Short Stature: Is It a Psychosocial Problem and Does Changing Height Matter?

GH Treatment in Children of Normal Height

The increased availability of recombinant human GH (rhGH), albeit at a relatively high cost, has increased a demand for treatment of children and adolescents of normal height to increase their adult stature. There are no scientific reports on the efficacy and safety of rhGH therapy in this condition; therefore, the authors comment on the possible causes and consequences based on their personal opinion and experience. As in gigantism, when GH action and end-organ are normal, enough GH is expected to result in increased growth velocity. Short-term adverse effects related to rhGH therapy for approved indications of short stature in children have been very rare. Data on long-term adverse effects are still scarce. A small increase in height might be statistically significant but not functionally or socially relevant. Considering that an increase in height represents more a desire than a need, physicians should emphasize the normality and qualities of these children, discuss with families the alternatives, such as counseling, and refrain from supporting the concept that taller is better.

Heightism, growth hormone treatment, and social functioning: a holistic approach to a persistent clinical challenge

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Use of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment to increase height in children with non-growth hormone deficient short stature is becoming more common. Yet, the evidence to support the notion that augmenting height directly leads to increased well being, specifically psychosocial well being, is inconsistent, with high-quality evidence lacking.

RECENT FINDINGS

Review of recent studies demonstrates that the association between height augmentation and psychosocial well being is complex. The direct contribution of height to well being may be less than the current model of clinical care of short stature assumes. Rather, the new studies provide evidence to support a role for psychosocial factors, including height-related beliefs, social support, and coping skills, in promoting psychosocial well being, specifically quality of life and self-esteem.

SUMMARY

Clinical care of short stature would benefit from incorporating a holistic model of care that considers psychosocial interventions in addition to, or instead of, rhGH treatment.

Pubertal Suppression in Early Puberty Followed by Testosterone Mildly Increases Final Height in Transmasculine Youth

Context

Treatment for transmasculine youth (TMY) can involve testosterone treatment and is sometimes preceded by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment for puberty blockade. GnRHas can increase final height in birth-assigned females with central precocious puberty. Maximizing final adult height (FAH) is an important outcome for many TMY.

Objective

Our objective was to determine how GnRHa treatment before testosterone impacts FAH.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study at 5 US transgender health clinics. Participants were 32 TMY treated with GnRHas in early to midpuberty before testosterone (GnRHa + T group) and 62 late/postpubertal TMY treated with testosterone only (T-only group).

Results

The difference between FAH minus midparental target height (MPTH) was +2.3 ± 5.7 cm and -2.2 ± 5.6 cm in the GnRHa + T and T-only groups, respectively (P < .01). In the GnRHa + T group, FAH was 1.8 ± 3.4 cm greater than predicted adult height (PAH) (P < .05) and FAH vs initial height (IH) z-score was 0.5 ± 1.2 vs 0.16 ± 1.0 (P < .05). After adjusting for patient characteristics, each additional month of GnRHa monotherapy increased FAH by 0.59 cm (95% CI 0.31, 0.9 cm), stage 3 breast development at start of GnRHa was associated with 6.5 cm lower FAH compared with stage 2 (95% CI -10.43, -2.55), and FAH was 7.95 cm greater in the GnRHa + T group than in T-only group (95% CI -10.85, -5.06).

Conclusion

Treatment with GnRHa in TMY in early puberty before testosterone increases FAH compared with MPTH, PAH, IH, and TMY who only received testosterone in late/postpuberty. TMY considering GnRHas should be counseled that GnRHas may mildly increase their FAH if started early.

Views on Short Stature of Female vs Male Endocrine Pediatric Patients Undergoing Provocative Growth Hormone Testing and Their Parents

OBJECTIVE

Boys outnumber girls in short stature evaluations and growth hormone treatment despite absence of gender differences in short stature prevalence. Family views on short stature influence medical management, but gender-based analysis of these views is lacking. This study explored endocrine patients' and their parents' perceptions of short stature and its impact on quality of life by patient gender.

METHODS

Patients aged 8 to 14 years undergoing provocative growth hormone testing and 1 parent each completed semistructured interviews. Clinical data were extracted by chart review.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patient-parent dyads (6 female patients, 22 mothers; predominantly non-Hispanic White) participated. Six major themes emerged: (1) patients' perceptions of their short stature were similar by gender, (2) physical experiences of short stature were similar by gender, (3) social experiences of short stature were both similar and different by gender, (4) parental perceptions of short stature as a factor limiting their child's functionality were similar by gender, (5) concern about societal stigma related to short stature arose for both genders, and (6) patients' perceptions of parental messaging about the import of their short stature were similar by gender.

