 (IQR:4.8-6.8) years. Medical diagnoses included congenital heart disease (CHD; 56%) and cardiomyopathy (44%). Cognitive functioning across the intellectual, academic, and perceptual-motor domains fell within the low-average range, while memory abilities fell within the average range. DSM-5 clinical diagnoses were provided for 14 (56%) children: Intellectual Disability-Mild (20%), Learning Disability (20%), Language Disorder (8%), and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (12%). The presence of neurological issues and/or CHD predicted poorer performance on various neuropsychological domains. CONCLUSIONS Over 50% of this cohort of pediatric heart transplant recipients seen for routine post-HTx neuropsychological assessment received a clinical psychological diagnosis, notably higher than rates in the general population. This population requires monitoring to ensure that high risk children are identified and successfully supported in school and their community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gold
- Department of Psychology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bianca C Bondi
- Department of Psychology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jenna Ashkanase
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anne I Dipchand
- Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mogul DB, Luo X, Bowring MG, Chow EK, Massie AB, Schwarz KB, Cameron AM, Bridges JFP, Segev DL. Fifteen-Year Trends in Pediatric Liver Transplants: Split, Whole Deceased, and Living Donor Grafts. J Pediatr 2018; 196:148-153.e2. [PMID: 29307689 PMCID: PMC5924625 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2017] [Revised: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in patient and graft survival for pediatric liver transplant recipients since 2002, and to determine if these outcomes vary by graft type (whole liver transplant, split liver transplant [SLT], and living donor liver transplant [LDLT]). STUDY DESIGN We evaluated patient and graft survival among pediatric liver-only transplant recipients the PELD/MELD system was implemented using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. RESULTS From 2002-2009 to 2010-2015, survival for SLT at 30 days improved (94% vs 98%; P < .001), and at 1 year improved for SLT (89% to 95%; P <.001) and LDLT (93% to 98%; P = .002). There was no change in survival for whole liver transplant at either 30 days (98% in both; P = .7) or 1 year (94% vs 95%; P = .2). The risk of early death with SLT was 2.14-fold higher in 2002-2009 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] vs whole liver transplant, 1.472.143.12), but this risk disappeared in 2010-2015 (aHR, 0.651.131.96), representing a significant improvement (P = .04). Risk of late death after SLT was similar in both time periods (aHR 2002-2009, 0.871.141.48; aHR 2010-2015, 0.560.881.37). LDLT had similar risk of early death (aHR 2002-2009, 0.491.032.14; aHR 2010-2015, 0.260.742.10) and late death (aHR 2002-2009, 0.520.831.32; aHR 2010-2015, 0.170.441.11). Graft loss was similar for SLT (aHR, 0.931.091.28) and was actually lower for LDLT (aHR, 0.530.710.95). CONCLUSIONS In recent years, outcomes after the use of technical variant grafts are comparable with whole grafts, and may be superior for LDLT. Greater use of technical variant grafts might provide an opportunity to increase organ supply without compromising post-transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas B Mogul
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Xun Luo
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mary G Bowring
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Eric K Chow
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kathleen B Schwarz
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrew M Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John F P Bridges
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hsu EK, Shaffer ML, Gao L, Sonnenday C, Volk ML, Bucuvalas J, Lai JC. Analysis of Liver Offers to Pediatric Candidates on the Transplant Wait List. Gastroenterology 2017; 153:988-995. [PMID: 28711630 PMCID: PMC6288076 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Approximately 10% of children on the liver transplant wait-list in the United States die every year. We examined deceased donor liver offer acceptance patterns and their contribution to pediatric wait-list mortality. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of children on the US liver transplant wait-list from 2007 through 2014 using national transplant registry databases. We determined the frequency, patterns of acceptance, and donor and recipient characteristics associated with deceased donor liver organ offers for children who died or were delisted compared with those who underwent transplantation. Children who died or were delisted were classified by the number of donor liver offers (0 vs 1 or more), limiting analyses to offers of livers that were ultimately transplanted into pediatric recipients. The primary outcome was death or delisting on the wait-list. RESULTS Among 3852 pediatric liver transplant candidates, children who died or were delisted received a median 1 pediatric liver offer (inter-quartile range, 0-2) and waited a median 33 days before removal from the wait-list. Of 11,328 donor livers offered to children, 2533 (12%) were transplanted into children; 1179 of these (47%) were immediately accepted and 1354 (53%) were initially refused and eventually accepted for another child. Of 27,831 adults, 1667 (6.0%; median, 55 years) received livers from donors younger than 18 years (median, 15 years), most (97%) allocated locally or regionally. Of children who died or were delisted, 173 (55%) received an offer of 1 or more liver that was subsequently transplanted into another pediatric recipient, and 143 (45%) died or were delisted with no offers. CONCLUSIONS Among pediatric liver transplant candidates in the US, children who died or were delisted received a median 1 pediatric liver offer and waited a median of 33 days. Of livers transplanted into children, 47% were immediately accepted and 53% were initially refused and eventually accepted for another child. Of children who died or were delisted, 55% received an offer of 1 or more liver that was subsequently transplanted into another pediatric recipient, and 45% died or were delisted with no offers. Pediatric prioritization in the allocation and development of improved risk stratification systems is required to reduce wait-list mortality among children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn K. Hsu