CONCLUSION

Our data reveal more similarities than differences between genders in patient perceptions and patient and parent-reported experiences of short stature. Worry about stature-related stigma was noted for patients of both genders. Parental messaging about short stature emerged as an important area to explore further by patient gender. Our findings suggest that clinicians should be wary of making gender or stigma-based assumptions when evaluating children with short stature.

Evaluation of height centile growth patterns compared with parental-adjusted target height following kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early steroid withdrawal (ESW) improves growth following kidney transplant (KT). It is not known whether these children achieve target height within mid-parental height range post-KT.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of growth patterns of KT recipients following ESW in our center between 2009 and 2020 had minimum follow-up period of 12 months.

RESULTS

Forty-eight (female 29.2%) KT recipients, median age 5.3 years at first KT, were included. At KT, 29 (60.4%) recipients had normal height (SDS≥-1.88) and in 23 (47.9%), the height was within their target height (parental-adjusted height SDS within ±1.55). The proportion of children achieving normal height at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-years post-KT (median 5.5 years) were 75%, 83.3%, 86.5%, and 88% respectively. The proportion of children achieving target height measured at the same intervals was 68.8%, 73.8%, 73%, and 80%, respectively. Children <6 years were most growth impaired at KT but were most likely to achieve target height within first-year post-KT (72%; p = .023). All 19 children with short stature at KT received dialysis. Three children received growth hormone post-KT. Children who did not achieve target height post-KT (n = 14), five had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² , and eight were on corticosteroid therapy at latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Although vast majority of children achieved normal height post-KT following ESW during the first 5 years post-KT, 20% of these children had not achieved their target height post-KT.

Adult height and health-related quality of life in patients born small for gestational age treated with recombinant growth hormone

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is a relevant result when assessing the course of different pathologies and the efficacy of their treatments. HRQoL has been studied previously on adults born small for gestational age (SGA), both in the general population and in patients who had received recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment, with disparate results. Our study included 50 adults who had received rhGH treatment for the SGA indication in 4 Spanish hospitals. Data have been gathered retrospectively from their clinical records, current weight and height were measured, and patients have been asked to fill out SF-36 and QoLAGHDA quality of life forms, and the Graffar test to evaluate their socio-economical status. Patient's adult height was - 1.2 ± 0.9 SD, lower than their target height of 1 ± 0.8 SD, but gaining 1.7 ± 1 SD from the beginning of the treatment. SF-36 test results showed lower scoring on Mental Health domains than on those related to Physical Health. No correlation was found between HRQoL results and final height, rhGH treatment duration or puberty. Correlation was indeed found between QoLAGHDA and several domains of SF-36, but QoLAGHDA detected fewer patients with low HRQoL than SF-36. Thus, it is concluded that SGA patient's follow-up should include a HRQoL, neuro-cognitive and psychiatric assessment in their transition to adult age. Adult SGA patients without catch up growth have impaired HRQoL, especially in mental health domains.

Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Herbal Medicine and Growth Hormone Compared to Growth Hormone Monotherapy for Short Stature Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Herbal medicines (HM) and growth hormones (GH) are widely used to treat short stature (SS) in children. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy with HM and GH (CHG) compared to those of GH monotherapy (GHM) in children with SS.

Methods

We searched 17 electronic databases from inception to 1 April 2021. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Two authors independently performed the selection and quality assessment of the included studies using Cochrane Handbook criteria. Relative risk (RR) was used to measure dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Mean difference (MD) or standard MD (SMD) was used to measure continuous outcomes with a 95% CI.

Results

Seven RCTs involving 455 participants with SS were included. Standard deviations in height (MD = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.24–0.38, p < 0.00001), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (MD = 1.39, 95% CI: 0.93–1.85, p < 0.00001) were significantly higher in the CHG group than in the GHM group. Growth velocity (MD = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.34–2.31, p < 0.00001) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (MD = 61.85, 95% CI: 55.80–67.90, p < 0.00001) were significantly higher in the CHG group. Adverse events were significantly lower in the CHG group (risk ratio: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02–0.54, p = 0.007). However, the level of evidence was low.

Conclusions

CHG demonstrated significantly better efficacy than GHM for treating SS, with a low incidence of adverse events. However, since the level of evidence is low, methodologically standardized RCTs are required to verify these results.

Analysis of risk factors and construction of a prediction model for short stature in children

BACKGROUND

Short stature in children is an important global health issue. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with short stature and to construct a clinical prediction model and risk classification system for short stature.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 12,504 children aged 6-14 years of age from 13 primary and secondary schools in Pingshan District, Shenzhen. A physical examination was performed to measure the height and weight of the children. Questionnaires were used to obtain information about children and their parents, including sex, age, family environment, social environment, maternal conditions during pregnancy, birth and feeding, and lifestyle. The age confounding variable was adjusted through a 1 : 1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and 1,076 children were selected for risk factor analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of short stature in children aged 6-14 years was 4.3% in the Pingshan District, Shenzhen. The multivariate logistic regression model showed that the influencing factors for short stature were father's height, mother's height, annual family income, father's level of education and parents' concern for their children's height in the future (P < 0.05). Based on the short stature multivariate logistic regression model, a short stature nomogram prediction model was constructed. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.748, indicating a good degree of discrimination of the nomogram. According to the calibration curve, the Hosmer-Lemesio test value was 0.917, and the model was considered to be accurate. Based on a risk classification system derived from the nomogram prediction model, the total score of the nomogram was 127.5, which is considered the cutoff point to divides all children into low-risk and high-risk groups.

CONCLUSION

This study analyzed the risk factors for short stature in children and constructed a nomogram prediction model and a risk classification system based on these risk factors, as well as providing short stature screening and assessment individually.

Parental Concerns on Short Stature: A 15-Year Follow-Up

OBJECTIVES

To compare parental attitudes about short stature over time and determine possible factors that predict changes in attitudes.

STUDY DESIGN

At baseline (1993-1994), we surveyed parents about their attitudes regarding their children's height. We compared parents of children (aged 4-15 years) referred to endocrinologists (referred, 154) with those of children with heights <10th percentile seen by pediatricians during regular visits (control, 240). At follow-up (2008-2009), 103 control and 98 referred parents completed a similar survey. We then made a logistic regression analysis to observe changes in perception. Primary variables included self-esteem, treatment by peers, and ability to cope with current height.

RESULTS

At baseline, referred parents perceived a worse impact of short stature on their children than did controls. At follow-up, instead, referred parents were 3.8 times more likely to report improvement in self-esteem, 2.4 times more likely to report improved treatment from peers, and 5.7 times more likely to report overall ability to cope with height than were unreferred parents. Perception of psychosocial improvement was greater in the referred than the control group. Referral was a stronger predictor of an improved follow-up response than patients' current height or change in height.

CONCLUSIONS

While incorporating parental attitudes into management decisions, clinicians should be aware that parental perceptions may change over time and that referral itself may lead parents to perceive psychosocial improvements over time.

Dilemmas of growth hormone treatment for GH deficiency and idiopathic short stature: defining, distinguishing, and deciding

Worrisome growth can be a sign of underlying pathology but usually reflects healthy variation. It is often recognized through short stature, which is defined by arbitrarily separating height, a physical trait on a continuum, into "normal" and "abnormal." In some cases of worrisome growth, recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment is indicated to hasten growth/increase height. This review addresses the two most frequently treated indications for rhGH, growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and idiopathic short stature (ISS). A review of worrisome growth itself, of the history of GH treatment, of the blurry line between partial GHD and ISS, of the GH stakeholders, and of the outside pressures involved in these cases demonstrates the ambiguous platform upon which treatment decisions are made. The rhGH treatment decision process can be examined further by considering the three most impactful factors on parental height-related medical decision-making: treatment characteristics, child health, and psychosocial function. While it is important to note that treatment for classical GHD is uncontroversial and supported, treatment decisions for partial GHD and ISS are more complicated and require careful evaluation of both patient needs and the supporting evidence. As the rhGH community grows, physicians, parents, and patients are encouraged to engage in a shared decision-making process to navigate the many challenges facing the GH field. Although this review addresses GHD and ISS specifically, the issues discussed are often applicable to pediatrics as a whole.

The clinician's role in promoting resiliency for individuals and families with growth anomalies

Some recent clinic and population-based studies suggest that severe short stature is not associated with significant behavioral and psychological problems, however collectively studies on this topic are variable and frequently contradictory. In light of these contradictory sources, it is important to recognize that there may be some children for whom growth failure is disabling. Many of such children can respond to counseling and support, but there may be occasions in which therapy can be recommended. Resiliency can be defined as a pattern of positive adaptation in the context of past or present adversity with resiliency in childhood defined as typical development in the face of adverse circumstances that propel others to deleterious outcomes. Several strategies for promoting resilience in short stature patients and their families include 1) conducting a comprehensive psychosocial assessment; 2) recommending psychological strategies to directly address predictable social challenges associated with short stature; 3) discouraging the expectation that taller stature is associated with improvement in quality of life and; 4) discussing treatment efficacy in terms of the degree of certainty and magnitude of effects. Recognizing time constraints in clinical settings, these approaches can be carried out across multiple visits. Being aware of, honoring, and addressing factors the parent and patient use in making their treatment decisions has the potential to promote resiliency in patients and families. This approach to clinical care can serve to promote resiliency in clinicians as well.