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michele L. Shaffer
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington;,Seattle Children’s Core for Biomedical Statistics, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lucy Gao
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - John Bucuvalas
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jennifer C. Lai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ethical Considerations in the Psychosocial Evaluation of Pediatric Organ Transplant Candidates, Recipients and Their Families. ETHICAL ISSUES IN PEDIATRIC ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29185-7_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
|
15
|
Brosig C, Pai A, Fairey E, Krempien J, McBride M, Lefkowitz DS. Child and family adjustment following pediatric solid organ transplantation: factors to consider during the early years post-transplant. Pediatr Transplant 2014; 18:559-67. [PMID: 24923434 DOI: 10.1111/petr.12286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Adjusting to life after transplant can be challenging to pediatric solid organ transplant recipients and their families. In this review, we discuss a number of important factors to consider during the first 2-3 yr after transplant (defined as the "early years"), including transitioning from hospital to home, returning to physical activity, feeding and nutrition, school reentry, potential cognitive effects of transplant, family functioning, and QOL. We highlight steps that providers can take to optimize child and family adjustment during this period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Brosig
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Herma Heart Center, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Asfaw M, Mingle J, Hendricks J, Pharis M, Nucci AM. Nutrition management after pediatric solid organ transplantation. Nutr Clin Pract 2014; 29:192-200. [PMID: 24523132 DOI: 10.1177/0884533614521242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Survival rates for pediatric transplant recipients and organ grafts have increased due to improvements in surgical techniques and with immunosuppressant treatment therapies. Interdisciplinary management after pediatric organ transplantation is essential to assist not only with the complex medical issues and complications that can result from immunosuppressant therapy but also with the achievement of normal growth and development. Impaired growth is a complication frequently experienced by pediatric transplant patients. The presence or absence of impaired growth is affected by the length of illness prior to transplant, graft function, the use of corticosteroids, and the development of infectious complications after surgery. A review of posttransplant nutrition assessment, nutrition requirements, and nutrition goals is provided. In addition, a case series of experiences with nutrition management of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients is described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meheret Asfaw
- Anita M. Nucci, Department of Nutrition, Georgia State University, PO Box 3995, Atlanta, GA 30302-3995, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Ladner DP, Alonso EM, Butt Z, Caicedo JC, Cella D, Daud A, Friedewald JJ, Gordon EJ, Hazen GB, Ho BT, Hoke KR, Holl JL, Ison MG, Kang R, Mehrotra S, Preczewski LB, Ross OA, Sharaf PH, Skaro AI, Wang E, Wolf MS, Woods DM, Abecassis MM. NUTORC-a transdisciplinary health services and outcomes research team in transplantation. Transl Behav Med 2012; 2:446-458. [PMID: 23667403 PMCID: PMC3647618 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-012-0176-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The field of solid organ transplantation has historically concentrated research efforts on basic science and translational studies. However, there has been increasing interest in health services and outcomes research. The aim was to build an effective and sustainable, inter- and transdisciplinary health services and outcomes research team (NUTORC), that leveraged institutional strengths in social science, engineering, and management disciplines, coupled with an international recognized transplant program. In 2008, leading methodological experts across the university were identified and intramural funding was obtained for the NUTORC initiative. Inter- and transdisciplinary collaborative teams were created across departments and schools within the university. Within 3 years, NUTORC became fiscally sustainable, yielding more than tenfold return of the initial investment. Academic productivity included funding for 39 grants, publication of 60 manuscripts, and 166 national presentations. Sustainable educational opportunities for students were created. Inter- and transdisciplinary health services and outcomes research in transplant can be innovative and sustainable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela P. Ladner
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
- />Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Estella M. Alonso
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Zeeshan Butt
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Juan Carlos Caicedo
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - David Cella
- />Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Amna Daud
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - John J. Friedewald