Depression in Turner Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Turner syndrome (TS) is a genetic condition characterized by partial or complete monosomy X. Alterations in hormonal function, height, and peer relationships, among other features and correlates of TS, appear to be risks for depressive illness. In order to summarize what is known about depression in Turner syndrome, with the aim of determining whether individuals with TS are at increased risk for depression, a literature search and analysis were conducted. In total, 69 studies were identified and 35 met criteria of being peer-reviewed English language articles that collected original data on the experience of depression in individuals with TS. Most studies used patient or parent questionnaires to evaluate depressive symptoms. These studies, a majority of which examined adults and half that examined adolescents, found that individuals with TS experienced more frequent and severe depressive symptoms than individuals without TS diagnoses. Articles studying children with TS did not demonstrate a difference in their depressive experience compared to individuals without TS. Three articles used clinician-administered scales, such as the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; all diagnosed depression in those with TS at higher rates than others. Five studies relied on expert opinion to evaluate depression. The remaining eight articles were case reports or case series that relied on expert opinion. From these data, we conclude that adolescents and adults with TS are at risk for depression and adulthood appears to be the period of the highest risk. Studies in the last 12 years show consistently more severe depressive symptoms in individuals with TS than in previous years. Implications, risk factors, and recommendations for future research are discussed.

What is the evidence for beneficial effects of growth hormone treatment beyond height in short children born small for gestational age? A review of published literature

Background An increasing body of evidence supports the view that both an adverse intrauterine milieu and rapid postnatal weight gain in children born small for gestational age (SGA) contribute towards the risk for the development of chronic diseases in adult life. Content The aim of this review was to identify and summarize the published evidence on metabolic and cardiovascular risk, as well as risk of impaired cardiac function, intellectual capacity, quality of life, pubertal development and bone strength among children born SGA. The review will then address whether growth hormone (GH) therapy, commonly prescribed to reduce the height deficit in children born SGA who do not catch up in height, increases or decreases these risks over time. Summary Overall, there are limited data in support of a modest beneficial effect of GH therapy on the adverse metabolic and cardiovascular risk observed in short children born SGA. Evidence to support a positive effect of GH on bone strength and psychosocial outcomes is less convincing. Outlook Further evaluation into the clinical relevance of any potential long-term benefits of GH therapy on metabolic and cardiovascular endpoints is warranted.

Height Gain and Safety Outcomes in Growth Hormone-Treated Children with Idiopathic Short Stature: Experience from a Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Growth hormone (GH) treatment of idiopathic short stature (ISS) received US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2003. We assessed height gain and safety in 2,450 children with ISS treated with GH in US clinical practice.

METHODS

Short-term height gain, near-adult height (NAH), and safety outcomes were investigated using Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study data.

RESULTS

Compared to children with isolated idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD), those with ISS were shorter at baseline but had similar age and GH dose. Mean ± SD height SD score (SDS) increase was similar for ISS and IGHD, with 0.6 ± 0.3 (first), 0.4 ± 0.3 (second), 0.3 ± 0.3 (third), and 0.1 ± 0.3 (fourth year) for ISS. Girls with ISS (27% of subjects) were younger and shorter than boys but had similar height gain over time. At NAH in the ISS group (n = 467), mean ± SD age, GH duration, and height SDS were 17.3 ± 2.3 years, 4.6 ± 2.7 years, and -1.2 ± 0.9, respectively. Height gain from baseline was 1.1 ± 1.0 SDS and was greater for boys than girls (1.2 ± 1.0 vs. 0.9 ± 0.9), but boys were treated longer (5.1 ± 2.8 vs. 3.6 ± 2.5 years). Adverse events were reported for 24% with ISS versus 20% with IGHD - most were common childhood conditions or previously reported in GH-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

GH-treated children with ISS achieved substantial height gain, similar to patients with IGHD. Fewer GH-treated girls were enrolled than boys, but with similar height SDS gain over time. No ISS-specific safety issues were identified. Thus, GH treatment of ISS appears to have a safety/effectiveness profile similar to that of IGHD.

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Assessing Barriers to Growth Hormone Treatment (BAR-GHT)

Purpose: This paper presents development and validation of a new patient reported outcome measure (PRO), the Barriers to Growth Hormone Therapy (BAR-GHT) in a patient (child/adolescent) and a parent version. The BAR-GHT was developed to measure problems and potential barriers to GHT. Methods: The development and validation of the BAR-GHT was conducted according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance on the development of PROs. Concept elicitation included a literature review and open-ended interviews with young patients, parents, and clinical experts. Qualitative data were analyzed based on grounded theory principles and draft items were rated in terms of their importance and clarity. The instruments underwent psychometric validation in a German clinic-based patient population of children and adolescents who inject themselves and in a parent sample who inject their child. The statistical analysis plan included exploratory factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Results: 29 patients, 22 parents, and 4 clinical experts participated in the concept elicitation, 156 children and adolescents aged 8-18 years and 146 parents completed the validation study. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in six domains: Fear, Public Embarrassment, Annoyance, Daily Routine, Supplies, and Travel. Internal consistencies and test-retest reliabilities of the total score of both the patient version and the parent version were >0.8. Convergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated. Conclusions: The final 19-item BAR-GHT for patients aged 8-18 years and the 16-item version for parents can be considered reliable and valid PROs of barriers to GHT. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03672617. Universal Trial Number (UTN) of the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP, www.who.int): U1111-1210-1036.

Is height important for quality of life in children with skeletal dysplasias?

Skeletal dysplasias are a large and heterogeneous group of conditions that affect growth and development of the skeleton. As might be expected, short stature is a frequent manifestation of these disorders but other complications do occur with varying frequencies depending on specific diagnosis and age of the patient. With the ongoing development of targeted therapies for achondroplasia and possibly other skeletal dysplasias, it is important to ascertain what are the factors influencing quality of life if we are to make meaningful assessments of therapeutic efficacy. Is it the short stature, in and of itself, that affects the quality of life for children with skeletal dysplasias or are the other complications more important determinants? We sought to address the effect of height by the use of questionnaire designed specifically for short stature; QoLissy. This questionnaire has been validated for use in Europe across several languages. Our study included 8 families with children between 8 and 18 years with a variety of skeletal dysplasia diagnoses. The results indicate a relatively low health-related quality of life from the child and parents' perspective, good coping strategies and, interestingly, a difference in perception of quality of life between parents and children, with parents rating the quality of life lower than their children. These results highlight the need for a more careful dissection of quality of life-influencers before deciding on how to assess drug efficacy and before advocating for multi-year therapy in children.

Quality of Life in Adolescent Boys with Idiopathic Short Stature: Positive Impact of Growth Hormone and Aromatase Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The combination of growth hormone (GH) and aromatase inhibitors (AI) improves linear growth in severely short adolescent boys; however, the effects of this intervention on quality of life (QoL) are unknown. This study assesses whether GH, AI, or their combination impacts the QoL of adolescent males with idiopathic short stature (ISS) from both the adolescent and the parent perspective.

METHOD

A randomized open-label comparator trial was conducted in 76 pubertal males with ISS who received AI, GH, or AI/GH for 24 months. The condition-specific Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth questionnaire was used to assess QoL.

RESULTS

QoL scores were low at baseline in the children's and parents' reports. Within-group testing showed that total QoL scores increased significantly at 24 months in the GH and AI/GH group but not the AI group in the children's report, whereas it increased in all of the groups in the parents' report. Increases in QoL scores were associated with an increase in height SDS.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with GH and AI/GH was associated with improved QoL scores as measured from both the patients' and the parents' perspectives, suggesting that the improved growth resulting from the use of these growth-promoting therapies has beneficial psychosocial effects in adolescent males with ISS followed for 24 months.

Analysis of the value and correlation of IGF-1 with GH and IGFBP-3 in the diagnosis of dwarfism

Correlation between the value of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in the diagnosis of dwarfism and the levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) was investigated. From April 2014 to June 2017, 122 children with dwarfism who were treated in The Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University were selected as the experimental group, and 51 normal children as the control group. The basic information was recorded in detail; serum GH and IGFBP-3 levels were measured using an arginine stimulation test and an insulin hypoglycemia stimulation test, respectively. According to the peak of GH in the experimental group, there were 65 cases of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and 57 cases of idiopathic short stature (ISS). The expression levels of IGF-1 of the serum in the experimental and control group were detected by chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). The correlation between IGF-1 and GH, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 was analyzed. The expression level of serum IGF-1 in GHD group was significantly lower than that in the ISS group (P<0.05). The expression level of serum IGF-1 in GHD group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The expression level of serum IGF-1 in ISS group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The results of partial correlation studies showed that IGF-1 is positively correlated with GH and IGFBP-3. Detection of GH and IGFBP-3 are important for the early diagnosis and comprehensive evaluation of children with dwarfism, and also in the detection of IGF-1 can reflect the therapeutic effect of dwarfism on recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment, which is worthy of application in clinics.