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Elisa J. Gordon
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Gordon B. Hazen
- />Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Bing T. Ho
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Kathleen R. Hoke
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Jane L. Holl
- />Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Michael G. Ison
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Raymond Kang
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Sanjay Mehrotra
- />Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Luke B. Preczewski
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Olivia A. Ross
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Pamela H. Sharaf
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Anton I. Skaro
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Edward Wang
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Michael S. Wolf
- />Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Donna M. Woods
- />Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Michael M. Abecassis
- />Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
- />Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Motoyama O, Hasegawa A, Aikawa A, Shishido S, Honda M, Tsuzuki K, Kinukawa T, Hattori M, Ogawa O, Yanagihara T, Saito K, Takahashi K, Ohshima S. Final height in a prospective trial of late steroid withdrawal after pediatric renal transplantation treated with cyclosporine and mizoribine. Pediatr Transplant 2012; 16:78-82. [PMID: 22122015 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2011.01614.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A prospective trial of corticosteroid (steroid) withdrawal after pediatric renal transplantation was started in 1990. Fifty-eight recipients with functioning grafts reached their final height. They were transplanted at a mean age of 10.7 yr. Immunosuppressive therapy with CyA, MP, and MZ was started after transplantation. MP was reduced to an alternate-day dose in 49 patients and was withdrawn in 23. Their mean height SDS was -2.4 at the time of transplantation and -2.1 at their final height. Mean final height was 157.9 cm in men and 147.6 cm in women. In 18 patients who had been withdrawn from MP for more than two yr before reaching final height, mean age at transplantation was 8.9 yr. Their mean height SDS of -2.2 at the time of transplantation increased to -1.6 at their final height (p = 0.02), and mean final height was 163.8 cm in men and 147.8 cm in women. The height SDS in all 58 patients was maintained during the immunosuppressive therapy with steroid minimization, and final height SDS increased in recipients older than five yr at transplantation with steroid withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Motoyama
- Department of Nephrology, Toho University Medical Center, Omori Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Neuberger J. Rationing life-saving resources - how should allocation policies be assessed in solid organ transplantation. Transpl Int 2011; 25:3-6. [PMID: 21902728 DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01327.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
22
|
LaRosa C, Glah C, Baluarte HJ, Meyers KEC. Solid-organ transplantation in childhood: transitioning to adult health care. Pediatrics 2011; 127:742-53. [PMID: 21382946 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-1232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric solid-organ transplantation is an increasingly successful treatment for solid-organ failure. With dramatic improvements in patient survival rates over the last several decades, there has been a corresponding emergence of complications attributable to pretransplant factors, transplantation itself, and the management of transplantation with effective immunosuppression. The predominant solid-organ transplantation sequelae are medical and psychosocial. These sequelae have a substantial effect on transition to adult care; as such, hurdles to successful transition of care arise from the patients, their families, and pediatric and adult health care providers. Crucial to successful transitioning is the ongoing development of a sense of autonomy and responsibility for one's own care. In this article we address the barriers to transitioning that occur with long-term survival in pediatric solid-organ transplantation. Although a particular transitioning model is not promoted, practical tools and strategies that contribute to successful transitioning of pediatric patients who have received a transplant are suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher LaRosa
- Division of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
LaR Pediatric solid-organ transplantation is an increasingly successful treatment for organ failure. Five- and 10-yr patient survival rates have dramatically improved over the last couple of decades, and currently, over 80% of pediatric patients survive into adolescence and young adulthood. Waiting list mortality has been a concern for liver, heart, and intestinal transplantation, illustrating the importance of transplant as a life-saving therapy. Unfortunately, the success of pediatric transplantation comes at the cost of long-term or late complications that arise as a result of allograft rejection or injury, immunosuppression-related morbidity, or both. As transplant recipients enter adolescence treatment, non-adherence becomes a significant issue, and the medical and psychosocial impacts transition to adulthood not only with regard to healthcare but also in terms of functional outcomes, economic potential, and overall QoL. This review addresses the clinical and psychosocial challenges encountered by pediatric transplant recipients in the current era. A better understanding of pediatric transplant outcomes and adult morbidity and mortality requires further ongoing assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher LaRosa
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|