Cost-Conscious Growth-Promoting Treatment: When Discretion Is the Better Part of Value

Assessing cost-effectiveness of human growth hormone (hGH) treatment to augment height is complicated by uncertainty about how best to measure its therapeutic effect. Cost-conscious growth promotion practice, however, is possible and likely an emerging practical requisite as health care payers increasingly deny the medical necessity of and restrict support for short stature treatment. The increase in denials is not surprising given the expansion and continued high cost of hGH treatment, debate about the value of such treatment, and universal need to restrain burgeoning health care costs. Renunciation of sweeping payer rejection of hGH-for-height treatment is strengthened by cost-conscious practices that (1) recommend no treatment for most short children and restrict treatment to severe, likely disabling short stature; (2) initiate hGH treatment only after evidence-based informed assent; (3) utilize alternative less costly and less invasive options when possible; (4) minimize hGH treatment duration and dosage; and (5) resist enhancement of normal adult stature. A new era of cost-conscious hGH prescribing that prompts thoughtful restraint in hGH use could help preserve hGH approval for children most in need of treatment.

Children Born Small for Gestational Age: Differential Diagnosis, Molecular Genetic Evaluation, and Implications

Children born small for gestational age (SGA), defined as a birth weight and/or length below -2 SD score (SDS), comprise a heterogeneous group. The causes of SGA are multifactorial and include maternal lifestyle and obstetric factors, placental dysfunction, and numerous fetal (epi)genetic abnormalities. Short-term consequences of SGA include increased risks of hypothermia, polycythemia, and hypoglycemia. Although most SGA infants show catch-up growth by 2 years of age, ∼10% remain short. Short children born SGA are amenable to GH treatment, which increases their adult height by on average 1.25 SD. Add-on treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist may be considered in early pubertal children with an expected adult height below -2.5 SDS. A small birth size increases the risk of later neurodevelopmental problems and cardiometabolic diseases. GH treatment does not pose an additional risk.

CHALLENGES OF SECURING GROWTH HORMONE COVERAGE FOR IDIOPATHIC SHORT STATURE: REVIEW OF THE 7-YEAR EXPERIENCE AT ONE INSTITUTION

OBJECTIVE

Despite U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approval of growth hormone (GH) for idiopathic short stature (ISS), many providers face challenges obtaining insurance coverage. We reviewed the insurance coverage experience for ISS at our hospital to identify factors predictive of approval or denial.

METHODS

We reviewed charts of patients who underwent GH stimulation testing from July 1, 2009, to April 30, 2017, to identify ISS patients (height <-2.25 SD, subnormal predicted adult height (PAH) and peak GH >10 ng/mL).

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients met ISS criteria, of whom 47 (29 male/18 female) had a GH request submitted to insurance. Mean age, height, and growth velocity were 8.6 ± 2.7 years, 2.83 ± 0.4 SD, and 4.4 ± 1.7 cm/year, respectively. Mean PAH based on bone age was -2.50 ± 0.9 SD, equaling 62 inches for males and 58 inches for females. Most had private managed care insurance (74%). Overall, 17/47 (36%) received treatment approval, 7 immediately and 10 more on appeal. There were no differences in age, height SD, growth rate, insurance type, or PAH between the 17 who were approved and the 30 denied. For 21 patients who were treated, a mean increase in 0.6 SD in height was seen after 1 year.

CONCLUSION

At our institution, GH coverage requests for ISS included very short children mostly ages 6 to 11, with heights well below -2.25 SD and poor PAH. Only 36% were approved even after appeal. This highlights the challenge in our area to secure GH treatment for a FDA-approved indication. Collaboration between pediatric endocrinologists and insurers focusing on height SD and PAH, may improve cost-effective coverage to deserving short children who meet FDA guidelines for ISS treatment.

ABBREVIATIONS

FDA = Food and Drug Administration; GH = growth hormone; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1; ISS = idiopathic short stature; PAH = predicted adult height.

Growth Hormone Therapy for a Child With Severe Cognitive Impairment

The expansion of growth hormone therapy over the last 3 decades has allowed for treatment of short stature for more children, resulting in increased height for many. However, treatment of idiopathic short stature remains controversial. Treatment decisions for disabled children with idiopathic short stature are even more complicated. We discuss a specific case of short stature in a disabled child and grapple with the ethical issues involved in the use of growth hormone.

The psychometric evaluation of the quality of life in short stature youth (QoLISSY) instrument for German children born small for gestational age

PURPOSE

This study aimed to validate the disease-specific "quality of life in short stature youth (QoLISSY)-instrument" that assessesQuery the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in German children and adolescents diagnosed as small for gestational age (SGA) in a patient and parent report.

METHODS

The psychometric performance of the German version of the QoLISSY questionnaire was examined in terms of reliability and validity in 65 SGA families (17 child reports/64 parent reports) and compared to the psychometric performance of the original European QoLISSY dataset of over 200 children with growth hormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature (ISS).

RESULTS

The analysis yielded psychometrically favorable results with excellent reliability and acceptable discriminant validity. The instrument's operating characteristics were comparable to the results of the original European QoLISSY data. In the parent- as well as child report, children with SGA had lower HrQoL scores than children with ISS. Convergent validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between the QoLISSY scales and the generic KIDSCREEN-10 Index.

CONCLUSION

Psychometric testing suggests that QoLISSY is a promising instrument to assess the HrQoL of young German people with SGA. Both versions (parent- and child report) appear to detect differences between SGA and other conditions (e.g. ISS). QoLISSY can be used in clinical studies, health service research, as well as in practice in children with SGA and their parents. For a cross-cultural application of the instrument in SGA, the tool needs be validated in sufficiently large SGA samples within respective countries.

Association between Growth Hormone-Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Axis Gene Polymorphisms and Short Stature in Chinese Children

Objective

This study was designed to analyze the association between the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-1 (GH-IGF-1) axis gene polymorphisms and short stature in Chinese children.

Methods

181 growth hormone deficiency (GHD) patients and 206 normal stature controls were enrolled to attend this study. Five single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the GH receptor (GHR) and 5 SNPs within the GH-signaling pathway were genotyped by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry. We conducted an association study between these SNPs and the risk of developing short stature. Linkage disequilibrium analysis was performed using Haploview software and the associations of the SNPs frequencies with short stature were analyzed using X² tests.

Results

No significant difference was found in gender, weight, height, and BMI between the GHD and control groups, except that the age of GHD group was older than the control one. Allele and genotype frequencies were consistent with those expected from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Compared with the controls, heterozygous genotype frequencies (CT) of rs12515480 and rs6873545 of GHR gene were significantly lower. Genotype frequencies of the other 8 SNPs did not show significant difference between these two groups. Considering a dominant model, an OR < 1 was observed for genotypes rs12515480 (OR = 0.532, P = 0.019) and rs6873545 (OR = 0.587, P = 0.017).

Conclusions

The heterozygous genotypes of rs12515480 and rs6873545 of GHR gene were associated with decreased risk of GHD in Chinese children.

Children's psychosocial functioning and parents' quality of life in paediatric short stature: The mediating role of caregiving stress

OBJECTIVES

On the basis of the multidimensional model of the caregiving process, this study aimed (a) to compare the levels of quality of life (QoL) and psychological problems of children with short stature and the levels of caregiving stress and QoL of their parents, between diagnostic, treatment, and current height deviation groups, and (b) to examine the direct and indirect links, via caregiving stress, between children's psychosocial functioning and their parents' QoL.

METHOD

The sample was collected in 5 European countries and comprised 238 dyads of 8- to 18-year-old children and adolescents with a clinical diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature and one of their parents. The children completed self-report measures of height-related QoL (Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth Core Module) and psychological problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire); the parents reported on their own QoL (EUROHIS-QOL-8 Index) and caregiving stress (Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth Effects on Parents subscale).

RESULTS

Children who were treated and who achieved normal height reported better QoL compared to those untreated and with current short stature. Parents of children with idiopathic short stature and current short stature presented greater caregiving stress than parents of children with growth hormone deficiency and achieved normal height. Children's better psychosocial functioning was indirectly associated with parents' better QoL, via less caregiving stress, and these links were invariant across diagnoses, treatment status, and current height deviation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that, along with growth hormone treatments, multidisciplinary interventions in paediatric endocrinology should be family-centred, by targeting both the children's psychosocial functioning and the parents' stress, in order to improve individual and family adaptation.

Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: proceedings from the 2016 Cincinnati International Turner Syndrome Meeting

Turner syndrome affects 25-50 per 100,000 females and can involve multiple organs through all stages of life, necessitating multidisciplinary approach to care. Previous guidelines have highlighted this, but numerous important advances have been noted recently. These advances cover all specialty fields involved in the care of girls and women with TS. This paper is based on an international effort that started with exploratory meetings in 2014 in both Europe and the USA, and culminated with a Consensus Meeting held in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA in July 2016. Prior to this meeting, five groups each addressed important areas in TS care: 1) diagnostic and genetic issues, 2) growth and development during childhood and adolescence, 3) congenital and acquired cardiovascular disease, 4) transition and adult care, and 5) other comorbidities and neurocognitive issues. These groups produced proposals for the present guidelines. Additionally, four pertinent questions were submitted for formal GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) evaluation with a separate systematic review of the literature. These four questions related to the efficacy and most optimal treatment of short stature, infertility, hypertension, and hormonal replacement therapy. The guidelines project was initiated by the European Society for Endocrinology and the Pediatric Endocrine Society, in collaboration with The European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, The Endocrine Society, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, The American Heart Association, The Society for Endocrinology, and the European Society of Cardiology. The guideline has been formally endorsed by the European Society for Endocrinology, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the Endocrine Society. Advocacy groups appointed representatives who participated in pre-meeting discussions and in the consensus meeting.

Growth hormone treatment for growth hormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature: new guidelines shaped by the presence and absence of evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The Pediatric Endocrine Society recently published new guidelines for the use of human growth hormone (hGH) and human insulin-like growth factor-I (hIGF-I) treatment for growth hormone deficiency, idiopathic short stature, and primary IGF-I deficiency in children and adolescents. This review places the new guidelines in historical contexts of the life cycle of hGH and the evolution of US health care, and highlights their future implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The new hGH guidelines, the first to be created by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, are more conservative than their predecessors. They follow an extended period of hGH therapeutic expansion at a time when US health care is pivoting toward value-based practice. There are strong supporting evidence and general agreement regarding the restoration of hormonal normalcy in children with severe deficiency of growth hormone or hIGF-I. More complex are issues related to hGH treatment to increase growth rates and heights of otherwise healthy short children with either idiopathic short stature or 'partial' isolated idiopathic growth hormone deficiency.

SUMMARY

The guidelines-developing process revealed fundamental questions about hGH treatment that still need evidence-based answers. Unless and until such research is performed, a more restrained hGH-prescribing approach is appropriate.

Growth Promotion Ethics and the Challenge to Resist Cosmetic Endocrinology

The advancement of "human growth hormone (hGH)-for-height" - increasing height attainment in children short for reasons other than GH deficiency - arose from intuitive, deep-seated assumptions about the disability of short stature, its improvement with hGH-mediated height gain, and the safety of escalating dosages of hGH in healthy children. Evidence challenging these assumptions now strengthens criticism of hGH-for-height as cosmetic endocrinology. To counter this characterization, collective acceptance of guidelines is needed that advise nontreatment of the vast majority of short children, support strategies that minimize treatment duration and dosage, and restrain enhancement of normal adult stature. Through a clinical case analysis, ethical issues underlying these recommendations are explored. These include duties to provide informed assent and re-assent, protect children from unnecessary treatment, consider fairness to nontreated children, and allocate healthcare resources responsibly. Informed assent for hGH-for-height should ensure awareness of modest, variable height gain expectations, limited evidence for psychosocial benefit, ongoing studies for potential posttreatment adverse effects, and options for less expensive/invasive approaches, including nontreatment and counseling. Approaching growth pro-motion in this way fosters therapeutic restraint, resists the al lure of enhancement therapy, and minimizes contributions to society's perception that to be taller is to be better.
.

Associations between Psychological Problems and Quality of Life in Pediatric Short Stature from Patients' and Parents' Perspectives

Short stature has been associated with psychosocial impairments, but whether treatments and achieved height impact on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and psychological functioning of children/adolescents is still controversial. This study aimed to examine the effects of height deviation and treatment status on psychosocial adaptation outcomes and to identify clinical and psychosocial determinants of internalizing/externalizing problems in a large cohort of short statured children/adolescents from seven European countries. Participants were 345 children aged 8–18 years with a clinical diagnosis of short stature and 421 parents of 4–18 year-old patients. Children and parents reported on psychological problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire), generic (KIDSCREEN) and condition-specific HrQoL (QoLISSY). According to analyses of covariance, children/adolescents with current short stature presented more parent-reported internalizing problems and lower self- and parent-reported condition-specific HrQoL, compared to patients with an achieved height above -2SD. Treated children self-reported better HrQoL than the untreated group. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that, rather than height–related clinical variables, children’s sex, younger age and poorer HrQoL were the best predictors of psychological problems, explaining 39% of the variance in patient- and 42% in parent-reported internalizing problems, and 22% of the variance in patient- and 24% in parent-reported externalizing problems. Treatment status also moderated the negative links between patient-reported HrQoL and internalizing problems, explaining 2% of additional variance. These results suggest that children with current short stature are at greater risk for internalizing problems. Routine assessment of HrQoL in pediatric healthcare may help identify children for referral to specialized psychological assessment and intervention.